5/25: HAVE YOU CHIPPED THE CHILDREN?

5/25: HAVE YOU CHIPPED THE CHILDREN?

~ hehe Y is IT "they" only EVER tell US about ALL the so~called bennnnnies of "their" evil fucking shit HUH ????  y is that  ...folks whats ta say "they" or any other evil fuck wants to use these"chips" 4 evil purposes ..ya know like turn off your pace maker ,"shoot" the "wrong" dose in yer IV or take over yer car,plane,train, voting machine ... & on &on &on& fucking ON  humm  ....nawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww   "nobody" ever uses "tech" 4 evil ...ends  nope  Oops   it's 4 the kids  u c ??? just ask ole billy "the vaccine guy/ micro~spy guy " gates of hell or hows 'bout u's trust those ole nazi's & go geet in the .... shower

HAVE YOU CHIPPED THE CHILDREN?

On many shows, I have decried the pervasive surveillance apparatus that has been implemented all over the world. It is now a reality the surveillance state has now evolved into a society that accepts and even demands surveillance.
No longer can we speak of it in future tense because our everyday lives are subjected to surveillance encounters 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
Some surveillance encounters obtrude our routine, like getting a ticket for running a red light when no one is there except a camera on the corner. However, the majority of the surveillance encounters are part of everyday life and is for the most part, unremarkable.
Massive surveillance systems now underpin modern existence.
Big Brother watches us on a daily basis; we wind up on camera surveillance hundreds of times a day. But there are other things that are used watch and monitor us on a daily basis like supermarket loyalty cards, coded access cards to get in the office, and cell phones.
It is that these systems represent a basic, complex infrastructure which assumes that gathering and processing personal data is vital to contemporary living.
Surveillance is two-sided; it is convenient, and, benefits us in many ways. Yet at the same time, risks and dangers are always present in large-scale systems and of course, power does corrupt or at least skews the vision of those who wield it.
Many people believe that certain types of surveillance technologies are intrusive like the use of biometrics such as fingerprints or iris scans. However, the most controversial proposed surveillance technology is the introduction of the subcutaneous RFID chip.
Recently, the so-called conspiracy theory crowd has been running through the internet news cycle a story that in December of this year, all children in the European Union will be chipped at birth.
Public clinics in the European Union are said to have been alerted. This chip will be linked to a satellite through a powerful GPS sensor and it is said the GPS chip will have an edge of error of about 5 meters when tracking a child and is said to be beneficial in finding lost or kidnapped children.

All children born after 2014 will be getting the chip and all confirmation for those children will be required beginning in 2020.
The data, collected from one or more sensors in the body, would be transmitted to cell phones or tablets where apps would give parents and pediatricians insights into the baby’s health and condition in “real-time,” but what many people do not realize is that this technology exists now, and has already been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in humans. Not only do these chips “silently and invisibly” store and transmit personal data, but they can also be encoded to perform a variety of other functions.
Now, there are skeptics who have declared that all of this is bunk or an urban legend. They claim there is no proof that this will happen and yet there are sources that are not featured in conspiracy websites where we have to wonder what is in store for children, and the elderly with regard to utilizing the technology of the subcutaneous RFID chip.
In 2006, a published report entitled “A Report on the Surveillance Society” proposed locating and tracking once reserved for pets, will be used for children, the elderly, the mentally challenged, and to any adult who voluntarily wants the chip implanted under their skin.
The report emphasizes that the most accurate referencing in a surveillance society would be the mandatory use of Geographical Information Systems which would actually track the geographical movements of people, vehicles or commodities using RFID chips.
It also documents that both GPS and RFID are increasingly being seen as solutions in law enforcement and personnel management. Electronic monitoring has also been introduced as a condition of being granted bail and in 2004, some 631 adults and 5751 juveniles, some as young as twelve years old, were ‘tagged’ allowing them to await trial at home rather than be remanded into custody.
Offenders released from prison are also increasingly subjected to electronic monitoring either as a condition of early release from prison under the Home Detention Curfew Scheme or as a condition of being released on parole.
The first human use of RFID chips has been in elderly people suffering from degenerative diseases in the United States, and around 70 people with degenerative brain conditions have now been implanted to enable care takers to locate them easily. Researchers and technological enthusiasts have also been implanting themselves with chips for several years, and at least one chain of Spanish nightclubs has offered patrons the chance to have cash and access privileges held on implanted chips. However, an even bolder action occurred in February 2006 when a security company on Ohio, implanted two of its workers with RFID chips to allow them to access company property. CityWatcher.com, a private video surveillance company, said it was testing the technology as a way of controlling access to a room where it holds security video footage for government agencies and the police.
Although such an invasive procedure was carried out voluntarily, it raises enormous questions of the integrity of the body and privacy in relation to employers. It is also not entirely surprising that the call for everyone to be implanted is now being seriously debated now, especially the idea of parents implanting children with RFID in order to locate them.

