---BREAKAWAY CIVILIZATION ---ALTERNATIVE HISTORY---NEW BUSINESS MODELS--- ROCK & ROLL 'S STRANGE BEGINNINGS---SERIAL KILLERS---YEA AND THAT BAD WORD "CONSPIRACY"--- AMERICANS DON'T EXPLORE ANYTHING ANYMORE.WE JUST CONSUME AND DIE.---
Posted by George Freund on November 15, 2015 ~ hehe C folks if "we" would just let "them" jam thum trodes UP ALL "our" ass's fuck~in BAM !?! "we'd" ALL b ...safe yup, yep, um hum just fucking PUFFFF alll "these" bad things that just happen ??? .... gone ...so this might feel a lil strange but if u just bend over & ????? https://in.pinterest.com/pin/420101471461385005/
Greek
authorities believe that two of the gunmen sneaked into Europe posing
as a refugee from Syria, with one registering in Leros on October 3 French official admitted 'failure of intelligence' as vital clues were missed Heavily armed suspect was stopped but anti-terror chiefs were not alerted One attacker was Parisian and had been on terror watch for five years Two gunmen also sneaked into Europe by posing as refugees from Syria
Just
three. How efficient. I was expecting many more. Remember if you let it
happen on purpose LIHOP, you made it happen on purpose MIHOP.
“We Were Prepared”: Counter-Terrorism Exercise on “Multi-Site Attacks” Took Place On Same Day As Paris Terrorist Attacks ~ Oops folks "always" a "DRILL"/
"Exercise" 'just' "happens" 2 B go~in ...on ??? & NOBODY C's an ...pattern ...yet , man thank fucking god "we" r soooooooooooooooooooooo lucky ! fer thum drills
He said that the Paris emergency services were so well prepared, because “as luck would have it“, they had been planning for a similar scenario. Transcript: “As luck would have it, in the morning at the Paris SAMU (EMT), a multi-site attack exercise had been planned.” “So we were prepared. What needs to be known is there was a
mobilisation of police forces, firemen, EMTs, associations who came [to
participate] and we tried to save as many people as possible.” TV Broadcast
Le hasard a fait, pour vous dire, c’est que le matin au SAMU de
Paris, avait été organisé un exercice sur des attentats multisites. Donc
on était préparés. Donc ce qu’il faut voir c’est que vous aviez une
mobilisation des forces de police, des pompiers, des SAMU, des
associatifs qui sont venus et on a essayé de sauver le plus de monde
possible.
Another tragic event
has caught the attention of the world, and our thoughts, prayers, and
hearts go out to all those who are suffering in Paris today.
Unfortunately, even in the depths of sorrow, we must retain a critical
eye and we must ensure that justice is served to the people who have
lost their lives or their loved ones. This event resembles other
incidents which the media labels ‘terrorist attacks,’ and I am equally
skeptical about the motivation behind this one. As University of Ottawa
Professor Emeritus of Economics and Canadian economist Dr. Michel
Chossudovsky has argued:
“A criminal
undertaking at a global level … and there is an ongoing war … The global
war on terrorism … which is fake, it’s based on fake premises. It tells
us that somehow America and the Western world are going after a
fictitious enemy, the Islamic state, when in fact the Islamic state is
fully supported and financed by the Western military alliance … They say
Muslims are terrorists, but it just so happens that terrorists are Made
in America. . . . The global war on terrorism is a fabrication, a big
lie and a crime against humanity.” (source)(source)
You may be thinking that just because
one educated individual believes this, it is not necessarily true.
That’s certainly a valid point, but it’s not just one scholar making
these claims — multiple academics have been trying to use their reach
within ‘mainstream’ academia to create awareness about false flag
terrorism, a phenomena which includes incidents like 9/11.
