---BREAKAWAY CIVILIZATION ---ALTERNATIVE HISTORY---NEW BUSINESS MODELS--- ROCK & ROLL 'S STRANGE BEGINNINGS---SERIAL KILLERS---YEA AND THAT BAD WORD "CONSPIRACY"--- AMERICANS DON'T EXPLORE ANYTHING ANYMORE.WE JUST CONSUME AND DIE.---
This
last week, as I indicated a few days ago, has been a very strange week
for space news, stories that you may have missed with all the focus on
BREXIT and its implications. What I noticed, however, is a strange sense
of timing hovers over them, as they're all coming out more or
less in the same time window. And, as has become a familiar pattern,
curiously it's the Russian media sources that are giving them play. Many
regular readers here contributed many of these articles, so let's start
with this first one: a video of a US Army recruiment campaign, clearly
referencing "combat with aliens" both at the beginning, and at the end: Ok, so what, you say? Well, on its own it's not too significant. But
combine that with recent Boeing stupor-bowl halftime commercials,
statements by General Kinney at military gatherings that we have to be
ready to fight "ETs", and other high strangeness coming out of the
military-industrial complex (think Lockheed-Martin in Antarctica here),
and I cannot help but get the distinct impression-intuition-suspicion (I
don't know quite what to call it), that "something is up" and that
we're slowly being prepared for "it". Then there was this, from Russia's Sputnik, and I cannot help but ponder this strange article: http://sputniknews.com/world/20160621/1041648568/new-vision-innovates-space-warfare.html Now, when one reads this article in depth, there is of course no
reference to "fighting beyond the stars" or "aliens" or "ET" or anything
of the sort. But it is Sputnik's choice of title and sub-title for the
article that intrigues me. The title - "Space Weapons: The US
Seeks to Innovate How America Fights Beyond the Stars" - does compel
certain speculations and imaginations, for note the use of the present
tense, not the future tense: How America Fights beyond the stars, not, How America will
fight beyond the stars, &c. Shades of British computer hacker Gary
McKinnon, who claimed to have hacked into US Department of Defense
computers, and have found curious reference to a hidden "space fleet".
Of course, we know what happened to him: the US pitched a hissy-fit,
demanded extradition from Britain, so it could throw him into a deep
dark hole. Britain refused. (And that, to my mind, was suspicious in
itself, in today's terrorism and hacking-conscious age, when allies are
supposed to "stick together," unless of course, his hacking was perhaps
tied to MI-6? "Just what are the colonies doing up there?"
&c. McKinnon's protection by the British government I always found
to be as suspicious as the hack itself). Then there's the sub-title to the Sputnik article: The Air
Force has devised a new framework for interstellar warfare called Space
Enterprise Vision." Now, I don't for a moment attach much suspicion to
the US AIr Force having war plans for wars against some off planet
invader. General staffs do this sort of thing all the time, and it would
be the height of irrationality to assume that the US Air Force, Royal
Air Force, Luftwaffe, Royal Canadian Air Force, and so on, do not
have such plans in their safes, and that they do not wargame such
events. From time to time we hear stories of such wargames. No surprise
there. What is interesting about this subtitle is that this is
being done under the aegis of something called "Space Enterprise
Vision," in other words, as I've been arguing, if you're going to
commericalize and privatize space, you have to "protect the sea lanes"
and that requires, so to speak, "ships of the line", i.e., great big
platforms carrying lots of guns hiding behind thick wooden planking
designed to slug it out with anyone presuming to interdict those sea
lanes. You get the idea: the commercialization of space implies - and
requires - its weaponization. Obviously the focus of the article itself is on terrestrial
possibilities and a potential enemy's "bright lines" or trigger points,
the lines in space that we, or they, cannot or should not cross without
triggering a "major incident", the polite euphemism of such studies for
"war." But it takes little imagination to see that such studies could
be, and probably are, extrapolated to deal with "other" potential
enemies. THen there were these stories, shared by Mr. S.D.: Russian space agency unveils grandiose plan to permanently base a dozen cosmonauts on the moon Experts says a 'space base' halfway between the Moon and Earth could be built in 10 years The first article reveals the basic plan for a permanent Russian
human presence on the Moon, and the plans are similar to other plans
being advanced in Europe, China, and the USA:
They said the process of constructing the base would be
done in stages, likely extending over a decade or more. The agency is
reportedly developing a rocket to transport portions of the base to the
moon over six separate launches. It is a grandiose undertaking for a space agency that saw its
projected budget for 2016-2025 trimmed by more than half last year,
falling to a commitment of 1.5 trillion rubles, or roughly $30 billion. In May, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin told Interfax, a
non-governmental Russian news agency, that “Russia will never catch up
to the United States in the space race.” He claimed Roscosmos had fallen
behind NASA and SpaceX founder Elon Musk by “ninefold.”
