Monday, June 10, 2013

U.S. Suffers Biggest Pay Drop On Record, As Workers Squeezed Tighter


U.S. Suffers Biggest Pay Drop On Record, As Workers Squeezed Tighter

Posted:   |  Updated: 06/05/2013 5:11 pm EDT
The economic "recovery" just keeps getting worse for the average worker: U.S. employers squeezed their employees even harder than usual in the first quarter, leading to the biggest drop in hourly pay on record.
Hourly pay for nonfarm workers fell at a 3.8 percent annualized rate in the first quarter, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported on Wednesday. This was the biggest quarterly decline since the BLS started keeping track in 1947. Some of the drop was payback for a 9.9 percent surge in hourly pay in the fourth quarter of 2012, as employers shoveled money out the door to avoid tax changes they expected to take place in 2013.
But there have been plenty of such quarterly pay increases in the past. Many were even bigger. Some went on for several quarters at a time. And never has there been such a steep pay drop in response as there was in the first quarter of this year.
Smoothing out the quarterly ups and downs doesn't make the picture look any better. Hourly worker pay rose just 1.9 percent in 2012, a pitiful increase that barely kept up with the 1.8 percent gain in the consumer price index. That was the third-weakest annual increase in hourly pay since 1947, topping only the 1.4 percent gain in 2009 and a 1.8-percent gain in 1994.
Hourly pay has grown by just 2 percent per year, on average, for the past four years, the weakest four-year stretch on record. At the same time, corporate profits are at record highs, and until a recent swoon, the stock market was setting records, too. Workers haven't been reaping the rewards, but their employers have been.
The economy hasn't been getting much out of the bargain lately, either. Worker productivity -- hour output per hour worked -- gained 0.5 percent in the first quarter, according to the BLS. That's weaker than the 0.7 percent gain in all of 2012 or the 0.6 percent gain in all of 2011. Productivity is down dramatically from average annual gains of 3 percent in 2009 and 2010.
Weaker productivity could be good news. Maybe employers have hit the limits of how much they can squeeze out of their workers, meaning they'll have to hire some more.
But it does not bode well for future growth. The U.S. had four straight years of meager productivity going into the Great Recession. Stagnant productivity can erode living standards and leave less money for the kind of research and development that leads to the jobs of the future.
Productivity has seemed decoupled from worker pay for awhile now -- even when the economy is productive, pay has been mostly stagnant, as most of the benefits flow to the very top of the income stack. So, hooray, yet another culprit in the death of the middle class.

U.N. Agenda 21 To Seize 17.8 Million Acres From Missouri and Arkansas, Please Help Stop This Land Grab

Sunday, June 9, 2013 17:11

Attached is is additional information explaining how the Blueway affect property owners.  Please review the information below and see that you make the information available to your County Judge.
We must unite as Americans and defeat this proposal.
Click here for a map of the affected area .  It encompasses over 17 MILLION acres!
nwomap99
Don’t let anyone tell you that this White River Watershed National Blueway isn’t a  Federal land grab. The whole purpose of this Blueway is to take over ALL land and Surface Water. You need be be familiar with Agenda 21 and the Wildland project to understand the goals are to rewild over 50% of the United States.
Here is some information on the Explanation of the Biodiversity Treaty and the Wildlands Project  http://www.proliberty.com/observer/20091223.htm
==========================================================================================
We are being asked by county judges how the White River National Blueway Designation would adversely affect property owners in the county.  Here is an example of our cover letter:
The Blueway is a very broad spectrum, all-encompassing program that will be very unkind to property owners and their unalienable rights that protect them.  It represents an end-run around Constitutional law. The Blueway will adversely affect both ranchers and farmers in the county, as well as the support base centered around those functions: businesses like the feed stores, the hardware stores, tack shops, farriers, real estate people, county fair functions, co-ops, farm equipment dealers and maintenance shops, large animal veterinarians, health care providers & hospitals, restaurants, fuel depots, schools, etc. etc.  If the farmers, ranchers and rural land owners cannot function freely, then the rural and small towns and hamlets in Arkansas and Missouri will ultimately dry up as an industry in this federally designated corridor called the Blueway.
The Blueway is presented as some warm and fuzzy program to protect the environment, when in fact it is an unlawful federal land grab with an end run game plan to drive you off of your land, so some obscure endangered species won’t be threatened by man’s progress.  Think of an Environmental Impact Study on steroids, and you have the Blueway. Progress won’t be just thwarted for several months or years; it will be halted altogether.  Several years back, the nation all watched in horror when the California Fish and Game Commission ruled in favor of the Long fin and Delta smelt (a two inch minnow) over the livelihoods of 60,000 workers and land owners in California’s San Joaquin Valley, considered by many to be the richest and most productive farmland in the nation. The environmentalists shut off the water pumps to farmers, prohibiting them from irrigating their fields.  Aside from the vast loss in food production to the world, the workers all went on unemployment overnight!  With an annual rainfall of 12 inches, the place looked like a dust bowl in a few short months.  Any farmer will tell us, once you uncover the land, and then don’t water it, nothing will grow there again.  Duh. The same mentality pushing the Blueways is the same mentality that shut that water off. Animal protection takes priority over humans.  Economic growth is the enemy to the Environmentalists and to their god, Mother Nature.  It is really a religion of sorts to these people.  The White River National Blueway will help to terminate economic activity in and around the 17.8 million acres shown on the map.  Running water and moving water becomes the yoke around the neck of those who live in this area.
                                                            —————————————————–
Click here for a map of the affected area .  It encompasses over 17 MILLION acres!
Click here for the map of counties .   Counties highlighted in yellow already have volunteers to bring the Resolution of Opposition to their county judge or J.P. to stop the Blueway designation.   Is your county covered?  If not, PLEASE help us!  We need you to volunteer to help in the counties that aren’t highlighted in yellow.  You may click on a county and enter your contact information.
We have over 40 counties covered, and we need 50 by the end of the week.  We’ll need you to take the Resolution of Opposition to your County Judge or JP.    Click here for the Resolution .
We’ll send you all the other information that you’ll need after you sign up.
Please contact our Chairperson, Jeannie Burlsworth, with any questions:
jburlsworth77@gmail.com
501-821-6100 or 501-250-6474
Securing the blessings of liberty,
Secure Arkansas
Arkansas.SecureTheRepublic.com
Information@SecureArkansas.com
Please forward our emails to your friends and family.  They may also sign up to receive our Action Alerts here .
Please consider making a donation to support us.  Go to Arkansas.SecureTheRepublic.com and scroll down to the orange PayPal Donate button at the bottom right-hand side.
Critical Reads: More News Mainstream Media Chooses To Ignore By Josey Wales, Click Here!

