Invisible Warfare – Geophysical Weapons of the Secret Government
by Jerry E. Smith http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2013/01/invisible-warfare-geophysical-weapons-of-the-secret-government/
“Others are engaging even in an eco-type of terrorism whereby they
can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through
the use of electromagnetic waves.” – William S. Cohen, U.S. Secretary of
Defense, 1997
The above startling statement was made during a Q&A session
following Secretary Cohen’s keynote address to a Conference on
Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and U.S. Strategy. At the time
he was speaking in his official capacity as United States Secretary of
Defense, so this statement can be taken as an official understanding of
the U.S. government.
After events like the 2004 Asian tsunami and 2005’s record-shattering
Atlantic hurricane season, many people have wondered just how “natural”
those disasters were. Could terrorists or rogue states, or even the
U.S. government, have been involved? Is it really possible to “alter the
climate, set off earthquakes and volcanoes remotely through the use of
electromagnetic waves”?
While the military’s use of electromagnetic waves (radio and other
frequency weapons) is exceedingly difficult to prove, there are indeed
many such weapons systems out there, both on the drawing board and in
the arsenal. One discussed recently in the mainstream press is the
Vehicle Mounted Active Denial System (VMADS), which is like a giant
microwave oven designed for crowd control. It heats the skin of those on
whom it is trained to 180 degrees in less than two seconds. But it’s a
far cry from stunning protesters to altering the climate or setting off
earthquakes — or is it?
Altering the Climate
Control of the weather, at least to some degree, is an established
and expanding field of scientific and commercial endeavor. For example, BusinessWeek
reported on 24 October 2005: “Rainmaking and hail prevention are
considered established arts in some countries. China has 35,000 people
engaged in weather management, and it spends $40 million a year on
alleviating droughts or stemming hail that would damage crops.” In the
U.S. this activity is mainly confined to local governments and privately
owned commercial enterprises, like Weather Modification, Inc. (WMI) of
Fargo, North Dakota. WMI provides services to universities, governmental
agencies, and private sector entities across the country and around the
world, including hail suppression in Argentina, snowpack augmentation
in Idaho, and cloud seeding in Nevada.
Intentional hostile control of the weather and other environmental
processes is collectively called geophysical warfare. In his chapter
entitled “How to Wreck the Environment,” in the 1968 book, Unless Peace Comes,
Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald wrote: “The key to geophysical warfare is
the identification of environmental instabilities to which the addition
of a small amount of energy would release vastly greater amounts of
energy.”
At the time he penned those words Dr. MacDonald was Associate
Director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). He was also a member of
the President’s Science Advisory Committee, and was later made a member
of the President’s Council on Environmental Quality. In an article
entitled simply “Space” (in Toward the Year 2018, 1968), Dr. MacDonald elaborated on the possibilities of geophysical warfare:
By the year 2018, technology will make available to the leaders of
the major nations a variety of techniques for conducting secret warfare,
of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be apprised.
One nation may attack a competitor covertly by bacteriological means,
thoroughly weakening the population (though with a minimum of
fatalities) before taking over with its own overt armed forces.
Alternatively, techniques of weather modification could be employed to
produce prolonged periods of drought or storm, thereby weakening a
nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the
competitor.
If, as Dr. MacDonald wrote, only a few in the military or scientific
community need know what is actually taking place, how would the general
public know if such a war were being fought? Were the dead and
displaced of New Orleans victims of an invisible battle? Many people
around the world are convinced that a covert weather war has, in fact,
been raging for years, possibly decades.
Dr. MacDonald was also a member of the Board of Directors of the
MITRE Corporation, a not-for-profit federally funded R&D company. He
was also a member of two organizations that have been accused of
engaging in globalist conspiracies by anti-New World Order researchers:
the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the secretive JASON Group.
The CFR, with such related organizations as the Trilateral Commission
and the World Federalist Association, is a prominent supporter of
globalization and of global governance schemes, as can be read in their
own magazine Foreign Affairs. JASON is a select group of world
class scientists who conduct studies for different agencies of the U.S.
government. JASON was created in the 1950s as an elite division within
the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA) one of the nation’s highest
level military think tanks.
Dr. MacDonald published numerous papers and articles on future
weapons technology in which he may have been doing more than merely
speculating. His position at the top of the Military-Industrial-Academic
pyramid gave him an unobstructed view of what was really on the drawing
boards. He died under suspicious circumstances and some researchers
believe he was taken out for revealing too much. He wrote of such coming
“advances” as manipulation or control of the weather and climate,
including destructive use of ocean waves and melting or destabilizing of
the polar ice caps; intentional ozone depletion; triggering
earthquakes; and control of the human brain by utilizing the earth’s
energy fields. Today the polar ice caps are indeed melting and holes in
the ozone layer are growing. Could these be the handiwork of advanced
weapons?
