http://www.pakalertpress.com/2012/11/30/govt-documents-link-global-warming-to-advanced-military-climate-modification-technology/
Govt. Documents Link Global Warming to Advanced Military Climate Modification Technology
truther
November 30, 2012
Harold Saive
It’s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC
continue to push CO2 as the cause for climate change but refuse to
acknowledge the military has been actively engaged in Climate Warming
Weapons Technologies for more than twenty 20 years.
____________________________________________________
TITLE: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification”
This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of
government agencies
in perpetual and secret collaboration with each other and the military
to Modify the Global climate. Created by the elitist National Academy
of Sciences – decades of an inter-agency culture of secrecy explains why
the issue of covert aerosol Geoengineering is a taboo topic to be
degraded to the status of “
conspiracy theory”
by a matrix of complicit bureaucrats at every opportunity. This is why
your local TV “meteorologist” will rarely make a helpful comment about
an unusual sky filled with persistent jet trails.
TITLE: “The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System”. A 1986 Critique of the 1966 initiative.
This document appears as an anonymous draft intended as a critique of the US
Weather Modification Program that the author characterizes as hijacked into a military weapons system.
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Jules Verne wrote about
geoengineering the earth’s climate in 1889 in a sequel to “From the
Earth to the Moon” called “The Purchase Of The North Pole”.
Verne writes that the Baltimore Gun Club purchased large tracts of the Arctic then used the famous canon from the
earth-to-the-moon
to tilt the Earth’s axis. The goal was to establish a tropical
paradise as a profitable tourist attraction at the North Pole while
“improving” the entire global climate.
If Verne correctly predicted that man
would travel from the earth to the moon, it should be no surprise that
he also predicted that a small group of influential men would consider
warming the climate for profit.
Verne could have been inspired by
Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler who proposed diverting warm Atlantic
water into the Arctic back in 1877 – a dozen years before Verne’s
“fantastic”story was published.
____________________________________________________
Warming the Arctic with large-scale Geoengineering projects has been the vision of industrialists for 100 years – and still is
___________________________________________________
Remember when People Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
VILLAGE VOICE: “ Hey, remember when climate change was a swell idea? Coconuts were in the offing.”
“Imaginations ran wild, and The
Washington Post envisioned Manhattan becoming a tropical paradise” …
“People would be gathering oranges off the trees in Central Park, or
picking cocoanuts from palms along the Battery, [and] hunting crocodiles
off the Statue of Liberty.”
The prospect sounded so splendid to
New Yorkers that Senator William Calder (1917-1923) tried to get
$100,000 appropriated for a study of the idea. Village Voice
Remember when Scientists Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
1962 Harry Wexler
(March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT graduate and PhD in meteorology.
Wexler had been researching the link connecting chlorine and bromine
compounds to the
destruction of the stratospheric ozone layers,
but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods Hole, Mass.
Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “
The Climate of Earth and Its Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and Technology Institute.
(Source)
Wexler’s was last in a long line of
ambitious proposals to warm the Arctic. Coincidently, his proposals
were made at the same time the National Academy of Sciences was working
to create a national weather modification program – a direction in which the military had already embarked in 1958.
“Global Warming” initiatives proposed by Wexler:
- To increase the global temperature of the Earth by 1.7°C, “by injecting a cloud of ice crystals into the polar atmosphere by detonating 10 H-bombs in the Arctic Ocean
– the subject of his 1958 article in Science magazine” (Wexler H.,
1958, “Modifying Weather on a Large Scale,” Science, n.s. 128 (Oct. 31,
1958): 1059-1063).
- To diminish the global temperature by 1.2°C could be doable, “by launching a ring of dust particles into equatorial orbit, a modification of an earlier Russian proposal to warm the Arctic”.
- To destroy the ozone layer and hence increase abruptly the surface temperature of the Earth, by spraying “several hundred thousand tons of chlorine or bromine” with a stratospheric airplane. Fleming, 2007(a), pp. 56-57; Fleming, 2007(b), “note n° viii” p. 9 & p. 5 (source)
The decision to reverse direction from warming the arctic to cooling the arctic was announced in
1963 -
the year following Wexler’s death when the National Academy of Sciences
Committee on Atmospheric Sciences recommended appointment of a Panel on
Weather & Climate Modification.
pg 2
Prevailing Circumstances following WWII:
- Operation Paperclip
(Also called Operation Overcast) succeeded in recruiting scientists
from Nazi Germany for employment in the US after WW II and led to the
formation of NASA and the ICBM program.
- The National Security Act passed in 1947 made possible the rise of the military industrial complex and creation of the Central Intelligence Agency
(CIA ) to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be
conducted without public knowledge or Congressional oversight.
- Post-war advances in science and advanced physics opened up
opportunities to develop concepts of advanced thinkers like Nikola Tesla
that had been waiting on the shelf for over 50 years.
- In 1958, military application of Tesla’s little known methods of
electromagnetic manipulation of earth’s atmosphere was already
underway. White House advisor on weather modification to President
Eisenhower reported the DoD was studying ways to manipulate electrical
charges of the earth and sky in order to manipulate the weather for
purposes of national defense.
- The rise of an informed and educated middle class looked down on
proposals that employed nuclear detonations that became regarded as
dangerous and arrogant. This is not to say that proposals to mediate the
arctic climate were totally abandoned.
____________________________________________________
If warming the arctic was regarded as
good for commerce for 100 years why would a discovery that found carbon
dioxide was already performing the task for free, suddenly be regarded
as a catastrophe to prevent?