We don’t think twice about having the vet put microchips in our dogs and cats if they can help reunite a missing pet with its family. But how willing would you be to have a microchip embedded in your children?
According to a widely distributed NBC News Report, putting microchips in children will happen “sooner rather than later.”
The WFLA report that challenges the debunkers who say that chipping is myth – electronics experts are now saying that microchipping children is safe and effective, and that Americans eventually will come to accept the process to insure their kids’ safety. One day, the report says, it will become as common as barcodes.
The report features a Tampa Bay mother of a special needs child who is prone to trust strangers, and has given her a few moments of panic. The mom says that if it will keep her children safe, it’s anything but extreme.
The report then features an electronics expert who says that microchip testing in humans is already happening: “The military is not only testing this out, but already utilizes its properties,” says Stuart Lipoff. “It’s not a matter of if it will happen, but when.”
The question is obvious: would you be willing to have your children embedded with a chip if it will help guarantee their safety? What if everyone had to be mandatorily chipped in the advent of a National Security measure? I know that TSA lines are longer; wouldn’t it be more convenient to have a chip inside you that would clear you for flights before hand?
If it was a law to be chipped or have your children chipped, would you break the law?
Would you support the chipping and tagging of refugees entering your country?
Pressure is on to find IDs that work for several purposes – border crossing, fraud control, access to government information and perhaps commercial and semi-commercial identification as well. The key problem is that once established, systems can easily acquire an apparent life of their own which is much easier to initiate than to halt or redirect.
Agendas such as the ‘war on terror,’ curbing the migration of undesirable groups and even the quest for solutions for credit card fraud, are shaping the development of RFID systems.
Chips are also being proposed for health monitoring as nanoparticles can be embedded in each chip that can provide vital information in a health emergency.
We are moving into a time when the extraordinary advances that have been made in the fields of nanotechnology, neurology, psychology, computer science, telecommunications and artificial intelligence, will be used for health monitoring, surveillance, and direct communication to the human brain.
The temptation to use these emerging technologies to control the public will become almost irresistible to the technocracy and many people feel that in the future governments will require chips with nanotech be injected into the populace for this purpose.
Nanotechnology is a manipulation of matter and works with the very basic building blocks of life. The scale is incredibly small: one nano-meter is one-billionth of a meter. So, it’s invisible, rarely listed in ingredients although there are more than an estimated 1,000 products now on the market – no one knows the exact number of products; and it is unregulated and untested for either short or long-term dangers.

Products using nanotechnology are found in: cosmetics including sunscreens and anti-aging creams, medicines, energy, electronics, clothes [for example, to make them very lightweight, or for socks to resist odors], paints, various coatings, and scratch-resistant car bumpers.
Nanotechology used for health monitoring is still medical surveillance and once again the obvious question is: would it be beneficial to be chipped for health reasons?
In medical surveillance, diagnostic surveillance technologies can move from individual diagnostics towards ever broader surveillance, applied to larger and larger proportions of the population. In particular, they have a tendency to creep into forensic purposes. A number of technologies used for medical diagnosis have also been applied to forensics examinations for the finding of murder victims, crime investigations and autopsies.

