Wednesday, March 20, 2013



Exclusive Interview w/ Marvel’s Kevin Feige & #IronMan3 Trailer Sneak Peek #DisneyOzEvent

IRON MAN 3

If you had told me a few years ago that I’d be crazy about super hero movies, I’d probably well have, told you that you were crazy. That was before this mom got introduced to a whole new genre of superheros from Marvel. I fell in love with the Iron Man movies and Captain America, and had an amazing opportunity last April to travel to a special premier of Marvel’s The Avengers at the Tribeca Film Festival in NYC and interview stars from the film.

A few weeks ago when I was I was in Los Angeles for a blogger event for another film I had a top secret superhero opportunity that I wasn’t allowed to talk about until now. Marvel’s President Kevin Feige was available to give myself and a few of my blogging buddies a special sneak peek of the new Iron Man 3 and to also to talk to us about the film and Marvel’s role in family entertainment.

A special movie trailer just became available on Iron Man 3 this morning and we also have it here for you too! Here’s the clip below:


And here is our interview with Marvel’s Kevin Feige.


On Tony Stark & Iron Man 3
Coming off the heels of Avengers, we wanted to focus on Tony.  Seeing him with the Hulk and Thor, obviously was awesome and was our big event last Summer.  This time we wanted to return to Tony’s world.  His place in Malibu, which is why you see him with Pepper.  And we wanted to remind the audience, yes the suits are cool, but it’s his intellect that is really his super power. You’ll remember the beginning of Iron Man 1, he’s in a cave.  He doesn’t have access to anything, and he ends up building his first Iron Man suit.  So what we wanted to do in this movie was put him in a similar position.  Take away everything from Tony and see how he can fight the villain back.  He’s been to outer space, he’s seen aliens, he’s seen green people, he’s seen guys with hammers, and he’s just a guy.  So it sometimes worries him and he thinks maybe I’m only super if I’m in the suit.  This movie is the movie that reminds him he’s super, even out of his suit.  He just has to sort of figure that out.

Happy Hogan is again played by Jon Favreau, who is one of Tony Stark’s best friends.  Is hurt, seemingly an attack by the new villain as Mandarin, a terrorist in this world.  And he’s going to investigate who this terrorist is and where he can find him.  And it leads him to a place Tony’s never been in any of the movies, which is the middle of the good old US of A.  He’s in small town, Rose Hill, Tennessee.  And he meets a boy.

But we really wanted him to be fighting for his friends, for the love of his life, Pepper, who wants to see him as something that he’s not.  He’s comfortable in the Penthouses of Manhattan, in mansions in Malibu.  Here he is in the middle of Tennessee with his hat pulled low and he’s trying to do this investigation.  And this very sweet and funny relationship that he begins with  this little boy.  Again, reminding the audience he’s a superhero, he’s frankly our most famous superhero, all because he’s got a very intelligent, scientific mind.

On the Addition of a Child to Iron Man 3
That little kid is named Tyson.  We  had this idea to team him up with a little kid for a section of the movie.  And it was a little bit scary. So we auditioned lots and lots of kids and Tyson came in and was just a real kid.  He could barely keep a straight face looking at Robert. He bonded with Robert completely and we decided,  to cast him.  I called Robert, I said, I think he’s the best kid, I’m going to cast him.  He said, let me call him.  So I called his mom, and I said what time does he get out of school and what’s his cell phone?  And when he came out of school, his cell phone rang and it was Robert Downey, Jr. calling saying, you’re going to be in Iron Man 3.  And so it continued like that for the rest of the production.  It was really great and they formed a nice bond.

And it is a fun bond.  Tony does not treat him like a kid necessarily.  He goes on in this scene and he doesn’t, you know, pat him on the head and treat him like a little boy necessarily.  Which I think little boys like when adults don’t treat them like that.  We’ve screened it for a few audiences just in a normal test screening, and this relationship is ranked as one of the most surprising, and unique, and new things about the movie.  Which was exciting because it was one of the scary things. We’ve never done…we never really had a kid that, a little kid that had that big a part in any of our films. So that was exciting.


On Marvel’s Partnership With Disney
Well, I’ll tell you a few things.  One is, I’m obsessed with Disney and with Disney theme parks, and when I was first told by the heads of Marvel, what do you think of Disney?  We’re thinking of selling the company.  I pulled out my wallet, I got the annual pass, the Disney DVC membership, all of that stuff, because I was just obsessed with it.  That’s what my family did, was go to the Disney theme parks every year.  And still do, over New Years down in Florida.
So I sort of loved that, and I thought it was great.  I understood why they wanted us, because they didn’t necessarily have things for boys and for that market.  And they were very great in early meetings we had with them.  They said we want you to keep doing what you’re doing.  And that was, I don’t know, two years ago now.  Two or three years ago.  And that has that has certainly held true.  They’ve let us make the movies we want to make the way we make them.

The best thing, and Avengers is the perfect example of it, is what they can tap into.  All of the marketing that they bring to it.  The passion that they bring to it.  They did a spectacular job marketing the Avengers.  And tapping into everything that a company as huge as Disney can do.  But at the same time, what I love most about them is, despite it being the biggest entertainment conglomerate on earth, I think it is, it’s Disney and it can be very personal.

And as we get into more of the parks and things like that, I want kids to be able to come experience Marvel the way I would go experience the Disney parks and still do.  So it’s been, I mean it’s been very positive in the fact that we have a home now.  It is clearly, a family here with Disney and they put everything into it when the movie comes out.

