Satanic Super Soldiers: The Sinister Reality of Trauma-Based Mind Control

Posted by: Russ Dizdar in ARTICLES, FEATURED June 6, 2013 //http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2013/06/satanic-super-soldiers-the-sinister-reality-of-trauma-based-mind-control/

Mind control? How would you know if you were…? A fearsome concept, a historic reality and a super-secret underground burgeoning technology. Are millions now under forms of mind control that will be used in the future to control, alter and transmute hundreds of millions more? Now just like before Auschwitz was ever visited the skeptic will ask with a scowl….How can this be?
What you’re about to read is not conjecture or just flying saucer conspiracy. The victims of this menace are already her by the millions. Their pain, stolen history and disfigured minds have sought to find reality, but reconstructing what has happened to them is like working on a 10,000 piece puzzle that the wind just scattered all over the ground. Though the process of figuring it all out piece by piece is arduous the growing puzzle is revealing the source, the perpetrators and purpose behind such a life consuming mind altering grip – technology from hell itself!
In this article I will touch on some of the main issues that are perplexing our minds but I will also focus on a technology so radically evil that to go there is to feel the hot smoke of hell itself. This radical form of mind control involves the subjugation of an entire life and the fact that it has captivated millions drives many to look away because of its implications and the possible retribution of its handlers.
Just to mention a few of what Jack Sparks author of  book from the 70’s called….‘THE MIND BENDERS’

The elimination of choice:

Just keep the public from knowing! It’s like out of sight out of mind, Right? Then they say the mind will not be burdened with all facts! However in reality the control of vital information is a form of control of what a mind (is allowed but by whom) can think about or choose. It seems clear, politicians do this all the time but where I heard and saw this used with an appeal to ‘protect the public’ was not at a political function but in a police training academy. The course was on satanic crimes the attendees were told to just deal with the crime and to NOT tell the public about the “scary satanic stuff” even though it was the motivation for the crime. If you just eliminate and or control information so that the public cannot hear, see, be warned, understand and or react, this ‘controlled information’ is a form of plotted mind or choice control. It keeps a person from knowing and reacting. You’re in the dark.

The pressure of indoctrination:

Just believe what I tell you. Go over it again and again! Don’t think about anything else. Don’t read anything else and don’t talk to anyone who tells you another story. Like in the Wizard of OZ: Don’t look at the man behind the curtain, just keep your mind on the delusion or deception being pumped into you. This is a form of mind control and forces one to look only in one direction. To only read, believe and follow a political or even cultic doctrine NOT because you have studied it, believe it and you choose to embrace it, but because you just ….MUST!
Not withheld information but forced information (indoctrination); an authoritarian do it or be punished approach that demands compliance or else. This is mind and life control. The Nazi SS soldier, Mao’s little red book and the Unification cult (Sun Moon) ‘divine principles’ comes to mind. Indoctrination forced in this way seeks to force the person, group or even nation to act only on what the indoctrinator wants. This ultimate forced mind and will compliance finds its culmination in the future when all must be forced to worship the Beast of the new world order. (See concept in the Book of Revelation 13)

Cults and totalism:

The old cults, many of which still exist, have captivated millions. Please think of this, millions! These cults still use things like 1) Love bombing you and pulling you into their group, school or job. 2) Moving you away from your known environment and then preoccupation with the new group of like minds. 3) With little sleep, lack of food and oh yes, your new clothes, you are now under what Robert Lifton called ‘TOTALISM’. Once again the elimination of not just information but the consuming of a person’s time, food, looks, location and process of free and thorough consideration. A consideration that involves thought, reflection, perception, discernment and the right to ask questions or go to trusted friends and family for their input. A real cult seeks to captivate you TOTALLY.

Voice to skull

A bull horn is one thing but what about a machine or device that can send thoughts? And what if you did not know ‘they’ were using this machine and sending you messages? The technologies that are here now are scary. If they have a machine that can send thoughts then my first question is how do you defend yourself against that? Can I have a shield or a countermeasures machine? Who is in control of the machine? What thoughts are they sending? Is this a weapon where military psy-ops team can point the machine at the enemy and (by thoughts sent) tell the enemy to surrender? Or as one experienced in “voice to skull” Eleanor White states:  “One especially invasive attack method in the arena of ‘psycho-electronic’ mind control is ‘voice to skull’. Voice to skull is the transmission of voice, or any other audible or subliminal sound, directly into the hearing sense of the mind control victim. This is sometimes done around the clock and can be one of the severest forms of torture. Voice to skull technology is sometimes referred to as “synthetic telepathy”. (http://targetedindividualscanada.wordpress.com/ )

Non-human intelligences:

What about other worldly beings? You know aliens, spirits, dark angels and even the devil? The claims are many concerning the abilities and agendas of aliens and demons. The Nazis referred to these beings as ‘non-human intelligences’ claimed to be out there communicating with human kind. The Nazis even had the ‘hall of the dead’ in Himmler’s castle where SS leaders could go to ‘meditate’ on the human skulls of past leaders in order to get a ‘message’ for an advantage in war. We can also look at Dr. Steven Greer who says he interacted with extra dimensional beings. His pursuit to engage and welcome them has lead to claims of having made contact with the Orion’s (beings from out in space) which also led him to claim he has over 300 US government officials from even the CIA and DOD as part of his believers. His new film ‘Sirius’ just now being pushed will influence many more to believe and seek these beings: Whoever they really are.
Many of the new remote viewers speak of beings out there in the ‘either’. Ed Dames admits in his last book, ‘TELL ME WHAT YOU SEE’ that the ability to do remote viewing comes from the ‘hall of records’ (akashic records) and that is where the ‘data’ (information) comes from. But who sends the information? Are the Orion’s and the beings from the Akashic Records controlling, influencing or pumping the data they want humanity to believe? And then there is the man from the NSA who claims he was used to receive information from outside non-human intelligences. Dan Sherman says:  “The story I’ve documented in this book is an authentic first level account of the existence of aliens. It is a story of my personal experiences as an intuitive communicator with the United States Air Force (USAF), while working for the National Security Agency (NSA). My going public with this story will hopefully be considered by historians of the future as the catalyst that opened the gate to the flow of relevant and concrete information.”

