Saturday, May 17, 2014

Simplification - Tom Bearden
And 'Free Energy' 

By Leslie R. Pastor
2-29-7
The crux of Tom Bearden's published work, ultimately, is to reveal that the current 'energy' system is and has been deliberately flawed and curtailed preventing the acquisition of using 'free and abundant' sources of energy freely from the 'vacuum of space-time.' Most people presume that 'energy' is 'created' by the power companies and then transferred along a grid line directly into your homes and places of business. Nothing could be further from the truth, and, because it is true, has been deliberately hidden from the general public, academia, and our current electrical engineering schools.
 
Tom Bearden explains: The real problem is, of all things, the sadly flawed old electrical engineering model. That horrible model used today was put together by Oliver Heaviside and others in the 1880s after James Clerk Maxwell was already dead (in 1879). Today it is actually Heaviside's highly reduced vector equations, further severely reduced by Lorentz in 1892 and in 1900. Most EE's have never even seen Maxwell's actual theory (in quaternion-like mathematics) of 20 equations in 20 unknowns. They are lied to and told they are studying "Maxwell's theory", which actually is not taught in any of our universities.
 
 
[Maxwell's theory is in J. C. Maxwell, "A Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field," Royal Society Transactions, Vol. CLV, 1865, p 459. Read Dec. 8, 1864. Also in The Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, 2 vols. bound as one, edited by W. D. Niven, Dover, New York, 1952, Vol. 1, p. 526-597. In this later papers collection, two errata are given on the unnumbered page prior to page 1 of Vol. 1.  In this paper, Maxwell presents his seminal theory of electromagnetism, containing 20 equations in 20 unknowns. His general equations of the electromagnetic field are given in Part III, General Equations of the Electromagnetic Field, p. 554-564. On p. 561, he lists his 20 variables. On p. 562, he summarizes the different subjects of the 20 equations, being three equations each for magnetic force, electric currents, electromotive force, electric elasticity, electric resistance, total currents; and one equation each for free electricity and continuity. In the paper, Maxwell adopts the approach of first arriving at the laws of induction and then deducing the mechanical attractions and repulsions.]
 
 
http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/103001.htm
 
http://www.cheniere.org/techpapers/Fact_Sheets/Fact%
20Sheet%20-%20Source%20Charge%20Problem10.doc
 
The suppression of Nikola Tesla - who, among other things, planned to give free "energy from space" to the world - began in earnest in the 1890s, being directed by some of the most powerful men and organizations on earth at the time. And as J. P. Morgan remarked, "You can't put a meter on that!" (Tesla's free EM energy from space). Thus Tesla had to go. He was fairly easily suppressed by simply cutting down, and then cutting off, his funding. As is known, Tesla did in fact later power an automobile directly with "energy from space". His nephew who rode in the car with him, was still alive the last time I checked.
 
Any system freely taking and using excess EM "energy from space" to power itself or to produce more power in the loads than the operator himself inputs and pays for, is an asymmetric
 
Maxwellian system a priori. As is known today since 1957, any dipole is a broken symmetry - and that means that "something formerly nonobservable (virtual) becomes observable". Any charge is also a dipole, since it polarizes its surrounding virtual state vacuum with opposite charge. Then it takes (absorbs) virtual state EM energy from that seething virtual state vacuum medium, and re-emits it as real, observable EM energy (real photons) in all directions."
 
Borrowing work previously done by Lorenz (without the "t"), Lorentz (with the "t") further symmetrized the already sharply curtailed Heaviside vector equations in 1892, thereby arbitrarily discarding all asymmetrical Maxwellian systems. Nature did not and does not discard them. Lorentz did, and all EE departments, professors, and textbooks still blindly discard them to this very day by continuing to teach only the symmetrize Heaviside-Lorentz equations.
 
So that symmetrization neatly discards all those Maxwellian systems that could be built, and that would freely take excess energy from the vacuum and use it to power or help power the loads. In short, it discards all the COP>1.0 EFTV Maxwellian systems. Our electrical engineers are taught to think, conceive, design, build, and deploy only symmetrical systems that deliberately kill their own source of freely flowing EM energy from the vacuum, faster than they can use a bit of that energy to power the loads.
 
Think about it: circuits and current flow were deliberately designed to 'kill the flow of energy' period, necessitating, the continuous use of 'power generation' instead of relying upon the actual source of all 'energy.' The truth of the matter is, that, 'energy can neither be created or destroyed,' all that really takes place is the 'change in form of energy.' What the so-called 'power generator' does is to create a 'dipole' (- and +) enabling the flow of energy to commence from its source the 'vacuum of space-time.'
 
Tom Bearden explains: So we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator - not to power the loads, but to keep restoring the source dipole inside the generator itself. Cranking the generator shaft has nothing to do with furnishing the EM energy flow pouring from the generator terminals and out into space along the conductors of the external circuit. That out-flowing EM energy comes from the broken symmetry of the opposite charges inside the generator - the
 
asymmetry of the source dipole - once the charges are forced apart. The so-called "static" field or potential from any dipolarity is comprised of a steady flow of real photons, whose energy has been directly extracted from the seething virtual state vacuum by the asymmetry of that dipole. Lee and Yang got the Nobel Prize in 1957 for predicting broken symmetry - which was a giant revolution in physics. And, quoting Nobelist Lee:
 
".the discoveries made in 1957 established not only right-left asymmetry, but also the asymmetry between the positive and negative signs of electric charge." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New York, and London, 1981, p. 184].
 
Think about it: What T. D. Lee discovered was that real 'energy' was asymmetric and thus 'virtual' and therefore nonobservable in form and substance. Energy only becomes symmetric and thus observable in our dimension when it becomes 'observable' as 'charge.' Again, quoting Tom Bearden, " Any charge is also a dipole, since it polarizes its surrounding virtual state vacuum with opposite charge. Then it takes (absorbs) virtual state EM energy from that seething virtual state vacuum medium, and re-emits it as real, observable EM energy (real photons) in all directions."
 
Again, T. D. Lee explains: "Since nonobservables imply symmetry, any discovery of asymmetry must imply some observable. The experiment of Wu, Ambler, Hayward, Hoppes and Hudson. established the asymmetry between the positive and negative signs of electricity." [T. D. Lee, Symmetries, Asymmetries, and the World of Particles, U. Wash. Press, Seattle, 1988, p. 11]. And also clarifies: ".the violation of symmetry arises whenever what was thought to be a non-observable turns out to be [now] actually an observable." [T. D. Lee, Particle Physics and Introduction to Field Theory, Harwood Academy Publishers, Chur, New York, and London, 1981, p. 181].
 