Super Secrets! NSA, the secret AT&T spy room, 2 Israeli companies, and loss of American privacy

Sunday, June 9, 2013 7:59

Posted with Permission  :)

NSA, the secret AT&T spy room, 2 Israeli companies,
and loss of American privacy
 
by Jon Rappoport
June 9, 2013
  
Boom. Explosive revelations. The NSA is using telecom giants to spy on anybody and everybody, in a program called PRISM.
But the information is not new.
Three books have been written about the super-secret NSA, and James Bamford has written them all .
  
In 2008, Amy Goodman of Democracy Now interviewed Bamford as his latest book, The Shadow Factory, was being released.
Bamford explained that, in the 1990s, everything changed for NSA. Previously, they’d been able to intercept electronic communications by using big dishes to capture what was coming down to Earth from telecom satellites.
But with the shift to fiber-optic cables, NSA was shut out. So they devised new methods.
  
For example, they set up a secret spy room at an AT&T office in San Francisco. NSA installed new equipment that enabled them to tap into the fiber-optic cables and suck up all traffic.
How Bamford describes this, in 2008, tells you exactly where the PRISM program came from:
  
NSA began making these agreements with AT&T and other companies, and that in order to get access to the actual cables, they had to build these secret rooms in these buildings.
  
So what would happen would be the communications on the cables would come into the building, and then the cable would go to this thing called a splitter box, which was a box that had something that was similar to a prism, a glass prism.
  
And the prism was shaped like a prism, and the light signals would come in, and they’d be split by the prism. And one copy of the light signal would go off to where it was supposed to be going in the telecom system, and the other half, this new cloned copy of the cables, would actually go one floor below to NSA’s secret room.
  
… And in the secret room was equipment by a private company called Narus, the very small company hardly anybody has ever heard of that created the hardware and the software to analyze these cables and then pick out the targets NSA is looking for and then forward the targeted communications onto NSA headquarters.”
  
In James Bamford’s 2008 interview, he mentions two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, that almost nobody knew about. They played a key role in developing and selling the technology that allowed NSA to deploy its PRISM spying program:
  
Bamford: “Yeah. There’s two major – or not major, they’re small companies, but they service the two major telecom companies. This company, Narus, which was founded in Israel and has large Israel connections, does the – basically the tapping of the communications on AT&T. And Verizon chose another company, ironically also founded in Israel and largely controlled by and developed by people in Israel called Verint.
  
So these two companies specialize in what’s known as mass surveillance. Their literature – I read this literature from Verint, for example – is supposed to only go to intelligence agencies and so forth, and it says, ‘We specialize in mass surveillance,’ and that’s what they do.
  
They put [this] mass surveillance equipment in these facilities. So you have AT&T, for example, that, you know, considers it’s their job to get messages from one person to another, not tapping into messages, and you get the NSA that says, we want, you know, copies of all this. So that’s where these [two Israeli] companies come in. These companies act as the intermediary basically between the telecom companies and the NSA.”
  
AMY GOODMAN: “Now, Jim Bamford, take this a step further, because you say the founder and former CEO of one of these companies [Verint] is now a fugitive from the United States somewhere in Africa?”
  
JAMES BAMFORD: “…the company that Verizon uses, Verint, the founder of the company, the former head of the company, is now a fugitive in – hiding out in Africa in the country of Namibia, because he’s wanted on a number of felony warrants for fraud and other charges. And then, two other top executives of the company, the general counsel and another top official of the parent company, have also pled guilty to these charges.
  
So, you know, you’ve got companies – these [two] companies have foreign connections with potential ties to foreign intelligence agencies, and you have problems of credibility, problems of honesty and all that. And these companies – through these two companies pass probably 80 percent or more of all US communications at one point or another.
  
And it’s even – gets even worse in the fact that these companies also supply their equipment all around the world to other countries, to countries that don’t have a lot of respect for individual rights — Vietnam, China, Libya, other countries like that. And so, these countries use this equipment to filter out dissident communications and people trying to protest the government. It gives them the ability to eavesdrop on communications and monitor dissident email communications. And as a result of that, people are put in jail, and so forth…”
  
AMY GOODMAN: “And despite all of this…these telecom companies still have access to the most private communications of people all over America and actually, it ends up, around the world. And at the beginning of the summer [2008], the Democrats and Republicans joined together in granting retroactive immunity to these companies for spying on American citizens.”
  
The fugitive CEO of Verint, whom Bamford mentions, is Jacob “Kobi” Alexander. In 2006, the US Dept. of Justice charged him with conspiring to commit securities and wire and mail fraud. The SEC weighed in and filed similar civil charges.
  
Alexander fled to Namibia, where he finally settled with the SEC for $46 million. The DOJ criminal complaint, as far as I can tell, still stands. Alexander continues to fight against extradition to the US.
  
He is no longer the CEO of Verint.
  
It’s obvious that these two Israeli companies, Narus and Verint, working for NSA, have been able to divert duplicate mega-tons of data to Israeli intelligence.
  
The recent media stories on this NSA PRISM spying system indicate that NSA is tapping into the servers of huge tech companies; Google, AOL, Microsoft, Skype, Apple, Yahoo. The methods of data theft may have expanded, but the result and intent remain the same.
  
The government-corporate juggernaut moves ahead. Their rationale—catching terrorists—is, in great part, a cover story to obscure the fact that the State wants control over the lives of all citizens, as it ratchets up the very conditions that provoke rebellion.
  
It’s a classic pincer movement.
  
As far as the current NSA PRISM spying is concerned, look for limited hangouts. These are partial admissions and excuses, offered to conceal greater crimes and stop investigations.
  
The giant tech companies already have their limited hangout in place: “We didn’t know it was happening, we would never have allowed it to happen, and we’ll be much more careful in the future.”
  
Obama is saying: Yes, let’s have dialogue on this matter…there’s a fine line between national security needs and overweening intrusion into citizens’ privacy.
  