The bottom of the rung

SRA MPD DID…… the broadest and most covert form of mind control?
And then there is satanic ritual abuse, multiple personality disorder (which they now call dissociative identity disorder). This is the main focus of my article and will be the most eye opening. The information I now write is well…not supposed to be on the table per say.
In the 1980’s thousands of individuals with voices in their heads began showing up at psych wards and counseling centers everywhere. By 1992  Dr. Holly Hector who worked in the psych ward at Centennial Hospital in Denver stated that there is an estimated 2.4 million victims of ‘multiple personality disorder’. Going beyond that Dr. Collin Ross in his original first edition ‘PROJECT BLUEBIRD: the purposeful creation of multiple personalities’ agrees with an assessment that there may be 10 million victims of this form of mind and life control.
Ten million! Those numbers are astounding and force us to ask many questions. 1. What is this MPD? 2. How exactly is it caused? 3. Who is causing this?  4. Why are they doing it?
If in the USA alone we have 10 million victims of this ‘disorder’, that is massive and huge. Let’s start with question one and proceed to the sinister side of all this:

1. What is MPD? The definition is basically that a person has more than one personality. They have the main person who we may talk to and know and then they have inside them a number of other personalities different than the main person. Some call these other personalities ‘sub persons’, ‘alters’, ‘alter personalities’ but as stated in the diagnostic books of the DSM3 and DSM4 (diagnostic manuals of the American Psychological Association) the victims have been forced to create inside them these separate sub persons. The stress in the definition is that the ‘alter’ personalities inside are distinct, have their own memories, age and personality. Though some may write this off as ‘mentally crazy’ the issue is far from that. They victims are not crazy; they are victims of a mind control technology that goes back to the Nazis and Dr. Mengele himself. This mind control includes the purposeful creation of these sub persons who are then programmed (a mental/mind control imposing an agenda) and here is the kicker…there really are millions of them and they are also found in Canada, Australia, England, Ireland, Germany, Italy and other nations which begs many more questions!
2. How exactly is it caused? Well, all of the book authors (and there are many now) tell us the same thing: It’s ‘trauma based’. The cause for the creation of the ‘alter personalities’ is from severe trauma (mental and emotional). A person is pushed so far mentally that they ‘snap’ or ‘split’ and the main person goes down and a new part of them appears. The forced new part is the one that takes in all the pain and abuse. When the trauma is over the new ‘sub person’ goes down and the main person as if they were sleeping comes back up (to consciousness) the main person doesn’t remember because the ‘sub person’ has encoded the bad or traumatic episode.Those who know how to cause this split are called ‘splitters’. As in hypnosis a hypnotist gets the main person out of the way and then creates mentally a new persona. A stage hypnotist will then get the new persona to do things they normally would not do…things they don’t know they are doing and then when the hypnotized person is brought back…they don’t remember. In the purposeful creation of MPD the ‘splitters’ are creating permanent sub alters, sub persons who can then be programmed, trained and assigned to tasks.  Programmed for what? Trained by whom? Assigned to do what type of tasks? All of this is done with the goal that the main person will stay clueless.
3. Who then is doing this? Tens of thousands of victims of this MPD have come forward in these last 30 years. They have remembered the stories of who did this and the ‘who’ did this to them is sobering. Inside each victim are personalities who know what they have been through and do remember some of the perpetrators. They tell the stories of military, psychiatrists, doctors, labs, bases, covens, programming and so much more. The readers of this may be very familiar with ‘the Monarch’ ‘Phoenix’ and the projects in MK Ultra, Artichoke and others. The victims and now the dozens of books on the subject (see some listed under sources) tell us that this started with the Nazis who wanted to create a master race of controlled super soldiers (see Secret Weapons by Dale Griffis, The Manchurian Candidate by John Marks, The Black Awakening; rise of the satanic super soldier by Russ Dizdar, Journey into Madness by Gordon Thomas or The CIA Doctors by Colin Ross to start with. The claims of thousands, the volumes of books now written and after personally working with MPD victims for over 25 years tell us: a. the Nazi doctors, b. the CIA, c. specialized ‘satanic covens’ d. globalist elites are synced together as the perpetrators and that they work together in a very sinister multinational project.
4. Why are they doing this? This is the million dollar question and the answers will cause some to look away and pretend it just can’t be. From some of the other books but mainly from my work directly with many victims the sexual, mental, emotional and physical abuse is only part of the process. The reason for it all is (if it were possible) even more sinister. The splitting to create sub personalities includes programing those sub personalities to be assassins, bombers, killers, infiltrators, spies and eventually troops of a new Reich! They say they are the coming chaos makers etc.

The Monarch Project and even Thomas McGowan’s book ‘PROGRAMMED TO KILL points to this. My book THE BLACK AWAKEING: Rise of the satanic super soldiers gives deep details. The claims are: A. ‘They’ are doing this to create an army. B. They create, program (mentally) and are training millions of these ‘chosen ones’ to be troops. C. Most of the victims are intact and are sleepers waiting to be triggered. D. It all relates to a new world order. E. They have been placed in government, law enforcement, military and churches purposely! Most of which for now are sleepers. F. They are in numerous other countries created and placed same way.

But now for the kicker:

I can talk about the biblical end time prophecies and what the dark satanic agenda is all about. Some will listen others will look the other way and watch some more TV. But if you know about the end time events, antichrist and coming Armageddon from the Bible please realize that the fulfillment of these (like in all Biblical prophecies) has real places, people and events with boots on the ground. What I tell you now must be looked into quickly and when anyone does they, like myself and others will realized This mind control agenda is so vast, so deep and so far advanced that it’s like we are 50 years behind in scratching at the surface of a runaway bull that we know now ….can’t be stopped.
The kicker to all of this is found in a little book by a once renowned (in the sinister way) worldwide known psychologist who was hired by US military to help in the ‘super soldier’ experimentation. Enter G.H. Estabrooks and his little book HYPNOTISM and especially the chapter on ‘the weaponizaton’ of creating sub persons in solders to make programmed super soldiers.
G H Estabrooks tells us that they know how and used soldiers who had ‘alter’ personalities created within them. They created the alter persons and kept the main person amnesic (blind to it). They programmed sub persons inside to be a. assassins, b. reconnaissance agents, c. infiltrators, d. spies, e. sowers of disinformation (they could create/program) the sub persons to be whatever they wanted. They then created ‘cues’, triggers’, ‘phrases’ they would give to the sub persons so when they (the handlers splitters programmers) would trigger them the sub person would come up do the job (programmed task) and then go back down inside with the main person coming back and not knowing what was done or when (missing time).   Now more of the kicker: G. H. Estabrooks revelations of what they could do in creating mind controlled programmed super soldiers was released in 1944. They were taking the technology from the Nazis and using it way back in 1944. Ramifications, they have had a long time to create many mind controlled, programmed shooters, bombers, assassins etc. and to hold them as sleepers to be used at the will of the handlers.