CA-17743_R_C2

On the PG-13 Rating for Iron Man 3…
I know parents who take their four year olds, and I know parents who won’t let their kids see them until they’re thirteen.  So that really, it all, you know, depends on that.  For us, there are things you can do if you are going by the letter of the law in a PG-13 movie.  There’s a level of violence you can add, there’s a level of sexuality you can have, there’s a level of language you can have.  We never go anywhere near that, top of that.  Because we don’t want to.  Because that’s not what our characters are about.

When you have the amount of fighting and explosions and some blood on his nose when he puts the suit on, we do want that.  We want it to be real.  Otherwise it’s just a CG thing hitting a CG person.  So that’s why we’re always in that PG-13 range.  But we want, you know, Jon Favreau on the first two, movies, Joss Whedon on the Avengers, myself, we have kids.  We want to be able to take our kids to these movies, um, and to enjoy them.  It’s really the level of intensity that determines, you know, whether parents are comfortable taking their kids to it as opposed to content, necessarily.

And in terms of the marketing of this movie, if you go back and look at the marketing of Avengers.it promises a much darker important movie than the movie actually is.  The movie is much more fun than the- than the trailer would show.  Same thing with this.  This trailer is, he’s being blown apart, his life is at stake, how will he get out of it?  The movie is much, much funner.  Much more fun than that, but that’s what gets people into the audience.  Is he gonna get killed? I gotta go see this.  What’s gonna happen?  Thank goodness, that’s what we want.

On the Marvel Legacy and How it Touches Different Generations
In terms of what differentiates it, I mean I do think that- that there’s a legacy with Marvel, and there’s a history with Marvel.  And you have grandparents and parents and kids and little kids that know them whether they read them, you know…  I’ve met, um, people that are eighty years old, ninety years old, that talk about reading a Captain American comic in the…I don’t know if they were actually in the trenches, but somewhere at some point in World War II.  And I had a three year old, a nephew, and I have a four year old daughter who asked me all about Iron Man.

Does he fly?  Is he a robot?  What is it?  Because of the toys.  Or because of the pajamas, or because of the shoes. I love that about Marvel.  I love that it can stay cool and relevant from a two year old to a twelve year old to a twenty-two year old to a ninety-two year old.  That’s important to us.  How do we it differently?  I can’t really tell you, other than to say, we always just focus on the character.  It always starts with, what do want this character to go through?  What mission do we want the character…?

What emotional sort of depth and growth do we want him to go through?  Then we think of all the cool stuff to- to put him through, as opposed to, oh I always wanted to see Iron Man’s house fall into the sea.  We don’t start there.  We start with, what is the- what is the character journey we want to take him on?  And we really do.  We call him Tony Stark, not Iron Man.  When we’re just in our own meetings, we refer to Captain America as Steve.  We refer to Thor as Thor.  We refer to Hulk as Bruce.  Because these are, you know, real people that we want to continue to flush out movie to movie to movie.

CA-05559_R

On Attracting a Female Audience to Marvel
Well, I mean we want these movies to play for everyone.  We think they are for everyone.  And I don’t know that we necessarily sit down and go, how do we make men like this movie?  How do we make women like this movie?  We don’t do that.  Part of what we love about our characters is they, they’re human, they’re flawed.  They react even with aliens coming at them and armored suits flying at them and villains shooting rays at them.  The way they respond to those situations, we try to make it as emotionally truthful as possible.

So we want the most fantastic thing to be the outer space elements of Avengers.  The advanced technology of Iron Man.  Let that be the comic book element.  But the human interaction should be real.  It should be as real as possible.  Um, and I think that appeals to people who might not just love the explosions and the loud noises and the clacking and the repulsing.  And in this franchise in particular, and it’s sort of unique, frankly.  This is now the fourth movie, um, if you count Avengers with Iron Man.

And he’s been with the same woman the whole time, and the relationship just grows.  And the relationship gets deeper and deeper.  And in this film they live together.  And, you saw a little bit of the banter with Rebecca Hall who plays a new character, Maya.  But the truth of the matter is, the love triangle in this movie is really between Tony, Pepper and the suits.  Tony, Pepper and his obsession with those suits, and the obsession with technology.  And it’s sort of unique for a big superhero summer blockbuster franchise to have, I think, that kind of layers.

On Marvel’s Characters Setting Positive Male Role Models with Women
Well, Pepper, was always the most important relationship to Tony Stark in the comics.  That’s not always true I guess Clark Kent has Lois Lane, right?  That said.  A lot of the other characters don’t have that.  The Marvel characters sort of do.  Thor has the Natalie Portman character who continues into the next Thor film.  So we do, you know, pull it all from the comics and that is what, what it was.  It really was fun to us in the beginning of Iron Man 1.

He goes to Vegas, he sleeps with a reporter, to sort of set up that, so that the relationship with Pepper, there’s a flashback at the beginning of this movie with the Rebecca Hall character that shows what he was like many years ago, before he became Iron Man.  And you see a little bit of that playboy.  But the fact is, you always want to remind audiences of that side of him, so you can appreciate how, sort of mature he’s getting.  That he’s putting all that aside to be with her.  The other thing is, the chemistry between Robert and Gwyneth is spectacular.

And, we just want to keep it with each movie we go, do we want to bring her back?  Yes, of course. Because it’s just so strong.  Yknow, the marketing to Avengers, you may remember the big line, uh, Steve Rogers, Captain America says, you know, without a suit of armor what are you?  And he says, billionaire playboy, philanthropist, whatever, and even Robert would go, I’m not really a playboy anymore.  And I’d say, the line’s good, it’s okay.  It’s fun.  Uh, uh, but even he was like, I’m not really a playboy.  And he’s not.

And even in Avengers, you can tell how close he is with Pepper and that, in those few scenes together.  And when he’s flying up to save the- save the planet, he calls her.  That’s the one call.  So we just love, frankly, that it’s unique in these kind of movies.  We think it’s a, you know, an important relationship between them.