DNA analysis of tissue fragments; analyses of bodily performances such as posture, gait, or facial expression, analyses of body parts, and images or imprints like fingerprints, height, weight, bodily proportions. Many of these are now being proposed for surveillance purposes in the form of extensive databases against which identities can be checked.
With an RFID chip, medical doctors do not necessarily have the need to engage with an individual who has a medical condition. They merely use language that reflects a more mechanical view of the patient. You go from being a named patient with a bad knee, to merely the knee replacement coded and signed ready for tracking and prepared in room 223.

The passage in the Obamacare proposal page 1,001, illustrates this perfectly. The Affordable Health Care Act Subtitle C-11 Sec. 2521— National Medical Device Registry reads:
“The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of post market safety and outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘is or has been used in or on a patient; ‘‘and is ‘‘a class III device; or ‘‘a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.””
There have been many attempts to downplay this section by those who don’t want to believe that this may entail an implantable device, namely, a transponder or chip, however, this is exactly what this is meant to address along with other devices that can be used to prolong and sustain life.
In fact, the very purpose of these devices are to collect data in medical patients such as “claims data, patient survey data, standardized analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of data from disparate data environments, electronic health records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the Secretary, in order to identify and observe those with genetic defects or mental problems.”
Now I am sure there are many people who believe that all of this chip nonsense doesn’t apply to them, or that they will never accept the chip because of the religious fear that you are accepting the Mark of the Beast.
However, at least 30 million people carry an RFID tag on them every day in their car keys or in their access control card to get into their office building or to buy gas or to pay a toll. New credit and debit cards will no longer be swiped, as they will be scanned by an RFID chip already embedded in the card.
The controversy and discussion about RFID technology will not end anytime soon. But both sides agree that a sizable dose of debate is needed to hammer out the kinks. Meanwhile, the technology is appearing in an increasing number of places – though even if you look around, you still might miss it.

BILL GATES OF HELL: WINDOWS 10 HIJACKING COMPUTERS

Posted by George Freund on June 2, 2016

...it's for the kids ...don't u c ? Oops  spying I don't do nooooooooooo spying ... now eats yer vity's & say yer prayers ...
Tech giant using 'unthinkable tricks' to take over machines, force controversial 'upgrade'

BOB UNRUH

Editor’s Note: Within the last week, four news editors on WND’s small editorial staff have had their computers forcibly taken over by Microsoft and left unusable for up to 90 minutes while the software giant upgraded the computer’s operating system, without user permission, to Windows 10.

Microsoft has turned “nasty” in its campaign to coerce hundreds of millions of customers to upgrade to its Windows 10 operating system, a program critics condemn as privacy-invading, data-swiping and “brimming with freemium services and ads.”

Microsoft has been trying to lure computer users into its new operating system for months, bombarding them with unending pop-up screens. But many users are comfortable with the systems they have, have no interest in learning new operations and have simply clicked the “X” to get rid of the unwanted solicitation.

You can’t do that anymore.

Microsoft changed the coding on the “X” so that clicking it now instructs MS to “upgrade” your computer to Windows 10. Yes, really.

In fact, the two options on the page, “OK” and “Upgrade Now,” do the same thing as the “X.”

To avoid the forced “upgrade,” a user has to go into the fine print.

Inside a logo box in the ad is a scheduled date for a mandatory upgrade. The user must look in the tiny type just below that line and find where it says “here” and click on that to avoid the upgrade.

“Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare is Becoming Our Reality,” marshals the terrifying evidence to show the world of Big Brother is much closer than we want to admit.

Tech world reaction has been strongly negative to what one analyst called a “deceptive” action.

But is Microsoft concerned? Not really.

Multiple requests from WND for answers to pertinent questions were met with links to company promotions for Windows 10.

Then there was Microsoft’s offer several times to go “on background” to answer questions, an offer WND declined. It apparently would have been information a reporter is supposed to hear about Windows 10, but not the general public.