____________________________________________________
The BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico
demonstrates how Big Oil exists in a world of opportunistic pragmatism,
no matter the risk to the environment. With an established record of
corporate sociopathy, Big Oil would have little interest in what event
would cause arctic ice to retreat as long as their long-held dream of
new arctic navigation routes and access to previously ice-locked oil and
gas reserves was realized. It could make marginal difference if the
arctic temperatures rise due to (1) rising CO2 levels or (2) covert
arctic climate manipulation.
This timeline of determined
Geoengineering projects suggests the goal of mediating arctic climate
remains a favorite goal of the fossil fuel industry.
1877 Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler
proposed channeling more of the warm Kuroshio Current through the
Bering Strait to raise temperatures in the Polar region by 30 degrees.
1912, New York Engineer and Industrialist,
Carroll Livingston Riker proposed building a
200 mile jetty
off Newfoundland to increase the Gulf Stream’s flow into to the Arctic
Basin with the added benefit that it would “shift” the axis of planet
earth. The
New York Times characterized the proposal as “amazing”… but not insane.
1929: Hermann Oberth,
German-Hungarian physicist and engineer; Proposed building giant
mirrors on a space station to focus the Sun’s radiation on Earth’s
surface, making the far North habitable and freeing sea lanes to
Siberian harbors.
1945; Julian Huxley,
biologist and Secretary-General of UNESCO 1946-48; Proposed exploding
atomic bombs at an appropriate height above the polar regions to raise
the temperature of the Arctic Ocean and warm the entire climate of the
northern temperate zone.
1946 Village Voice article from 2005 reporting on theMay, 1946 issue of
Mechanix Illustrated that featured
several arctic-warming geoengineering proposals. One “brave new idea”
was proposed by Julian Huxley, then the Secretary-General of UNESCO, and
brother of Aldous Huxley, that would detonate atomic bombs to warm the
Arctic.
1958; M. Gorodsky,
Soviet engineer and mathematician, and Valentin Cherenkov, Soviet
meteorologist; Proposed placing a ring of metallic potassium particles
into Earth’s polar orbit to diffuse light reaching Earth and increase
solar radiation to thaw the permanently frozen soil of Russia, Canada,
and Alaska and melt polar ice.
1958; Arkady Markin,
Soviet engineer; Proposed that the United States and Soviet Union
build a gigantic dam across the Bering Strait and use nuclear
power–driven propeller pumps to push the warm Pacific current into the
Atlantic by way of the Arctic Sea. Arctic ice would melt, and the
Siberian and North American frozen areas would become temperate and
productive.
1958 Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov’s
proposed melting the Arctic and Greenland icecaps by spreading black
coal dust on the ice, creating cloud-cover across the poles to trap heat
and to divert warm Atlantic waters into the polar regions. This scheme
was taken seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held
in Leningrad in the early 1960′s following an initial meeting in Moscow
by the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959.
1958 Atlantic Richfield geologist
L.M. Natland, proposed exploding up to 100
underground nuclear bombs to mine the
Alberta Oil Sands.
Heat from the detonations was expected to boil the bitumen deposits,
reducing their viscosity to the point that standard drilling operations
could be used. The plan was encouraged by US efforts to find “peaceful
uses” for atomic energy. The project was approved in 1959 but the
Canadian government reversed their decision in 1962 and declared that
Canada was opposed to all forms of nuclear testing. In 2012 the
Canadian Tar Sands are, again an issue of international concern.
1962 Harry Wexler
(March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT graduate and PhD in meteorology.
Wexler had been researching the link connecting chlorine and bromine
compounds to the
destruction of the stratospheric ozone layers,
but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods Hole, Mass.
Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “
The Climate of Earth and Its Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and Technology Institute.
(Source)
____________________________________________________
It remains largely unexplained why
decades of optimism for warming the arctic was suddenly replaced with a
campaign of fear and doom for the consequences of warming the arctic
under the name of “Global Warming”
____________________________________________________
In the 1960’s Geoengineering proposals to warm the Arctic took a largely unexplained U-turn when oceanographer,
Roger Revelle’s
research
concluded that carbon dioxide was already warming the climate for free
and without the need for expensive and risky geoengineering projects.
This U-Turn of direction appeared to be a
setback with the exception of those stakeholders in the energy sector
who had been invested in arctic warming projects for decades. Did the
CO2 story finally promise to give Exxon, BP and Shell what they wanted?
If the science of Roger Revelle’s forecast for global warming turned out to be wrong or too slow, the DoD could step in – for reasons of national security - to assist arctic warming as secret component of the military’s classified weather modification and weapons program.
The 1996 Air Force document that forecasts “
Owning the Weather in 2025”
would not rule out using Tesla and plasma technologies to increase
arctic temperatures in order to disadvantage a perceived enemy. A
decision
not to intervene might betray the military’s primary objective of
“Full Spectrum Dominance”. After all, access to Oil and Gas has been a national security priority for decades.
In 1966, Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald was Chairman of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification and wrote:
“Carbon dioxide placed in the
atmosphere since the start of the industrial revolution has produced an
increase in the average temperature of the lower atmosphere of a few
tenths of a degree Fahrenheit.” Gordon MacDonald “Unless Peace Comes:
How to Wreck the Environment. Source
MacDonald was referring to
Roger Revelle
and Hans Suess paper that reversed the debate from how to warm the
arctic to how to avoid warming the arctic. Revelle’s ocean research
reported a rise in carbon dioxide in earth’s atmosphere was allegedly a
result of industrial age manufacturing and coal-burning.
