Noah Pozner’s “Death Certificate” 

by MHB Administrator • Guest Posts • Tags: Florida Atlantic University, Gary Stein, gun control, Howard Greenberg, Howard Saltz, Lenny Pozner, media disinformation, news media, propaganda, public opinion, Sandy Hook Elementary, Sandy Hook Massacre 3rd Anniversary: Two parents target FAU conspiracy theorist, South Florida Sun-Sentinel

As Posted Online by Lenny Pozner    http://memoryholeblog.com/2016/02/04/noah-pozners-death-certificate/#more-24717

“To try to stop the harassment, [Lenny] Pozner posted his son’s birth and death certificates online, along with the medical examiner’s report. The hoaxers responded by insisting the records were counterfeit … It is good Tracy is no longer on FAU’s payroll. It is heartbreaking that his actions still haunt the Pozners. The sooner James Tracy disappears from the news and the Pozners’ lives, the better. -“Sandy Hook Family Haunted By Doubters: FAU Professor Rightfully Fired, Union Shouldn’t Defend Him,” South Florida Sun Sentinel Editorial Board, January 18, 2016. 

Veterans Today
Upon first consideration, Lenny’s “death certificate” for Noah Pozner looks authentic, where questions only arise when you take a closer look. For it to have been published by his father, Lenny is a significant development, since it is the first concrete proof we have that any child actually died at Sandy Hook. As we have emphasized, there have been extraordinary efforts to suppress information about these 20 deaths:
[Click to enlarge.]


As Dennis Cimino has observed, why would the state need to use different typewriter ribbons on that certificate for different fields of it? And why is the certificate clearly with shaded areas that are not uniform like authentic death certificates are?
You can clearly see that the typewriter clarity is blurry in some fields and clear and crisp in the others, meaning that, while the blurry ones may have been done with a typewriter, the clear sections were photoshopped into the document. His observations have been reinforced by those sent to me by Bob Sims:

(1) I am rather surprised, according to the copy you posted, that any branch of government was still using typewriters at all, when computers can do it so much better. However, the use of a typewriter in this case makes it much easier to spot fraud. (2) For starters, can you see any reason for the government typist to change the ball back and forth on the IBM machine I must assume was being used, because I cannot think of a reason to go to the extra trouble, and what for? (3) For example, look at the very top in Box 3, where the date is posted. Why is that type clearly smaller than the rest of the page? You would have to change the ball for this, but for what reason? (4) Now look at the capital “A” in Box 12 for Residence (Alpine). It is identical to the capital “A” in Box 22 for Mailing Address (Alpine). It is also identical to the capital “A” in Box 33 for Funeral Home. This is totally as expected, is it not? Read on. (5) Note that the capital “A” in question above in three different boxes has a small flag at its pinnacle. Compare that to the capital “A”, without the small flag in Box 4, Time of Death, Box 26, City or Town, Box 27, County of Death, and Box 39, Time Pronounced, and in Box 46, Time of Injury. (6) Compare Box 1, “Noah,” with Box 7, “November,” and you will clearly see that the spacing between the “N” and the “o” is quite different. (7) Compare Box 1, the “N” in “Noah,” with Box 26, the “N” in “SANDY.” They are clearly different. (8) Compare Box 1, “Samuel,” with Box 11, “Sandy,” and again, the spacing between the “S” and the “a” is clearly not the same. (9) In fact, the entire spacing in Box 1 is unlike any other in the forged document. (10) Compare the name “Pozner” in Box 1 with “Pozner” in Box 20, clearly not the same.

Noah Pozner’s death certificate is a fake, which we have proven on a dozen or more different grounds. But if Sandy Hook had been real, there would have been no reason to fake it. QED
Moreover, Noah Pozner’s “death certificate” states that “No autopsy was performed”, while the “official report” states, “All the victims were given autopsies”. We know they cannot both be true. It would be tempting to presume that one of them is accurate and the other a mistake. But insofar as they are both predicated on the presupposition Noah Pozner and 19 other children actually died at Sandy Hook, they both appear to be false. We have no authentic proof that any of those children, including Noah Pozner, actually died. None–for the obvious reason that none of them died!
(The above passage is excerpted from the 2015 article, “Are Sandy Hook critics delusional with ‘twisted minds’?“-Ed.)

Gemstones Are Forever: Bond, Elrod House, Onassis, Hughes & JFK

Gemstones Are Forever: Bond, Elrod House, Onassis, Hughes & JFK

What is the most synchromystic, conspiracy-laden James Bond film?