On Pepper taking on a bigger role in the suit….
I will tell you this.  In this movie we, we play with the convention of the damsel in distress.  We are bored by the damsel in distress.  But, somet imeswe need our hero to be desperate enough in fighting for something other than just his own life.  So, there is fun to be had with, is Pepper in danger or is Pepper the savior?  Uh, over the course of this movie.

In terms of where we go with future movies, we’ll see.  In the comic books she does get a taste for the suit and becomes her own hero named Rescue, who doesn’t necessarily battle other people, but  is on missions to help people and to save people.  Will we do that down the line with Gwyneth Paltrow?  Who knows.  But it’s certainly something…her being in the suit is something we have been playing with since Iron Man 2.  We did some designs and it didn’t end up fitting in that movie.  But the little taste you saw here is something that we’re certainly interested in.

image002 (9)

On the Ending of Iron Man 3
….We have what I think is the biggest, you know, most action packed finale we’ve had. I showed the film to Joss Whedon who is our writer-director of Avengers, is currently working on Avengers 2, and he saw the finale of this and he goes, now what am I supposed to do now?  What am I going to do in Avengers 2?

Disclosure: I attended a blogger event for purposes of covering this movie and other Disney films. However all opinions expressed are my own. Our family loves Iron Man and from the previews I saw this is a 2013 film you won’t want to miss!

The Art of Asking Why We Hate Amanda Palmer

Disclosure: I have a prior professional relationship with Amanda Palmer as an editor for her graphic novel Evelyn, Evelyn.
Amanda Palmer is easy to hate. She’s loud. She’s demanding — and her rise to increased public visibility has come largely care of her willingness to treat the world as part piggy bank, part personal assistant. She stonewalls in the face of criticism. She’s got a large, vocal, and aggressively evangelistic fanbase; she’s one of those polarizing public figures it’s hard to casually enjoy or dislike.
Palmer has spent the last few years ascendant. Half of the cult-favorite punk-cabaret duo the Dresden Dolls, Palmer recently split with her label and launched a crowdfunded solo career. It should come as no surprise that she’s a die-hard Kickstarter evangelist: Her first campaign sought $100,000 and raised $1.2 million, and since then, she’s been singing the praises of crowdfunding as a new populist paradigm for art, most recently in a widely publicized TED talk called “The Art of Asking.”
Criticism of Amanda Palmer flies fierce and fast online. Some of it is related to her shocking ignorance of the class politics and context of her so-called crowdfunding revolution. Critics cringe, too, at her sheer volume; her acting out in public; her unapologetic attention-seeking. And again and again, they call her out for her entitlement – to attention, to a platform, to funding, to favors.
It gets personal quickly: because accessibility and connection with her audience are big parts of Palmer’s routine; because her public identity is itself aggressively personal.
This is not a defense of Amanda Palmer as a public figure; of the willful class and context-blindness of her recent TED talk; of her practice of shaking one fist at an exploitative record industry while beckoning musicians to work for “hugs and booze” with the other. This is not a plea to let her off the hook or release her from accountability.
But when we criticize Amanda Palmer, I think we need to take a long, hard look at exactly what we’re reacting to — and why.
In a media landscape that typically reduces women to paragons or villains with strikingly little middle ground, Palmer is a self-styled anti-hero, from her feuds with the record industry to her Wicked Queen eyebrows. And it’s worth noting that the actions for which Palmer is attacked most often and most harshly tend to be the ones that conflict with what public femininity is supposed to look like — behaviors and traits that would often sit differently on the shoulders of a male performer.
After all, women are supposed to be nice. They’re supposed to accept what’s offered them and do it with a smile, and the backlash when they ask for more is swift and quantifiable. Or, it’s acceptable only when they’re sufficiently feminine and apologetic about it, as if their achievements can only be measured against a backdrop of personal passivity. It’s an insidious catch-22 for women, in which any success directly and aggressively sought is treated as fundamentally unearned. We excoriate a performer for courting attention; but if attention is one of the best measures of her professional success, why shouldn’t she be chasing it for all it’s worth?
Few critics fail to latch on to Palmer’s marriage to literary luminary Neil Gaiman, pointing out that she’s married into an audience much larger than the one she commands on her own, with the additional sting of implication that she’s earned her share of their joint following at best by canny alliance — or, at worst, on her back. That the same critics forget that Gaiman and Palmer’s relationship began as — and continues to include — creative collaboration is only marginally relevant; what’s more troubling is how quickly they fall into the pattern of attributing a woman’s professional success to the nearest well-connected man.
If we’re going to drag Gaiman into this, let it be as an illustration of just how profound a double standard we apply to Palmer. Look at the strength and volume of the vitriol directed at Palmer: how consistently (and, to some extent, justly) she’s been raked over the coals for her oversteps, particularly those that involve soliciting free work from artists and performers.
Contrast this with the popular reception of Gaiman’s current crowdsourced project, an ad campaign for BlackBerry. The website Bleeding Cool applauds Gaiman’s creative use of “teamwork” (mentioning in the same breath that he’s likely being paid “the GDP of a small Eastern European nation”) and the amazing opportunity he and BlackBerry have provided for the author’s legion of fans to produce work in nominal collaboration with their favorite storyteller — for free. Other coverage has likewise focused on the opportunity Gaiman’s offering his fans. Issues with ownership of the work those fans create for free surfaced briefly, before dissipating just as quickly.
But can you imagine the response, were Palmer to enter into a similar deal? The accusations of exploitation, attention-grabbing, entitlement? The cries of scandal?
Should Palmer be held accountable for her actual transgressions? Hell, yes. But please, check your double standards at the door.

