Saturday, March 2, 2013

Google Glass, Enhanced Reality, and ‘The Game’

Share
gamestartrekng
Wesley Crusher and friend pretend to play ‘the game’ as they search for a cure for their shipmates.
I‘m including this article under the category ‘Hollywood and the Coming Apocalypse’, but it might more accurately be included under ‘the Coming ZOMBIE Apocalypse’. Why? It’s all about ‘The Game’.
Years ago, probably far more than most under the age of twenty would recall, the producers of Star Trek-Next Generation gave us a preview of our own future. The beautifully written teleplay by Brannon Braga, titled ‘The Game’, features an addictive headpiece, straight-to-the-brain kind of video game designed by a race called the Ktarians. Commader Riker has returned from a vacation on Risa, where he’s met the lovely Etana Jol, a Ktarian female. Riker extols the joys of ‘the game’ and makes copies for distribution throughout the ship.
game2startrekng
‘Real world view’ while playing ‘the game’.
However, what appears to be harmless fun soon turns to terror as more and more people turn to brain-dead zombies, including Dr. Beverly Crusher. The object of the game is rather simple (just drop an image into a hole–sort of like playing Angry Birds or Cut the Rope) but the reward for getting it right is a shot of stimulation right to the brain’s pleasure center. Need I say that the game is a major hit? Dr. Crusher is not only useless as a physician, she switches off Data and plays ‘doctor’ with the android’s circuitry, effectively making him useless. The real ‘mission’ behind these games, you see, is that the Ktarians intend to board the Enterprise, and they’d prefer no one try to stop them, including Data (whose silicon pathways render the game null and void). With all the humans subject to the slightest suggestion, the Ktarians have a clear field.
Wes Crusher and his friend Robin Lefler (shown top left) figure it out early on (of course, Wesley always knows best, right?), and they wear ‘dummy’ headgear while trying to sort it all out. I’ll not spoil it further, but suffice it to say the Enterprise appears to be in a pickle–and highly suggestive, or as I said earlier, ‘zombies’.
glass
Google Glass gives the user constant access to the internet.
Why am I telling you all this? Because Google has just introduced their new ‘Google Glass’ headset design that permits the wearer to interact constantly with the internet. Boy, you could really play Angry Birds with a vengeance now! No need to open up a laptop, no need even for your cell phone–you’re always connected; you’re always ‘engaged’. Note the design of the ‘game’ from Star Trek sends the image directly into the user’s eyes while allowing him/her to continue to see the real world (assuming the wearer even notices the real world once hooked). Google Glass reports to one eye, but allows the wearer to view the analog world while indulging in the digital one. Let’s just say, you might not want to wear it while driving or operating heavy machinery.
In today’s world, nearly everyone interacts on a computer at least once a day. Now, our younger generation needn’t worry about being ‘offline’. Texting, gaming, and Facebook posting will be constant–especially if you use the ‘glove’ that’s being touted as a means for ‘typing’ while wearing the ‘Glass’.
Like it or not, ‘enhanced reality’ is here. Cue the Zombie music.

A "Nobel Torsion Message" Over Norway?
Part I

By Richard C. Hoagland
© 2009 The Enterprise Mission


On the eve of the President of the United States, Barack Obama, receiving the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, Norway ... a remarkable, almost unbelievable appartition appeared over Norway's northern skies--
And no one ... really ... has a clue.


According to early news reports coming out of Norway, just hours ago ... a vast, rapidly expanding "spiral" suddenly appeared in the pre-dawn skies over its northern-most town, a fishing center called "Tromso" (above). Moments later, a corkscrewing "blue beam" seemed to emmanate from the exact center of the spiral toward the ground ....
Then, as rapidly as this "glowing spiral" and central "beam" appeared ... the bright core of this rapidly rotating spiral abruptly disappeared ... to be immediately replaced by what could only be described as --
A pitch black, rapidly enlarging circle (below) -- looking eerily like "an expanding black hole ..."


Within a few more hours, these extraordinary Norwegian videos and digital images were being picked up by other on-line news services, wire services and internet sites ... all over the world.


Another "indispensable wonder" of the 21st Century Internet ....
Initially, this visually spectacular event was thought by experts looking at those videos and images to be "just another Russian naval missile test"--
Until the Russian Navy denied it was responsible!
But then, in an abrupt public reversal, the Russian Defense Ministry suddenly claimed that this was, indeed, "a Russian rocket launch ...."
This belated (and 180-degree) lagging Russian "admission," unfortunately, has all the appearances of a hastily-ordered cover-up--
Of something "far more interesting" ....
The possible demonstration, on the literal eve of Obama's arrival in Oslo, of a blatantly public "Hyperdimensional/Torsion Physics technology" ... somehow, also connected to President's Obama's imminent acceptance of his Nobel Prize--
In conjunction with a carefully re-scheduled Russian missile test ....
Is it another "coincidence" that, just over the hill from Tromso, lies a high-tech Norwegian "HAARP antenna farm" -- the EISCAT Ramfjordmoen facility (below) -- specifically designed to broadcast powerful beams of microwave energy high into space ... thereby also creating blatant HD/torsion side-effects in the Earth's highly-electrified upper "plasma" atmosphere (ionosphere)? The facility is officially supported by Norway, Sweden, Finland, Japan ... China ... the United Kingdom ... and Germany.



A technology which -- with minor engineering effort -- could just as easily be turned into an almost unimaginable "torsion interferometry weapon" of mass destruction ... which, in a stroke, would usher in an even more terrifying "arms race" for the entire world ... if militarily deployed!?


Is this astounding apparition, in fact, a "Nobel message" to Obama ... as the most visible and currently powerful Peace Prize nominee in decades ... to alert him to the necessity of reining in these "even more horrific 'torsion weapons of mass destruction'"--
While there's still time?
A torsion weapons technology which -- if utilized inside the Earth's electrified atmosphere -- would appear just like the mysterious "vortex appartition over Norway" ....
Stay tuned.