The answer is an obvious one. It happens to be the cinematic expression that revealed Ian Fleming's leaking of the Gemstone Files, in one of the 23 Bond films that have been made through 2012: Diamonds Are Forever (1971).

The visual and design legacy of Frank Lloyd Wright is to be found prominently in this movie. FLW-trained architect John Lautner's Elron House is one of the important filming locations, serving as the Howard Hughes-clone character Willard Whyte's "winter home."

Before learning from FLW in the 1930s, John Lautner's background was in Michigan, and he got his start in building at 12 years old. His family built a rural residence together, a cabin they named Midgaard, "a word from Norse mythology that described the home of mankind, situated between the land of ice and the land of fire."

Considering Lautner's Elrod (Old English for "noble counsel") House was built on client interior designer Arthur Elrod's 23 acre property in Palm Springs, California, in 1968, and the film was released in 1971, the shooting occurred soon after the house was constructed. 

The following three images are from the Elrod House in Diamonds Are Forever. The House is the focus of Bond's meeting with the two female guards – Thumper and Bambi – who are the precursor characters for future acrobatic sci-fi fight sequences (including those seen in Blade Runner and Kill Bill). It is also the location of Bond's release of the "real" Willard Whyte character.

The Internet has many recent photos, including the following, of Lautner's masterpiece, as well as the floor plans, because the Elrod House has been up for sale for a bit under 14 million dollars for a few years.

The Elrod House is a "gem" and thus a metaphor for the entire underlying, less than subtle theme, so apparent in the title of this film, Diamonds Are Forever. But do not fool yourself, these are hardly ordinary gemstones.

A detailed analysis of Diamonds Are Forever is included in David Hatcher Childress' chapter, "James Bond & The Gemstone File" (pages 69-90), contained in Inside the Gemstone File: Howard Hughes, Onassis & JFK by Kenn Thomas and David Hatcher Childress (Kempton, Illinois: Adventures Unlimited Press, 1999). Here is one short selection from the greater chapter [with a few comments added by me]:

In the filmed story of Diamonds Are Forever, the plot remarkably parallels The Gemstone File years before the Skeleton Key to the Gemstone File was ever circulated. The plot begins in the diamond fields of South Africa, as in Fleming's original book [1956], but soon diverges from the book to bring in elements of The Gemstone File and the Mafia/Las Vegas/Area 51 entanglement.

Bond is assigned to follow a trail of diamonds from South Africa to Amsterdam and then to Las Vegas where he is confronted by the Mafia. In one scene, James Bond sneaks into a secret facility in the Nevada desert outside of Las Vegas. This facility is the location of Mercury, the exit off that interstate highway leading to Area 51, the top secret space facility in south central Nevada rumored to house flying saucers and alien technology. 

 

Once inside the facility, Bond pretends to be a worker in a lab coat and walks into a room where a German engineer is in charge. The man is clearly meant to be Werner von Braun. After witnessing the faking of the Apollo Moon missions, Bond steals the lunar rover and escapes into the desert. Does Diamonds Are Forever mirror the truth about NASA being part of a secret conspiracy? In the movie, the space facility and the Mafia are working together.