Project Faultless
Scientists around the world have recognized and documented several
mechanisms by which human activities have resulted in earthquakes.
Scientists from the Institute of Dynamics of Geospheres at the Russian
Academy of Sciences have observed:
Induced seismicity, or seismic activity caused directly by human
involvement, has been detected as a result of water filling large
surface reservoirs, development of mineral, geothermal and hydrocarbon
resources, waste injection, underground nuclear explosions and
large-scale construction projects. If the stress change is big enough,
it can cause an earthquake, either by fracturing the rock mass — in the
case of mining or underground explosions — or by causing rock to slip
along existing zones of weakness.
Underground nuclear explosions have set off earthquakes. The best
documented of these occurred deep in the vast Nevada desert in 1968.
Under the codename “Project Faultless,” the U.S. government set off a
nuclear weapon on a fault line to see if they could induce an earthquake
— and got one! The U.S. has been engaged in testing nuclear weapons
since 16 July 1945, when the atomic test code-named “Trinity” was
conducted near Alamogordo, New Mexico.
Project Faultless was detonated on 19 January 1968 at a depth of
3,200 feet below ground surface in a remote part of Nevada. Officially,
Faultless was designed to study the behavior and characteristics of
seismic signals generated by nuclear detonations and to differentiate
them from seismic signals generated by naturally occurring earthquakes.
It was intentionally placed on a fault line to see if the high yield
explosion would set off an earthquake. It has been argued that the
scientists in charge were convinced that such was impossible, hence the
name “faultless.”
Michon Mackedon has served as Vice Chairman of the Nevada Commission
on Nuclear Projects since 1986. She tells us the story of this
successfully induced, albeit seemingly unintentional earthquake in her
article, “Project Faultless: Central Nevada’s Near Miss as an Atomic
Proving Ground”:
It has been said that the Trinity test let the nuclear genie out of
the bottle, but it learned to dance on the deserts of Nevada. In 1951,
the Nevada Test Site (NTS), located 90 miles north of Las Vegas was
selected to serve as the nation’s continental atomic proving ground.
Over the next four decades, The Nevada Test Site became home to 928
nuclear tests. One hundred of the tests conducted there were atmospheric
tests — dropped by aircraft or exploded from towers, balloons, or
cannons — producing the signature mushroom cloud and dangerous
radioactive fallout. In 1963, under the terms of a Limited Test Ban
Treaty signed by President Kennedy and Russia’s Kruschev, all the tests
were moved underground. The remaining 828 NTS nuclear tests were
conducted in shafts and tunnels. […]
The move to underground testing, while reducing fallout danger,
produced ground motion which could be felt in Las Vegas. The larger the
test the greater the ground motion: the swaying earth and occasional
shattered glass window were making tourists, residents, and casino
operators quite nervous. … [Casino owner] Howard Hughes stepped into the
picture to add more pressure on the AEC to move megaton testing away
from Las Vegas to central Nevada. Hughes became convinced that the
increasingly large underground tests at NTS would ruin the Vegas gaming
industry. He became quite vocal in his opposition to megaton testing at
NTS, and his organization even tried to delay one of the larger NTS
tests. …
On 19 June 1992 the U.S. conducted an underground atom bomb test at
the NTS which was followed by another test just four days later. A
series of heavy earthquakes as high as 7.6 on the Richter scale rocked
the Mojave Desert 176 miles to the south three days after the second
test. Only 22 hours after that an “unrelated” earthquake of 5.6 struck
less than twenty miles from the NTS itself. It was the biggest
earthquake ever recorded near the test site. It caused one million
dollars in damage to buildings at Yucca Mountain, the intended site of
the nation’s high-level repository for radioactive waste. The Yucca
Mountain facility was only fifteen miles from the epicenter of the
earthquake.
In a statement issued on 14 July 1992 responding to the
“understandable unease” expressed by the public, the Department of
Energy (DoE) in Washington, D.C. — having conveniently forgotten Project
Faultless — asserted the relationship between nuclear testing and
earthquakes was “nonexistent.”
