Sunday, May 3, 2015

If you paid $100 for Mayweather-Pacquiao, you're a chump     ~ hehe that's right u's "fell" fer it ....  again !  Oops  .... sucker's :o

Harry How/Getty Images
A record number of people paid a record amount of money to watch a guy with no interest in punching fight against a guy with an injured shoulder. A record number of people are chumps.
Mayweather vs. Pacquiao was billed as the fight of the century. In reality, it was boring as hell. Mayweather conservatively and methodically dominated. Pacquiao was hopeless, mainly punching the air, and he revealed after the fight he had an injured shoulder.
If you were smart, you realized this fight would be boring, and decided not to pay the record $100 pay-per-view to watch it.
If you're a chump, you did pay for it. You gave a decent amount of money to watch something that in retrospect, you might not watch if it was free. We're sorry that you were dumb enough to do this, and we sincerely hope you learn from the experience.
I don't call Mayweather's victory "boring" to take away from Floyd Mayweather's skill. As our Luke Thomas said, this fight firmly established that Mayweather is the greatest boxer of this generation. He just stepped in the ring against a furious tornado of powerful punches and his face barely got touched. It's incredible.
But it isn't exciting. Mayweather knew he was the better boxer, and didn't put himself in a position to get beaten. He never came out swinging. He never tried for a knockout. The result was a fight with practically no drama. Mayweather was calmly in control for the majority of the match.
Who could've predicted this? Oh, EVERYBODY? Deadspin's Iron Mike Gallego summarized it solidly in January, before the fight was even booked:
What does this mean? Another dull, boring Mayweather decision, another massive Mayweather payday, and another boxing fan wondering why he or she plunked down $100 to see that.
Sure enough! Here you are, wondering why you plunked that cash down.
Mayweather is going to retire never having fought somebody on his level. The trick he pulls is convincing you that he's about to fight somebody on his level. In this case, it was past-his-prime Manny Pacquiao, six years after this fight should've happened.
But it's worse! Because this wasn't even Manny Pacquiao at full strength. Pacquiao's team claims Manny has a tear in his shoulder, and had for almost a month, and that he'll need surgery on it.
Some think this is just a way saving face after a bad performance. But let's believe them for a second: they're telling us that they asked an injured boxer to give it a shot against an all-time great with an injured shoulder.
This is not a sound boxing decision. It is, however, a spectacular decision when you get $100 million just for showing up. Manny Pacquiao got $100 million for showing up.
If you had known Pacquiao had an injured shoulder, you probably wouldn't have paid $100 for the fight. But they didn't tell you that. They let you pay, let Pacquiao fight, then told you. They made you a chump for thinking this was a matchup between to greats at their best.
Floyd Mayweather is smart. It's not his job to fight somebody who should beat him. It's not his job to give that person an opportunity to give that opportunity to beat him by fighting brashly. It's his job to win and get paid. And he did.
Manny Pacquiao and his team are smart too. They knew they had to make this show go on, even if Pacquiao was hurt.
You, however, are a chump. You paid more money than anybody has ever paid for a pay-per-view to watch a fight guaranteed to be boring. Mayweather and Pacquiao were happy to take your money, and you were happy to give it to them.
We tried to warn you. We tried to tell you that you could've bought all these cool things with that money. We tried to tell you that you could've donated money to a charity benefitting victims of domestic violence shelter instead of giving money to Mayweather, a serial abuser of women. This time, you opted not to listen. You opted to pay for a bad fight. For this, we are obligated to tell you that you are a chump.
You have a chance to redeem yourself. The next time somebody's asking you to fork over your hard-earned cash for something that will surely suck, we will be here, telling you to keep that money. It's your choice whether to listen or accept permanent chump status.

Major U.S. Retailers Are Closing More Than 6,000 Stores

By Michael Snyder

If the U.S. economy really is improving, then why are big U.S. retailers permanently shutting down thousands of stores?  The “retail apocalypse” that I have written about so frequently appears to be accelerating.

As you will see below, major U.S. retailers have announced that they are closing more than 6,000 locations, but economic conditions in this country are still fairly stable.  So if this is happening already, what are things going to look like once the next recession strikes?

For a long time, I have been pointing to 2015 as a major “turning point” for the U.S. economy, and I still feel that way.  And since I started The Economic Collapse Blog at the end of 2009, I have never seen as many indications that we are headed into another major economic downturn as I do right now.  If retailers are closing this many stores already, what are our malls and shopping centers going to look like a few years from now?