Thus we now know that, the vacuum can indeed be "engineered" to form energy structures and dynamics, by forming those energy structures as dynamic forces in matter, then removing the interacting matter.
 
In the 50 years since the discovery of broken symmetry and the award of the Nobel Prize to Lee and Yang for having predicted this great revolution in physics, the implications of broken symmetry of the source dipolarity inside the electrical power generator has not made it across the university campus from the physics department to the EE department. Most EEs still do not understand the difference between symmetry and asymmetry. As Nobelist Lee points out, when you have a broken symmetry you have the case where something virtual has become observable. In short, the broken symmetry of the source dipole (separated opposite charges) inside every generator and battery already freely absorbs virtual energy from the seething vacuum, integrates it coherently to quantum level, and remits the energy as real, observable EM energy. So any "source" dipolarity - including any "isolated" charge and its associated vacuum polarization - unceasingly pours out real, usable EM energy in the form of observable photons. 
 
And it extracts all that energy directly from its virtual state vacuum interaction. All charges and dipoles in the universe do this, and they have done it since their creation some 14 or so billion years ago. Once formed, if the source dipole is left alone and intact, and not destroyed, it will continue to pour out real, free, usable EM energy till the end of time.
 
The reality is that, there is no "energy" crisis and there never has been. There is an "energy from fuel" crisis because our electrical engineers deliberately use only symmetrical interception and collection circuits that destroy their source dipoles (and their free flow of energy from the vacuum) faster than they use some of it to power the loads. So we have to keep consuming fuel etc., in order to keep restoring the dipole (- and +). There is a fuel crisis hence there is an "energy from fuel" crisis!
 
That is why we have to keep cranking the shaft of the generator - not to power the grid and the loads, but to keep restoring the source dipolarity (- and +) inside the generator, that the completely inane symmetrical systems built by our EEs continually destroy faster than they power their loads.
 
Tom Bearden to be continued...
 
Research:
 
Tom Bearden
http://www.cheniere.org/ 
http://www.cheniere.org/toc.html 
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Site:LRP:Motionless_Electromagnetic_Generator
 
Perendev
http://www.perendev-power.com/index.htm
 
My Own Personal Research Pages
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Member:Leslie_R._Pastor

no shit !

klaus3-519x640-1

U.S. military actually made a zombie apocalypse training manual

By Lewis Parker on  
wUioGa4.jpg (1024×683)
If the U.S. is ever attacked by evil magic zombies, or even the relatively tame creature that is a chicken zombie, rest assured that the Department of Defense has it covered.
Seriously, a document has apparently been unearthed by Foreign Policy magazine that appears to show either the incredible level of preparedness of the U.S. national security community, or it demonstrates how the people tasked with keeping the nation safe are insane.
The zombie attack training manual, "CONOP 8888," or "Counter Zombie Dominance," is dated April 2011, and was supposedly found buried on a secret military computer. It tells military planners how to defeat an invasion of flesh eaters, and how to preserve the sanctity of “non-zombie life.” From magic zombies to chicken zombies, even vegetarian zombies, they’re all in the file, with a plan for how to take them out. 
“Zombies pose a threat to all non-zombie human life,” says CONOP8888. “[Strategic Command] will be prepared to preserve the sanctity of human life and conduct operations in support of any human population—including traditional adversaries.”
While the manual says in its disclaimer that "this plan was not acutally designed as a joke," it still kind of is. What the intelligence community has done here is use "zombie" as a kind of codeword for “enemy,” so as not to look like the Pentagon is planning for an invasion of a particular country, religion, or plague.
To prepare for all possible situations, it says, “We elected to use a completely-impossible scenario that could never be mistaken for a real plan."
All of which begs the question, of course, if zombies are being used as metaphors for real threats, what the hell are “Vegetarian zombies” doing in there?
Chicken zombies could, of course, mean avian bird flu, and evil magic zombies could easily be a thinly veiled reference to Al’ Qaeda or some other real enemy. But there can be no such thing as a vegetarian zombie. And second, what threat do vegetarians pose, either in this universe or the one inhabited by the person who wrote this manual?
In fact, according to the military zombie survival guide, vegetarian zombies “pose no direct threat to humans because they only eat plant life,” which makes makes total sense.
Perhaps most remarkable about Counter Zombie Dominance manual is that former Vice President Dick Cheney doesn’t appear once. Not once. Or is he the Evil Magic Zombie? AAAARGH!
Read the full zombie apocalypse training manual below:

Photo via Grmisiti/Flickr (CC BY 2.0)

Nikola Tesla: Calling All Freethinkers!

Rand Clifford
Activist Post

Humanity’s horizons glowed from the brilliance of Nikola Tesla. But to our horrible misfortune, the glow was much too bright for the Power Status Quo (PSQ). Money means power, and Tesla cost tycoons a lot of money by slaying with alternating current (AC) the dead-end direct current (DC) power distribution system of Thomas Edison (financed by J.P Morgan). More than forty of Tesla’s patents from 1888 cover the entire system of “polyphase” AC that, virtually unchanged, powers civilization to this day—a monumental lifetime achievement for any man.

But polyphase AC didn’t lead directly to the PSQ’s campaign of erasing Tesla from history. It was “Tesla’s Coil”, key to unlocking “Aether” and harnessing “Radiant Electricity”. The ultimate forbidden technology, Aether and Radiant Electricity was a primary focus of Tesla’s last forty years on Earth.

By tapping the Aether, by touching “...the wheelwork of nature”, Tesla illuminated visions of humanity freed from domination by the likes of Rothschild, Morgan, Rockefeller...the entire global tyranny machine powered largely by fossil energy, private central banking, war.

One man found an antidote for pathocracy, humanity’s premier poison. [1] His name was Nikola Tesla; that remains one of the few things about the man that has not been altered by the PSQ. The name survives, but little else about Tesla has not been violated. His crime, or “sin” was competition tycoons couldn’t control.

