---BREAKAWAY CIVILIZATION ---ALTERNATIVE HISTORY---NEW BUSINESS MODELS--- ROCK & ROLL 'S STRANGE BEGINNINGS---SERIAL KILLERS---YEA AND THAT BAD WORD "CONSPIRACY"--- AMERICANS DON'T EXPLORE ANYTHING ANYMORE.WE JUST CONSUME AND DIE.---
Highly controversial techniques would allow human embryos to be constructed from the DNA of 3 different people
In what will likely only lead to the inevitable, designer babies are set to become a norm on planet earth in the near future.
Image a world in which you can design your very own baby. One where you can pick your
artificially planned newborn’s DNA from at least 3 different gene
pools. A real life customized test tube baby. Possibly one which will
resist certain inherent genetic flaws such as hereditary disorders, health problems and more. 1) Well that’s just exactly what some scientists and British regulators are now pushing for by the year’s end.
In fact, Britain’s fertility regulator recently released a report which basically states that advanced scientific techniques to create a hybrid human embryo from the DNA of 3 people is not “unsafe”, thus opening the door to the genetic-modification of the human species.
The Associated Press reported on the matter, giving some insight into the scientists thought process: 2)
“Until a healthy baby is born, we cannot say 100 percent that
these techniques are safe,” said Dr. Andy Greenfield, who chaired the
expert panel behind the report. The techniques are meant to stop mothers from passing on
potentially fatal genetic diseases to their babies and involve altering a
human egg or embryo before transferring it into a woman. Such methods
have only been allowed for research in a laboratory, but the U.K.
department of health has said it hopes new legislation will be in place by the end of the year that allows treatment of patients.
Not only is this information hard to chew on, but shockingly Britain
may become the first country in the world to allow the controversial procedure.
However, thus far nothing has really stopped scientists from doing
anything. In fact, some are roaming mad men who play with deadly viruses
on a daily basis. 3)
Over 150 human animal hybrids already made
According to the Daily Mail, at least 150 human animal hybrids have been made in U.K. labs.
An excerpt from the article reads: 4) Figures seen by the Daily Mail show that 155 ‘admixed’
embryos, containing both human and animal genetic material, have been
created since the introduction of the 2008 Human Fertilisation
Embryology Act. This legalized the creation of a variety of hybrids, including an
animal egg fertilised by a human sperm; ‘cybrids’, in which a human
nucleus is implanted into an animal cell; and ‘chimeras’, in which human
cells are mixed with animal embryos. Scientists say the techniques can be used to develop embryonic stem cells which can be used to treat a range of incurable illnesses. Three labs in the UK – at King’s College
London, Newcastle University and Warwick University – were granted
licences to carry out the research after the Act came into force.
Ladies and gentlemen, people are now playing as if they are God.
International Men Of Mystery: How Discredited
German 'Anti-Piracy' Company May Secretly Be Behind Malibu Media's
Copyright Trollery
from the well,-look-at-that dept
Things have been getting more interesting on the Malibu Media front lately. The company, which is responsible for 40% of all copyright cases, has certainly faced claims of abusive and seriously questionable practices. But some new information suggests it goes much further down the rabbit hole of questionableness. Like Righthaven and Prenda before it, new accusations are coming out about some highly questionable shell games to try to hide what's really going on.
In this case, it's come out that behind all of Malibu Media's shady
tactics, the folks actually pulling the strings (or, at least, heavily
involved) may be the German company Guardaley, or one of its many sneaky
shell companies. If you've been following copyright trolls for a while,
you may recognize Guardaley as the shady company involved (secretly) in
some of the original copyright trollery in the US, which was slammed in court for highly
questionable technology that was at the center of its attempts to
"identify" people to go after in the shakedown scam known as copyright
trolling.
Guardaley had been laying low for a while, but back in April, Sophisticated Jane Doe over at FightCopyrightTrolls turned up Guardaley's secret playbook,
which was clearly not meant for public consumption. It is... quite a
read. It highlights the various shell games and individuals involved --
and also notes how Guardaley can quickly churn out cookie cutter legal
filings against the various individuals it "sues" (with the entire
effort actually focused on getting people to pay them to go away). And,
astoundingly, it basically admits that Guardaley will supply bogus
"experts" to support the claims in court. From page 35 of the
presentation:
Okay, now jump back to January, in which one of the lawyers representing
Malibu Media admitted that the "expert" company it uses, IPP (a
Guardaley shell) worked "pursuant to an oral contingency fee."