Evidence for this “nonexistent” connection may well be seen in events
that occurred prior to the largest earthquake of the 20th Century,
which took place in Tangshan in North-East China on 27 July 1976. It
measured 8.2 and killed 800,000 people. Only five days earlier the
French had tested a bomb in the Mururoa atoll in the Pacific. Four days
later the United States tested a bomb in Nevada. Twenty-four hours later
the earthquake hit China. Merely a “coincidence”? Many scientists don’t
think so. For example, New Scientist reported on 12 October 1978:
Geophysicists in Germany and England believe the 1978 earthquake in
Tabas, Iran, in which at least twenty-five thousand people were killed,
may have been triggered by an underground nuclear explosion. … British
seismologists believe the Tabas earthquake implies a nuclear test that
has gone awry. … Moreover, a seismic laboratory in Uppsala, Sweden,
recorded a Soviet nuclear test of unusual size — ten megatons — at
Semipalitinsk only thirty-six hours before. … One German scientist
specifically implicated this test in the origin of Tabas disaster.
It Starts with a Ripple
Another scientist studying the link between nukes and earthquakes is
Gary T. Whiteford, Professor of Geography at the University of New
Brunswick in Canada. Whiteford made a study of all earthquakes of the
20th Century that were stronger than 5.8 on the Richter scale. “Below
that intensity,” he explained, “some earthquakes would have passed
unrecorded in the earlier part of the century when measuring devices
were less sensitive and less ubiquitous. But for bigger quakes the
records are detailed and complete for the entire planet.”
Whiteford plotted the earthquake rate for the first half of the
century, before nuclear testing, and compared it to the rate for 1950 to
1988. His data showed that in the fifty years prior to testing, large
earthquakes of more than 5.8 occurred at an average rate of 68 per year.
With the advent of nuclear weapons testing the earthquake rate rose
“suddenly and dramatically” to a nearly doubled average of 127 a year.
As Whiteford comments, “The geographical patterns in the data, with a
clustering of earthquakes in specific regions matched to specific test
dates and sites, do not support the easy and comforting explanation of
‘pure coincidence.’ It is a dangerous coincidence.”
If Whiteford’s correlations are correct, more than a million people
may have died in earthquakes triggered by nuclear tests. Of course, the
governments of the nuclear nations claim these results are merest
coincidence. Officially, the DoE maintains that even their most powerful
nuclear tests had no impact beyond a radius of fifteen miles. Whiteford
speculated that although the reverberations may fade within fifteen
miles of a test, they are merely the first ripple of a wave that travels
through the planet’s crust and spreads around the globe.
In a 1991 interview with California State seismologist, Dr. Lalliana
Mualchin, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation inquired into the long-term
effects of nuclear weapons testing. Mualchin was asked if the cumulative
effect of testing might be to trigger earthquakes and volcanoes. His
answer was: “A single nuclear test may have little effect on the earth,
like that of an insect biting an elephant. But the cumulative effect
might move the earth’s tectonic plates in a manner similar to how a
swarm of insects might start an elephant running.”
Mualchin added, “If an insect bites an elephant in a sensitive spot,
such as an eye or an ear, then there might be a vast movement out of all
proportion to the size of the bite.” This statement is a stunning
analogy to Dr. Gordon MacDonald’s assertion that, “The key to
geophysical warfare is the identification of environmental instabilities
to which the addition of a small amount of energy would release vastly
greater amounts of energy.”
Earthquakes and Electromagnetic Waves
Let’s return to Secretary Cohen’s contention that eco-terrorists may
be able to produce earthquakes using electromagnetic waves. Perhaps, as
the DoE maintains, a nuke really cannot transfer physical mechanical
energy beyond a few miles but what if it is something else? Could the
wave that Whiteford spoke of have an electromagnetic component?
The Washington Times reported 29 March 1992 on the incidence
of extremely low frequency (ELF) radio signals being associated with
earthquakes, stating: “Satellites and ground sensors detected mysterious
radio waves or related electrical magnetic activity before major
earthquakes in Southern California during 1986-87, Armenia in 1988, and
Japan and Northern California in 1989.” An Athens University physicist
was also reported to have observed electromagnetic signals in six out of
seven quakes in Greece over several years.
Scientists have demonstrated that under certain conditions, and if
subjected to high enough pressure, crystals can be forced to give off a
flow of electricity, called piezoelectricity. These earthquake precursor
signals, then, could have been the result of tectonically induced
piezoelectricity. That is, pressure in the earth’s crust could squeeze
some types of rocks so hard that they discharge electricity. The
electrical flow would have electromagnetic effects, including a
“broadcast” in the ELF range.