The list below comes from information compiled by About.com, but I have only included major retailers that have announced plans to close at least 10 stores.  Most of these closures will take place this year, but in some instances the closures are scheduled to be phased in over a number of years.  As you can see, the number of stores that are being permanently shut down is absolutely staggering…

180 Abercrombie & Fitch (by 2015)
75 Aeropostale (through January 2015)
150 American Eagle Outfitters (through 2017)
223 Barnes & Noble (through 2023)
265 Body Central / Body Shop
66 Bottom Dollar Food
25 Build-A-Bear (through 2015)
32 C. Wonder
21 Cache
120 Chico’s (through 2017)
200 Children’s Place (through 2017)
17 Christopher & Banks
70 Coach (fiscal 2015)
70 Coco’s /Carrows
300 Deb Shops
92 Delia’s
340 Dollar Tree/Family Dollar
39 Einstein Bros. Bagels
50 Express (through 2015)
31 Frederick’s of Hollywood
50 Fresh & Easy Grocery Stores
14 Friendly’s
65 Future Shop (Best Buy Canada)
54 Golf Galaxy (by 2016)
50 Guess (through 2015)
26 Gymboree
40 JCPenney
127 Jones New York Outlet
10 Just Baked
28 Kate Spade Saturday & Jack Spade
14 Macy’s
400 Office Depot/Office Max (by 2016)
63 Pep Boys (“in the coming years”)
100 Pier One (by 2017)
20 Pick ’n Save (by 2017)
1,784 Radio Shack
13 Ruby Tuesday
77 Sears
10 SpartanNash Grocery Stores
55 Staples (2015)
133 Target, Canada (bankruptcy)
31 Tiger Direct
200 Walgreens (by 2017)
10 West Marine
338 Wet Seal
80 Wolverine World Wide (2015 – Stride Rite & Keds)

So why is this happening?

Without a doubt, Internet retailing is taking a huge toll on brick and mortar stores, and this is a trend that is not going to end any time soon.

But as Thad Beversdorf has pointed out, we have also seen a stunning decline in true discretionary consumer spending over the past six months…
What we find is that over the past 6 months we had a tremendous drop in true discretionary consumer spending. Within the overall downtrend we do see a bit of a rally in February but quite ominously that rally failed and the bottom absolutely fell out.
Again the importance is it confirms the fundamental theory that consumer spending is showing the initial signs of a severe pull back. A worrying signal to be certain as we would expect this pull back to begin impacting other areas of consumer spending. The reason is that American consumers typically do not voluntarily pull back like that on spending but do so because they have run out of credit. And if credit is running thin it will surely be felt in all spending.
The truth is that middle class U.S. consumers are tapped out.  Most families are just scraping by financially from month to month.  For most Americans, there simply is not a whole lot of extra money left over to go shopping with these days.

In fact, at this point approximately one out of every four Americans spend at least half of their incomes just on rent
More than one in four Americans are spending at least half of their family income on rent – leaving little money left to purchase groceries, buy clothing or put gas in the car, new figures have revealed.
A staggering 11.25 million households consume 50 percent or more of their income on housing and utilities, according to an analysis of Census data by nonprofit firm, Enterprise Community Partners.
And 1.8 million of these households spend at least 70 percent of their paychecks on rent.
The surging cost of rental housing has affected a rising number of families since the Great Recession hit in 2007. Officials define housing costs in excess of 30 percent of income as burdensome.
For decades, the U.S. economy was powered by a free spending middle class that had plenty of discretionary income to throw around.  But now that the middle class is being systematically destroyed, that paradigm is changing.  Americans families simply do not have the same resources that they once did, and that spells big trouble for retailers.

As you read this article, the United States still has more retail space per person than any other nation on the planet.  But as stores close by the thousands, “space available” signs are going to be popping up everywhere.  This is especially going to be true in poor and lower middle class neighborhoods.  Especially after what we just witnessed in Baltimore, many retailers are not going to hesitate to shut down underperforming locations in impoverished areas.

And remember, the next major economic crisis has not even arrived yet.  Once it does, the business environment in this country is going to change dramatically, and a few years from now America is going to look far different than it does right now.


This article first appeared here at the Economic Collapse Blog.  Michael Snyder is a writer, speaker and activist who writes and edits his own blogs The American Dream and Economic Collapse Blog. Follow him on Twitter here.

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.

The Fight to Control the Global Climate

"If we could experiment with the atmosphere and literally play God, it's very tempting to a scientist."

Dees Illustration
Michael Edwards
Activist Post

There have been many permutations in the intellectual war to prove the effects (or not) of man-made climate change since Al Gore released his film An Inconvenient Truth. While the scientific sides continue to challenge one another -- very often injecting inflammatory and emotional rhetoric that seems less than scientific -- it is an undeniable fact that man-made solutions are the inevitable outcropping of this "problem." Enter geoengineering, or its "conspiracy" offshoot, chemtrails - the "solution."

The idea that there are government programs to alter the climate is still roundly denied by certain circles, despite numerous White Papers from think tanks, official documents admitting to climate control plans, and many public admissions from scientists and politicians alike. However, geoengineering is officially entering the mainstream, but with the spin that was warned about by many in the alternative media and non-establishment scientists.

