Orlando Nightclub Shooting: Questions and Anomalies Surround ‘Worst Mass Shooting in U.S. History’ 

by MHB Administrator • Guest Posts • Tags: false flag terror, G4s, Luis Burbano, news media analysis, Omar Seddique Mateen, Orlando mass shooting, terrorism, Vivian Lee, war on terror

By Vivian Lee https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/06/14/orlando-nightclub-shooting-questions-and-anomalies-surround-worst-mass-shooting-in-u-s-history/#more-29321

Scene from the Orlando “shooting,” one of many showing no evidence to support the story. Image: CNN

The “worst mass shooting in U.S. history” is reported to have occurred between 2 am and 5 am on Sunday morning, June 12, at Pulse, a nightclub in Orlando, Florida. The “act of terror” is said to have produced 49 dead and 53 injured. A 50th death was that of the “shooter,” identified as Omar Seddique Mateen, who was employed as a security guard since 2007 by the giant multinational security company G4S. The circumstances of the Orlando “massacre” are suspicious to say the least, with many details fitting into the existing playbook for staged shootings occurring across the U.S.
G4S, the world’s largest security company by revenue, has its US headquarters in Jupiter, Florida, but operates in “more than 100 countries,” with “more than 50,000 employees in the United States.” G4S “has the international reach and resources to meet the security needs of the global age.”[1] The company has expressed its condolences over the tragic event and is cooperating “fully” with the FBI and other agencies who are investigating the “unspeakable tragedy.”

According to Judicial Watch, G4S is involved in a DHS operation to move illegal immigrants (“other than Mexicans”) north across the Mexican border into Arizona, releasing them without proper processing.[2] Perhaps this is the reason that Mateen, reportedly interviewed by the FBI in 2013 and 2014, was able to keep his security clearance and gun permits although he was supposedly under investigation for possible terrorist ties.[3]
But who was Mateen, and did he actually perpetrate “the deadliest terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11”? In light of the many questions and anomalies associated with the event, it seems doubtful that the Orlando “shooting” occurred as presented by the media. Glaring problems include the following:

– By Sunday evening, the “dead” were still supposedly inside the night club – just like the kids reportedly left inside the Sandy Hook school. Did they not take them to the hospital? Where’s the emergency protocol? (CNN)

– News reports claimed that by Sunday evening only a few of the dead had been identified. But doesn’t everyone who frequents a bar carry an ID? By 8 pm Monday the names were in – read tearfully on the air by Anderson Cooper (CNN) and listed in full on Wikipedia.[4]

A “victim” being carried away by non-professionals. Image: CNN

– News footage shows no dead people, or even visibly injured people, no ambulances rushing to the scene, no colored triage tarps, no EMTs swarming the site, or anything else that might prove the “massacre” actually occurred as reported. A few “injured victims” are shown casually walked or carried away from the club, with one dumped into the back of a pickup for transport to the hospital. Such scenes were played over and over on television. As with the Sandy Hook “shooting,” we are supposed to believe the reports, despite the clear lack of evidence. (CNN)

Orlando Shooting - Bullet Sticking out of Victims Leg

– To make up for this lack, we have a parade of witnesses, sobbing without tears and giving unconvincing performances, as seen with many recent false flag events. These include Luis Burbano, who gave interviews to several media outlets soon after the Orlando “shooting.” Like Carlos Arredondo of Boston Marathon fame, Burbano became the face of courage under duress, reportedly removing his shirt to wrap it around a man’s arm and tying another piece of his clothing to a man’s leg.[5]

In his CNN interview, he said he put a “syringe” on the man’s arm – but then corrected this to say it was a tourniquet.[6] Like Arredondo, Burbano is an actor, with several films to his credit.[7]

Professional head shot of actor Luis Burbano, one of many available. Image: m.imdb.com.

– Interviews by assorted officials also sound scripted and strange. These include State Senator Geraldine Thompson, who tells us she is the senator for the district that includes the Pulse night club “in Tallahassee” – although Pulse is actually in Orlando. (CNN)

– Drills were involved, as with many false flag events (more on this subject is sure to come). Oddly, the June 13 online edition of the Orlando Sentinel highlighted an article originally published in 2015, regarding a drill to prepare nurses for mass casualties.[8]

– Almost immediately, fund-raising efforts were underway on behalf of the “victims,” as is familiar from other staged events. Patty Sheehan, Orlando City Commissioner, assures us that there are already people out there raising money. In less than 24 hours, a fundraising page set up for the “victims” had raised $1.3 million, and surely more will roll in.[9]

Orlando Pulse Night Club Shooting Articles Published Day Before

– Also familiar are the online posts that precede the event, documented in Yahoo listings for articles about the Orlando “shooting” that are dated June 11, one day earlier.[10] This was the case for other false flag events, notably the Sandy Hook “shooting.”

– As for “the shooter,” Omar Seddique Mateen (alternately Omar Saddiqui Mateen) was a Florida resident, born in New York, with parents from Afghanistan, who was reportedly anti-gay (according to his father). His family is more than suspicious, with his father, Seddique Mateen, supposedly running for the presidency of Afghanistan, and well acquainted with U.S. Congressmen and officials in the State Department.[11]

Omar Mateen’s father, Seddique Mateen, visiting the U.S. Department of State. Image: http://www.dailymail.co.uk.