What's going on here? I suspect simply that this means Russia intends to be a part
of this lunar base effort, rather than to attempt it on its own.
However, it has an advantage that few appreciate: it has studied long
term effects of zero and lower gravity on the ISS and its MIR space
stations, and also has a large, servicable, and workable booster
technology. As we also saw earlier this week, Russia is also investing
money in the development of cyber technologies, including robotics: the
presence of any Russian components in such an international mission
would eventually and most likely require a Russian presence to service
them. Keep that "international" component in mind here, because it will
bear fruit in tomorrow's blog I've blogged about the second article before, i.e., about the idea of
basing a space station halfway between the Earth and the Moon. It would
be, as the article notes, a rational place to position a station, one
not only designed to replace the International Space Station, but as a
base for lunar expeditions and other solar system expeditions. Note also
that this is coming from the German....er.... European Space Agency.
Note that the station is to be placed in an orbit at the equigravisphere
between the Earth and the Moon:
"Let me take you on a thought experiment about 10 years
into the future," David Parker, the ESA's Director of Human Spaceflight
and Robotic Exploration, told the media at a press conference in Germany this week, celebrating the safe return of British astronaut Tim Peake to Earth. "After 25 years of service, the International Space Station is coming
to the end of its life, but now 1,000 times further out in space a new
star has risen," he added. "A human outpost in deep space, located far out, where Earth and [the] Moon's gravity balance, a kind of crossroads in space." According to Parker, the remote location of the space base would mean
it could serve as much more than just a replacement for the ISS,
enabling new kinds of scientific study in space – and chiefly, far
greater access to the Moon. "This is our deep space habitat, a new place to live and learn how to
work in space, a kind of base camp for exploring the Solar System and
reaching back down to the surface of the Moon," he said.
"[Astronauts] can look down on a Moon untroubled by humans in more than
50 years. We want to go back there, we've barely scratched the
surface."
Now, this story and idea appeared before, but note the date: it is
being trotted out again, and within the same time frame as the other
stories. The choice of the equigravispherical orbit is also logical,
both from a practical, scientific, and needless to say, military point
of view. So what's going on? Well, for that, we'll have to await the high octane speculations of tomorrow's blog:
Everyone
is familiar with the spacefaring exploits of the USSA’s National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Russian space program
and the European Space Agency (ESA). The increasingly sophisticated
Chinese space program is also well known internationally. But
for years there has been quiet talk of another space program, a secret
space program, a covert consortium, if you will, that operates quietly
out of the public eye, drawing on the expertise, technology and
personnel of major aerospace corporations, major military agencies and
the publicly known space agencies and using all of those organizations
and bureaucracies as a cover for clandestine space projects carried out
in great secrecy. It seems like an outlandish idea at first blush. But
there is evidence that points in that direction.
Project Dyna-Soar
Most people have never heard of the USSA Air Force’s preparations for the so-called Dyna-Soar manned space program
in the late 1950s and early 1960s. Dyna-Soar was based on the 1930s
theoretical boost-glide space plane concept of the 20th Century German
scientist, Eugen Sänger. Nazi rocket expert, SS General Walter
Dornberger, was brought to the USA by Project Paperclip after World War
II and carried along schematics and blueprints for a rocket launched
space plane based on Eugen Sänger’s earlier work. In my book, Hidden in Plain Sight: Beyond the X-Files,
I reference two Project Paperclip memoranda from 1947 that explicitly
asked for both SS General Dornberger and Eugen Sänger to be brought over
to the USSA under Project Paperclip.
