Something Big Has Surfaced! Obama Makes His Move Before Exiting! Truth You Don't Want to Know But Have To!

Posted by George Freund on January 9, 2016  somebody's got 2 say It ! shut the fuck up ,you fraud,phony ..ass pipe ,sock puppet No~dumb~bell  "peace prize" sack of shit          (obama)     don't worry um NOT 'inhaling'    (me)  ... oh ah um uhhh um.. i am sorry mr. prez  .... wait ,wait?  fucker your inhaling  :O   ass pipe “I don’t believe people should to be able to own guns.” – Barack Obama

you GO head & give up yer BOOMSTICK, um thing um gonna keep MINE !  ass prez.. umpretty sher i KNOW what you & yer  ilk would do ...Huh 

Tuesday, January 5, 2016 17:38

By Lisa Haven

American citizens are soon to become endangered species under the current tyrannical regime that is now in charge of our country. Secretly and behind closed doors the United Nations is gearing up for gun confiscation in the event of an economic collapse in numerous countries by hiring “disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration” officers who will be trained to seize guns from the civilian population. Not only that but laws are being shoved through that specifically restrict certain firearms, armor, ammo and the like. The Obama administration has made it clear that their agenda is to disarm American patriots. Just like Hitlter, Stalin, Pot, and Mao, Obama is taking a play straight out of their playbook, and we are headed for disaster:

“The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty.”– Adolf Hitler

“To conquer a nation, first disarm its citizens.” ― Adolf Hitler

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.”– Mao Tse Tung

In the video below I delve through the real facts about gun laws and statistics and how Obama just initiated his plan to ignite new executive actions against our gun rights. I include staggering documents presented from whitehouse.gove and more!! Trust me this is one video you need to be aware of…

“If I could have banned them all – ‘Mr. and Mrs. America turn in your guns’ – I would have!” – Diane Feinstein

“We’re bending the law as far as we can to ban an entirely new class of guns.” – Rahm Emmanuel, senior advisor to Bill Clinton

“If the personal freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution inhibit the government’s ability to govern the people, we should look to limit those guarantees.” – President Bill Clinton, August 12, 1993

“We know that other countries, in response to one mass shooting, have been able to craft laws that almost eliminate mass shootings.  Friends of ours, allies of ours — Great Britain, Australia, countries like ours.  So we know there are ways to prevent it”.  President Obama

“I don’t believe people should to be able to own guns.” – Barack Obama

So What Exactly Does History Show About Gun Confiscation??

1. In 1911 in Turkey guns were restricted and a result one and a half million Armenians were unable to defend themselves and were ethnically cleaned by the government.

2. In 1929 the former Soviet Union established gun control and as a result Stalins government killed 40 million Soviets.

3. Hitler in Nazi Germany established his version of Gun control in 1938 where millions of Jews, gypsies, homosexuals, mentally ill, disabled, and eventually some of the “brown shirts” who worked for the government were killed.

4. In 1935 Communist China established gun control and 50 million political dissidents were arrested and killed.

5. In 1964 to 1981 Guatemala established gun control and 100,00 were killed.

6. In 1970 Uganda established gun control and from 1970-1979 300,000 Christians were killed by the dictatorial government.

7. In 1975-1977 Cambodia gun restriction laws prevented people from defending themselves against the tyrannical government who arrested and killed one million people.

8. In 1994 Rwanda disarmed the Tutsi people and being unable to defend themselves one million were executed.

Therefore 70 million people died due to gun control!! 

 

For More Information See: 

Document- https://s3.amazonaws.com/public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2015-33181.pdf

Obama Fact Sheet- https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/04/fact-sheet-new-executive-actions-reduce-gun-violence-and-make-our

Obama Video and info- https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/01/04/live-updates-what-president-doing-keep-guns-out-wrong-hands

Real Statistics- https://www.gunowners.org/sk0802htm.htm 

Infowars- http://www.infowars.com/obama-executive-order-may-require-those-selling-even-a-single-firearm-to-become-licensed-dealers/

Politico- http://www.politico.com/story/2016/01/obama-gun-control-rule-mental-illness-217340#.xooxulh:60XJ

http://beforeitsnews.com/police-state/2016/01/something-big-has-surfaced-obama-makes-his-move-before-exiting-truth-you-dont-want-to-know-but-have-to-2716.html

America was never meant to be ruled by executive fiat. The slippery slope hardly describes it. There is a secret agenda. Genocide can and always has been the reason. When the global economy implodes the useless eaters will be culled from the heard that has historically included the useful idiots to brought such schemes to fruition. 