Source
Revelle had worked with
the Navy in the late 1940’s to determine which projects gained funding
and successfully promoted the idea that the Navy should invest more in
“basic research”. Revelle was deeply involved in the global growth of
oceanography. He was also one of the committee chairmen in the
influential
National Academy of Sciences studies of the “
Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation” (
BEAR),
1954-1964. Revelle’s world influence was significant as president of
the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, an international group of
scientists devoted to advising on international projects. Revelle and
other scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography helped the U.S.
government to plan
nuclear weapons tests so that oceanographers might make use of the data.
Source
The conclusions of the BEAR
report were understandably significant for demonstrating the harmful
biological and environmental damage of atomic radiation and could easily
suffice to thwart geoengineering projects that recommended detonating
H-bombs. But the evidence is weak that all intentions to mediate arctic climate was totally abandoned.
If the fundamental goal to warm the
arctic remains an unspoken priority of national security in the energy
sector, the project could be taken out of public view and committee
oversight to become a classified operation in the development of the
military’s weather warfare program – an initiative that was acknowledged
by civilian weather modification programs formalized by the 1966 NASA
and ICAS charter.
____________________________________________________
Since 1958 Congress and the military
had already been working on exotic weather warfare systems that involved
electromagnetic manipulation of the ionosphere.
____________________________________________________
US Congress, Senate, Committee on
Inter-State and Foreign Commerce, Weather Modification Research,
Hearing, Washington D.C. US Govt. Printing Offlce, March 18-19, 1958;
Lowell Ponte quotes Capt. Orville as reporting “that the Dept. of
Defense was studying ways to manipulate the charges of earth and sky and
so affect the weather by means of an electronic beams to ionize or
de-ionize the atmosphere over a given area” …. Capt. Orville also
discussed ongoing US Air Force experiments with ‘sodium vapor,
ejected from jet planes to intercept solar radiation ‘ over enemy
countries and rain their weather. (The Cooling, op. cit. pp. 168-169 Source P. 42
The flip-flop from finding ways to warm
the arctic to suddenly finding ways to keep the arctic from warming was
announced in 1963 – the year following the sudden death of
Meteorologist, Harry Wexler. Having total awareness of the military’s
1958 weather weapons program, the National Academy of Sciences
(NAS) recommended the appointment of a “Panel on Weather and Climate Modification”.
source This event could serve to consolidate military and civilian weather modification programs for peaceful purposes or –
if necessary – as covert weather modification and even
climate warming operations secretly carried out by the military under the catch-all justification of “national security”.
FOLLOW THE MONEY:
Lobbyists for Big Oil publicly claim Global Warming is a hoax while
quietly investing billions in new drilling opportunities due to the
reality of receding arctic ice. The energy sector has made huge
investments in ice-breakers and drilling equipment to profit from the
very global warming they are reluctant to acknowledge. The position of
having your cake while eating it is essential. When arctic climate
warming is revealed as a military climate modification operation, big
oil can fall back on “we told you so”. Since governments may come and
go over the next 100 years, they calculate the demand for oil – and the
companies who drill for it – will remain intact.
- “As the polar ice cap retreats, energy companies are looking north for a potentially huge new source of crude” Source
- “Shell is one of six companies planning to extract oil, gas and
minerals in the Arctic as global warming melts ice and opens new sea
lanes to commerce.” Source
- “Remote and dangerous sources of arctic oil are becoming
increasingly attractive as the global need for oil grows and the
existing reserves dry up.” Source
____________________________________________________
Documents from 1966 reveal how the military and federal agencies are modifying the global climate.
____________________________________________________
TITLE: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification”
This set of documents from 1966 reveals a network of
government agencies
in perpetual and secret collaboration , working with the military to
Geoengineer the climate. Created as an agenda of the elitist
National Academy of Sciences
– decades of an inter-agency culture of secrecy explains why the issue
of covert aerosol Geoengineering is a taboo topic to be degraded to the
status of “
conspiracy theory”
by every government agency in this web of complicit bureaucrats at
every opportunity. This is why your local TV “meteorologist” will
rarely make a helpful comment about an unusual sky filled with
persistent jet trails.
- 1966, JUN: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” Prepared by the ICAS select Panel on Weather Modification
- 1966: NOV: A Recommended National Program in Weather Modification – A
Report to the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences
(ICAS) by Homer E. Newell – Associate Administrator for Space Science
and Applications, NASA, Washington, D.C.
- 1966: APPENDIX I – Panel on Weather and Climate Modification to Committee on Atmospheric Sciences NAS-NRC – Membership Recommendations
- 1966: APPENDIX II – Special Commission on Weather Modification – National Science Foundation Membership Recommendations.
- 1966: APPENDIX III
Report prepared by the ICAS Select Panel on Weather Modification;
“Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate
Modification,” dated June 20, 1966
- 1966: APPENDIX IV
Memorandum for Dr. Homer E. Newel1 from J. Herbert Hollomon, Chairman,
ICAS, Subject: National Weather Modification Program, dated June 21,
1966
- 1966: APPENDIX V
NASA Panel to Study Weather Modification Activities; Membership,
Chronology of Meetings, and a Compilation of Supporting Material used by
the Panel
- 1966: APPENDIX VI Budget Recommendations and Trends for a National Weather Modification Program
1966 – NASA: A Recommended
National Program in Weather Modification – A report to the Independent
Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E. Newell – Associate
administrator for Space Science and Applications, NASA, Washington, DC.
