Who Created Facebook? New Letter from Alleged Insider Claims Zuckerberg is a Frontman for Military Intelligence                     ~ hehe &  don't fer~geet ta fill out yer "controller" files  ta~day  boy & girls

Who created Facebook to be the ultimate surveillance tool?

Who created Facebook? Many people have wondered about the true origins of the social media giant which has gone from a Harvard startup to the company with almost the most users in the world – around 2.38 billion as of the first quarter of 2019. This is an astonishing figure which is inching its way to 1/3 (one third) of the entire global population. Are we supposed to believe the “geek genius” cover story that is used so often to describe the origins of Big Tech / Silicon Valley companies – or is there something more to the story?

New Letter from Alleged Former Facebook Insider and Former Lover of Zuckerberg

A few weeks ago on June 13th 2019, American Intelligence Media published a letter which was hand-delivered to a member of the Anonymous Patriot’s Conclave. They were able to quickly verify a lot of the information in the letter, which they are calling the Zuckerberg Dossier. Although they can’t say that everything in the letter is true, they can “state with absolute confidence that the source is real.” The letter makes many explosive claims as quoted below. I encourage you to read it for yourself. The main themes are that:

– Mark Zuckerberg did not create Facebook but was chosen as a front man to make the military surveillance social media network go public;

    – Zuckerberg was involved in CIA mind control programs as a child;
– Zuckerberg has many MIC (Military Intelligence Complex) handlers behind him who are controlling him and telling him exactly what to do;
– Zuckerberg stole code by hacking into the email account of the son of Michael McKibben, owner of Leader Technologies and the real inventor of scalable social media. Michael had emailed his son Max the white papers written to describe the new invention;
– Zuckerberg is either unable or barely able to write code, so the idea that he wrote innovative and unique code for Facebook is a giant, absurd lie.
Here are some quotes from the letter:

“Mark was chosen as child for a CIA training program because his relatives were some of the people creating the program.
I am not making excuses for Mark, but his choices have not been his own. Yes, he has become an evil sociopath who once believed in his heart-of-heart that if he decided he wanted to be president, all he had to do is say he wanted the job and “Facebook” would deliver the election to him. This is the level of brain-washing Mark is at – he is not in contact with reality.”

“He became this way through the brain-washing he received in his High School years by a DARPA program called TIA that needed a “boy-genius” to be the front man. This scam would make Mark into a global model of the young, cool, irreverent computer geniuses that “rule the world” and lead everyone to a cyber-god of artificial intelligence. Mark was just an unwitting puppet …”

“Mark Greenberg (Zuckerberg) did not write one single line of programming source code for Facebook. Those are lies and propaganda generated by his government, military handlers. Everyone knows that the Winkelvoss twins (Aaron and Cameron) won a $65 million dollar lawsuit settlement against Mark because they knew that their little HarvardConnection (HC) piece was just adjunct code attached to the original stolen source code – which was given to Mark by Professor James Chandler and IBM.”

“My old buddy, Sean Parker, an early member of Facebook has “confessed all” to the media and specifically told the truth that Facebook was meant as a cyber-drug to create and control addicts – digital addicts. As Sean said, we knew from the beginning it was harming every user and that is why we never let our friends or our children use these systems – it harms them tremendously and was the original intent of the media. Mark and I were told by representatives of DARPA that that was the intent of Facebook from its inception.”

Former Executive Sean Parker Had Previously Confessed that FB Exploited Human Psychology

Sean Parker is a former Facebook executive who publicly admitted that when Facebook was designed, exploiting loopholes in human psychology was a goal. Specifically, he mentions they built in giving people a dopamine hit every now and again to get them addicted, as well as playing off the people’s insecurity and need for social validation. He said:

““I don’t know if I really understood the consequences of what I was saying, because [of] the unintended consequences of a network when it grows to a billion or 2 billion people and … it literally changes your relationship with society, with each other … It probably interferes with productivity in weird ways. God only knows what it’s doing to our children’s brains.”

“The thought process that went into building these applications, Facebook being the first of them, … was all about: ‘How do we consume as much of your time and conscious attention as possible?’”

“And that means that we need to sort of give you a little dopamine hit every once in a while, because someone liked or commented on a photo or a post or whatever. And that’s going to get you to contribute more content, and that’s going to get you … more likes and comments.”