What do YOU think? Sound off on Windows 10 ‘hijacking’ U.S. computers

PC World addressed the issue under the headline, “How Microsoft’s tricky new Windows 10 pop-up deceives you into upgrading.”

Senior editor Brad Chacos explained what ticked him off.

“This morning, the unthinkable happened: My wife, an avowed PC user who long ago swore to never touch an Apple device, started shopping around for a Mac Mini. And it’s all thanks to Windows 10. Or rather, the nasty new way that Microsoft’s tricking Windows 7 and 8 users into automatically updating to Windows 10.”

He said he already was no fan of Microsoft’s “strongarm” tactics, writing several months ago when Microsoft said buyers of Intel’s Skylake processors “have to upgrade to Windows 10 in the next 18 months, or forgo all but the most critical security patches – and those will be available to Windows 7 and 8.1 users only if said patches don’t ‘risk the reliability or compatibility’ on non-Skylake systems.”

Chacos called the news a “bombshell.”

“Making sure new hardware works with old operating systems no doubt consumes valuable time and resources, and hardware and software are intertwined now more than ever before, but aggressively forcing users (including businesses) to upgrade to Windows 10 before the end of the operating system’s initial stated support cycle ends is unprecedented in the Windows world,” he said.

“That nasty trick resulted in my wife’s beloved Windows 7 PC being sneakily upgraded to Windows 10 this morning. Sure, she has 30 days to roll it back to Windows 7, but she feels so betrayed – like Microsoft forcibly removed her control over her own PC – that she’s strongly considering embracing the Dark Side and buying a Mac, instead.”

Find the button that lets you decline the upgrade in this image from Microsoft:



BBC technology reporter Zoe Kleinman explained how Microsoft’s decision to force users to upgrade has “caused confusion.”

Microsoft, he says, essentially changed the “X” from “close window and begone” to “I agree to your company taking over my computer for an indefinite period and installing whatever you want and then I further agree to be subjected to a bombardment of ads as well as pilfering of my private files.”

At InfoWorld, Woody Leonhard wrote: “Microsoft has ratcheted up its Win10 upgrade efforts, going from an irritating advertising campaign to ‘reserve’ an upgrade (reserving free bits – what a marketing concept) to ‘accidentally’ forced upgrades to increasingly dicey signup notices (‘Upgrade Now/Upgrade Tonight’ to hidden folders with 3GB to 6GB of unwanted downloaded data to GWX processes that automatically restart themselves. Those are the more noticeable dirty tricks.”

He posted an explanation on how users can roll back if they’ve already been upgraded, but he warned, “the rollback can take many minutes or even hours.”

“Note that rolling back may not keep new files you’ve created, depending on where they’re stored.”

While he said he uses and likes Windows 10, “this forced updating is, in my opinion, the most customer-antagonistic act Microsoft has ever undertaken.”

Chacos left no doubt about his thoughts: “So after more than half a year of teaching people that the only way to say ‘no thanks’ to Windows 10 is to exit the GWX application – and refusing to allow users to disable the pop-up in any obvious manner, so they had to press that X over and over again during those months to the point that most people proably just click it without reading now – Microsoft just made it so that very behavior accepts the Windows 10 upgrade instead, rather than canceling it.

“That’s gross.”

He went back to his wife’s issue.

“Thanks to the deceitful new update, there’s a very high chance that my wife will be a new OS X convert by the end of the day. You may have ostensibly achieved another Windows 10 upgrade to pad your adoption stats, Microsoft, but you very well may have lost a lifelong PC user who swore she’d never switch to Apple. Which means that I may have to learn how to troubleshoot Macs.

“Dammit, Microsoft.”

Microsoft did send WND some comments it thought would be “helpful.”

“As we shared in October, Microsoft has been helping customers who received the Windows 10 upgrade as an ‘Optional’ (and now ‘Recommended’ update, to schedule their upgrade. Once a customer’s upgrade is scheduled, they will receive a notification that states the time their upgrade is scheduled for, with options to reschedule or cancel if they wish. If the customer wishes to continue with their upgrade at the designated time, they can click ‘OK’ or close (‘X’ out of the notification) with no further action needed.”