-0-

A "Nobel Torsion Message" Over Norway?
Part II



By Richard C. Hoagland
© 2009 The Enterprise Mission


The spectacular aerial display appearing in the skies of northern Norway a few days ago -- still receiving incredulous reactions from around the world -- has generated a tidal wave of speculation:
"Was it a failed Russian missile?"
"A UFO?"
"Or ... another clandestine test of HAARP (the High Altitude Auroral Research Project which, it turns out, has several not-so-well-known facilities scattered across northern Scandinavia -- a Project steeped in its own multi-layered technology, mysteries and speculations ...)?"
The curiously delayed Russian admission that it had, indeed, conducted another routine missile test on Wednesday morning (when the mysterious "light spiral from Heaven," as papers in Norway are now referring to it, appeared), did nothing to quell this "speculation explosion"; in fact, it only added fuel ....
As we reported in Part I, when initially queried by Norwegian media, the Russian Navy, and the Russian Embassy in Norway, denied all knowledge of the phenomenon -- as well as any rumored "missile tests" they may have been conducting in the same time frame and area.
Only a day later did an AP story finally appear -- quoting the Russian Defense Ministry's eventual, official statement that, indeed "a Bulava missile was launched Wednesday by a nuclear submarine submerged in the White Sea ... and its third stage suffered an unspecified failure ...." (below). The story underscored, however, that this "limited offical Ministry acknowledgement" did NOT directly link that missile failure with the growing "Norwegian Spiral" story.
Noted AP--
"... the ministry did not confirm the lights were the result of the failed launch ... but [independent] military analysts said they clearly came from the Bulava explosion [emphasis added] ...."


This very carefully-worded official Defense Ministry admission (which has been misinterpretated by America media as "confirming that the Spiral was caused by their errant missile" ...), also accurately reported by Norwegian Television, raises serious new questions about the underlying facts and context surrounding this entire, extraordinary display ....
But -- perhaps not quite as many as the sudden appearance of this even more obvious "anomalous aerial phenomenon" (below) ....



Quoting:

(MYFOX NATIONAL) - It's a bird? It's a plane? Media reports indicate that hundreds of people spotted what appeared to be a triangular-shaped UFO flying in the skies above the Red Square in Moscow.
The Daily Mail reports that two separate amateur videos were shot, one during the day and one at night, that show the same object in the sky. The UFO made its appearance on Dec. 9, the same night mysterious lights were spotted in Norwegian skies [emphasis added] ....

The same night ....

* * *

The simultaneous appearance of two "UFOs" ... the still mysterious "spiral light over Norway" -- and that same day/night -- a "massive flying triangle," floating serenely over the heart of downtown Moscow--
Both obviously linked to Mother Russia--
Can hardly be treated as "a mere coincidence" ....
However, in the meantime, back in Norway ....
Below are the official parameters of the Bulava (Russian for "Mace") ICBM (also known as the "SS-NX-30" in NATO parlance); as can be seen, it is a three-stage, solid propellant launcher, carrying as many as ten independently targetable nuclear warheads (MIRVS). The latter are housed in a "maneuverable liquid-fueled canister" (or "bus") attached to the third stage -- which separates after burnout and, by maneuvering with small thrusters, positions each warhead during coast for its own reentry ... to its own designated target.
It is the liquid fuel carried in this MIRV "bus" (atop the three-stage solid fueled missile underneath) which is the focus of attention for those now totally believing that the amazing Norway display was simply caused by "this liquid fuel ... being sprayed out in a dramatic spiral into space, as the out-of-control third stage of the Bulava missile spun out of control across the Norwgian skies" ....


Manufacturer: MITT. Launches: 9. Failures: 4. Success Rate: 55.56%. First Launch Date: 2004-09-23. Last Launch Date: 2007-11-10. Launch data is: continuing. Apogee: 1,000 km (600 mi). Liftoff Thrust: 0 N ( lbf). Total Mass: 36,800 kg (81,100 lb). Core Diameter: 2.00 m (6.50 ft). Total Length: 12.10 m (39.60 ft). Maximum range: 10,500 km (6,500 mi). Number Standard Warheads: 10. Boost Propulsion: Solid rocket. Cruise Propulsion: Solid rocket. Stage 3 Propellants: Solid rocket. Guidance: Inertial + Stellar.
Stage1: 1 x Topol'-M-1. Gross Mass: 26,000 kg (57,000 lb). Empty Mass: 3,000 kg (6,600 lb). Motor: 1 x 15Zh58A. Thrust (vac): 980.000 kN (220,310 lbf). Burn time: 60 sec. Length: 8.50 m (27.80 ft). Diameter: 1.80 m (5.90 ft). Propellants: Solid.

Stage2: 1 x Topol'-M-2. Gross Mass: 13,000 kg (28,000 lb). Empty Mass: 1,500 kg (3,300 lb). Motor: 1 x 15Zh58B. Thrust (vac): 490.000 kN (110,150 lbf). Burn time: 64 sec. Length: 6.00 m (19.60 ft). Diameter: 1.55 m (5.08 ft). Propellants: Solid.

Stage3: 1 x Topol'-M-3. Gross Mass: 6,000 kg (13,200 lb). Empty Mass: 1,000 kg (2,200 lb). Motor: 1 x 15Zh58V. Thrust (vac): 245.000 kN (55,078 lbf). Burn time: 56 sec. Length: 3.10 m (10.10 ft). Diameter: 1.34 m (4.39 ft). Propellants: Solid.

