‘Have you any common sense?’ – Putin Crushes BBC Journalist’s Stupid Questions

October 22, 2015 By Stuart Hooper 

21st Century Wire says…

Is common sense severely lacking in mainstream Western journalism?

Russia’s President Putin found himself having to ask BBC journalist John Simpson if he has any common sense at all, as he pushed the establishment line that Russia is an aggressor in the world.

Putin contends that Russia is “standing up for its national interests“, and is visibly frustrated by the frankly ignorant questions that Simpson poses. Putin asks, “Why are you threatening us“, and “what business have they got there“, in reference to U.S. military bases throughout Europe.

He also notes that Russia’s annual military budget is a mere $50-78 billion, while the U.S. equivalent is around $575 billion before asking:

“And you’re telling me I’m the aggressor here? Have you any common sense at all?“

Despite this fact Russia still manages to trump NATO with the world’s best air defence system that it has now deployed in Syria, so what exactly is the Western military industrial complex doing with all that money?

Russia has massively embarrassed the West with its recent actions in Syria, refusing to hold back in its highly successful campaign against ISIS, so this move by the BBC joins other recent attempts to paint Russia as an enemy.

The following interview has been viewed, in total, over one million times, which is testament to how powerfully it really is:

Putin Crushes BBC Smartass INCLUDING BBC propagandist's question

BUSTED: Videos of Virginia Reporter Shooting Hoax Were Separate Takes!

TOPICS:conspiraciesfalse flagsVirginia shooting hoax

September 3, 2015

By Joe Wright
The establishment media has gone quiet on the Virginia shooting since evidence that it was a hoax has gone viral.
Yet, their silence hasn’t stopped the conspiracy research community from finding even more damning evidence that it was indeed an elaborate hoax.  If this doesn’t prove that the Virginian Shooting was a hoax than nothing will.
YouTube researcher Peekay22 found a glaring mistake in the Virginia shooting production. He proves that each camera angle shows the actors doing different gestures during the precise moment the gun was fired.
They are not merely two distinct camera angles. Rather, they are two separate instances altogether, indicating that the production team of this staged shooting event took several takes to get the reaction they wanted.
It’s such a sloppy production mistake that it almost seems deliberate.

Virginia Shooting - Possibly 2 Takes? You Decide

Nobody Died At Sandy Hook 

by James Tracy • Home • Tags: academe, alternative media, false flag terror, gun control, public opinion, Sandy Hook Elementary

It wasn’t a School Massacre. It was a FEMA Drill.

A new volume edited by Prof. Jim Fetzer and Mike Palecek

Proof it was a drill was right before our eyes:
* the sign, “Everyone must check in!”
* boxes of bottled water & pizza cartons
* Port-a-Potties present from scratch
* many wearing name tags on lanyards
* parents bringing children to the scene

Proof it wasn’t a massacre was also there:
* no surge of EMTs in to the building
* no Med-Evac helicopter was called
* no string of ambulances to the school
* no evacuation of 469 other students
* no bodies placed on the triage tarps

Among the best students and scholars of Sandy Hook have contributed to this collection:

Vivian Lee, Ph.D. Sterling Harwood, J.D., Ph.D. Dr. Eowyn, Ph.D. Nick Kollerstrom, Ph.D. Dennis Cimino James F. Tracy, Ph.D. Kelley Watt Allan William Powell Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.

And featuring Sofia Smallstorm, Paul Preston and Wolfgang Halbig.

The essays have been edited by Jim Fetzer, Ph.D., a former Marine Corps officer and Distinguished McKnight Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, and by Mike Palecek, who has committed his life to the search for truth and justice. They prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax to promote the Obama/Holder gun-control agenda. If you want to know what happened, who was responsible and how it was done, you want to read this book.
We have proof of photo fakery; proof of furnishing the Lanza home to serve as a prop; proof of refurbishing the school to serve as the stage. We even have the FEMA manual for the Sandy Hook event.

“All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns; that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party.” – Mao Tse Tung

NYC to let the UN run its police force

by J. D. Heyes

(NaturalNews) American tradition, values and mores continue to erode thanks to constant pressure by the political left to destroy a culture they see as illegitimate and dangerous to the globe — despite our nation's appeal to millions around the world and the opportunities we create for ourselves and for others.
Now, the liberals who run New York City are even prepared to cede at least some policing power to "a new global, terror-busting network to try to combat homegrown extremism," according to a September 29 press statement, The New American reports.

In an announcement made at the United Nations, avowed socialist Mayor Bill DeBlasio declared New York City's intent to join the UN and the United States Department of Justice in their bid to combat "all forms of violent extremism, whether it's based in religious, or racial, or nationalistic or ideological intolerance."