The NSA is saying: We do spy, but we don’t read content of emails and phone calls. We just keep ‘records’ of the communications.
  
The lies lying liars tell. The NSA has multiple and redundant methods of spying. If they have to cut back, for a while, on directly accessing the servers of the giant tech firms, they can do it without losing a step.
  
After all, as James Bamford revealed five years ago, NSA cuts directly into fiber-optic cables and splits the data into two copies, one of which it keeps for itself. They can access Google and Yahoo in other ways.
  
Most easily, they can say to these willing tech partners, “Give us all your data.” And it will be done.
  
Firms like Google are already spying on their customers, putting together extensive profiles to craft better targeted ads. Google knows spying. Doing it for commercial purposes, or for “national security” purposes? They don’t make those distinctions.
Jon Rappoport
The author of two explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED and EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com

Paul McGuire -- Tin Foil Hat Media, Big Brother, And the Myth of Conspiracy "Theory"

Paul McGuire -- Tin Foil Hat Media, Big Brother, And the Myth of Conspiracy "Theory"

Govt wants all cars to track driver behavior, seatbelt usage and more

Govt wants all cars to track driver behavior, seatbelt usage and more

China destroys multiple shipments of GM corn from US

naturalnews.com

Originally published June 10 2013china

China destroys multiple shipments of GM corn from US

by Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

(NaturalNews) Several large shipments of genetically-modified (GM) corn and corn seeds originating from the U.S. have been destroyed by the Chinese government after being discovered by import officials at numerous locations across the country. At least three shipments of GM corn detected at the Wanzai Port in Zhuhai City near Macau were reportedly destroyed after being successfully intercepted by government officials, while another 21 cartons of GM corn seeds weighing more than 250 pounds were destroyed in the northern Chinese city of Harbin.

According to Chinese law, any import containing GMOs must be accompanied by the appropriate environmental and food safety tests conducted by Chinese institutions, not the biotechnology industry. This data is first submitted to the Chinese Ministry of Agriculture for review, and next passed on to the National Biosafety Committee for further review. If said data is eventually deemed adequate and meets strict guidelines, the corresponding shipment will be issued an appropriate safety certificate verifying its integrity and permitting its import.

But none of this was done for any of the GM corn, which had been shipped directly into China by an unnamed U.S. biotechnology company (the name of which you can probably guess). This company apparently tried to bypass Chinese law and sneak its toxic crops and seeds into the country without proper government oversight, which is technically an international human rights violation, knowing that these genetic poisons would likely be rejected if they had to go through the normal import process for GMOs.

"The deeply pro-GMO old government would not have made such a thing public," said a local Chinese citizen about the new Chinese government's swift action in dealing with the offending imports. "It would have secretly returned the shipments, or in most cases it would not even have inspected shipments that could contain GM ingredients."

You can read the entire legal framework for GMO imports into China here:
http://www.daff.gov.au

China now surpassing US in protecting food supply against genetic contamination

You know the integrity of the American food supply has reached an all-time low when even China is rejecting its offerings. The rest of the world has basically had enough of all this genetic vandalism of food, and yet America continues to take first place in agricultural stupidity, propagating deadly genetic poisons as is they were food - food that virtually nobody else on the planet is willing to eat anymore besides Americans, by the way.

America had better shape up now and begin ending the reign of GMO tyranny within its own borders, or else it will continue to remain the agricultural black sheep, and the embarrassment of the developed world. GMOs are not safe, they are not beneficial, and their only purpose economically is to fill the coffers of those running the industrial agribusiness scam. Worse, GMOs are poisoning humanity on a monumental scale, to the point where future generations may not even be able to have children due to GMO-induced sterility.

"[T]he new government's decisive move to destroy the illegal GMOs is 'progressive, encouraging, and satisfying'," adds GMWatch.org, quoting the words of an insider the site has dubbed Mr. Li. "He regards it as a sign that [the Chinese government] is keeping its promise to work for the people and the nation."

Sources for this article include:

http://gmwatch.org

http://www.daff.gov.au




All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml

Exclusive: U.S. finds long-lost diary of top Nazi leader, Hitler aide

http://news.yahoo.com/exclusive-u-finds-long-lost-diary-top-nazi-220221514.html
By John Shiffman
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The government has recovered 400 pages from the long-lost diary of Alfred Rosenberg, a confidant of Adolf Hitler who played a central role in the extermination of millions of Jews and others during World War Two.
A preliminary U.S. government assessment reviewed by Reuters asserts the diary could offer new insight into meetings Rosenberg had with Hitler and other top Nazi leaders, including Heinrich Himmler and Herman Goering. It also includes details about the German occupation of the Soviet Union, including plans for mass killings of Jews and other Eastern Europeans.
"The documentation is of considerable importance for the study of the Nazi era, including the history of the Holocaust," according to the assessment, prepared by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington. "A cursory content analysis indicates that the material sheds new light on a number of important issues relating to the Third Reich's policy. The diary will be an important source of information to historians that compliments, and in part contradicts, already known documentation."
How the writings of Rosenberg, a Nazi Reich minister who was convicted at Nuremberg and hanged in 1946, might contradict what historians believe to be true is unclear. Further details about the diary's contents could not be learned, and a U.S. government official stressed that the museum's analysis remains preliminary.
But the diary does include details about tensions within the German high-command - in particular, the crisis caused by the flight of Rudolf Hess to Britain in 1941, and the looting of art throughout Europe, according to the preliminary analysis.
The recovery is expected to be announced this week at a news conference in Delaware held jointly by officials from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Justice and Holocaust museum.
The diary offers a loose collection of Rosenberg's recollections from spring 1936 to winter 1944, according to the museum's analysis. Most entries are written in Rosenberg's looping cursive, some on paper torn from a ledger book and others on the back of official Nazi stationary, the analysis said.
Rosenberg was an early and powerful Nazi ideologue, particularly on racial issues. He directed the Nazi party's foreign affairs department and edited the Nazi newspaper. Several of his memos to Hitler were cited as evidence during the post-war Nuremberg trials.
Rosenberg also directed the systematic Nazi looting of Jewish art, cultural and religious property throughout Europe. The Nazi unit created to seize such artifacts was called Task Force Reichsleiter Rosenberg.
He was convicted of crimes against humanity and was one of a dozen senior Nazi officials executed in October 1946. His diary, once held by Nuremberg prosecutors as evidence, vanished after the trial.
A Nuremberg prosecutor, Robert Kempner, was long suspected by U.S. officials of smuggling the diary back to the United States.
Born in Germany, Kempner had fled to America in the 1930s to escape the Nazis, only to return for post-war trials. He is credited with helping reveal the existence of the Wannsee Protocol, the 1942 conference during which Nazi officials met to coordinate the genocide against the Jews, which they termed "The Final Solution."
Kempner cited a few Rosenberg diary excerpts in his memoir, and in 1956 a German historian published entries from 1939 and 1940. But the bulk of the diary never surfaced.
When Kempner died in 1993 at age 93, legal disputes about his papers raged for nearly a decade between his children, his former secretary, a local debris removal contractor and the Holocaust museum. The children agreed to give their father's papers to the Holocaust museum, but when officials arrived to retrieve them from his home in 1999, they discovered that many thousands of pages were missing.
After the 1999 incident, the FBI opened a criminal investigation into the missing documents. No charges were filed in the case.
But the Holocaust museum has gone on to recover more than 150,000 documents, including a trove held by Kempner's former secretary, who by then had moved into the New York state home of an academic named Herbert Richardson.
The Rosenberg diary, however, remained missing.
Early this year, the Holocaust museum and an agent from Homeland Security Investigation tried to locate the missing diary pages. They tracked the diary to Richardson, who was living near Buffalo.
Richardson declined to comment. A government official said more details will be announced at the news conference.
(Reporting by John Shiffmann in Washington and Kristina R. Cooke in San Francisco; Editing by Blake Morrison and Leslie Gevirtz)

