Posts
US Agribusiness, GMOs and The Plundering Of The Planet ~ hows bout the " $$$$$$$$$$ " "har~vess~ting" go~in ON ! HUH
Small family/peasant farms produce most of the world’s food. They form the bedrock of global food production.
Yet they are being squeezed onto less than a quarter of the planet’s
farmland. The world is fast losing farms and farmers through the
concentration of land into the hands of rich and powerful land
speculators and agribusiness corporations.
By definition, peasant
agriculture prioritises food production for local and national markets
as well as for farmers’ own families. Big agritech corporations on the
other hand take over scarce fertile land and prioritise commodities or
export crops for profit and foreign markets that tend to cater for the
needs of the urban affluent. This process displaces farmers from their
land and brings about food insecurity, poverty and hunger.
What big agribusiness with its
industrial model of globalised agriculture claims to be doing –
addressing global hunger and food shortages – is doing nothing of the
sort. There is enough evidence to show that its activities actually lead to hunger and poverty - something
that the likes of GMO-agribusiness-neoliberal apologists might like to
consider when they propagandize about choice, democracy and hunger:
issues that they seem unable to grasp, at least beyond a self-serving
superficial level.
Small farmers are being
criminalised, taken to court and even made to disappear when it comes to
the struggle for land. They are constantly exposed to systematic expulsion from their land by foreign corporations. The Oakland Institute has
stated that now a new generation of institutional investors, including
hedge funds, private equity and pension funds, is eager to capitalise
on global farmland as a new and highly desirable asset class. Financial
returns are what matter to these entities, not ensuring food security.
Consider Ukraine, for example.
Small farmers operate 16% of agricultural land, but provide 55% of
agricultural output, including: 97% of potatoes, 97% of honey, 88% of
vegetables, 83% of fruits and berries and 80% of milk. It is clear that Ukraine’s small farms are delivering impressive outputs.
However, The US-backed toppling
of that country’s government seems likely to change this with the
installed puppet regime handing over agriculture to US agribusiness.
Current ‘aid’ packages are contingent on the plundering of the economy
under the guise of ‘austerity’ reforms and will have a devastating impact on Ukrainians’ standard of living and increase poverty in the country.
Reforms mandated by the EU-backed loan include agricultural
deregulation that is intended to benefit foreign agribusiness
corporations. Natural resource and land policy shifts are intended to
facilitate the foreign corporate takeover of enormous tracts of land.
(From 2016, foreign private investors will no longer be prohibited from
buying land.) Moreover, the EU Association Agreement includes a clause requiring both parties to cooperate to extend the use of biotechnology, including GMOs.
In other words, events in Ukraine are helping (and were designed to
help) the likes of Monsanto to gain a firm hold over the country’s
agriculture.
Frederic Mousseau, Policy Director of the Oakland Institute last year
stated that the World Bank and IMF are intent on opening up foreign
markets to Western corporations and that the high stakes around control of Ukraine’s vast agricultural sector,
the world’s third largest exporter of corn and fifth largest exporter
of wheat, constitute an oft-overlooked critical factor. He added that in
recent years, foreign corporations have acquired more than 1.6 million
hectares of Ukrainian land.
Western agribusiness had been coveting Ukraine’s agriculture sector
for quite some time, long before the coup. It after all contains one
third of all arable land in Europe.
An article posted on Oriental Review notes
that since the mid-90s the Ukrainian-Americans at the helm of the
US-Ukraine Business Council had been instrumental in encouraging the
foreign control of Ukrainian agriculture.
In November 2013, the Ukrainian Agrarian Confederation drafted a
legal amendment that would benefit global agribusiness producers by
allowing the widespread use of genetically modified seeds. Oriental
Review notes that when GMO crops were legally introduced onto the
Ukrainian market in 2013, they were planted in up to 70% of all soybean
fields, 10-20% of cornfields, and over 10% of all sunflower fields,
according to various estimates (or 3% of the country’s total farmland).
According to Oriental Review, “within two to three years, as the
relevant provisions of the Association Agreement between Ukraine and the
EU go into effect, Monsanto’s lobbying efforts will transform the
Ukrainian market into an oligopoly consisting of American corporations.”
It amounts to little more than the start of the US colonisation of
Ukraine’s seed and agriculture sector. This corporate power grab will be
assisted by local banks. Apparently these banks will only offer
favourable credit terms to those farmers who agree to use certified
herbicides: those that are manufactured by Monsanto.
Interestingly, the investment fund Siguler Guff & Co has recently acquired a 50% stake in the Ukrainian Port of Illichivsk, which specialises in agricultural exports.
We need look no further than to Ukraine’s immediate neighbour Poland
to see the devastating impact on farmers that Western agribusiness
concerns are having there. Land grabs by foreign capital and the threat
to traditional (often organic) agriculture have sparked mass protests as big agribusiness seeks to monopolise the food supply from field to plate. The writing is on the wall for Ukraine.
The situation is not unique to Poland, though; the impact of policies
that favour big agribusiness and foreign capital are causing hardship,
impacting health and destroying traditional agriculture across the
world, from India and Argentina to Brazil and Mexico and beyond.
In an article by Christina Sarich, Hilliary Martin, a farmer from Vermont in the US, encapsulates the situation by saying:
“We are here at the [US-Canadian] border to demonstrate the global solidarity of farmers in the face of globalization. The corporate takeover of agriculture has impoverished farmers, starved communities and force-fed us genetically-engineered crops, only to line the pockets of a handful of multinational corporations like Monsanto at the expense of farmers who are struggling for land and livelihood around the world.”
The US has since 1945 used agriculture as a tool with which to control countries.
And today what is happening in Ukraine is part of the wider US
geopolitical plan to drive a wedge between Ukraine and Russia and to
subjugate the country.
While the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)
is intended to integrate the wider EU region with the US economy (again
‘subjugate’ may be a more apt word), by introducing GMOs into Ukraine
and striving to eventually incorporate the country into the EU the
hope is that under the banner of ‘free trade’ Monsanto’s aim of getting
this technology into the EU and onto the plates of Europeans will
become that much easier.
Colin Todhunter is an extensively published independent writer and former social policy reader.