In other words, it was getting a cut of any money secured via these
lawsuits and corresponding shakedowns. That's kind of a big deal: when
your "expert witness" has a direct financial stake in the outcome, that
means your expert witness is doing something very, very shady. No wonder
Guardaley doesn't want the judges to question them too much.
For the past few months there had been some ongoing efforts to get
various Malibu Media lawyers to reveal the details of their relationship
with Guardaley/IPP and other related shells. Not surprisingly, Malibu
Media lawyers are trying to block all of that. This finally resulted in
an impressive filing from copyright troll fighter, lawyer Morgan Pietz,
who accuses the company of champerty
-- a scheme to "buy into" lawsuits, something that is at the very least
frowned upon, but more frequently against the law. Furthermore, Pietz
notes that Malibu Media should have been proactively disclosing
Guardaley's interest in the cases, but has not -- instead highlighting
how the company (actually, its lawyers) has been "fighting tooth and
nail all attempts by defendants to inquire about these arrangements." He
even calls Guardaley "the German computer guys."
Separately, the filing dismantles Malibu's bizarre attempt to avoid this whole issue by blaming it on some other guy in Florida.
Malibu concedes that it did [disclose this information] here, and counsel
on the pleadings here in Maryland concludes that there could not possibly be any kind of breach of this
duty because lead national counsel in Miami, not counsel here, negotiated the improper witness
contingency agreement. Regardless of what local counsel here did or did not know, lead counsel in
Miami, whose firm presumably authored the early discovery papers in the first instance, and who
participated in the consolidated proceedings in this district before Judges Titus and Grimm, had a duty to
make sure this fact was disclosed to the Courts here and across the country.
The filing then goes into significant detail about the whole mess, under the wonderful title:
International Men Of Mystery: Tobias Fieser, Michael Patzer, Daniel Macek, Patrick Achache, Guardaley & The
Shell Companies, And The Software With A Name Nobody Seems To Know
The "software with a name nobody seems to know" involves constantly
changing claims about what software is being used to identify people
accused of infringement, along with the claims that this unnamed and
ever-changing software is somehow infallible (despite Guardaley's tech
being so discredited previously). In an amusing section, Pietz points
out how quite clearly "fallible" the technology is:
In the letter Malibu submitted to Judge Titus and Judge Grim last year, they argued that IPP’s
proprietary software was literally “infallible.” ... In the opposition to the instant motion,
Malibu submits a declaration from Michael Patzer where he avers that “the PCAPs recorded the IP
address 76.100.228 [sic] infringing Plaintiff’s copyrights.” That is incorrect. Mr. Patzer left out three
digits in that IP address. This simply goes to show that no matter how “infallible” Malibu and Patzer
think the software and corresponding proprietary system they designed may be, there is always room for
human error, at either the input stage, or the output stage.
The filing highlights the similarities of these shell companies with the
recent ruling against Prenda, and highlights increasing evidence of how
the people above are really deeply involved in a bunch of shell games.
It calls out evidence in a non-Malibu Media case, Elf-Man LLC v.
Lamberson, which lays out more evidence
of an incredible circle of shell companies. I won't repost it here, but
it's worth reading, just to see some of the crazy chain of shell
companies. This is not the whole chain of crazy, but just a snippet:
As the defendant’s own investigation revealed in Elf-Man, Crystal Bay
Corporation, the
company Macek (and Patzer?) supposedly “worked for” ... was a
defunct South Dakota corporation, apparently incorporated in 2012 by a
disbarred lawyer who,
according to his website, “now specializes in creating ‘anonymous’
‘shelf’ corporations.” .... The official address Crystal Bay Corporation
registered with the South Dakota
Secretary of State? It belongs to a mail forwarding company, and it is
the same address given for the
disbarred lawyer’s “Agent Services” company.... Same thing with the
Stuttgart, Germany
address given for Patzer and Macek: it corresponds to an office building
in Stuttgart “that offers mail
drop services and short term office rents, even by the hour.” ... The
Elf-Man defendant also
investigated the phone numbers given for Patzer and Macek. The regional
code for Macek’s number
corresponded to Karlsruhe, Germany. The regional code for Patzer was for
a suburb of Karlsruhe....
The coup de grace from Elf-Man: when defense counsel there recently called the (Karlsruhe)
phone number given for Macek in the initial disclosures in that case, the person on the other end of the
line answered it “Guardaley.”