“All three buildings were destroyed by carefully planned, orchestrated and executed controlled demolition.” –
Professor Lynn Margulis, Department of Geosciences, University of
Massachusetts at Amherst and National Academy of Science member, one of
many academics who has been very outspoken regarding 9/11 (source) (source)
Thoughts On Media Coverage
When it comes to the terrorist attacks
in France, Chossudovsky wrote on an alternative news website that he
owns and operates that the media coverage of the tragic events which
just occurred were actually linked up with the war in the Middle East:
The media
coverage of these tragic events was casually linked up with the war in
the Middle East, highlighting France’s commitment –alongside its allies–
in waging a “humanitarian war” against the terrorists.
The Islamic State was identified as the architect of the attacks.
The attacks were described
without evidence as an act of revenge and retribution against France for
having bombed ISIS strongholds in Syria and Iraq as part of Obama’s
counter-terrorism air campaign. (source)
The article then argues that the attacks were known about before hand,
“The political discourse is in some regards reminiscent of the 9/11 attacks and the statements of George W. Bush et al.”(source)
It then concludes by emphasizing
something which more people around the world are beginning to understand
— that the United States, France, and their allies (Britain, Israel,
Turkey, etc.) are covertly supporting these so-called affiliated
terrorist groups in Syria and Iraq.
“France is the victim of the
Islamic State, but at the same time the US and its allies including
France are ‘State Sponsors’ of the Islamic state which is an Al Qaeda
affiliated entity. Lest we forget, the US has supported Al Qaeda and its
affiliated organizations for almost half a century since the heyday of the Soviet Afghan war. “ (source)
ISIS is the alleged culprit behind the
attacks, but if ISIS is the creation of the Western World, ask yourself,
what is really going on here?
“The truth is, there is no
Islamic army or terrorist group called Al-Qaeda, and any informed
intelligence officer knows this. But, there is a propaganda campaign to
make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity
representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a
unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The
country behind this propaganda is the United States.” – Former British Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook
Every year these events pass, and every
year we offer our sincerest prayers, thoughts, and love to the victims
of such cruelty. What we fail to do, however, is recognize that this
‘global elite’ continues to orchestrate these events over and over
again. Our lack of awareness and failure to acknowledge this type of
information on a global level is one factor that allows these
injustices to continue. Terrorist attacks around the world have been
state sponsored for years, and they are used to pass certain laws and
justify aggression and invasion of various countries. It’s time to wake
up.
“A power has risen up in the
government greater than the people themselves, consisting of many, and
various, and powerful interests, combined into one mass, and held
together by the cohesive power of the vast surplus in the banks.”
— John C. Calhoun, the 7th Vice President of the United States (to see
similiar quotes from a variety of presidents and politicians please
click here)
Related CE Articles and more on False Flag Terrorism:
Within one hour of the Paris attacks and without any evidence,
the story was set in stone that the perpetrator was ISIL. This is the
way propagada works. When the West does it, it always succeeds, because the world is
accustomed to following the lead of the West. I was amazed to see, for
example, Russian news services helping to spread the official story of
the Paris attacks despite Russia herself having suffered so often from
planted false stories. Has the Russian media forgotten MH-17? The minute the story was
reported that the Malaysian airliner was hit by a Russian missile over
eastern Ukraine in the hands of separatists, the blame was ascribed to
Russia. And that is where the blame remains despite the absence of
evidence. Has the Russian media also forgotten the “Russian invasion of
Ukraine”? This preposterous story is accepted everywhere in the West as
gospel. Has the Russian media forgot about the book by the German newspaper
editor who wrote that every European journalist of consequence was an
asset of the CIA? One would have thought that experience would have taught Russian media sources to be
careful about explanations that originate in the West. So now we have what is likely to be another false story set in stone.
Just as a few Saudis with box cutters outwitted the entire US national
security state, ISIL managed to acquire unacquirable weapons and outwit
French intelligence while organizing a series of attacks in Paris. Why did ISIL do this? Blowback for France’s small role in Washington’s Middle East violence?