The movie, however, turns out to be the story of a kidnapped billionaire named Williard Whyte (played by Jimmy Dean of pork sausage fame), who is held in seclusion by [Ernst Stavro] Blofeld, exactly as [Bruce] Roberts claimed [American billionaire Howard] Hughes [sharing the double initials HH, just like Williard Whyte, WW ~ LC] was held captive by [Greek-born billionaire Aristotle Sokratis] Onassis.
Bond frees the kidnapped Willard Whyte and proceeds, with the help of Tiffany Case (played by Jill St. John), to attack Blofeld at his secret base: an oil platform either off the coast of Texas or California, the movie does not indicate which. [Yes, it does. The secret oil platform is shown off Baja California on a global map of Blofeld's empire, which matches the Onassis reach, btw ~ LC.] Bond destroys the oil platform but Blofeld escapes to reappear briefly in the 1981 film For Your Eyes Only when he is finally dispatched permanently. By this time, Onassis was dead as well.
Indeed, the parallels between Diamonds Are Forever and The Gemstone File are many:
*Willard Whyte is held captive in Las Vegas by Blofeld and the Mafia.
*Howard Hughes is held captive in Las Vegas and elsewhere by Onassis and the Mafia.
*Blofeld owns a casino named Casino Royale in Monte Carlo and has various "doubles."
*Onassis owns a casino named Casino Royale in Monte Carlo and Onassis has various "doubles" concocted by Onassis and Maheu.
*Blofeld owns oil fields and oil platforms. He is protected by foreign countries.
*Onassis owns oil tankers and has an exclusive deal with Saudi Arabia. He is protected by foreign countries such as Greece and Monaco.
*Blofeld owns his own island, high-tech yacht fleet, and private army.
*Onassis owns his own island (Skorpios), has a high-tech yacht fleet (Onassis owned many, many ships), and controlled a private army that allegedly went beyond the Mafia to the Marseille underground and the CIA and FBI.
*Diamonds Are Forever was about the secret NASA base outside of Las Vegas, and the use of diamonds to make a space-based laser system, one that could project holographic images into the sky.
*The Gemstone File is about synthetic rubies and their use by Hughes in laser research and Roberts' later use of these synthetic rubies as "gifts" with an attached "Gemstone Letter" that revealed certain behind-the-scenes activities of Onassis, the Mafia and the CIA to important and wealthy individuals. Las Vegas was the scene of Hughes' kidnapping and imprisonment, a city well known to be owned and run by the Mafia and their overt partners.

As Kenn Thomas and David Hatcher Childress theorize in their book, Inside the Gemstone File, Ian Fleming, a former British intelligence agent, used his books to unfold the secrets that he had discovered about Onassis and others through material that would someday be called the Gemstone File. Considering that several of the Bond books were published long before many of the events were exposed in the dots that have since been connected and then shown in the films, Fleming walked a narrow, dangerous path.

The Gemstone File is a conspiracy theory document attributed to Bruce Porter Roberts. In 1975, "A Skeleton Key to the Gemstone File" appeared and is generally attributed to Stephanie Caruana. The "Key" is purportedly a synopsis of Roberts' documents that presents a chronicle of interlocking conspiracies, including claims that world events since the 1950s were shaped by suppressed information, the names of supposed shooters of President John F. Kennedy, and suggested connections between a number of political assassinations which occurred within a relatively short time frame. Many of these show up in Ian Fleming's James Bond novels, and thus in the movies that followed.

The Gemstone File proposes that Aristotle Onassis, JFK's father Joseph P. Kennedy, and other prominent figures were involved in various schemes to forward a vast global conspiracy, involving the Mafia and corrupt politicians, brutal oil and drug cartels, rogue military operations, and more. It also posits that early in 1957, Aristotle Onassis had Howard Hughes kidnapped from his Beverly Hills Hotel bungalow; that Hughes suffered a massive brain injury during the forcible kidnapping, and that Hughes was subsequently a virtual prisoner of Onassis on his private island Skorpios and injected regularly with morphine, while Onassis took over the operation of Hughes's considerable financial affairs, including airlines and U.S. defense contracting. Post-Fleming author John Gardner would overtly title one of his James Bond books, Scorpius (1988).

Aristotle Onassis and Jacqueline "Jackie" Lee Bouvier Kennedy Onassis

The Gemstone File portrays Onassis as the main force behind the election of John F. Kennedy as President, and subsequently, Kennedy's assassination in 1963. According to the documents, Lee Harvey Oswald was a patsy in the JFK assassination plan and was linked to the Central Intelligence Agency, and to Mafia connections in Lafayette Square, New Orleans, with Jimmy Fratianno, Johnny Roselli, and Eugene Brading as the real shooters. The Gemstone papers claim that John F. Kennedy, Robert F. Kennedy and Joseph P. Kennedy were involved with the Mafia and Onassis, and when the Kennedy brothers attempted to break away, they were murdered. We know too what happened between Onassis and Jackie O, after the death of JFK. Wild theories and thoughts, perhaps, indeed, but then when connecting dots in conspiracy speculations, when are such not radical, raging, and rough?

"On December 20, 1947, Jacob Rubenstein changed his name to Jack L. Ruby by decree of the 68th Judicial Court of Dallas, Texas. The etymology of the term 'Ruby': (French) rubis; (Spanish) rubi; (Latin) rubinus, carbuncle….The term 'Jack Ruby' was once used by pawnbrokers to indicated a fake ruby. In iconography a ruby or carbuncle symbolizes blood, suffering and death." ~ from King-Kill 33 by James Shelby Downard.