Tesla always knew he would triumph. In his own words, regarding tycoons such as J.P. Morgan:
I am unwilling to accord to some small-minded and jealous individuals the satisfaction of having thwarted my efforts. These men are to me nothing more than microbes of a nasty disease. My project was retarded by laws of nature. The world was not prepared for it. It was too far ahead of time, but the same laws will prevail in the end and make it a triumphal success.
Tesla’s “...triumphal success” has the power to unwind tyranny. All we need is for enough humans to awaken from the PSQ’s spell. Tesla obviously thought awakening was possible even while insisting that, “No free energy device will ever be allowed to reach the market.” Tesla knew that mass awakening was the wildcard. If we let him down, we let humanity down.

Tycoons throw enormous wealth at protecting people from reality by keeping them asleep. But waking up is free, the only ticket to freedom of development of the human potential.


Freedom...a gorgeous concept increasingly hollowed-out by the PSQ. Try to imagine what humanity might achieve without being kicked in the face by the psychopathic elite.

George Orwell said in his novel, 1984, “If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever.”

If we have any chance at proving Orwell wrong, Tesla might be our best hope. So he gets the boot. But they haven’t stamped out Tesla’s spirit. His ultimate technology is still alive not only in Black-Ops, but in laboratories of valiant researchers cheating death-by-truth.

The PSQ’s perpetual fouling of Tesla accents his elevation of what it means to be human. That most salient testament to Tesla’s brilliance, his suppression by the PSQ—it’s all around us, hidden in plain sight.

Style of the PSQ exhibits fear of people thinking for themselves. As long as pockets of human intelligence resist brainwashing, and independent thoughts fly around uncontrolled, that means the PSQ’s choke hold on power is not “safe”. Similar alarm flourished in America’s top Rothschild agent, J.P. Morgan. [2] He knew monopolistic fortunes were not safe with Tesla a funded free spirit. Morgan and other tycoons stung by the “War of the Currents” [3] went into a defensive blitz. And when Tesla denied Morgan control of Radiant Electricity, Morgan had Tesla’s laboratories burned down. Works of genius were destroyed, but not the man. Morgan also instructed the four publishers of school textbooks to never mention Nikola Tesla; ditto for the Smithsonian—Nikola Tesla was an unperson. Morgan stamped like a professional on truth about Tesla. And the money boot keeps stamping with help from public ignorance, fear of the unknown, trust in “authority”....

Creativity...humans working outside “the box”—writers, inventors, scientists and researchers and free spirits soaring above dogma embody what the PSQ fears in humanity. Nikola Tesla is a stellar example of what the PSQ fears most.

Tesla revered nature, not money. That got Tesla the electrical wizard off to a bad start with the PSQ—a moral eminence compounded by Tesla’s public declaration: “Science is but a perversion of itself unless it has as its ultimate goal the betterment of humanity.”

Those were fighting words to the tycoons—especially the part about, “...betterment of humanity.” Tycoons seek “arrested human development”, conspire to fit humanity with cement overshoes. Tesla’s treasures remain difficult to fathom with the PSQ so good at not only mangling and suppressing them, but misrepresenting many as works of Edison, Marconi and others.

On his deathbed, Edison said his biggest mistake had been in trying to develop direct current, rather than the superior alternating current system that Tesla had put within his grasp.

Tesla’s reply about Marconi’s work in radio: “Marconi is a good fellow. Let him continue. He is using 17 of my patents.”

If Tesla doesn’t terrify the PSQ, why their obsession with polluting his accomplishments? Why did they ban Tesla in textbooks and at the Smithsonian, choke off his funding and conjure him into a bogeyman?

Standard indoctrination coddles third graders along in this video of an “Awesome! ‘Tesla Coil’” (don’t miss Alex Jones growling in the wings). [4]

Here’s an encouraging story of spunky third graders with a great teacher, and their letter-writing campaign focused on getting Tesla acknowledged in the Smithsonian. [5]

Among Tesla’s most noble contributions to humanity and the cause of freedom...his intimate disclosure of PSQ’s will to protect their power at the complete disregard of humanity. Tesla revealed what it means to be psychopathic, and elite, showing humanity what inhumanity we are up against. Destruction of competition is a martial situation where, as the PSQ likes to frame it: “No options are off the table”.

The Internet has made progress against common public sentiment regarding Tesla being derivatives of: “I heard Tesla was kind of a crackpot.” Big money manipulates this idea from off in the wings, but when it comes to truth about Tesla, austerity takes center stage.

A nurtured “...then how come?” variety of popular ignorance clings to the idea: “If Tesla was so great, then how come we’re not utilizing his so-called ultimate technology?” The PSQ religiously stamping out competition is “how come”. And once again, when it comes to protecting their monopolies, “...nothing is off the table”.

Accurate information about Tesla still haunts the Internet. People can even learn about Eric Dollard. [6] But the PSQ’s “Internet problem” seems merely a speed bump, considering the PSQ’s record of successfully controlling whatever they want to control, if given enough time. Where would the PSQ be without it’s enablers, us?

A great quote from Eric Dollard:
Tesla scared the central bankers senseless. They knew what his plan meant. Energy independence meant an almost complete loss of control of the people.
Tesla fought in the trenches, pulling back curtains on the PSQ—on humanity versus tyranny, freedom versus slavery. Profit from death and destruction—perpetual war fueled by fossil energy. Private central banking’s “...continuous consolidation of wealth and power into higher, tighter and righter hands” (GHW Bush quote). Continuous consolidation of wealth in the fewest hands drives debt slavery, genocide, looting of the future, the “New World Order”.

“If we don’t exploit every resource with alacrity and no mercy, our competitors will”—that’s the apparent creed of the PSQ. Sugary platitudes regarding people yet to be born seem vulgar in light of the PSQ twisting future generations into competitors. First come, first served. A penny stolen is a penny earned.

Imagine “free” energy.

Imagine no contrived shortages and price gouging. No ”gas” tanks, power lines, meters, power bills, wars for oil and pipeline routes, Alberta tar and Keystone XL kinds of high-pressure DilBit arteries of death—imagine some of the PSQ’s worst nightmares. Toss in no climate-changing hydrocarbon pollution, no more churning out mountains of radioactive waste to attack the human genome for thousands of generations, no psychopathic domination by an invisible elite controlling what billions of people need to survive. Imagine modern warfare obsolete. [7] Tesla offered salvation from survival of the wickedest.

The wicked panicked....