– Omar Mateen was supposedly on the FBI’s radar, as already mentioned, but somehow the feds didn’t connect the dots. This is a common trope with all U.S. false flag events, beginning with 9/11. We are supposed to believe that the intelligence behemoth just doesn’t have the capabilities to recognize a terrorist threat, despite more than $50 billion allocated per year to the 16 intel agencies.[12] As with Boston Marathon “bomber,” Tamerlan Tsarnaev, Mateen was known to the authorities, who let him proceed unfettered.
– Mateen wreaked havoc with “at least two guns,” a Sig Sauer AR-15 style assault rifle and a Glock handgun. This fits the weapons profile of other alleged perpetrators of “mass shooting” events, including Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik (San Bernardino) and Adam Lanza (Sandy Hook).[13]

– Most of these “mass killers” have bought their guns legally, obtaining licenses and passing background checks. According to the New York Times article cited above, “at least eight gunmen had criminal histories or documented mental health problems that did not prevent them from obtaining their weapons.” Mateen is no exception, fitting the profile perfectly, exhibiting “mental health problems,” according to his ex-wife, who supposedly had to be rescued from the marriage by her parents.[14]

– Mateen has been judged “self radicalized” and a lone-wolf, home-grown terrorist – by all news sources. This was the case with other “terrorist” actors, including the San Bernardino “shooters.” Marco Rubio went on record to say that homegrown terrorism is the biggest threat our country faces – his fear is that “we’re gonna see more of this.” (CNN) And no doubt we will.

Omar Seddique Mateen, who was inordinately fond of taking selfies. Image: http://www.fnewstoday.com.

– All sources have reported that Mateen called 911 at 20 minutes into the attack and pledged allegiance to ISIS (over the phone) and also mentioned the “Boston bombers” as inspiration. (The tape has not been released.) This is patently ridiculous: did no one in the club think to jump the “killer” as he took time out to make this call? This kind of exhibitionism – serving to identify the perpetrator and associate him/her with the terrorist organization of choice – was seen in the Paris Charlie Hebdo caper, with Amedy Coulibaly calling BFMTV from the kosher Hyper Cacher Supermarket to tell them his name and announce his connection to the Islamic extremist Kouachi brothers .[15]

– Finally, Mateen was conveniently killed by the police (or was he?), with only one officer sustaining a hit – but luckily the bullet was deflected by his Kevlar helmet. This has occurred with virtually all other false flag rampages, a notable exception being the Boston Marathon “bombing,” with Dzhokhar Tsarnaev reported captured and in prison – unless he was actually killed while hiding in the boat.

One can find many other correspondences between the various staged events, with the Orlando “shooting” fitting comfortably into the paradigm. In each case, a saddened President Obama makes a heart-wrenching statement to the press, in some instances seeming to weep. In his words, Orlando was “an act of terror and an act of hate.”[16] But love will prevail – as we are reminded again and again.
Here, as always, the agenda is multi-purpose: gun control, mental health supervision, increased surveillance of the populace, bolstering of the intelligence services, militarization of local law enforcement, further commitment to the “War on Terror” whether abroad or at home, and, in this case, the LGBT program – in a strategy devised by the elites and programmed by the media, with the people used as dupes.
********* Notes
[1] G4S Website, http://www.g4s.us/en-US/
[2] “Orlando Killer Worked for Company Transporting Illegal Immigrants Inside US; Was Interviewed by FBI 3 Times.” ZeroHedge.com, June 12, 2016.  http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-06-12/orlando-shooter- worked-security-company-which-tranports-illegal-immigrants-deep-insi
[3] “Omar Mateen: From Early Promise to F.B.I. Surveillance.” New York Times, June 13, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/13/us/omar-mateen-early-signs-of-promise-then-abuse-and- suspected-terrorist-ties.html
[4] “Orlando Nightclub Shooting.” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Orlando_nightclub_shooting.html
[5] “Last Call at Pulse Nightclub, and Then Shots Rang Out.” New York Times, June 13, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/13/us/last-call-at-orlando-club-and-then-the-shots-rang- out.html
[6] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a18vJYN5Ho0
[7] “Luis Burbano Is an Actor.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMlpKHfnJyg
[8] “Drill Prepares Emergency Nurses for Mass Casualties.” Orlando Sentinel, June 13, 2016 (originally published October 2, 2015). https://memoryholeblog.com/2016/06/13/orlando-mass- casualty-drill/
[9] “These Orlando Shooting Heroes Prove People Are Fundamentally Good.” Washington Post, June 13, 2016. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/inspired-life/wp/2016/06/13/these-are-the-heroes-emerging-from-the-orlando-shooting/
[10] “Orlando Pulse Night Club Shooting Articles Published Day Before.” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDXWA43VP84
[11] “Orlando Shooter’s Father Is Running for President of Afghanistan, Has Backed the Taliban, Hosts Talk Show in California, and Visits the Corridors of Power in DC.” Daily Mail, June 13, 2016. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3637968/Father-America-s-deadly-mass-shooter-wanted-Afghan-president-job-TV-showed-support-Taliban.html
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_intelligence_budget
[13] “How They Got Their Guns.” New York Times, June 12, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/10/03/us/how-mass-shooters-got-their-guns.html?_r=0
[14] “Sitora Yusufiy, Ex-Wife of Orlando Suspect, Describes Abusive Marriage.” New York Times, June 13, 2016. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/sitora-yusufiy-omar-mateen- orlando-shooting.html

[15] “French Police Say Suspect in Attack Evolved from Petty Criminal to Terrorist.” New York Times, January 10, 2015. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/11/world/europe/neighbors-say- suspect-in-french-attacks-and-his-companion-lived-quiet-lives.html

[16] Melanie Garuney, “President Obama on the Tragic Shooting in Orlando,” The White House, June 12, 2016. https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2016/06/12/president-obama-tragic-shooting-orlando

---

Vivian Lee is the nom de plume of a tenured professor at an east coast university.