Obama Busted Again Professor Henry Graff : I taught at Columbia for 46 years Obama Could Not Have Gone There

Monday, June 10, 2013 11:21

Professor Henry Graff : “I taught at Columbia for 46 years” Obama Could Not Have Gone There

June 9, 2013 | Filed under: Government and tagged with: Barack Obama, Columbia, Columbia University, Diplomatic history, ghost, Graff, Henry, Obama, Professor, United States, Wayne Allyn Root
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Young-Obama-barack-obama-37291_216_332.jpg
By : Matt Winkeljohnhttp://www.resistthetyranny.com

There is no shortage of evidence that Barrack H. Obama is quite possibly the most inept, deceptive and disgraceful president that America has ever seen.

With all that we do know about Barrack Obama, what don’t we know?
We know that congress refuses to investigate Obama’s birth certificate.  Why would they.  It would prove that either there are higher forces that choose presidents for us or that congress is just as inept and crooked as Obama himself.
We know that Obama’s records of school and much of his past have been either permanently sealed or investigators have been repeatedly denied access to them.
We also know that many people in Barrack Obama’s past have died.  Some of which has been in some very unusual and unexplainable ways.  These people, coincidentally, are also people that could have exposed truths about Obama.
Speaking of Barrack Hussein Obama… We also know that he lived a double life under the name Barry Soetoro.”

As If all of that wasn’t enough, incredibly, there is more!

Let me introduce you to Wayne Allyn Root.
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/userphoto/13706315.571692.jpg
Mr. Root is a Capitalist Evangelist, entrepreneur, and Libertarian-conservative Republican.  He is also A graduate of Columbia University.  He also graduated the same year as Obama and from the same classes as Obama, but Mr. Root doesn’t remember Barrack Obama.  In fact, neither does anyone else in those classes.
Root is not alone in coming out about Obama’s mysterious absence from Columbia.
There are a number of professors that taught at the prestigious university that say they have no recollection of having Obama in any of their classes either.  Of those professors, there is one that agreed to a full interview.
Meet Professor Henry Graff
http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Snapz-Pro-XScreenSnapz019.jpg
Mr. Graff is perhaps the most legendary and honored professor ever at Columbia University. He was THE American History and Diplomatic History professor at Columbia for 46 years.
Of everything that Mr. Graff said in his interview, he ended by saying this -
“I’m very upset by the whole story. I am angry when I hear Obama called ‘the first President of the United States from Columbia University.’ I don’t consider him a Columbia student. I have no idea what he did on the Columbia campus. No one knows him.”
You would think that at a largely liberal collage, such as Columbia, former students and professors would be clamoring to say they have studied with Obama, produce pictures of them together or even claim to have shared a beer or two with the now president, but no, nothing.

Does all of this not concern you?  Shouldn’t the main stream media be telling you about this?
More importantly…
Shouldn’t YOU be “up in arms” over this?
i got this video from
http://www.youtube.com/user/personalliberty?feature=watch

http://Barack Obama: The Ghost Of Columbia University: ROOT For America: http://youtu.be/gWwGvvFeCPs via @youtube

China to revive ‘Southern Silk Road’

