George Orwell, the Fabian Society and 1984

Posted on 08/02/2013 by Sagacious News Network

Source:  Conspiracy Truths by Liam Roberts
Unfolding right in front of our eyes today is the world of Big Brother and Thought Control portrayed by George Orwell in his classic book 1984.
1984 was written over 60 years ago in 1948. It portrays a stunningly accurate and frightening picture of where we are potentially heading as a global society. Despite being released as fiction, and despite the books title, its it was almost certainly based on a vision of the future that is planned, not for 1984, but for a few years later. The year 1984 was used symbolically and is significant to Orwell’s secret society connection as I will explain.  George Orwell (real name Eric Blair) was educated at Eton College, a well known Illuminati education center – it has produced 19 British Prime Ministers including David Cameron. While at Eton, Orwell was taught French by Aldous Huxley, it was here they became life long friends.  Huxley, who was also the author of another interesting book, ‘Brave New World ‘, introduced Orwell to the Fabian society. The Fabian society is a secret society at its core, although anyone can join, like all of these societies there are many levels of initiation (such as with the Freemasons), meaning the majority of people involved in the organization have no idea of the true agenda and carry out their roles creating a front for the fraud at the heart of the organization. The Fabian Society has been instrumental in the global fascist agenda. It was the force behind the creation of the Labour Party in Britain but operates both officially and unofficially across the globe as I will detail elsewhere.
The name Fabian is said to come from ‘Fabius’, the Roman general, Quintus Fabius Maximus Verrucosus. Fabius employed carefully planned strategies to wear down his enemies over a long period of time avoiding battles that could prove decisive either way. And of course this is exactly how the global agenda has been planned out. What is more, the Fabian society has a wolf in sheep clothing for its logo (right), how appropriate, and its motto is “Remould it nearer to the hearts desire”, also appropriate.
The significance in the title of Orwell’s book is the fact that 1984 is the centenary year of the Fabian society, perhaps just another tidy coincidence but it is speculated that he became disillusioned with the society and 1984 was written not as fiction but an expose of the knowledge of the Fabian agenda. And that would then explain why the Fabian Society reportedly control the copyright of ’1984′ until at least 2025, they control the rights to his estate and they own and have sealed Orwell’s archives.
It would also explain how Orwell could write a book in 1948 telling in great detail how the mass population could be so easily controlled by the relative few elite.
I was given a copy of this book recently, (so some time after I had been writing about conspiracies), and I could not believe how close to ‘reality’ this book is.  At some point I would like to write about the book in more detail and make some very interesting comparisons, for now here is a taste;

“Do you begin to see, then, what kind of world we are creating? It is the exact opposite of the stupid hedonistic Utopias that the old reformers imagined. A world of fear and treachery and torment, a world of trampling and being trampled upon, a world which will grown not less but more merciless as it refines itself. Progress in our world will be progress toward more pain. The old civilizations claimed that they were founded on love or justice. Ours is founded upon hatred. In our world there will be no emotions except fear, rage, triumph, and self-abasement. Everything else we shall destroy – everything. Already we are breaking down the habits of thought which have survived from before the Revolution. We have cut the links between man and man, and between man and woman. No one dares trust a wife or a child or a friend any longer. But in the future there will be no wives and no friends. Children will be taken from their mothers at birth, as one takes eggs from a hen. The sex instinct will be eradicated. Procreation will be an annual formality like the renewal of a ration card. We shall abolish the orgasm. Our Neurologists are at work upon it now.  There will be no loyalty except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother. There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent we shall have no more need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always – do not forget this Winston – always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always at every moment there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – for ever.”- 1984