Hillary's In! 15 Signs Shooting Season Has Officially Resumed With Orlando Nightclub "Event"

Posted by George Freund on June 14, 2016

June 13, 2016

Truth and Art TV article

Contributed by Bernie Suarez

Orlando shooting

Before we talk about what I believe is yet another Gladio-style, Paris-style and San Bernardino-style shooting "event", let me refer to an article I wrote just a few months ago from the time of this article (on March 16, 2016) where I pointed out how the mass media and government conveniently essentially shut down all "mass shootings" and even dramatically slowed down the ISIS worshiping stories in order to focus on the (at the time) important election campaign hype. Well guess what? With CFR's Hillary Clinton now being presented to the general public as the official nominee for President representing the Democratic party the primary election season hoopla just played its course out for now. It (the fake election season distraction hype) can afford to die down for a while. So the first thing that came to mind when I heard about this latest shooting "event" in Orlando, Florida is that with both the Republican and Democrat candidates now chosen, the establishment can afford to resume their Integrated Capstone Events (ICE) and focus the attention of the masses on things like the need for more police, gun control legislation, justification and reinforcement of lockdown, reinforcement of learned helplessness, reminder of possible (super-mobile and versatile) ISIS terrorism extending all the way out to the US to influence support for more war in Syria, and most important the reinforcement of fear so that you won't be able to think critically.

That said, first let me make this very clear. The evidence and oddities I'm about to point to and the points I'm about to make about the recent Orlando nightclub shooting event is not to prove that no one died or that there wasn't really a shooter shooting people; the evidence ultimately points to another planned "event" being presented to the masses entirely in the 2-dimension reality matrix they live in. If you do not know what I'm referring when I say "2-dimensional reality" then please reconcile this meaning first before reading on.

What you are about to see is an entire event presented in a limited manner that involves a scattered number of "witnesses" offering (in this particular case) almost entirely what they "heard" not what they saw. We will also be shown irrelevant and meaningless small video clips that offer nothing to prove the organic full 3-dimensional reality of the event. This 2-dimensional and thus easily controlled reality is the key to understanding not only this most recent "event" at the 'Pulse' nightclub in Orlando, Florida, but it opens your mind to understanding the importance of the omission of the 3-dimensional full organic reality based evidence required to prove any event (think Sandy Hook, Boston bombing etc).

So let's dissect the recent shooting "event" in Orlando one piece at a time as I see it. These points are intended to make you think on your own and encourage you to reject the empty, easily manipulated and controlled 2-dimensional reality you are being asked to believe and demand actual concrete proof and transparency of the full event.

1- No one has stepped up (as of the time of this writing) saying they clearly saw the shooting with their own eyes.

By the time you are reading this perhaps new witnesses will emerge. As of the time of this article it's been well over 12 hours and no one has emerged claiming they actually saw the shooting. Isn't that incredible considering it was a packed nightclub? I know, the dark and noisy excuse can only go so far. Of the oddly very few witnesses, every single witness including the following witnesses say they "heard" gunfire. Emphasis provided for all instances of the word "heard":

a- Jackie Smith - Claims 2 of her friends were shot but so far has not offered any definitive testimony about what she actually saw.

b- Christine Leinonen- Offered comments about how her son is missing but her son's friend survived. No secondhand testimony of any actual eyewitnesses to the shooting.

c- Mina Justice- Offered a story about getting a text message. Nothing confirming any eyewitness concrete account.

d- Jon Alamo- "I heard 20, 40, 50 shots" ... "the music stop"

e- Christopher Hansen said he was in the VIP lounge when he heard gunshots.

f- Club-goer Rob Rick said the shooting started just as "everybody was drinking their last sip." He estimated more than 100 people were still inside when he heard shots, got on the ground and crawled toward a DJ booth.

g- This unknown hat-wearing witness says:

"I didn't see anything ... heard ... loud banging noise"

Oddly, this same witness is seen here at some other point in the evening strangly staring at the camera like he's very aware of the situation. Makes you wonder what he's thinking. Also look at the not-so-distressed man being carried. Does this look odd to you? You decide.

All this aside, how about this. Where are all the cell phone video images of the shooting? Surely everyone in the club had a working cell phone with a video camera, so where are the videos? All of us can easily verify by walking down the street wherever you live and look at how everyone is fascinated nowadays with their smart phone. Seems like a lot of people today just can't put their phones down right? ... Unless there is an active shooter on campus or a mass shooter (Paris style) shooting everyone at a club. Suddenly no one has a smart phone with a camera available. Everyone should be demanding, where is the video proof of this shooting.

2- Non-convincing "rapid fire" video put out to public.

To go along with #1, mainstream media video headline reads: 'Video Captures Sound of Rapid Gunfire During Orlando Nightclub Shooting' - Watch the video for yourself and ask yourself simple questions like:

- Who's shooting these rounds and how does this fit into the story?