And now the final kicker in all of this mind control:

In 1944, G H Estabrooks  upon revealing this process (and he called it then multiple personalities) in his chapter on weaponizing mind control for warfare made this startling revelation: He stated that the US government military must create many of these programmed soldiers and place them in all the departments of US military. Why? G H Estabrooks says so that we can have a 5^th column of sleeper soldiers for the future.
Hmmm, a hidden programmed nationwide army to be used for what?
It is the belief of this author that G H Estabrooks from way back in 1944 was trying to spill the beans of a long range agenda that is in place right now. The goal Estabrooks has revealed is among us. Tens of thousands of programmed sleeper shooters, bombers, killers and chaos makers. It is the belief of this author that Estabrooks was only ‘scratching’ at the surface of what is now a:
Multi-continental, multi-national deeply and supernaturally hidden agenda that is behind the current global melt down. It is paving the way for the coming chaos that forces the way to a new order just as ‘they’ the controllers have plotted. And behind the globalist elites (‘them’), if you’re ready for it is hell’s kitchen and mind controlling powers of darkness. The conclusion… mind control is much more sinister then we thought.

Russ Dizdar
Radio Host THE RAGGED EDGE
Conference speaker
Author of The Black Awakening Rise of the satanic super soldier
Forth coming books ‘ONCE BLIND’ and R1919: the real reason for Armageddon

 Sources

1. THE MIND BENDERS, By Jack Sparks, T. Nelson; 1st Edition, 4th Printing edition (1977)

2. Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism: A Study of Brainwashing in China, University of N. Carolina Press (July 1, 1989)

3.  http://targetedindividualscanada.wordpress.com/2010/06/24/article-what-is-voice-to-skull/

4. http://disclosureproject.org/ Dr. Steven Greer

5. Above Black: Project Preserve Destiny, Dan S Order Dept, LLC; Sixth Printing edition (1998)

6. Sherman, Dan (2006-03-01). ABOVE BLACK – Project Preserve Destiny – An Insider’s Account of Alien Contact and Government Coverup (Kindle Locations 38-41).  . Kindle Edition.

7. Transmuting the mind and soul

8. Satan and Associates by Wendell Amstutz National Counseling Resource Center; 5th edition (1992) Quoting Dr Holly Hector

9. Secret Weapons : Two Sisters’ Terrifying True Story of Sex, Spies and Sabotage by Dale Griffis and Ted Swartz New Horizon Press; First Edition (February 15, 2001)

10. MILITARY MIND CONTROL By Colin Ross Manitou Communications Inc. (October 24, 2011)

11. AND THE CIA DOCTORS By Colin Ross Greenleaf Book Group Press (October 1, 2011)

12. The Search for the “Manchurian Candidate”: The CIA and Mind Control: The Secret History of the Behavioral Sciences by John Marks, W. W. Norton & Company; Reissue edition (August 17, 1991)

13. JOURNEY INTO MADNESS By Gordon Thomas, Bantam (1989)

14. PROGRAMMED TO KILL By Thomas McGowan, iUniverse, Inc. (August 16, 2004)

15. HYPNOTISM By G H Estabrooks, New York E.P. Dutton & Co. inc.; 3rd Printing. edition (1944)

16. THE BLACK AWAKENING rise of the satanic super soldier by Russ Dizdar LuLu press 2009

Mysterious Disappearances, National Parks, and the Break Away Civilization – Evidence of Batch Consignments?

Posted by: Olav Phillips in ARTICLES, FEATURED January 7, 2014 //http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2014/01/mysterious-disappearances-national-parks-and-the-break-away-civilization-evidence-of-batch-consignments/

One of the things which has always been perplexing about the Break Away Civilization was the notion of “Batch Consignments.” Batch Consignments was a term used in Alternative Three to describe the movement of individuals off-world for use as slave labor to construct bases on the Moon and Mars. The idea of Batch Consignments was to use effectively slave labor as a commodity work force for construction of the bases needed by the Break Aways for expansion.

On the surface the idea seems quiet reprehensible, people being forcibly relocated and forced to perform slave labor, but then again you are dealing with a group which does not necessarily hold human life in high regard, but it does make sense. It is cheaper to use slave labor then to use a skilled group of people to perform any task.
So here’s the problem – How do you prove that Batch Consignments exist? A relatively large workforce would be needed, the work would be grueling and the mortality rate would probably be high due to accidents, overwork and other causes. So you would need a constant supply of new people being kidnapped to provide the labor force. So where do you get large numbers of people over a long term? The answer, at least in part, may surprise you.
Ever year thousands of people go missing under mysterious circumstances. Accidents, murder, and many other reasons can provide the context. Recently there have been many stories about people kidnapped who spent decades in captivity before escaping to tell their story, but there are others which actually defy conventional logic.

Most batch consignments, if they exist, can be attributed to political instability in the third world. During many of the regional wars seen in Eastern Europe, Africa, and South East Asia instability and large numbers of displaced individuals provide a large source of labor. During these conflicts entire villages could disappear without a trace with little or no attention and the level of humanitarian catastrophe in the worn torn regions makes it almost impossible to catalog the number of people displaced, lost or just vanished.
During the Rwanda Genocide in 1994 more then 800,000 people were murdered and hundreds of thousands simply vanished and are presumed dead. This would represent men, women and children and some of those individuals could have become batch consignments very easily.
But there is another mystery which was discovered by researcher, and ex police officer, David Paulides. Paulides has undertaken research into disappearance clusters and his research has proved some very interesting results. On one hand he has documented numerous cases where, in National Parks, children have disappeared within feet of their parents only to be found miles away sometimes even over mountain ranges with no recollection of how they got to that location.
In other cases he has documented cases where people simply vanished leaving their cloths in a pile as if they were snatched from within their clothes. Their clothes simply simply piled where the person had been standing. In both cases dogs were unable to pick up the scent, which is strange, it was as if the person just dematerialized.
Whats more interesting is the locations of the clusters of disappearances. If we look at the map which Paulides has made, we can see that at least some of clusters are located near places like Tonopah/Area 51/Nellis, Edwards AFB, Sandia, as well as many other major installations which could be used for movement. In fact many of the disappearances are reasonably close to facilities documented on a map made by “TAL” dating back to 1990 where he documented secret underground bases and a secret underground rail network which links them. The match is pretty uncanny.