Truth is the antidote for diseased wealth and propaganda smothering and mangling the best of Tesla. A rare step in the right direction would be millions of people realizing that Tesla really did not dedicate the second half of his life to making bigger and ever-more-“Awesome!” sparks—but rather, he was absolutely dedicated to freedom of humanity. Tesla’s greatest invention being reduced to a toy for “...entertainment and educational displays”—that’s very potent PSQ mind venom. They even tagged Tesla the “God of Lightning”. Can’t beat lightning for “Awesome!” sparks. Can’t beat the PSQ for...perhaps W.C. Fields said it best: “There comes a time in the affairs of man, when we must take the bull by the tail, and face the situation.” The “bull” in this case is the PSQ; the situation is what blasts from under the bull’s tail to foul humanity, and our nest.

Do we still have, if we ever did have, the mettle to wake up and rub the PSQ’s nose in their foulness? The stakes have never been higher.

The Sin of Competition

A quote variously attributed to both J.D. Rockefeller and J.P. Morgan set the stage for maniacal fouling of Tesla: “Competition is a sin.” [8]

Chutzpah of these two “tycoons’” implies that monopoly is divine—especially monopoly on energy, money, food, fresh water, and war; a “royal flush” in this Earthly game of poker.

Consider our nightmare of perpetual war in terms of this quote from Aldous Huxley, author of the novel, Brave New World:
The propagandist's purpose is to make one set of people forget that certain other sets of people are human.
Lies are the foundation of the PSQ’s reaction to Nikola Tesla. It’s paramount to humanity that freethinkers survive the elite and witness epiphany of this wisdom from Buddha:
The lie tastes sweet at the beginning, but bitter at the end. The truth tastes bitter at the beginning, but sweet at the end.
“Tesla’s Coil” Versus “The Tesla Coil”

The jungle of confusion and suppression of Tesla’s masterpiece might be easier to navigate if we distinguish between “Tesla’s Coil”, and the “Tesla Coil”. The former could be the epitome of human invention, the latter is its neutered caricature. For elaboration on this distinction, let’s check in with Zionist propaganda, the richest kind.

Wikipedia is hailed by Zionist Israel as “...the major source of information in the world.” They even advertise, with standard Zionist chutzpah, that Wikipedia is “...under constant, paid review of Zionist assets.” [9]

Below is Wikipedia’s first three paragraphs (underlining added) for their listing: “Tesla Coil” (as opposed to “Tesla’s Coil”):
A Tesla coil is an electrical resonant transformer circuit invented by Nikola Tesla around 1891. It is used to produce high-voltage, low-current, high frequency alternating-current electricity. 
Tesla coils can produce higher voltages than other artificial sources of high-voltage discharges, electrostatic machines. Tesla experimented with a number of different configurations consisting of two, or sometimes three, coupled resonant electric circuits. 
Tesla used these coils to conduct innovative experiments in electrical lighting, phosphorescence, x-ray generation, high frequency alternating current phenomena, electrotherapy, and the transmission of electrical energy without wires. Tesla coil circuits were used commercially in sparkgap radio transmitters for wireless telegraphy until the 1920s, and in pseudomedical equipment such as electrotherapy and violet ray devices. Today their main use is for entertainment and educational displays.
Please note the use of “high-voltage, low-current, high frequency alternating-current electricity”, and, “high frequency alternating current phenomena”, topped off with, “Today their main use is for entertainment and educational displays.” In terms of what Tesla actually achieved—in terms of transcendent capabilities of “Tesla’s Coil”, Wikipedia’s “Tesla Coil” definition could not be more misleading if Wikipedia’s goal was to mislead.

Smell a rat? Tesla has offered to show us that rats don’t always win.

Regarding Wikipedia’s, “Today their main use is for entertainment and educational displays”...this is a naked example of Wikipedia’s Zionist-propaganda roots, and propagation of twisted truth.

Frank Zappa characterized America’s educational system as a mechanism designed to create “...functional ignorance.”

Disguised as an educational system, America’s youth indoctrination system also gets a nod in Wikipedia’s line about the “Tesla Coil” being for “...entertainment and educational displays”.

Entertainment, surely, but educational? Entertainment and indoctrination are more accurate here; the “Tesla Coil” is hailed while “Tesla’s Coil” is...what, “conspiracy theory”?

We suffer severe multi-generational distress when “education” is largely indoctrination aimed at inhibiting independent thinking. Students memorize dogma sanctioned by the PSQ so they can pass standardized tests sanctioned by the PSQ. Students learning to think for themselves, learning how to distinguish truth from dogma—this will not do. The PSQ wants young minds regurgitating hive thinking in preparation for becoming obedient workers in thrall of authority, wingless and weighed-down by leaden dogma planted in their minds by PSQ ovipositors.

Tesla’s “Wheelwork of Nature”

While the primary function of the contrived “Tesla Coil” is to disengage Tesla’s masterpiece from reality, the primary function of “Tesla’s Coil” is to disengage voltage from current—disengage “the true electricity” (Aether) from the flow of massive electrons. Only when zero current is achieved in “Tesla’s Coil” will Aether flow freely and the “Tesla Effect” be realized. Any flow of electrons chokes off the Aether. It’s no coincidence that the awesome-spark-toy “Tesla Coil” has popularly replaced “Tesla’s Coil” to choke off Tesla’s threat to the PSQ.

Tesla’s inspiration regarding the decoupling of voltage and current grew during his brief employment by Thomas Edison.

Edison’s DC power distribution system was so inefficient that power-line resistance would cause voltage to fade within several city blocks. Voltage was cranked up very high at the main generators, and “pumping stations” were required every half mile to boost sagging voltage and current.

When a main switch was thrown to hit transmission lines with cranked-up voltage right off the main generators, a blast of blue and purple spikes and stinging, shocking sensations radiated in all directions from the transmission lines before electrons (current) flowed in the lines. This instantaneous phenomenon actually killed some linesmen. Engineers considered these bursts of magnified electrostatic potential a nuisance to be eliminated. Tesla saw them as a powerful, mysterious form of energy to be explored.