 
Apart from whether this Russian rocket caused the amazing Norwegian light show, given these parameters of the Bulava ICBM, the timing of its latest test raises some extremely serious political questions re the real relationship between the leadership of the Russian Federation ... and the Obama Administration.
Like:
"Why would the Russian government conduct another launch of a new, offensive missile system -- and in the immediate vicinity of Norway -- on the literal eve of the President of the United States arriving in Oslo to accept his Nobel Peace Prize?"
Or:
"How would that Russian missile ... from a submarine supposedly located some 600 miles away from northern Norway (in the White Sea region - see below) ... even be visible (according to all reports ...) from only the comparatively tiny geographical region in western, northern Norway ..?!; if a missile caused the Spiral, why wasn't it also seen in Sweden ... Finland ... even in some western sections of northern Russia itself -- in those, also-beautifully-dark, because-the-sun-never-even-rises-at-this-time-of-year ... pre-dawn skies?!"

A quick look at a polar projection of this nominal "Russian arctic missile range" reveals exactly why these are distinctly "non-trivial" questions ....


As can be seen, if the first and second solid-rocket stages of this three-stage, sea-launched ballistic missile each fired successfully (as the Russians staunchly now maintain ...), the thrust from the first two stages would have taken the rising 38-ton Bulava several hundred miles to the northeast ... and to an altitude in those first 2 minutes of flight (check the burn times for stages 1 & 2) approaching 100 miles -- more than high enough to be seen by anyone (weather permitting) over an area of literally millions of square miles ... covering northern Norway, Sweden, Finland ... AND Russia!
Why then -- if the "spiral" was simply the product of nothing more exotic than "a spectacular failure of the Bulava's third stage bus ..." -- wasn't it reported and photographed by literally tens of thousands of folks scattered across these northern nations ... home to potentially millions of curious on lookers ...?
Most (these days) equipped with inexpensive, ubiquitous cell phone cameras ..?!


A better to way to see this profound contradiction -- between the official military "explanation" (Russian and Norwegian ... with Sweden and Finland's military being deafeningly quiet ...) is to refer to a helpful 3-D visualization (below).


This is the northern hemisphere, as seen from a point in space located roughly over the latitude of Tromso, Norway (site of many of the original reports) -- at ~70 degrees N.
As can easily be seen in this projection, any Russian intercontinental ballistic missile fired from a submerged submarine located at the coordinates provided by the Russians would be visible at second stage burnout (~100 miles altitude) over a HUGE surface area underneath its trajectory (the yellowish circle) ... which would have then shifted ... northeast ... following the intended flight path toward Kamchatka ... an instaneous viewing area spanning over 1000 miles in radius!
This simple geometric reality can be confirmed by anyone equipped with a small calculator and a basic knowledge of the openly published Bulava flight parameters.
Or, if you're too lazy for that ... simply refer to this handy graphic (below) on Wikipedia:


And, for those who have trouble believing that a rocket launch several hundred miles away could be seen at all, here's an actual photograph (below) -- taken of a White Sand's "pre-dawn, solid-rocket missile test" ... from over 300 miles!


And here's another (below) -- a post-sunset launch from Vandenberg AFB, seen from San Diego, CA (about 250 miles away). The rocket here is a Boeing Delta 4 (with 4 strap-on solids for extra thrust, that burn for the first 78 seconds before dropping away).
Note how the contrail is initially dark (below the shadowed clouds), before the upwardly accelerating rocket bursts into sunlight ... still shining several thousand feet above the darkened launch pad ... and the contrail suddenly turns bright.
Note further how narrow the contrail appears, compared to the visible width of the crescent Moon (approximate 0.5 degrees across); a little trig, and one can easily calculate the contrail's own physical width ... even though it's also ~250 miles away.
The key, of course, is having that critical angular comparison ... and knowing the distance and direction to the launch -- three key parameters missing in all the early Norwegian reports ....


A closer comparison of the same launch (below) ....


After a few minutes, this initially thin contrail expands ... twisting itself into exotic and highly colorful geometries (caused by light-refracting ice crystals at high altitude - below) -- as it is also blown around by strong upper atmospheric winds.


One of the first solid (sorry ...) scientific confirmations that the "missile theory" for Norway might, in fact, be correct ... is contained in the series of published Norway images taken after the Spiral itself had disappeared--
Leaving only a strange "blue mist" hanging in the sky ... "aimed" at a brilliant white, twisted linear formation ... hovering just over the pre-dawn Norwegian horizon--

Looking exactly like the expected contrail of a solid-fueled rocket launch (closer view, circled - below)!


Here's a striking ultra-close-up (below) ....


Sure looks like the aftermath of a missile launch ....
The next test of "the missile theory" would be to determine the actual azimuth of this tell-tale contrail ... and compare that against the known azimuth of the White Sea launch site (according to the Russians) as seen from northern Norway, for the Wednesday "Bulava problem" ....
After countless hours of searching the Internet, finally ... a breakthrough--
An anonymous poster on one of the (many) Internet chat rooms that erupted after the Spiral's appearance -- someone actually doing some real science -- had managed to track down the geographical location of perhaps the most spectacular published image of this early morning apparition (below)--


Using Google Earth, this anonymous individual had then gone on to locate several daytime, matching surface shots of the unique "sawtooth range" seen prominently directly under the Spiral in the photograph ... obviously, taken from very near the Spiral photographer's location (below).


And, a Sawtooth Range close-up:


When composited together (below), the evidence was compelling:


This spectacular, time-lapse "Norway Spiral" image was NOT (as the original press reports led everyone to believe ...) taken from Tromso. Instead, the widely-circulated "Spiral Photograph" had actually, it turns out, been photographed from a location even farther north ... from a tiny fishing camp called "Skjervoy" -- located about 55 miles ("as the crow flies ...") northeast of Tromso (below).


Armed with this vital additional information, it was then a simple matter to go to back Google Maps, and plot the precise azimuth to the top of this suspicious contrail -- peaking over the "sawtooth range" of mountains seen across the fiord ... to Skjervoy's southeast (below).


The next step was to compare this result -- which read "about 21.5 degrees south of east ..."-- with the azimuth direction (~23 degrees ...) of the Russian's claimed launch-site for the Bulava ... "in the southern end of the White Sea, near Arkhangel" (below) ....


