Thursday, February 11, 2016

MONKEY WRENCH: THE EXPERIMENT IS OVER

3431625a-8a86-4be1-92f9-bf49e4399f02

MONKEY WRENCH

THE EXPERIMENT IS OVER

I am always in awe of what I am seeing in the new X-Files. Even though there have been a tremendous amount of monster investigations that both Mulder and Scully are investigating, there has to be a satisfying ending to the six episode return. I am thinking what it all leads to is beyond what scientists call, evolution.
In my book, “Riding the Shock Wave,” I come to some bizarre conclusions that shatter some of the accepted views on creation, common descent and evolution. While I have made it clear that I believe God is not a magician, I can say God is an omnipotent scientist and whether it sounds alien or not the god we worship and all gods who dwell in the sky are extra-terrestrial. There is the one true God the people of Earth revere, however, many debate on how define this god. They argue over his name, and in some cases, do not dare to mention it.
However, there are basic allegories that have been given to us by a lot of the myth makers, prophets and writers of our time that may in fact, know more than they care to reveal.
Many reveal things through fiction, and that fiction becomes part of the predictive programming process and the revelation of the method becomes commonly accepted truth in the zeitgeist.
Using a science fiction metaphor from the mind of Arthur C. Clarke, we see a humming, mysterious monolithic stone slab, a technological machine belonging to aliens in space, one of hundreds of such monoliths sent to Earth to test, teach and transform the apes into higher-order, intelligent beings. Once the ape touches the slab, his mental awareness increases.
mon
Later that day, this leader of the apes discovers he can use dried bones as weapons. The “enlightened” apes gain domination in the animal world, establish their territorial domain, and take an evolutionary step or leap toward being more like humans – a process where the message was sent from a higher intelligence and was received causing change in the mind of that which the “God Power” influenced. The “Monolithic God” gives the primitive hominid the knowledge to create weapons and tools, tools he uses to create similar monoliths in order to meet his “maker.”
However, it has also been recorded that when man had made monoliths in order to get closer to the Gods, the Gods became angry and came down to destroy the buildings he made. Once again, extra- terrestrial forces wreak havoc on mankind’s progress and wipes out a civilization.
We all know of the interventions spoken of in the Bible; however, no one really knows a history that may come before the Cambrian, Pre-Cambrian or even Jurassic eras. Movies like Prometheus give us tales of aliens that were part of the engineering of the human species, some 200,000 years ago, with a few of them offering up their lives so the components of the their DNA could be used in ancient ritualistic panspermia.
Alien intervention and the possibilities of ancient aliens is now a hot topic for history buffs to report. The alien questions have been raised from the times of the early establishment of the Catholic Church to now and the images of these beings can be seen in ancient tablets and on the walls of the various ancient structures.
glorificação-da-eucaristia
In some places on the planet, we can look on the sides of caves and the walls of rock. These cave markings show a different look for these gods. Many with halos of light, large eyes and in some cases protective coverings for the head and the body that today are worn by people in religious respect.
Religion itself has created fictional imagery of God or the gods. We only see gods in robes standing amongst the marble columns. It is imagery given to us from the Roman and the Greek.
The human race has a rich cosmic history and mankind will hopefully find itself at a place in time where that cosmic history will have to be honored in order for us to understand what the real purpose of our existence is.
Most of us have found purpose through various religious beliefs and practices. However, digging deeper beyond the mainstream dogma is hidden history, truth that somehow is escaping us in this time. It is vital we have a hint or a clue about what is in store for the planet, cosmically.
All of these ancient civilizations had knowledge of what was out there in the stars. They communed with what they called, Gods, and had written about travelers that moved across the sky and came down to speak with mankind.
mardukrelief
They also spoke of creation and how the Earth was like a vast garden planted by the Gods and we were the fruits of their labors. It has been speculated for quite some time that mankind did not have its beginning here on Earth.
Many other ancient creation stories claim that mankind’s beginning happened on another planet, perhaps Mars or some other unknown planet yet to be discovered by our scientists.
It has been written by the Sumerians that the first man came from the planet Nibiru, while etymology of the first man, Adam indicates that he may have been formed elsewhere. He was the product of either star dust or red dirt or mud from another planet, perhaps Mars.
The Hebrew name for man is pronounced “aw-dawm.” The name, Adam, came from that and is also related to the Hebrew, “o aw-dawm-ah,” which means man of red clay or red Earth. According to the Old Testament, a group of gods planted a garden eastward in Eden and a man-made from red clay was created to tend the garden that was seeded by these Gods.
There have been authors who have written that the entire creation was the aftermath of an exodus from Mars or some other planet and the way the Earth was seeded with life is through a bombardment of comets and meteors that carried the building blocks for life. These celestial bodies were actually launched from this unknown planet for Earth.
We all know of a spiritual side to our existence, but for clarity’s sake, let’s stick to the physical part of our sudden appearance on Earth as a species some 180,000 to 250,000 years ago.
I say “sudden” because we’ve not really undergone dramatic physical evolutionary changes since then, which makes it hard for us all to comprehend the idea that evolution is slowly taking place and we are destined to become something more than human.