General Dornberger was
brought over and worked for Bell Aircraft, in upstate New York, where
he advanced the space plane concept under the guise of the USSA's Air
Force’s Dyna-Soar project. Initially, Bell’s design for the Dyna-Soar
was the leading concept, but then the Air Force decided to award the
project to Boeing instead. (The best history that I have seen of this
project, and its Nazi antecedents, is the conference article by William
C. Walter, Project Dyna-Soar: The Roots of Shuttle - A Memoir,
IAA-92-0193, 43rd Congress of the International Astronautical
Federation, August 28-September 5, 1992, Washington, DC (International
Astronautical Federation, 3-5 Rue Mario-Nikis, 75015 Paris, France). In
plain English, NASA's space shuttle was not home-grown American
technology. It actually was an outgrowth of a concept based on Nazi
research and plans dating back to the era of the Third Reich, in the
1930s and 1940s, albeit that it took the USSA a few decades after WW-II
to build and fly a spacecraft that resembled the original Nazi concept.
The original intent was to orbit the Dyna-Soar. Publicly, that program
was shut down; however, with a delay of over a decade the Space Shuttle,
a larger, boost-glide, space plane was launched and did orbit hundreds
of astronauts.
Interestingly,
Neil Armstrong, the celebrated first man to walk on the moon in NASA’s
Apollo space program, was one of the Dyna-Soar space plane astronauts
before he left Dyna-Soar to train with NASA. Eventually, after spending a
lot of money and time, and training a Dyna-Soar astronaut corps, the
Air Force publicly announced that it was shutting down the program,
allegedly without ever putting any Dyna-Soar astronauts into space.
The Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL)
The USSA Air Force also planned to establish a Manned Orbiting Laboratory (MOL),
and in the period 1965-1967 selected yet another corps of military
astronauts. The Air Force’s MOL astronaut corps operated in parallel to
the NASA manned space program’s astronaut corps. But then, as with the
earlier Dyna-Soar program, the Air Force announced that it was shutting
down the MOL program.
Project Horizon
And then there were the USSA Army's plans for a major program to establish a manned outpost on the Moon. It was called Project Horizon
and projected scores of Saturn rocket launches of men and materiel into
space, to construct a manned lunar base by 1966. Officially, nothing
like this came to concrete realization, and the first Apollo astronauts
did not set foot on the lunar surface until 1969, three years after the
projected date of completion of the USSA Army's planned, manned lunar
base.
The
public record therefore shows that the USSA military planned at least
three manned space programs in the 1950s and 1960s (Dyna-Soar, the MOL
and Project Horizon) that were distinctly separate from the NASA
Mercury, Gemini and Apollo programs. The Air Force trained its own
military astronauts for the Dyna-Soar and MOL programs, before very
publicly shutting them down for ostensible lack of funding and political
support.
The USSA Military's Parallel Secret Space Shuttle Program
But
was the story presented to the public really the whole story? The
question has to be asked, because in August of 1989 the U.S. Air Force
announced for yet a third time that it was shutting down another, this
time secret, manned space program that it again intended to run parallel to that of NASA’s manned space program.
In this case the Pentagon had spent $3.3 billion dollars to build its
own space shuttle launch facility at Vandenberg Air Force Base in
California, a launch control facility in Colorado, and had a secret
cadre of 32 military astronauts. Mind
you, none of this was public knowledge until the 1989 announcement by
the Air Force that it had disbanded its secret, previously unknown,
astronaut corps, that it was “mothballing” its space shuttle launch
facility at Vandenberg AFB, and that it was abandoning its space shuttle
program. There were therefore three publicly acknowledged efforts by
the U.S. military over a 30 year period to establish its own manned
space programs. In each case, the programs were publicly shut down, but
only after first going to elaborate and costly lengths of training
astronauts, developing technology and spending multiple billions of
dollars. This represents quite a lot of repeated effort over a period of
decades to obtain a null result. Unless
of course, this repeated exercise over a 30 year period was but a
costly charade carefully calculated to deflect scrutiny from other
military programs that actually have secretly put men into space.