In 1966, a report from NASA to ICAS (Independent Committee for Atmospheric Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences, NAS)
was the first step in establishing a national Weather modification
program that would ultimately involve multiple federal agencies. The
report focused on four initial agencies: ESSA, NSF, NASA, and the Dept. of Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation.
Under Recommended Principals it
was noted that (a) each agency would be independently funded while
stressing inter-agency cooperation in research. Independent funding of
agencies could make the program less conspicuous and more difficult for
Congress to defund. Also, new agencies could be brought on board
without high profile budget hearings. (b) A designated “central” agency
– while having responsibility for focusing the national program – would
not have any real authority to implement programs, leaving those
decisions to probable unidentified civilian lobbyists and DoD
“stakeholders”.
Although the theme of the ICAS report is
in the context of protecting water, agriculture, forests, lands and
natural resources, the knowledge gained from climate manipulation was
of more immediate interest to the military and their industrial
complex.
Thirty years following the creation of the Nation Program in Weather Modification, the US Air Force published a document
(“
Owning The Weather in 2025”
) establishing that federal agencies involved in the National Weather Modification program are under tacit authority of the
Department of Defense.
Owning the Weather in 2025 – Opening Statement: Current
technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone
who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns
and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current
demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global
stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups
to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.
In the United States,
weather-modification will likely become a part of national security
policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government
will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various
levels. These levels could include unilateral actions, participation in a
security framework such as NATO, membership in an international
organization such as the UN, or participation in a
coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy includes
weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy will
naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational
capability would provide, another motivation to pursue
weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.
In this paper we show that
appropriate application of weather-modification can provide battlespace
dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the future, such
operations will enhance air and space superiority and provide new
options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness.1 “The
technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;”2 in 2025
we can “Own the Weather
_______________________________________________________
Case Study 2
A 1986 Critique of the 1966 National Weather Modification Initiative
The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System
_______________________________________________________
This document appears
as an anonymous draft intended as a critique of the US Weather
Modification Program that the author characterizes as hijacked into a
military weapons system.
The final draft is not yet located.
For over 100 years, experts and authors
were advocating geoengineering projects warm the arctic. The public, at
large, was entertained by these concepts even when suggestions to
detonate hydrogen bombs over the north pole were advocated by a
nationally recognized weather expert in 1962.
It’s revealing that initial proposals to
solve the newly discovered CO2 “warming” problem had less to do with
cutting back on carbon emissions and more to do with a rush to release
toxic atmospheric aerosols without first, researching the hazards. The
specter of polluting the atmosphere, blocking sunlight and causing the
release of huge volumes of CO2 from the jet aircraft aerosol sorties is
an obvious public health and strategic concern that requires years of
research that the government was unwilling to legislate and fund.
Therefore, the impatience with which these chemical aerosol schemes
were promoted suggests that emergency steps to cool the planet with
aerosols was never the primary mission.
____________________________________________________
In 1962, Geoenginnering efforts to warm
the arctic were widely entertained but in 1966 it was top priority to
prevent the arctic from warming by even one degree.
____________________________________________________
Trojan Horse?: Under
the military’s vision to Own the Weather Weather in 2025 atmospheric
warming with ionospheric and plasma weapons is an established
capability. The numerous agencies inside the National Weather and
Climate Modification program are actively guarding the military’s
aerosol and energy weapons program with stiff denials to the public and
media whenever the issue of “chemtrails” is a story on local radio or TV
stations.
It’s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC
continue to push CO2 as the cause for climate change but refuse to
acknowledge the military has been actively engaged in climate
modification since the mid 1990′s?
An abrupt reversal of policy from
promoting arctic climate mediation to preventing Global Warming resulted
in ideas that both polluted the atmosphere AND became a source of
Global Warming.
Just as the ICAS/NASA National Weather
Modification program is being formalized the record shows most ideas to
cool the planet suddenly involve bazaar schemes to spray or disburse
particles, biology and dust into the atmosphere and oceans. These are
the same people who – just a few months earlier, were eagerly lining up
to hear Wexler talk about ways to warm the planet with hydrogen bombs,
destruction of the OZONE and orbital particles.
While most of us realize that many of
these proposals from respected experts would be catastrophic to the
environment, not all of these draconian ideas have been rejected, even
as increasing evidence determines that deploying chemicals into the
atmosphere does more harm than good.
Deployment of geoengineering aerosols as observed in practice for two decades is now regarded as a source of global warming – not a fix.:
____________________________________________________
Geoengineering Aerosols Are Warming the Atmosphere and Are a Source of Global Warming
____________________________________________________
In 2007, investigator, Cliff Carnicom calculated the impact of the current unacknowledged aerosol deployment into the atmosphere and concludes:
“It can be seen from this model that
the results of artificial aerosol introduction into the lower
atmosphere can be of a magnitude quite on par with the extraordinary
impacts projected by even modest and conservative global warming models
upon humans in the near future. As the model presented herein is
intended to be reasonably conservative, the impact of the aerosol
operations could be much greater than these results show. It is advised
that the citizens consider the viability and merit of this model in the
examination of the global warming issue, and that they openly take
aggressive action to halt the intentional aerosol operations.