In Spain, The Bitcoin Run Has Started

Tyler Durden's picture

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-20/spain-bitcoin-run-has-started


Something extreme is happening in Europe. Since Sunday, Bloomberg Businessweek reports a trio of Bitcoin apps have soared up Spain's download charts, coinciding with news that cash-strapped Cyprus was planning to raid domestic savings accounts to pay off a $13 billion bailout tab. “This is an entirely predictable and rational outcome for what’s happening in Cyprus,” says ConvergEx's Nick Colas. "If you want to get a good sense of the stress European savers are feeling, just watch Bitcoin prices."
The value of the virtual currency has soared almost 30 percent in the last two days. "One hundred percent of that is due to Cyprus," says Colas. "It means the Europeans are getting involved." As German economist Peter Bofinger warned in an interview with Spiegel Online: "European citizens must now fear for their money."
The same apps download data, however, showed that Italians aren’t ready to abandon commercial banking, remarkable as many Italians still recall that black day in 1992 when they woke up to a levy on their savings accounts to prop up the nation’s teetering finances.

The EUR price for a Bitcoin has jumped from around EUR37 to over EUR50 in the last two days as reality hits... and look at the volume...


Nassim Taleb (On Reddit) - via Mike Krieger (@LibertyBlitz):
"Bitcoin is the beginning of something great: a currency without government, something necessary and imperative."
Chart: Bitcoincharts

Rick Ross Was Strapped During Vehicle Ambush

Despite lack of handgun license, rapper was carrying loaded 9mm

Rick Ross

View Document

Rick Ross Gun Report

  • Rick Ross Gun Report
MARCH 20--The rapper Rick Ross had a loaded 9mm handgun in the waistband of his pants when the Rolls Royce he was driving was recently fired upon on a Florida street, The Smoking Gun has learned.
The 37-year-old performer (real name: William Leonard Roberts) was carrying the Smith & Wesson semi-automatic despite having a suspended handgun permit, according to a Fort Lauderdale Police Department report (which was released today after TSG filed an open records request with cops).
It is unclear whether Ross will face a weapons possession charge in connection with the January 28 incident. The “black and chrome” gun seized from the rapper contained 12 live rounds, with one in the chamber and 11 in the magazine, cops noted.
Ross did not attempt to hide the 9mm. Instead, he “freely advised Officers that he had a firearm on his person,” investigators reported.
Cops interviewed Ross shortly after he crashed his vehicle while trying to elude gunfire directed at him. “Fearing for his safety,” Ross accelerated the 2011 Rolls Royce and made a sudden right turn, losing control of the vehicle in the process. Ross, who was traveling with his girlfriend, Shateria Moragne-El, had celebrated his birthday earlier that evening.
While neither Ross nor Moragne-El could provide police with any information “regarding the incident or suspects,” two witnesses in another car told police that an “older model BMW 4 door” pulled up to Ross’s car at an intersection and the occupants of the BMW opened fire on the silver Rolls. The witnesses reported that the BMW had “3 possibly 4 black male occupants.”
Though “multiple spent casings” were recovered by the forensic unit, it does not appear as if Ross’s car was struck by a bullet (though several local businesses were hit by stray gunfire). Nobody, however, was injured during the 5 AM gunplay.
The Fort Lauderdale shooting came in the wake of several death threats directed at Ross by members of the Gangster Disciples, who became angered over the rapper’s purported slights towards the gang and one of its co-founders. In response to the threats, Ross canceled a series of concerts late last year. (3 pages)

Why Is The World Economy Doomed? The Global Financial Pyramid Scheme By The Numbers