- Why does the brief shot of emergency workers show them to be doing nothing specifically related to saving lives? We saw this exact same scenario in San Bernardino, the Navy Yard shooting and many other events where rescue workers are not really seen doing anything important. This is a big deal. More on this later.

3- Medical doctors on TV selling the story and reinforcing hospital "lockdown"!

First of all, it is not the job of a medical doctor to be on TV explaining something so controversial, illegal and destructive to America and the Constitution as "lockdown". Doctors go through years of medical school and training to save lives and live by the Hippocratic Oath, not to get involved in political issues like the selling of lockdown which the controllers are trying desperately to popularize with movies and celebrities. The psychology of lockdown and what it means today is another topic in itself. But the important thing I want everyone to understand is that lockdown is now officially being shifted to the hospital scenario where subjects involved are vulnerable, evidence can be much more easily hidden and fabricated, and medical "authorities" can be propped up on TV "telling" you what happened, while hiding under the guise that actual evidence MUST be withheld due to patient "confidentiality". In other words the hospital scenario is a dream come true for the controllers.

4- Immediate emphasis on "assault rifle" and how this is now the "weapon of choice" for mass shooters

We're seeing an immediate emphasis on the weapon used in the shooting as if that makes a difference. In no time, mainstream media headlines are packing in the stories focusing on the weapon used in order to further take away our rights to bear arms and to further destroy the 2nd amendment, ironically all while the Clinton Foundation, Hillary and Obama have sold weapons to their ISIS-Al Nusra-Syrian rebel terrorist proxy army pals as well as to Saudi Arabia and other nations that sponsor terrorism over the past 8 years.

This is the horribly failed leftist gun control agenda rearing its ugly head as it always does with staged mass shootings. We are all very familiar with this tactic which reminds us all of the Sandy Hook staged event. The idea is to make you forget that under a Constitutional republic where all citizens are armed, you won't see any mass shootings and that "mass shootings" essentially only happen in gun-free zones.

5- We're seeing an immediate agenda to imply "Islamic terrorism".

As we saw in the San Bernardino staged event several months back, this is at least in part, convenient to keep the illegal US occupation in Syria, Iraq and much of the Middle East going under the banner of fighting the US armed and funded ISIS proxy army. Here are several examples.

- Orange County Sheriff Jerry Demings was quick to label this shooting as an "act of terrorism" without any proof whatsoever.

- In a much more bizarre situation we saw Florida Democratic Congressman Alan Grayson suddenly come out and offer very odd and opportunistic statements claiming:

"the police very likely are checking with him and his neighbors, going through his belongings, trying to find if he left any personal statements that would indicate his motive"

Translation? I have no proof of anything but we're digging through to deliver the inevitable up and coming "manifesto" proving intent. After admitting he has no evidence of this he then says:

"it's more likely than not that it was an ideologically motivated attack"

Again after admitting he has no evidence of this, he then says:

"it's no coincidence that the attack took place where it did and when it did"

And if that's not enough, he then reminds us of the modern-day Minority Report style retroactive investigation which he assures us will be conducted to artificially construct the necessary case against the now dead shooter talking about searching deep into "his involvement with social media". Then, regarding the shooters American citizenship- "that is not true of his family members". Then adding "the nationality is indicative" and the upcoming search of "computers", "writings" and "social media". I'm sure they will find plenty of stuff retroactively to "build" their convenient case against the "shooter" which no one seems to be able to describe or even show us the surveillance video of his entry into the club.

And if that's not enough according to mainstream media the FBI is claiming:

The shooter called 911 shortly before the attack and referenced ISIS, FBI agent Ronald Hopper said.

How convenient huh? No proof required, insert ISIS into the story, job done. The ISIS gift to the new world order keeps right on giving!

6- Helicopter view from above shows the same blocked off roads by countless police vehicles that we've seen in previous events

A look at the photos above show clearly the intent to block off the key road to the club just like they did in San Bernardino, Sandy Hook and other staged shootings. Coincidence? You decide. And I won't get into the wild coincident of an officer being "saved" by his Kevlar helmet. A blocked off road is not conducive to lives being saved. In fact it is extremely dangerous and counter-productive to the situation in the same way as blocking the exit of a movie theater would be. Isn't it amazing that with every shooting the main emphasis seems to be to keep the people IN the event not to free them from the event. This tyrannical police state tactic of intimidation has everything to do with "controlling" the environment which allows them to control the information.

7- Emergency workers replaced by police!

See the video I linked in #2 then look at the images below. Do your own research and find me patients being treated by actual licensed medical professionals. In fact (see images below) here we see actual police carrying medically wounded patients. We saw this same gross anomaly in the Navy Yard shooting a few years back where police took on the role of emergency medical personnel at one point even sticking a shot up victim in their squad car.

In Sandy Hook, professional medical personnel became obsolete as the Connecticut police decided if the 26 shot victims were worth exercising life-saving measures on. This is a medical impossibility! This perhaps, as with Sandy Hook, is one of the greatest anomalies here to pay attention to. Police have zero medical background, end of story! And they have no expertise or know-how detecting, handling or manipulating medically injured people. This is the reason people train as paramedics and EMS and these are very challenging fields of training. Police have no clue how to handle or even visually diagnose any kind of injuries and they have no legal right to intervene in especially serious medical injury situations. Police interference with a medical situation can be a very serious open door for major lawsuits to be filed. Don't believe me? Ask any medical doctor what the cost of medical malpractice insurance is nowadays.