Boom. Also, there's the part in which one of the guys admits he works
for one of these shell companies and then has to be lead by Malibu
Media's lawyer into saying he didn't actually work for the company:
More importantly, the testimony Malibu complains Pietz omitted only further supports the
argument that Guardaley = IPP = Excipio, and that Patzer, Fieser, and Macek are all part of the same
organization. For starters, at the beginning of Patzer’s testimony, he first says “yes” when asked if he
works at IPP Limited.... Malibu’s counsel then asks him a leading question,
reminding him that “you don’t actually work for IPP, Limited. You said you work for a firm that
provides these services to IPP, Limted, correct?” and Patzer confirms that.... However, throughout
Patzer’s testimony, he constantly refers to “we” when it is clear he is referring to IPP. None of that
suggests that Excipio is really a totally different company that should be credited as possibly more
trustworthy than Guardaley; it suggests Patzer thinks of himself as working with Fieser at IPP.
And, of course, days after this was filed, the lawyer who had been
representing the copyright holders in Elf-Man, Maureen VanderMay,
suddenly filed a motion to withdraw
as counsel, noting that "issues have arisen between Plaintiff's
representative and counsel, the nature of which make it impossible for
counsel to both continue with representation and comply with the
governing rules of professional conduct." However, she refuses to detail
those reasons, citing their "privileged and confidential nature,"
though says that if required to, she would like to do so under seal.
It's not too difficult to put two and two together here, suggesting the
likely issue is that VanderMay realized how much trouble everyone
involved in this scheme may be in soon. And, anyone who witnessed both
the Righthaven and Prenda debacles knows that random outside lawyers who
help out are the first ones often thrown under the bus in these
disputes.
Call them "RIAA-lite."
Six years after the US recording industry stopped seeking money from
file-sharers, a new company is now preparing technology that could flood
the Internet with "hundreds of millions of notices" to alleged
copyright infringers.
Rightscorp, the company behind the campaign, already sends out
thousands of notices to users, while making big promises to
investors—and not-so-subtle threats to Internet Service Providers. The
company's whole strategy is based on telling ISPs that they're likely to
face a high-stakes copyright lawsuit if they don't forward the notices
that Rightscorp creates.
It works like this: users accused by Rightscorp are found via IP
addresses appearing in BitTorrent download swarms. If ISPs agree to
forward Rightscorp's notices—and an increasing number of them are doing
so—the users get notices that they could be liable for $150,000 in
damages. Unless, that is, they click on a provided link and agree to
settle their case at a low, low price. Typically, it's $20 per song
infringed.
In
an interview with Ars, Rightscorp COO Robert Steele said that asking
for $20 per infringement is a "socially fair way to create a
deterrent." The company hopes to make the cost of infringement more akin
to a standard traffic ticket than a DUI, while still keeping the threat
of massive statutory damages—up to $150,000 for one willful copyright
infringement—in its back pocket.
"Entertainers don't want to do that very often," said Steele.
"They want to make people happy. For most people, a $10,000 judgment is a
really tough thing. We're giving an opportunity for people to resolve
the matter and recoup some loss to the creative, for a relatively small
amount of money."
To make itself the Internet's premier copyright traffic cop,
Rightscorp needs the help of Internet service providers. Steele and
other Rightscorp executives insist that ISPs will help them, not because
they want to, but because they have to. The company believes ISPs
are obligated to forward their notices under the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (DMCA) if they want the "safe harbor" against lawsuits
offered by that law (though this is an interpretation not everyone
agrees with).
Rightscorp is a small company, with just seven full-time employees, but it's growing fast. The company went public in October, and it reported its annual financial results
a few months ago. It had revenue of $324,016 during 2013, up from less
than $100,000 in 2012. Rightscorp is on pace to blow that record away
again, having collected more than $188,000 in just the first quarter.
Since Rightscorp splits its settlement cash 50/50 with its clients,
those numbers mean that Internet users paid up almost $750,000 last year
over its notices. The company's two anchor clients are large music
labels: BMG Rights Management and Warner Brothers accounted for 25
percent and seven percent of Rightscorp revenue, respectively.
Even with those marquee colleagues, it remains to be seen whether
Rightscorp will be a business success. At this point, it's still way in
the red, with its growing revenue outweighed by $2.1 million in expenses
last year.
Looking
at the big picture, attempts to enforce Internet copyrights on a wide
scale haven't generally been profitable. (Remember Righthaven?) The one
big exception has been "porn trolling," and critics say the quick
payouts in that field are driven largely by consumers who are too
embarrassed to fight back. Rightscorp has ruled out that line of work,
promising it won't go into the business of enforcing copyrights on adult
material.
