THE DATA KERNEL Part 2A: The Scale Trillion-Dollar Valuations on Extracted Attention

THE DATA KERNEL

Part 2A: The Scale

Trillion-Dollar Valuations on Extracted Attention

---

In 1854, Thomas Handasyd Perkins died as one of the richest men in America. His fortune, built on opium trafficking, was estimated at $1-2 million—equivalent to roughly $50-100 million in 2026 dollars.

With that money, he owned significant portions of Boston real estate, funded Massachusetts General Hospital, established the Perkins School for the Blind, and secured his family's place in American aristocracy for generations.

His fortune was considered enormous. Scandalous, even, to those who knew its source.

Now meet Mark Zuckerberg.

As of January 2026, his net worth is approximately $170 billion.

That's not 1,700 times Perkins' fortune. It's 1,700 to 3,400 times larger, depending on inflation calculations.

Perkins trafficked opium to millions in China over decades.

Zuckerberg extracted attention from billions globally in under two decades.

The product changed. The extraction mechanism scaled. The wealth concentration exploded.

This is Part 2A: The Scale. The documentation of corporate valuations and personal fortunes that make opium wealth look like pocket change.

---

I. THE CORPORATE VALUATIONS: TRILLION-DOLLAR EXTRACTION MACHINES

Jardine Matheson, at the peak of the opium trade, was worth tens of millions of pounds—hundreds of millions in modern currency. It was one of the most valuable firms in the British Empire.

Modern tech companies have valuations that dwarf entire national economies.

The Big Five (Market Capitalizations, January 2026):

Apple: ~$3.0 trillion

• Primary revenue: iPhone sales, App Store (30% commission on all transactions)
• Business model: Hardware gateway to attention extraction ecosystem
• Monopoly position: iOS controls ~60% of US smartphone market, higher-income users

Microsoft: ~$2.8 trillion

• Primary revenue: Cloud services, Office 365, Windows licensing
• Business model: Infrastructure for digital work (extraction via productivity)
• Monopoly position: Windows ~75% of desktop OS, Office near-total market control

Alphabet (Google): ~$1.8 trillion

• Primary revenue: Advertising (90% of revenue from ads)
• Business model: Search monopoly → User data → Targeted advertising
• Monopoly position: Google Search ~92% global market share

Amazon: ~$1.6 trillion

• Primary revenue: E-commerce marketplace, AWS cloud services
• Business model: Retail monopoly + infrastructure control
• Monopoly position: ~40% of US e-commerce, AWS ~32% of cloud market

Meta (Facebook): ~$1.0 trillion

• Primary revenue: Advertising (98% of revenue from ads)
• Business model: Attention extraction → User data → Targeted advertising
• Monopoly position: Facebook/Instagram/WhatsApp = 3.2 billion daily active users across platforms

Combined Market Cap: ~$10.2 trillion

What $10 Trillion Means:

That's larger than:

• The GDP of Japan (~$4.2T, world's 3rd largest economy)
• The GDP of Germany (~$4.1T, world's 4th largest economy)
• The GDP of India (~$3.7T, world's 5th largest economy)
• Japan + Germany combined

Five companies are worth more than the entire economic output of the world's 3rd and 4th largest economies.

For comparison:

• Total value of British opium trade (1830s-1880s, inflation-adjusted): ~$300-500 billion over 50 years
• Total value of Big Five tech companies: ~$10 trillion right now
• Scale multiplier: 20-30x the entire opium trade's total value, concentrated in 5 companies

The Revenue Reality (2025 Annual Revenue):

Where The Money Comes From:

Apple: $391 billion

• iPhone: $200B+ (hardware gateway)
• Services (App Store, iCloud, subscriptions): $85B+
• iPad, Mac, Wearables: ~$106B

Microsoft: $245 billion

• Cloud (Azure): $110B+
• Office/Productivity: $69B+
• Windows, Gaming, Other: $66B+

Alphabet (Google): $328 billion

• Google Advertising: $280B+ (~85% of revenue)
• YouTube Advertising: $31B+
• Google Cloud: $33B+
• Nearly 90% from selling access to your attention