This paper is late in its offering,
as my availability for continued research at this level is limited. I
am nevertheless hopeful that the information can be evaluated and
assimilated into the many rationales and arguments that have developed
over the last decade to cease the intentional alteration of the
atmosphere of our planet.” – Cliff Carnicom Complete study
____________________________________________________
Geoengineering Proposals to Warm the Arctic Are Replaced by Fear of Global Warming
____________________________________________________
- 1965; President’s Science Advisory Committee,
United States; Proposal: Investigated injecting condensation or freezing
nuclei into the atmosphere to counteract the effects of increasing
carbon dioxide.
- 1977; Cesare Marchetti, Italian industrial
physicist; Coined the term “geoengineering” and proposed sequestering
CO2 in the deep ocean.
- 1983; Stanford Penner, A. M. Schneider, and E. M.
Kennedy, American physicists; Suggested introducing small particles into
the atmosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space.
- 1988; John H. Martin, American oceanographer;
Proposed dispersing a relatively small amount of iron into appropriate
areas of the ocean to create large algae blooms that could take in
enough atmospheric carbon to reverse the greenhouse effect and cool
Earth.
- 1989; James T. Early, American climatologist
suggested deflecting sunlight by 2 percent with a $1 trillion to $10
trillion “space shade” placed in Earth orbit.
- 1990; John Latham, British cloud physicist;
Proposed seeding marine stratocumulus clouds with seawater droplets to
increase their reflectivity and longevity.
- 1992; NAS Committee on Science, Engineering, and
Public Policy proposed adding more dust to naturally occurring
stratospheric dust to increase the net reflection of sunlight.
- 1998: International Space Station (ISS): The first modular component of the International Space Station
(ISS) was launched and is the current (in 2012) habitable artificial
satellite in low Earth orbit following the Salyut, Almaz, Skylab and
Mir. (1998 ISS mission consistent with same year increase in jet aerosol public observations and complaints) The
stated function of the SSI is to provide an international space
platform for research and experimentation in the fields of biology,
human biology, physics, astronomy, meteorology (weather) and other fields.
- 2010: Geoengineer, David Keith (AAAS Meeting)
proposal to use jet aircraft to spray Sulfur dioxide and aluminum
nano-particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space.
In 1968, Gordon J. F. MacDonald authored a chapter in “
Unless Peace Comes“
where he correctly predicted that future means of obtaining
national objectives by force hinges on man’s ability to control and
manipulate the environment of planet Earth.
“When achieved, this power over his
environment will provide man with a new force capable of doing great and
indiscriminate damage. Our present primitive understanding of
deliberate environmental change makes it difficult to imagine a world in
which geophysical warfare is practised. Such a world might be one in
which nuclear weapons were effectively banned and the weapons of mass destruction
were those of environmental catastrophe. As I will argue, these weapons
are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars.”
“To consider the consequences of
environmental modification in struggles among nations, we need to
consider the present state of the subject and how postulated
developments in the field could lead, ten to fifty years from now, to
weapons systems that would use nature in new and perhaps unexpected
ways. “
More Than Owning the Weather in 2025
The confidence and enthusiasm expressed in the USAF 1996 document:
Owning the Weather in 2025 was supported by the advent of scalar weapons technologies during the Reagan Star War years. The document promises: “
weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. The
“never before imagined” comment speaks directly to the HAARP
ionospheric heater facility, the Bernard Eastlund patents and military
strategies for global military dominance. This scenario of weather
control harkens to the predictive warning from Gordon MacDonald in
chapter in the book:
Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck the Environment.
Source
Timeline for Owning the Weather: From 1987-1992 ATPI scientists build on Bernard Eastlund’s patents for development of new weapon capabilities
In 1994 ATPI is bought by E-Systems with
a contract to build the biggest ionospheric heater in the world
(HAARP). — In 1995, Raytheon bought E-Systems and old APTI patents. —
In 1996 the Air Force publishes: Owning The Weather in 2025
In his 2011 book,
Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet, scientist and author,
Tim Flannery
reminds us that proposals to melt the Icecaps were advanced after World
War II by reputable figures including the first director-general of
UNESCO (Julian Huxley-1946), by a top official at the U.S. Weather
Bureau, and by a Russian oil engineer
Petr Mikhailovich Borisov.
Scientific conferences debated the merits, while mining and energy
corporations contemplated the use of nuclear detonations in the
extraction of coal and oil.
Reputable figures in the international
community saw an opportunity to detonate nuclear weapons as a novel and
constructive way to geoengineer the Arctic. The prevailing rationale to
justify method included: (1) The arctic is nearly too cold to be
habitable by humans (2) The polar ice cap blocks valuable shipping
lanes. (3) The expanses of frigid water up North contributes to
uncomfortably cold winters in many countries. (4) difficulty of drilling
for oil through ice.
The idea was publicly floated as a “peaceful use” of atomic weapons.
Flannery offers this example as evidence of humanity’s seeming propensity for hastening its own extinction.
Here on Earth:
A Natural History of the Planet - By Tim Flannery.
