hehe Subscribe To
Posts
All Comments
Saturday, December 16, 2017
California Fires and Space-Based Weather Weapons ~hehe don't worry folks, IT'S all just some "C" nut shit "only" God can control the weather ... y don't u "un~believers" just READ a fucking patent 4 ONCE & geet yer fucking heads out~ta yer ...
APLAINTruth 12/10/17 exposes the local Agenda-21 cult who benefit in these fire disasters.
[Image: From a February 2006 patent application by Solaren, proposing that terrestrial weather systems might be controlled by mirrors in space].
[Images: From Solaren‘s February 2006 patent application].
Using a complicated geometry of spaceborne mirrors – seen in the diagrams below – in tandem with meteorological tracking technology, this device would give Solaren the ability to control the weather.
Or, as the patent application itself explains, it would be a “Space-based power system and method of altering weather using space-born energy”:
Power system elements are launched into orbit, and the free-floating power system elements are maintained in proper relative alignment, e.g., position, orientation, and shape, using a control system. Energy from the space-based power system is applied to a weather element, such as a hurricane, and alters the weather element to weaken or dissipate the weather element. The weather element can be altered by changing a temperature of a section of a weather element, such as the eye of a hurricane, changing airflows, or changing a path of the weather element.Weather control has become a topic of near-constant interest for me. As I suggested the other night in my talk at the SVA – and as I also explore in The BLDGBLOG Book – weather control could very well be the future of urban design; in other words, cities might very realistically attempt to engineer specialty microclimates – similar to Beijing‘s Olympic efforts at weather control last summer – as a new means of attracting new residents and future development.
What’s fascinating about Solaren’s proposal is that it seems entirely possibly that, for instance, Dubai, attempting to recapture the international imagination, might put into orbit a private, geostationary solar farm with which that city could not only power its delirious experiments in beach refrigeration and large-scale air-conditioning, but actually create a new climate for the city.
[Image: A geometry of mirrors in space, from Solaren‘s February 2006 patent application].
That, of course, or it’s just Real Genius all over again: after all, why use this technology only for stopping hurricanes when you could melt an opposing army’s tanks or even assassinate someone through a brief application of solar overload? We’ll just militarize Apollo, bringing astronomical power down upon our enemies, causing storms of fire in distant cities, evaporating reservoirs, and turning glaciers into roaring torrents of weaponized floodwaters.
[Image: From Solaren‘s February 2006 patent application].
In an endlessly fascinating article published two years ago in The Wilson Quarterly, historian James R. Fleming describes – among many other things – how a “weather race with the Russians” was fought on the level of climatological R&D between the U.S. and U.S.S.R. during the Cold War.
For instance, “In the 1940s,” Fleming writes, “General George C. Kenney, commander of the Strategic Air Command, declared, ‘The nation which first learns to plot the paths of air masses accurately and learns to control the time and place of precipitation will dominate the globe.’”
Indeed, the U.S. military ultimately hoped that it might learn how to “alter the global climate for strategic purposes,” something which not only involved “using weather as a weapon of warfare,” but “using controlled precipitation as a delivery system for biological and radiological agents.” You could snow anthrax, say, onto the streets of belligerent cities unaware of the infections drifting down from above.
But perhaps all they need is a strange new constellation of mirrors – a remote-controlled blur of light that moves against the stars it’s surrounded by – to hurl typhoons against China or destroy a whole civilization’s agricultural base from above.
Toward the end of his article, Fleming asks:
Assume, for just a moment, that climate control were technically possible. Who would be given the authority to manage it? Who would have the wisdom to dispense drought, severe winters, or the effects of storms to some so that the rest of the planet could prosper? At what cost, economically, aesthetically, and in our moral relationship to nature, would we manipulate the climate?Of course, having said all that, I don’t mean to imply that Solaren’s weather control system is some kind of paranoiac Doomsday Device; but anyone who learns to stop – or, more to the point, conjure up – hurricanes from space will nonetheless be sitting on an unimaginably powerful technology.