Terrorism in 2015: Following a False Flag Formula

Posted on January 4, 2016 by Kevin Ryan   http://digwithin.net/

In 2015, there were 385 terrorist incidents around the world according to Wikipedia. Of these, 94% were attributed to Muslim perpetrators or occurred in Muslim countries surrounding the world’s most resource-rich region. The geographic pattern behind these and previous attacks suggests that terrorism is more a function of the need to seize resources than it is about religious or political beliefs. The terrorist events of 2015 continue to fuel speculation that most terrorism is government-sponsored and focuses on achieving political objectives.
Most of the terrorist attacks in 2015 were attributed to groups located in the relatively small region of southwestern Eurasia that has been the focus of competition for resources among the world’s superpowers. The political will to drive seizure of those resources requires Western governments to generate a fear of terrorism in their own societies so that “responses” can happen without interference from the public. Maintaining the fear is what appears to be the primary objective behind the fewer, better publicized, attacks in Western countries.
Since 9/11, terrorist acts in Western countries have exhibited a formulaic set of common features that suggest the government might have been involved in the crimes. Here are ten such features.

1. Evidence against the accused is usually composed of hearsay claims or dubious documents that originate with military or law enforcement sources.
2. The hearsay evidence typically includes vague accusations that the suspects were in contact with, had “links” to, or made recent pledges of allegiance to, terrorist leaders.
3. The documentary evidence includes things like passports conveniently left at the scene or social media postings that imply a commitment to terrorism.
4. There is an overly obvious attempt to associate the terrorists with Islam.
5. The suspects are usually dead by the time the first reports come out.
6. People who knew the accused often say they had absolutely no idea that their friend/neighbor/family member was involved or interested in terrorism in any way.
7. The testimony of eyewitnesses is ignored as authorities provide contradictory stories that quickly become the official, media-driven accounts.
8. Eyewitnesses often describe the attackers as armed and outfitted like highly trained, and well-supported, special operations soldiers.
9. The attacks usually coincide with military or law enforcement exercises that mimic what happens.
10. The incidents are used to justify rapid military attacks against countries of strategic interest before any investigation is conducted.

In 2015, two acts of terrorism in the U.S. were attributed to white men who survived and were not said to be associated with Muslims. These were the June shooting of nine African Americans in a South Carolina church and the November killing of three people at a Planned Parenthood facility in Colorado. But the remaining six terrorist events in the West were all attributed to Muslims. Here are quick summaries of how those terrorist events exhibited the features listed above.
Paris in January—The Charlie Hebdo and Kosher Grocery attacks: The first of two major terrorist acts in Paris resulted in a considerable number of as-yet unanswered questions. Not the least of these was that the military-style attackers wore balaclavas to conceal their identities yet left a passport for quick identification. The attackers took pains to associate themselves with Islam yet also displayed professional training like that of special operations soldiers.
Copenhagen in February—Two people were shot dead in separate shootings that were allegedly motivated by art that was disrespectful to Muslims. Police said that Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein committed both crimes and that he died during the second attack. El-Hussein was reported to be well known to Danish intelligence and had been in and out of prison. Despite being sentenced to two years in December 2014 for “serious violence,” he was released in January 2015 and was allegedly engaged in the shootings just two weeks later. Danish citizens have raised questions about the possibility of this being a false-flag attack.
Texas in May—At an anti-Islamic art exhibit featuring images of the Prophet Mohammed in Garland, Texas, two heavily armed gunmen wearing body armor began shooting. One school security officer was shot in the ankle before both of the alleged attackers were killed. The two men had police records and one was the subject of an FBI investigation.
Australia in October—In Parramatta, a 15-year old boy was said to shoot a police employee after visiting a mosque and listening to a lecture by an extremist Islamist leader (according to police). Although Australian authorities called it an act of political terrorism, like most 15-year olds the boy was not politically active and the lecture he attended was about “charity and how to worship God and help others.” His family and friends had no idea that he had any violent tendencies.
Paris in November—In a coordinated series of attacks, terrorists killed 130 people. Just two days later, before an investigation was completed, France began a new bombing campaign in Syria. Only one of the ten suspects, Saleh Abdeslam, survived the attacks. He was first questioned and released by French authorities, even when it was known that he had rented a car used in the crimes. It was reported that Belgian authorities later let him escape. In November it was revealed that Paris police were engaged in a mass shooting exercise the very morning of the attacks.
California in December—The San Bernardino Shootings: The only eyewitness to the shootings said the perpetrators were three tall, athletic, white men in combat-style gear. The witnesses to the getaway said they saw three men in black masks fleeing the scene with rifles in hand. Another said it was three white men in military gear. The attackers got into a black SUV with tinted windows and “calmly” left the scene. Despite these eyewitness reports, the official account quickly became that two small, brown-skinned Muslim people committed the crimes. A few days later, President Obama promoted the new myth without proper investigation or trial and took pains to remind the nation that, “Al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11.”
Citizens later learned that there are glaring questions that remain unanswered about the San Bernardino shootings but the media frenzy in support of the government account had already become an entrenched myth. Even as the New York Times retracted reporting on the subject and the Washington Post admitted that American law enforcement officials were “famous for feeding contradictory and unfounded information to the media,” the myth continued to go unchallenged.
Despite the fact that government-sponsored false flag terrorism has been well documented as a fact throughout modern history, terrorism remains a powerful tool for controlling public opinion. The events of 2015 have shown that the propaganda tools for presenting terrorism are being continually refined. The formula used by government and media to report new accounts of terrorism may one day become so well tuned that it will be effective in presenting anyone as a terrorist with little or no actual evidence. It would therefore be wise for all citizens to question all acts of terrorism in order to prevent greater abuses of power.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged False Flag, Paris Attacks,