Book Reviewby Mark Engler
Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov’s Proposed Method of Melting the Arctic Icecap
Borisov’s idea: If
the Arctic ice is once melted much less of the sun’s radiation will be
reflected out into space and therefore the arctic ice cap will not
re-form. An ice-free Arctic Ocean would be a great boon to oceanic
shipping, especially between Europe and East Asia. Much land in northern
Canada and Siberia would be freed of permafrost and made suitable for
agriculture. Borisov believed that an ice-free Arctic Ocean would lead
to increased evaporation of water and hence increased rainfall
worldwide, including the region of Sahara Desert leading to grass
growing there. Borisov considers all of the impacts of the melting of
the Arctic ice cap to be beneficial. He asserts that the melting of the
Greenland ice cap would raise sea levels at a rate of only 1.5 to 2 mm
per year.
This scheme was taken seriously by
Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held in Leningrad in the
early 1960′s following an initial meeting in Moscow by the Presidium of
the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959. Borisov’s suggestions to warm the arctic included:
- Covering great areas of the Arctic with black powders such as coal dust (G. Veksler, 1959) (Carbon Black?)
- Dispersing the cloud cover over the central Arctic Basin (D. Fletcher, 1958) (Geoengineering Aerosols?)
- Deepening of the Thomson Sill (V.N. Stepanov, 1963)
- Covering the water surface with a monomolecular film (M. Budyko, 1962)
- Installations to direct warmer Atlantic water into the Kara Sea (V.P. P’yankov, 1965)
- Pumping cold Arctic water into the Pacific to draw warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Basin (P.M. Borisov, c. 1968)
This concept also required construction of a dam across the Bering Strait. Source: P.M. Borisov, “Can we Control the Arctic Climate?”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March, 1969, pp. 43-48.
In a
related scheme, a proposal was floated to store nuclear waste in the
Antarctic. The plan would allow specially designed canisters of
hot radioactive waste to melt down through the ice until it reached the “ice-rock interface” where it would
supposedly remain in cold storage for 250,000 years.
The following Timeline is from the book, “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP” Advances in Tesla Technology
by Jeanne Manning and Dr. Nick Begich and contains disturbing facts
about the little known history of our Government’s use of scalar
technologies to modify the weather. Additional events and links were
inserted in 2012 to update the list.
Timeline of public and covert testing and development of energy weapons
- 1886-8: Nikola Tesla invents system of Alternating
Current power source and transmission system. As 60-pulse-per-second
(hertz) AC power grids spread over the land, Earth’s resonance frequency
will eventually dance to a different beat than her usual 7-8 hertz .
- 1900: Tesla applies for patent for a device to transmit Electrical
Energy “Through the Natural Mediums”. U.S. Patent #787,412 issued in
1905
- 1924: Confirmation that radio waves bounce off ionosphere (electrically-charged layer starting at altitude of 50 kilometers).
- 1938: Scientist proposes to light up night sky by electron gyrotron heating from a powerful transmitter.
- 1940: Tesla announces “death ray” invention.
- 1945: Atomic bomb tests begin 40,000 electromagnetic pulses to follow.
- 1952: W.O. Schumann identifies 7.83 hertz resonant frequency of the earth.
- 1958: Van Allen radiation belts discovered (zones of charged
particles trapped in earth’s magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. VA Belt
violently disrupted with nuclear detonations
- 1958: Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes 3 nuclear bombs in Van Allen belt.
- 1958: As far back as 1958, the chief White House
adviser on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the DoD
was studying “ways to manipulate the charges of the Earth and sky and
so affect the weather by using an electronic beam to ionise or de-ionise
the atmosphere over a given area.
- 1960: Series of weather disasters begin.
- 1961 – Project Skywater – Bureau of Reclamation (water) cloud seeding project funded by Congress.
- 1961: Copper needles dumped into ionosphere as “telecommunications shield”.
- 1961: Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 1960′s
the dumping of chemicals (barium powder etc.) from satellites/rockets
began.
- 1961-62: Soviets and USA blast many EMPs in atmosphere, 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer estimated at 4%.
- 1962: Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma resonances by antennas within the space plasma.
- 1966, June, Report to ICAS by
ICAS Select Panel – Chair, Gordon JF MacDonald. “Future plans of Federal
Agencies in Weather and Climate Modification.”
- 1966, Nov, report from NASA to ICAS (Independent
Comm. for Atmospheric Sciences of the Nat. Academy of Sciences, NAS) was
first step in establishing a National Weather Modification program
- 1966: Gordon J. F. MacDonald
publishes military ideas on environmental engineering. MacDonald was
Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification.
- 1960′s: In Wisconsin, US Navy Project Sanguine lays ELF antennae.
- 1968: Moscow scientists tell the West that Soviets pinpointed which
pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and physiological
functions and which do harm.
- 1968: Gordon JF MacDonald authors
chapter in book: “Unless peace Comes – a scientific forecast of new
weapons” MacDonald was Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and
Climate Modification.
- 1969: Hail Suppression Data from Western North Dakota, 1969–1972 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City.
- 1972: First reports on “ionospheric heater”
experiments with high frequency radio waves, at Arecibo. 100-megawatt
heater in Norway built later in decade; can change conductivity of
auroral ionosphere.
- 1972:
Potential Value of Satellite Cloud Pictures in Weather Mod. Projects –
Report prepared for NASA by Institute of Atmospheric Sciences South
Dakota School of Mines and Technology Rapid City.
- 1973: Documentation that launch of Skylab and associated rocket
exhaust gases `’halved the total electron content of the ionosphere for
three hours.
- 1973: Recommendations for study of Project Sanguine’s biological effects denied by Navy.
- 1974: United Nations General Assembly bans environmental warfare. ENMOD
- 1974: High-frequency experiments at Plattesville, Colorado; Arecibo,
Puerto Rico; and, Armidale, New South Wales heat “bottom side of
ionosphere”.