“It’s a social-validation feedback loop … exactly the kind of thing that a hacker like myself would come up with, because you’re exploiting a vulnerability in human psychology.”

“The inventors, creators — it’s me, it’s Mark [Zuckerberg], it’s Kevin Systrom on Instagram, it’s all of these people — understood this consciously. And we did it anyway.”
Sean Parker

Who Created Facebook? Remember Lifelog?

As I covered in a previous article Hollywood, MSM & Silicon Valley: All Strings Pulled By Same Master, Facebook just coincidentally happened to have a creation date (February 4th, 2004) identical to when the Pentagon discontinued its Lifelog project. LifeLog was a surveillance operation dreamt up by the ultra sinister DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency). Facebook is the ultimate tool for self-surveillance whereby a person will willingly give up their data and privacy without realizing what they are doing.

Final Thoughts: Who Created Facebook? Same Answer as Who Created Google, YouTube and the Rest of Silicon Valley

It remains to be seen whether the information in this letter or Zuckerberg Dossier will be verified. In answering the riddle of who created Facebook, we certainly need to recognize that, whether it’s Google/Alphabet/YouTube or Facebook, these Big Tech behemoths spun off from military projects and military seed funding right from the start. Like Amazon with its giant $600 million CIA contract, Big Tech is joined at the hip with the MIC and does its bidding. Big Tech is now a critical and indispensable cog in the US national security apparatus. It’s unprecedented and privacy-destroying surveillance – but you get free email accounts and emoticon-posting capabilities, so as Mark himself would say, it’s all cool, right?

*****

Want insight, commentary and analysis on Conspiracy, Geopolitics, Natural Health, Sovereignty, Consciousness and more? Sign up for free blog updates!
Makia Freeman is the editor of alternative media / independent news site The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the worldwide conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance. Makia is on Steemit and FB.
Sources:
*https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/
*https://aim4truth.org/2019/06/13/facebook-insider-confesses-all/
*https://www.wakingtimes.com/2017/12/11/another-facebook-executive-issues-warning-disastrous-effect-psychology-society/
*https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-09/facebook-founder-warns-god-only-knows-what-its-doing-kids-brains
*http://freedom-articles.toolsforfreedom.com/pentagon-cia-influence-tech-hollywood-msm/

Prenda's John Steele Gets 5 Years In Prison; Insists He's Really, Really, Really Sorry                ~ hehe..... finally ? :}

Say That Again

from the redeemable? dept ,,https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20190710/11280042553/prendas-john-steele-gets-5-years-prison-insists-hes-really-really-really-sorry.shtml

Wed, Jul 10th 2019 3:39pm — Mike Masnick

A month after his partner in crime Paul Hansmeier was sentenced to 14 years in prison, with scathing commentary from the judge in the case about Hansmeier and his copyright trolling scheme, John Steele has been sentenced to five years in prison in a sentencing that appeared to go quite differently than Hansmeier's. In front of the very same judge, a very different story was told. At the Hansmeier hearing, the judge said this:

"It is almost incalculable how much your abuse of trust has harmed the administration of justice," [Judge Joan] Ericksen said during the sentencing hearing in U.S. District Court in Minneapolis.

At the Steele hearing, after federal prosecutors apparently heaped praise upon Steele for confessing, and helping build the case against Hansmeier, Erickson gave Steele a chance to speak, at which point he at least put on a credible performance of contrition. He explained how he had met Hansmeier, how Paul had concocted the scheme and he joined in -- including lying to federal judges about what they were up to. From the Star Tribune's Dan Browning's excellent reporting:

First, he said, he enrolled at the University of Minnesota Law School at the age of 37 without any sense of mission other than making money. It was there that he met and befriended Hansmeier, which led to a second poor decision in April 2010.
“I’ll never forget that day,” Steele said, choking up. “I received a call from Paul Hansmeier about an idea he had about seeding pornography content online.”
The third bad decision came when federal judges around the country began questioning Hansmeier’s and Steele’s methods of filing hundreds of lawsuits to identify the owners of computers that were used to download pornography so that they could pressure them to settle to avoid public humiliation.
Steele said he could have told the judges the truth but opted to blame others and hide behind offshore companies that had technical ownership of the copyrights on the movies.