Amazon: $620 billion

• Online Stores: $255B+
• AWS (Cloud): $96B+
• Third-party seller services: $140B+
• Advertising: $47B+ (fastest-growing segment)

Meta (Facebook): $149 billion

• Advertising: $146B+ (~98% of revenue)
• Reality Labs (VR/Metaverse): $1.9B
• Essentially a pure attention-to-advertising conversion machine

Combined Annual Revenue: ~$1.73 trillion

That's $1.73 trillion per year extracted primarily from:

• Your attention (advertising)
• Your data (sold to advertisers)
• Your time (kept on platforms as long as possible)
• Your purchases (Amazon marketplace, App Store commissions)

---

II. THE PERSONAL FORTUNES: WEALTH BEYOND COMPREHENSION

Perkins, Forbes, Delano—the opium barons became wealthy beyond their contemporaries' imagination. Their fortunes funded estates, universities, hospitals, and secured generational wealth.

Tech billionaires have accumulated wealth that makes those fortunes look like rounding errors.

The Tech Billionaires (Net Worth, January 2026):

Elon Musk: ~$250 billion

• Source: Tesla (38% ownership), SpaceX (42% ownership), X/Twitter
• Wealth mechanism: Electric vehicles, space technology, acquired social platform
• Extraction model: Government subsidies, carbon credits, attention via Twitter

Jeff Bezos: ~$190 billion

• Source: Amazon (9% ownership, down from 16% at founding)
• Wealth mechanism: E-commerce monopoly, AWS cloud dominance
• Extraction model: Marketplace fees, seller data, cloud infrastructure lock-in

Mark Zuckerberg: ~$170 billion

• Source: Meta/Facebook (13% ownership, 58% voting control)
• Wealth mechanism: Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp attention extraction
• Extraction model: User attention → Advertising revenue
• Built entirely on the addiction mechanisms we documented in Part 1

Larry Ellison: ~$155 billion

• Source: Oracle (40%+ ownership)
• Wealth mechanism: Database software, cloud infrastructure
• Extraction model: Enterprise software lock-in, data infrastructure control

Bill Gates: ~$130 billion

• Source: Microsoft (sold most shares, diversified investments)
• Wealth mechanism: Windows/Office monopoly (historical), now diversified
• Extraction model: Operating system monopoly, productivity software lock-in
• Note: Now in Stage 4 (philanthropic laundering) via Gates Foundation

Larry Page: ~$125 billion

• Source: Alphabet/Google (~6% ownership)
• Wealth mechanism: Google search monopoly
• Extraction model: Search → Data → Advertising

Sergey Brin: ~$120 billion

• Source: Alphabet/Google (~6% ownership)
• Wealth mechanism: Google search monopoly (co-founder with Page)
• Extraction model: Same as Page

Steve Ballmer: ~$120 billion

• Source: Microsoft (sold shares, 4% ownership)
• Wealth mechanism: Microsoft CEO tenure (2000-2014)
• Extraction model: Software monopoly

Combined Wealth (Top 8 Tech Billionaires): ~$1.26 trillion

The Scale of Personal Wealth:

$170 billion (Zuckerberg) means:

• If you spent $1 million per day, it would take 465 years to spend
• You could buy every single-family home in San Francisco (~200,000 homes at ~$1.5M each) and still have $140 billion left
• You could fund the entire annual budget of NASA (~$25B) for 6.8 years
• You could give every person on Earth $21.25

This isn't just "wealthy." This is wealth beyond the scale of human comprehension.

The Opium Comparison (Inflation-Adjusted):

Opium Baron	Estimated Peak Wealth (Modern $)	Tech Billionaire	Current Wealth	Multiplier
Thomas H. Perkins	$50-100 million	Mark Zuckerberg	$170 billion	1,700-3,400x
John Murray Forbes	$100-200 million	Jeff Bezos	$190 billion	950-1,900x
Warren Delano Jr.	$30-60 million	Bill Gates	$130 billion	2,170-4,330x
William Jardine	$200-300 million	Larry Page/Sergey Brin	$245 billion (combined)	815-1,225x

Average multiplier: 1,000-2,500x

Tech billionaires are roughly 1,000 to 2,500 times wealthier than opium barons were (adjusted for inflation).