I
have often wondered whether something like the USSA Army's Project
Horizon (see above) may even now be in secret operation, with manned
outposts on the Moon, and perhaps elsewhere in the solar system, and
even farther afield in the galaxy. Curious Case of Gary McKinnon Which brings me directly to the curious case of Gary McKinnon,
the British computer hacker who was hauled up on serious criminal
charges by the U.S. government for hacking into U.S. government and
military computer networks. As of early 2010 McKinnon was facing 70
years in prison for hacking into U.S. Space Command computers, where he
alleges to have seen computer files with lists of Non-Terrestrial
Officers’ names, and records of fleet to fleet transfers containing
names of ships that he says were not U.S. Navy ships. What he saw caused
him to believe that the U.S. military has a secret space fleet and that
the ships’ names that he viewed belong to that secret space fleet.
Be
that as it may, whatever it was that he saw caused the U.S. Government
to go to unusual lengths to try to extradite Gary McKinnon to the USA
and criminally prosecute and imprison him for the rest of his natural
life. Judging by the extreme reaction of the U.S. Government to what
would seem to be an otherwise comparatively minor hacking incident,
maybe it really does have a secret space fleet. Maybe that’s why it went
after Gary McKinnon so aggressively. Maybe the repeated, publicly
“failed” or abandoned attempts by the U.S. Air Force to establish a
separate, military, manned space program were just covers for another,
more secretive manned space program that had quietly flown beneath the
radar of public awareness until a bumbling British hacker stumbled
across it. Area 51
In
that vein, much speculation has focused on the famous Area 51 in
Nevada, and the Lockheed Corporation’s famous “Skunk Words” in
California, as sites where secret spacecraft may have been developed and
built. After all, it was Lockheed’s “Skunk Works” where super-secret
aircraft such as the U-2, SR-71 Blackbird and F-117 stealth fighter were
designed and built. And Area 51 is widely assumed to be a place where
reverse engineering of recovered extraterrestrial technology takes
place.
One
of the most interesting anecdotal accounts of the extraterrestrial
technology held at Area 51 that I have seen appeared in a 2002 Robert
Stanley interview with David Adair in NEXUS Magazine. (Robert M.
Stanley, “Electromagnetic Fusion and ET Space Technology,” NEXUS New Times Magazine
USA/Canadian Edition, vol. 9, no. 5 (September-October 2002): 53-57,
74-75.) Briefly, Adair says that in 1971 he was taken underground at
Area 51 to a mammoth, underground, work space where he saw many exotic
craft, including a large, bus-sized, fusion engine that was so exotic
and sophisticated that it was clear to him that it was of
extraterrestrial manufacture and could not have been made on Earth. The
plain implication is that the military-industrial complex of the USA has
extraterrestrial space engines. We Now Have The Technology To Take E.T. Home
But it was the dramatic comments in 1993 of Ben Rich, director of the Lockheed Skunk Works
from 1975 to 1990, that conclusively revealed that great technological
advances have been made in the black world of compartmentalized
programs. In March of 1993 Rich presented a talk to an engineering
alumni meeting at the University of California- Los Angeles (UCLA). Jan
Harzen, a Boeing executive and Director of the Mutual UFO Network’s
Orange County section, was present in the audience that day. Harzan
witnessed Rich show a slide of a black flying disk headed into outer
space and tell the audience of engineers, “We now have the technology to
take E.T. home.”
Ben
Rich went on to say that by making changes in unspecified mathematical
equations there had been an engineering breakthrough and that it did not
take long to travel to other stars. In recent years, a letter written
by Rich in 1986 has also come to light in which he wrote: “Many of our
manmade UFOs are Un Funded Opportunities.” This comment by Ben Rich
clearly refers to black budget, off the books projects and technology.