This is... a very different version of Steele. I remember the long interview he gave with Kashmir Hill where he boasted of the success he was having and mocked the idea that his copyright trolling, by threatening to expose people's porn habits, was unethical by saying:

“People don’t like to get caught doing anything wrong,” he says. “They should be embarrassed about the stealing.”

Interesting quote. Or then there's the interview Steele did with Joe Mullin in which he did his usual bluster after a judge (Otis Wright) had first called him on his bullshit trolling scam. At the time, Steele seemed overly boastful of his ability to succeed:

It's not our job to—there was no evidence against us! I think everyone, even the people that dislike anti-piracy litigation, would agree that I don't have to answer questions if I don't want to. That's my right. The fact that people take the Fifth Amendment, against compelled testimony, is not allowed to be a negative inference.
I have no involvement in this case. I've never made a misrepresentation [to the court], either me or Paul Hansmeier.
This judge is completely biased against our type of litigation. Anyone who's researched this judge knows it. There have been some very harsh rulings by this judge against intellectual property plaintiffs. I think there were some errors made, and that's why we have appellate courts.
I think the judge knows we're going to appeal. He wrote that the sanctions were designed to cost just less than [an effective appeal]. Look, you may hate me and the litigation that's gone on in the past, but most people have to be a little nervous when a judge puts out a number and says that.

In that interview, he insisted that he had "no involvement" with the shell companies AF Holdings and Ingenuity 13. Of course, part of the federal charges, which Steele admitted to in great detail in his guilty plea, was that he and Hansmeier set up AF Holdings and Ingenuity 13. In his guilty plea documents:

In or about 2011, defendants convinced R.R., the owner of Heartbreaker Productions, to transfer the copyrights to Sexual Obsession and Popular Demand to AF Holdings. In order to disguise their control over AF Holdings, defendants used the name of an acquaintance of STEELE--whose initials are A.C.--on the copyright transfer agreement to purportedly sign on behalf of AF Holdings. Furthermore, defendants represented and caused to be represented to multiple courts that AF Holdings was owned by a trust named "Salt Marsh" whose manager and sole beneficiary was M.L., a paralegal employed by STEELE and Hansmeier. In fact, and as defendants knew, M.L. was nothing more than a figurehead who agreed to pose as the owner of AF Holdings in order to help STEELE and Hansmeier obscure their ownership and control over the company.

For long time Prenda watchers, you may recognize those initials. A.C. being Alan Cooper, a former caretaker for a cabin John Steele owned, whose name Steele forged on the various documents. Cooper, having no idea what was going on, later sued over the forged documents. M.L., of course is Mark Lutz, the "paralegal" who Steele and Hansmeier falsely tried to present as the real mastermind behind everything.
This week, in court, Steele told a very different story.

He said he went back to building and rehabbing homes and began studying stoicism. He said for the past couple of years he has been working for one of his sisters in Phoenix.
“I’m trying to live a life of virtue,” Steele said. “All I can control is obviously the thoughts and actions now and in the future. I think it’s important that I stand here today and look at you and apologize.”

The Assistant US Attorney in the case heaped praise upon Steele for his cooperation, and contrasted Steele to Hansmeier in how they dealt with the charges -- including noting how much Steele's assistance helped in getting Hansmeier to plead guilty as well (though Hansmeier's was "conditional" based on some of his legal attempts to dump the case).
Judge Ericksen still noted how abusive and serious the trolling operation was, but also noted that it appeared that Steele recognized how serious this whole thing was:

“You abused the court system, as you say, for your personal ends,” she said, adding that the courts “are not a tool in the box for anybody’s hustle.”
Even so, Ericksen agreed with prosecutors that given Steele’s cooperation and efforts to turn his life around, five years in prison was “eminently fair.” ....
“I condemn the actions that you took in committing this crime. I congratulate you, however, on the actions you took” in responding to the charges, Ericksen said.

The Judge had already order Hansmeier to pay back $1.5 million, and now put that on Steele too, making the two of them "jointly and severally liable" -- effectively meaning that the two of them together need to figure out how to come up with that cash to pay back.
Given how vocal and how adamant (and, frankly, how sleazy and confident he was that he could talk his way out of any mess) Steele was over the years, consider me not totally convinced that he's really had a change of heart. It would be great if that were true, but it's going to take more than a single performance in court to convince most of us. Either way, five years in prison is still a significant prison sentence. And, now, it appears we can finally close the books on Prenda.