Why Is The World Economy Doomed? The Global Financial Pyramid Scheme By The NumbersWhy is the global economy in so much trouble?  How can so many people be so absolutely certain that the world financial system is going to crash?  Well, the truth is that when you take a look at the cold, hard numbers it is not difficult to see why the global financial pyramid scheme is destined to fail.  In the United States today, there is approximately 56 trillion dollars of total debt in our financial system, but there is only about 9 trillion dollars in our bank accounts.  So you could take every single penny out of the banks, multiply it by six, and you still would not have enough money to pay off all of our debts.  Overall, there is about 190 trillion dollars of total debt on the planet.  But global GDP is only about 70 trillion dollars.  And the total notional value of all derivatives around the globe is somewhere between 600 trillion and 1500 trillion dollars.  So we have a gigantic problem on our hands.  The global financial system is a very shaky house of cards that has been constructed on a foundation of debt, leverage and incredibly risky derivatives.  We are living in the greatest financial bubble in world history, and it isn't going to take much to topple the entire thing.  And when it falls, it is going to be the largest financial disaster in the history of the planet.
The global financial system is more interconnected today than ever before, and a crisis at one major bank or in one area of the world can spread at lightning speed.  As I wrote about yesterday, the entire European banking system is leveraged 26 to 1 at this point.  A decline in asset values of just 4 percent would totally wipe out the equity of many of those banks, and once a financial panic begins we could potentially see major financial institutions start to go down like dominoes.
We got a small taste of what that is like back in 2008, and it is inevitable that it will happen again.
Anyone that would tell you that the current global financial system is sustainable does not know what they are talking about.  Just look at the numbers that I have posted below.
The following is the global financial pyramid scheme by the numbers...
-$9,283,000,000,000 - The total amount of all bank deposits in the United States.  The FDIC has just 25 billion dollars in the deposit insurance fund that is supposed to "guarantee" those deposits.  In other words, the ratio of total bank deposits to insurance fund money is more than 371 to 1.
-$10,012,800,000,000 - The total amount of mortgage debt in the United States.  As you can see, you could take every penny out of every bank account in America and it still would not cover it.
-$10,409,500,000,000 - The M2 money supply in the United States.  This is probably the most commonly used measure of the total amount of money in the U.S. economy.
-$15,094,000,000,000 - U.S. GDP.  It is a measure of all economic activity in the United States for a single year.
-$16,749,269,587,407.53 - The size of the U.S. national debt.  It has grown by more than 10 trillion dollars over the past ten years.
-$32,000,000,000,000 - The total amount of money that the global elite have stashed in offshore banks (that we know about).
-$50,230,844,000,000 - The total amount of government debt in the world.
-$56,280,790,000,000 - The total amount of debt (government, corporate, consumer, etc.) in the U.S. financial system.
-$61,000,000,000,000 - The combined total assets of the 50 largest banks in the world.
-$70,000,000,000,000 - The approximate size of total world GDP.
-$190,000,000,000,000 - The approximate size of the total amount of debt in the entire world.  It has nearly doubled in size over the past decade.
-$212,525,587,000,000 - According to the U.S. government, this is the notional value of the derivatives that are being held by the top 25 banks in the United States.  But those banks only have total assets of about 8.9 trillion dollars combined.  In other words, the exposure of our largest banks to derivatives outweighs their total assets by a ratio of about 24 to 1.
-$600,000,000,000,000 to $1,500,000,000,000,000 - The estimates of the total notional value of all global derivatives generally fall within this range.  At the high end of the range, the ratio of derivatives to global GDP is more than 21 to 1.
Are you starting to get the picture?
Every single day, the total amount of debt will continue to grow faster than the total amount of money until the day that this bubble bursts.
What we witnessed back in 2008 was just a little "hiccup" in the system.  It caused the worst economic downturn since the Great Depression, but global financial authorities were able to get things stabilized.
Next time it won't be so easy.
The next wave of the economic collapse is quickly approaching.  A full-blown economic depression has already started in southern Europe.  Unemployment is at record highs and economic activity is contracting rapidly.
The major offshore banking centers in Cyprus are on the verge of collapsing.  It was just announced that they will now be closed until Tuesday, but nobody really knows for sure when they will be allowed to reopen.  And there is already talk that when they do reopen that there will be strict limits on how much money people can take out.
And now the IMF is warning that the three biggest banks in Slovenia are failing and that a billion euros will be needed to bail them out.
The dominoes are starting to tumble, and the United States won't be immune.  In fact, the greatest financial problems that the United States has ever seen are on the horizon.
But you can just have faith that Ben Bernanke, Barack Obama and the U.S. Congress know exactly what they are doing and will be able to save us from the coming financial collapse if you want.
The mainstream media will provide you with all of the positive economic news that you could possibly want.  They are giddy about the fact that the Dow keeps hitting all-time highs and they would have us all believe that we are in the midst of a robust economic recovery.  You can listen to them if you want to.
But when you are tempted to believe that everything is going to be "okay" somehow, just go back and look at the numbers there were posted above one more time.
There is no way that the global financial pyramid scheme is going to be able to hold up for too much longer.  At some point it is going to totally collapse.  When that happens, will you be ready?
The New World Order Is Coming
Be Sociable, Share!

Ergo: A Bogus Reel, A Mission Accomplished

Ergo: A Bogus Reel, A Mission Accomplished

ERGO:
A BOGUS REEL,
A MISSION ACCOMPLISHED

The definition of fascism to me is a political system based on a very powerful leader, state control and extreme pride in country and race, and in which political opposition is not allowed. Fascists tend to create a religious nationalism and exceptionalism for government, country and party policy. They are efficient in using a state-run propaganda machine to create a consensus acceptance of their philosophies and the state eliminates those who question their motives through the use of a militarized police force.
Pull out an encyclopedia and you get this definition of fascism: “Totalitarian philosophy of government that glorifies the state and nation and assigns to the state control over every aspect of national life. The name was first used by the party started by Benito Mussolini who ruled Italy from 1922 until the Italian defeat in World War II. However, it has also been applied to similar ideologies in other countries, e.g., to Nazism in Germany and to the regime of Francisco Franco in Spain. The term is derived from the Latin Fasces.
I guess you can console yourself into thinking that we aren’t that bad off in the United States, and yet others may see the definition and apply it to “big brother” posturing by the state. Celebrity status is being doled out to our president as he sharpens his smile while squashing of the will of the people when they try to govern themselves.
In the United States it is amazing to see how the majority don’t we see the similarities of fascism with the antics of the aggregate of people in the high positions of government and power.
We have a propaganda machine that sells out every day for the sake of entertaining the flocks with television shows and movies that water down the ugliness of man’s inhumanity to man. We wrap it in ‘love’ and ‘sex’. We twist history for the sake of not offending the home team and take liberties in painting others that are different, who speak different, or look different with an ugly brush.
We throw it together in a heavily consulted and scrutinized script.
We give it to the square-jawed actor who is trying to kick his narcotics habit and an actress who has successfully cured her food habit and appears to be malnourished like a Jew in a concentration camp.
We are allowed to have choice in this country to try and avoid the “no spin” zone or the “no propaganda” mix; however, the message that needs to get out will find its way to you. Choice that really isn’t a choice is now becoming the norm for many people who wish to get their information from sources that have not been compromised and continually praise the empire no matter how out of control they appear.
When faced with the reality of “no good choice” people tend to dismiss it as “conspiracy theory” or a “paranoid delusion.” They think “Why is it that I never hear of this in the media?” or “It is not in my bible“ or “Our leaders would never let this happen in the United States.” In 1996, a random telephone survey of 800 American adults found that 74 percent – or nearly 3 out of four citizens – did not trust the decisions made by our government officials.
In the year 2001, all that started changing rapidly. Through a series of well-thought-out propaganda ads, books, news reports and movies there was a new nationalism being pushed. The nationalism was disguised as patriotism for our new Republican wunderkind George W. Bush.
During the Memorial Day weekend of 2001, there seemed to be an outpouring of curious retrospectives on the attacks at Pearl Harbor on December 7th, 1941. Back then I thought it was odd and did a show about it. I came down hard on the film ‘Pearl Harbor‘ that starred Ben Affleck and Kate Beckinsale. I pointed out how it was an inaccurate history of ‘Pearl Harbor’, I had many guests say the same thing and it also made the Japanese, especially Japanese-Americans, look bad.
I also was curious as to why that out of the blue we were being bombarded with this “America attacked” propaganda. It was a horrible film and yet 30 million people saw it. At the 2001 Golden Raspberry Awards, ‘Pearl Harbor’ was nominated for six awards: Worst Picture, Worst Director, Worst Actor (Ben Affleck), Worst Screenplay, Worst Screen Couple, and Worst Remake or Sequel. It had a budget of 150 million dollars. Looking back we can determine that the movie ‘Pearl Harbor’ had only one purpose: To spread the ‘Pearl Harbor’ meme in the public mind in preparation for 9/11.