Childress writes further in his Bond analysis: "Ian Fleming [at the age of 56] died of mysterious circumstances in Jamaica on August 12, 1964, of a 'heart attack.' According to Bruce Roberts, the 'sodium morphate' used by Onassis and the Mafia made the victim appear to have died from a massive heart attack….In August of 1964…Fleming was planning to fly from Jamaica to New Jersey to meet with Ivan T. Sanderson, a biologist and former British Intelligence agent. As a zoologist, Sanderson had written a number of books, including one on Bigfoot and Yeti, and appeared frequently on radio shows and even Johnny Carson's Tonight Show."
The late Ivan T. Sanderson (a friend of mine) was a Fortean researcher and author on topics including the Philadelphia Experiment, as well, a subject about which Sanderson appears to have been corresponding with Fleming.
Childress continues, "Fleming never made it to his rendezvous with Sanderson. He died of a sudden heart attack on August 12th, 1964 at his home in Jamaica…[on] the 21st anniversary of The Philadelphia Experiment (August 12, 1943)….Was Ian Fleming killed because he knew too much about such things as the Kennedy assassination, The Philadelphia Experiment and the genesis of UFO technology?"

We perhaps shall never know, but awareness of the world may be revealed, frighteningly, more through watching Diamonds Are Forever than turning in to the nightly news, where the selling of automobiles and drive-through-hamburgers is the goal.

There has been fifty years of James Bond movies. Much is unfolded in fiction worth our attention. The 23rd Bond film, Skyfall, will be released in November 2012.

 

Posted by Loren Coleman at http://copycateffect.blogspot.com/2012/07/gemstones.html

Overwhelming Majority of Americans Believe that Both Parties Are Too Corrupt to Change Anything … “This, In Fact, Is A Revolution”

Why Americans Are Backing Trump and Sanders Over the Mainstream Candidates Backed By the Political Machines ~hehe do ya "think" all u's dummycocks &republipubes R finally ...waking the FUCK UP ?!? ya know the lesser of 2 evils crowd ... ya know THAT haven't figured the fuck OUT ...yet ... that evil+evil= fucking EVIL

By Washington's Blog

Global Research, February 09, 2016

Washington's Blog 8 February 2016

Region: USA

Theme: Politics and Religion

In-depth Report: U.S. Elections

We’ve previously noted that polls show that Americans are in a “pre-revolutionary” mood, that less than 1 in 5 Americans think that the government has the “consent of the governed”, that government corruption tops the list of Americans’ fears (gee, we wonder why), and that 3 times as many Americans supported King George during the Revolutionary War than support our OWN Congress today.

You might assume that such statements are over-the-top … or that the results come from partisan pollsters.

But a  group of Republican and Democratic pollsters and political strategists reviewed polling data last week, and revealed some stunning results:

• 84% of all Americans believe political leaders are more interested in protecting their power and privilege than doing what is right

• 81% percent believe the power of ordinary people to control our country is getting weaker every day as politicians of both parties fight to protect their own power and privilege

• 80% believe the federal government is its own special interest primarily looking out for itself
• 79% of all voters believe we need to recruit and support more candidates for office, at all levels of government, who are ordinary citizens, rather than professional politicians and lawyers

• 78% believe that the Democratic and Republican Parties are essentially useless in changing anything, because both political parties are too beholden to special interests to create any meaningful change

• 76% of Americans agree with the statement that America cannot succeed unless we take on and defeat the corruption and crony capitalism in our government

• 75% believe that the US government is NOT working for the people’s best interest

• 75% believe that powerful interests have used campaign and lobbying money to rig the system for themselves

• 74% see the biased and slanted coverage of the media as part of the problem

• 72% of Americans believe the U.S. has a two-track economy, where most Americans struggle every day, where good jobs are hard to find, and where huge corporations get all the rewards

• 72% believe that the reason families in our middle class have not seen their economic condition improve for decades and economic growth is stalled is because of corruption and crony capitalism in Washington

• 71% believe our government is not only dysfunctional, it is collapsing right before our eyes

• 70% believe the government in Washington does not govern with the consent of the people

• The majority – 56% – say they wish there were a third party with a chance of success to fight for their interests

• Only 15% say the “values and principals of my political party are so important that I strongly prefer to vote for the candidates of my party…”

They concluded:

The country [is] in a prerevolutionary moment.
***
This election could mark the beginning of the end of two-party duopoly in the United States.
***
The people believe the real struggle for America is not between Democrats and Republicans, but between mainstream America and the ruling political elites of incumbent politicians, lobbyists, big business, big unions, big banks, big special interests and the big media. [The people are correct.]
***
The power elite asks, “When will this be over?” Although this is seen as a chaotic and temporary situation by most of the political and media establishment, our research shows a strong, evolving tidal wave of discontent and growing pressure for real and dramatic change.
***
Real change is what that the establishment fears most and fights hardest against. It is ultimately a losing battle.
***
This, in fact, is a revolution.