Allowing for the fact that the photographer was watching the Spiral over the top of the spectacular and jagged "sawtooth range" -- about 6 miles away from his camera -- and thus physically couldn't see the base of the inclined 1st-stage contrail on the horizon ... the ~1.5 degree northerly "error" from the actual pre-announced Russian submarine location is perfectly within the inclined ("depressed trajectory" is the technical term for the) geometry of a previous Bulava undersea launch (below)!


Here, from another anonymous post, is a 3-D recreation of this approximate launch geometry as seen from orbit (below):

--

While not super accurate, the general geometry is "close enough for folk music"; if his launch point is moved closer to Arkhangel (as the Russian pre-launch warnings indicated ...), the launch trajectory would also take it further east -- over the isthmus ... moving it even farther away from Skjervoy.
Which is where the observed altitude comes in ....


Because of the known geometry to those unmistakable mountains SE of Skjervoy, we can now measure all the critical angular and scale parameters in the Skjervoy Spiral image -- discovering that the 0.5-degree center of the Spiral (yes, it was about as big as a Full Moon, as witnesses also reported ...) hung almost 6 degrees above the mountains ... and was therefore about 12 degrees above the true horizon.
Which meant -- if the Bulava launch trajectory was ~600 miles east of Skjervoy -- and the Spiral was (somehow ...) caused by the malfunctioning third-stage of the rocket, the Spiral would have been about ~125 miles above the Earth when visible in that striking image taken from Skjervoy.
Again -- all totally consistent with the Russian's pre-launch announcement ....
Against all this mounting evidence, however -- that it was, indeed, the Russian missile that had caused the Spiral -- was one really major flat-out contradiction:
Repeated eyewitnesses testimony that "the moving light came up over the mountain ... and then came to a dead stop ... as it began to spin out this astonishing blue-white spiral ...."
How can a "rising rocket," coasting upward on its enormous momentum (imparted by the burning of literally tons of incredibly explosive fuel)--
Suddenly ... just come to a dead stop!
Answer: it couldn't.
If that behavior, indeed, happened ... it alone would automatically rule out anything as mundane as "a failing Russian rocket."

* * *

To test this "impossibility," Enterprise had to locate at least one good video from Norway (preferably more ...); by measuring the spiral's drift -- frame to frame -- across the sky on this video, we could determine geometrically if the eyewitness reports were true ....
That ... it didn't move.
We finally located the right video -- shot by a young Norwegian military serviceman, Christopher Rakoczy, posted to one of Norway's premiere military bases, at Skjold, Troms -- which, when analyzed frame by frame, revealed the unmistakeable motion of the Spiral across Norway's pre-dawn northern skies--
In complete contradiction to the witnesses!
Here (below) are two sequential frames -- grabbed a few seconds apart--



Notice the motion of the stovepipe exhaust between frames (image left - above); the motion of the center of the Spiral is also very obvious (image - center)--
Totally undercutting -- in a stroke -- the misimpressions of multiple eyewitnesses ... with regards to the most siginificant detail of this entire amazing apparition ....
That "it stood still."
Here (below) is the overlay composite of these two revealing frames.



This elemental video frame comparison -- by unquestionably establishing that the Spiral continued to move slowly across the sky ... even as it rotated -- adds serious additional weight to the idea that, indeed--
The Spiral had been created by the out-of-control Bulava rocket ....

* * *

Case closed, right?
Of course not.
While we at Enterprise have independently proven to our satisfication that the Russians did, indeed, launch a missile from the White Sea that Wednesday morning ... and, that the tell-tale signs of that event were unquestionable captured on both Norwegian images and videos of the Spiral and its aftermath--
What we have not established by this analysis is any physical evidence that the Bulava was, in fact, directly involved in the generation of the Spiral.
The only case that we ... that anyone ... is capable of making at this point -- based only on analysis of the trajectory of the Bulava -- is completely--
Circumstantial.
While the Russians, stubbornly -- despite all their [inevitable] test telemetry -- for some reason ... continue to refuse to officially link the failed Bulava with the appearance of the Spiral ....
Could they know something we should know ...?
Like--
This--


Which, again, appeared the same night as the Spiral ... but over downtown Moscow--
Stay tuned ....



-0-




A "Nobel Torsion Message" Over Norway? Part III Updated!

http://www.enterprisemission.com/Norway-Message3.htm          Have to go to site for FULL PAGE !

A "Nobel Torsion Message" Over Norway?
Part III
Updated!

By Richard C. Hoagland
© 2010 The Enterprise Mission


In the extended pre-dawn darkeness over Norway last December, as we have recounted in Parts I and II of this Report ... "something" truly amazing happened--
And reaction immediately divided into two totally opposing views:
Those who "bought" the official media story ... that "it was only another failed Russian missile test ..."--
And then ... those who thought "it just might be something else this time ...."
As we have shown previously, there can be little doubt at this point that a Russian rocket was involved.
But--
The conclusion that everyone has jumped to -- with the striking exception of the Russians themselves -- that, somehow, the Russians caused The Spiral--
Well, that's a "leap too far" ....
We can now report, based on analysis of the extensive imaging evidence reported via the Norwegian press, that The Norway Spiral was NOT primarily caused by "a failed Russian missile test ...."
But--
The failed Russian rocket could, in fact, have been caused by whatever forces "created the Norway Spiral ...."
This section of our on-going analysis will describe precisely "how."

* * *

The scientific evidence behind this growing set of suspicions -- that the Spiral somehow caused the Russian missile to fail -- lies in the extraordinary geometric structure that Enterprise has discovered within the too-perfect, too-concentric "shell-like rings" ... making up the Spiral (below)--


A key part of this "impossible" geometry consisted of four, exactly 90-degree darkened "reticle-like" divisions of the Spiral ... precisely separating it into four radiating quadrants (above - right) ....
Geometric behavior simply inconceivable for any "randomly rotating ... fuel-spewing third-stage rocket ...."