A new report from The Verge -- one of the top 1,000 most visited websites in the world -- is worth examining for its open discussion of some of the geoengineering plans and their associated spins and pitfalls. Also posted below is my article from early 2011 that covers a question asked by the UK's elite think-tank, The Royal Society, "Who decides?"

As you'll see, the question of who should be responsible for fixing our presumably broken climate is only intensifying.

The good news for those who have long attempted to expose the existence of geoengineering is that we are finally over that hurdle of denial for anyone with open eyes and an open mind. In fact, as Derrick Broze recently covered, geoengineering research is not only allowed, it is encouraged in international law. This has led to a new study which phrases the global race towards geoengineering as a "free for all," where many treaties open the door for a global framework to address not only the possible dangers of geoengineering itself, but also the danger of leaving the power in the hands of local governments to test and impose their own solutions.
According to a recent congressional report: “The term “geoengineering” describes this array of technologies that aim, through large-scale and deliberate modifications of the Earth’s energy balance, to reduce temperatures and counteract anthropogenic climate change. Most of these technologies are at the conceptual and research stages, and their effectiveness at reducing global temperatures has yet to be proven. Moreover, very few studies have been published that document the cost, environmental effects, socio-political impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. If geoengineering technologies were to be deployed, they are expected to have the potential to cause significant transboundary effects. (Source)



As Broze highlights, the complete study is set to be published in the Journal of Energy, Climate and the Environment around the same time that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change presents its Fifth Assessment Report in 2014.

The Verge titled their article, "Weather wars: who should be allowed to engineer our climate?" which has the subtitle, "Geoengineering could be the silver bullet in fighting climate change — or the start of something even worse."

When they say "war," they mean it literally -- that is, if geoengineering's leading proponent is correct. Harvard climate scientist, David Keith, likens geoengineering to nuclear weapons ... and the subsequent race to acquire the technology. The threats are both global and personal...
Keith, who has grown into geoengineering’s leading advocate after his recent book on the topic, says the technology would be “as disruptive to the political order of the 21st century as nuclear weapons were for the 20th." It’s an exciting, dangerous idea — and it already has its opponents. In the years that he's been researching geoengineering, Keith says he's received two death threats serious enough to warrant calls to the police.
The frenzy to find a solution for an assumed case-closed on runaway global warming is leading to a dangerous all-or-nothing mindset which may see the same type of testing without full knowledge of the consequences. Scientists were said to have not been 100% certain they wouldn't ignite a chain reaction and kill the planet during weapons testing. Notice here the foregone conclusion of global warming, despite plenty of opposing views in the scientific community, plus the admission of aerial spraying and the fear of a "rogue nation" ....
In a world of catastrophic global warming, solar radiation management might be our only way to cool the planet and forestall the most damaging effects of climate change. The theory is simple: a plane sprays sulfate aerosols into the atmosphere, building a reflective layer that blocks a small portion of the sun’s energy, thus cooling the globe.
There’s plenty of support for the theory, including a few sulfate-spewing volcanoes which have cooled the globe in the past (maybe just let them continue to do their work then? - Ed.), but it’s still unclear how it would work in practice. It’s generally accepted that the sulfates would disappear from the atmosphere within a few years, but more complex effects remain unknown.

Most geoengineers think the technology should be used for a kind of "soft landing" as we phase out fossil fuels — but what if a country wanted to go further? The process is cheap enough that an island country like the Maldives, facing dire consequences from rising sea levels, might decide to kick off aggressive geoengineering on their own, daring other countries to stop them. The response would start with diplomacy, but it could escalate to the US shooting down their sulfur-spewing planes.

The next step is to test the idea in the atmosphere with small drops over the course of a few days, but that proposal is still extremely controversial. It’s easy to see why critics are nervous. In the wrong hands, solar radiation management has the potential to destroy the planet's ecosystem entirely. (emphasis added) [Source]
The full article is a must-read, as it articulates the fear-based mindset that scientists and politicians either unwillingly or willingly delude themselves with, along with the rest of us. In a race to eliminate a threat, they create vastly more with their tinkering and unknowable outcomes. In pursuit of the rogue nation, the nation that reaches the target becomes the rogue itself.

The article below was my attempt to show why those who are currently at the helm should be held with the utmost suspicion as potential saviors of the human race -- their track record is not a good one.

Your comments are welcome....
__________________________________________________________________________
Masters Of The World Meet To Play God With The Climate

On a secluded estate in England, a small group from the elite UK think-tank, The Royal Society, are openly discussing control over the planet's weather.  The Orwellian nature of the discussion is stunning, as this select group seemingly wrings their hands over how to delegate the proper authority to research such godlike power.  They begin by asking a rhetorical question, "Who decides?"

In a candid AP story, the entire agenda is laid bare as we are treated to a session that is "generally off the record."  This is the grand rollout to be sure: from research to implementation, they announce much of what is already provably in the works, as well as the road toward a future of unthinkable control by an inner circle of ideologues with the task to "save the planet."