Why not the US instead? Or was ISIL’s purpose to have the flow of refugees into Europe
blocked by closed borders? Does ISIL really want to keep all of its
opponents in Syria and Iraq when instead it can drive them out to
Europe? Why have to kill or control millions of people by preventing
their flight? Don’t expect any explanations or questions from the media about the story that is set in stone. The threat to the European political establishment is not ISIL. The
threats are the rising anti-EU, anti-immigrant political parties: Pegida
in Germany, the UK Independence Party, and the National Front in
France. The latest poll shows the National Front’s Marine Le Pen leading
as the likely French president. Something had to be done about the hords of refugees from
Washington’s wars, or the establishment political parties faced defeat
at the hands of political parties that are also unfriendly to Europe’s
subservience to Washington. EU rules about refugees and immigrants and Germany’s acceptance of
one million of the refugees, together with heavy criticism of those
governments in Eastern Europe that wanted to put up fences to keep out
the refugees, made closing borders impossible. With the Paris terror attacks, what was impossible became possible,
and the President of France immediately announced the closing of
France’s borders. The border closings will spread. The main issue of the
rising dissident political parties will be defused. The EU will be
safe, and so will Washington’s sovereignty over Europe. Whether or not the Paris attacks were a false flag operation for the
purpose of obtaining these results, these results are the consequences
of the attacks. These results serve the interests of the European
political establishment and Washington. Is ISIL so unsophisticated not to have realized that? If ISIL is that
unsophisticated, how did ISIL so easily deceive French intelligence?
Indeed, can French intelligence be intelligent? Can Western peoples be intelligent to fall for a story set in stone
prior to any evidence? In the West, facts are created by self-serving
statements from governments. Investigation is not part of the process.
When 90 percent of the US media is owned by six mega-corporations, it
cannot be any different. As The Matrix grows in the absurdity of its claims, it nevertheless manages to become even more invulnerable. Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary
of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall
Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News
Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university
appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following.
Roberts’ latest books areThe Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West and How America Was Lost.
One of the terrorists involved in last night’s attacks in
Paris has been officially identified as a Parisian, according to local
media reports. The man, who was killed at the Bataclan, was identified using his
fingerprints and was from the southern Parisian neighbourhood of
Courcouronnes. French reports say that the man, who was around 30 years old, was
already known to French anti-terrorist authorities prior to last night’s
attacks.
Similarly in January 2015 in the wake of the “Charlie Hebdo attack” which left 12 dead, it was revealed
that French security agencies tracked the perpetrators for nearly a
decade beforehand, having arrested at least one terrorist a total of two
times, incarcerating him at least once, tracked two of them overseas
where they had trained with known terrorist organizations and possibly
fought alongside them in Syria, before tracking them back to French
territory. Astoundingly, French security agencies never moved in on the
terrorists, claiming that after a decade of tracking them, they had
finally decided to close their case for precisely the amount of time
needed for them to plan and execute their grand finale.
More Wars and More Surveillance Can’t Help
With a similar scenario now emerging, particularly in the wake of the
“Charlie Hebdo attack,” where French security agencies knew about
extremists but failed to stop them before carrying out yet another
high-profile attack, even with enhanced surveillance powers granted to
them by recent legislation, it appears that no amount of intrusive
surveillance or foreign wars will stem a terrorist problem the French
government itself seems intent on doing nothing to stop. The
problem is not France’s immigration laws. Dangerous people are in
France, but they are being tracked by French security agencies. The
problem is not Syria. Terrorists have left to fight there, acquired
deadly skills and affiliations before returning to France, but have
likewise been tracked by French security agencies. Instead, the problem
is that French security agencies are doing nothing about these dangerous
individuals knowingly living, working, and apparently plotting in the
midst of French society. In the coming hours and days, the French government and its various
co-conspirators in their proxy war against Syria will propose a plan of
action they claim will stem the terrorist threat France and the rest of
Europe faces. But the reality is, the problem is not something the
French government can solve, because the problem is clearly the French
government itself.
ISIS is Behind the Paris Attacks, But Who is Behind ISIS?
With the so-called “Islamic State” (ISIS) emerging as being behind
the attack, the question that remains is, who is behind ISIS itself?