However, there are some scientists that are saying in our time, this whole evolution process has ended. They surmise that when it comes to human evolution or natural selection – this is as good as it gets.
There is a commonality that lessens the blow to creationists who are staunch non-believers in evolution and that is the idea of common descent that all living creatures on Earth share a common, remote ancestor and the “Sixth Extinction,” where mankind has stopped natural selection by its own free will.
sixth_mass_extinction
In our biblical teachings we are told in Genesis that God declared everything He had created was “very good,” and we can reasonably assume that prior to their fall, Adam and Eve were perfect in body and mind. They were, in fact, created to live forever since death had not yet entered God’s creation.
However, after fall at the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, God cursed the ground and, thereafter, Adam and Eve became mortals — before they could not die, and they were then commended to multiply their seed – from there we can somehow surmise we descended from one common ancestor, of which became aware that it was important to maintain the species.
It is obvious God didn’t create everything at once and the original models of human and animal were obviously in need of upgrades for survival. This would require knowledge, something that arguably would have had to be less primitive and more advanced.
Then we read, “Be fruitful and multiply; fill the earth and subdue it; have dominion over the fish of the sea, over the birds of the air, and over every living thing that moves on the Earth.”
I believe this was the creator saying that populating the Earth will help with the development of resources and the next phase of “industrialization” will have to come with higher intelligence.
Five hundred years after the creation of Adam – Jubal a descendant of Cain had developed the harp and the flute while his half-brother, Tubal-Cain, had developed bronze and iron.
The_Phillip_Medhurst_Picture_Torah_42._Tubal-cain's_bronze_and_iron._Genesis_cap_4_v_22._De_Vos
I am sure people really can’t comprehend the idea of how the Bible indicates how man in the times of Genesis had advanced knowledge of chemistry. The making of iron required that a certain ore had to be extracted, then mixed with a specific mineral and heated to extremely high temperatures.
Bronze of course, requires less heat but the chemistry is more complicated. This was not accomplished through evolutionary accidents. These half-brothers or even Adam himself had to have been taught this chemistry from a higher intelligence.
You can call that higher intelligence God, or your mind can trail off into Ancient Alien theories – either way, you have to wonder how these antediluvian men possessed such intelligence.
Today, we are hearing from militant environmentalists and climate change believers that it is industrialization that has put us in the environmental predicament we are in today. Industrialization was the right and natural thing for man to accomplish as it has helped in our survival and our comfort.
However, the abuses of industry have made its mark on the planet and our responsibility for healthy creation has also been neglected. Many use the excuse of dominion and how man dominates the king of the food chain.
We forget there is a responsibility that comes with the idea of dominion and even though the animals are ours to use and eat, and the plants are there for our consumption, we should not be messing with them.
Today, science tells us we are all at fault for the decline in life and health. However, science is not looking into its contribution to the mess and decline that we are seeing in this world.
Everything is indicating there has been a monkey wrench thrown into our evolution and the experiment of mankind being the caretaker of planet Earth is expiring.
Much has been said recently about racial diversity and the idea through ethno-engineering and multicultural programming, we will somehow wake up and decide that we can all get along. However, biodiversity is a topic that is far more important to the planet and our survival.
The scientists’ analysis, published in the open-access journal Science Advances, follows up on more than a decade’s worth of warnings about a rapid loss of global biodiversity. Many experts say the loss has risen to the scale seen during five previous global extinction events — the most recent of which occurred 65 million years ago when the dinosaurs died off.
I have always wondered why we have been so lucky to survive so long as other civilizations have been wiped from the earth. Now we know that little by little we will have to change how we feel about life because we are literally surrounded by death.
The team behind the new study, led by Gerardo Ceballos of the National Autonomous University of Mexico, tried to address such concerns by doubling the commonly cited background rate — going from one species extinction per million species per year to two extinctions. And for the current rate, they turned to a list maintained by the International Union for Conservation of Nature — which they characterized as a conservative accounting.
Gerardo-Ceballos
Based on those figures, the extinction rate since 1900 has been eight to 100 times higher than the expected background rate, the researchers said. “The particularly high losses in the last several decades accentuate the increasing severity of the modern extinction crisis,” they reported.
Many of the causes for biodiversity loss have been traced to industrialization, deforestation and other, less obvious human factors.
Things like resistant bacteria and funguses have killed many species. Since the late 1990s, US scientists have warned us about unprecedented number of fungal and fungal-like diseases, which have recently caused some of the most severe die-offs and extinctions ever witnessed in wild species and which are jeopardizing food security.
Scientists are also saying that the human species itself could eventually fall victim to the sixth extinction.