The point I need to stress is that it doesn’t have to be like this. What Orwell describes in 1984 is where we will be within maybe two decades if we continue as we are. I am one of the few people who discuss this topic with a positive view of where we are ultimately heading. There is light at the end of the tunnel as it were, and we will get there, but we need to start waking up first. Problems don’t go away, they need dealing with.
How you fall is not important, what matters is how you land…
Ultimately, when you start to understand the nature of the global conspiracy, you see that how this global manipulation actually works, the complexities of it all, the intricate details, they do not matter… The intricate details may be crucial to understanding what is going on in the world but ultimately when you understand the real nature of this reality they are meaningless. We are trapped in a what I and others call a manipulation of the five senses. See my article Consciousness.  It’s not all as complicated as it sounds, when you start to read into things, it all becomes obvious when you start connecting the dots and when you do begin to understand the conspiracy more, you look around wondering why the hell everyone is so blind to the truth that is staring them in the face.
Sadly Ignorance is bliss. We are systematically indoctrinated to believe certain dogmas or to embrace rigid belief systems such as Religions or mainstream science. The apparent divisions between us of race, age, sex, culture, religion, job and income bracket, etc are mere illusions. Many people simply cannot deal with information which challenges their belief system. People either don’t want to hear it, or just can’t accept it. This is what researcher David Icke describes as Cognitive dissonance, it mostly takes the form of a belief contradicted by experience, information or behavior. In 1984, Orwell describes cognitive dissonance to a tee, he calls it, rather appropriately, doublethink – this is exactly how the majority of humanity has remained in servitude for thousands of years. Most people actually fight to protect their own belief system, dismissing information that challenges it without further investigation, these are the people with their heads in the sand.  If you have your head in the sand you cannot see what is going on right in front of your very own eyes. If you get off your knees and take a look at what is going on, then you can start to change it. Remember – We, the people, are the majority, we have more power than we are made to believe. That is why this conspiracy has been operating covertly for so many thousands of years, if the elite wanted to go from A-Z straight away we would all see what was going on and oppose it, but if they go from A-Z via B, C, D etc, (the Fabian strategy), taking lots of steps and gradually introducing changes then the agenda becomes unclear and only those paying attention and ignoring the disinformation from the Illuminati controlled media can see the real game plan.
I want to write more about 1984 because it really is an amazing book, therefore I hope to revisit and update this page at a later stage.

Related: Aldous Huxley – Speech at UC Berkeley, The Ultimate Revolution 1962

Read more at http://sagaciousnewsnetwork.com/george-orwell-the-fabian-society-and-1984/#h9mU0g7mxQDP0dOt.99

Artificial Intelligence Successfully Pretends to Be Human – Now What?

Posted on 06/10/2014 by Sagacious News Network

(Susanne Posel) Vladimir Veselov, computer software developer and Eugene Demchenko, software engineer, have created the first computer that fooled humans into thinking they were speaking to a 13 year old boy.
The University of Reading (UR) said that 33% of participants in a 5 minute online conversation with “Eugene Goostman” were tricked into believing this computer was actually a real-life teenager.
Strikingly, this feat means that Veselov and Demchenko successfully created a computer program that passed the Turing Test.
In 1950, Alan Turing wrote a paper entitled Computing Machinery and Intelligence that asked the question: “Can machines think?”
The Turing Test establishes a “test for intelligence in a computer, requiring that a human being should be unable to distinguish the machine from another human being by using the replies to questions put to both.”
With the revelation posed by “Eugene”, artificial intelligence (AI) takes a giant leap forward by way of future consent for the review of sentience in computing which paves the way for asking the question: Should computers be allowed to decide what actions they take and when to act on those decisions?
Veselov explained: “Our whole team is very excited with this result. Going forward we plan to make Eugene smarter and continue working on improving what we refer to as ‘conversation logic.’”
RoboLaw (RL), in conjunction with UR School of Systems Engineering (SSE) provided the funding for this event with “Eugene”.
RL explains they are a consortium of academia whose “main objective … is to investigate the ways in which emerging technologies in the field of (bio-) robotics (e.g. bionics, neural interfaces and nanotechnologies) have a bearing on the content, meaning and setting of the law.”
Their main focus in making robotics more agreeable to the general public resides in using AI technology in:
• Assistance to humans
• Industrial work
• Medical industry
Charles Bailey, digital artist, librarian and publisher of Digital Scholarship (DS), explained that “intelligent computers must be able to reason; however, to be effective, reason may require broad knowledge about the real world” and be able to “understand written and verbal communication”.
Because “we want computers that talk to us”, Bailey said AI must “not only master our native language, but also be able to translate messages from other languages.”
It would be more aesthetically pleasing if the robots had human-like bodies “equipped with visual, auditory, and other sensory capabilities that matched or exceeded human abilities” and could perform tasks such as:
• Construction
• Manufacturing
• Fire fighting
• Routine office duties
• Domestic chores
While examining the morality behind creating sentient robots, Bailey asks the following questions:

• Will intelligent computers have relationships that parallel human ones?
• Will they be constructed to be sexual or alter themselves to be so?
• Will they have love relationships?
• Will they form family units, or will they create complex new social structures we cannot envision?
• Will they procreate, or will they allow humans to produce new intelligent computers?
• If they procreate, how will they do so, and will the offspring inherit any of the traits of the parents?
• Will the offspring be created fully functional or will there be a period of childhood?
• Will offspring have any special feelings for their parents?
• How fast will each generation be?
• Will each generation replicate the basic structure and functionality of the last generation, or will each generation represent an advance in the design of the species, causing rapid evolutionary development.
• Will intelligent computers and humans form love relationships?
• Will society recognize the legitimacy of such relationships?
• Will they form friendships with each other and humans?

Ultimately, Bailey sees the advent of intelligent computers placing humanity in the role of “making godlike decisions about a new form of intelligent life” and this necessitates a “delicate balance between controlling truly intelligent computers and nurturing them so that they can develop to their full potential.”

Kara : a PS3 new technology

Read more at http://sagaciousnewsnetwork.com/artificial-intelligence-successfully-pretends-to-be-human-now-what/#rwl0s2ldJ2EY3SQL.99

Russia Is Doing It – Russia Is Actually Abandoning The Dollar

By Michael Snyder, on June 10th, 2014

 

The Russians are actually making a move against the petrodollar.  It appears that they are quite serious about their de-dollarization strategy.  The largest natural gas producer on the planet, Gazprom, has signed agreements with some of their biggest customers to switch payments for natural gas from U.S. dollars to euros.  And Gazprom would have never done this without the full approval of the Russian government, because the Russian government holds a majority stake in Gazprom.  There hasn't been a word about this from the big mainstream news networks in the United States, but this is huge.  When you are talking about Gazprom, you are talking about a company that is absolutely massive.  It is one of the largest companies in the entire world and it makes up 8 percent of Russian GDP all by itself.  It holds 18 percent of the natural gas reserves of the entire planet, and it is also a very large oil producer.  So for Gazprom to make a move like this is extremely significant.
When Barack Obama decided to slap some meaningless economic sanctions on Russia a while back, he probably figured that the world would forget about them after a few news cycles.
But the Russians do not forget, and they certainly do not forgive.
At this point the Russians are turning their back on the United States, and that includes the U.S. dollar.
What you are about to read is absolutely stunning, and yet you have not heard about it from any major U.S. news source.  But what Gazprom is now doing has the potential to really shake up the global financial landscape.  The following is an excerpt from a news report by the ITAR-TASS news agency...

Gazprom Neft had signed additional agreements with consumers on a possible switch from dollars to euros for payments under contracts, the oil company's head Alexander Dyukov told a press conference.
"Additional agreements of Gazprom Neft on the possibility to switch contracts from dollars to euros are signed. With Belarus, payments in roubles are agreed on," he said.
Dyukov said nine of ten consumers had agreed to switch to euros.

And Gazprom is not the only big company in Russia that is moving away from the U.S. dollar.
According to RT, other large Russian corporations are moving to other currencies as well...

Russia will start settling more contracts in Asian currencies, especially the yuan, in order to lessen its dependence on the dollar market, and because of Western-led sanctions that could freeze funds at any moment.
“Over the last few weeks there has been a significant interest in the market from large Russian corporations to start using various products in renminbi and other Asian currencies, and to set up accounts in Asian locations,” Pavel Teplukhin, head of Deutsche Bank in Russia, told the Financial Times, which was published in an article on Sunday.
Diversifying trade accounts from dollars to the Chinese yuan and other Asian currencies such as the Hong Kong dollar and Singapore dollar has been a part of Russia’s pivot towards Asian as tension with Europe and the US remain strained over Russia’s action in Ukraine.

And according to Zero Hedge, "expanding the use of non-dollar currencies" is one of the main things that major Russian banks are working on right now...

Andrei Kostin, chief executive of state bank VTB, said that expanding the use of non-dollar currencies was one of the bank’s “main tasks”. “Given the extent of our bilateral trade with China, developing the use of settlements in roubles and yuan [renminbi] is a priority on the agenda, and so we are working on it now,” he told Russia’s President Vladimir Putin during a briefing. “Since May, we have been carrying out this work.”
“There is nothing wrong with Russia trying to reduce its dependency on the dollar, actually it is an entirely reasonable thing to do,” said the Russia head of another large European bank. He added that Russia’s large exposure to the dollar subjects it to more market volatility in times of crisis. “There is no reason why you have to settle trade you do with Japan in dollars,” he said.