While the West has attempted to maintain the terrorist organization
possesses almost mythological abilities, capable of sustaining combat
operations against Syria, Iraq, Lebanon’s Hezbollah, support from Iran,
and now the Russian military – all while carrying out large-scale,
high-profile terrorist attacks across the globe – it is clear that ISIS
is the recipient of immense multinational state-sponsorship. The rise of ISIS was revealed as early as 2007 in interviews conducted by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh in his 9-page report “The Redirection.”
The interviews revealed a plan to destabilize and overthrow the
government of Syria through the use of sectarian extremists – more
specifically, Al Qaeda – with arms and funds laundered through America’s
oldest and stanchest regional ally, Saudi Arabia. A more recent Department of Intelligence Agency (DIA) report drafted in 2012 (.pdf) admitted:
If the situation unravels there is the possibility of
establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern
Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting
powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime,
which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and
Iran).
The DIA report enumerates precisely who these “supporting powers” are:
The West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition; while Russia, China, and Iran support the regime.
And to this day, by simply looking at any number of maps detailing
territory held by various factions amid the Syrian conflict, it is clear
that ISIS is not a “state” of any kind, but an ongoing invasion
emanating from NATO-member Turkey’s territory, with its primary supply corridor crossing the Turkish-Syrian border between the Syrian town of Ad Dana and the western bank of the Euphrates River, a supply corridor now increasingly shrinking. Image:
ISIS-held territory seen in dark grey forms a corridor directly up to
the Syrian-Turkish border – or more accurately, begins at the
Turkish-Syrian border. In recent days, this corridor has faced being
completely cut off by joint Syrian-Russian gains in and around Aleppo
and toward the western bank of the Euphrates River. East of the
Euphrates is already held by Kurds and Syrian forces. NATO is clearly
providing ISIS’ primary support, and yet ISIS is alleged to have been
behind an attack on a NATO member. In
fact, the desperation exhibited by the West and its efforts to oust the
Syrian government and salvage its proxy force now being decimated by
joint Syrian-Russian military operations, is directly proportional to
the diminishing size and stability of this corridor. Just last week, Syrian forces reestablished firm control over the
Kweyris military airport, which was under siege for years. The airport
is just 20 miles from the Euphrates, and, as Syrian forces backed by
Russian airpower work their way up toward the Turkish border along the
Syrian coast, constitutes a unified front that will essentially cut off
ISIS deeper inside Syria for good. Should ISIS’ supply lines be cut in the north, the organization’s
otherwise inexplicable fighting capacity will atrophy. The window for
the West’s “regime change” opportunity is quickly closing, and perhaps
in a last ditch effort, France has jammed the spilled blood and broken
bodies of its own citizens beneath the window to prevent it from closing
for good. The reality is that France knew the “Charlie Hebdo” attackers, they
knew beforehand those involved in the most recent Paris attack, and they
likely know of more waiting for their own opportunity to strike. With
this knowledge, they stood by and did nothing. What’s more, it appears
that instead of keeping France safe, the French government has chosen to
use this knowledge as a weapon in and of itself against the perception
of its own people, to advance its geopolitical agenda abroad. If the people of France want to strike hard at those responsible for
repeated terrorist attacks within their borders, they can start with
those who knew of the attacks and did nothing to stop them, who are
also, coincidentally, the same people who helped give rise to ISIS and
help perpetuate it to this very day. Tony Cartalucci’s articles have appeared on many alternative media websites, including his own at Land Destroyer Report, Alternative Thai News Network and LocalOrg.
November 8th, 2015 http://www.cryptogon.com/It’s a bit of a worry that a nearly point-by-point facsimile of my 2002 warning about this has just appeared in the New York Times… God damn conspiracy theorists! If the whole thing suddenly goes pop, just know that the feds knew
about this at least as far back as the mid-1990s, when I was looking at
it in college. In the years since, the threat has snowballed beyond
anything even I could have imagined back then while wearing my
Ultimate-Doom propeller beanie. Via: New York Times: WITHIN the last year there have been 16 so-called fiber cuts in
the San Francisco Bay Area. According to the F.B.I., someone or some
group has been going through manholes to sever fiber optic cables that
supply telecommunications to large sections of the region, which is home
to technology companies, academic institutions and Lawrence Livermore
National Laboratory, overseer of the nation’s nuclear weapons.