That’s from the ubiquitous “Microsoft spokesperson.”

What do YOU think? Sound off on Windows 10 ‘hijacking’ U.S. computers

Wayne Williams wrote at BetaNews, “Even if you like Windows 10, you should be angry at Microsoft.”

The “relentless pushing” from the software company is “scummy behavior, totally unbefitting of a company of Microsoft’s size and reputation.”

“The latest trick … should have people brandishing pitchforks and flaming torches and marching on Redmond, but it doesn’t. Why?Because Microsoft’s s—– g tricks are now what we expect from the company which doesn’t care in the slightest about its customers.

“Microsoft wants to get Windows 10 on a billion devices, and it’s going to hit that target even if Satya Nadella has to smash his way into your home and install it on your PC while you sleep. Sure, your computer might not work afterwards, but who cares, right? Certainly not Microsoft.”

He wrote: “Type ‘Windows 10 is’ into Google and the autocomplete suggests, among other things, the operating system is ‘bad’, ‘slow, ‘spyware’, and a ‘virus’. Bing pulls even fewer punches, saying Windows 10 is ‘rubbish’, ‘crap’, ‘awful’, ‘horrible’, and ‘slow’. Neither search engine suggests anything positive about Windows 10.

“Microsoft says once the free period expires on July 29, the Get Windows 10 (GWX) app will be removed from Windows 7 and 8.1 machines which have survived the bombardment, but will that be the end of Microsoft’s dirty campaign tricks? Somehow I doubt it.”

Want to give Microsoft a piece of your mind? Post a message on Microsoft’s Facebook page and the Windows Facebook page, call Microsoft’s headquarters at (425) 882-8080 or fax (425)706-7929.

Microsoft makes it nearly impossible to email the corporate office with user feedback, so hundreds of angry customers have flooded its Facebook page in the last 24 hours with complaints about the forced Windows 10 “upgrade,” including the following:

•Hey Microsoft nerds. Back in high school, when a girl said no to your advances, she meant no. Same goes here when users tell you no they do not want Windows 10. I know high school was tough on you, but learn from it. No means no. – Abraham Yang

•I am writing my congressional officials. This practice has got to stop. For Microsoft to take over people’s computers is an outrage! – Judy DeTuccio

•Major class-action lawsuit incoming regarding forced Window 10 upgrades. Will be in the billions. – Jake Rappoport

•SLAMMED BY MICROSOFT! I have patiently declined the offer to “upgrade” to Windows 10 each day for several months. This morning Microsoft slammed all of the machines in my office with out my permission. The process took more than 2 hours out of our work day to reverse, which equates to several thousand dollars of lost productivity. This is an unacceptable business practice by a company I had come to trust and respect. When telephone companies employed similar practices, they were sued and criminally prosecuted! Restitution should be made to me and other impacted businesses who have suffered from this insane action on the part of Microsoft! Shame on you, Microsoft!!!! – Rick Biers

•NO, NO, NO Microsoft!!! We don’t want automatic upgrades to Windows 10, and you have NO RIGHT to alter software we have paid for, on machines we own!!!! – Al Freeman

•This whole Windows 10 update thing is really shady. Shame on you, Microsoft. My next OS will be Linux. – Derek Davis

•Could you please let me know where to send my repair bill to fix my computer after Microsoft 10 was downloaded without my permission? I paid $99 to fix everything, and that’s not counting being down for an entire day of work due to not having a computer. I specifically chose the option to decline the upgrade after it kept popping up on my screen every single day, but you downloaded it anyway while I was sleeping. Please respond. I’d be happy to provide the actual repair bill. Thank so much. – Suzette Salcido

•WTH, Microsoft, with the auto upgrade to Windows 10. I had to wipe my computer and reinstall W7 once already. Don’t force your spyware on me! – Renee Kowal