"We're holding big American corporations accountable for something
they are participating in that hurts people," said Steele. "We need the
moral high ground."
In any case, many Internet users who don't know the name of
Rightscorp may be learning it soon. The company has settled with 72,000
users who they say broke copyright laws, and it sent notices to hundreds
of thousands, if not millions, of others. On a recent call with
investors, Rightscorp CEO Christopher Sabec said the company is working
with more than 70 ISPs, including five in the top 10. (Rightscorp won't
disclose which ones.)
Only a few of the Rightscorp notices have been published. Last summer, a Charter subscriber posted
one of 14 notices he received on reddit. The notice accuses the user of
downloading a track from Daft Punk's newly released album, and it read
in part:
Your ISP has forwarded you this notice.
This is not spam. Your ISP account has been used to download, upload,
or offer for upload copyrighted content in a manner that infringes on
the rights of the copyright owner.
Your ISP service could be suspended if this matter is not
resolved. You could be liable for up to $150,000 per infringement in
civil penalties.
In the same thread, another user said that Comcast forwards
Rightscorp notices but removes the settlement details and links. If it's
true that some big ISPs strip Rightscorp's notices down to their bare
bones and then forward, Rightscorp may be overstating its case when it tells investors that five of the 10 largest ISPs "participate with us and our clients."
CSI: Repeat Infringers
Sabec and Steele co-founded the company in 2011. Sabec is an attorney
with roots in the music industry. He worked with Dave Matthews and
Hansen, and he later licensed intellectual property for the Jerry Garcia
Estate.
Steele, meanwhile, is the tech guy. During the first dot-com boom, he
made software to put AOL's Mapquest and Microsoft Powerpoint on early
handheld devices. At Rightscorp, he's taken that knowledge and used it
to build a system that searches file-sharing networks that use
BitTorrent software.
"Just like Google has a crawler, we have a crawler," Steele
explained. "It crawls the entire world, all the file-sharing networks.
It finds all of the different seeders that are giving away our clients'
products for free, all day long."
The 'seeders' that Rightscorp is looking for are IP addresses
uploading pieces of files through BitTorrent. It's not complicated to
find those IP addresses, but only an ISP has the records that connect
those addresses to actual Internet users.
IP addresses change over time, and that's where Rightscorp's "secret
sauce" kicks in. Steele said his company has a proprietary method of
identifying particular users, without ISP cooperation, even when IP
addresses get rotated over time.
That, Steele said, allows them to finger "repeat infringers" with
certainty. Faced with such evidence, the ISPs are legally obligated to
take action, up to and including cutting off Internet access. Under the
DMCA, that's what those companies must do if they want to keep their
"safe harbor" from copyright lawsuits.
"We're showing the ISPs that they have this potential liability,"
said Steele. "Their shield for liability is contingent on terminating
repeat infringers. Prior to our company, there was no way to hold them
accountable."
Rightscorp creates notices for every infringement and sends the
notices to every ISP. Some ISPs don't do Rightscorp's bidding, but an
increasing number do agree to forward the notices. (It also isn't clear
how many may alter the notices or offer a lower level of compliance than
Rightscorp would like.)
Steele wouldn't go into details about the technical aspects of how
Rightscorp is able to track users even as their IP addresses change. But
he did say that when he let ISPs know that Rightscorp had such an
ability, they didn't believe him. "I said, oh, well, just look them up,"
he said. "They know who they've assigned the IP addresses to every
time. Once we showed them we could pierce that veil, they saw that's
potentially opening them up to this liability.
"It's a bit like watching CSI," he said. "When someone has been shot,
they want to connect a gun to a slug. They fire a new bullet and say,
'Judge, there's a 99 percent chance this bullet out of the gun matches
the bullet in the victim.' We can show a 99 percent chance of the same
subscriber account [over two IP addresses]."
Rightscorp puts the data about what repeat infringers are up to in a
Web-based "dashboard," where it can be looked at by both Rightscorp's
copyright owner clients as well as ISPs.
The dashboard is a "groundbreaking" technology, he says. Rightscorp
has filed five patents around its system for locating and tracking
repeat infringers.
The system puts Rightscorp ahead of other companies using threats or
lawsuits to do large-scale copyright enforcement, Steele said. The
ability to identify with certainty repeat infringers makes
Rightscorp "the only company to have legal leverage with ISPs,
compelling the ISP to deliver settlement notices by leveraging the
DMCA," according to the company.
