http://dunzo.net/r-nightclub-photos/54/?utm_source=rev_nightclub&utm_medium=nightclub&utm_term=social%20and%20trending%20-%20above%20article&utm_content=4028&utm_campaign=rev_nightclub
Subscribe To
Posts
All Comments
Friday, June 26, 2015
Oh shit ... i married her ?
Sometimes you had so much fun at the club, you just gotta take a quick nap in a comfy private place...
http://dunzo.net/r-nightclub-photos/29/?utm_source=rev_nightclub&utm_medium=nightclub&utm_term=social%20and%20trending%20-%20above%20article&utm_content=4028&utm_campaign=rev_nightclubDaddd !!!!! WTF , Shit !
14. Serious Butter Fingers
Source: MakeAGif
Breaking news: Man drops baby and ball on live TV, and no one notices.
Don’t pay attention to the actual interview
happening here. It’s boring. The real blooper beauty is, once again, in
the background.
I’ve heard there’s this unofficial “man
code” that states whenever someone throws a ball at you, you have to
catch it. But if you’re also carrying a baby at the time, I think you
let the ball go in favor of making sure you don’t drop your kid head
first on the ground.
MIT States That Half of All Children May be Autistic by 2025 due to Monsanto
MIT States That Half of All Children May be Autistic by 2025 due to Monsanto ~ just gonna fucking WAIT ..til
"they" turn this Planet into a fucking ...moon ..that the "plan" folks ..til we R all fucking brain dead freak~in ..retards ,that the "plan" Huh ???? we're go~in the WRONG fucking way !!!
A
senior scientist at MIT has declared that we are facing an epidemic of
autism that may result in one half of all children being affected by
autism in ten years.
Dr.
Stephanie Seneff, who made these remarks during a panel presentation in
Groton, MA last week, specifically cites the Monsanto herbicide,
Roundup, as the culprit for the escalating incidence of autism and other
neurological disorders. Roundup, which was introduced in the 1970’s,
contains the chemical glyphosate, which is the focal point for Seneff’s
concerns. Roundup was originally restricted to use on weeds, as
glyphosate kills plants. However, Roundup is now in regular use with
crops. With the coming of GMO’s, plants such as soy and corn were
bioengineered to tolerate glyphosate, and its use dramatically
increased. From 2001 to 2007, glyphosate use doubled, reaching 180 to
185 million pounds in the U.S. alone in 2007.
If
you don’t consume corn- on- the -cob or toasted soybeans, however, you
are hardly exempt from the potential affects of consuming glyphosate.
Wheat is now sprayed with Roundup right before it is harvested, making
any consumption of non- organic wheat bread a sure source for the
chemical. In addition, any products containing corn syrup, such as soft
drinks, are also carrying a payload of glyphosate.
According
to studies cited by Seneff, glyphosate engages “gut bacteria” in a
process known as the shikimate pathway. This enables the chemical to
interfere with the biochemistry of bacteria in our GI tract, resulting
in the depletion of essential amino acids .
Monsanto has maintained that glyphosate
is safe for human consumption, as humans do not have the shikimate
pathway. Bacteria, however, does—including the flora that constitutes
“gut bacteria.”
It
is this ability to affect gut bacteria that Seneff claims is the link
which allows the chemical to get on board and wreak further damage. The
connection between intestinal flora and neurological functioning is an
ongoing topic of research. According to a number of studies, glyphosate
depletes the amino acids tyrosine, tryptophan, and phenylalanine, which
can then contribute to obesity, depression, autism, inflammatory bowel
disease, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Monsanto
disagrees. The food and chemical giant has constructed a webpage with
links to scientific studies pronouncing the safety of glyphosate.
Other science writers have also taken up
the Monsanto banner, scoffing at the scientific studies that prompted
Seneff to make her claims. “They made it up!” pronounced Huffpost
science writer Tamar Haspel, in an article thin on analysis but heavy on
declarative prose.
Others,
such as Skeptoid writer and PhD physicist Eric Hall, take a more
measured approach, and instead focus on the studies which prompted the
glyphosate concerns. According to Hall, Seneff is making an error known
as the “correlation/causation error,” in which causality is inaccurately
concluded when there exists only the fact that two separate items—in
this case, the increased use of glyphosate and the increased incidence
of autism—may be observed but are not, in fact, directly related.
Seneff’s
pronouncements focus specifically on the glyphosate issue. As we know,
there are other potential tributaries which may be feeding the rise in
autism and also causing age-related neurological conditions, such as
Alzheimer’s. These may include contents of vaccines, aluminum cooking
ware as well as other potential sources for chemical consumption.
Some
individuals, such as M.D. and radio host Rima Laibow have speculated on
the intentionality behind this ostensible chemical siege against our
gray matter. Laibow believes that the impetus may be to create an entire
class of autistic individuals who will be suited only for certain types
of work.