•Thanks for forcing something on my business that I did not want, thereby forcing me to spend more money to either fix or conform. You’ll be getting my bill, and I’ll expect payment within 15 days of receipt. – Brian Oswald Dc

•How dare you sneak attack my computer in the middle of the night! If I had wanted Windows 10, I would have downloaded it myself! My computer is MINE, not yours. Hands off! – Brenda Riely

•You idiots just made me go to Apple! Stop messing with my PC, Microsoft! I DON’T want windows 10 so [stop] hijacking my PC to install it behind my back! – Alice In-Flames

“Police State USA: How Orwell’s Nightmare is Becoming Our Reality,” marshals the terrifying evidence to show the world of Big Brother is much closer than we want to admit.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/bill-gates-of-hell-windows-10-hijacks-computers/#SIuOmwtAda0Hu6tD.99

THOSE BANKSTER HACKS: A STRANGE STORY ABOUT HACKING THE FED

Posted on June 6, 2016 by Joseph P. Farrell • http://gizadeathstar.com/2016/06/bankster-hacks-strange-story-hacking-fed/

This very important story was shared by Ms. KM, and it's so signifiant I simply have to blog about it, especially given the previous weeks' stories about various banks being hacked. Only this one is far more serious:
"Anonymous" Hacks Federal Reserve; Grabs Stock Ownership files!
Now the title here says it all: the hacking group Anonymous has allegedly hacked not only the FEderal Reserve, but stolen files indicating which corporations the US Fed has purchased:

The hacker group known as "Anonymous" has announced it successfully penetrated multiple systems within the federal reserve bank, and successfully downloaded two crucial files: One showing an account number and the stocks owned by that account number, the other showing an account number and the name of the owner of that account. Without having BOTH files, no one could ever tell who owned what.  Anonymous claims they stole BOTH files!
Anonymous says the federal reserve bank owns more than fifty percent of the stock in quite a few major US Corporations!  If the fed had not purchased these vast quantities of stocks (Think Dow Jones Industrials (DJIA) and the S&P 500) both markets would have crashed long ago!
Even worse, the group claims that the US federal reserve also purchased stocks in foreign companies and foreign banks in such vast quantities as to prop-up European and Asian markets!!!!

Now there's an implication here that is also equally disturbing. Since the Federal Reserve is a privately owned stock corporation, the actual owners of its stock are also not well known, though it has been more or less an accepted theory in the alternative research community that the major banking families have been the major owners ot the Fed's own stock since its founding, but there's never been a real historical history of who owned how much, nor how these blocks of stock might have changed over time. The usual suspects are, of course, the Morgan interests, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Warburgs, Schiffs, and so on. But what was true in 1913 may not be true now.
If this story is true, the possibility thus arises that Anonymous may have found these files as well, and knows exactly who owns how much, and has been profiting from the Fed's activities. Consider that implication in the light of the 2008 bailout hearings, where the banksters informed Congress that they wanted billions in bailouts, and could tolerate no Congressional oversight on where all that money went.
So what;s the high octane speculation here? Well, for one thing, consider that if this story is true, it would give Anonymous enormous "blakmail" power, and the threat of exposure of some of this information could be an indicator of some behind-the-scenes blackmail. But for our purposes, the more important question is who, or what, is behind Anonymous? Many have speculated that the group may be a front group for Russia or China, since it seems to choose its targets carefully, and these have been almost completely directed at some of the pillars of the "deep state" and financial system of the West and of the USA. In the context of the ongoing economic warfare taking place between the West and the two principal BRICSA nations, the thesis has some merit. There is also the possibility that Anonymous represents a kind of cyber-warfare operational front for what I have been calling the international Fascist Mafia, that it is truly what it says it is, an international and extraterritorial group. If so, possession of such files alone sends a message, namely, that te group knows exactly who is who in the financial pecking orderand that the list they hold shows exactly where, and how, all that bailout money was used, and ultimately, who may really be determining the policies of the fed.
But any way one slices it, if the story is true, there's probably a lot of anxious banksters and family banking dynasty patriarchs not sleeping too soundly these days.