In Part Two:

— Tesla and the Earth (his laboratory)
“Tesla’s Coil” (the real thing)
— The “Tesla Effect”
— Aether’s “whitefire” fountains and “mass-free cold electricity”
— Wardenclyffe without propaganda
— Tesla allowed a cameo appearance in the Smithsonian
— Eric Dollard’s eight destroyed laboratories, and why a most profound and honorable way to help humanity, Earth, and generations to come is also the most dangerous

References:

[1] http://www.ponerology.com/evil_2b.html
[2] https://www.google.com/search?q=J.P.+Morgan+Rothschild+agent&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
[3] https://www.google.com/search?q=%22war+of+the+currents%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
[4] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6iGXBZuVPQ
[5] http://www.think-aboutit.com/Misc/nikola_tesla.htm
[6] http://www.jinnwe.com/quest.php?id=1002
[7] http://www.cheniere.org/books/part1/starting%20pages.htm
[8] https://www.google.com/search?q=quote%3A+competition+is+a+sin+JP+Morgan&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a
[9] http://www.ascertainthetruth.com/att/index.php/the-media/who-controls-the-media/429-zionist-control-of-wikipedia

PART 2

PART 3

RELATED ACTIVIST POST ARTICLE:
The 10 Inventions of Nikola Tesla That Changed The World

Rand Clifford lives in Spokane, Washington. His novels, CASTLING, TIMING, Priest Lake Cathedral, and many earlier essays are published by StarChief Press. Contact for Rand Clifford: randoc@live.com

USDA fast becoming extremist paramilitary group with bid for ballistic body armor, trauma plates

naturalnews.com

Originally published May 16 2014
USDA

USDA fast becoming extremist paramilitary group with bid for ballistic body armor, trauma plates

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) The federal agency responsible for certifying foods as organic is on a paramilitary extremist splurge, bidding on automatic submachine guns (see yesterday's article for proof) with night sights and 30-round magazines.

Now, Breitbart journalist AWR Hawkins has uncovered yet another solicitation by the USDA for military gear: Solicitation Number USDAOIGVEST-5-7-14 requests, "ballistic vests, compliant with NIJ 0101.06 for Level IIIA Ballistic Resistance of body armor" with "trauma plate/pad (hard or soft), concealable carrier, tactical vest" and other accessories.

Click here to see the USDA purchase bid for yourself.

This ballistic body armor, when combined with the submachine guns the USDA was already shown to be purchasing, would outfit USDA agents as true paramilitary soldiers on "battlefield USA."

Check out this screen shot of the USDA's bid for ballistic body armor (article continues below):



Federal agencies engage in massive arms race against the American people

The extremist militarization of U.S. federal agencies is happening quietly but aggressively right under the noses of the American people. Just a few generations ago, even the FBI wasn't allowed to carry firearms, but today every agency under the sun seems to think it needs its own private army: EPA, IRS, BLM, DEA, ATF and now even the USDA.

What's especially concerning about this is that none of these agencies fight foreign wars for America. They engage in domestic action against Americans, not foreign enemies. Thus, this build-up of automatic weapons, ballistic body armor and the military "tanks" being increasingly purchased by police departments is an alarming indication that the U.S. government increasingly anticipates engaging in actions of war aimed at the American people.

It is extremely difficult to imagine any legitimate reason why the U.S. Department of Agriculture needs an army of soldiers outfitted with precisely the kind of weapons German Nazi shock troops used in World War II to clear homes of "resistance fighters." That's what submachine guns are for, after all: close-quarters, room-by-room fighting in apartment buildings, office complexes and urban areas. Will the USDA next put out solicitations for grenades and land mines, too?

Who's to stop the USDA from building out its own private military, by the way? That's the alarming state of the nation today, where any federal group can simply form its own paramilitary force without any congressional oversight whatsoever. We are fast entering the era of a government that operates by brute force rather than adhering to the will of the People. We are irrefutably descending into fascism and tyranny as each federal agency arms up with Armored Personnel Carriers, automatic weapons, ballistic body armor and literally billions of rounds of stockpiled ammunition.

I find it fascinating that citizens who purchase firearms and bullets are often derided as being "anti-government." What do we call it, then, when the government stockpiles firearms, body armor and bullets? Anti-citizen? Or are we to seriously believe, as some on the radical left seem to argue, that "only government can be trusted with all the guns?"

Historically, nearly every genocide in human history was carried out by armed governments murdering disarmed civilian populations. In fact, this "democide" is the single largest cause of death in the history of human civilization, resulting in the deaths of at least 262 million people. (SOURCE)

This is how the infrastructure for a police state gets built: quietly and covertly while the masses snooze

That all this is taking place at a time when the federal government is increasingly calling for the mass disarmament of private citizens should unleash alarm bells for anyone who has studied history. WAKE UP, AMERICA, and see what's happening: You are witnessing the deliberate construction of a police state infrastructure which only has one use: to be deployed as force against the American people.

That this same USDA is also operating in collusion with Monsanto and the corrupt, criminally-run biotech industry is doubly alarming. Are we soon going to see a day when farmers who refuse to buy and plant genetically engineered seeds are visited by a paramilitary gang of heavily armed USDA agents who threaten them at gunpoint? It's not mere hyperbole: people like myself who are vocal skeptics of GMOs are routinely hit with death threats and character assassination attempts organized by industry-funded operatives. The next step in our increasingly lawless society is to put guns in their hands and just order the USDA to shoot anyone who isn't pro-GMO.

Again, this isn't an exaggerated description in terms of human history. Many governments deliberately murdered large masses of intellectuals who disagreed with the government. Look up China's Cultural Revolution if you don't believe me... in many cases, anyone wearing glasses was shot on sight under the assumption that they were "academics" and therefore a threat to government power. As this science paper on Academia.edu reveals about the Cultural Revolution and the murder and torture of scientists:

Chairman Mao (1893–1976) and the "Gang of Four" shut down universities, dismantled scientific institutes, and punished intellectuals for elitist, bourgeois inclinations. Millions of scientists and students suffered banishment to the countryside to spend wasted years being re-educated by peasants. [And] ...added to the list of eight evil kinds of people a "stinking ninth category" of intellectuals and scientists. An incredulous Needham cites various atrocities, including torture of scientists.

That's where this is all headed, if you know anything about history, except that the murder and torture will be targeted toward those scientists who don't kow-tow to fascist corporate "science." The centralization of power by government and corporations has NEVER been halted by the choice of those in power. Every institution of power and authority incessantly seeks to expand its importance, its reach and its funding by any means necessary, including, ultimately, mass murder of civilians.