More over Paulides has documented numerous cases of disappearances inside National Parks, and when people inquire with the NPS about the disappearances? They are stone walled and told the National Parks Service does not keep records of disappearances. This lead Paulides and others to file FOIA requests which have as of yet provided no further information.
In fact on occasion researchers have even been intimidated by National Parks Service personnel when filling FOIA requests. So why the secrecy? One would think the NPS would be doing whatever they could to locate the missing campers or hikers. One would also imagine that, given the numbers of visitors, the NPS would be working hard to protect people which I think they do to some major extent but you still cannot escape the fact that many of these clusters are in National Parks. But that also makes sense.
If you want to harvest labor you are going to go where people are, and there are a lot of them in National Parks. They also provide a good cover – Well Bob went hiking and got lost case closed. But the patterns Paulides is finding is disturbing. As Paulides put it in an interview with George Knapp:
“People disappear in the wilderness all the time. We’re talking about something different. These are unusual things that don’t make sense, that happen to cluster together in three to four, sometimes as many as 20 to 30 people missing at one location.”
The numbers here, at least the numbers we know, are fairly small. Paulides has found about 400 cases so far of strange disappearances but that is what he has found. The actual number could be far higher, and is high enough that he has written four books on the subject. So I think he’s touching the tip of the iceberg.
He has also documented large number of disappearances of young people in Canada where young men and women have disappeared from native villages, and again there is no official comment.
Could these disappearances be linked? I think its possible especially when comparing his map to that of TAL’s map. It is very odd to me that even given the small geography TAL represented that there are clusters of missing persons around his facilities. That is just strange to me, but it also makes sense. You need to be able to take people somewhere for transport.
Will we ever know for sure that is whats going on? I don’t think we will but one thing is for sure – The next time I go into the wilderness or a National Park which is a hot spot I will be keeping a close eye on my friends and family.
For more information on David Paulides amazing research you can visit:
The CANAM Missing Persons Project – http://www.canammissing.com/page/page/8396197.htm

The Tangled Web Icke Weaves: Who is Behind David Icke’s Freedom Foundation?

Posted by: Olav Phillips in ARTICLES January 24, 2013//http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2013/01/the-tangled-web-icke-weaves-who-is-behind-david-ickes-freedom-foundation/