The clear reference to “manmade UFOs” is unambiguous and carries extra
weight coming from Rich, who was an insider’s insider in the American
military-industrial complex, particularly in the secretive world of
high-tech, cutting edge, aerospace technology.
Information From My Own Sources And Research I
must say that none of this surprises me in the least. My personal view
is that manned space flight in the modern era likely began in the early
1950s, a full decade before the Russians and Americans began publicly
catapulting astronauts and cosmonauts into space in hypersonic tomato
cans called "space capsules." My
belief is that from the time of the Third Reich on (or even before)
electrogravitics, antigravity and other modes of propulsion were being
explored. I have explained my thinking and observations at length in
previous blog posts, among others: Nazi Vril Kaleidoscopic Merry-Go-Round, Unthinkable Torsion Secrets Of Our Most Recondite Delusion and Vorticular Madness Of The Dark Magicians
. The work of T. Townsend Brown, Charles Dellschau, the Nazi scientists
and engineers, and a host of others, as well as the technology
recovered from the Roswell UFO crash in 1947 and other UFO crashes,
absolutely did not escape the notice of the planners behind Project
Paperclip, the Manhattan Project, MJ-12, the Jason Group, Project Rand
and other organizations and research groups dealing with exotic and
cutting edge technology. In fact, the modern space effort appears to
have begun in earnest many decades ago. In my book, Kundalini Tales,
I very briefly refer to a clear telepathic communication that I
received from Robert Monroe, the well-known out-of-body explorer and
author who founded The Monroe Institute in Faber, Virginia. For whatever
reason, I had a fair amount of telepathic contact with Robert Monroe
over the years. Of course, he is not presently physically alive. In
about 1981, he telepathically communicated to me that the first men went
into space in 1951 (not 1961) and that the first space missions
revealed that there were certain esoteric aspects to space travel,
things that NASA, for instance, has never publicly revealed.
Essentially, there is a deeply magical or mystical aspect of space
travel -- it's not all nuts and bolts, hard engineering. There are
certain key times and places, and specific manners in which you can send
men to space. If the proper protocols are not observed the missions do
not succeed. That was the gist of what he communicated to me. More
than that, other information I have received has suggested that the
huge black triangles that so many people have seen, in different regions
of the world, are a compartmentalized, Black Project of major aerospace
companies that uses plasma technology as a propulsive force. The
observed performance of the craft is consistent with some sort of
alectrogravitic or antigravity technology. The same is probably true for
the Nazi Vril-style flying saucers that have been repeatedly seen over
the years.
I
would also observe that when I was researching my first book on
underground bases and tunnels, I ran across a technical document that
mentioned a planned, nuclear powered, tunnel boring machine called a Subselene, designed to excavate tunnels beneath the Moon's surface. I briefly mention the Subselene toward the end of the book. The document even estimated the cost of transporting the machine to the Moon, without, however, specifying exactly how that would be done. At the time, I wondered to myself if that could perhaps be done with a big, heavy lift, black triangle. Twenty years later, I am still wondering about that. Bottom Line The
bottom line is that the available evidence indicates the likely
existence of at least one classified, military space program using
chemical rocket technology, and operating clandestinely, in parallel to
the NASA manned space program. Additionally, the comments of Ben Rich
and the remarks of David Adair indicate the probable existence of at
least one other highly secret space program, using unconventional space
technology, also operating in parallel to the NASA manned space program.
The aggressive pursuit of criminal charges by the American government
against the British hacker, Gary McKinnon, who alleges to have seen
evidence of a secret U.S. military space fleet also points to a secret
American space program. The
black budget is massive, running into the hundreds of billions, even
trillions of dollars. The evidence strongly indicates that a lot of that
money has gone into secretive activities in space about which we have
never been informed. At places like Area 51, Vandenberg Air Force Base,
White Sands Missile Range, Edwards Air Force Base, Cape Canaveral and
elsewhere there are profound secrets about space and space travel that
have been held back from the American people. The
general public have been massively lied to. The time has come that we
learned the truth about what happens in those places, the many
discoveries and breakthroughs that have been made, and the technology
that is in use.
Posts