The sixth extinction is not happening over night and there is no reason to panic, however there is reason to believe that it is underway and that over 50 to 100 years time we may be seeing a deterioration of life expectancy if the environment becomes more toxic.
The toxicity levels in the air, water, and food and are expedient dangers, more so than the phantom menace of climate change.
According to some scientists, our environmental deficit is now beyond nature’s resiliency. The loss of biodiversity is the most urgent of the environmental problems, as biodiversity is critical to ecosystem services and human health. And the main culprit is the modern chemical-intensive industrialized system of food and agriculture.
Our over-reliance on chemicals in agriculture are causing irreparable harm to all beings on this planet. Most of these chemicals are known to cause illness, and they have likely been causing illnesses for many years. But until recently, the herbicides have never been sprayed directly on food crops and never in this massive quantity.
7844-050-71ED9C39
Human disease patterns correlate remarkably well with the rate of glyphosate usage on corn, soy and wheat crops.
Genetically modified organisms or GMOs fit into a wider agenda for depopulating the planet.
We are thwarting the evolutionary growth of human beings and we are halting our common descent my tampering with natural selection. Apart from the Darwinian arguments for or against, another part of natural selection is the idea of maintaining the health and fitness of an existing population.
Clearly, modern medicine and the welfare state have brought an effective end to natural selection – and soon we will have to grapple with the return of eugenics as we proceed with introducing to the gene pool three parent babies, chimeras, clones, and genetically designed children.
We have already been warned about the environmental, social and industrial threat of overpopulation. The solution according to the elite is the removal of a lot of people on the planet.
In May 2009, some of the richest people in the US met at the home of Paul Nurse, a British Nobel prize-winning biochemist and President of Rockefeller University in Manhattan, to discuss ways of tackling a ‘disastrous’ environmental, social and industrial threat of overpopulation. The meeting was hosted by David Rockefeller Jr. These same individuals have met several times since to develop a strategy in which population growth would be tackled.
CANCER RESEARCH
The Rockefeller Foundation was involved in extensive financing of eugenics research in league with some of the US’s most respected scientists from such prestigious universities as Stanford, Yale, Harvard and Princeton. The explicit aim of the eugenics lobby funded by wealthy élite families, such as Rockefeller, Carnegie, Harriman and others since the 1920s, has embodied what they termed, “negative eugenics,” the systematic killing off of “undesired bloodlines.”
The Rockefeller Foundation funded the earliest research on GMOs, the effectiveness of vaccines, and other ways to begin that depopulation plan. There appears to be an intentional or designed increase in Alzheimer’s disease, obesity, breast cancer, esophageal cancer, congenital anomalies and a growing burden of disability, particularly from mental disorders in the United States.
It appears that the plans to depopulate are already underway and all with plausible deniability. If they don’t kill you with chemicals they can make laws keeping you from reproducing which adds to something called, zero population growth.
The recent Zika Virus scare has created a controversy over reproductive rights because the disease is believed to be the leading cause of microcephaly, a birth defect where a baby’s head is smaller than expected when compared to babies of the same sex and age.
The governments of El Salvador and various other Latin American countries, Brazil, Colombia and Ecuador as well as Jamaica, have advised that women hold off on getting pregnant. El Salvador went as far as to urge women to hold back on having children until 2018.
Reproductive rights activists are outraged that the Salvadoran government would make this recommendation in country where women have no legal options to terminate a pregnancy if they are concerned about birth defects.
Salvadoran law “criminalizes abortion on all grounds, including when the mother’s life or health is in danger, and in cases of rape.
However, now this viral epidemic may change a society’s feelings on abortion, which of course is another form of depopulation.
It was a Rubella (German measles) outbreak in the United States that did the same thing. In the 1960s, abortion was illegal in the United States. Rubella was linked to congenital Rubella syndrome in fetuses, which causes deafness, sight problems, heart problems and microcephaly, to name a few medical issues.
measles-close-up_3362872b
The severity of the effects of Rubella virus on the fetus depends largely on the time when the fetus is infected: Eighty-five percent of fetuses infected in the first trimester of pregnancy were likely to be affected.
Between 1964 and 1965, there were an estimated 12.5 million Rubella cases in the U.S., resulting in 2,000 newborn deaths and 20,000 babies with congenital Rubella syndrome.
Even though abortion was against U.S. law, illicit abortions were practiced at the time. According to the CDC, cases of Rubella resulted in 11,250 therapeutic or spontaneous abortions. It wasn’t until 1973 that abortions were legal in the United States.
Could this be part of some organized program to depopulate these areas of Latin America?
Today, life has become dispensable; we discard the poor and indigent, we create tens of thousands of dead, when we bomb countries and make war. The war effort is going to kill many times that number of innocent people in pursuit of terrorists while police brutality is also killing innocent people. There are tens of thousands of unnecessary infant deaths due to lack of water purification in some areas, GMO’s are creating diseases and tumors in people and the best we can do is demand that every one chip in and pay your carbon tax to eliminate climate change.
I am beginning to believe that chimpanzees are for more advanced than most of our leadership.
Smart Chimpanzee