Following each incident (usually occurring late at night and
involving two or three separate fiber cuts) residents couldn’t make land
or mobile calls, not even to 911, or send texts or emails. Hospital
records in some instances were inaccessible. Credit cards and A.T.M.s
didn’t work. And forget about Googling, watching Netflix or remotely
turning on a coffee maker. (For security reasons, Lawrence Livermore
declined to say how the cuts affected its operations.)
When we talk about the Internet, we talk about clouds and ether. But
the Internet is not amorphous. You may access it wirelessly, but
ultimately you’re relying on a bunch of physical cables that are
vulnerable to attack. It’s something that’s been largely forgotten in
the lather over cybersecurity. The threat is not only malicious code
flowing through the pipes but also, and perhaps more critically, the
pipes themselves.
Most worrisome are the throughways and junctures that handle enormous
amounts of Internet traffic. It would be as if a major interstate
highway or crucial interchange were closed and all the traffic was
forced onto side streets. There would be gridlock, and some of those
side streets might collapse under the weight. Data transfer would slow
significantly or come to a halt, as has happened in Northern California.
Surprisingly, there isn’t even a good map of the Internet’s highways
and byways to clearly show locations that, if taken out, would severely
hamper the system. “Everybody assumes somebody knows, but after a while
you find out nobody actually knows,” said Paul Barford, a professor of
computer science at the University of Wisconsin who has made it his
mission to find out where the vulnerabilities are.
He recently completed a map of the United States’ long-haul Internet
infrastructure — stretches that span at least 30 miles and connect
population centers of at least 100,000 people. It took him four years of
cajoling information from commercial broadband providers and collecting
public records to come up with a reasonably reliable map. Notably, his
research was partly funded by the Department of Homeland Security and
can be accessed only by D.H.S.-approved researchers.
“What we’re trying to avoid is giving bad guys a map to do bad
things,” Professor Barford said. “Now that we can see the possible pinch
points in the U.S., we are looking at ways to mitigate them.”
Security experts and networking engineers said they were most
concerned about where major networks converge. These are called Internet
exchange points, or I.X.P.s, where networks come together like highway
interchanges to trade traffic, which is known as peering.
There are about 80 I.X.P.s in the United States but only a handful,
including ones in New York City, Miami, Los Angeles, Seattle and outside
Washington, are vital interchanges for domestic as well as
international traffic coming from undersea cables from abroad (which are
also vulnerable to cuts by mislaid anchors or submarine sabotage).
Plugging into these major hubs are hundreds of Internet and mobile
service providers, as well as content delivery networks such as Google,
Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Microsoft. If taken out by natural disaster
(earthquake, hurricane) or a strategic attack, much of the United
States, if not much of the world, would have hindered Internet access or
none at all, depending on the severity and sophistication of the
strikes. “It’s crazy to see these unprotected buildings containing
all this physical cabling that’s interconnecting continents as well as
all of North America,” said John Savageau, an information and
communications technology consultant who formerly managed I.X.P.s owned
by the CoreSite Realty Corporation, a major player in the industry. “If
one of these major nodes goes down, you’re going to have pain because
customer performance will be seriously degraded, but if you have a
coordinated attack on multiple locations, that’s a nightmare scenario.”
One Person Dead After Explosion in the Building that Houses Russia’s Largest Supercomputer ~ hehe 1st Putin's bud's r "slip~in" & "bump~in" their heads ? & now "his" cum~puter's is "mal~fuck~in~shin~in" ... folks the "NWO" mafia rats IS go~in at ...it oops
By Melissa Dykes It is being reported in Russian press that a Freon tank exploded at the Russian Academy of Sciences, leaving one person dead. The tank reportedly exploded in the Joint Supercomputer Center (JSCC)
— the building which houses the most powerful supercomputer center in
all of Russia — killing a contractor who was working there. The computer
itself is located underground, while the explosion happened on the 8th
floor in a garage area where a contractor was working. This supercomputer is reportedly not currently under the control of
the RAS, but the Federal Agency for Scientific Organizations — the
Russian government. While initial reports attempt to make this seem like a mere
contractor accident or “technical error,” considering where this
“accident” happened, it seems highly suspicious to say the least. At the
very least, it’s coming at a highly suspicious time.
So many of you sent me this story that I have to comment about
it, because most of you are probably thinking the same thing I am: the
death of the founder of Russia's very popular RT television channel in
Washington DC positively invites our usual high octane speculation: Putin Associate Found Dead in DC Hotel And, in case you're wondering about Lesin himself, there's this: The Dark Past of Putin’s Media Chief So without further ado, let's dive into the high octane speculation.
The death of Mr. Lesin, in Washington DC no less, raises a number of
questions, and occurs at a peculiar time, when suspicions already abound
over the demise of the Russian airliner in Egypt. That sad event itself
occurs in an even wider context of the Russian intervention in Syria,
its evident success (so far) in combatting the Washington-sponsored
ISIS, and in general showing up the American war on terror for the
selective make believe that it is. (Of course, Russia and its Iranian
ally and its ties to Hezbollah also need to be examined, and so far, the
silence from Moscow on that issue has been deafening.) All of that
occurs in the even wider context of the Washington-sponsored and
supported coup in Kiev, the Russian couner-action in the Crimea, and the
ongoing mess in the Donbass in the eastern Ukraine. Lesin's death, in other words, couldn't have occurred in a more
suspicious context. And interestingly enough, Russia appears to
appreciate this problem, as does America, as stories very quickly
appeared in both nations' media that Mr. Lesin had been suffering for a
long time from some unspecified ailment or disease. And it could very
well be the case; but whether the case or not, both countries seem eager
to quash any ideas that his death was anything other than coincidental
and natural. So let's assume for the sake of argument, and our high octane speculation of the day, that it isn't. If not, what might it mean? At one level, it would mean that there has been an escalation on the
ongoing covert warfare by which both countries are now fighting each
other, and that escalation is significant. In many interviews and blogs,
I have been suggesting for a number of years that the "new world order"
- that all encompassing overarching conspiracy that so many people
believe is behind everything - is a Mafia. The family, or
factional, capi may indeed all meet around a table, smoke cigars and
drink brandy, and plot how they're going to dominate the world. But that
doesn't for a moment stop them from shooting at each other if there are
disagreements as to method, timing, or, most importantly, which faction
gets to rule the roost once the end game (world domination) is in
sight. And if Mr. Lesin's death is ultimately determined to be
of a "suspicious nature" or that "foul play is suspected," then what it
may indeed herald is that there is now a full scale shooting war with
prominent members of Mr. Putin's political "family" being in the
crosshairs of American and western "covert ops." That's a shooting war, folks. And if that's the case, then the Russians will shoot back. Not
obviously, of course, but nonetheless the message will be sent:
prominent American advisors or corporate hacks may suddenly drop dead of
heart attacks, have airplane accidents, ski into a tree, and so on. And
as is the case in all such Mafia wars, the targets in each case will
start "low", and work their way up to the more prominent members of each
"family". If Mr. Lesin's death should eventually prove to be
the result of foul play, then the message is "no one is now safe." If
you're a player in the NWO Mafia, you're a potential target in any Mafia
war. So is this reading correct? Well, as noted, Mr. Lesin was apparently
also dealing with some unknown ailment. So the "proof" of this high
octane speculation - that WW3 has now moved into a full scale
Mafia-style shooting war - may have to wait the coming months, and
whether or not there are increasing suspicious deaths, or sudden
resignations and replacements, in various governments. So for now, a death is just a death...
Posts