The original source of this article is Washington's Blog

Copyright © Washington's Blog, Washington's Blog, 2016

Los Angeles Police Urge Residents 'To Protect Themselves' As Violent Crime Skyrockets

Posted by George Freund on February 3, 2016  “The citizens need to know they need to be able to protect themselves because if they call 911, we can’t guarantee we’re going to get there in time to help you,”

By Michael Snyder, on February 1st, 2016

All over America, rates of violent crime are absolutely soaring. As you will see below, violent crime overall shot up by 20 percent in Los Angeles last year, and the police are telling people that “they need to be able to protect themselves” because the police may not be able to get there in time when they call. Thanks to deep budget cuts, police departments across the nation are already severely undermanned, and our major cities are now seeing crime rates increase at a pace that we have not seen in ages. In a previous article, I encouraged my readers to focus on the five basics of preparation – food, water, shelter, energy and self-defense. Of those five, it is often self-defense that is the most neglected. When bad people break into your house in the middle of the night intending to do bad things, what are you going to do? Many of us have not had to think about that for a long time, but now conditions are rapidly changing in America.

If you don’t believe me, perhaps you will believe the head of the union for the LAPD. According to him, people living in L.A. “need to be able to protect themselves” because the police “can’t guarantee we’re going to get there in time to help you”…

“The citizens need to know they need to be able to protect themselves because if they call 911, we can’t guarantee we’re going to get there in time to help you,” says Police Protective League President Jamie McBride.

He told Paige that Thursday morning between 5:30 and 10 a.m., there were just three patrol cars assigned to the West LA division. Two cars to protect more than 200,000 people in a 65 square mile radius.

“West Los Angeles, at the minimum, should have seven patrol units, two-man units working,” McBride said.

Have you ever been to Los Angeles?

I have, and even in the best of times it can be quite a mean place.

And of course these are not the best of times. In fact, the overall rate of violent crime in the city was up by 20 percent last year…

Crime is up across the board in the nation’s second-largest city.

Statistics released Wednesday by the Los Angeles Police Department show that homicides and rapes are each up 9 percent and that robberies are up 13 percent. Violent crime overall increased by 20 percent.

Perhaps you are tempted to think that L.A. is just an anomaly.

Well, let’s go from the second largest city in the country to the third largest city in the country.

There were 51 homicides in Chicago last month, which was the highest total for the city in at least 16 years. Sadly, this is just a continuation of a trend that has been going on for quite some time. The following comes from USA Today…

Chicago routinely records more homicides annually than any other American city, but the grim January violence toll marks a shocking spike in violence in a city that recorded 29 murders for the month of January last year and 20 murders for the month in 2014. In addition to the jump in killings, police department said that it recorded 241 shooting incidents for the month, more than double the 119 incidents recorded last January.

The rise in violence comes after the Chicago Police Department reported 468 murders in 2015, a 12.5% increase from the year before. There were also 2,900 shootings, 13% more than the year prior, according to police department records.

Some of the crimes that I have been seeing in the news lately are almost too horrible for words. If reading about acts of violence deeply troubles you, then you might want to stop reading this article right now. I want to share with you something that recently happened in New York City, and it is the kind of stuff that nightmares are made out of…

New York Mayor Bill de Blasio on Sunday denounced the rape of a woman by five men at a Brooklyn playground, pledging police would work to swiftly apprehend the suspects in “this vicious crime.”

Police said on Saturday the men took turns raping the 18-year-old woman at the playground operated by the New York City Parks Department in the Brownsville section of Brooklyn just after 9 p.m. on Thursday. One man pointed a gun at the father and told him to leave, police said.

After the father left, the men each assaulted the woman, police said. They fled when her father returned a short while later, accompanied by two officers.

One rapist is bad enough, but how do five young men come together and decide that they are going to randomly rape someone?

To do something so despicable your heart has got to be hard as a stone.

What in the world has happened to the morality of our society?