And now, the USDA wants to be in the guns and shooting business. After all, the only reason to buy such automatic weapons is to use them to either shoot somebody or threaten to do so. We are now entering the era of agricultural policy enforced at gunpoint.

This is so far beyond the limits of government set out by the Constitution that it screams for Congressional action to reel in these runaway paramilitary ambitions. Health freedom attorney Jonathan Emord warned about all this in his book, The Rise of Tyranny.

That book warns of how federal agencies have been given carte blanche power to do almost anything they wish -- lawful or otherwise -- with zero oversight by Congress or the voters. History has proven that all organizations will automatically seek power by any means necessary, and the end result, if not stopped by Congress, can only result in the paramilitary radicalization of federal agencies that sooner or later turn their guns on innocent Americans.

Sources for this article include:
http://www.fbo.gov/?s=opportunity&mode=form&...




All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml
Synthetic Biology: Rebranding Extreme Genetic Engineering
By Jaydee Hanson, Senior Policy Analyst
Some years ago, bread companies got the word that customers wanted more fiber in their bread. Instead of making more of their bread with whole grains, a few companies actually put in wood pulp and labeled it as “fiber”. Today, in San Francisco, a group of synthetic biology companies and a representative from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) are holding a meeting called the SynBioBeta Cultured Food Forum about how to market foods and food additives made from extreme forms of genetic engineering as “natural” and “sustainable.”
Whenever you read or hear the term synthetic biology, remember that it is a euphemism for extreme genetic engineering.  This supposedly new technology is really just a similar but more extreme form of the genetic engineering of bacteria, plants and animals that has been going on for the last three decades or more.  Because it is an extreme form of genetic engineering, it should not be subject to more, not less regulation. It is the exact reverse of natural.
If these companies want to produce their products using extreme genetic engineering they should label their products as such and not try to pass them off as “natural” or “sustainable.” I have met many of these genetic engineers in their labs and talked with them about their products. They are good at engineering living organisms, mostly yeasts, bacteria, and algae, so far, but most of them seem to have missed the basic courses in ecology.  Moreover, many of them have contempt for the messiness of nature and think that their genetically engineered products can improve on nature. One of them recently tweeted, “Real nature is not green. Rather, it is beyond control.”
These companies are proud of their products and rather than trying to disguise them as “natural,” should market them as the new genetically engineered products that they are. The companies present at today’s forum represent many of the key players in the field. Evolva is planning to market its synthetic biology version of vanillin this year also and plans to market synthetic biology copies of stevia and saffron flavors. Solazyme is developing a “synthetized in algae” version of cocoa butter, as well as an oil designed to mimic the properties of palm oil.  Amyris, the first company in the field, is already marketing its farnasene oil to a Japanese pharmaceutical company and to the US military as “jet fuel.”  Ginkoworks does not disclose the work that it is doing for various food companies. Intrexon, the genetic engineering company that owns roughly half of the company that has produced the GE salmon, is also participating. Monsanto, DuPont and Ajinomoto are the only “big” biotechnology firms present.  Interestingly, two in-vitro meat companies, Modern Meadow and Sand Hill Foods, are also attending, even though most genetic engineers would not call their work synthetic biology.
These companies should not try to side step regulation and should want to prove themselves through rigorous safety regulations. So far, the few products on the market have used the FDA’s weakest standard: self-affirmed “Generally Regarded As Safe” (GRAS) to put their products on the market. [i] The Principles for the Oversight of Synthetic Biology, a code of conduct for synthetic biology, developed by some 117 organizations around the world, calls on governments to require mandatory synthetic biology specific regulations.  We hope the USDA representative present at today’s industry forum is taking notes on which new regulations need to be developed. These companies do themselves and the public a disservice by trying to side step regulation.  They show contempt for their customers when they try to rebrand what they are doing as “natural”.  If their products were really “natural”, they would not be applying for patents on their new inventions or convening conferences to strategize about deceptive marketing.
*A previous version of this blog said that Grist’s Nathanael Johnson would be participating in this forum as indicated on the agenda. CFS has since learned that Mr. Johnson did not attend.
###
[i] The Center for Food Safety has sued the FDA for failing to issue its final regulations on Generally Regarded As Safe Approvals of foods and food additives.

CFR: Developing an International Framework for Geoengineering


Speakers: M. Granger Morgan, Head, Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University
John D. Steinbruner, Director, Center for International and Security Studies, University of Maryland
Presider: Ruth Greenspan Bell, Acting U.S. Climate Policy Director, World Resources Institute
March 10, 2010
Developing an International Framework for Geoengineering
Via: Alan Watt
UK DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE DOCUMENT
Titled – DCDC Global Strategic Trends Programme 2007-2036
(DCDC) stands for Development, Concepts and Doctrine Centre
This is the DOD Document Alan has spoken about many times in his blurbs and as a guest host. Also, linked below, is the original blurb where Alan does an in-depth talk on pertinent portions of the text.
Download the PDF File (6.11 mb)
LISTEN TO BLURB
• DOCUMENT: Agenda 21
•  Agenda 21 Document
• National Science Foundation / Department Of Commerce-sponsored report – June 2002
“Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance”
“NANOTECHNOLOGY, BIOTECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND COGNITIVE SCIENCE”
(Large .PDF file approx. 7 MB): NBIC 405-page report.
International Technology Research Institute, World Technology (WTEC) Division, Loyola College
“Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology”
NSET Workshop Report – National Science Foundation – March 2001
Logistical, Editing and Management Assistance by:
( .PDF file approx. 3 MB): NSET 280-page report.
• AUDIO – Aldous Huxley: The Ultimate Revolution, March 20, 1962 (Scientific Dictatorship Speech at Berkeley University)
The Speech (MP3 – Listen / Download)
(RealAudio – Listen)
Question and Answer Session (MP3 – Listen / Download)
(RealAudio – Listen)
• TRANSCRIPT - THE MIKE WALLACE INTERVIEW:
ALDOUS HUXLEY – May 18, 1958