- 1974: Experiments airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in ionosphere with accelerated electrons.
- 1975: Evaluation of Monte Carlo Tests of Effectiveness of Cloud Seeding on Growing Season Rainfall in North Dakota.
- 1975: Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that VLF from power lines is altering the ionosphere.
- 1975: U. S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces Navy to release research
showing that ELF transmissions can alter human blood chemistry.
- 1975: Pell Senate Subcommittee urges that weather and climate
modification work be overseen by civilian agency answerable to U.S.
Congress. No action taken.
- 1975: Soviets begin pulsing “Woodpecker” ELF waves, at key brainwave
rhythms. Eugene, Oregon, one of locations where people were
particularly affected.
- 1976: Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show nerve cells affected by ELF fields.
- 1977: Environmental Impacts of Precipitation Management – Inferences to Project Skywater
- 1979: Launch of NASA’s third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory
causes large-scale, artificially-induced depletion in the ionosphere.
Plasma hole caused by “rapid chemical processes” between rocket exhaust
and ozone layer.” …“ionosphere was significantly depleted over a
horizontal distance of 300 km for some hours.”
- 1979: Annotated Bibliography of Predictor Variables for Weather Modification Applications - Funded by NSF Grant ATM 79-05007 pub., Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana.
- 1985: Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent “Method and Apparatus
for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, ionosphere and/or
Magnetosphere,” (First of 3 Eastlund patents assigned to ARCO Power
Technologies Inc.)
- 1986: US Navy Project Henhouse duplicates Delgado (Madrid)
experiment — very low-level, very-low-frequency pulsed magnetic fields
harm chick embryos. 20
- 1987: In the later part of the decade the U.S.
begins network of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to
generate Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves for defense purposes .
- 1987-92: Other APTI scientists build on Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities.
- 1994: Military contractor E-Systems buys APTI,
holder of Eastlund patents and contract to build biggest ionospheric
heater in world (HAARP).
- 1994: Congress freezes funding on HAARP until
planners increase emphasis on earth-penetrating tomography uses, for
nuclear counter proliferation efforts. (Oil and gas exploration)
- 1995-1997: Public complaints accumulate across the
US regarding unusual cloud formations and sudden increase in observable
persistent jet contrails that appear unnaturally under dry atmospheric
conditions. These observations are accompanied by complaints of
biological specimens and web formations that appear to fall from the
sky. Many instances of qualified lab analysis reveal high concentration
of aluminum, barium and other elements that are consistent with DoD
electromagnetic experiments
- 1995: Raytheon buys E-Systems and old APTI patents.
The technology is now hidden among thousands of patents within one of
the largest defense contractor portfolios.
- 1995: Congress budgets $10 million for 1996 under “nuclear counterproliferation” efforts for HAARP project.
- 1995: Test of patent number 5,041,834 to generate an Artificial
Ionospheric Mirror (AIM), or a plasma layer in the atmosphere. The AIM
is used like the ionosphere to reflect RF energy over great distances.
- 1994-6: Testing of first-stage HAARP (euphemistically named High frequency Active Auroral Research Program) equipment continues, although funding was frozen.
- 1996: HAARP scientists test the earth-penetrating tomography
applications by modulating the electroject at Extremely Low Frequencies
(ELF)
- 1998: Projected date for fully-operating HAARP system.
- 2009: Operation HAMP – Department of Homeland Security operation to Modify and Steer Hurricanes with Geoengineering Aerosols
- 2012:
Celebrating 50 years of Success. A Compilation of highlights from the
Institute of Atmospheric Sciences at South Dakota School of Mines &
Technology Rapid City.
____________________________________________________
The World is Waking Up to State Crimes of Climate Warming and Violent Weather by Combinations of Powerful Electromagnetic Energy Weapons and Aerosol Geoengineering
____________________________________________________
It was in the mid- 1990′s when the US
public a were suddenly confronted with unexplained changes in the sky
that included bazaar new cloud formations and new types of jet contrails
that persisted in the skies for hours even while the relative humidity
was very low at the altitudes where the jets were flying. These
observed changes were coincident with events following the 1994
E-Systems purchase of APTI, also holder of plasma physicist, Bernard Eastlund’s patents and contracts to build the world’s largest ionospheric heater (HAARP).
The history of the 1966 National weather
Modification Program and the coincidence of events around the time of
bazaar new cloud formations is sufficient reason to pursue the
relationship of persistent jet aerosols to the ionospheric heater
experiments at the HAARP facility and Gakona, AK, Aricebo, PR and many
more similar facilities brought online in recent years.
The ongoing depletion of earth’s
protective OZONE layer is a known risk to manipulation of the ionosphere
with powerfully heated beams of
electromagnetic radiation. Pollution from the Shuttle missions, alone has accounted for rapid ozone depletion according to NASA’s own documents.
Further damage results when chemical
aerosols deployed over either polar region traps heat in the troposphere
resulting in a rise in surface temperatures to endanger normal
formation of seasonal ice with an associated plunge in stratospheric
temperatures into the range of -109 deg. F. with the formation of
chemically contaminated ice crystals that react with sunlight to further
deplete the OZONE.
From 2009 to 2012 persistent jet
chemical aerosols are clearly observed over the North Polar regions on
many satellite images and ground-based photographs. It is no surprise
that NASA now reports new OZONE depletion in far northern latitudes
where none was previously detected.