And to me, one of the biggest questions of this entire story is why the father decided to walk away from his daughter.

If I was in the same position, I would have stood my ground. Maybe those young men would have shot me, but there is no way that I would have ever let them have my daughter. They would have had to go over my dead body to get to her.

But this is what we are told to do today. We are told to let the criminals do whatever they want and then call the police.

Unfortunately, now the police are openly telling us that they probably won’t be able to get there in time to do any good.

As the economy slows down, crime rates are going to go even higher. When unemployment and poverty rise, people get desperate, and desperate people do desperate things.

We all need to start thinking about how we are going to protect ourselves and our families during the hard times that are coming. Different people have different methods that they prefer, and that is okay. But we are all going to have to start taking security a lot more seriously.

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/los-angeles-police-urge-residents-to-protect-themselves-as-violent-crime-skyrockets

The truth about how the 'refugee crisis' was rigged from start to finish

Posted by George Freund on February 8, 2016

by Ordo ab Chao

I show in this article how the ‘refugee crisis’ has been rigged, from start to finish, in a kind of multi-pincer movement which is using mass theatre and false social science to create a delusion in the minds of the masses. It’s a complex web that has been weaved; so I’ve broken it down to its simplest components with links for those who want to drill down deeper.

So where did it all begin?

I find it ironic that many who support open borders and mass migration tell those who can see disaster writ large in such folly that they’re “stuck in the past” and that they should “move into the 21st century”. They don’t realise that they’re mind programmed victims of a staged roll-out of an agenda that follows a plan originally cooked up around 100 years ago, known as the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan.

The Kalergi plan’s aim is the genocide of the white peoples of Europe; to replace the whites with the mixed brown races. Those who support its aims are rewarded annually with Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize; two notable previous recipients have been Angela Merkel and Herman van Rompuy.



The author of the Kalergi plan was one Richard Coudenhove Kalergi, an Austrian diplomat who established the Pan European movement in Vienna in 1922, in order to create his envisaged “New World Order”. In his book, Praktischer Idealismus, he wrote:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. The races and classes of today will gradually disappear due to the elimination of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-negroid race of the future, similar in appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples and the diversity of individuals…

So all this talk about ever-closer union has not been just about the different states of Europe converging; it’s been about peoples merging.

The rise of fascism in Europe meant that Kalergi’s project had to be put on ice for a while. But after the Second World War, Winston Churchill took it up, along with the Jewish masonic lodge B’nai B’rith, and then the usual suspects grabbed it as the perfect way to create chaos out of which to bring order – their own New World Order with one world government.

How Kalergi’s plan is being rolled out today

This so-called ‘humanitarian crisis’ is being sold to us under the bannerhead of “the Great Migration” in the same way that we were sold “the Arab Spring”; both pieces of mind programming depend upon the delusion that whole continents of people just up and spontaneously decide one morning to either rebel, or leave for pastures new.

The mainstream media is in virtual lockstep behind the Kalergi plan, and so those who are unable to think critically for themselves are being sucked into the psy-op (psychological operation). The psy-ops and false flags supporting it are too many to list here, but here’s a couple… (although really, there only needs to be one for intelligent people to ask themselves why they are being lied to on a systemic basis.)



This photo (above) shows the full story behind the so-called ‘refugees at risk of drowning’ stories in our media, with babies being held up high, out of the deep water. As the man on the top far right shows, far from being at risk of drowning, the ‘swimmers’ are in mere feet of water, and could stand up and walk out on to the beach if they wanted to. What we were actually shown on television and the papers was just the area within the white box. In any kind of theatre, context is everything.

The so-called riots at Dover in Kent, England, this weekend were also probably staged – I’d be willing to put money on it – not least because the mainstream media was very quick in its dividing of the participants into right-wing fascists and anti-fascists (antifa).

When is a fascist not a fascist? When he’s a fascist.

This is the narrative that they want us to swallow: those opposing enforced undemocratic mass migration into the UK are the fascists; those imposing enforced undemocratic mass migration into the UK are just very nice, caring people. Some of those journos need to go back to school!

The media tried to divide the issue in the exact same way when the women of Cologne protested at the New Year over more than 800 of them being sexually assaulted by Muslims. These raped women were described by the media, the BBC among them, as ‘far right Islamophobes and xenophobes’ and then the police – now out in force after being practically invisible on the night of December 31st – turned the water cannons on them.