The most relevant courtroom battle is from 2003: the RIAA v. Verizon
case that went up to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. In it, record
companies sought to compel Verizon to reveal the identity of a
subscriber allegedly using the now defunct KaZaA file-sharing software.
The record companies won initially, but the appeals court sided with
Verizon, finding that the DMCA didn't require it to comply with the
RIAA's subpoena.
While that case certainly doesn't suggest a lawsuit would be an easy
win for a copyright owner, it also doesn't rule out the possibility. If a
court bought into Rightscorp's argument that its body of evidence was
uniquely convincing, it could hold an unresponsive ISP liable. If a
court was convinced that a service provider was unresponsive in the face
of clear evidence of infringement, it could be held liable.
"If there are a bunch of notices about someone being an infringer,
that could be enough to trigger the obligation to do something about
their account," said Band. "If [copyright owners] say, 'We sent you
three notices that this guy was a bad guy, and you didn't do anything,'
then they could argue that whatever policy you had wasn't a good
policy." RIAA v. Verizon is more than a decade old now, and it's
telling that there aren't more examples of copyright holders pushing
courts to detail ISP obligations in terms of protecting copyrights. In a
way, the "six strikes" system that's now going into effect is a
compromise, born of the fact that neither side has an incentive to push
this issue to a final decision. There's no crystal clear answer.
Future ambitions
That murky legal landscape hasn't stopped both ISPs and content
industries from thriving. Yet it's also made room for one attempt after
another at leveraging copyright law into for-profit Internet policing
schemes. Rightscorp is merely the latest incarnation.
In the future, the company hopes to get more ISPs to comply—and it
will expect more of those that are already cooperating, said
Steele. Ultimately, Rightscorp is hoping for a scenario in which the
repeat infringers it identifies aren't just notified by e-mail. Instead,
Steele hopes to see those users re-directed to a Rightscorp notice
right at the moment they open their Web browsers.
"You wouldn't be able to get around the re-direct page, and you'd
have to pay a fine to return to browsing," he explained. The company
is in discussions with four ISPs about imposing such a re-direct page,
according to Steele. But the details about which ISPs cooperate with
Rightscorp, and how much they cooperate, is a secret that the company
guards closely.
The reality is, Rightscorp is a tiny company seeking to change the
behavior of industry behemoths like Comcast and Verizon. And while
it seeks to wield a "big stick" in the form of a potential copyright
lawsuit, at the end of the day, it's the company's music industry
customers who would have to take such a bold step.
In the meantime, Steele doesn't want his company to appear
antagonistic. Instead, he paints an optimistic picture that more ISPs
will be coming to his side voluntarily.
"Every month we get more ISPs that are forwarding the notices," he
said. "It's a unique business model, but it works. We believe five years
from now, worldwide, this is how file sharing will be remediated. And
we'll be the company that does it, around the world."
I’m not a soldier, and nor am I a proponent of violent solutions to
any problem when violence can be avoided. I don’t like the idea of
combat, and nor am I looking forward to it, but I consider myself a
member of the militia because once you grasp the big picture of our
precarious reality, you’ll realize that there’s no place else to go. My
joining the militia movement began with the realization that it’s all we
have left, and knowing that in times like this, being a member of the
militia also happens to be the civic duty of all Americans.
Demonstrators are beaten and gassed, the elections process is a farce,
the courts will only run you in circles or imprison you, and any cop you
meet might easily kill you on a whim, and get away with it. We have
absolutely no effective way of petitioning our government for a redress
of grievances, and “our government” happens to be doing all they can to
destroy our nation.
The fact of the matter is that our government has been subverted by
those who have made obvious their desire to kill us all, and we have no
one to turn to for salvation from this horror except ourselves. None of
us likes the idea, and none of us can change what’s coming, but the more
of us who are ready for it, the easier it will be for all involved
parties, including you.
I’ve heard varying estimates, but it’s generally understood by people
who understand these things, that for every soldier killed in war,
there’s between six and ten civilians that die too. What that means is
that when war comes to America, you’ll have no place to hide from it,
but you’ll have better odds of survival by being a soldier rather than
being a civilian. And that means that every American capable of fighting
should be ready to do so immediately, if he’s not too dim-witted to
grasp the basic arithmetic in that formula. It’s very simple. We’re all
being attacked, and although soldiers carry the means of defending
themselves, civilians rarely do.
Hiding in your basement won’t help you when they plow your house over
with a bulldozer. Begging for mercy won’t help when they’re holding you
on the edge of a mass grave to help you receive your good-bye bullet.