Elizabeth A. Rauscher Ph.D. was a staff researcher at Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory, in Berkeley, California, for over nineteen
years and taught at Berkeley, Stanford, J.F. Kennedy University and the
University of Nevada. She holds three U.S. patents with Dr. William L.
Van Bise, Sc.D., an electrical engineer. They called the Earthquake
Prediction Registry at the Library of Congress on 8 January 1994 to
report impending events likely to occur within thirty days. Unique
signals from the earth indicated that one or more quakes would occur in
or near the Los Angeles area. The Northridge quake struck nine days
later on 17 January. Unusual surges of signals from 3.8 to 4.0 Hz were
recorded beginning two weeks before the quake.
Previously, Drs. Rauscher and Van Bise had attended an International
Workshop held at Lake Arrowhead, California, 14-17 June 1992 with the
title: “Low Frequency Electrical Precursors: Fact or Fiction?” Rauscher
and Van Bise presented a paper on measurements of ELF signals. Rauscher
announced that a magnitude 7 or greater earthquake would strike “in the
region of the conference, very soon.” On 28 June the Landers quake,
(M7.5), struck 44 miles east of the conference site; several hours later
Big Bear Lake, only twenty miles east, was hit by a M6.6 temblor.
ELF waves may be a natural component of earthquake phenomena. The
question is, by mimicking natural forces or by exploiting weaknesses in
nature as Dr. MacDonald suggested, could the military, rogue states or
terrorists cause earthquakes by generating the right sort of ELF waves?
Scalar Weapons
Another possibility is use of the electromagnetic pulse (EMP) to
generate earthquakes. An EMP is a burst of radiation released as part of
a nuclear explosion. The EMP is essentially an electric field and a
magnetic field moving away from the blast. The electromagnetic pulse
burns out electronic circuitry, destroying communications systems,
computers, and other sophisticated electronic instruments. An EMP
released by a single large nuclear explosion over the central United
States could cause an electrical blackout devastating the entire
country.
According to Defense News 13-19 April 1992, the U.S.
deployed an electromagnetic pulse weapon in Desert Storm (Gulf War I).
The EMP not only exists, but means have been found to generate it
artificially and to use it as a weapon. If the EMP is the part of the
atom bomb explosion that triggers distant earthquakes, it is but a short
step to building EMP/earthquake weapons.
Some researchers, like Capt. Bruce L. Cathie, believe that the Earth
is surrounded by an electromagnetic field that exists in more than four
dimensions. If true, this could explain a lot of effects without
discernable cause events, and the existence of an entire class of
weapons undreamt of in conventional Newtonian physics, known as “scalar”
weapons.
Dr. Andrija Puharich was an experimental researcher and physician,
and one of the world’s leading “mad” scientists with numerous patents
granted in medicine and electronics. Puharich designed devices emitting
extremely low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic waves that he believed
could affect the mind.
In January 1978, Dr. Puharich issued a detailed research paper
entitled “Global Magnetic Warfare: A Layman’s View of Certain
Artificially Induced Unusual Effects On The Planet Earth during 1976 and
1977.” He was primarily looking into the Soviet experiments with a
technology originally developed by the Yugoslavian-American genius
Nicola Tesla, called the Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT). Controlled
earthquakes, he believed, were part and parcel of that work. Of them he
wrote: “Of the many great earthquakes of 1976, there is one that demands
special attention — the July 28, 1976 Tangshan, China earthquake.”
Earlier, we examined that quake and the possibility that French and
American nukes could have triggered it. Puharich also believed that it
was artificially induced. Some of his evidence was reflected in a piece
in the New York Times which reported that on 5 June 1977, “just
before the first tremor at 3:42 AM, the sky lit up ‘like daylight.’ The
multi-hued lights, mainly white and red, were seen up to 200 miles
away. Leafs on many trees were burned to a crisp and growing vegetables
were scorched on one side, as if by a fireball.”
In FER DE LANCE: A Briefing On Soviet Scalar Electromagnetic Weapons,
Lt. Col Thomas E. Bearden (ret), Ph.D. contends that “the future of
humanity has been hi-jacked for more than fifty years by the
weaponization of scalar electromagnetics and … the Western scientific
community has been blind-sided by dogmatic adherence to 1867 electrical
theory.” Lecturing at a symposium of the United States Psychotronics
Association in 1981, Bearden defined the Soviet weapons as TMTs:
Tesla found that he could set up standing waves … in the molten core
of the earth, or, just set it up through the rocks, the telluric
activity in the rocks would furnish activity into these waves and one
would get more potential energy in those waves than he put in. He called
the concept, the magnifying transmitter.