Most of the dumbed-down consumers of mainstream media wouldn’t know a fascist if one jumped up and bit them on the bum. They have no clue that fascism is akin to having a whole new and much more dangerous way of life being imposed on you, which, in the case of opening our borders to migrants, no political party so much as mentioned, let alone stood on a platform for, at the general election less than a year ago. If it was really a battle between left and right, there would be a choice at the ballot box; there isn’t. Whoever you vote for, you get this staged mass migration.

I’m wondering who paid for all those coaches to bus those hooligans into Dover? Did they get a slap-up steak meal and all the beer they could drink thrown in with their charabanc day out to the seaside? It reminded me of the old days of football hooliganism in the Eighties and Nineties, in which our boys used to terrorise most of the major football matches across Europe. It might surprise some to learn that that was organised terror too; some of those ‘hooligans’ directing the Newcastle Brown-fuelled fear ‘n loathing on the Euro-terraces had MI5 connections.

There are dozens of examples of similar staged events in this recent crisis – the few women and children in a marching column of mainly male refugees are told to come to the front for the photographers; then there was the drowned baby that was moved and posed a certain way before his image was sent out across the world.

This isn’t to say that there aren’t real refugees caught up in this theatre; but it is to say that the number of migrant opportunists from all over Africa, not just Syria, far outweighs the number of genuine refugees, including those at the camp at Calais. Even on a technical-legal basis, none of those at Calais are refugees because they don’t meet the UN’s criteria of claiming asylum in the first country they come to. The ‘jungle’ inhabitants have not claimed asylum in the first country they reached after crossing the Mediterranean – further, they are also not claiming asylum where they are, in France, because they want to come to Britain.

The truth is that those living in the cold and squalor on the Calais coast don’t have to; they are choosing to, for obvious reasons. They are being funded by the ‘charity’ No Borders, aka George Soros, and also encouraged by the Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn who told them, last weekend, that they should be allowed to come to Britain, after which about 400 of them stormed the P&O ferry.



How else are they selling it?

The media narrative has been based upon a three-fold pincer movement; the employers are being seduced with a bright orange GM carrot of cheap, uncomplaining labour while the dumbed-down masses are having their egos flattered with the idea of “cultural enrichment”, whatever they think that is.

The third component of this psy-op is a phoney war, designed to awaken the saviour complexes in those who’ve never gone within to face their own dark sides. If you’ve not seen it in yourself, you cannot recognise it in others and you live in a permanent rainbow-coloured fug as you blithely and blindly pave the road to hell with your good intentions.

Here’s how the three components unravel …

The economics

In terms of economic benefits to a nation of mass migration, arecent report showed that this is a myth – that most migrants are unemployed for years, and that countries don’t see a benefit for at least a generation.

The report for German paper Die Welt entitled “The Truth about the Refugee Job Wonder” asks if German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s pronouncement that migrants will be the “labour revitalisation” of Germany is actually true? It turns out Syrians, Afghans and Iraqis are more likely to be unemployed than the average German by a large margin.

The Institute for Employment Research (IAB) has conducted research into migrant employment rates and found that in the case of Syrians their employment rate has dropped from 32 percent to only 9 percent as recently as last November.

Afghanis and Iraqis, who are increasingly becoming a larger proportion of migrants coming into the EU according to Frontex, don’t fare much better, with Afghan employment participation going from 37.6 percent to 24.5 percent and Iraqi employment going from 34 percent to 25.3 percent over the same five year period. To put this in perspective, the employment rate of the average German is 67.3 percent.

Migrants have an especially difficult time and even those with professional qualifications tend to have a hard time becoming employed. It is actually easier, according to the report, for an unskilled native worker.

According to IFO Institute for Economic Research migration expert Gabriel Felbermayr, “We know that people who come as refugees are much more difficult to integrate into the labor market than those who immigrate to work,” and said, “Usually it takes at least a generation,” until the employment rate, “has approached the domestic population.”

This amount of time to enter the workforce presents huge problems for the welfare system that the migrants are thought to be able to prop up.

Often the countries which they come from improve and conditions allow them to go back, meaning a zero return on investment from the costs associated with housing and education.

Employers often fail to recognise the qualifications of migrants from Africa and the Middle East as they have found their education not comparable to a European equivalent qualification. This leads many former professionals to be forced into low paid work and the report says, “for companies, the refugees are mainly a source of unskilled, low cost labour and not the engineers and academics many media sources have said.”