History is full of these great "experts" who have taken on the burden of saving the rest of us.  Elites throughout the ages have insisted that the common man or woman is simply not up to the task . . . if left to our own devices, we might just destroy the place.  So, let's first recap how these elite thinkers have done so far based on the key indicators of human prosperity.

Peace:  The "peace process" is apparently a long one.  Since the War To End All Wars, there has been a steady string of significant wars, protracted conflicts, or "kinetic actions."  The central planners have failed fantastically when it comes to peace, and there is no sign of this trend reversing, as it openly has been announced that a Nobel Peace Prize can be given to the leader of the free world who has extended and declared wars that are unconstitutional and morally reprehensible.  Rather, events are demonstrably leading straight to World War III.  It seems like we would be better off without the humanitarian aid offered by such peaceniks.

Freedom:  The Map of Freedom shows most of the global population living under some form of authoritarian control, especially when North America is evaluated honestly.  Just about all of the rest lives under Democracy, which is nothing more than the soft version where two wolves and a sheep meet to decide what is for dinner.  This is the globalist model, which prefers centralized control and a curtailing of individual freedom by mafia or mob rule, resulting in the sucking of all wealth and power toward a top ruling class.  As Louis Brandeis, former Supreme Court Justice said, "We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both."  Countries with a true free market of ideas and commerce are few and far between.

Economy:  The model of centralized elite banking management has been an abject failure.  All central banks in history that have used fiat money -- most of which financed both sides of wars -- have failed in that they have bankrupted their nations and only have enriched those in control.  The current exposure of the U.S. Federal Reserve is finally reaching a crescendo, but our managers are already a step ahead discussing the endgame of a one-world currency to solve the inadequacies of the past.  I think we have had enough examples of their central planning skills.

Health: Between the EPA, FDA, and USDA -- just to cite U.S. agencies -- our elite researchers, scientists, and policy makers have been responsible for millions of deaths, conservatively.  And it is only getting worse, as this global health tyranny aims to criminalize the food and supplements that are actually proven to extend our lives.  The key poisons they enable include: mercury, aspartame, MSG, (most) vaccines, and GMOs; all proven to reduce cognition, bodily health, and life expectancy.

Environment: Fukushima is only the latest in a long history of corporate/government mismanagement with global consequences. Experts claiming to show the benefits and safety of their advice continuously bombard us. Yet, our planet has now endured multiple nuclear meltdowns, oil spills, fracking-induced earthquakes, and global fallout from wars using depleted uranium -- all of which have contaminated Earth and poisoned future generations beyond imagining.  The only success these elites can document is the mass killing by dictators like Genghis Khan, Mao, Hitler, and Stalin who eliminated a conservative total of over 100 million people, thus reducing CO2.  Well done if you are a nihilist.

With such a track record of desolation for all but the top directors, we had best pay attention to their own words about what direction they have in store for us next.

Most alarming about this semi-clandestine meeting is that the very premise upon which they base this need for global orchestration -- Global Warming -- has been thoroughly debunked by any climatologist not beholden to a government-sponsored think tank or agency.  Their famously cited Plan B for inevitable climate change is nothing more than a wish list for those who wish to de-industrialize productive nations and consolidate control through wealth redistribution.  Not a good way to start saving people.

With lies as the basis for what is to follow, we continue along our Orwellian path set forth by "scientists and scholars" toward a comprehensive new vision for the future which was framed by this elite roundtable normally hidden from public view, but brought to us by the Associated Propaganda news agency:
Provoking and parrying each other over questions never before raised in human history, the conferees were sensitive to how the outside world might react.
Science:  "If we could experiment with the atmosphere and literally play God, it's very tempting to a scientist," Kenyan earth scientist Richard Odingo.

Well, we can give points for honesty here, but are we really to believe that this "experimentation" has not already begun?  Their own words and observable facts prove otherwise.  The top contender for geoengineering on a planetary scale, according to the panel, is "stratospheric aerosol particles."  In what sounds a whole lot like tin-foil hat conspiracy Chemtrails, these "particles would be sun-reflecting sulfates spewed into the lower stratosphere from aircraft, balloons or other devices."  The current evidence for such activity has already been exhaustively documented by researchers and popularized by films such as What In The World Are They Spraying? The panel actually calls this technique Sun Radiation Management (SRM).  The problem with management is that managers are then necessary; and the ones that have been appointed should not be to our liking.

Law:  "These scenarios create winners and losers . . . Who is going to decide?" John Shepherd of Britain's Southhampton University, lead author of a 2009 Royal Society study of geoengineering.