When reality imitates cinematic fiction, cinema no longer functions as the ‘prosthesis for memory’ but as an intact body for what is to come in the future. Rather than just preserving history, film instead furnishes a syntax and lens through which reality is being fore-structured. The film medium has always had the potential for mesmerizing and creating a way to convey a message through magical means. Aleister Crowley once commented film and optic projection fulfill the “mystic fire” or “magic lantern” ritual.
Flashing colors and symbolism prepare the initiate for shamanistic truth.
In 2002, I remember a book that was written by Bob Woodward called ‘Bush At War‘. The narrative was very telling about what was being talked about in Washington D.C. planning rooms just prior to the attacks on September 11th, 2001. George W. Bush’s presidency had been beset by numerous problems. Not only was it in many people’s eyes invalid, very few people took him seriously as a world statesman. In the book there was a narrative about Donald Rumsfeld that indicated that in Rumsfeld’s first eight months back in the Pentagon, he pushed two major agendas. First, he felt the military needed to be beefed up and prepared for some nebulous “transformation.” Rumsfeld’s second agenda was promoting a book about Pearl Harbor.
He routinely handed out or recommended a book called ‘Pearl Harbor: Warning and Decision‘ by Roberta Wohlstetter. He often would point out that Pearl Harbor was our greatest military blunder and would often read the forward of the book by Thomas Schelling that says “There is a tendency in our planning to confuse the unfamiliar with the improbable.
It is interesting to note that Wholstetter’s book advocated preemptive strikes around the world, taking out possible threats before they can exploit our susceptibility to surprise attacks.
This is also curious because the year prior to this “The Project for the New American Century” was published. PNAC was first written in Israel. It was put together by Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Lewis (Scooter) Libby, Douglas Feith, Bill Kristal , Elliot Abrams, Aaron Friedberg, Donald Kagan Robert Kagan, Stephen Rosen , Eliot A. Cohen Paula Dobriansky, Fred C. Ikle, and Norman Podhoretz.
Dick Cheney along with Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis Libby had compiled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses” as an 90 page addendum to PNAC. What it entailed was a plan that many Americans did not know about. These men had secretly plotted a major imperial expansion of American power that included a greatly increased military budget and invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, primarily to secure oil supplies, but also to control the region generally.
But they believed that the American people would not have the will for such actions without some devastating attack or a “new Pearl Harbor” from outside the country that would galvanize them through fear and anger to support it. In short, they had already envisioned facilitating a major attack on the United States in order to gain the public support for their policy goals.
It’s not at all uncommon for criminals to tell you exactly what they’re planning to do; Hitler wrote ‘Mein Kampf‘, Mao, Stalin, and others wrote extensive manifestos on their ideology and future vision.
People have questioned whether the attacks of September 11th, 2001 were part of some inside job or elaborate secret plan. If intent is any indicator, then we have in writing the evidence needed for an investigation. If the movie ‘Pearl Harbor’ with Ben Affleck was a propaganda film to sell the American people on a future attack scenario then who knew what was truly happening — was Affleck aware? Was Kate Beckensale?
Rumsfeld’s and Affleck’s Pearl Harbor propaganda campaign set the stage for the chorus of Pearl Harbor comparisons on September 11th, 2001. On Air Force One, as Bush flew from Florida to Nebraska, the event was already being framed as a new Pearl Harbor. Henry Kissinger quickly echoed the Pearl Harbor comparison. Zbigniew Brzezinski pronounced, “9/11 is more murderous even than Pearl Harbor, and the psychological impact is the same.” On the evening of September 11th, 2001, George W. Bush reportedly confided to his diary, “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today.
You may be asking yourself why I’m pointing all of this stuff out now and why should you be aware of it?
Because of another propaganda film that Ben Affleck was involved in called ‘Argo’, the very same film that garnered him the Oscar and had it presented to him by the first lady Michelle Obama literally giving it her blessing and also the President’s.


‘Argo’ is about the storming of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979. Iranian revolutionaries took 52 Americans hostage, but six were able to escape. Those who escaped hid in the residence of the Canadian Ambassador. The CIA developed a covert operation to get them out of Iran by using a fake movie as the cover story. Affleck stars as CIA officer Tony Mendez.