The ‘cultural enrichment’

As for ‘cultural enrichment’ … please see this article A Call to the Grailseekers and for a sense of national identity, check out a new genetic map of Britain which shows that there has been little movement of people in the British Isles from the original tribal kingdoms established 1500 years ago.



Added to that, 89 per cent of our DNA derives from the early farmers that settled here about 10,000 years ago. In other words, our roots are burrowed deep into this land; we’ve fought off many invaders with their ‘cultural enrichment’ in the past – and we aim to keep it that way.

The phoney war

So surely there are real refugees fleeing from our bombs in Syria and Iraq and therefore we owe it to them, to offer them refuge?

Well, yes and no … and mainly no.

First off, the smaller number of Syrian refugees who are mixed in with the mass migration of economic chancers are not fleeing from our bombs; they are fleeing from Russia’s bombs. There’s a reason why Putin has been able to make such huge inroads in destroying ISIS since he began bombing at the start of this ‘refugee crisis’. It was because our – aka the Nato coalition’s – attempts to destroy ISIS over the past couple of years have been at best pathetic, and at worst, utterly fraudulent.

Secondly, why would the Nato guys want to wipe out an army they had trained, funded and armed with stinger missiles on behalf of their Jewish allies? The answer is, they wouldn’t.

But here’s one very telling example of the phoney war: the use, or rather non-use, of the Brimstone missile.

The fact that the British RAF had this unique weapon, the Brimstone missile, was the keystone of the parliamentary debate last December. It was cited as the main reason for our allies needing our paltry few Tornado jets to enter the conflict in Syria because this £100,000 missile, with radar guidance on its nose, can take out a vehicle travelling at 70 mph.



However, it wasn’t deployed for more than a month after the debate, and questions were starting to be asked – even on mainstream political programmes . Why, some bolder journos dared to inquire, has there been such a lack of activity from the RAF over Syria since the debate, and much more importantly, why has it not yet deployed the all-important Brimstone missile?

Finally, after much pressure, the RAF finally came to life a few weeks ago and, according to the Ministry of Defence, there were two sorties over Syria – one which took out an ISIS supply truck in Raqqa and another which targeted mobile cranes at an oilfield close to the Iraq/Syria border. With the truck at Raqqa, and possibly with the mobile cranes, (unconfirmed) the RAF finally used their famous Brimstone missile.

However, it soon became clear, and was even reported by the defence correspondent on the Daily Politics on BBC2, that there had been no tactical need to use the £100,000-a-throw Brimstone for either of these military targets. The truck at Raqqa and the mobile cranes at an oilfield on the Iraq/Syria were not travelling at anything like 70 mph and much lesser expensive missiles, like the lasar-guided Paveway, could have just as easily – and much more cheaply – been deployed.

On top of that, the same BBC defence correspondent reported that there have been no reports of civilian casualties coming out of Syria; not that we want civilian casualties, of course, but in modern warfare, they are unavoidable. No civilian casualties = no military action.

Last year, just before Putin stepped in, some American flyers were reporting that they were being sent out on missions over ISIS-held territories, and then just left to circle around the target area, until they were nearly out of fuel, before being called back to base. This means that in many cases, they were unable to drop their payloads.

On top of that, we then had the spectacle of the drivers of the trucks which were carrying ISIS’s oil into Turkey being warned by an airdrop of leaflets to leave their vehicles, because they were going to be bombed.

Talking of Turkey … well that’s another whole can of worms that we don’t have the time to go into here. Suffice to say, Turkey has been acting as middle man for ISIS’s oil, and it has also been organising cheap flights for ‘refugees’ directly into Germany.

Sun Tsu must be turning in his grave! But I suppose they don’t call it a ‘theatre of war’ for nothing.

To conclude, when you add up all the evidence – and there’s only a smidgen of it in this article – we carry very little responsibility for those that have got themselves mixed up in the so-called Great Migration.

Having gone through all these arguments with those who are in favour of helping the refugees, and explaining it all thoroughly, this is usually the response:

“But it’s not about who’s to blame, nor about economics or legal technicalities! It’s about being human. Wouldn’t we hate to see ourselves as selfish and uncaring people? How can we turn them away? How could we sleep at night?”

To me, though, it’s not about a nice, cosy, satisfying self image; it’s about survival. The bald truth is, if we open up our borders to let in this so-called Great Migration, we’ll never sleep soundly in our beds again.

http://www.disclose.tv/news/the_truth_about_how_the_refugee_crisis_was_rigged_from_start_to_finish/127388