by Will Banyan
Mocking David Icke’s judgment has long been the sport of various wags in the mainstream media. Back in 1991, he memorably came to grief on BBC1 when Terry Wogan punctured his seemingly confident façade with a scathing reminder to the savant in the turquoise shellsuit that the studio audience was actually, ”laughing at you. They’re not laughing with you.”
Since then Icke has managed to attract ridicule from his fellow conspiracists, most notably when he launched into his reptilian thesis all guns blazing, convinced that he alone had happened onto the truth. The ”biggest crock to be foisted on the public in many moons,” declared an incredulous Jim Keith, after reading Icke’s magnum opus on the reptilians, The Biggest Secret (1999).Despite some testiness, Icke insists such criticism has been water off a duck’s back.
Such defenses are definitely an asset as Icke continues to feed perceptions that his judgment is suspect. Mid-way through 2006, Icke announced on his website that he was forced to take legal action against long-time collaborator Royal Adams, who had taken control of all his writings. This was an ironic turn of events, given that Icke had dedicated his most recent book, Infinite Love is the Only Truth, Everything Else is Illusion (2006), to Royal Adams for his “magnificent work” in keeping his books “in circulation.” Icke had also dedicated The Biggest Secret, “to Royal, for all his great work in America.” To have misjudged the trustworthiness of a close collaborator for so long is quite a feat, but in his efforts to deal with this thorny legal issue Icke seems to have made another blunder.
The Freedom Foundation
Going to court is costly, even for a man who seems to believe the world we live in is, in fact, a hologram. In February 2007, Icke’s fundraising took an interesting turn with an announcement titled: “The Freedom Foundation: Funding the Truth Instead of the System.” Icke’s website gave U.S. citizens the opportunity to make a “charitable” tax-deductible donation to Icke’s Freedom Foundation through the International Humanities Center (IHC). The donee was offered the chance to, “support someone working full-time for up to 12 hours a day to expose those behind the global conspiracy to enslave us all.”
Tax-exempt foundations were first identified as a tool of New World Order conspirators back in the 1950s by the Congressional Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations (Reece Committee). According to that Committee:
In the international field, foundations, and an interlock among some of them and certain intermediary organizations, have exercised a strong effect upon our foreign policy and upon public education in things international. This has been accomplished by vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisors to government, and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the purse. The net result of these combined efforts has been to promote ‘internationalism’ in a particular sense; a form directed toward ‘world government’ and a derogation of American ‘nationalism.’
Numerous researchers drew on that report and the book, Foundations: Their Power and Influence (1958), written by the Committee’s general counsel, Rene Wormser, to conclude that such foundations were a problem. John A. Stormer’s path-breaking None Dare Call It Treason (1964), for example, devoted an entire chapter to explaining how “the money of American capitalists—Ford, Rockefeller, Carnegie, Guggenheim, etc.—has largely financed those working for the establishment of a ‘new world order’” (Stormer, 173).
Icke, though, appears to have given the IHC his seal of approval. Given his record of opposing the Illuminati, most supporters would be confident that the IHC meets David Icke’s exacting standards. Nevertheless, in lieu of any detailed explanation from Icke assuring us of its suitability, it is surely prudent to ask some questions about the IHC. What are its objectives? Who runs it? What does it do? Where does it get its funding?
See No Evil
According to its website, the mission of the IHC is to “work with other independent non-profit organizations and sponsored projects that are devoted to a vision of ecological and humanitarian stewardship that benefits all of creation.” Ultimately, the IHC seeks to “reverse the current situation of pollution, disease, and disconnection by focusing efforts on creating a civilization that is centered upon love, peace, and natural harmony.”
According to its recently issued Operations Manual, the IHC was established in 1988 as a “fiscal sponsorship program that deploys education, services and ecologically responsible technologies to the benefit of the general public.” The primary function of the IHC is to provide financial and administrative services to “grassroots projects.” As a 501[c](3) non-profit public charity, donors can be sure of retaining their tax-exempt status when they give money to a specific project via the IHC. In return, the IHC levies a “Minimum Annual Fee” of either $200, or 5% of the donations received by a member, whichever is larger.
Looking closer, one discovers a few interesting facts that should have piqued the interest of an analyst of Icke’s calibre. The IHC’s Financial Director, Catherine Carroll, was a co-founding director of the Renaissance Foundation, a “leadership organisation,” according to its website. One of its sub-programs is the “Renaissance Women” a group “whose goal is to give women an alternative voice from radical feminism.” Back in 2000 this was realised as “support for George W. Bush,” though we were assured this support was not given as a collective, but as “individuals” (WorldNetDaily, Aug. 2, 2000).
Board member Katherine O’Flahtery was once a trouble-shooter for Wal-Mart logistics. The IHC Operations Director, Dave Sanders, before going green fifteen years ago, spent seventeen years as a contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy, the U.S. Department of Defense and GE-Nuclear. IHC Executive Director Steve Sugarman, a professional psychologist, was a former Executive Director of the Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (SEE), Co-Founder of the Bolsa Chica Stewardship Group, and author of The Blueprint for Planetary Evolution.
Prepared partly as a response to the events of 9/11, Blueprint is a “holistic picture” of the “fronts of the ecosocial movement … in the context of the present world situation.” That present world situation Sugarman presents as a “catastrophe,” the “sixth extinction crisis” to have hit the Earth; though, in this case, it is “altogether human-caused, and happening at a phenomenal pace.” Sugarman’s solution to this crisis is to embrace the values of “Deep Ecology,” which in practice means creating a “bioregional” society by breaking up cities into “ecovillages.” In this “ecosocial” utopia of “planned communities” the global economy would be supplanted by “regional economies.” Many international institutions, such as the WTO and IMF, would become defunct and the multi-national corporations would be broken down into local entities.
For people who like to throw themselves, or sharp objects, at the barricades that surround most Group of Eight meetings, this “ecosocial” agenda would seem familiar and admirable. Reader’s of Icke’s collected works would also note some similarities: not long ago Icke had entranced readers with his account of the conspiracy hatched by a “Luciferian consciousness.” He offered his solution of “World Cooperation” in which national governments would be eliminated and replaced by a hierarchy of organisations: neighbourhood councils, community councils, community forums, regional governments and finally a “world forum” (Icke, 1994, 276-78). Only eighteen years ago, during his salad days as the national spokesman for the UK Green Party, Icke advocated breaking up the multi-national corporations into “smaller, less powerful units on at least a national and ideally a regional basis” (Icke, 1989, 80-81).
Perhaps the least palatable aspect of Sugarman’s vision is his grim advice on the global population problem. According to Sugarman, a “decrease in global human population is absolutely necessary.” He noted that Thomas Malthus’ warnings about the dangers of overpopulation are “proving to be correct” with “[w]ar, hunger, disease and ecological devastation … the order of the day.” Exactly how this problem is to be resolved, Sugarman does not say, but he insists that a “conscious effort to stabilize the current level of human saturation is necessary,” after which a “steady decrease can be implemented.” Of course, Sugarman warns that he is “not suggesting this will be easy” and is unlikely to be popular, but it must be dealt with.
To sign up to a foundation directed by a man who advances such an agenda would seem courageous, especially if one had warned previously about how the overpopulation crisis owed much to the machinations of the sinister Club of Rome and the Rockefeller-founded and funded Population Council (Icke, 1997, 176-9). But it’s easy if you once publicly embraced that agenda yourself:
Once again humankind has a choice to make. We can be sensible and limit our numbers voluntarily or we can go on until nature does it for us with disease and hunger. That will be deeply unpleasant for those around at the time…and the time isn’t too far off (Icke, 1990, 87).
And if you continue to show in your writings and other utterances that you haven’t quite let go of the idea that there’s too many people in the world:
It is plainly true, as the New World Order promoters say, that there is a limit to the number of human beings who can live on this planet. You can’t argue with that because when there is a humanbeing for every square foot of the Earth, there will be clearly too many. (Icke, 1997, 165).
On its website, the IHC makes clear that, “Once your project is reviewed and deemed in alignment with our charter…” support will be provided. Well, Icke’s project was deemed “in alignment” and they’re now helping him out.
In Esteemed Company
Before joining the IHC, Sugarman was Executive Director of Social & Environmental Entrepreneurs. Like the IHC, SEE is a “public charity” that provides start-up guidance and other services to its member groups. SEE describes its mission as being to “empower, encourage and catalyze individuals to facilitate progressive change in areas of social justice and ecological restoration.” The SEE Program was created in September 1994 by the EarthWays Foundation as an affiliate organisation. The Earthways Foundation was established in 1988 by Andrew Beath, a successful corporate real-estate developer, who turned his attention to social justice and environmental philanthropy some twenty years ago. Beath is currently Executive Director of both EarthWays and the SEE.
The objective of EarthWays, according to Beath’s letter on its website, is to “find a deeper understanding of our relationship to the natural world,” and to “restore an appropriate balance” between our economic needs and the environment. At EarthWays, “We are crying for a vision that all living things can share,” claims Beath. “From this inward crying,” he continues, “comes personal awareness that gives direction to our desire to take action. Personal transformation is the first step to global change.” Readers who find these sentiments similar to Icke’s metaphysical ramblings can presumably find more insights in Beath’s book, Consciousness in Action.
In 1998, EarthWays received $50,000 from the Rockefeller Foundation for its role as an organizing partner of the 1999 World Festival of Sacred Music—an event billed by its organizers as a way to “transcend borders of all kinds—linguistic, national, cultural, ideological, racial and religious.” The Rockefeller Foundation gave EarthWays a further $42,837 in 2000 to film the festival; and in 2002 it granted EarthWays $100,000 to help with the costs for the 2002 World Festival of Sacred Music. Additional funds came from Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors, which donated “$10,000 or more” to EarthWays between 2002 and 2004 (RPA, 2005, 16-17).
As for the SEE, which granted the IHC $338,689 in 2003 and $143,568 in 2004, where its funds ultimately come from is unknown, and few of its member groups bother to include details of their sponsors. However, among the plethora of seemingly fringe environmental and social justice projects it counts as members, the SEE provides support to groups with strong Establishment connections.
Consider the Truman Security Forum (TSF), an organisation that describes itself as a “non-partisan, national security institute dedicated to creating a strong principled alternative to conservative national security policies.” The Executive Director of the TSF is Rachel Kleinfeld, a Rhodes scholar and former consultant to the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), and member of the Board of Trustees of the Blue Fund, a body dedicated to securing corporate support for the Democrats. On the TSF’s seven-member Board of Advisers we find former Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) President Leslie Gelb, former Secretary of State, Madeline Albright, and former Secretary of Defense, William Perry.
As for the Rockefeller connection, it appears to have jumped the SEE and landed in the IHC. In its 990 form for 2005, the innocuous Philanthropic Collaborative (New York) is identified as donating $40,000 to the IHC. A search on the internet reveals the Philanthropic Collaborative to be an offshoot of Rockefeller Philanthropic Advisers, itself a non-profit offshoot of Rockefeller Financial Services (Strom 2002). Established in 2002, Rockefeller Philanthropic Advisers (on its board: Clayton Rockefeller, Sharon P. Rockefeller and Steven C. Rockefeller, Jr.) created the Philanthropic Collaborative so its clients can “make gifts inside and outside the United States, participate in funding consortia, and operate non-profit initiatives.”
Icke has previously denounced the Rockefeller family as “reptilian full-bloods” (Icke, 1999, 45) and the “bloodline branch managers in America … who, quite provably, decide who is going to be President” (ibid, 190). Icke is also on record describing the Rockefeller Foundation as a “tax-exempt New World Order front” (Icke, 1997, 133), as well as claiming that it set CIA policy (ibid, 285), and has funded research into computers that can control the human mind (ibid, 374). Icke warned that the Rockefeller Foundation is part of an “endless web of interconnecting groups” that interlocks with the Illuminati and other sinister organisations (1999, 263). In fact, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Rockefeller Family Fund and the Rockefeller-connected Mellon Foundations “poured millions into the environmental campaigns and pressure groups” to create the modern green movement (Icke, 1997, 243).
According to Icke, Rhodes Scholars, such as Kleinfeld, are “selected by the Brotherhood,” in accordance with their “genetic history,” to be “indoctrinated into the ‘world government’ Agenda.” Icke notes that most Rhodes Scholars “return to their own countries and enter positions of overt or covert power” (Icke, 1999, 218). TSF Advisor Madeline Albright is a “Brotherhood initiate” and the “High Priestess of U.S. politics” who “knows about the U.S. government mind-controlled slaves and supports that policy” (Icke, 1999, 340). Her colleague, Leslie Gelb, is easily condemned given that the CFR controls U.S. foreign policy, and its goal is “to introduce world government” (Icke, 1997, 85). Secretary of Defense, William Perry, whom Icke identifies as a Bilderberger (Icke, 1999, 267), belongs to a secretive organisation that is part of “a highly effective network of manipulation which comprises a very significant element of the secret government of the world” (Icke, 1997, 138).
A Scaly Handout
Another donor of interest on the IHC’s 990 Form for 2005 is the Tides Foundation, which donated $55,000. According to its own records, the Tides Foundation actually gave nearly $90,000 in grants to three IHC members: $20,000 to the Coalition Against Militarism in Our Schools; $64,000 to Voter Action; and $3,700 to WildPlaces.
Founded in 1976 by former activist Drummond Pike, the Tides Foundation styles itself as a vehicle for “positive social change through philanthropy,” organising donors in the cause of “strengthening community-based non-profit organizations and the progressive movement through innovative grant making.” Critics charge that the Tides Foundation is in the business of enabling big foundations to anonymously fund various radical and controversial groups. As Ben Johnson explains in 57 Varieties of Radical Causes:
Tides allows donors to anonymously contribute money to a variety of causes—and thereby avoid public accountability for their donations. The donor simply makes the check out to Tides and instructs the Foundation where to forward the money. Tides does so, often keeping as much as ten percent of the total amount for “charitable advisory fees.” This allows high-profile individuals to fund extremist organizations by “laundering” their money through Tides, leaving no paper trail (Johnson 2004).
The San Francisco Bay Guardian made a similar observation in a 1997 article: “Wealthy patrons give big chunks of money to Tides—and their names are kept confidential. The Tides donation is completely tax deductible. But the donor can discreetly designate an organization that he or she wants to see receive the money—and Tides will pass the donation along, minus a small administrative fee. Often, the recipient group doesn’t know where the money really came from. And there’s no way for the public to find out either (Cohen 2006, 2).
A look at the top funders of the Tides Foundation gives a sense of this. According to Activist Cash, the top funder was the Pew Charitable Trust, which provided Tides with $118 million between 1990 and 2002. Other key Establishment foundations also contributed: the Ford Foundation provided $36 million between 1989 and 2005; George Soros’ Open Society Institute donated $15.7 million (1997-2003); the Rockefeller Foundation gave $2.9 million (1993-2002); $2.3 million from the Carnegie Corporation (1992-2002); the Rockefeller Brothers Fund gave $1.9 million in 1993-2003, plus a further $250,000 in 2005; Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisers gave $372,300 (1997-2001) and the Rockefeller Family Fund donated $175,000 (1991-2001). Tides also received some $6 million from Heinz Endowments, the foundation run by Teresa Heinz Kerry, the wife of Senator John Kerry, the Skull & Bones man who ran against George W. Bush in 2004.