Source: China Daily
KUNMING – China is looking to revive the ancient “Southern Silk Road” linking its southwestern regions with Southeast and South Asia, as it aims to boost cooperation with countries along the once-booming trade route.
China has had trade, religious and cultural exchanges with South Asian countries by way of the “Southern Silk Road” since ancient times, Dilip Barua, Minister for Industries of Bangladesh, said at the ongoing 8th China-South Asia Business Forum in Kunming, capital of southwest China’s Yunnan province.
With a history of more than 2,000 years, the ancient trade route, stretching over 2,000 kilometers long, was dubbed the “Southern Silk Road” by historians.
The route, originating from Chengdu, capital city of Sichuan province, wandered through cities in Sichuan and finally took traders to Myanmar by way of Yunnan province. Then, it extended through to India, Bangladesh and even the Middle East.
Similar to the prestigious Silk Road, the “Southern Silk Road” contributed much to cultural exchanges between China and South Asian countries.
As a country located at the junction connecting China, South Asian and Southeast Asian countries, Bangladesh is eager to strengthen cooperation in various fields with neighboring nations, especially China, Barua said.
As traders from South Asia started to eye the vast Chinese market, economic and trade relations between China and South Asian countries grew. Bilateral trade volume increased from $34.7 billion in 2006 to $93 billion in 2012, according to Li Jiheng, governor of Yunnan province at the forum.
China has become an important trade partner and foreign investment source of South Asian countries while these nations are serving as China’s major overseas project contracting markets and investment destinations, Li said.
Yunnan Province, which positions itself as the “bridgehead” on the opening up of southwest China, has seen its trade volume with South Asian countries grow 18 times over the past 15 years.
However, since a convenient inland passage is still unaccessible, most business activities between China and these countries have to choose the risky sea passage, detouring through the South China Sea, and then by way of the narrow and perilous Strait of Malacca, to reach the South Asian region. The mountain valley communities of Yunnan Province and its backward transport infrastructures have hampered development of the remote southwestern border province.
Yunnan has endeavored to revive the once-booming trade road and become a significant transport hub since 1999 when the province started to plan  a transport system with the capital city of Kunming as the center, linking East Asia, Southeast Asia and South Asia, said Wang Xiliang, director of the Yunnan Development and Reform Commission.
During Chinese Premier Li Keqiang‘s visit to India in May, China and India called for establishing an economic corridor among China, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh in order to link East and South Asia, two crucial global economic growth points that would provide fresh impetus to Asian economic integration and economic expansion.
Li Jiheng believed the move will boost pragmatic cooperation between China and South Asian countries.
The proposal was also welcomed and echoed by South Asian countries at the ongoing first China-South Asia Expo, which is held in Kunming City from June 6 to 10.
T. M. Murtozaa Reza Chowhury, additional secretary of the Ministry of Commerce of Bangladesh said at the China-South Asia Business Forum that China and South Asian countries are neighbors with glorious history, splendid culture and long-standing relationships established 2,500 years ago thanks to the ancient “Southern Silk Road.”
Bangladesh always underscores the need for cooperation as an effective tool for social and economic development of the countries of the region, he said.
Rafeeque Ahmed, president of the Federation of Indian Export Organizations, said at the forum that Indian companies have developed great interest in Chinese and South Asian markets while calling for a convenient transport passage.
South Asian countries have expanded cooperation with China in various sectors, which is conducive to eliminating economic disparities and enhancing regional stability, said Rajitha Senaratne, Minister of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources Development of Sri Lanka at the third China South Asia Friendship Organizations’ Forum, which was held during the expo.
In fact, China is ready for the revival of the “Southern Silk Road” and plans are under discussion, according to Yang Ye, a researcher with the Development Research Center of Yunnan provincial government.
Besides the 16 existing international transport lines linking Yunnan and some Great Mekong Sub-regional countries, seven trunk roads originating from Yunnan extending to neighboring nations and provinces have been promoted as high-grade highways, according to sources with the Transport Department of Yunnan Province. These include China-Vietnam Highway, China-Laos-Thailand Highway, China-Myanmar Highway, and a domestic section of China-India Highway.
With joint efforts by China, India, Myanmar and Bangladesh, a highway route starting from Yunnan to India by way of Myanmar have been approved by relevant departments of the four countries, Yang said.
Experts from the four countries launched a field inspection along the route in February 2012. The first auto race along the 2,800-km route was successfully held from late February to early March this year.
The racing auto team started from the Indian city of Calcutta, traveled through Bangladesh and Myanmar’s major city of Mandalay entering China via the port city of Ruili, Yunnan Province, and finally reached Kunming.
Though the route of the new “Southern Silk Road” has yet to be determined, the success of the race across the four countries indicated that it is possible to build a transport passage along the route, Yang said.
The new route will not only help promote mutual understanding and exchanges between China and South Asian countries but also deepen and expand economic and trade cooperation among these countries, according to Yang.
On the other hand, the route is expected to serve as an inland bridge linking South Asian countries and central, eastern coastal areas of China, so as to promote the development of western regions of the country and boost the common prosperity of the nations along the route.

China details Indian Ocean strategy and interests

Source: Hindu
‘Blue book’ laments Beijing has trailed behind New Delhi and Washington in securing its interests
China has, for the first time, attempted to spell out its strategy — and plans — to secure its interests in the Indian Ocean in its first “blue book” on the region, released here on Saturday.
The blue book makes a case for China to deepen its economic engagements with the Indian Ocean Region’s (IOR) littoral states, but stresses that Beijing’s interests will be driven by commercial — rather than military — objectives.
However, it warns that the Indian Ocean could end up “as an ocean of conflict and trouble” if countries like India, the U.S. and China failed to engage with each other more constructively as their interests begin to overlap.
In a frank assessment of China’s role in the IOR so far, the book laments that Beijing has trailed behind New Delhi and Washington in securing its interests. The 350-page book’s introduction says candidly that China “has no Indian Ocean strategy,” while India has put forward its own “Look East” policy and the U.S. has put in place its “pivot” or “rebalancing” in Asia.
China’s impact
The book calls for China to be more proactive in securing its economic interests in the region. “If [China] cannot have a positive impact on these regional powers and the Indian Ocean littoral states, the future situation will be even more severe, and will affect China’s development and peace negatively,” the book says.
“China’s diplomatic strategy in the past has been based on the traditional concept of moderation, and striven to maintain the status quo,” it argues. “With changes in the relations among countries in the Indian Ocean Region and in the international situation, China’s diplomacy should also change. A clear development strategy in the Indian Ocean Region for China is not only a sign of China’s self-confidence, and also a clear demonstration of China’s strategic interests in the Indian Ocean Region.”
Official Chinese think tanks release “blue books,” which are policy documents that put forward recommendations to the government, on a range of subjects every year. The authors of the book, published by the official Social Sciences Academic Press, say it does not represent the government’s official position. They describe it as an attempt by scholars here to bring more attention to a region which, they believe, has not received adequate focus from policymakers.
“Frank dialogue”
Ambassador Wu Jianmin, a consultant to the project who earlier served as China’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, indicated that the book was part of a larger attempt to initiate a much-needed “frank dialogue.”
“We are going through a very important phase in international relations, and the change that we are seeing is unprecedented,” he told The Hindu. “Change generates apprehension, suspicion, even fear. This is a reality that is facing us.”
“To those who say that India ‘looking east’ and China ‘looking west’ will have to lead to rivalry, we have a different perspective,” he said. “We look at the convergence that there is [in this process]. If we only focus on differences, the end result is more suspicions, rivalry and competition. But in India too, you need peace and development. This is the same for China, and for the region.”
“To my understanding,” he added, “the region is facing an unprecedented opportunity for development. My advice is if in India you have doubts about China, we must have a frank conversation, and talk to each other.”
Ambassador Wu and Wang Rong, general secretary of the Yunnan University of Finance and Economics (YUFE) which backed the project, made the point at Saturday’s launch that China’s foreign policy has remained too focused on the West, and needed a shift in perspective.
The book was launched only two days after China opened its first South Asia Exposition, a trade push led by Yunnan and backed by the central government.
The book includes chapters on India’s “Look East” policy, the expansion of India’s interest eastward in an interlinked “Indo-Pacific.” and lessons for China on “the decline of U.S. and U.K. hegemony” in the region.
It predicts that “no single regional power or world power, including the U.S., Russia, China, Australia, India, can control the Indian Ocean by itself in the future world,” leaving “a fragile balance of power” that will be reached after jostling among “big powers.”
While arguing that the region’s security “does not face a serious threat yet,” it warns that “with the escalating defence efforts of world and regional powers, the future of the Indian Ocean region may turn from cooperation and peace into an ‘ocean of conflict and trouble’.”
The book stresses that “the rise of China is not a threat” to the region, though it acknowledges that “Indian Ocean countries, including India, are worried about the rise of China.” It attributes this trend to “the ‘China threat theory’ proposed by Western countries and the illusory ‘string of pearls strategy’,” rather than seek to explain what many of China’s neighbours, from Japan to the Philippines and Vietnam, see as a new assertiveness from Beijing.

Deutsche Bank opens 200-tonne gold storage facility in Singapore

Source: MineWeb
In a bid to capture part of the surging demand globally for physical bullion, Deutsche Bank has launched its second-biggest gold storage vault in Singapore.
Deutsche Bank has launched its second-biggest gold-storage vault in Singapore that can hold up to 200 tonnes of the metal as it looks to capture surging global demand for physical bullion.
Gold prices are near a two-year low and down 17 percent in 2013, after 12 straight years of annual gains. A sell-off in April released years of pent up demand, especially in Asia, stretching regional supply and pushing spot premiums to records.
Singapore last year excluded gold traded for investment from sales tax, prompting interest in buying and storing bullion in the city-state.
“There is a growing interest to buy physical gold for investment purposes,” Mark Smallwood, head of wealth planning at Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management for the Asia-Pacific region, told Reuters in an interview.
Traditional storage facilities are in London, Zurich and New York. But Deutsche Bank has seen a need to diversify some of that storage, he said.
“The time is ripe for a facility in the region (Asia-Pacific) to pick up steam. We believe that Singapore is well positioned to develop as a complementary custody and trading platform to the traditional hubs,” Smallwood said.
Deutsche Bank’s facility is at the Singapore Freeport, a warehouse for items such as precious metals, art and wine located at the airport.
The vault in Singapore is Deutsche Bank’s second-biggest after London, Smallwood said. The bank, which also has vaults in Zurich and Hong Kong, is sub-leasing space from Malca-Amit, a provider of storage facilities for valuables.
JPMorgan opened a similar facility at the Singapore Freeport in 2010.
Deutsche Bank already has precious metals trading, financing and physical distribution operations in Singapore.