The think tank warns that a "coalition of scientifically capable nations" should set world direction -- led of course by the U.S. and Britain, two of the most egregious abusers of the planet -- "perhaps inviting China, India, Brazil and others . . . "  But when in doubt just invoke the U.N to convince the masses that, "Many environmentalists categorically oppose intentional fiddling with Earth's atmosphere, or at least insist that such important decisions rest in the hands of the U.N., since every nation on Earth has a stake in the skies above."  The United Nations; world police force and repository of incremental global control.

Politics: "One of the challenges is identifying intentions, one of which could be offensive military use."  -- Indian development specialist Arunabha Ghosh referring to weather modification. 

If the weather can truly be controlled, then one can surmise that we are entering a future of weather wars.  And, yet, this already has been addressed in key white papers such as Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning The Weather By 2025. Perhaps the real concern is similar to that of all WMDs -- to be sure that only the ruling elite can use them, while anyone who opposes or retaliates is marked with the cattle brand of terrorist.

Philosophy:  "There's the 'slippery slope' view that as soon as you start to do this research, you say it's OK to think about things you shouldn't be thinking about."  -- Steve Rayner, co-director of Oxford University's geoengineering program.  

The philosophy of "thinking the unthinkable" always has been trumpeted as a necessary contingency plan to protect the masses from lone nuts and rogue governments when, in reality, it is the justification for what already has been engineered by psychopaths and sociopaths in positions of power within dominant governments and by their think-tank minions.  It is their hatred for the masses and subsequent policies that lead to what normal people call unthinkable scenarios.

Conclusion:  "I'm queasy about some billionaire with a messiah complex having a major role in geoengineering research," -- Clive Hamilton, Australian economist-ethicist.

It takes a lot more than a few billion dollars to orchestrate weather control, just as flight-school flunkies with box cutters, or a white supremacist in Oklahoma with a store-bought truck bomb cannot orchestrate large-scale terrorism. For a real messiah complex with money to back it, one needs a government sponsor.  This is misdirection right from the playbook . . . and that should make us queasy.

Naturally, "All discussions lead to the central theme of how to oversee research."  There it is: more control.  This control is hidden by our overseers in their "worry" that this new capability will lead to a Geoengineering Industrial Complex.  It is a pathetic echo of Eisenhower's famous speech warning of a Military Industrial Complex.  This is not a worry at all, as we are getting the message straight from The Four Horsemen's mouth.  These days such worries are not issued as a dire broadcast of the threat to individual liberty; they are sibilant whispers to a mainstream media peddling the message that only the eradication of individual liberty can save us all.


Read other articles by Michael Edwards Here



This article may be re-posted in full with attribution. http://www.activistpost.com/2011/04/masters-of-world-meet-to-play-god-with.html

This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 


Diana Moskovitz
This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 
No pictures. That’s what the biggest name in boxing, poised for one of the signature fights of his career, says over and over again when asked about the overwhelming evidence that he has a history of abusing women. Ignore the police reports, the court records, and his own plea deals, he says into the camera lens, never an ounce of doubt on his face, because there are no pictures. It’s a cliché of Internet life—pics or it didn’t happen—and one that Mayweather has leveraged into making it okay for millions of sports fans to plunk down $100 to watch him fight Manny Pacquiao without an ounce of doubt about putting money directly in the pocket of a misogynist.
To Rachel Nichols: “Once again, no pictures. Just hearsay and allegations.”
To Katie Couric: “Did I kick, stomp and beat someone? No, that didn’t happen. I look in your face and say, ‘No, that didn’t happen.’”
To Stephen A. Smith: “If I really did what they say I did, as far as beating a woman or stomping a woman, I’m Floyd Mayweather, they would have brought pictures out instantly. Still no pictures. No nothing.”
There are pictures, though. In at least two cases of domestic violence, official records show pictures were taken. In one case, a police report explicitly says that the photos show a victim’s injuries. But authorities in Las Vegas, a city poised to make millions off Floyd this weekend, have either destroyed the photos or haven’t released them.
When I first set out to get these pictures, I worried about what Deadspin would do if we got them. A month later, I haven’t seen a single image. Instead, I’ve gotten a crash course in how rules, regulations, and even old-fashioned “we’ll get back to you when we feel like it” attitudes keep the best evidence of Mayweather’s serial abuse of women under wraps.
Mayweather says “no pictures” and his adopted hometown, already raking in millions off of him, makes sure it stays that way. What happens in Vegas does stay in Vegas, especially if that’s good for Vegas. It’s by design. Here’s how.