Trojan Horse Arguments and the GMO Issue: Indian Food and Agriculture Under Attack

Region:

gmo-India-Farmers-anti-gmo-Demonstration-02_725_329
In 2013, India’s former Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar accused US companies of derailing the nation’s oilseeds production programme. Similar claims had been made before. For instance, we could revisit the 1998 mustard oil tragedy. At the time, Rajasthan Oil Industries Association claimed that a “conspiracy” was being hatched to undermine the mustard oil trade and charged that the “invisible hands of the multinationals” were involved (see the article ‘Monsanto and the Mustard Seed
India was almost self-sufficient in edible oils by the mid-1990s. Its farmers met 97% of domestic need. However, its edible oil import bill has increased dramatically since then. By 2013, India was the world’s second biggest importer of edible oils. Food and trade policy analyst Devinder Sharma notes that between 2006-07 and 2011-12 alone edible oil imports rose by 380%.
Sharma asserts self-sufficiency was not palatable to international financial institutions, and that, under pressure from the World Bank, India began to reduce the import tariffs on edible oils and imports then began to increase. The impact has been felt by millions of farmers. Instead of paying Indonesian, Malaysian, American and Brazilian farmers from where India imports edible oils, he argues the effort should be to support domestic farmers.
India meets more than half its cooking oil requirements through imports, with palm oil shipped from Indonesia and Malaysia and soybean oil from the US, Brazil and Argentina. Notwithstanding the environmental damage resulting from industrial-size mono-crop plantations (see this on palm oil in Indonesia and this on soy in Brazil), soybean imports are expected to grow even more and further threaten domestic cultivation.
In an editorial piece for Kisan Ki Awaaz (National Voice of the Farmers) in November 2015, Kishan Bir Chaudhary highlights the trend to undermine indigenous production by noting the move to completely wipe out India’s soybean cultivation. The large-scale import of soybean meal is being contemplated at cheap prices from South America, China and USA, which would flood the Indian market. This is despite there being a more than adequate quantity of soybean meal available from locally produced soybean.
Currently, the import of soybean meal is freely permitted, with a low customs duty. Soybean prices in the exporting countries are between 30% to 40% lower because of huge subsidies. This could leave few outlets for indigenous production.
Although current laws do not permit the import of any GMO-based food or feed item into India, the fear is importers may ship in GMO soybean and soybean meal at cheap rates, which will get cleared at ports without testing for the presence of GMOs.
Chaudhary notes India’s soybean farmers are under pressure due to: the import of GM cheap soybean meal; a clamour for the import of soybean itself; the discouragement of soy cultivation by political leaders; and the active involvement of foreign seed and pesticide companies in promoting GM Soy cultivation.
He calls for an immediate ban on soybean imports as well as for customs officers to uphold the law of the land with regard to prohibiting the import of GMOs by carrying out proper checks in government laboratories.
With risks of GM entering India via imports clear, we are also currently witnessing the push to get GM mustard (and other crops) commercialised and grown in Indian fields. The justification being put forward for this if that GM mustard is a high-yielding crop, but, more importantly, it would diminish the reliance on edible oil imports.
These arguments are little more than smokescreens to divert attention from 1) the actual reality of increased import costs and the associated running down of indigenous agriculture, which stem from trade policies driven by the vested interests of global agribusiness, and 2) myths about the efficacy of GM. Such Trojan horse logic is being used to ease the entry of GMOs into India.