(Via Alexis Madrigal – who signed a contract for his first book yesterday. Congrats, Alexis!)
CALIFORNIA FIRES: SOME DISTURBING SPECULATIONS
First, let's get one thing cleared off the table: fires do
happen, and so to high pressure zones, and so does disaster. Not
everything is engineered. Not everything is a conspiracy. But I'd be
lying if I said that I don't have some suspicions about all these fires
in California, and my suspicions go into the red zone whenever I hear
an "envirocrat" like California governor Jerry Brown saying :get used to
it" (this article shared by Mr. B):
Yup,
that's right, Californians have to "get used" to the possibility that
these types of disasters will be "the new normal", and it's all because
of "climate change" (of course):
California Governor Jerry Brown has told the state’s residents to get used to destructive wildfires in winter, declaring them “the new normal”.As six major fires ravage southern California, having led to the death of one person and the destruction of hundreds of homes and other buildings, Mr Brown said the state needed to face up to a new challenge.Visiting Ventura County, where the largest of the blazes – the Thomas Fire – is still growing, Mr Brown said drought and climate change mean California faces a “new reality” where lives and property are continually threatened by fire, at a cost of billions of dollars.He said it will take “heroic” efforts in the US and abroad to stem climate change, and urged Congress to pay more attention to dealing with natural disasters such as fires, floods and earthquakes.
Of
course, blaming all this on the ever-so-helpful universalization of
"climate change" ignores the self-evident nature of the assertion, it's
niftily dispatching with other possible explanations: arson, terrorism,
and the ever-present possibility of weather manipulation technology,
which we'll get back to in a moment.
What
makes me suspicious about the whole fire mess are the numerous
anomalies encountered in the recent fires in northern California. Many
of these anomalies have - to my knowledge - not shown up (yet) in the
southern fires: homes burning to the ground, right next to shrubbery or
trees that don't burn at all is something I call anomalous; plants and
trees bent over in the signatures of powerful microwaves, I call
anomalous.
But then there's this, a video shared by Mr. G.F. (an no, that is not an invitation to send me more videos!): the first few minutes of this say it all:https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=T5wCm3PKeP4
Now,
again, high pressure systems can and do park themselves in places and
create strange weather patterns. But the problem is, we simply do not
know the cause of this. "Climate change" isn't an explanation here or
anywhere else; it's merely a wonderfully broad phrase that is so broad
it reduces to tautological non-explanation: the climate changes,
"weather happens"; its only utility is for seeming like it's an
explanation while agendas are being driven through it by the truckload.
Are such high pressure systems and their relative stability and
motionlessness over time driven by some geophysical cause, and thus, is
this a genuinely emergent stable pattern that we need to be concerned
about? Or is the source "out there", is it related to the
magnetosphere? are these resonance or "blowback" effects from the use of
CERN's collider? Are such effects caused by ionospheric heaters? (and
read Eastlund's patents for HAARP sometime, where precisely such weather
modification is proposed as one possible use of the technology).
My
point in raising such questions and possibilities is to place them in
the context of the anomalous things we saw in the northern California
fires, and to raise a speculative possibility: it's easy to talk about
"climate change" when one controls the technology to do it. And it's
much easier to drive down real estate prices, and to drive people from
their homes, and pick up assets on the cheap after a disaster such as
this, when one has the technology to start the fires, and then to
exacerbate the results by denying moisture to the situation by parking
high pressure zones over the western US.
In
other words, it's when the governor says, "get used to it, it's the new
normal" and then invokes the non-explanation of climate change, in
other words, that my suspicion meter goes into the red zone. It's when
these corrupt and cynical politicians ignore the very real case for the
existence of weather modification technologies and then tell us to "get
used to it" because it's just "climate change" that my blood boils. Why,
because they need to be demanding that the federal government come
clean on what technologies have been used, and who is using them. https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/12/california-fires-disturbing-speculations/
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)