Bearden elsewhere described the working of TMTs:
They will go through anything. What you do is set up a standing wave
through the Earth and the molten core of the Earth begins to feed that
wave (We are talking Tesla now). When you have that standing wave, you
have set up a triode. What you’ve done is that the molten core of the
earth is feeding the energy and its like your signal … is gating the
gate of a triode. … If you change the frequency one way (dephase it) you
dump the energy up in the atmosphere beyond the point on the other side
of the earth that you focused upon. You start ionizing the air, you can
change the weather flow patterns (jet streams, etc.), you can change
all that if you dump it gradually … you influence the heck out of the
weather … its a great weather machine.
Could this be what Secretary of Defense William Cohen was referring
to in his Q&A session on eco-terrorism and WMDs when he stated it
was possible to “alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes
remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves”? In the use of these
alleged weapons we see all of these factors combined.
If it is possible to set off earthquakes via electromagnetic waves or
other means, can tsunamis be caused by underwater earthquakes? Bearden
claims that after the breakup of the Soviet Union, Russian scientists
sold this technology to other hostile elements such as the Yakusa, the
Japanese “Mafia,” who used it to create the 2004 Asian tsunami.
This brings us back to Secretary of Defense Cohen’s claim that
terrorists possess this technology. It is really possible? Or, it is all
just a vast hoax intended to frighten us into demanding more big
government?
©2007, Jerry E. Smith. Jerry has been a writer, editor and activist
for nearly four decades. In the early 1990s, he was the Executive
Director of the National UFO Museum in Reno, Nevada. His bibliography of
published works includes scores of articles and reviews, over a dozen
ghost-written books, and three non-fiction works published by Adventures
Unlimited Press:
Weather Warfare: The Military’s Plan to Draft Mother Nature (2006),
HAARP: The Ultimate Weapon of the Conspiracy (1998), and
Secrets of the Holy Lance: The Spear Of Destiny In History & Legend (2005), co-authored with George Piccard, author of
Liquid Conspiracy: JFK, LSD, the CIA, Area 51, and UFOs (1999).
References
Air University of the US Air Force. “AF 2025 Final Report.”
http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/index.htm
Bearden, Lt. Col. Thomas E. (ret).
Fer de Lance: A Briefing On Soviet Scalar Electromagnetic Weapons. Tesla Book Company, 1986. (Bearden’s website: www.cheniere.org/index2.html)
Begich, Nick, and Jeane Manning.
Angels Don’t Play This HAARP: Advances In Tesla Technology. Earthpulse Press, 1995.
Bertell, Rosalie.
Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War. The Women’s Press Ltd., 2000.
Bilger, Ray.
Human Engineered Earthquakes. www.rense.com/political/weapons/earthqk.htm
Bingham, Eugene. “Devastating tsunami bomb viable, say experts.”
The New Zealand Herald, September 28, 1999.
Bingham, Eugene. “Tsunami bomb NZ’s devastating war secret.”
The New Zealand Herald, September 25, 1999.
Centner, Christopher et al. “Environmental Warfare: Implications for
Policymakers and War Planners.” Maxwell AFB, Ala.: Air Command and Staff
College, May 1995.
Pimiento Chamorro, Susana, Edward Hammond. “Addressing Environmental
Modification in Post-Cold War Conflict, The Convention on the
Prohibition of Military or Any other Hostile Use of Environmental
Modification Techniques (ENMOD) and Related Agreements. The Edmonds
Institute, 2001.
Chossudovsky, Michael. “Washington’s New World Order Weapons Have the Ability to Trigger Climate Change.”
Center for Research on Globalization, 2002.
www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO201A.html.
Cohen, William S., keynote address. DoD News Briefing, April 28,
1997: [transcript] Conference on Terrorism, Weapons of Mass Destruction,
and U.S. Strategy, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.
www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=674
Congressional Research Service. Weather Modification. University Press of the Pacific, 2004.
Console, Rodolfo and Alexei Nikolaev (Editors).
Earthquakes Induced by Nuclear Explosions: Environmental and Ecological Problems (NATO ASI Series. Series 2, Environment, Vol 4). Springer-Verlag Telos, 1995.
Foreign Policy Association.
Toward the Year 2018. Cowles Education Corp., 1968.
Frisby, E. M. “Weather-modification in Southeast Asia, 1966-1972.”
The Journal of Weather Modification Vol. 14, No. 1 (April 1982).