However, in the illusional world of staged shootings we're seeing where the sacred practice of medical emergency treatment and life-saving intervention is being magically transferred to the hands of police of all people who are much more known for taking away, not saving lives!

8- The same 3 or 4 shooting "victims" paraded repeatedly on TV and don't look very injured.

Do your own research and watch all the available immediate mainstream media footage and count to see how many differentshooting victims you find. I counted about 3 or 4. I watched quite a few videos and kept running into the same exact footage being repeated over and over again by the mainstream media (see images below). We should be asking then, where are all the shooting victims? And where are the images of the medical professionals doing their job?

9- Missing human frantic and passionate element normally seen in human tragedy.

Missing in all of this is something I certainly can't prove, you'd have to see it for yourself with your minds eye; better yet, it's more like something you feel deep inside of you. Though the mainstream media is "telling" us about the family members and friends balling and crying about their loved ones, I for one have not seen any video of anyone crying genuinely about their lost loved ones. The overall feel at the scene lacks that human intensity you would expect from a gruesome emotional scene like this including the supposedly shot up victims as my image in item #1 and #8 shows.

10- Within hours, immediate supporting stories put out to reinforce initial event.

In just a matter of hours we're now told that a man with "Weapons, explosives arrested, was going to LA Gay pride parade, police say." I'm sure police ARE "saying" this because the timing could not be any more perfect ... or should I say suspicious. You simply cannot make this up. In this story a man is ABOUT to blow things up at a West Hollywood, California gay parade. Ask yourself, what are the odds of this happening at the same time?

11- President Obama immediately comes on TV to announce this is an "act of terror"!

Needless to say, whenever the president gets involved this quickly in an obvious one-side agenda with all the markings of a staged event we should all run the other way. Without any evidence whatsoever Obama immediately seems to know this was an "act of terror". Don't we give police time to do their job and investigate the crime scene any more? How does the president, who has nothing to do with the local Orlando area know so much and so soon?? Keep in mind usually this is where the "manifesto" comes into play but as mentioned above, according to Florida Congressman Grayson there is no proof of a manifesto of intent.

As already mentioned in #5, it is clear that the agenda to make this about "terrorism" and "ISIS" is top priority. This again is a reminder of the tense pre-World War 3 scenario we are currently in and the US wants to beef up their presence in Syria and Iraq in particular (in addition to other countries) so they can support their ISIS proxy army and continue with their PNAC plans and march toward WW3.

12- Presidential candidates immediately come out and endorse event as real

No one should be surprised that Donald Trump is already on record bragging and saying that he was "right" about terrorism. We can expect both Hillary and Donald to jump on this wagon since they both represent the same shadow government that is funding and orchestrating these events using the US Military Industrial Complex which makes billions $ on the fake war on terror.

13- As usual, shooter is dead, doesn't live to tell the story

We've seen this script too many times. The shooter is dead perfectly paving the road for the authorities to tell you what happened without anyone questioning their "story". This is a standard part of the shooting "event" script as many of you know and we're seeing it here again.

14- As mentioned in the intro, mass shootings resume conveniently as soon as Hillary clinched nomination. Timing is everything!

Most truth seekers probably are not aware that in Los Angeles, just a few days ago from the time of this article there was a highly suspicious school shooting at the UCLA campus in Westwood Los Angeles where a professor was shot and killed by a former student. This event involved the usual sequestering of evidence, lack of eyewitnesses, lack of emotion and passion from those involved, the usual "lockdown" of innocent teachers and students and control of the environment, information and evidence. On top of that, literally within days UCLA announced plans to create an "Institute on gun violence" in memory of the professor. Talk about problem reaction solution. As if that's not suspicious enough guess who was in town during this "event"? Hillary herself and the rest of her mafia. Where have we heard these coincidences before? Also, I'm told by a firsthand employee at UCLA that they had been conducting lots of "active shooter drills" leading up to the recent "active shooter" event. Was this very recent shooting at UCLA a sign of things to come? Are these related in terms of the timing?

Was this new Orlando event proof the "pause" I wrote about in March is over? The end of the artificial pause in mass shootings and ISIS terrorism indeed seemed to coincide with Hillary clinching her nomination and I believe this is one of the most telling elements of these recent shooting events we should take notice of which have all happened in a matter of days on or around the time of Hillary's "victory".

15- Divide and conquer as secret society meetings role on in real-time. People were not shot, instead a "Gay Nightclub" was shot up!

Hiding in the psyop of this latest event is something hidden in plain site for everyone to see. The mainstream media knows what they are doing and they know exactly where they are going with these events. Ultimately this is about instilling fear in everyone by using false terror and government propaganda and scaremongering. They want us all to be afraid and they particularly also want us all divided. This is why they tell us specifically that a "gay" nightclub was attacked, then follow up with more "gay" stories. They want and need to make this about "gays" somehow and not about humanity or people, which is who people of gay sexual orientation are. This is equivalent to ISIS beheading "Christians" in Iraq instead of beheading people. The divide and conquer agenda is being pushed on all of us as they hope that (perhaps) conservatives will care less somehow because it was a gay nightclub. They also want the gay community to feel targeted, more withdrawn, perhaps more paranoid. All of this is a psyop on the masses.

You don't have to agree with me but I believe this entire event was staged for political purposes. How they stage their events (using real shooters or not) is not the issue and in fact can be used as a tool to divide us. The most important issue is that everyone realizes we are living in a staged reality.

