JOINT RUSSIA-USA PLANNING FOR MANNED MARS MISSION CONTINUES INSPITE OF (OR BECAUSE OF?) EARTH-BOUND GEOPOLITICS ~ looks more & more &More & fucking MORE ? ...that "every~thin" we've been "taught" ..is ... bullshit , Huh ! 
With
the frosty relations between the USA and Russia over the USA-sponsored
fascist coup in Kiev, and the resulting chaos in the eastern Ukraine,
one might think that any major long-range talks of Russo-American space
cooperation would be on hold, but that's not the case at all according
to this article from Russia's Sputnik magazine from March of this year(shared by Mr. M.D.):
Russia, US to Jointly Prepare Mars, Moon Flight Road Map
When I read this article, I repeatedly asked myself why these two
nations - recently at such loggerheads - could even be contemplating any
sort of joint coordination of their national space programs (much less
the possibility of joint missions) as is indicate in the following
paragraphs:
"Russia and the United States will work together on a
roadmap to send humans to Mars and the Moon, according to NASA
Administrator Charles Bolden. The Russian Federal Space Agency Roscosmos
and its US counterpart NASA will jointly hammer out a "road map"
program on flights to Mars and the Moon, NASA Administrator Charles
Bolden said on Saturday.
"Bolden, who is currently on a tour of Russia's Baikonur cosmodrome
in Kazakhstan, added that he had discussed joint efforts to send
missions to the Red Planet with Roscosmos head Igor Komarov, including
time frames and funding.
"'Our area of cooperation will be Mars. We are discussing how
best to use the resources, the finance, we are setting time frames and
distributing efforts in order to avoid duplication,' Bolden said." (Emphasis added)
Now, the very idea of "avoiding duplication" falls far short of the
idea of jointly sponsored manned missions, but it is suggestive. The
question for the high octane speculation of the day is "why?" this need
to have such talks amid the tense geopolitical situation? And my answer,
highly speculative though it may be (and it is certainly not a
speculation that exhausts all the possibilities), is that this may be a
signal of a very covert agenda. As most regular readers here are aware,
I am definitely in that camp that thinks there are significant indicators of artificial "stuff" out there on our neighboring celestial bodies. (Recall this blog from 2013: JUST WHAT THE HECK IS GOING ON WITH MARS, ANYWAY?)
And it's that possibility of "stuff" out there, especially on Mars,
that may be the hidden story here, for the USA may be trying to bring
Russia into the Mars exploration-and-disclosure game in order to
exercise influence over whatever "stuff", if any, they might find, and
eventually, thus be able to influence the precise way that it might be
disclosed should they confirm any "stuff" really is there.
And if that's the case, then it will be interesting to see how the
other space-faring powers - China, India, Japan, Europe(i.e. Germany) -
respond. It is indeed a notable fact that the European Space Agency,
along with NASA, has been releasing some rather stunning pictures from
Darmstadt, not only from the Red Planet, but from other celestial bodies
recently, and doing so without much comment, almost as if a
kind of limited hangout position was being put into place. And China of
course released some odd pictures from the Moon(and released them in a
very odd way on the People's Liberation Army website, to boot), and again, without much comment.
So the bottom line for me here is that there is something definitely
going on with this NASA-Russia space consultation, and we can bet our
bottom dollar that we're not being told the whole story. I suspect
strongly that that story includes whatever pictures of Mars the Russians
may have locked up in their archives, and, by careful comparison
between those and current returns from the Red Planet, that quite a lot
of behind the scenes discussion is being had on where a manned mission
should land, the best to confirm, or deny, that there may be "stuff".
And if there is "stuff", how best to handle and release the information.
NASA CUTS VIDEO FEED FROM INTERNATIONAL SPACE STATION AS “UFOs” CAUGHT LEAVING EARTH ~ hehe looks like maybe there is some"1" else ...round here ?
So many people sent me versions of this article that I had to blog about it.
But first, a little context. Do you recall that now famous (or,
depending on your lights, infamous) video shot from the Space Shuttle in
the now world-famous NTS-48 video? In that video, one saw several
bright white "dots" moving in an intricate pattern, one is almost
tempted to say in a "formation" of some sort, and then, dramatically,
one of the "dots" that was moving along the LIM line executed a sudden
and very acute turn of about 100+ degrees, accelerated abruptly, and
went shooting out into space as a "shot" seemed to stream up from the
Earth, aimed at where the dot had been before it executed its maneuver, a
feat which suggested to many, including yours truly, that it was under
some sort of intelligent control(as was the "shot" from the Earth). The
fun then began, as many jumped on the video as "absolute proof" of the
presence of ETs, and as NASA rushed to assure us that what we were
looking at was merely ice particles from a water dump from the shuttle
itself. That lasted until Dr. Jack Kasher of the University of Nebraska
did a photo analysis of the whole video, and promptly denounced the "ice
particle" theory. However, for some of us - myself included - the video
wasn't so much about "ET" as about the possibility that we may have
been given - either deliberately or inadvertently - a glimpse into some
possible hidden technologies, both of a weapons nature, and of a
propulsion nature, for as fast as the little "dot" darts away in the NTS
48 video at a very nimble couple of hundred thousand miles per
hour(according to some estimates), it still wasn't "fast enough" to get
from "interstellar there" to "here", all of which suggested not so much
ETs, as hidden possibilities.
Well...maybe.
But now there's this little video making the rounds on the internet,
of yet another set of "dots" seemingly flying up from the Earth and
cruising leisurely on into space:
WATCH: NASA cuts live video transmission as THREE UFOs fly past Earth
So what's my high octane speculation of the day? Well, let's assume
we're looking at "something" and not just "dots" and let's assume this
video is real and not yet another internet hoax. In which case, the dots
don't appear to be candidates for the "ice particles from a water dump
at the International Space Station" explanation, since they seem to be
moving at slightly different speeds and in slightly different
directions. Let's assume further that they may be a technology of some
sort, and since they're chugging along at stellar pony-express speed,
that they're secret American technologies (or someone else's). What
interests me, in the light of these assumptions, is not so much anything
that we might speculate about hidden technologies or propulsion systems
and what have you, but rather, the fact that they were observed by the
ISS, which means that whatever they are, at least the Russians know
about the dots too, and this might indicate that either they know what
they are, or that NASA knows what they are, and pulled the feed for
possible security reasons. The ISS, in other words, is a perfect
platform, in a certain sense, for the internationalization of the UFO issue and for a coordination of policy concerning such incidents. Houston to Baikonur on secure channel: "Did you see that?" Baikonur to Houston on the same channel: "Yes we saw it."
And that takes us back to yesterday's blog about those Russo-American
space cooperation talks regarding Mars... and whatever "stuff", if any,
might be there. If they're having such talks, rest assured they're
talking about whatever it is that videos like this occasionally capture.
The real fun for high octane speculation purposes begins when you
imagine the following conversation: Baikonur "It's not ours, is it
yours?" Houston: "No, it's not ours either. And if it's not ours, and
it's not yours, and if we're both telling the truth, then - " (Both
togther) "whose is it?" Calls to London, Berlin, Tokyo, and Beijing
don't turn up any answers either.
Posts