It seems that the obvious relationship between Affleck and the CIA has made a few people curious and now the rumors are flying that Ben Affleck maybe a CIA agent. Conspiracy theories and rumors fly about Hollywood all the time, but this particular rumor seems to be getting the attention of the newspapers and may even reach the mainstream news as Iran plans to sue Hollywood and the producers of ‘Argo’ for misrepresenting the people of Iran throughout the entire film. Iran cultural officials talked to an internationally-renowned French lawyer Isabelle Coutant-Peyre over filing a lawsuit against Hollywood during a meeting held in Tehran’s Palestine cinema. The meeting was held alongside a conference titled ‘The Hoax of Hollywood‘ organized by the Iranian Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. ‘The Hoax of Hollywood‘ conference was programmed to review Hollywood’s plans for the production of anti-Iran movies which promote Iranophobia. Many critics believe that ‘Argo’ is an attempt to describe Iranians as “overemotional, irrational, insane, and diabolical while at the same, the CIA agents are represented as heroically patriotic.


Made on a budget of about 44 million dollars by Warner Bros., Ben Affleck’s ‘Argo’ is replete with historical inaccuracies and distortions in cinematic representation of the 1979 US embassy incident in Iran. Not only is it historically inaccurate, but it also treats the viewer to a violent Iran and that the timing of the release of this film is to get Americans ready to hate the Islamic country again as we prepare to team up with Israel and go to war against them. With the track record of ‘Pearl Harbor’ and Affleck’s role and what it eventually led up to, conspiracy theorists and statisticians are now making the claim that war with Iran will be inevitable by early summer and that ‘Argo’ was the CIA’s attempt to get people to see Iran as a hostile threat.


Iran’s PressTV ran a story written by 9/11 conspiracy theorist and author Kevin Barrett that raised the possibility that ‘Argo’ is a “covert operation disguised as a movie.” Barrett cites Barbara Honegger, a researcher and political analyst for Ronald Reagan and author of “October Surprise.” She also makes the bold claim that Affleck may very well be a war criminal. She also stated that ‘Argo’ is the propaganda project of an intelligence agency or agencies, and that its purpose is to convince the American people to go along with Israel’s plan to drag America into a war on Iran. Once again this is another example of how the media and Hollywood are used by the alphabet agencies. If you recall a really bad film about Muslims was somehow linked to the September 11th, 2012 attacks in Benghazi. It was later revealed that the film probably had nothing to do with the tragedy. The mainstream media however milked the story and confused the event in order to distract people from asking for accountability about why American citizens were killed there.
We now have to admit that the corporate media and Hollywood want to shape public opinion. In the U.S. there are 1,500 newspapers, 1,100 magazines, 9,000 radio stations, 1,500 TV stations, 2,400 publishers all owned by just three corporations.
We would have to surmise that there are agents working for these corporations and that a lot of what he hear, read and see is propaganda to get us to believe the spin on stories of criminal behavior and malfeasance. All the rest of the so-called independent reporters are called conspiracy theorists by the corporate-owned media.
Does anyone want to believe that what the networks and Hollywood does is honest journalism or an unbiased portrayal of history? Not only that but many people believed that ‘Argo’ did not deserve the Oscar. Movie critics said it was one of the best films and yet audiences found it to be boring.
‘Argo’ may be the most self-congratulatory film Hollywood and the CIA has ever made and now it seems it is the most obvious piece of propaganda since the ‘Pearl Harbor’ film that was released prior to 9/11.
This says a lot about how Obama will go to great lengths to push his imperial agenda. Hollywood marches in unison with the empire, and now aim to blatantly misinform, manipulate public sentiment, and manufacture consent. We believe what is fed to us because it is always about how they say so.

DIANE FEINSTEIN MK ULTRA CULT MISTRESS

Posted by George Freund on March 20, 2013 at 8:20 AM

-
WE ARE WORKING ON A MAJOR STORY. STAY TUNED. DIANE FEINSTEIN APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN MORE DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE MURDERS OF MAYOR GEORGE MOSCONE AND CITY COMMISSIONER HARVEY MILK THAN EVER ALLEGED. SHE CARRIED THE EXACT MAKE, MODEL AND CALIBER OF WEAPON. SHE WAS THE ONLY 'WITNESS' TO THE ALLEGED KILLER'S ESCAPE. SHE WAS 'FIRST' ON THE SCENE. SHE HAS BEEN ALLEGED TO HAVE BEEN A MEMBER OF JIMMY JONES' PEOPLE'S TEMPLE. DON'T DRINK THE KOOL AID!!! STAY TUNED TO CONSPIRACY CAFE!!!
-

-

-
SCENE FROM THE MOVIE MILK WHERE DAN WHITE ALLEGEDLY SHOOTS HARVEY MILK. DIANE FEINSTEIN WAS FIRST ON THE SCENE. SHE PUT HER FINGERS IN THE BULLET HOLES TO CHECK HIS PULSE EVEN THOUGH BOTH VICTIMS WERE GIVEN THE COUP DE GRACE IN THE HEAD. DID THE HOLLOW POINTS COME FROM HER GUN? WE EXPLORE!!!
-
-
WITH CULT MASTER EXPERIENCE LIKE THAT DARE WE SAY SANDY HOOK WAS 'CHILD'S PLAY.'