Destroying the evidence

My first call was to the Clark County District Attorney’s Office, which told me to try the court records. Las Vegas has two separate levels of court, district and justice, and Mayweather has kept them busy. His name turns up in 29 separate cases in justice court criminal records and another 16 times at the district level on a slew of issues ranging from illegal parking to breach of contract to domestic violence. Felony and misdemeanor cases start at the justice level, while felony cases eventually move up to district.
Just three cases involving accusations of violence against Mayweather have gone up to district court. In two of those cases, district court spokeswoman Mary Ann Price told me, no exhibits were submitted to the court. In the third case, six photographs were admitted.
This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 
What was on the photos isn’t said, but they’re from the case brought by prosecutors after Josie Harris told police Mayweather kicked and punched her inside his Bentley, then dragged her out by her hair. By the time the trial came around, Harris told a different story, saying she lied in her police report, and Mayweather was acquitted.
As for the photos, they’ve been destroyed.
Is that legal? In Nevada, absolutely. UNLV associate law professor Sara Gordon said that in Nevada criminal cases anyone involved in a criminal case can apply for an order asking that exhibits be released or destroyed. If they are acquitted (and Floyd was) they can apply immediately afterward. “In considering the application,” Gordon said, “the court considers whether the loss of the evidence would prejudice any parties in ongoing cases or in the event of a retrial, and whether there are any appeals pending in the case.”
In this case, the order for disposal came on Oct. 11, 2011, while another set of domestic violence charges against Floyd worked their way through the Las Vegas court system. In that case, once again Floyd was accused of beating Harris, this time while their young children watched. The request for disposal is half a page and signed by a district judge.
This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 
Records show that before the exhibits were destroyed, Mayweather’s Vegas lawyers, Richard A. Wright and Karen Winckler, asked that the exhibits be released to them, and district Judge Lisa Marie Bell approved their request. On Dec. 29, the clerk of the court filed a petition and order that the records be disposed of or destroyed because “the exhibits are believed by the Clerk to be of no value which would warrant their delivery to the Board of County Commissioners of Clark County, Nevada, as property of said County.” It was reviewed by a prosecutor and, on Jan. 23, 2012, signed off on by a district judge.
In February, the exhibits were certified as destroyed.
This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 
This was two months after Mayweather took a plea deal in his other domestic violence case. In that case, photos were taken, but nobody who has them in Vegas wants you to see them.

Locking the evidence away from the public

In the early hours of of Sept. 9, 2010, Harris found Mayweather inside her home, which Mayweather still owned despite their breakup. A fight about the house being a little messy devolved into Mayweather being upset that Harris was seeing another man, and Harris called the police, according to the report. Mayweather left, then came back about 5 a.m. with a friend. One of Mayweather’s children let him inside. Harris, asleep on the couch, woke up to Mayweather holding her phone and screaming, “Are you having sex with C.J.?” She answered yes, and the beating began—as their children watched.
Mayweather grabbed Harris by her hair and began striking her in the back of her head with a closed fist several times. Mayweather pulled Harris off the couch by her hair and twisted her left arm. Harris stated that Mayweather began yelling at Harris “I’m going to kill you and the man your are messing around with.” He also stated “Im going to have you both disappear.” Harris tried to fight him off of her, and she thought he was trying to break her arm by twisting it behind her back. Harris screamed for the kids to call the police or run to the security guard station. Mayweather turned to the kids and yelled at them that “He would beat their asses if they left the house or called the police.” The children were able to get out of the house and run to the security guard station.
The police report noted “Schmidt also took digital photographs of Harris’ injuries and downloaded them into the LVMPD on-base system.”
One of Mayweather’s sons, Koraun, wrote a statement for police about what he saw that night. In the chunky writing of a child, Koraun describes watching his father pummel his mother and signs with the kind of signature usually saved for birthday cards or letters to Santa.
This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 
This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 
Despite the photos, Harris’s statement, and Koraun’s gripping account, this case never made it out of justice court. Before that could happen, Mayweather pleaded guilty to a reduced battery domestic violence charge and no contest to two harassment charges and got a 90-day jail sentence, which was delayed until after his Cinco de Mayo fight. Ultimately, Floyd didn’t even serve the full 90 days, instead getting out after two months thanks to good behavior.
Thanks to his early plea deal, any photos of Mayweather’s night of terror remain just one of 11 justice court case files that require a judge’s permission to fully unlock.