IS PENN STATE PEDOPHILIA TIED TO THE FRANKLIN COVERUP?

Aug14 by Jon Rappoport

IS PENN STATE PEDOPHILIA TIED TO FRANKLIN COVERUP?
By Jon Rappoport
August 13, 2012
www.nomorefakenews.com
Graham Spanier, former Penn State president who, according to the Freeh report, helped cover up Jerry Sandusky’s pedophile crimes, turns up with a federal-government job so secret no one can talk about it.
Spanier’s lawyer, Peter Vaira, tells the Washington Post he doesn’t know what the job is or which agency Spanier is working for. The job involves part-time consulting on national security issues.
Spanier claims he obtained a security clearance from the feds during his tenure as Penn State president, and after he was fired, federal investigators checked him out and decided to maintain that clearance.
In other words, because Spanier kept his mouth shut about Sandusky’s crimes against children, this proved he was no snitch and the government could trust him to keep its secrets, too?
The NY Times has reported on a 2002 incident involving Spanier. A Phoenix private investigator, Paul McLaughlin, claims he spoke with Spanier on the phone. McLaughlin offered to send Spanier a tape of a conversation in which a Penn State professor, John Naisworth, admitted he molested McLaughlin when he was a young boy. According to McLaughlin, Spanier refused the tape.
A case against Professor Naisworth was eventually thrown out. The judge wouldn’t allow the tape to be entered as evidence.
What federal agency is Spanier now working for? What national-security issues is he privy to? Is there an agency we’ve never heard of, whose job is to protect high-level pedophiles from investigation and prosecution?
Spanier denies he ever knew about Sandusky molesting children. He states he never would have let something so heinous slip by. He may have a chance to prove that in court. Charges could be filed against him.

---

Victor Thorn, writing at the American Free Press, paints explosive background on Spanier’s tenure as chancellor at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) and Spanier’s possible connection to the infamous Franklin Coverup, a pedophile operation that reached into the highest levels of the US government.
“…one of Spanier’s personal associates at UNL was a man named Ronald Roskens [a past UNL Chancellor and President]. Roskens has been intimately linked to the notorious Franklin Scandal, and then received his termination notice after being photographed with young naked boys at his residence.
“Gary Caradori, a private investigator that delved into Franklin, wrote of the circumstances surrounding Roskens’s firing. ‘I was informed that Roskens was terminated by the state because of sexual activities reported to the Regents and verified by them. Mr. Roskens was reported to have had young men at his residence for sexual encounters. As part of the separation from the state, he had to move out of the state-owned house because of the liability to the state if some of his sexual behavior was illegal.’
“On July 11, 1990, after obtaining pornographic-pedophile photographs that would have irreversibly exposed Franklin, Caradori was murdered when his Piper aircraft exploded in mid-air, killing him and his eight-year-old son.
“It goes without saying that the similarities between these acts of pedophilia in Nebraska show a close resemblance to the alleged Sandusky pedophilia scandal that Spanier helped cover-up at PSU. In this light, a question must be asked: Was Spanier brought to PSU because of his close ties to a far-reaching pedophile network in Nebraska? Was he the hands-on university president that oversaw what many in-the-know at PSU realized was a powder keg that could explode at any moment (and eventually did)?”
http://americanfreepress.net/?p=5131

---

Meanwhile, Radar Online is reporting that a witness just told the FBI he saw Jerry Sandusky and a Penn State donor abuse two boys on a private plane. This witness states he has business connections with the donor.
Before this is over, we should, at the very least, learn yet again how a powerful institution (e.g., Penn State) covers up its knowledge of crimes and enables those crimes, in the service of maintaining a front of respectability and dignity. But if the investigation stops there, we’ll know less than we should about far-flung global pedophile networks:

http://www.infowars.com/new-york-prostitution-ring-provided-minors-for-wealthy-elitists/

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12762333

http://www.theage.com.au/world/australian-police-unearth-global-pedophile-ring-20101231-19bnt.html