Via: Old-Thinker News

Bilderberg 1966 – The Documents

Infowars.com recently obtained leaked documents from Bilderberg 1966, held in Wiesbaden, Germany. The infowars team is urging the alternative media to spread these leaked Bilderberg documents detailing the war on nationalism far and wide. All documents are mirrored here on oldthinkernews.com:
- Basic attendees list for Bilderberg 1966 [PDF]
- Information for 1966 invitees on travel, etc., including Prince Bernhard’s letter, the basic agenda, and an extended attendee list. [PDF]
- Handwritten minutes taken down by Sen. Fred Harris during each 1966 Bilderberg speaker, including repeated statements demonizing nationalism [PDF]
- AGENDA ITEM #1: Should NATO be reorganized and if so how?
Bilderberg policy proposal on reorganizing NATO’s purpose, as per 1966 agenda item #1, written by attendee Robert R. Bowie (United States), followed by background info send to invitees on NATO as well as U.S. Senate Testimony given by Dean Acheson (a prominent member of the Wise Men deeply embedded in Bilderberg, Skull & Bones, etc.) in April 1966, presumably in response to Bilderberg’s proposals. [PDF]
- AGENDA ITEM #2: The future of world economic relations, especially between industrial and developing countries.
Bilderberg policy proposal on world economic development, as per agenda item #2, written by attendee Jan Tinbergen (Netherlands), followed by background information on IMF policies regarding “Compensatory Financing of Export Fluctuations” from 1963, and then by David Rockefeller’s 1965 speech to the International Industrial Conference in San Francisco. [PDF]
‘WE ARE GOD’S GIFT TO MAN’
- A separate file of just David Rockefeller’s 1965 speech to the International Industrial Conference in San Francisco, wherein he concludes by boldly stating “What we are is God’s gift to man; What we become is man’s gift to God.” [PDF]
- Miscelleneous and incomplete documents from both the 1965 and 1967 Bilderberg meetings, including a 1965 attendees list and cover sheets for a 1967 meeting summary document, as well as a cover sheet for a report by Bilderberg’s shadow founder Dr. Joseph Retinger dated April 1962. [PDF]
INFLUENCING SEN. FRED HARRIS
- A series of follow-up letter exchanges between Sen. Fred Harris (whose library these documents emerged from) and individuals including UAW president Walter P. Reuther (a fellow 1966 attendee), Emilio Collado, vice president of Standard Oil & first president of the World Bank, discussing one Dr. Siro Vasquez, a petroleum engineer who worked for Standard Oil and other Rockefeller entities, and finally from Joe Weingarten, inviting Harris to join the World Institute for Peace, an interest closely linked with top Bilderbergers like U.S. organizer Joseph E. Johnson, who then headed the Carnegie Institute for International Peace. [PDF]
Bilderberg 1966 – The Documents

A Chronological History of the New World Order

A Chronological History of The CFR – By Dennis Cuddy (PDF)
chronological-history

Invitation to an Open Conspiracy: The Bartleby Project

Bartleby Project (PDF)

Bush’s New World Order – The Meaning Behind the Words

Bush’s New World Order – The Meaning Behind the Words (PDF)

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

Is The Military-Industrial Complex Invincible?


military-industrial-complex-flag
It was more than half a century ago that the then U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower, in his farewell address to the nation, warned of the growing influence of a phenomenon that still continues to undermine and weaken the bases of American democracy: the military-industrial complex.
The military-industrial complex is a concept denoting a money-spinning and economically beneficial interaction between the war-planners and the arms industry. The government officials set the plans for a new military adventure with the apparent goal of “exporting democracy” to other countries and “liberating” them while the genuine, behind-the-scenes goal is to further some political interests and plunder the natural resources of the target country. On their part, the multinational companies get profitable and lucrative deals for manufacturing weaponry, and the whole process, which ultimately leads to unwarranted killings and irretrievable destructions, undercuts the government’s accountability before the Constitution and the international law.
To get an idea of what the military-industrial complex is, it would be helpful to take a look at the relationship between the legislative bodies of the U.S. federal government, i.e. the bicameral Congress comprised of the Senate and the House of Representatives, the arms manufacturing industry, the interest groups, political lobbies, the multinational organizations and the corporate media.
For a long time, this dreadful complex, which the only army general elected as the U.S. President has worriedly warned about, has imposed additional and unjustifiable costs on the American taxpayers. The U.S. citizens have been bearing the brunt of the government’s warmongering and bloodletting across the globe. It’s noted that the United States, since its independence, has either directly or indirectly taken part in more than 50 wars and military confrontations that have cost the lives of millions of innocent, unarmed civilians. The most recent example is the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which until the complete withdrawal of the U.S. forces in 2011, claimed around 1.5 million lives.
The American citizens, even those who usually approve of the government policies regardless of which party is in power, have always complained about the disproportionate and irrational spending of the successive administrations on militarism and wars. This concern was echoed in President Eisenhower’s farewell address delivered on January 17, 1961 where he stated, “three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.”
The people’s dissatisfaction with the U.S. government’s excessive spending on military projects and arms production has been manifested in different ways; from the millions-strong rallies and demonstrations in several U.S. cities preceding the Iraq War, to the recent Occupy Wall Street movement, which was seminally oriented on economic demands, but subsequently expanded to encompass the people’s political grievances regarding the U.S. foreign policy and its military expeditions in the Middle East. Needless to say the Occupy Wall Street movement, which was a purely democratic and popular uprising, was brutally crushed and suppressed by the U.S. police state, as the prominent lawyer Marjorie Cohn puts it.
However, as the military-industrial complex grows and becomes stronger, the American democracy turns more fragile and unstable. The military-industrial complex has been a serious challenge to the democratic values upon which the Founding Fathers have constructed the U.S. Constitution. As time goes by, the government finds it more difficult to rationalize its imperial, expansionistic and militaristic agenda and justify its war adventures to its people, and once a government ceases to be responsible, accountable and transparent, it would be the starting point of the enfeeblement and evaporation of democracy.
The military-industrial complex wins profits for the arm dealers and traders whose existence and survival is hinged on wars and military confrontations. These contractors control and manipulate the public opinion through their dominance over the mainstream media. The mainstream media rarely run stories that are critical of the war policies of the government, and instead function as the propaganda wing of the state. A notorious example is the joint collaboration by Judith Miller and her colleagues at the New York Times to lay the groundwork for the invasion of Iraq in 2003 by presenting false evidence of the non-existent Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction. The massive media propaganda campaign by the New York Times and other state-controlled newspapers and TV channels in the United States instituted this belief that a war was necessary to prevent Saddam Hussein from going mad and dropping its chemical bombs on the heads of the American citizens. It goes without saying that Saddam Hussein was the very puppet whom the United States and its European allies prodded into attacking Iran in 1980.
Although imperialism and militarism have been two inherent and characteristic features of the U.S. political establishment for a long time, the world has been witness to an extreme growth of the American greed for more wealth and political power in the recent years, especially following the 9/11 attacks that marked the beginning of a new era in the U.S. relations with the international community. The 9/11 attacks, which completely accidentally took place when the hawkish Republican George W. Bush was in power, underpinned the mindset of “either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists” and provided a good justification for invading and attacking the countries which are seen as potential threats to the U.S. national security.
Of course the role of lobbies and interest groups in the unrestrained growth of the military-industrial complex should not be ignored. The Israeli lobby is seen as the most powerful and influential external force in the U.S. political atmosphere and the foremost role-player that alters the major foreign policy decisions took by the White House.
The prominent investigative journalist Wayne Madsen believes that the Israeli lobby owns the White House, Congress, the Democratic and Republican parties and Hollywood. “The Israeli Lobby owns the Congress, media, Hollywood, Wall Street, both political parties, and the White House. This kind of talk will get people fired by this lobby, as we have seen recently with White House correspondent Helen Thomas and CNN anchor Rick Sanchez. However, many Americans are growing tired of the arrogance of the Israel Lobby and their bigoted attitudes toward anyone who challenges their influence-peddling and their ridiculous insistence that Israel must be supported because of some ancient fairy tales involving some tribes who wandered the deserts of the Middle East and saw and heard non-existent things because of sun stroke, drinking bad water, and smoking local hallucinogenic plants,” said Madsen in a December 2010 interview with the Veterans Today news and analysis website.
The military-industrial complex never cares for the morality or decency of the wars in which innocent people are massacred. It simply cares for the dollars that are earned through waging wars. The White House and Pentagon have also shown that they stride on the same path and take action whenever there are chances for winning some financial gains, even if the gain is insignificant and dispensable.
Nevertheless, even though the military-industrial complex seems enormously powerful and prevailing, it’s not invincible. The grassroots movements, the alternative media, progressive, anti-war intellectuals, scholars, authors, journalists and conscious citizens can resist the forces that are driving our world to more wars and unrestricted bloodshed. As Laura Eisenhower, the great granddaughter of the U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower, noted in an interview with “Exopolitics”, unity and consciousness can lead to the collapse of the military industrial complex. So, even a member of the presidential family tells us that what his great grandfather had warned against 53 years ago is not an unbreakable, undefeatable ghoul. It can be brought down.
Kourosh Ziabari is an Iranian Journalist, writer and media correspondent
www.KouroshZiabari.com