Releasing the files that don’t make Mayweather look too bad

To view an entire case file, and not just the selections deemed public, I was told I needed to file a motion for “disclosure of non-public information.” I filed 11 motions for all 11 justice court files that involved charges of violence or harassment and Mayweather. A judge says yes or no, deciding what of the non-public information will be released. Here is what I told the justice court, making it clear my concern was his violence toward women:
Floyd Mayweather is a public figure and important member of the Las Vegas community. He also has said publicly that there is no evidence of him hitting women. He told Rachel Nichols on CNN, “Once again, no pictures. Just hearsay and allegations. And I signed a plea-bargain. Once again, not true.” To show if he is telling the truth or not, it is important to review all of his case files.
So far I have received four files—and they mostly detail his violence toward men.
Within a week, and with relative ease, I got a file from a 2001 case in which Mayweather was charged with battery with use of a deadly weapon, but the file ends when Mayweather’s case is moved to district court, where the charge was dismissed, and the scant eight pages provided don’t even describe the events leading up to the battery or whom Mayweather hurt. The date of the incident it mentions, though—June 19, 2001—suggest it’s connected to when Mayweather was accused by a man of breaking a champagne bottle over his head at a Las Vegas night club.
I got the full complaint and only slightly redacted arrest report (three pages in total) from when Mayweather was accused in 2010 of jabbing a male security officer in the cheek. Mayweather pleaded no contest.
By far the lengthiest file I got—a full 18 pages—was from 2011, when Floyd was charged with two counts of misdemeanor harassment after threatening two security guards over parking tickets. The criminal complaint said Mayweather told them that his crew had guns and Mayweather would call them to come over and “take care of” them.” Mayweather was found not guilty, although not before Mayweather’s legal team offered a bizarre solution, one guard told the Las Vegas Review-Journal: Would the guard want the case dismissed if in return Mayweather “apologized, shook his hand and gave him tickets to his next fight”? (He declined.)
The fourth case is the only one that involved a woman, and it’s possibly the most minor of all the accusations against Mayweather. It’s an old misdemeanor case—Mayweather was accused of grabbing a woman by the shirt and shaking her back and forth—from more than a decade ago. It was quickly dismissed when nobody, including the woman involved, showed up for the trial.
As for all those other files, I got an email on April 9 asking me to clarify my request on three files, so I narrowed what I wanted to any documentation, photographs, or evidence that showed Mayweather’s violence toward women. If evidence had been destroyed, I also asked for copies of the documentation showing the destruction.
Today, I called and emailed the justice court staff attorney asking for an update. Before justice court closed, all I got was an update on one case, saying the file would cost $485.50.
This Is How Las Vegas Protects Floyd Mayweather 
Tommasino suggested a narrow request could be filled faster, so I resent him what I had sent another member of the legal staff on April 9. Before the close of justice court at 4 p.m. PST today, I hadn’t heard back.

Las Vegas police give the full runaround

I reached out to the Clark County District Attorney’s Office a second time, this time with a formal written request for any photos. They responded that the “legal custodian” of the photographs was the Las Vegas police department. I already had sent the police department an email asking for “copies of any photos taken or collected as part of the various battery, stalking, harassment, and coercion investigations involving Floyd Mayweather.” My request asked that the police department get back to me by email or phone if they had any questions or needed more information to fulfill my request.
I didn’t hear back for a week, so I called and asked what had happened to my request. I was told by the public information office that they needed more information to process it. When I asked why nobody had told me this earlier (my email explicitly said to reach to me if they needed more information) the response was that they hadn’t gotten to my request yet.
The next day, Friday, I sent them a list with every detail for every case that I knew of involving Mayweather and accusations of violence involving women. It included names of victims, birthdates, locations, court case numbers, and in one case the police report number as well.
I didn’t hear back, so I called Monday and left a message. This was the response I got from Officer Jesse Roybal. (It should be noted that I gave Las Vegas police the same type of information I’ve used to request police files across the country.)
Good afternoon. Unfortunately these numbers refer to the court case. We do not track our reports through this system. We track our reports via an LVMPD event number. I am not sure if we will be able to locate the reports. I will see what we can find out, however if you are able to help us we will try and track down the events. Thank you.
Perhaps he didn’t notice that in one case I did include the police report number, or that I included names, dates, and locations, which also can be used by agencies to locate cases.
So I wrote back, asking what other information he needed and offering to send along press reports from some of the more high-profile arrests.
That got me this response:
Good afternoon. I have some of my records researchers attempting to locate these reports at this time. I do not know how long it will take to locate them.
I wrote explaining that all I was looking for was photographs or images, not the reports. I checked in again the next day and was told Roybal was “still trying to track down these events.” He asked me to check in with the Clark County District Attorney or Las Vegas City Attorney because “they may have the photos accessible already.”
Of course, I had already checked in with the district attorney’s office, and they were the ones who sent me to the police. I wrote back saying I had already tried that route and offered to narrow it down to two cases which I knew were very high-profile and had pictures. My email back included the name of the victim, her birthdate, the approximate time of the beating, anda copy of the the 2010 police report that detailed what happened and noted that pictures had been taken.
This was the response:
Good afternoon. Regarding your request for photos, we are unable to fulfill this request. There are retention periods where some of these events would not be accessible due to policy concerning the retention period. Further, due to the intimate nature of the photos, in addition to the privacy and evidentiary nature of the photos, they will not be released. Any photos that were entered into evidence during an open court proceeding can be attempted to be released by contacting the court of jurisdiction. Thank you for your understanding in this matter.
In other words, I need to get them from the courts—the same courts that have either destroyed the photos or still haven’t decided if I can see the full case files. So that’s how this works.