This
harks back, eerily, to Aldous Huxley’s classic Brave New World, in
which individuals were preprogrammed from “conception” for eventual
placement in one of five groups, designated as Alpha, Beta, and so on
down to Epsilon, based on their programmed brain power. In Huxley’s
dystopian world, this class delineation by intellectual ability enabled
society to function more smoothly.
Whatever
may driving the autistic/Alzheimer’s diesel train, one thing is for
certain: the spectre of half of our children coming into the world with
significant brain damage constitutes a massive and undeniable wound to
humanity. The rate of autism has skyrocketed from roughly one in every
two thousand in the 1970’s to the current rate of one in every sixty
eight. Alzheimer’s has become almost universal in the elderly. Seneff’s
predictions can only be ignored at grave risk to the human race.
Janet C. Phelan,
investigative journalist and human rights defender that has traveled
pretty extensively over the Asian region, an author of a tell-all book EXILE, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook
First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2015/01/26/mit-states-that-half-of-all-children-may-be-autistic-by-2025/
First appeared: http://journal-neo.org/2015/01/26/mit-states-that-half-of-all-children-may-be-autistic-by-2025/
MIB Are NOT From “The Government”
MIB Are NOT From “The Government”
As someone who has written extensively on the mystery of the Men in Black, I know for sure that many people within Ufology take the view that the MIB are agents of some arm of government. That’s to say, dark-suited figures whose job it is to intimidate and terrorize witnesses to UFOs. But, in reality, there is very little evidence to suggest that the majority of the MIB are from any government. Yes, there are exceptions. They are, however, most definitely in the minority. The truth is that government agencies are as baffled as we are.John Keel was not only the author of the acclaimed book, The Mothman Prophecies. He was also someone who dug very deeply into the matter of the MIB, who they were, and where they came from. In February 1967, Keel had the opportunity to speak with Colonel George P. Freeman. Colonel Freeman, of the U.S. Air Force, made the following, written statement about the MIB. Keel took careful note of it:
“Mysterious men dressed in Air Force uniforms or bearing impressive credentials from government agencies have been silencing UFO witnesses. We have checked a number of these cases, and these men are not connected to the Air Force in any way. We haven’t been able to find out anything about these men. By posing as Air Force officers and government agents, they are committing a Federal offense. We would sure like to catch one – unfortunately the trail is always too cold by the time we hear about these cases, but we are still trying.”
John Keel
“Information, not verifiable, has reached Hq USAF that persons claiming to represent the Air Force or other Defense establishments have contacted citizens who have sighted unidentified flying objects. In one reported case, an individual in civilian clothes, who represented himself as a member of NORAD, demanded and received photos belonging to a private citizen.”
The document continues: “In another, a person in an Air Force uniform approached local police and other citizens who had sighted a UFO, assembled them in a school room and told them that they did not see what they thought they saw and that they should not talk to anyone about the sighting. All military and civilian personnel and particularly information officers and UFO investigating officers who hear of such reports should immediately notify their local OSI offices.”
Moving on to the FBI…
In 1956, Gray Barker wrote and published a book titled They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers. A significant percentage of the book was focused on the MIB-themed experiences of Albert Bender, who, in the early 1950s, established the International Flying Saucer Bureau (in Bridgeport, Connecticut). It wasn’t long before the IFSB was no more. Bender supposedly closed it down after receiving repeated, menacing visits from the Men in Black.
Bender’s MIB were far less like 1950s-era G-Men or agents of the CIA. They were far more like something from the pages of a Bram Stoker novel, mixed in with a greater than liberal sprinkling of H.P Lovecraft. As a result of the publication of Barker’s book, a number of people contacted the FBI, demanding to know who the dark-suited silencers really were – and particularly because certain ufologists, such as Barker, were claiming the MIB were from “the government.”
The FBI has declassified some of its documents on Bender and Barker, and which demonstrate something notable. On January 22, 1959, none other than J. Edgar Hoover instructed the Chicago office of the FBI: “The Bureau desires to obtain a copy of the book written by Gray Barker entitled ‘They Knew Too Much About Flying Saucers.'” Records demonstrate that, behind closed doors and after reading Barker’s book, the FBI was as baffled in the fifties as the Air Force was, almost a decade later.
Now, I know some ufologists will claim that the USAF and the FBI were both out of the loop – due to the MIB originating with a deeply buried, “black budget”-type group that even Hoover and the Air Force couldn’t uncover. But, I disagree. Every bit of data that has surfaced from government agencies suggests they are as utterly mystified as the field of Ufology is, when it comes to the nature and origin of the Men in Black.
Yes, the MIB phenomenon is real. but it has practically nothing to do with agencies of government, of the military, or of the intelligence community. The Men in Black are…something else.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)