* * *

This "too-too-regular-geometry ..." can only be explained by the presence of--
Some kind of energy-induced, standing-wave-pattern in the Spiral ....
Creating--
Narrow, uniform-width concentric striations ... ordered in an underlying medium (the leaking third-stage fuel?) by an external "forcing 3-D energy pattern"--
Then, it hit me:
"Chladni Figures!"


Chladni Figures (or the more modern term "Cymatic Patterns" - above) are two-dimensional geometric shapes, produced (in a laboratory setting) by acoustic vibration of "fine material spread on a thin substrate" (the violin bow "drawn across the edge of the metal plate with sand on it ..." - above left); the figures appear initially as highly-ordered, basic symmetry patterns ... starting with circular, concentric structures (below) ....



The shapes then ascend into a "virtual infinity of much more complex, higher-order geometric patterns ..." as the frequency of the sound is increased, and the "overtones" (created by the mixing of multiple frequencies) increase as well (below) ....


And--
"Chladni Figures" are not limited to sound ....
These fantastic, vibrational, geometric symmetries can ALSO be produced by electromagnetic excitation of "a standing-wave pattern in an electrified medium -- i.e. a plasma" ... like the Earth's ionosphere ... some ~50 miles up.
Or ... like a standing-wave pattern externally imposed upon a cloud of dispersed aerosols ... just like those that would be vented into space--
From "a spinning, failing rocket!"

* * *

In all the Norway Spiral images and eyewitness accounts, all the observers seem to have been universally awed by the Spiral itself ... yet, most completely ignored the blatantly visible "scattering envelope" (below) surrounding this precision geometric figure ... in which the Spiral geometry itself actually "appeared" ....


It is this obvious "surrounding medium" in which TWO "fluid spiral-wave patterns" were created--
The first:
By the simple hydrodynamic process of "a rapidly spinning, jetting fluid container ..." -- spraying its contents in an expanding circle ... into the hard vacuum existing above ~50 miles ....
Our "... leaking third-stage Russian missile 'bus!'"
Producing this amazing Norway image:


This face-on "spiral geometry" has, in fact (as the sceptics correctly insist ...), been seen before--
In the failures of other upper rocket stages, during some of their launches (below). Our first example (below - left) shows a 1989 Chinese missile fiasco "at altitude" -- that immediately created a dramatic "spinning pinwheel ...."


In the second example (above - right), the 2009 Norway Spiral itself appears in its "initial moments ..." -- looking, and acting, EXACTLY like its Chinese rocket counterpart from '89.
Reinforcing our analysis in Part II -- that, at this early phase in "the unfolding Norway phenomenon," the normal fluid disintegration of "a failing rocket" would create EXACTLY what was seen.
Until--
It abruptly turned to this (below)--


And, no, the dramatic difference is NOT caused by "differing photographic time-exposures" (as William C. Treurniet elegantly has comfirmed in his independent video analysis ... kindly called to my attention by Peter Gersten).
These two very different vibrational "modes," strikingly demonstrated in two comparison images (below) ... are due directly to "two distinct Spiral energy sources" ... arriving separately ... abruptly changing the original Archimedean spiral pattern of leaking fuel (below - left)--


To a stunningly resonant Chladni Pattern (above - right).
Again, this dramatic "transition mode" is actually visible in these "early" (above - left) and "late" ( above - right) Norway images, taken by different witnesses hundreds of miles apart ....
To be specific:
In the Spiral image on the left (above) -- taken within the first few rotations (count them ...) of its initial appearance -- the spiral pattern is "irregular ... of varying width ... and has a peculiar corkscrewing blue beam aimed airectly at its face-on Center ...."
However, in the image on the right (above and below) -- taken only a minute or so later -- the "blue spiral beam" has developed a remarkable, elongated, "two-forked trunnion" ... which begins precisely where the last "right-angle blue corkscrew segment" ends.
A close examination of this exotic "spiraling beam" (left - below) -- compared to the later image (below - right) -- reveals that the outer blue "corkskrews" (those well away from the core of the big, face-on Spiral ...), starting at this "trunnion," are "leaning" progressively further away from the Spiral's Center ... the farther away they are from that Center ....
An obvious result of "an expanding fluid cloud "... blowing outward ... past the material making up the "blue corkscrew," thus causing the increasing "tilt" of the more distant spiral corkscrew turns (below - right) ....


Until--
At the point where the first "blue vertical turn" and "trunnion" meet--
The underlying "Big Spiral Pattern" abruptly transforms (above - right)--
From, "a varying-width, fluid-like pattern ..."--
To--
"A precise, mathematically perfect--
'Chladni Figure Pattern' (negative image - below right) ...!"


* * *

Obviously, such a dramatic geometric change --- within a single fluid medium (the "hazy envelope" surrounding the entire spiral and its peculiar "rotating blue beam" ...) -- is only possible if some kind of "outside force" was suddenly being applied ... some external resonant energy ... to interfere with the original fluid-dynamics established internally, at the beginning of this sequence ....
In other words:
Some kind of "extremely advanced, electromagnetic (EM) technology"--
Such as HAARP!
Generating forces that could geometrically imprint (via the inevitable plasma-generated torsion fields ...) the electrified plasma/aerosol mixture that had been previously released at the edge of space ... flung out in all directions by the violently spinning, out-of-control Russian Bulava third-stage ....
Paul Murad, a mechanical and aeronautical engineer, and high-ranking Pentagon official under several past administrations in Washington, published an excellent popular review of Torsion Field Physics a few years ago, titled:
"Torsion Physics: A View from the Trenches."
In the course of this Review, Murad describes working with several Russian physicists who have been methodically seeking to turn the original, theoretical "Einstein-Cartan Torsion Tensor" into a workable, engineering technology for "torsion-field generation and manipulation ...." As part of this major engineering effort, at one key point Murad explicitly states:

" ... torsion [can be] right-handed or left-handed and is based upon a cylindrical field ... and can be created by large accumulations of electricity [plasma] and rotation of a body that if above a certain speed, would enhance the torsion field [below] ...."