Tides has used this money to help fund a variety of organisations, ranging from violent anarchists such as the Ruckus Society, to the Council for American Islamic Relations, the Union of Concerned Scientists, Greenpeace, and now three projects under the wing of the International Humanities Center.
Any reader of David Icke’s books would know the origins of the Tides Foundation’s money alone would make it a suspect institution. Most of these foundations, claims Icke, form part of the “network of so-called tax-exempt foundations started by the Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Ford families, which help to fund the New World Order plan” (Icke, 1997, 67). To make matters more interesting, sitting on the Tides Foundation’s Board of Directors is Joanie Bronfman.
Bronfman is described in glowing terms on the Tides website and in its Annual Reports as a “long-time advocate for social justice and donor activism.” Bronfman has been identified by various sources as an “heiress to the Seagram whiskey fortune” (Noah 2001) and as a member of the “Old Money … Bronfman family” (Marcus, 1989, 266). A professional “wealth counsellor,” Joanie Bronfman has established herself as an expert helping the rich overcome the malicious social practice of “wealthism.” She explained this hitherto undiagnosed condition her 1987 PhD thesis, The Experience of Inherited Wealth: A Social-Psychological Perspective: “Wealthism includes those actions or attitudes that dehumanize or objectify wealthy people, simply because they are wealthy. The main attitudes of wealthism are envy, awe and resentment. . . . Wealthism differs from the other ‘isms’ in that racism and sexism are perpetrated by those who have power, whereas wealthism is directed at those who have power.”
Bronfman has devoted a lot of time to convincing the wealthy that being rich can be positive experience. The Tides Foundation website notes that Joanie Bronfman had previously “served on the boards of Tides Canada and the Threshold Foundation, where she was a founder of Threshold’s Social Justice Committee.” Tides Canada has made its contribution to our future by distributing copies of Al Gore’s doom-laden presentation on global warming, An Inconvenient Truth, to schools in Canada.
The co-founder of the Threshold Foundation—which describes itself as “a progressive foundation and a community of individuals united through wealth, who mobilize money, people and power to create a more just, joyful and sustainable world”—was Jeffrey Bronfman. According to the Vancouver Sun (Feb. 10, 2001), Jeffrey is the “second cousin to Edgar Bronfman Jr. and grandnephew to Seagram’s dynasty founder Samuel Bronfman.”
All of this would seem to be a trivial matter, except that David Icke has repeatedly attacked the Bronfman family of Canada, the founders of the same Seagrams liquor company, as respectively: an “underworld family” (Icke 1997, 290); “a reptilian bloodline and very close to the Rothschilds” (Icke, 2001, 387); one of the Illuminati’s “key bloodlines” (Icke, 2001, 410); and as the “Illuminati Bronfman family” (Icke, 2003, 411). More significantly Icke has claimed that it was “the Bronfmans, through various front organizations and stooges,” who were behind a global campaign to suppress his books and speaking tours (Icke 2001, 387). But now he has teamed up with an organization that receives money from a foundation with a Bronfman on its board.
Tangled Web
David Icke is not the first researcher to warn of the insidious influence of the tax-exempt foundations. The pioneering work on this issue was done by the Reece Committee in the 1950s and brought to a larger audience from the 1960s onward by a diverse range of authors including, Kent and Phoebe Courtney (1962, 19-26); Allan Stang (1968, 115-123); William P. Hoar (1984, 74); Gurudas (1996, 21-22); and Jim Marrs (2000, 53). Researchers, such as Bob Feldman and Left Gatekeepers.com, have established links between the leading foundations and environmentalist / progressive movements in the U.S., from The Nation to Noam Chomsky.
Icke must be the first of the much-maligned members of the conspiracist camp, if not one of its most radical thinkers, to actually go from attacking that network to joining it. The question for Icke’s many admirers is why has this happened? It would be tempting to attribute this to an oversight on his part, perhaps attributable to the stress of his recent court case; except that this is not the first time Icke has worked with the IHC. In 2004, there was the David Icke/Metta Arts project, the funding of which was controlled by the IHC. It is alleged by one source that Icke was informed by one of his concerned fans that the IHC had a Rockefeller connection. In response, Icke reportedly insisted that the connection was of little consequence and that he was not longer dealing with the IHC.
If true, this alleged dismissal of the IHC’s Rockefeller connection by Icke would be heartening to all those individuals Icke has smeared over the years due to their supposed links to the Illuminati. For example, Icke’s long-time antagonist, Richard Warman, was once maligned as a Bronfman “stooge” because he was a member of the Ontario Green Party of Toronto, “one of the global centres of the Illuminati and one of its key bloodlines, the Bronfmans.” According to Icke, Warman worked closely with the Canadian Jewish Congress, which was “founded and funded by the Bronfman family” (Icke, 2001, 410. 411). Not surprisingly, Warman took legal action against Icke, the results of which have gone unreported.
This leaves open other, less palatable explanations for Icke’s current arrangement with the IHC. Is Icke now in the pay of the very forces he now claims to oppose? Has he been co-opted? Or do Icke’s actions prove that he does not believe what he says? Given Icke’s record of publicly opposing the “Illuminati” in its innumerable guises (and disguises), such suggestions may seem outrageous. But through the act of seeking assistance from the IHC, seemingly without regard to its “reptilian” connections, Icke does much to foster such conspiracy theories.
©2007 Will Banyan. Will Banyan is a writer specializing in the political economy of globalization. His article “The Israel Lobby Controversy” appears in Paranoia, issue 44, and his article, “Neo-Con Counter-Conspiracy?” appears in Paranoia, issue 40. His article, “Outflanking the Nation-State” appears on the Paranoia website, and research papers “The Invisible Man of the New World Order: Raymond B. Fosdick” and “The Proud Internationalist: The Globalist Vision of David Rockefeller” appear at: www.martinfrost.ws/htmlfiles/third_section.html. He may be reached atbanyan007@rediffmail.com.
References
Cohen, Bonner, “The Price of Doing Business: Environmentalist Groups Toe the Line,” Foundation Watch (Capital Research Center), July 2006.
Courtney, Kent & Phoebe, America’s Unelected Rulers, Conservative Society of America, 1962.
Gurudas, Treason: The New World Order, Cassandra Press, 1996.
Hoar, William P., Architects of Conspiracy: An Intriguing History, Western Islands, 1984.
Icke, David, It Doesn’t Have To Be Like This: Green Politics Explained, Green Print 1990.
Icke, The Robots’ Rebellion: The Story of the Spiritual Renaissance, Gateway Books, 1994.
Icke, …and the truth will set your free: The most explosive book of the 20^th century, Bridge of Love, 1997.
Icke, The Biggest Secret: The book that will change the world, Bridge of Love, 1999.
Icke, Children of the Matrix: How an interdimensional race has controlled the world for thousands of years, Bridge of Love, 2001.
Icke, Tales from the Time Loop: The most comprehensive expose of the global conspiracy ever written, Bridge of Love, 2003.
Icke, Infinite Love is the Only Truth Everything Else is Illusion: Exposing the dreamworld we believe to be ‘real’, Bridge of Love, 2005.
Icke’s Freedom Foundation: www.ihcenter.org/groups/freedomfoundation.html
International Humanities Center, Project Operations Manual, IHC, PO Box 923, Malibu, CA, 2007.
Jasper, Willam F., “Conspiracy Realities,” The New American, August 23, 2004.
Johnson, Ben “Tides Foundation and Tides Center” (excerpt from 57 Varieties of Radical Causes), 09/04, www.discoverthenetworks.org/.
Marcus, George E., ”The Making of Pious Persons within Contemporary American Notable Families ” Nelson W. Aldrich, Jr., Sociological Perspectives, (Summer, 1989).
Marrs, Jim, Rule By Secrecy, HarperCollins, 2000.
Noah, Timothy, “Pathologies of the Idle Rich – Part 3,” Slate, March 12, 2001.
Randall, Gretchen & Tom, “The Tides Foundation: Liberal Crossroads of Money and Ideas,” Foundation Watch (Capital Research Center), December 2003.
Stang, Alan, The Actor: The True Story of John Foster Dulles, Secretary of State 1953 to 1959, Western Islands, 1968.
Strom, Stephanie, “Rockefellers Starting Service for Would Be Philanthropists,” New York Times, April 29, 2002, p.B3.