Fulghum, David A. “USAF Acknowledges Beam Weapon Readiness.”
Aviation Week & Space Technology, October 4, 2002.
GlobalSecurity.org. “Vehicle-Mounted Active Denial System (V-MADS)”
www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/v-mads.htm
Haliburton, Mary-Sue. “Weather Modification a Long-Established, Though Secretive, Reality.”
Pure Energy Systems News, Sept. 6, 2005.
Interfax News Agency. “U.S. HAARP Weapon Development Concerns Russian Duma.” August 10, 2002.
Jeffrey, Jason. “Earthquakes: Natural or Man-Made?”
New Dawn No. 89, March-April 2005.
Lambakis, Steven, James Kiras, Kristin Kolet. “Understanding ‘Asymmetric’ Threats to the United States.”
National Institute for Public Policy, September 2002.
www.nipp.org
MacDonald, Gordon J. F. “Geophysical Warfare: How to Wreck the Environment.” In:
Unless Peace Comes: A Scientific Forecast of New Weapons, Calder, Nigel (Ed), Penguin 1968.
Mackedon, Michon. “Project Faultless: Central Nevada’s Near Miss as
an Atomic Proving Ground.” Eureka County Yucca Mountain Information
Office.
http://www.yuccamountain.org/
Nakamura, Karen. “Abnormal Phenomena With Nuclear Tests, Earthquakes And The Atmosphere.”
The Coastal Post, August, 1996.
Nikolaev NI:
On the state of study of induced earthquakes, related with industrial activity. In: An influence of industrial activity on the seismic regime. Moscow: Nauka, 1977.
Pasechnik IP:
Earthquakes induced by underground nuclear explosions. In: An influence of industrial activity on the seismic regime. Moscow: Nauka, 1977.
Pond, Dale, Walter Baumgartner.
Nikola Tesla’s Earthquake Machine: With Tesla’s Original Patents Plus New Blueprints to Build Your Own Working Model. Message Company, 1995.
Ponte, L. “Pentagon & Kremlin Are Playing With Our Weather And Giving Us Storms and Floods.”
Star Magazine, July, 1982.
Port, Otis. “Rainmaking Has Its True Believers, And Skeptics.”
BusinessWeek, October 24, 2005.
Purrett, Louise A. “Weather Modification As A Future Weapon: The Military May Have Added The Weather To Its Arsenal.”
Science News, April 15, 1972, Vol. 101.
Van der Reijden, Joël. “JASON Group: Part-time defense think tank for
university professors.” Project for the Exposure of Hidden Institutions
(PEHI), November 17, 2006.
http://home.planet.nl/~reijd050/organisations/JASON_Group.htm
Rosenberg, Eric. “New Face of Terrorism: Radio-Frequency Weapons.”
Hearst Newspapers, 1997.
Semler, Eric, James Benjamin and Adam Gross; Sarah Rosenfield, Senior Researcher.
The Language of Nuclear War: An Intelligent Citizen’s Dictionary. Harper & Row, 1987.
Shapley, Deborah. “Weather Warfare: Pentagon Concedes 7-Year Vietnam Effort.”
Science, June 7, 1974.
Simpson DW:
Triggered Earthquakes. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet Sci. 14 (1986): 21-42.
Sweetman, Bill. “
High-power microwave weapons – full power ahead?”
Jane’s Defence Weekly, 25 August 2006
Whiteford, Gary: “Nuclear Bomb Tests and Earthquakes: Dangerous Patterns and Trends.”
Pulse of the Planet 2:10-21 Fall 1989.
Posts
A
crucible is defined as a place or occasion of a severe test or trial,
and I would suggest that the parking garage sequence is probably the
greatest crucible, or test, of the entire X-Files. So why is that?
Simple – this next conversation represents a massive shift in thinking
as compared to the entire series. For nine seasons and two movies we
have learned of the Alien Colonization program. Entire websites, even
sections of books, have been devoted to dismantling the science fiction
out of the show to prove the colonization program is real. It also
represents a crucible for us, the viewers. We are about to under take a
massive paradigm shift, a paradigm shift I myself underwent many years
ago when I realized the UFO phenomenon was in fact not aliens but red
blooded humans. It’s a mind binder so why not start it with a simple
message – “Don’t Give Up.” A all too real message for all of us.
Ok
so the crucible, and the really important stuff. So at minute 39 we
are left with Scully, a bit confused, staring at her car and this
message when who should emerge from the darkness but Mulder and now the
grand statement:
