Posts
Thursday, March 15, 2012
Secret "Occult Economy" Coming Out of the Shadows?
 |
| Dees Illustration |
Activist Post
During December 2011 and January 2012, I wrote
two articles dealing with the announcement of two different lawsuits
being filed in U.S. District Courts regarding astronomical amounts of
money in the forms of U.S. Bonds, Federal Reserve Notes, foreign
government-issued bonds, and other financial instruments.
The first article, entitled, “Unprecedented Lawsuit Reveals Bizarre Worldwide Banking Connections,”
deals with a lawsuit filed by Neil Keenan, an acting representative of
the Dragon Family of Asia, that contains a list of plaintiffs including
individuals, governments, private institutions, and secret societies
that spans the entire globe. Keenan is alleging that a trillion dollars
worth of Federal Reserve Notes, Kennedy Bonds, and Japanese Government
Bonds were stolen from himself and the Dragon Family by a worldwide
cartel network.
The second article, entitled, “Massive New Lawsuit Filed Against U.S. Federal Government in Bond Theft Scheme,”
deals with a similar situation. In this lawsuit, plaintiff Joseph Riad
alleges that $15 billion worth of Federal Reserve bonds were stolen from
him by similar criminal cartel network involving many agencies of the
U.S. Federal Government such as the Department of Homeland Security and
the Bureau of Public Debt.
In the latter incident, the bonds are supposedly
dated back to 1934. However, the facts surrounding both of these
lawsuits are quite difficult to decipher. With such an interconnected
web of players including very secretive persons and institutions, as
well as historical questions and connotations, it will likely be some
time before the convoluted inter-workings of these incidents are
unraveled -- if indeed they ever are.
Although the bonds are alleged to have been fake, at this time we cannot confirm that this is really the case.
The claim that these bonds are fake, of
course, might very well be true. However, there is also a great deal of
evidence to the contrary.
As I have mentioned in a previous article,
the sheer number of U.S. bonds involved is so large that it presents one
argument against the theory of a rogue counterfeiter. U.S. bonds are
intentionally made incredibly difficult to forge and, considering the
technology required to do so, the odds of such technology residing in
the possession of a rogue network of underground counterfeiters is
highly unlikely. If the bonds had indeed been faked, then it would be
much more reasonable to assume that the counterfeiting operation was
undertaken by a State – the only type of institution that would have had
the infrastructure to oversee such a massive operation.
That being the case, the question would then become “Who?” and, necessarily, “Why?”
Yet, if the bonds were indeed counterfeited, it
also seems that the counterfeiters took the long way around as they were
produced inside sealed boxes thus indicating that the boxes themselves
had been counterfeited. As Madison Ruppert of End The Lie points out:
If these bonds
were indeed forgeries, it implies that the box itself might be fake as
well, which raises the question: why would counterfeiters go through the
effort of not only faking $6 trillion in $1 billion bonds but also go
through the effort of creating a fake Treaty of Versailles Mother Box?
When
I try to imagine the mindset of a thief, I cannot bring myself to
understand why I would counterfeit two things instead of just one, thus
doubling my chances of forgeries being detected.
Furthermore,
why hide the bonds in makeshift compartments within the Mother Box? It
all just makes so little sense I’m not sure what to think at this point.
Of
course, this argument is not concrete enough to prove whether or not
these bonds are real. Indeed, it is important to point out that this
writer is not declaring judgment one way or the other. Clearly, the
situation continues to develop and more information will hopefully come
to light. Whatever one may suspect regarding this issue, it would be
wise not to rush to judgment until a significantly larger amount of
facts emerge.
Regardless,
a suggestion made by many in the “fake bond” camp is that the amount of
money is too great to be real. The argument here is that this much
money simply does not exist within the Federal Reserve/U.S. Treasury
bond system. Furthermore, there are questions as to how so many of these
bonds found their way into Asian hands, particularly those bonds dated
around the 1930s.
It is true that interest has accrued on the
initial value of many of these bonds and financial instruments over
time, particularly those instruments which have been held for a long
period of time. However, many might point that the number of
bonds/instruments that would have been required to be issued in the
first place would have been enormous. Not only that, but there is no
popular record of such massive financial exchanges having taken place
involving the issuing of such instruments as Federal Reserve/U.S.
Treasury bonds. That is, at least transactions that number in the “many
thousands of trillions” of dollars that the Neil Keenan lawsuit alludes
to.
However, one must remember that the world
of banking, particularly privately administered, international,
government-based financial instruments of which the Federal Reserve
specializes in, is not an industry in which transparency is the order of
the day.
After all, it was only recently revealed that the Federal Reserve had loaned a whopping $16 trillion dollars to major banks
as a result of the current American bailout culture. There was no
public announcement of these transactions, and acknowledgement only came
after a watered-down and quite narrow audit provision was passed by
Congress. If massive transactions made by the Federal Reserve such as
the one mentioned above have only recently been uncovered, one is
clearly justified in wondering how many other enormous financial
transactions have taken place in the past between similar institutions?
Indeed, such transactions cannot be considered abnormal in the upper reaches of the international banking cartel.
Nevertheless, some clues have appeared that
might explain the nature of some of the bonds at issue (if they are
real) as well as the reason why the 1930s keep popping up as the birth
year of so many of them.
At this point, I would like to encourage the reader to take a look at David Wilcock’s series FINANCIAL TYRANNY: The Final Sections.
Wilcock has been sounding the alarm on many of these banking issues
such as the stolen bonds and lawsuits for some time and, should his
information pan out, deserves much credit for his work on this issue.
There is a great deal of information collected in Wilcock’s series so
make of it what you will.
One of the questions central to this entire
issue is whether or not these types of bonds have ever been issued in
this first place and, if they have been issued, whether or not they have
been issued in such large quantities. In searching for an answer to
this question, we find ourselves as far away as China and as far back as
the early 1930s.
During the 1930s Chiang Kai-Shek was facing
war on two fronts – from Mao Tse-Tung’s Communist insurgency and from
the Imperial Japanese. As a result, China was incredibly unstable and,
likewise, Chinese gold held by Kai-Shek’s China was in danger of being
seized by one or both of its enemies. In an effort to protect this gold
in the event of a successful push from either of the usurpers, an
arrangement was made for the gold’s safekeeping inside the United States
under the care of the U.S. Federal Government in the form of the
Federal Reserve as well as the BIS (Bank of International Settlements).
This was a plan that was apparently deemed acceptable by both Kai-Shek
and the United States government, although the public was not notified
of its existence.
The CIA, around 1948, played a major role
in the physical removal of much of this gold as Tse-tung marched
successfully through China. As Professor Richard Aldrich of Nottingham
University and co-editor of the Journal Intelligence and National
Security reveals,
the CIA used their cover operation known as the Civilian Air Transport
(CAT) to fly large shipments of Chinese gold to the United States.
But that was in 1948. “What about the 1930s?” you might ask. “Is the 1948 shipment all of the gold brought to the U.S.?”
Evidently not.
 |
| Source |
As David Wilcock states in his article, news reports from The New York Times
give us a glimpse into the gold shipments taking place from China to
the United States in the 1930s. Indeed, Wilcock includes the photo of
six reports published in the newspaper from 1934 to 1938 clearly
indicating the receipt of Chinese gold. Bringing all of these reports
into perspective, he writes;
The last newspaper article we just read, from December 1, 1934, reveals a total excess of $222 million, 385 thousand and 270 dollars' worth of 'imported' gold to the US between 1929 -- when the BIS was officially founded -- and 1934.
At the stated 'new price' of $35 an ounce, this adds up to roughly 6,540,743.23 troy ounces, or 203.43 metric tons of gold.
As
we can see, this process continued well after 1934. Our first article
revealed that $6,120,500 in gold was taken in by the Federal Reserve in a
single day -- on February 19, 1937.
Chiang
Kai-Shek supposedly sent 125,000 metric tons of gold to the US in 1938.
This is obviously much higher than the publicly-reported 203.43 metric
tons that had been taken in from various countries between 1929 and
1934.
However, let's not forget that we now have documented proof that secret gold shipments were conducted from China to the US in 1938.
Japan
intercepted 2.488 metric tons of gold, bound for the Federal Reserve,
on October 24, 1938. It is very likely that many other shipments
occurred and were not intercepted -- just as we have been told -- and
Federal Reserve bonds were issued.
Special attention should be paid to the last statement because the reports that Wilcock produces are only from The New York Times
and most do not mention U.S. receipt of gold as anything other than a
footnote. If we were able to examine all of the leading newspapers
during this time period, or even a more detailed search of The New York Times
itself, there might turn up even more reports of gold shipments. Not
only that, but we certainly can’t count out the fact that many of these
shipments might have been kept secret from the very beginning. If this
is the case, it would stand to reason that there would be no reports
published about them.
Regardless, Wilcock claims that these bonds
were used to create what he calls the “Occult economy,” where loans are
made based on the value of the secret gold stockpiles and transactions
between private individuals and central banks are made in secret.
Not only that, but because “operational
loss” of bonds/notes was to be expected there would necessarily have
been more of the bonds/notes created than the exact number needed by the
Chinese.
Furthermore, as Professor Aldrich states, “Regional
banks receiving FRNs [Federal Reserve Notes] in return for their gold
were aware that the FRNs were likely to be redeemable for only a
proportion of their face value. Therefore a much larger value in FRNs
would have been required than the total value of the gold that the
Americans and Chinese nationalists were trying to extract from China.”
But for all the questions surrounding the
bonds, Federal Reserve Notes and other financial instruments seized or
mentioned in the various lawsuits recently filed, there are documented
instances of fake bonds surfacing in cases very similar to those
mentioned at the start of this article.
For instance, in 2003,*
two men – a Canadian and a Korean living in Japan – tried to use $25
million worth of US Treasury bonds in order to secure a line of credit
from the Imperial Bank of Commerce. The bonds presented by the men were
easily spotted as fake and the men, along with Graham Halksworth – a
69-year-old British man and his associate, Michael Slamaj, a former
Yugoslav spy -- were arrested and charged.
The story behind the acquirement of the
bonds provided by Halksworth and Slamaj directly coincided with the
chronology of events as recorded in the files of the Foreign Office.
Yet, although the bonds/notes in the
Halksworth case were demonstrably false, they did reveal some rather
startling information – that fake bonds were often included amongst
large quantities of real bonds so as to preclude the holder from ever
being able to cash them.
Indeed, when questioned by the police as to
his role in the fake bond scandal, Halksworth responded by telling
police that “Deliberate mistakes were often made in such bonds as a
security device; ask the CIA.” When the police pointed out that the
mistakes were so obvious it looked like a child had made them,
Halksworth responded, “Exactly.”
Halksworth might be in some position to
speak on the matter considering his background. He was a forensic
specialist and a member of the Forensic Science Society who helped
develop a fingerprinting system for Scotland Yard in 1967. He also
worked for a company that provided forensic equipment for many foreign
governments as well as authenticated historical documents for the
Chinese and German governments. He helped issue bonds from both
commercial banks and the Bank of England. He also authenticated and
approved U.S. Federal Reserve bonds for churches, Saudi princes, and
Native American tribes. With a career history such as this, Halksworth
is likely to know whereof he speaks.
In addition, David Wilcock claims that he
has inside information that Halksworth’s assertions are indeed true.
That is, at least his assertions about deliberate mistakes being added
to real bonds and other financial instruments of a high value and
secretive nature. Wilcock claims that his insider explained to him that
for every box of real bonds created, four boxes of fake bonds are
created along with it. According to Wilcock, the source also claims that
even the real boxes contain up to 20 percent fake bonds.
This is designed, Wilcock suggests, in
order to prevent the bonds from ever being cashed and endangering either
the “Occult economy” or the real economy that is now made up of
derivatives and private central banks. If anyone ever comes into
possession of these bonds, they will be “caught” with the forgeries,
arrested, their bonds will be seized, and the Secret Service or other
relevant agency will escape with the real financial instruments.
Unfortunately, at this point, it is still
impossible to make a final judgment about the Riad/Keenan lawsuits,
seized bonds, or even many of the claims made by David Wilcock. However,
by taking a look at each of these cases while keeping in mind the big
picture, it is possible that some light may be shed on the shadowy edges
of international finance and worldwide banking cartels.
Throughout this saga, if the information we have received so far can be believed, we
are approaching great revelation into the tunneled spider web of the
global control system that, up until this point, has remained well
hidden.
*NOTE:
The original article from the UK Independent has apparently been
scrubbed from the Internet. It is, however, preserved in the archives on
Rense.com.