The entire country is undergoing a major financial conversion.
This is just staggering.
Meanwhile, Russians have been pulling money out of U.S. banks at an unprecedented pace...

So in March, without waiting for the sanction spiral to kick in, Russians yanked their moolah out of US banks. Deposits by Russians in US banks suddenly plunged from $21.6 billion to $8.4 billion. They yanked out 61% of their deposits in just one month! They'd learned their lesson in Cyprus the hard way: get your money out while you still can before it gets confiscated.

For those that don't think that all of this could hurt the U.S. economy or the U.S. financial system, you really need to go back and read my previous article entitled "De-Dollarization: Russia Is On The Verge Of Dealing A Massive Blow To The Petrodollar".  The truth is that the U.S. economic system is extremely dependent on the financial behavior of the rest of the globe.
Because nearly everyone else around the rest of the planet uses our currency to trade with one another, that keeps the value of the U.S. dollar artificially high and it keeps our borrowing costs artificially low.
As Russia abandons the U.S. dollar that will hurt, but if other nations start following suit that could eventually cause a financial avalanche.
What we are witnessing right now is just a turning point.
The effects won't be felt right away.  So don't expect this to cause financial disaster next week or next month.
But this is definitely another element in the "perfect storm" that is starting to brew for the U.S. economy.
Yes, we have been living in a temporary bubble of false stability for a few years.  However, the long-term outlook has not gotten any better.  In fact, the long-term trends that are destroying our economic and financial foundations just continue to get even worse.
So enjoy the "good times" while you still can.
They certainly will not last too much longer.

Nine Democrat Senators Allegedly Involved in IRS Targeting Scandal

Posted on June 11, 2014 by Tim Brown

Much has been made, and rightly so, about the Obama administration’s targeting of Conservatives and Tea Party groups. There is no doubt that with the information that has come out that the White House and the Internal Revenue Service were orchestrating the targeting of conservative groups. However, now the Center for Competitive Politics has filed a complaint, which claims that Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) along with other Democrat senators sought to deny the free speech of their political opponents by using the IRS.

Bradley A. Smith and David Keating at the Wall Street Journal report:

On Monday the Center for Competitive Politics filed a complaint with the Senate Select Committee on Ethics against nine U.S. senators: for interfering with IRS tax proceedings; for misusing official resources for campaign purposes; and for improper conduct that reflects poorly upon the Senate. Attempting to use the IRS to advance a partisan, electoral agenda is a fundamental assault on good government. We believe these elected officials have staged such an assault.

The complaint documents how the senators improperly interfered with IRS adjudications to further their party’s electoral prospects. They pressured the IRS to undertake income-tax investigations of specific organizations, to find that specific organizations were in violation of the law, to reach predetermined results pertaining to pending applications by individual organizations for nonprofit status, and to adopt specific regulatory interpretations and policies to further their campaign goals.

So, the issue of whether or not the attacks upon Tea Party groups and conservatives by the IRS originated with the White House may not necessarily be true, but actually originated in a Democrat controlled Senate by Democrat senators, namely Chuck Schumer.

The Journal went on to add:

Just days after the final defeat of the Disclose Act in October 2010, Sen. Richard Durbin (D., Ill.)—another senator in our complaint—wrote to IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman on his official letterhead to demand that the IRS “quickly examine the tax status of Crossroads GPS,” a major conservative nonprofit.

Mr. Durbin accused Crossroads GPS of breaking the law. He later admitted to Chris Wallace on Fox News that he sought the investigation because “they were boastful about how much money they were going to raise and beat Democrats with.”

Pressure on the IRS increased after the 2010 midterm Republican landslide. Mr. Schumer stated in one speech, “It’s clear we’re not going to pass anything legislatively,” due to “Republican control” of the House. “But there are many things that can be done by the IRS . . . and we have to redouble our efforts. We have not worked hard enough on this.” In a letter to the IRS on March 12, 2012, Mr. Schumer urged the service to investigate various groups identified through reference to news articles.