And, the Norway Spiral was definitely rotating ... at a rate of about "one complete revolution per second!" And, undoubtedly, it was also highly "electrified" ... as a dense plasma "bubble" created at the electrified boundary between the upper atmosphere and space itself .....
Creation of highly-ordered, resonating "torsion fields" within that electrified plasma would have been inevitable, then ... even if such fields were not the original, primary objective of this vast "HAARP-like" event ....
A HAARP-induced torsion-field looking eerily like--
Our own Enterprise visualizations of much vaster torsion fields generated by the spinning Sun and orbiting planets ... across the entire solar system (below).


* * *

This, of course, is one of the scenarios we directly outlined in Part I -- that, somehow, the Norwegian HAARP facility near Tromso called EISCAT (European Incoherent SCATter Facility ...) was, indeed, "involved" in the creation of The Spiral ....
Now we had direct evidence from within the Spiral itself, strongly indicating that some kind of "external energy-field" had, indeed, been exerted on the Russian's "bus'" escaping fuel; that, this "field-imprinting" had then immediately created a radically different, concentric, highly-ordered radial pattern ... compared to the previous fluid spiral--
An obvious, "resonant EM standing-wave ... strongly interacting with the fuel/plasma being released from the runaway Russian rocket ... creating a striking Chladni geometric pattern."
But, is there any direct evidence -- from the Norwegian HAARP itself -- that it could have been, indeed, involved in the generation of The Spiral ...?
Yes.
A couple days after Part I was posted, I received an e-mail from David Wilcock; David had been working independently on his own extensive analysis of the Spiral (which eventually turned into an E-book -- which I have deliberately not read, so that our efforts and our conclusions are truly independent ...).
In the e-mail, David shared the fact that one of his "informants" had just located the daily "power-level logs" of the Tromso EISCAT facility (below).
Could I use the info?


Was he kidding?!
And, indeed, according to the published logs (above), the EISCAT facility was, indeed, radiating both VHF and UHF EM radiation ... THROUGHOUT this critical 7:45 AM Spiral "window" on December 9th ....
In fact, EISCAT was specifically scheduled to carry out a high-power ionosphere dual-frequency experiment ... at dawn ....
An experiment called, provocatively, "Tequila Sunrise."




In other words, with these upgrades the EISCAT facility -- in cooperation with other parts of "the northern Scandinavian HAARP antenna network" (below) -- could combine its beams ... and also project them (via their "phased array" technoloogy) considerably off-axis ... towards the horizon.


* * *

Which, of course, is exactly the direction from which the Norway Spiral initially appeared ... southeast of EISCAT, just over that pre-dawn horizon ... as viewed from the geometric center of this (now operational) "northern Scandinavian HAARP Interferometer (above) ...."
The same direction that our own analysis has strongly indicated an EISCAT experiment could, indeed, have caused such a spectacular phenomenon -- that another, totally independent geographic analysis has also now confirmed.
Tony Spell, a professional marine engineer, has carried out an exemplary study of the Spiral's origins ... flight path ... and ultimate disappearance -- seeking trigonometrically to learn exactly "where" the Spiral originated ... and where it was actually located as it evolved.
Spell's methodology (like ours in Part II) was to take Spiral images from known (or knowable) locations, orient the image with respect to recognizable surface landmarks in Google Maps (below), and then measure those now-known angular alignments with respect to key geometric features of The Spiral ....


From multiple sets of images, taken from multiple locations in northern Norway (below), Spell ultimately calculated his "best convergence estimate" of the Spiral's geographic location when it first appeared--
Over the eastern end of Russia's Kola Peninsula -- just north of the White Sea (below)--


Reassuringly, just about where our own initial analysis positioned it (below).


As a cross check, repeated, independent sets of "location measurements" have been carried out over the past several weeks by Enterprise Associate, Greg Ahrens (with the invaluable assistence of Mike Blackburn, who supplied some of the key images and crucial information direct from Norway); again, within the errors inherent in these images, Ahrens' alignments nicely converge on the same Spiral locations (plus or minus ...) as Spell's measurements (below).


When perspective is rotated ~90 degrees, and these "best-estimate" locations over the Peninsula are plotted against time--
Another "impossible" fact about this entire baffling phenomenon is resoundingly confirmed:
Eyewitness reports that--
"The Spiral stood still!"
At the height of the events -- between 06:45 UTC and 06:50 UTC (below) -- according to these combined, independent measurements, the Spiral only moved laterally north (right to left) by ~20 miles!--
Essentially motionless ... exactly as reported by the witnesses!



Which, of course, is impossible--
For "a simple, malfunctioning third-stage rocket ... supposedly traveling ~9,000 miles per hour" at that point in its projected flight!
Our most dramatic evidence yet that "something," indeed -- a bona fide torsion weapons technology -- somehow"reached out" and literally grabbed the Russian rocket test that morning ... brought it (in seconds!) to a virtual halt ... in mid-flight ... and then forced it to literally "turn cartwheels in the sky, as seen from northern Norway ...."
Similar sets of quantative image measurements were what allowed Spell -- again, independently -- to carefully calculate just "how large" various elements of the Spiral were, as this amazing phenomenon unfolded ....
In Spell's own words:

"... we now account for the effects of the Earth's curvature, which becomes very significant over these large distances of sight. Projecting the line-of-site values downrange over an imaginary flat 2D surface, as was described above, the altitudes are taken perpendicular to the Earth's surface resulting in values A through E of 79, 107, 146, 160, and 166 miles (127, 172, 235, 257, and 267 km). Note that the typical orbit for the Space Shuttles is generally in the range from 186 to 242 miles (300 to 390 km) above the Earth, with the top of the dissipating spiral and void clearly into this range. These results [below] combined with the 2D path [above], thus defines the 3D trajectory of the center of the spiral ...."



