Posted: March 9, 2013 by SJD in Prenda This is a wonderful news: yesterday Electronic Frontier Foundation
announced on Twitter that it would help to fight the subpoena in the copyright troll Prenda’s
defamation lawsuits designed to silence the troll’s critics:
We should expect an official press release on Monday, I guess.
My heart has melted because of all the support we have received. The
site traffic was unprecedentedly high over the last week, and people
(even those who never heard of us before) have offered all types of
help, including creating a fund to raise the defense money. With EFF’s
involvement, it became a no-brainer: if you want to support our cause
and the fight for the free speech in general,
EFF is the right organization to donate your money to.
Note that this plea is my own initiative: if EFF chooses to intervene and help people, they do it unconditionally.
Shortly before the EFF’s announcement,
Paul Sieminski, a General Counsel for
Automattic (
WordPress.com’s
parent company) sent an official response to Paul Duffy, refusing to
comply with the troll’s sneaky overreaching subpoena. I’m sure you will
enjoy this eloquent email and praise the business that, while having to
abide the law, actually cares about its customers and does not throw
them under the bus (as, for example, Neustar
does):
|
|
From: Paul Sieminski
Subject: Response to Subpoena to Automattic, Inc.
Date: March 8, 2013 2:39:47 PM PST
To: paduffy@wefightpiracy.com
Re: Prenda Law, Inc. v. Paul A. Godfread, Alan Cooper, et al.
Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St. Clair County, Illinois, Case No. 13-L-75
Mr. Duffy:
I write in response to Prenda Law, Inc.’s subpoena to Automattic,
Inc. (“Automattic”) (relating to the WordPress.com sites dietrolldie.com
and fightcopyrighttrolls.com). Your subpoena is legally deficient and
objectionable for numerous reasons, enumerated below, and Automattic
will not produce any documents in response to this subpoena.
- First, the subpoena purports to relate to an action pending in
Illinois, but in violation of California Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”)
Sections 2029.350 and 2029.390, it is not on the proper form for a
subpoena for production of business records in action pending outside of
California and it fails to attach a true and correct copy of the
Illinois subpoena. Indeed, the form served on Automattic is for
appearance at a trial or hearing, and in violation of the instructions
of the subpoena, you direct Automattic to serve documents to your office
and not to the clerk of the court as required.
- Second, the subpoena purports to require production of business
records in Chicago, Illinois, in violation of CCP Section 2025.250.
- Third, the subpoena was issued in Marin County, when the discovery
is to be conducted in San Francisco County, in violation of CCP Section
2029.350(b)(4).
- Fourth, the subpoena was issued on February 22, 2013, yet you demand
compliance by March 4, 2013, in violation of CCP Section 2020.410,
which requires a minimum of 20 days to respond following the issuance of
the subpoena.
- Fifth, the subpoena improperly asks Automattic to create a document
and to supply information, rather than properly asking for documents
from a nonparty.
In addition to the numerous legal deficiencies that render the subpoena invalid, it is also objectionable on numerous fronts.
- First, it seeks information protected by the First Amendment, including rights under the First Amendment to anonymous speech.
- Second, it violates the right to privacy under the California
Constitution and common law, in that it seeks information relating to
the websites that consumers visited.
- Third, it is facially (and outrageously) overly broad, in that it is
not limited to information related to any alleged defamatory posts, but
instead seeks the identity of any person who ever read the blogs in
question.
- Finally, it seeks information that is not likely to lead to discoverable information, for the reasons enumerated above.
Please contact me should you have any questions or concerns. A copy of this message will also follow by US Mail.
Paul Sieminski
General Counsel
Automattic Inc. | WordPress.com
|
No comments:
Post a Comment