Michigan Sen. Carl Levin wrote at least seven letters to the IRS, and demanded that it investigate specific nonprofits. The IRS’s failure to launch these investigations, he wrote in one, was “unacceptable.” Mr. Levin also sought confidential nonprofit tax return information from the IRS, even after being warned, repeatedly, by IRS Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement Steven T. Miller, that such information could not be legally divulged.

Understand that Democrats had attempted to silence their opposition through legislation. When that didn’t work, they started interfering in another branch of government to get them to do their bidding. While they can question those agencies, they are definitely violating ethics by attempting to impose themselves in the middle of tax exemption status of American groups, be they conservative or liberal. But according to the complaint, they were not just imposing themselves, they were actually calling for investigations and seeking to prosecute conservative organizations.

And why, you may ask. All because one side was claiming to raise a lot of money, and in politics, money is free speech. If you have money, you can buy more air time, radio time, and newspaper and internet ads.

In May, we reported that documents obtained by Judicial Watch through the Freedom of Information Act indicated that the White House was intimately involved in the IRS targeting. We also know that the former head of the IRS, Lois Lerner, knew of the targeting at least as far back as 2011, maybe even earlier, and that emails have suggested that Lerner and a Federal Election Commission attorney conspired to target conservative groups. Emails also reveal that the collusion even went on between Lerner and Eric Holder’s Justice Department to jail the political opponents of Barack Obama. My, what a tangled web we weave!

This isn’t policy friends. This is criminal activity. It’s tyranny.

Will those who claim the mantel of “investigative journalists” do their jobs and seek out the truth in this matter, or will they continue to go quietly along with this administration and members of Congress that are so corrupt that they turn on their fellow citizens and those they represent, all for political gain?

Tim Brown is the Editor of Freedom Outpost.

THAT “SPACE FENCE” THING AGAIN: SOME SPECULATIONS

Posted on June 11, 2014 by Joseph P. Farrell • Filed Under: Cosmic War •http://gizadeathstar.com/2014/06/space-fence-thing-speculations/

A regular reader here, Ms. M.W. shared this, and since our attention has been on space matters lately, we need to take a look at it. It concerns that “space fence” or early warning system the Pentagon wants to construct to detect space debris that threatens satellites: the article is here:
Pentagon plans project to combat ‘space junk chain reaction,’ but is it really incoming space rocks they’re worried about?
If you scroll down to the comments you’ll see a remark by someone claiming to have worked for the space command who states that he(or she) attempted to get the Space Command to include asteroid detection as a system mission and requirement, and stating that radar is not adequate to this purpose, and that optical telescopes of medium aperture would be better. This, the commentator notes, was not implemented due to “politics.”
I suspect that this might be the case. Let’s recall that Russia’s former president Dmitri Medvedev, approximately a month prior to the Chelyabinsk meteor incident called for a world wide asteroid detection and defense system, and that Russia could and should put into place the components of such a system at least for Russian protection, but that he admitted the project would require international cooperation. Telescopes were a component of his suggestions, indicating that his remarks most likely had been carefully prepared, and that Mr.. Medvedev had doubtlessly been briefed by his country’s science and defense experts. This raises the prospect that the “politics” which the commentator refers to might have been as much about international cooperation on such plans as about internal domestic politics within the USA, or for that matter, within the Pentagon itself.
This raises the speculative possibility that we are indeed looking at the first steps in a system that ultimately is designed not only to serve as a kind of “space air traffic control” system, with its warnings of near collisions and so on, but also as the first component of a wider system designed precisely for asteroid defense. So what might one look for in coming months and years if this is the case?
One would look for precisely what Mr. Medvedev suggested in his remarks: a system combining both Earth-based and space-based radars and telescopes. That, it would appear, would be the indication that we are looking perhaps at the approach to the penultimate stage of Dr. Carol Rosin’s recounting of what Dr. Von Braun told her would be the stages argued for the weaponization of space: first Communists, then terrorists, then “nations of concern,” then asteroids, and finally, aliens…
The real question, in that context, then becomes: how did he know it? What process of policy-formation within those rarefied heights had led to the conclusion that there was a need for asteroid defense and a system to defend against aliens? Was it merely a conveniently invented threat to accomplish a more mundane earthly geopolitical agenda? Or was it real? And if real, what process led to the conclusion that the Earth needed a system to defend against aliens? Or was it somewhere between these two poles?