So as the Bernie Sanders supporters lick their wounds and try to figure out what just happened and how can a known CFR criminal beat out their candidate for nomination to President while the criminal herself is in legal hot water for her obvious crimes, use this moment to wake up to the bigger picture. Realize that Sanders had no chance from the beginning. The entire "I'm with Bernie" hoopla was just a phase outlined in the script the ruling elite cut out for us before the year began. Nothing has changed as far as their plans are concerned even as the latest Bilderberg 2016 meeting takes place as we speak.

Consider that perhaps THIS is the main reason for this shooting event. So that your attention is drawn away from their secret (Bilderberg) meeting where they are likely discussing what new false flag attacks are needed to keep their agenda going. This is unfortunately, the world we now live in and a world we must all wake up to right now.

If you agree please share this message.

http://truthandarttv.com/15-signs-shooting-season-has-officially-resumed-with-orlando-nightclub-event

Media Refusing to Cover Numerous Witness Accounts of Multiple Shooters in Orlando Massacre

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/06/media-refusing-to-cover-numerous-witness-accounts-of-multiple-shooters-in-orlando-massacre.html

June 13, 2016

By Claire Bernish

As mainstream media headlines begin to solidify around the narrative a single shooter was responsible for the carnage at Pulse nightclub in Orlando on Sunday, details calling the now-official story into question must be addressed.
While no doubts can be raised Omar Mateen, indeed, played a role in the attack, eyewitness accounts — while varied and certainly subjective, considering the chaos unfolding at the time — don’t unanimously agree he acted alone.
“I mean, I’m pretty sure it was more than one person,” witness Janiel Gonzalez told a bevy of reporters. “Like I said, I heard two guns going off at the same time,” he continued, gesturing back and forth with his fingers indicating the gunfire emanated from separate directions.

Further, he explained, panicked clubgoers had difficulty locating exits during the shooting, which he estimated lasting eight minutes — plenty of time for the shooter(s) to reload multiple times. When Gonzalez and others finally found a door hidden behind a curtain,

There was probably like 50 people trying to jump over each other just trying to exit the place, and there was a guy holding the door. The guy was holding the door and not letting us exit.

When they asked why he was blocking their only way out — as the shooting seemed to be drawing near — Gonzalez said the man told them, “No, you guys have to stay inside. Stay inside.” Desperate, the group demanded he move to give them safe passage — but the man’s steadfast refusal to do so provoked a serious question.
As Gonzalez explained, the fact there was a semi-automatic rifle, and not a handgun, employed in the shooting, he realized this must be a hate crime — and then he “put two and two together, and I was like, this guy’s trying to prevent us from leaving the club. Maybe they’re working together.”
Fox News’ Megyn Kelly actually interviewed the man, Luis Burbano, who admitted to blocking the exit, asking, “You were holding the doors so that the shooter could not get out, but was there any concern that, you know, you might be keeping the people fleeing the shooter from getting out?”
“Yeah, um … yeah. That was on my mind. There was banging, there was pushing on the door. That was on my mind; but at that point in time, I just tried doing what I thought would be best at that moment,” because, as he explained, the door opened into an alleyway which was extremely narrow and would have created a juggernaut. Burbano also worried he might be opening the door to the shooter, so felt by holding it shut, he would prevent the attacker’s escape.
So, while Burbano’s actions were perhaps motivated by ‘doing the right thing,’ he directly endangered the lives of others trapped inside. Was he working in concert with the attacker or attackers? Probably not. Should he face consequences for blocking one of the only safe means for people to escape an active shooter? Without a doubt.
As for the description possibly more than one shooter had been involved, Gonzalez actually wasn’t alone.
A second witness described in an interview aired on the Today Show, “It had to have been more than one person, too, because [the gunfire] was just too continuous … It’s like you’re at a gun range and all you hear is just, BOOM, bang, bang … I can’t even describe it.”

Follow

TODAY ✔ @TODAYshow

"I don’t think anybody really knew what was going on": Orlando shooting witness describes the scene

8:17 AM - 12 Jun 2016

Shocking Footage from Orlando Pulse Nightclub Mass Shooting

In footage captured by multiple witnesses outside the club, police appear to be engaging in an exchange of gunfire with an unknown subject. Mateen, however, was killed inside the club, according to most accounts.
“They’re shooting back and forth,” the person taping video can be heard saying over a volley of gunfire in the background. “Oh. My. God. They’re all shooting back and forth.”
Could this also lend credence to accounts of multiple attackers?
Yet another eyewitness to the massacre has come forward to describe the events for ABC News’ 20/20 — and his detailed account could be critical. After Mateen collected the hostages’ phones, according to the witness, he called either law enforcement or a news station and said, “America needs to stop bombing ISIS … in Syria.”

“Then he called somebody else that he knew,” the man recalled, “and he mentioned that he was the fourth shooter, and there was [sic] three others, and mentioned, I believe a female name, that was playing dead and she has a bombing vest and he has one, too. And then he said there was three snipers out there waiting for cops to come so the snipers would shoot at the cops.”
And even another witness to the events has described the situation as one of multiple shooters. Noting the sheer number of gun shots ringing out, the witness was asked by Infowars, “So, you believe there was more than one gunman there?”
“I believe that,” the young man replied, “because that’s kind of impossible, to me, for one person with two handguns firing off.” He also described seeing Mateen’s picture on social media, and said the suspect central to the investigation did not appear to have the physical build to employ the two weapons necessary to account for the barrage of gunfire he heard.