Victims with conflicting interests

There are other custodians of the images showing the horror Mayweather inflicts: the women he beats. The most candid is Harris, who has given several interviews over the years. In a recent article, Harris said she has photographs of the damage Mayweather inflicted, but won’t release them because, she told Brandon Sneed, she doesn’t want to hurt him.
She doesn’t want to hurt Mayweather, to make him suffer any more than she thinks he already does. She could. She has pictures of what his abuse has done to her, but she hasn’t released them, for some of the same reasons she has lied for him, which she did many times after many assaults over many years—protecting him from the police, keep him out of prison, trying to save him.
“I don’t think that somebody who loves themselves correctly abuses other people,” she says. “Because loving somebody—the most important part is loving yourself first, right?”
This is perhaps the cruelest part of the victims Mayweather chooses. They’re mostly women who have emotional relationships with him, sometimes even children with him. They still care for him, despite the bruises, concussions, and death threats, because domestic violence is a cycle of power and control that is difficult to escape. Like many domestic abusers, Mayweather wins them back with apologies, lavish gifts, and promises he’ll never do it again—taking advantage of his power and control over them—and then hits them again.
The same feelings that make it so hard to break out of an abusive relationship make it hard to release the surest proof that Mayweather beats women. It’s easy to throw everything you have at a stranger on the street who slugs you in the face. It’s not easy to do the same with the father of your children.

Las Vegas was built to do this

Somehow, this whole tragedy makes sense once the context comes into consideration. The sun-baked desert dream machine of Las Vegas, a city built into a modern paradise by the mob, was once an “open city” for all family members; today it’s just as open—or conveniently closed—for the likes of Mayweather. His biggest-ever fight is pouring dollars into the city ravaged by foreclosures just a few years ago. Few have any interest in turning off the tap.
The idea of an American city bending over backward for quick and easy cash isn’t new. What’s special about Las Vegas is the openness with which it happens, as if this is just how business is done. In 2006, the Los Angeles Times outlined a “stacked judicial deck” in the city, thick with cronyism and conflicts of interest, where big donations by lawyers equate to favorable rulings from judges. A ballot initiative that hoped to fix this failed. More recently, the city has been the home of right-wing sugar daddy Sheldon Adelson, whose company might have bribed foreign officials.
And a justice of the peace can be openly swayed to delay a man’s sentence, despite multiple allegations of abuse, because his fights make money. As the Associated Press explained in 2012:
[Justice of the peace Melissa] Saragosa said she was swayed by the last-minute plea from Mayweather’s lawyer, Richard Wright, to let Mayweather postpone jail time so he can train to fight on the May 5 date his promoters promised months ago to pay-per-view television and the MGM Grand Garden Arena in Las Vegas.
Wright said Mayweather wasn’t trying to avoid the sentence, and emphasized the potential economic benefit of attracting fight fans and hotel guests to Las Vegas for a Mayweather fight. The lawyer estimated that Mayweather’s last seven fights in Las Vegas generated a combined $1 billion in business to the community. He projected the economic boost from a May 5 fight at more than $100 million.
The projected pot from Mayweather’s upcoming battle is even greater. Marquee hotels have jacked up their prices. Las Vegas sports books are so awash in bets that a $200,000 straight wager on either boxer can be taken without managerial approval. Even a cab driver picking up people at the airport told sports writer Jerry Izenberg that he felt the difference.
“The summer was lousy. I don’t know where you are from but if you got money, this town needs you. You do have money? The gas thing killed us in June and July with those people who used to drive over from L.A. With the big auto workers and steel people layoffs back East, forget the blue-collar trade. You can even forget those school teachers from Iowa.”
“So the fight means a lot?” I asked him.
“The fight means everything.”
And of course all the brisk business is good for the Nevada Athletic Commission, which collects six percent tax on gross tickets sales to boxing and mixed martial arts events. Earlier this month, a Nevada state lawmaker asked to raise the tax from six to eight percent.

Why there will probably never be pictures

We shouldn’t need to see the pictures. The overwhelming evidence should be enough. The guilty and no contest pleas should be enough. The words of so many women should be enough. But seeing pictures—in all their grotesqueness and horror—is unfortunately the only way to prove a man hit a woman. It’s part of why officers take these pictures, to show a judge and a jury what happened.
“When you’re in a front of a judge, you describe the injuries written in the complaint, the bruising, the swelling, the blood,” prosecutor Scott E. Kessler told the New York Times for a 2007 story about how digital cameras were changing domestic violence investigations. “But until a person sees another human being with those injuries, with the swelling, the blood, the bruising, it’s hard to get that point across.”
He was proven right last year, when TMZ published the video of Ray Rice knocking out his future wife, Janay, with one swift punch. Before the video was published, Rice was poised to return to football after a short suspension. Afterward, Rice was gone for an entire season and dumped by his team. He’s still searching for a chance to play.
There has been no elevator-tape moment for Mayweather, though, despite his long and well-documented history of beating up women, and there probably never will be.
Las Vegas has made sure of it.
Image via Getty