The Essence of DNA Identity

"A moral principle in genetic testing is that it should always be done with the consent of the individual.
No one wants someone snooping into his DNA."   Arthur L. Caplan
DNAdata2.jpg
The Essence of DNA Identity
Do you intrinsically possess individual privacy rights, based upon natural law authority, or are your civil liberties arbitrarily defined by the current whims of government? How you answer, this question speaks loudly about your understanding of the nature of your very being. Those who deem that natural law is a myth or a superstition are poised for voluntary surrender of their vital identity. The cataloging of individual essence is aberrant. Your deoxyribonucleic acid is the core element of personal uniqueness and human dignity. If your DNA is subject to government collection and storage, the right of personal privacy is destroyed.
The dramatic proliferation of coercive police powers has little correlation to an improvement in public safety. The precedent that convicted criminals lose constitutional rights has gone virtually unchallenged in a society enamored with obedience to state authority. The practice of the law and the judicial review that provides the arbitrary and capricious rulings that incessantly favors the expansion of a greater level of state control, consistently violates common law and inherent principles.
It seems that civil liberties are an underreported topic by most "so called" conservative venues. Alas, the folks on the left at Democracy Now undertake the task of covering the implications and debates the merits of greater police powers in an interview, Supreme Court OKs Unfettered DNA Collection.
"In a landmark decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled the police can collect DNA samples from people they arrest even before they are convicted of a crime. Supporters of the swabbing method call it "the fingerprinting of the 21st century" that will help nab criminals and break open unsolved cases. But privacy advocates say the ruling is vague because it does not define what constitutes a "serious crime," and could create an incentive for police to make more arrests. The Supreme Court’s 5-to-4 ruling will likely fuel an expansion of DNA swabbing nationwide."
Background on the legislation that mandates DNA mining is a very slippery slope. The DNA Identification Act of 1994 authorized the establishment of a national index of: (1) DNA identification records of persons convicted of crimes, (2) analyses of DNA samples recovered from crime scenes, and (3) analyses of DNA samples recovered from unidentified human remains. Justice for All Act of 2004 instituted material changes to the DNA Identification Act of 1994, including the:
creation of a new indicted persons index;
expansion of the offenses for which federal and military offender samples are collected;
enhancement of the criminal penalties for unauthorized use of NDIS;
authorization of one-time keyboard searches by all NDIS participants of samples not normally included in NDIS (except for voluntarily submitted elimination samples);
deletion of the separate requirement for semiannual external proficiency tests (although it retained the separate requirement for biannual external audits);
requirement for state and local forensic laboratories to be accredited by a nationally recognized program within 2 years of enactment (October 30, 2006); and
requirement for the FBI to report to Congress any plans to change the "core genetic markers" 180 days prior to that change taking effect.
The Supreme Court of the United States in their decision, MARYLAND v. KING, drastically extended the scope for DNA sampling based upon a conviction to the new benchmark, an arrest. In the Washington Post, Professor Brandon Garrett cited in the article, After the Supreme Court’s DNA decision, what is the future of criminal justice?
"Garrett also said that simply adding a DNA sample from everyone who is arrested might even make it harder for police to identify criminals, increasing the likelihood of false positives without adding any perpetrators to the system.
"A lot of innocent people will have their DNA in these databases," he said. "That dilutes the databases and weakens their power." He argued that since many criminals have prior convictions, taking samples only from convicts would be more efficient."
Making the case for privacy rights, David Gusella argues in the Boston Collage Law Review, No Cilia Left Behind: Analyzing the Privacy Rights in Routinely Shed DNA Found at Crime Scenes.
"The purpose of DNA databases is to prevent future crime and to combat recidivism by using the information to catch repeat offenders. The government’s purpose in maintaining DNA samples does not outweigh the privacy rights of individuals because maintaining these samples ostensibly serves no governmental purpose. Despite the fact that many courts have found that convicted felons have a reduced privacy interest due to their past crimes, this privacy interest is diminished, not non-existent. In addition, because innocent people may be included in this database, their right to privacy in their genetic information should outweigh the minimal governmental interest in having access to non-phenotypic information. As a result, states should adopt some sort of limits on the duration of retention of physical DNA samples."
DNA.jpg
Collecting DNA from defendants is not equivalent with inking fingerprints into a database. Courts, routinely rubber-stamp the broadening of government authority. The calculated assault on liberty is accelerated when the function of peacekeeping morphs into intimidating law enforcement.
The outrageous Supreme Court decision in MARYLAND v. KING violates "due process" and demolishes the principle of innocent until proven guilty. The risk is obvious as stated in the article, Stockpiling of innocents' DNA.
"The policy of indefinitely retaining the DNA of anyone arrested – but not necessarily convicted – has meant that hundreds of thousands of innocent people, including thousands of innocent children, have had their DNA permanently retained."
Are there limits to a national DNA database? If any citizen arrested is subjected to a non- consensual DNA swabs sample, does it end with just suspects? In an age of hyperbolic criminalization of disputed infractions, giving greater discretionary power to an all-pervasive police state is sheer lunacy.
In the disembodied spirit of "it takes a village to raise a child", the article Newborn DNA Registries Raise Privacy Concerns by Sarah McIntosh indicates a disturbing practice.
"A February report in the Texas Tribune revealed the Department of State Health Services was giving hundreds of infant blood spots to the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory (AFDIL). According to information obtained through open records requests, AFDIL was in the process of building a national mitochondrial DNA registry."
From the same piece Twila Brase, president of the Citizens' Council on Health Care, warns of the consequences of allowing involuntary DNA samples databases.
"Government ownership enables the state health department and future legislatures to use newborn DNA as they see fit," Brase said. "There is a potential for eugenic strategies, especially in this era of cost containment. Governments and legislatures could implement policies that use the genetic screening data to reduce the bearing of children with costly medical conditions, mandating the kind of decisions you’ve seen with Downs’ Syndrome children."
With the inception of DNA science, the practice of biological engineering has gone wild. Extracting a DNA exemplar at birth is much different from forcing an arrestee to give up a saliva sample. The entire foundation of Western Civilization, based upon the inborn natural human rights of personhood, is violated when state mandates claim their license over your singular essence.
Assembling a massive DNA database on untold millions of Americans is an existential threat to the sacredness of life itself. The government is not our jailer, but is supposed to be our servant. Caution and vigilance oversight of government abuses is a cardinal duty of every American. Reasonable people should never trust the state to be the gatekeeper of your biological building blocks.
Common sense concludes that ownership of your DNA cannot morally be transferred into a communal retrieval system. Big Brother wants to dispatch the Grim Reaper when defective or unacceptable genetic traits are deemed detrimental to the socially collectivist society.
The "PC" misinformation declares, "Eugenics is the applied science of the bio-social movement which advocates practices to improve the genetic composition of a population, usually a human population." The true reality is that government sponsored research projects are seeking ways of culling the herd. DNA collection is the route to dissention elimination. Purging the general population of political undesirables is a goal that most courts would eagerly uphold. As the police state intensifies, the selection process for isolating individuals that resist the tyranny will increase. If your DNA is in the possession of the illicit authorities, the effortless framing of targeted nuisances becomes a distinct probability. The ease of charging a rebel against the state as a terrorist comes out of a master database. Do you trust the government to obey constitutional precepts and restraints?
Unless the public develops a defiant attitude towards the inhuman incarceration culture, the DNA collection scheme will just inflate the population of embattled captives. The solution is to defend civil liberties at every opportunity. This is not a phony left-right canard. The kernel of universality rests upon the certainty that each individual is sacred. Your DNA is the quintessence of your person and no government can legitimately enforce the theft of your singularity.
People need to learn a greater respect for their own privacy and practice its defense accordingly.
SARTRE – June 9, 2013
"Make no mistake about it: because of today’s decision, your DNA can be taken and entered into a national database if you are ever arrested, rightly or wrongly, and for whatever reason." Arkansas Times