According to Spell's straightforward calculations, the Norway Spiral was somewhat less than 100 miles across ... when it first appeared (above). As it "died," it expanded rapidly to almost 400 miles across (above) ... the size of several major States!
Spell's own comparison is perhaps even more appropriatet:
" ... so in a sense this spiral can be likened to a hurricane ... projected vertically on its side [emphasis added] ...."
A vast, spiraling "hurricane" of--
Propagating torsion ....
On the official United States Naval Research Laboratory "HAARP site," computer simulations are presented for the electrical and magnetic interactions that HAARP's ionospheric heating pattern creates above Alaska -- in the electrified, ionospheric "plasma" above ~50 miles -- heating powered by the "megawatts of interfering RF beams" being radiated skyward from this type of HAARP antenna array (below)--


The result:
An expanding, spiraling pattern ... ultimately as big across as Alaska itself ... and, looking eerily like--
The Norway Spiral turned horizontal!


Which, if you examine it carefully (above - right) is also -- in direct contradiction to the widely-publicized "expert" opinion, that the Spiral was visible only because of pre-dawn sunlight -- in fact, this astonishing ~100-mile-wide apparition was obviously NOT being solely illuminated by the Sun!
The Spiral was also self-illuminated ... from the center outward (note the decreasing brightness ... and outwardly-facing shadows of successive "rings" ...): another confirmation of the high-energy "artificial optical emissions" created specifically by HAARP ... interacting with the escaping, sunlit fuel-turned-to-plasma from the disintegrating Russian missile ....

* * *

In a sense, then, BOTH "instant audience viewpoints" on this astonishing phenomenon -- that "it was only a Russian missile"; and that "it was a top-secret energy weapons test of HAARP" -- would seem to have been simultaneously correct!
It WAS the Russian missile, after all ...
But-
With some "extraordinary help" from the Scandinavian "High Altitude Auroral Reseach Project" ....
Once you know what to look for, the evidence that HAARP -- for some reason ... and somehow (more on this below ...) -- "took control" of this Russian missile-test that December 9th pre-dawn ... is everywhere--
Like ... in the divergence angles of the puzzling "blue corkscrew" that emmenated from the face-on Spiral's Center; as can be measured in this Spiral image (below), the angular-increase-with-distance of this blue "corkscrew" corresponds exactly with the famed "inverse square law" of standard 3-space EM radiation -- providing additional support that "some kind of beaming technology" was, indeed, being applied to the "leaking and rotating Bulava third-stage fuel residue"--
Thus -- creating the precise, resonant Chaldni Pattern seen in the final phases of this spectacular "Event" (below) ....


Further indications of this "outside force" comes from an abrupt, measureable change in the Spiral's flight trajectory ... exactly coincident with the "Chladni Pattern" being externally established (below)!


This direct measurement -- of "an abrupt ~11-degree-angle-course change" in the Spiral's path, once the HAARP RF excitation is "turned on" -- is confirmed by overlays of successive Spiral images (below)--


These simple measurements all confirm a dramatic, sudden application of external energy to the leaking fuel from the initial missile failure ... transforming it into the resonant, vividly geometric Chladni figure that suddenly spread out across the Norwegian skies ....
Strong evidence that HAARP, indeed, "took over" this Russian Bulava missile ... in mid-flight--
Via a torsion force -- created by the intense interaction of the HAARP EM radiation and the plasma gyrations created in the ionosphere as a direct result of that intense, beamed RF radiation--
Conditions ideal, as published in the open scientific literature, for creating highly-energetic, resonant torsion-field effects (below) ....


* * *

Further proof of this "applied external Torsion Force" is also blatantly evident in "how the Spiral died" (below) ....


With the sudden disappearance of its previous, amazingly coherent geometric spiral pattern -- at the precise moment--
It was abruptly replaced--
By what many astonished witnesses described as "... an expanding black hole" (above)!
Again--
All consistent with a scenario where "the third-stage Russian bus suddenly just ran out of leaking fuel" ... and the exterior "energizing field" -- the external HAARP beams creating the intense Chladni pattern seen resonating that diffuse fuel-cloud -- also, simultaneously, was killed--
Leaving only an expanding (and rapidly disappearing) "aerosol fuel ring ..." (below) -- looking just like a classic "black hole"--
Still speared by that "baffling blue corkscrew beam" ... hanging in the air.


Remarkably, as noted above, many of the conclusions reached in this Report have been independentally reached by other investigators, via several other routes; one investigation -- carried out by Dan Elder -- provides compelling independent evidence that the Spiral, indeed, was most likely "a direct consequence of HAARP."
Elder reprints portions of an e-mail he received from "a known Naval source," someone intimately familiar with the Alaskan HAARP Project -- both the visible site ... and another one, that's "hidden!"
The source observes--

"... when I saw those photographs and movies of the spiral in the sky over Norway I knew right away what it was. Especially when I saw the blue spiral going up towards the huge white one. We saw that when they 'tested' the heater [in Alaska] on the flats.
"You [sic] got to understand how this thing works. It's kind of a two stage thing. The first stage is where they send increasing power through the antennae farm which is really a phased array. The antennae are all sending out a powerful signal on the same frequency but they are all slightly at a different phase ...
"Anyway the next phase is when they send up the very low frequency transmission. This is the blue spiral. You can actually see the individual waves, or spirals, because it is what is called an "extremely low frequency" bandwidth. A complete cycle at this low a frequency can be miles long. That's what you see. It makes the atmosphere glow blue. You can see it at night [emphasis added] ...."