Streisand Effect, China Syndrome, & Libel Allegations OR “What A Copyright Troll Probably Shouldn’t Do”

As the 2 April 13, Brett Gibbs/Prenda Law/Alan Cooper/…… hearing fast approaches, I thought I would go over a small part of the voluntarily dismissed libel/defamation case that was filed in Florida, by John Steele on 24 Feb 13.   2013-02-24-MiamiDade Complaint   2013-03-06-SD Fla notice of voluntary dismissal   Thank you Philly Law Blog.  The fact that he did file this case and eventually dismiss it is not my opinion.  The remaining portions of this article are from my analysis – based on available facts and opinions.  If anyone out there disagrees with my analysis or specific parts of it, please by all means post it or email me (doesrayme2011@hotmail.com).  Whatever you send me will be fairly evaluated and if a correction is needed, I have no problem doing so.  Even if I decide not to do a correction, I will post your views.  This goes for all of my articles and comments on dietrolldie.com.  The discussion we have here on the issue of Copyright Trolling may get heated at times, but I will not stop the open discussion because someone’s feelings are hurt.  Myself and other posters have been ridiculed and made fun of because we are trying to educate the masses on what the Trolls are doing.  If this is still an issue for you, please fill out the attached form and present it to the nearest Law Enforcement official.    HurtFeelingsForm
In the Florida case, the Plaintiff (John Steele) claimed the following on page 2-3 of the complaint (page separation was removed).
complaint1_20744(FL)
I never thought DieTrollDie was sophisticated.  It is also no more childish then “BitTottent Bull” or other pseudonyms.  As far as if someone needs intense psychological therapy, I’m willing to bet that their issues were there long before any comments were made that hurt someone’s feelings.  The reason we “hide” behind these names is because we know the Trolls will come after us in an attempt to silence us.  Hell, Brett Gibbs (Plaintiff for Ingenuity 13 LLC) made a motion to disqualify Judge Wright when a case didn’t go their way.  Who made that decision?  Smooth move.
tor_ru1I have stated this fear of vindictive prosecution in the various declarations (Torpedoes) I have sent to the courts around the country.  These libel and defamation law suits only go to show that my fears are justified.  Note: Hopefully by the time this is posted, a new Torpedo will have reached its target.

Example Of How A Comment Was Taken Out Of Context In The Complaint

On page 29-30 of the complaint (1:13-cv-20744-JAL), Plaintiff claims the following was a libelous statement.
163.  Thank you John Steele. You still haven’t figured out that each time you post, you only help us. Yes a law firm against the Does, that is impressive. Can’t wait to see how you fair against DWT. And John, please stop it with the “Fight Piracy” bit, nobody buys that claim. It is more accurate to say you were thinking of new ways to make money off unsuspecting new Does.  (S. 121)
Now please take a look at the actual full statement (below), as well as the statement from “johndoe” that it was in response to.  Parts of my comments are missing.  I wonder why?  I believe the statement was made by John Steele – I base this on the use of the Mullvad Web proxy and on previous taunting comments made on dietrolldie.com and fightcopyrighttrolls.com.  Yes it is my opinion and I’m willing to listen to alternate views. 
Comment to the following DTD articleCOMCAST Is Starting To Get Fed Up With The Trolls – AF Holdings LLC, v. Does 1-1058, case 1:12-cv-00048-BAH (DC)
————————————————–
johndoe
johndoe@iamtoocheaptopayforthings.com
94.75.220.77 (Mullvad Web Proxy in Sweden, host: m4.mullvad.net)
2012/02/20 at 9:04 pm UTC (4:04 PM EST)
Hello everyone!!
Just sitting here with a nice pale ale, enjoying the various blog posts and thinking of how to better fight piracy. Feeling pretty good about this issue and enjoy exploring the finer points of this litigation with the very distinguished jurists in DC, with whom I have the utmost respect.
I think you guys should just stick to picking on the Hashmis and Stones of the world. After all, not many articles out there about how a certain Miami firm is having any problems with the courts. I guess we will see.
BTW, what firm are you going to call DTD? After all, we have seen your legal mind in all its glory Next time, don’t embarrass yourself, at least ask a law student for help.
“DAMN THE TORPEDOS, FULL SPEED AHEAD!!”
—————————————————————————————————
DTD Response on 4:45PM EST – Please note how certain parts were edited out (I have bolded them) prior to adding it to the Florida law suit (FL Miami-Dade #13-6680 CA 4 | Federal case 1:13-cv-20744-JAL, Document 1-2, Pages 29-30).  Note: John Steele dismissed this case on 6 Mar 13.
Hitting the bottle a bit early on a Monday? I see your ego got you to respond pretty fast. Thank you John Steele. You still haven’t figured out that each time you post, you only help us. Yes a law firm against the Does, that is impressive. Can’t wait to see how you fair against DWT. And John, please stop it with the “Fight Piracy” bit, nobody buys that claim. It is more accurate to say you were thinking of new ways to make money off unsuspecting new Does. Go ahead and make fun of my efforts; it comes across as protesting too much. Claim you firm is untouchable; that will only make the fall that much funnier.
DTD :)
——————————————
Please judge for yourself – any libel or defamation?
I find it particularly funny that this part was removed, “Claim you firm is untouchable; that will only make the fall that much funnier.”  Why would this portion be removed from the complaint???   Based on what is happening in California (2:12-cv-08333), this comment hits home.   I also love this comment –
After all, not many articles out there about how a certain Miami firm is having any problems with the courts. I guess we will see.
Yes “we will see.” 2 April 2013.  How about the fact that AF Holdings is now dismissing some of its cases in various courts (Popehat article).   Damage control?  Too little too late in my opinion.  Streisand effect & China Syndrome come to mind.
I will end this with that I believe the various real plaintiffs have a right to seek redress for instances of copyright infringement.  But it needs to be based on fairness and not a business model.  I may not have the answer to fix this problem, but that doesn’t mean I cannot point out the problems with Copyright Trolling.  Disagree with me?  OK, my feelings will not be hurt.
DieTrollDie :)
CBC 26 Aug 2011 Public Figure John Steele – Audio Interview.
Forbes Interview of John Steele
Graphic from @JohnHeneryLawyer – Wow!
Posted in Prenda Law Inc. | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |

sharkmp4: The Prenda Law Honeypot THIS ARTICLE MAY CONTAIN OFFENSIVE LANGUAGE DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE THING BEING DISCUSSED

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.