It’s no secret that government agencies,
the military and commercial interests of the US and abroad have
invested in a radical scalar system of weather modification that is now
revealed to have far too many unintended negative consequences to
sustain life on earth.
Continuation of this vast and
terra-deforming aerosol geoengineering operation will only confirm that
one agenda is to deplete the arctic ice – a concept that has been
embraced by influential men, Oil companies and nations for nearly 100
years.
The government, military, IPCC, UN and
corporate stakeholders can no longer pretend to be desperately concerned
about global warming and climate change while the world is waking up to
realize these same entities are participating in the deployment of
electromagnetic weapons and aerosols of massive climate destruction as a monstrous and Orwellian hoax on humanity.
Related Links:
___________________________________________________________
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:
NikolaTesla, Inventor of the Death Ray, died in Jan, 1943 wherein the FBI took possession of his papers and documents.
After WWII, Operation “Overcast” (Later
named opertion Paper Clip) was a US program to employ NAZI regime
scientists in US laboratories.
The National Security Act, passed in 1947 Created the
Central Intelligence Agency and made possible the rise of the military industrial complex
to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted without public knowledge or Congressional oversight.
In 1958, the military announced they
were experimenting on the ionosphere with electronic beams for the
purpose of manipulating the weather.
In 1962 Respected Meteolrologist Harry Wexler proposed geoengineering strategies to warm the planet.
In 1963 the National Academy of
Scientists proposed formation of a panel to create a “National Weather
and Climate Modification Program”.
In 1966 Plans to warm the arctic were
abandoned without comment to be replaced with warnings that CO2 was
already causing the atmosphere to get warmer.
This video introduces the article. Global Warming Linked to Advanced Climate Change Technology.
The title sounds provocative but NASA
has concluded that man-made, persistent contrails are exacerbating
global warming and could contribute to long-term changes in Earth’s
climate.
The article explores the forgotten
history of America’s National Weather and Climate Modification Program –
Still in existance - and how it rapidly evolved into a
military/civilian weather warfare program of mass destruction.
The documentation and subsequent critique reveals a program that went
into rapid mission creep when the military became involved. The
critique was drafted in 1986 by a member of the Union of Atomic
Scientists.
The record shows that industrialists and
their scientists have been looking for ways to warm the arctic for 100
years beginning in 1877 when Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler proposed
diverting warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Sea.
Decades of arctic warming proposals
followed until 1962 when respected MIT meteorologist, Harry Wexler
proposed 3 schemes to increase the global temperature of the Earth by
1.7°C,:
(1) Detonate 10 hydrogen bombs in the arctic ocean to send ice crystals into the polar atmosphere
(2) Destroy the ozone layer by using aircraft to spray chlorine or bromine into the stratosphere .
(3) Launch dust particles into equatorial orbit to diffuse light to heat to warm the polar regions.
These ideas sound pretty frightening
today, but in 1962 Wexler’s ideas were gaining traction and nobody
“important” was calling him a lunatic. But following Wexler’s untimely
death that same year the problem of how to warm the planet completely
reversed polarity.
Suddenly – and without explanation - it was now imperative to find ways
to cool the planet and to keep the atmosphere from warming.
The U-turn in national direction came
about when a paper was published by oceanographer, Roger Revelle who
claimed earth’s atmosphere was warming due to a buidup of carbon dioxide
from burning coal back in the industrial age.
The new narrtive became “official” for
media consumption in 1966 when Gordon MacDonald – Chairman of the new
ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification stated: “Carbon
dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the start of the industrial
revolution has produced an increase in the average temperature of the
lower atmosphere of a few tenths of a degree Fahrenheit.”
Wexler’s proposals to warm the planet
were never mentioned again but remained quietly popular with
stakeholders in the oil and energy markets who had always seen vast
opportunities for new shipping lanes and drilling as soon as the ice
melted a bit.
In view of NASA’s position that man-made persistent contrails are exacerbating global warming – what are we to think?
If these man-made clouds are normal
water vapor we have a problem that accelerates global warming. But If
the problem can be fixed, and no governrnment authority has yet thought
it was important enough to take immediate action we can reasonably
assume that warming the climate with persistent contrails is a tolerable
or even desired outcome.
And if If man-made clouds are revealed
to be chemical aerosols deliberately sprayed into the atmosphere we can
reasonably assume that heating the atmosphere is a hidden agenda inside a
covert aerosol operation that mimmicks the appearance of a
geoengineering plan to cool the planet. In reality, the chemical
aerosol operations provide plausible deniablity to spectators that our
benevolent government is secretly spraying the skies to test ways to
mitigate global warming for the good of humanity.
This plausible deniaility is taught to
us through media coverage of geoengineers lake David Keith who presents
aerosol “cooling” strategies in frequent public appearances that are –
in turn – presented as news in multiple media sources..
So, the agenda to warm the planet is
cleverly hidden in plain sight disguised as an undisclosed but
benevolent government program to test aerosol spraying to cool the
planet if we should ever decide it’s necessary. Meanwhile, arctic ice
continues to retreat despite decades of “testing”.
Aerosols are not the sole requirement in
advanced climate change technology. High energy ionospheric heaters,
Tesla Arrays, and exotic electromagnetic devices are required to
interact with chemical aerosols in ways that normal water vapor
contrails never could.
Posts
Searching engine: Racks of networking equipment connect servers inside a Google data center in Council Bluffs, Iowa.