Pulse Attack Survivor: There were multiple Gunmen

“He couldn’t manage to fire off two guns,” he surmised.
Decide for yourself, as always, what such accounts — which contradict the now-uniform mainstream narrative — might mean.
But remember, as well, questioning what you’re being spoon fed by the government and corporate media is in no way disrespectful of the victims. Rather, it is out of respect for the dead and injured that appropriate parties be held accountable — and factual accuracy is imperative in order that justice be served appropriately.
Claire Bernish writes for TheFreeThoughtProject.com, where this article first appeared.

Orlando Shooter: Deeper Hidden Ties to the FBI?   ~ hehe over & Over & OVER "this shit" plays OUT the same way ,folks "their" "playbook"  is the fucking same ! WAKE THE FUCK UP ....America ...how many of US is IT gonna ...take ?

http://www.activistpost.com/2016/06/orlando-shooter-ties-to-the-fbi.html

June 14, 2016

By Jon Rappoport
“…Michael German, a former F.B.I. agent who researches national security law at New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, told the Times, ‘They’re [the FBI] manufacturing terrorism cases.’” (The New Yorker, June 10, 2016, “Do FBI Stings help fight against ISIS?” by Evan Osnos)
The website Cryptogon has pieced together some interesting facts, and a quite odd “coincidence.” I’m bolstering their work.
First of all, the Orlando shooter, Omar Mateen, changed his name in 2006. As NBC News notes: “Records also show that he had filed a petition for a name change in 2006 from Omar Mir Seddique to Omar Mir Seddique Mateen.”
Why is that important? Why is his original last name, Seddique, also spelled Siddiqui, significant? Because of a previous terrorism case in Florida, in which the FBI informant’s name was Siddiqui. And because that previous case may have been one of those FBI prop-jobs, where the informant was used to falsely accuse a suspect of a terrorist act. The New Yorker (cited above) has details:

This is not the first time that the F.B.I. has attracted criticism from national-security experts and civil-liberties groups for generating terrorism cases through sting operations and confidential informants. In ‘The Imam’s Curse,’ published in September, I reported on a Florida family that was accused of providing ‘material support’ to terrorists. In that case, a father, Hafiz Khan, and two of his sons were arrested. The charges against the sons were eventually dropped, but Hafiz Khan was convicted and sentenced to twenty-five years in prison. At Khan’s trial, his lawyer, Khurrum Wahid, questioned the reliability of the key [FBI] informant in the case, David Mahmood Siddiqui. Wahid accused Siddiqui, who’d had periods of unemployment, of lying to authorities because his work as a confidential informant was lucrative. For his role in the case, Siddiqui had received a hundred and twenty-six thousand dollars, plus expenses. But in a subsequent interview with the Associated Press, Siddiqui stood by his testimony and motives: ‘I did it for the love of my country, not for money.’

The website Cryptogon, which pieced this whole story together, comments:

What are the odds that an FBI informant in a [previous] Florida terrorist case shares the same last name as the perpetrator of the worst mass shooting in U.S. history—also in Florida—[Omar Mateen] a lone wolf cop poser with multiple acknowledged contacts with the FBI, who was formerly listed on the terrorist watch list and associated with a suicide bomber… while holding a valid security guard license?

Indeed.
And in case you think Siddiqui is a common last name, here is a statement from Mooseroots:

Siddiqui is an uncommon surname in the United States. When the United States Census was taken in 2000, there were about 4,994 individuals with the last name “Siddiqui,” ranking it number 6,281 for all surnames. Historically, the name has been most prevalent in the Southwest, though the name is actually most common in Hawaii. Siddiqui is least common in the southeastern states.

If for some reason the name Siddiqui throws you off, suppose the last name was, let me make something up, Graposco? A few years ago, an FBI informant in Florida, Graposco, appeared to have falsely accused a man of terrorist acts—and in 2016, another Graposco, who changed that last name to something else, killed 50 people in a Florida nightclub shooting—after having been investigated twice by the FBI? Might that coincidence grab your attention?
Again—the 2016 Orlando shooter had extensive contact with the FBI in 2013 and 2014. The FBI investigated him twice and dropped the investigations. The FBI used an informant in a previous Florida case, and that informant had the same last name as the Orlando shooter. It’s quite possible the previous informant was told to give a false statement which incriminated a man for terrorist acts.
You can say this is a coincidence. Maybe it is. But it seems more than odd. Are the two Siddiqui men connected?
Was the Orlando shooter involved in some kind of FBI plan to mount a terror op that was supposed to be stopped before it went ahead, but wasn’t? Was the Orlando shooter “helped” over the edge from having “radical ideas” to committing mass murder?

---

I could cite a number of precedents. Here is one I reported on in 2014:
There seems to be a rule: if a terror attack takes place and the FBI investigates it, things are never what they seem.
Federal attorney Andrew C McCarthy prosecuted the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing case. A review of his book, Willful Blindness, states:

For the first time, McCarthy intimately reveals the real story behind the FBI’s inability to stop the first World Trade Center bombing even though the bureau had an undercover informant in the operation—the jihadists’ supposed bombmaker.
In the first sentence of his hard-hitting account, the author sums up the lawyerly—but staggeringly incomprehensive—reason why the FBI pulled its informant out of the terrorist group even as plans were coming to a head on a major attack:
‘Think of the liability!’
The first rule for government attorneys in counterintelligence in the 1990s was, McCarthy tells us, ‘Avoid accountable failure.’ Thus, when the situation demanded action, the feds copped a CYA posture, the first refuge of the bureaucrat.