And as much as I’d love to live in peace, and escape any horrors of war,
a decade of discovery has taught me to accept the fact that war is
coming to me, whether I like it or not.
You see, we’ve all been declared the enemy because we happen to be
patriotic Americans concerned for our future, and because of this we’re
seen as a hindrance to America’s transition to the full-blown communist
dictatorship our “representatives” have sold us out to. We also happen
to be the owners of the nation they’re trying to steal, so it’ll be very
convenient to have all of us out of the picture.
If you’re one of the many people who are “working toward peaceful
solutions”, I thank you for your efforts, and no one hopes that you find
peaceful solutions more than I do, but please also consider the
possibility of your efforts being futile, and that the ugly future we
all fear may befall us. Surviving that ugly future will require
preparedness.
I first became aware of the Patriot / Militia Movement as a member of
the 9-11 Truth Movement, because in your search for truth, you’ll soon
discover that there are precious few sources of information that both
know the whole story, and aren’t lying about it. The Patriots are that
source of information because since all of their goals demand that the
truth be widely known, they’ll never have a motive to lie. No true
patriot has joined the movement because they’ve sniffed out a profit to
be made, or are trying to sell books or videos. (Alex Jones is NOT part
of the patriot movement; he’s an infiltrator who’s lining his pockets)
The Patriot movement has taught me a lot, and has given me a truer
understanding of our Bill of Rights, and a new knowledge of our court
system and history that’s been kept hidden from us all. As you’re
probably discovering now, most of what’s important is kept hidden from
Americans, and the Patriots are breaking that ice with the more
complete, accurate, and relevant information than anyone else. “From the Trenches World Report” and “Liberty Tree Radio”
have become the sources I turn to for important news, information, and
education, because I’ve seen all of them, and there are no better.
Please tune in and stay informed for everybody’s sake. Much too much of
the “alternative media” is only an extension of the mainstream media,
with the same agenda of deceiving you. The sources I’ve linked are
listener/reader supported, and their information is never skewed or
censored to protect anyone’s financial interests. It’s strictly “truth
only” rather than the info-for-profit / deception that’s come to
dominate the alternative news lately, and that’s a very rare commodity
these days.
And as reluctant as you may be to accept the fact that we’re going to
have to defend ourselves from a violent attack, you’re gong to have to
make that realization eventually, and the sooner you do, the better your
odds of surviving this mess, and saving our country.
And there’s plenty of ways to become involved and be useful. If you
can’t fight, you can probably farm, and produce food. Or you can collect
what’s needed to treat a wounded Patriot, and make it portable. If
you’re a doctor you can brush up on your battlefield surgery, and be
ready to move. If you’re an electrician or communications technician,
you can help with the independent communications system that’s being
built right now. Your rusty old truck might be worth its weight in gold
if it’s readied to provide logistical support. The point is that there’s
a lot to be done, and if this country is going to survive, you’ll not
only have to prepare physically, but you’re also going to have to
prepare yourself psychologically for the harsh future that all of us
spoiled Americans will soon confront.
Stop falling victim to the endless “divide and conquer” tactics
employed by those who seek to destroy this nation, put your petty
differences aside, and start uniting with other patriotic Americans to
save this country before we’re all killed.
We have about twenty times the number of people we need to win right
now, but we’ll be able to end this madness and restore our republic
quickly, and probably without a shot being fired, if we have a fighting
force and all the necessary support personnel in every American
community.
They’re only attacking because they think you’re a helpless coward, and
they’ve spent the last thirty years trying to accomplish that with
media conditioning. If we show ‘em that we’re still real Americans
willing to fight for our country and our freedom, our enemies will
vanish like shadows from a floodlight. We have them outnumbered by an
unstoppable ratio, and they know it. Our enemy’s only hope lies in you
being afraid and uninformed. All we have to do is show the world that
America isn’t filled with cowards and idiots, and we’ll quickly have our
country back as it’s supposed to be. — Jolly Roger
“The most effectual way of preserving peace, is to prepare for war” — George Washington. “I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole of the people, except for few public officials.” — George Mason
Posts
I’m not a soldier, and nor am I a proponent of violent solutions to
any problem when violence can be avoided. I don’t like the idea of
combat, and nor am I looking forward to it, but I consider myself a
member of the militia because once you grasp the big picture of our
precarious reality, you’ll realize that there’s no place else to go. My
joining the militia movement began with the realization that it’s all we
have left, and knowing that in times like this, being a member of the
militia also happens to be the civic duty of all Americans.