Social Sciences and the Destruction of Individuality

Posted by: Traci Rigby in ARTICLES, FEATURED January 10, 2014

by Jon Rappoport
January 9, 2014
www.nomorefakenews.com
You may or not be interested in the sexual practices of Trobriand Islanders. You may or not be interested in what some tribe in the Amazon jungle is doing on a slow Thursday.
But what sociologists and anthropologists have written about such subjects is as much science as you sitting in a park and writing notes on what people are doing in the playground.
One of the founders of sociology, Emile Durkheim (1858-1917), coined the phrase “collective consciousness.” Durkheim insisted there were “inherent” qualities that existed in society apart from individuals. Exposing his own absurd theory, he went so far as to claim suicide was one of those qualities, as if the “phenomenon” were present beyond any individual choice to end life.
He wrote: “Man is the more vulnerable to self-destruction the more he is detached from any collectivity, that is to say, the more he lives as an egoist.”
In other words, according to Burkheim, the individual who rejects the norms of society must be wrapped up in himself in some morally repugnant way. There are no other alternatives.
In his book, The Division of Labour in Society (1893) (wikipedia), Burkheim spun moral conscience in the following fashion: “…Make yourself usefully fulfill a determinate function.” He cited this as a kind of command issued by collective consciousness. This is the presentation of the individual human as machine-cog.
From the mud of sociology’s beginnings, the long sordid history of the academic discipline brings us to something like this. Peter Callero, of the department of sociology, Western Oregon University, has written a book titled: The Myth of Individualism: How Social Forces Shape Our Lives (2013, 2nd Ed):

“Most people today believe that an individual is a person with an independent and distinct identification. This, however, is a myth.”

When Callero writes “identification,” he isn’t talking about ID cards and Social Security numbers. He’s talking about an absence of any uniqueness from person to person. He’s asserting there is no significant distinction between any two people. There aren’t two individuals to begin with. They’re a group.
This downgrading of the individual human spirit is far from accidental. It’s launched as a sustained propaganda campaign, the purpose of which is top-down control.
“The cold truth is that the individualist creed of everybody for himself and the devil take the hindmost is principally responsible for the distress in which Western civilization finds itself — with investment racketeering at one end and labor racketeering at the other. Whatever merits the creed may have had in the days of primitive agriculture and industry, it is not applicable in an age of technology, science, and rationalized economy. Once useful, it has become a danger to society.” (Charles Beard, 1931)
Beard, a celebrated historian, appears to see no difference between individual racketeering and the individual freely choosing and living his own life. For him, society must rely on organization, and the individual takes the leftovers.
“British empiricist philosophy is individualist. And it is of course clear that if the only criterion of true and false which a man accepts is that man’s, then he has no base for social agreement. The question of how man ought to behave is a social question, which always involves several people; and if he accepts no evidence and no judgment except his own, he has no tools with which to frame an answer.” (Jacob Bronowski, Science and Human Values, 1956).
Bronowski is quite sure that hearing other people’s evidence and then keeping one’s own counsel is wrong. One has to accept that evidence on its face? This is sheer idiocy. Individuals are capable of deciding, on their own, what social agreements to enter into.
Even more to the point, Beard and Bronowski were both high-achieving individuals—who then turned around and celebrated the kind of society that would try to flatten and level the individual to an average.
The world has many such experts. They rise high enough and then they preach collectivism. They become social meddlers. They believe they have the tools to plan what kind of world we should live in—since they are not part of that world anymore.
Freed from the obligations with which they want to bind us, they can pontificate and scheme and fantasize about social, economic, and political constructs in which The Group is all.
This is elitism par excellence.
I’ll stick with Orwell:
“It cannot be said too often — at any rate, it is not being said nearly often enough — that collectivism is not inherently democratic, but, on the contrary, gives to a tyrannical minority such powers as the Spanish Inquisitors never dreamt of.” (George Orwell, 1944)
The people who take it upon themselves to impose a planned society on everyone else don’t have much to say about freedom. Why would they? It’s a wild card, and it belongs to the individual, whom they consider merely an obstacle to the so-called progress of the group.
The very basis of sociology and anthropology, with which college students’ heads are filled, is: know the group. These pseudo-disciplines have thrived because elites with real power are doing everything they can to eradicate the concept of the individual.
Why would anyone perpetuate the myth that these two academic subjects are “social sciences?” There is nothing scientific about them. Their practitioners may devise computer models and debate the merits of one generality about cultures vs. another. But otherwise, we’re looking at nothing more than a gateway into planning a world management system.
In which the individual plays no part.
Jon Rappoport