PRISM mining UFO data, targets false flag ET invasion as pretext to space wars

New analysis of Edward Snowden’s June 9, 2013, interview with the U.K. Guardian newspaper reveals how the self-described NSA surveillance program whistleblower harbors unconscious concerns about PRISM being used to mine online UFO and ET contact-related data as part of an ongoing attempt by the U.S. government to implement tyrannical space wars initiatives.
The Guardian describes PRISM as a massive top secret online spying program that “facilitates extensive, in-depth surveillance on live communications and stored information. The law allows for the targeting of any customers of participating firms who live outside the US, or those Americans whose communications include people outside the US,” which also “opens the possibility of communications made entirely within the US being collected without warrants.”
A report published to alleged PRISM-sponsor YouTube claims that when Edward Snowden (a self-described former senior advisor for the Central Intelligence Agency) cites the emergence of “new and unpredicted threats” as a precedent for the assertion of claims by government to unconstitutional powers, the former telecommunications information systems officer is unconsciously referencing a false flag ET invasion scenario.
Click here to watch “Edward Snowden’s Secret NSA Surveillance UFO Message” on YouTube’s SecretMessageTV: “The secret that Edward Snowden dared not tell in his confessional video interview to the UK Guardian relates how the formerly top secret PRISM surveillance program is being used to mine online UFO and ET contact-related data in an attempt to build a false flag ET invasion case as a pretext to space wars and their understandably disastrous consequences.“
Unconscious Disclosure
Reports of involuntary secret messages encrypted backwards within human speech have been substantiated by real-world events including one revelation of military-grade intelligence pertaining to the “Shock and Awe” strikes against Baghdad two years prior to the beginning of the illegal U.S.-led 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Transmissions of these messages are detected through the principal of reflection in which audio recordings of human speech are digitally sampled then mirrored for reverse playback and monitoring. The principal of reflection is widely accepted for use in scientific and engineering applications, including the reflector telescope that offers indirect observation of light from celestial objects through the use of a highly-polished mirrored surface.
Occurrences of involuntary speech are further known through incidents of sleep-talking and Freudian slips, which convention dictates occur when unconscious signals override voluntary control of the speech organs to offer what can be highly-revealing statements of otherwise undisclosed truths.
With this understanding of applied reflection used in studies of involuntary human speech one can consider the following excerpt from the Guardian interview of Edward Snowden and the interpretation that follows.
Edward Snowden: “The only thing that restricts the activities of the surveillance state are policy. Even our agreements with other sovereign governments; we consider that to be a stipulation of policy rather than a stipulation of law. And because of that, a new leader will be elected, they’ll flip the switch, say that “Because of the crisis, because of the dangers that we face in the world”, you know, some new and unpredicted threat [emphasis added], “We need more authority, we need more power.” And there will be nothing the people can do at that point to oppose it. And it will be turn-key tyranny.”
Secret Message: “Those UFOs.”
False Flag Context
In a 2004 interview with investigative journalist Linda Moulton Howe, Institute for Security and Cooperation in Outer Space founder and president Dr. Carol Rosin related Dr. Wernher von Braun’s anticipation during the 1970s that terrorists, asteroids and ET’s would be categorized under an American "Enemy's List" to sustain “War Mode” and Pentagon budgets.
According to Dr. Rosin, the Project Paperclip scientist who led America's first landing on the moon in 1969 mentored her in how “starting where I entered the industry with the supposed Russian threat, but never actually existed ­ the Russians were made to be the enemy. Then there would be terrorists, Third World country threats. There would be an asteroid threat. They might even say to us to try to influence the public into believing that there are many reasons for why we should put weapons in space. There might be a reason to protect our assets in space.
“But, the real one that he was always holding off on and would say again with tears filling his eyes every time he said this to me repeatedly was that the last card they are holding is the 'alien card,' the extraterrestrial card and none of them are hostile [emphasis added]. In any way he could say those words, the intonation was always on, 'None of them are hostile. It's all a lie.' So, in other words, all the enemies that have been presented to us along the way ­ it's a lie with always the intention of seizing the high ground to keep the truth from us.”
Exopolitics characterizes these events as “a succession of "False Flag Wars" to follow the collapse of the permanent war economy's Communism vs. Capitalism war (1945-1991). These False Flag Wars start with a "War on Terror;" ; followed by a False Flag "War Against the Asteroids and Near Earth Objects;" and finally a False Flag "War Against Extraterrestrial Civilizations.”
“Each of these wars, starting with the False Flag operation of September 11, 2001 has had the weaponization of space and occupation of the solar system as a significant objective.”
For Reasons of Disclosure
During the Guardian interview, Edward Snowden cited his reasons for allegedly leaking the NSA PRISM documents. With the UFO and ET contact-related issues underlying his concerns now more clearly illuminated, his statements regarding a culture of denial begin to take on entirely new and perhaps unanticipated meaning.
“When you’re in positions of privileged access like a systems administrator for these sort of intelligence community agencies, you’re exposed to a lot more information on a broader scale than the average employee. And because of that you see things that may be disturbing but over the course of a normal person’s career you’d only see one or two of these instances.
“When you see everything, you see them on a more frequent basis. And you recognize that some of these things are actually abuses. And when you talk to people about them in a place like this where this is the normal state of business, people tend not to take them very seriously.”
“The more you talk about it the more you’re ignored, the more you’re told that it’s not a problem. Until eventually you realize that these things need to be determined by the public, not by somebody who was simply hired by the government [emphasis added].”
Targeting ET Persons
In light of the newly-revealed UFO and ET contact-related context in which the NSA PRISM leak appears to have occurred, further meaning can also be derived from U.S. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper’s written response, suggesting how PRISM could be targeting ET persons of interest.
The June 6, 2013 "DNI Statement on Activities Authorized Under Section 702 of FISA" describes how “Activities authorized by Section 702 are subject to oversight by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the Executive Branch, and Congress. They involve extensive procedures, specifically approved by the court, to ensure that only non-U.S. persons outside the U.S. are targeted [emphasis added], and that minimize the acquisition, retention and dissemination of incidentally acquired information about U.S. persons.”
PRISM’s FAA Cover
The origins of the acronym PRISM can be traced to the Federal Aviation Administration’s Privacy Impact Assessment program. According to the Department of Transportation website, the following explanations offer official cover for what has since been revealed as a massive corporate-sponsored online surveillance operation:
On why PRISM collects information: “PRISM collects information in order to fulfill basic accounting functions relating to the requisition of goods or services. The PRISM system collects PII only when an individual requires an accounting relationship with FAA.”
Regarding how PRISM uses information: “Users of PRISM are involved with the procurement of goods and services as well as the maintenance and security of the supporting information needed to accomplish these tasks for FAA. Included within a wide variety of groups who use PRISM are user organizations with staff functioning as Contracting Officer's Technical Representatives (COTRs); requisitioners of goods and services and their approvers; funds certifiers who ensure that the monies are available and are accurate; the actual Contracting Officer (CO) for each purchase made through PRISM; System Administrators (SAs); and site security officers who ensure that PRISM operates correctly and security requirements are met.”
Profound Lawlessness
During a June 9, 2013, interview with Iranian PressTV, international law expert Alfred Lambremont Webre argued that in terms of the alleged legality of NSA spying on Internet users, DNI “James Clapper is lying because under the Obama administration, his use of section 215 of the legislation that he’s citing, in which he’s saying that any tangible item of anyone can be taken, from financial records to any other records.
“The actions that he is undertaking violate the first amendment of the US Constitution of freedom of speech; the fourth amendment against unreasonable search and seizure; the fifth amendment against self-incrimination; and the fourteenth amendment as applied to all of the states. So, this is an absolute legal falsehood. And it goes along with the legal falsehood that the CIA earlier has attempted to give to the Obama drone program, which likewise is a violation of the Constitution.”
The founder of Exopolitics emphasized how with the implementation of online PRISM surveillance “Mr. Obama has in fact taken the title from George W. Bush and become the most lawless president in US history.”