And such entry is at risk of being done by by-passing proper processes and procedures in what Aruna Rodrigues calls a case of “unremitting fraud” and by side-lining four high-level reports advising against the adoption of these crops in India (the ‘Jairam Ramesh Report’ of February 2010, imposing an indefinite moratorium on Bt Brinjal; the ‘Sopory Committee Report’ [August 2012]; the ‘Parliamentary Standing Committee’ [PSC] Report on GM crops [August 2012]; and the ‘Technical Expert Committee [TEC] Final Report’ [June-July 2013]).
As far as the claim GM producing better yields, Devinder Sharma points out that in the US, crop yields of GM soy have been found 4% to 20% less than non-GM varieties. Whether it concerns soy, mustard or just about any other GM crop, the claims that GM produces increased yields is a myth.
If GM cannot increase yields even in the US, where high-input, irrigated, heavily subsidized commodity farming is the norm, it is irresponsible to assume that it would improve yields in the Global South, where farmers may literally bet their farms and livelihoods on a crop.
The above quote is from the report GMO Myths and Truths, which provides evidence in support of Sharma’s claims.
And farmers have indeed ‘bet’ their farms and livelihoods on a crop – and have lost (see this report from India’s The Statesman newspaper) or are being taken for a ride (see this on GM cotton, illegal royalties and financial distress).
Where, therefore, is the logic in promoting GM varieties which produce less than existing improved varieties that are not genetically modified?
Improving production should not be based on a supposed GM techno quick-fix, which the pro-GMO lobby would like us to believe in. The answer lies in adopting appropriate trade policies that favour indigenous production and local farmers and which, as Devinder Sharma notes, provides assured procurement and assured prices to farmers.
The fact that GM is not wanted or required, leads us to question why GMOs are being forced into the country (and are in fact already being consumed in terms of cotton seed oil). But it doesn’t take a genius as to why this might be.
Rajesh Krishnan, Convenor of Coalition for a GM-Free India argues that GM mustard is a backdoor entry for various other GM crops in the regulatory pipeline.
He adds:
GM mustard hybrid has been created mainly to facilitate the seed production work of seed manufacturers whereas farmers already have a choice of non-GM mustard hybrids in the market, in addition to high yielding non hybrid mustard varieties. There are non-GM agro-ecological options like System of Mustard Intensification yielding far higher production than the claimed yields of this GM mustard… This is clearly one more GMO that is unwanted and unneeded and is being thrust on citizens in violation of our right to choices, as farmers and consumers.
Little wonder then that most state governments have been unwilling to take up field trials.

It's Official: Cash is Now Public Enemy Number One

Posted by George Freund on February 10, 2016



February 9, 2016

First Major Offensive in War on Cash

By Don Quijones, Spain & Mexico, editor at WOLF STREET.

Terrorists are no longer public enemy number one. Nor are drug lords, people traffickers, arms dealers, cyber terrorists, or any other unsavory do-badder. Today, the biggest threat to global peace and security is physical cash, a means of exchange that has flourished for over 4,000 years but which now stands accused of being the world’s biggest enabler of criminality.

A Criminal’s Accomplice

The latest person to publicly highlight the deadly threat posed by cash is Peter Sands, the former CEO of the British bank Standard Chartered, who just published a report for Harvard Kennedy School of Government imploring central banks around the world to stop issuing high-denomination notes and bills. They include the €500 note, the $100 bill, the CHF1,000 note and the £50 note.