That’s a titanic accusation, coming from a former federal prosecutor.
Yes, the FBI had an informant inside the group that was planning the 1993 WTC bombing that eventually, on February 26, killed 6 people and injured 1042.
His name is Emad Salem, a former Egyptian Army officer. Present whereabouts unknown. Yanking Salem out of the group planning the Bombing was a devastating criminal act on the part of the FBI.
But there is more to the story.
On October 28, 1993, Ralph Blumenthal wrote a piece about Emad Salem for the New York Times: “Tapes Depict Proposal to Thwart Bomb Used in Trade Center Blast.” It began:

Law-enforcement officials were told that terrorists were building a bomb that was eventually used to blow up the World Trade Center, and they planned to thwart the plotters by secretly substituting harmless powder for the explosives, an informer [Emad Salem] said after the blast.

Continuing:

The informer was to have helped the plotters build the bomb and supply the fake powder, but the plan was called off by an F.B.I. supervisor who had other ideas about how the informer, Emad A. Salem, should be used, the informer [Emad] said.

The FBI called the “plan” off, but left the planners to their own devices. No “harmless powder.” Instead, real explosives.
The Times article goes on:

The account, which is given in the transcript of hundreds of hours of tape recordings Mr. Salem secretly made of his talks with law-enforcement agents, portrays the authorities as in a far better position than previously known to foil the Feb. 26 bombing of New York City’s tallest towers.

This is a shockingly strong opening for an article in the NY Times. It focuses on the testimony of the informant; it seems to take his side.
Several years after reporter Blumenthal wrote the above piece, I spoke with him and expressed my amazement at the revelations about the FBI—and wondered whether the Times had continued to investigate the scandal.
Blumenthal wasn’t pleased, to say the least. He said I misunderstood the article.
I mentioned the fact that Emad Salem wasn’t called as a prosecution witness in the 1993 WTC Bombing trial.
Of course, why would the Dept. of Justice bring Salem to the stand? Would they want him to blame the FBI for abetting the Bombing?
Again, Blumenthal told me I “didn’t understand.” He became angry and that was the end of the conversation.
I remember thinking: letting the bomb plot go forward…what else do you need for a criminal prosecution of the FBI?
Here is an excerpt from one of those tapes Emad Salem made when he was secretly bugging his own FBI handlers. On this phone call, he talks to his Bureau friend John. Others have claimed this is an agent named John Anticev. The conversation is taking place at some point after the 1993 WTC Bombing. The main topic is Salem’s fees for services rendered as an informant. He apparently wants more money. He also wants to make sure the Bureau will pay him what they’ve agreed to. During the conversation, Salem suddenly talks about the bomb. His English is broken, but his meaning is clear enough. When he finishes, his Bureau handler John just moves on without directly responding.
Salem: “…we was start already building the bomb which is went off in the World Trade Center. It was built by supervising supervision from the Bureau and the DA and we was all informed about it and we know that the bomb start to be built. By who? By your confidential informant. What a wonderful great case!”
According to Salem, there was a bomb, it was built under FBI and “DA” supervision, Salem himself built it, and it exploded.
Questions remain. Did Salem literally mean he built the bomb? Or was he claiming he successfully convinced others to build it? As a provocative agent for the FBI, did Salem foment the whole idea of the WTC attack and entrap those who were eventually convicted of the Bombing? Without his presence, would they have planned and carried out the assault? Was the truck bomb set off under the North Tower the only weapon? Were there other bombs? If so, who planted them?
But the role of the FBI seems to be clear enough. They aided and abetted, and at the very least, permitted the 1993 attack on the Trade Towers.
What about Omar Mateen in 2016, in Orlando?
As the LA Times, reports, the FBI investigated him on two occasions (LA Times, June 13, “Orlando terror attack live updates…”):

While working as a courthouse guard in 2013, Mateen made ‘inflammatory and contradictory’ statements to co-workers about having relatives in Al Qaeda, the radical Sunni terrorist group, [FBI Director] Comey said. Mateen also claimed to be a member of Hezbollah, Lebanon’s Shiite militia, and his remarks drew an 11-month FBI investigation, Comey said. Both groups oppose Islamic State.
Comey said the FBI also briefly investigated Mateen in 2014 for allegedly watching videos by Al Qaeda propagandist Anwar Awlaki and attending the same mosque as an American who would later become a suicide bomber for Al Nusra Front in Syria — another Al Qaeda affiliate opposed to Islamic State.
Both investigations were closed without charges.

Did the FBI just investigate the Orlando shooter? Or did they in some way enlist him in an operation?
Is it merely a terrible mistake that enabled the shooter to work nine years for G4S, the world’s “biggest guarding company” and one of the biggest contractors to the DHS, as Bloomberg News states? Is it merely a terrible mistake that G4S was aware the FBI was investigating the shooter in 2013 and did nothing about it?
Or did some federal group intervene and tell all parties to leave the shooter alone and in place—because he was part of an operation?
(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)
Image Credit: TheFreeThoughtProject.com
The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29^th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his free OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.