FBI releases heavily-censored documents on Sandy Hook massacre

FBI releases heavily-censored documents on Sandy Hook massacre


Wolfgang Halbig, a former state trooper and current school safety consultant, repeatedly has asked entirely reasonable questions about the alleged massacre of 20 students and 6 women at the Sandy Hook Elementary School on Dec. 14, 2012. In his quest for answers, Halbig has even invoked the Freedom of Information Act. (Go here to see his questions.)
To this day, however, Halbig has received no response, not even one, to his questions from local (Newtown) and state (Connecticut) officials, even when he personally posed the questions to the Newtown Board of Education, after traveling thousands of miles from his home in Florida. (See “Citizens confront Newtown Board of Education about Sandy Hook hoax”)
One of Halbig’s questions is:
Why did the FBI classify the Sandy Hook massacre? This has never been done before. Even the Columbine School massacre was not classified information. To this day, the FBI report on Sandy Hook remains classified information, not releasable to the public.
On April 24, 2014, Dave Altimari reports for The Hartford Courant that, in response to a Courant Freedom of Information (FOI) request, the FBI has released about 175 pages of documents from the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre investigation. The Courant submitted its FOI request in January 2014 after Connecticut state police had released its report.
Alas, the documents “released” by the FBI were “heavily blacked-out,” i.e., censored.
Of the 175 pages released, 64 were completely redacted (blacked-out). Of the remaining 111 pages, “most were heavily redacted.” Below is an example:
FBI report on SD
As you can see from the page above, it is nearly devoid of information other than that Adam Lanza allegedly was “a troubled kid” and “interested in Japanese techno music.”
Assuming that the other 110 “heavily-redacted” pages are like the page above, this means that the FBI’s release is almost devoid of information.
The Courant says “The names of all witnesses interviewed by federal agents have been removed and there are no references to attempts by federal authorities in Washington, D.C., to recover information from a computer disk that shooter Adam Lanza destroyed.”
That is most interesting because in the days immediately after the alleged massacre, we were told by the news media that Lanza had smashed the hard-drive of his computer. Despite that, the State of Connecticut’s Final Report on Sandy Hook included detailed descriptions of what the FBI presumably had retrieved from Lanza’s computer — about pedophiles, child porn, serial killers, and hatred toward his grandmother. You name the vile evil, he (allegedly) was into it.
Having been trained in scholarship and research, I prefer to see for myself the primary source instead of rely on a secondary account. But The Courantprovided no link to the FBI documents.
A blog called Sandy Hook Facts & Research claims that “What [Courantreporter] Altimari fails to point out, or intentionally hides, is that the documents that the FBI released to the Courant were the same public record that had already been released in the final report. There was nothing new here; he could have written that article in December; but the Courant wanted to feed the ignorant.”
But Sandy Hook Facts & Research didn’t give a link to the FBI documents either. So I went on the FBI’s website and searched for the elusive Sandy Hook documents but found nothing. The closest is a page on “Shooting Incidents Reports” that contains a report on the Sandy Hook shooting which, as the FBI admits, was not authored by the FBI, but instead is the Connecticut state police’sreport.
In other words, one year five months after the alleged massacre, the FBI still has not released its Sandy Hook report.
The FBI is a bureau within the Justice Department of the Obama administration. On August 21, 2010, Obama grandiloquently declared: ““The only people who don’t want to disclose the truth are people with something to hide.”               tele~pump~terd

Obama Speaks... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypAU28t5Ya0


What about the Sandy Hook massacre is the Obama administration hiding?
Only those who lie and deceive fear the light of day.
For all the posts FOTM has published on the hoax, go to our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.
~Eowyn
Dr. Eowyn’s article first appeared at Fellowship of the Minds.