“Such notes are the preferred payment mechanism of those pursuing illicit activities, given the anonymity and lack of transaction record they offer, and the relative ease with which they can be transported and moved,” the report warns. In other words, only criminals use cash. High-denomination notes, the report adds, “play little role in the functioning of the legitimate economy, yet a crucial role in the underground economy.”

Sands is no doubt a leading authority on the role of cash in the criminal economy, having led a company that schemed with the government of Iran to avoid U.S. sanctions and “hide from regulators roughly 60,000 secret transactions, involving at least $250bn, and reaping SCB hundreds of millions of dollars in fees.”

That’s according to the New York State department, which in 2012 fined Standard Chartered close to a billion dollars for leaving the US financial system “vulnerable to terrorists, weapons dealers, drug kingpins and corrupt regimes, and deprived law enforcement investigators of crucial information used to track all manner of criminal activity.” Two years later the bank’s anti-money-laundering systems were found wanting, and in 2015 it was once again accused of breaking Iran sanctions.

The fact that the bank compiled an extensive rap sheet under Sands’ watch does not in any way disqualify him from leading an investigation on the enabling role of cash in organized crime. On the contrary, it makes him the perfect point man. Sands is also a member of the Board of Directors of the Institute of International Finance, the global association of financial institutions, and chairman of their Special Committee on Effective Regulation.

First Major Offensive in War on Cash

In his report, Sands and his illustrious colleagues urge the world’s largest 20 economies to “take up the matter” – i.e. broach the subject of banning large denominations of cash – at the next G20 summit in China. If the world’s leading policy makers follow through on the report’s advice, it will be the first major offensive in the global war on cash.

Sands is not the first senior banker to scapegoat cash for society’s ills. For years assorted bankers, politicians, technocrats and business leaders have waged an intensifying war of words against physical currency [The War on Cash in 10 Spine-Chilling Quotes].

A few weeks ago Norway’s biggest bank called for its outright abolition after guesstimating that as much as 60% of the country’s physical cash is out of the central bank’s control. And for central banks, control is everything.

In a similar vein, John Cryan, the CEO of Deutsche Bank, predicted that cash “probably won’t exist” in ten years time. “There is no need for it, it is terribly inefficient and expensive,” Cryan said.

This is news to most people in Germany, where approximately 80% of all transactions are conducted in cash (in the US and UK, it’s less than 50%). Cash is also the dominant form of payment for larger transactions, according to a recent survey. Does that mean that most Germans are, in the logic of the report’s findings, criminals? Obviously not! Or at least not yet! They just believe that using cash is a good way of keeping track of their personal finances as well as protecting their privacy and anonymity. Indeed, as the survey points out, the real point isn’t so much that Germans love cash. It’s that they loathe consumer debt.

The Real Reason for Offing Cash

Over the last few years every imaginable reason has been trotted out for doing away with cash, from creating a more inclusive financial system to making life easier, more comfortable and more productive. A Bloomberg article called cash just about every ugly name under the sun, including “dirty and dangerous, unwieldy and expensive, antiquated and so very analog.”

However, the one reason for offing cash that hardly ever gets a mention is that it represents a limiting factor on central banks’ ability to continue their insane negative-interest-rate experiment, as WOLF STREET reported last year:
Cash significantly limits central banks’ ability to continue conducting arguably the greatest financial heist of the modern age, i.e., negative interest rate policy (NIRP). The only way that central banks can maintain negative interest rates ad infinitum is by abolishing cash altogether, as the Bank of England chief economist Andrew Hadlaine all but admitted. As long as cash exists, there’s no way of preventing depositors from doing the logical thing – i.e. taking their money out of the bank and parking it where the erosive effects of NIRP can’t reach it. [First They Came for the Pennies, in the War on Cash]
Cash also serves as a means of exchange in which the relevant rent seekers (banks, credit card companies, tech firms) are left out of the equation, unable to wet their beaks in commissions and fees and to collect the treasure of consumer data that comes with electronic payments. Throw in the nagging fact that in a world where physical currency continues to exist, government and corporations cannot track and trace your every movement, and it’s not hard to understand why cash is now public enemy number one in many of the world’s jurisdictions. By Don Quijones,Raging Bull-Shit.

Then there’s the hundred-billion-dollar question. Read…  The Big-Oil Bailouts Begin


http://wolfstreet.com/2016/02/09/cash-public-enemy-number-one/