A post-script:
One of the many e-mails Enterprise has received over the last few weeks, in reaction to our early reporting on The Spiral, describes an amazing first-person account of something eerily similar, seen over the nighttime deserts of the Southwestern United States many years ago--

"... I have my own version of the Norway spiral missile story that took place 10-12 years ago, though what I saw was not a spiral but a square pyramid of light [see drawn illustration - below].
"I was in my mid- to late-teenage years driving with some friends to San Diego from Phoenix in the middle of the night over the desert. The night and the hour escape me as I write this, though I know it was in the year 2000. On the way to San Diego on interstate 8, I suddenly saw a blue/turquoise beam appear in the sky and a growing light start to emit from the head (not the tail). Rather than see a spiral, as depicted in many of the photos from the Norway incident on enterprisemission.com, this was a square 'pyramid' of light that slowly grew and grew until it was so large that it could no longer be seen. The square was divided by lines reaching from corner to corner, as though looking at a pyramid from the air straight above its peak.
"The odd thing was, even after the pyramid had grown/faded to the point of invisibility/indistinguishability, the blue beam remained in the sky and eventually faded away. I remember the whole incident taking about 30 minutes with the beam appearing first for a couple of minutes, the pyramid appearing and growing for another 15 or so, and then the beam fading away (it seemed to be affected by the wind, like images of missile con trails I've seen before) for the next 15 or 20 minutes. I don't know anything about the Norway "missile" or how long it lasted, but I can't describe to you how similar the images are to what I saw, with the exception of the spiral effect [emphasis added] ...."


The witness submitted his remarkable sketch of what he saw (below) ....


Which was--
Another obvious "Chladni Figure"--
Eerily mirroring NASA images of a dying star's powering of its own "Chladni torsion plasma geometry"--
5000 light years away.


* * *

At this point then, we have six main lines of evidence that the Norway Spiral was NOT -- contrary to the major efforts of the mainstream media to "sell" it--
"Just another Russian missile test ...."
That it was, in fact, that--
Plus -- "a LOT, LOT more" ....
Because of--

1) The startlingly artificial internal geometry that appeared, simultaneous with the obvious "Chladni-like standing-wave-pattern" the Spiral suddenly assumed ...
2) The sudden, confirmed (from two separate studies) "directional change" the Spiral's Center underwent ... just as this standing-wave-pattern "took physical control" ....
3) The fact that "something" -- measureably -- brought the Russian missile almost to a dead stop ... and then MADE it "spiral" ....
4) The instantaneous disappearance of this internal Spiral resonant geometry -- when, whatever external energy source was powering its striking vibrating interference pattern (being conveyed via whatever was also creating the "spiral blue beam ...?") ... was abruptly "killed."
5) Discovery that power-logs for EISCAT the morning of December 9, 2009 reflect an on-going, active experiment in progress ... covering the time when the Spiral first appears.
6) Discovery of a specific "pre-dawn HAARP experiment" -- previously scheduled for December 9th, termed ironically "Tequila Sunrise."



* * *

Was this, then, why the Russian Navy ... and then the Russian Defense Ministry itself ... initially denied there had "even been a missile launch"... only to then grudgingly admit "da, it was ours ...." [though, they still firmly (if curiously) deny that "the missile was responsible for the Spiral ..."]?
Was Premiere Putin, in fact, belatedly covering (after he looked at the telemetry ...) for what really happened with his carefully-timed "pre-Obama Peace Prize" missile test ... December 9th?
Like--
The embarrassing fact that "something" (or "someone" ...) took physical control of Russia's most advanced weapons system that fateful dawn ....
And then--
Turned it into an all-too-visible global humilation!?
Our own geometric measurements of the Spiral's "anomalously changing position" in several sets of images, had convinced us that "something" had, indeed, physically intervened in the Russian missile's previous trajectory ... resulting in a sharply-changing flight-path angle across the Norwegian skies (below).


Tony Spell's meticulous and completely independent analysis once again confirmed our own preliminary measurements--
By deriving trigonometrically the "moment-to-moment ground track" positions of the Spiral on a Google Maps vertical projection (below) -- from when it first appeared over the Kola Peninsula--
To when it died ... out over the Barents Sea.


Blatantly demonstrating that "something," indeed, not only physically almost stopped the Russian Bulava in mid-flight ... but had then physically MOVED the "generating center" of the Spiral ... over 50 miles east (from its previous Newtonian missile trajectory, northeast) ... something operating in a definitely "non-Newtonian" fashion!
As we asked in Part I, was someone also sending an unmistakable "message" to the Russian government that morning--
With a blatant demonstration of Hyperdimensional/Torsion Field Physics Technology ...?
And if so--
"Who" ... to "whom" ... and "why?"
And, most important--
Why now?

* * *

Analysis

OK, this is the part where we try to make technical and political sense of some very conflicting information ....
The political questions our preceding analysis of the Norway Spiral raises are non-trivial -- ranging from "why were Putin and Medvedev brandishing their most advanced strategic weapon on the literal eve of Obama's visit to Oslo for his Nobel Peace Prize ...?; to, "was the obvious (now) 'HAARP interaction' with the Russian missile" the result of just "bad timing" (the HAARP experiment "just happened" to coincide with the previously-scheduled Russian test?); or was the use of HAARP to (somehow ...) physically divert and take total control of the Russian Bulava--
Intentional.
And, if the latter, then--
Who was directly "taking on Russia" ... with such a blatant, public demonstration of a stunning "torsion-physics weapons technology?"--
While, at the same time, sending an equally pointed message directly to Obama -- again ... on the literal eve of his high-profile acceptance of a Nobel Prize, for--
World Peace!
What the hell REALLY happened over Norway, that pre-dawn, December 9th!?
This, of course, is where the second "December 9, 2009 Russian sky anomaly" comes in (with gratitude to another Enterprise Associate, Boris Yaroslavtsev, for locating crucial Russian analyses of this amazing appartition ...)--
The "impossible" Moscow Pyramid (below) ....


For, as you may remember from Part II, the same night all this was going down over Norway ... an astonishing video anonymously showed up on "RU" -- the Russian equivalent of YouTube--
December 9th ....