The extraction mechanism scaled. The wealth concentration exploded.

---

III. THE WEALTH CONCENTRATION: WORSE THAN THE GILDED AGE

The opium trade concentrated enormous wealth in the hands of a few dozen trading families. This created the "robber barons" of the 19th century and sparked wealth inequality concerns.

Tech wealth concentration makes the Gilded Age look egalitarian.

The Numbers:

Wealth Inequality Metrics (2026):

Top 10 Tech Billionaires:

• Combined wealth: ~$1.4 trillion
• That's more than the bottom 50% of Americans combined (~$3.7T for 165M people)
• 10 people have 38% as much wealth as 165 million people

Wealth Growth Rate:

• Median US household wealth growth (2010-2024): ~35%
• Tech billionaire wealth growth (same period): ~800-1200%
• Gap widening at unprecedented rate

Income from Wealth:

• $170B at 3% return = $5.1B/year passive income
• That's $13.9 million PER DAY
• Without working, Zuckerberg makes more per day than most people earn in a lifetime

Gilded Age vs. Tech Age:

Metric	Gilded Age (1890)	Tech Age (2026)
Top 1% Wealth Share	~45% of total wealth	~35% of total wealth
Top 0.1% Wealth Share	~25% of total wealth	~20% of total wealth
But: Individual Fortunes	Rockefeller: ~$400B (inflation-adj, peak)	Musk: ~$250B (current)
Speed of Accumulation	Rockefeller: 40+ years to peak wealth	Zuckerberg: 15 years to $100B+
Number of Ultra-Wealthy	~10 individuals with $100M+ (inflation-adj)	~3,000 individuals with $100M+

The difference: Gilded Age had higher overall inequality, but Tech Age has faster wealth creation and more ultra-wealthy individuals.

Both are extraction economies. Tech extraction just scales better.

The Global Context:

Tech Billionaire Wealth vs. National Economies:

Elon Musk ($250B) has more wealth than:

• GDP of Portugal ($268B) - 10.3 million people
• GDP of New Zealand ($252B) - 5.1 million people
• GDP of Vietnam ($430B) - but Musk alone is 58% of Vietnam's entire economy

Top 10 Tech Billionaires ($1.4T) have more wealth than:

• GDP of Spain ($1.58T) - 47 million people
• GDP of South Korea ($1.71T) - 51 million people
• Combined wealth of 10 people ≈ economic output of 50 million people

This is unprecedented wealth concentration in human history.

---

IV. WHAT WE'VE JUST SEEN

This is Part 2A: The corporate valuations and personal fortunes that dwarf opium wealth.

The Scale Documented (Part 2A):

• ✅ Corporate valuations: Big Five = $10.2 trillion (20-30x entire opium trade)
• ✅ Annual revenue: $1.73 trillion/year extracted from users
• ✅ Personal fortunes: Top 8 = $1.26 trillion (1,000-2,500x opium barons)
• ✅ Wealth concentration: 10 people = 38% of bottom 50% of Americans
• ✅ Speed of accumulation: Zuckerberg reached $100B+ in 15 years
• ✅ Comparison: Tech extraction 1,000-3,500x larger than opium

What Comes Next:

We've seen the corporate valuations and personal fortunes. But how does this wealth perpetuate itself?

Part 2B: The Scale (Extraction Economics)

Next, we'll document:

• How extraction becomes revenue (the business model exposed)
• The multiplier effects (network effects, data advantages, capital deployment)
• Why monopolies become permanent (the competitive moats)
• The complete scale comparison (opium vs. attention, all metrics)

The wealth is staggering. The mechanism that creates it is even more important.

---

← Part 1: The Extraction | Part 2B: The Scale (Economics) →