With this, de Blasio has effectively ruled that American patriotism is an "intolerance" he won't tolerate. Save for 9/11, however, when was the last time we've seen a major act of "extremism" in New York City (that hasn't come from the mayor himself), anyway?

As The New American further reported, the Obama Justice Department is claiming that this new law enforcement partnership program — dubbed "Strong Cities" — is really aimed at inspiring "action on a global scale."

Guns, ammunition and right-wing extremists

"The Strong Cities Network will serve as a vital tool to strengthen capacity-building and improve collaboration," said Attorney General Loretta Lynch. "As we continue to counter a range of domestic and global terror threats, this innovative platform will enable cities to learn from one another, to develop best practices and to build social cohesion and community resilience here at home and around the world."

Under this initiative, cities around the world would be happily "integrating" their efforts to "safeguard" citizens.

The globalist approach to civilian law enforcement was also praised recently by the mayor of Oslo, Norway.

"To counter violent extremism, we need determined action at all levels of governance," said Governing Mayor Stian Berger Rosland. "To succeed, we must coordinate our efforts and cooperate across borders. The Strong Cities Network will enable cities across the globe to pool our resources, knowledge and best practices together and thus leave us standing stronger in the fight against one of the greatest threats to modern society."

Speaking at the launch of the Strong Cities program, Lynch said it would be "run by the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD)," a think tank based in Europe. She also considers conservatives the "enemy," so to speak. As reported by The New American:

"Americans of a constitutionalist bent, knowing how the Department of Homeland Security looks at patriots, might be interested to read one of the ISD's primary points of emphasis.

From the group's 2014 report entitled Old Threat, New Approach: Tackling the Far Right Across Europe: 'The project will also develop an online tool to provide practical training for practitioners, and will seed a long-term network of experts and practitioners working to counter far-right extremism.' "

NYC, the first globalist partner

What is even more disturbing — but wholly predictable — is that the ISD, as a Leftist instrument, made sure to associate "far-right extremism" with firearms. Now that the Justice Department and the European think tank have been given significant control over setting law enforcement policies in the nation's largest city, gun owners might want to think about voting with their feet before certain gun control policies are enforced after this ISD observation:

"Worryingly, Europol confirms that many members of the extreme right-wing scene have been found in possession of a significant amount of firearms, ammunition."

Said "extremists" even had the temerity to engage in "target practice." Gads! We wouldn't want anyone who owns a gun to actually know how to use it — right?

The Left is coming for our freedom, our heritage, our culture and our values, America. And now, they've even signed up their first globalist partner to help close the deal.

Sources:

TheNewAmerican.com

Justice.gov

WashingtonTimes.com

Senior healthcare costs skyrocket to $245,000 per year despite Obama's empty promises

by L.J. Devon, Staff Writer http://www.naturalnews.com/051697_Obamacare_senior_citizens_healthcare_costs.html

(NaturalNews) The faults will remain in any system, even after the government redistributes who pays for those faults. In a way, when the government redistributes the costs of a broken system, their programs only legitimize the core faults within that system.
For example, if the government determines that pharmaceutical companies are greedy and should pay higher taxes, this legislation only redistributes the greed money to policy makers, pushing the companies to operate more greedily to keep up with the demand. The companies then find out it is easier to infiltrate the government with their influence so they can steer policies that help them monopolize.

The American medical system is in financial shambles. The costs continue to go up even after the Affordable Care Act intervened to redistribute costs. President Obama promised lower healthcare costs after passing the Affordable Care Act, but the law only mandates more health insurance payment plans that don't fix the fundamental problems within the medical system. The mandated health insurance plans only legitimize an industry that encourages financial waste, over-medication and over-diagnosis.

Healthcare costs jump 11 percent between 2014 and 2015

The facts make it clear that the promises of the Affordable Care Act are backfiring. A new report from Bloomberg shows that senior healthcare costs are skyrocketing, years after the law was passed. The average 65-year-old couple preparing to retire in 2015 is looking at healthcare costs of $245,000 per year, and this number is projected to climb. This average, which has jumped 11 percent from 2014, shows how domineering and enslaving the medical system has become. Government intervention through the years, which has legitimized the faults in the medical system, has only driven up costs.

The promises of cost-saving government programs are all theater to cover up the fundamental problems within the system. Health insurance plans are a part of the problem. Mandating these plans on the population, like the Affordable Care Act did, only perpetuates the problems. Health insurance plans are expected to cover costs, so many medical professionals naturally prescribe more pills and schedule more tests to stay on the safe side. There's no incentive for true cost-effective, nutrition-based prevention because costly interventions will be covered by health insurance plans.

A shift in focus must occur for healthcare costs to drop for everyone in the United States. The individual must be put in charge of his or her healthcare and the incentives must reward preventive lifestyle measures, not lazy doctor visits that bill health insurance plans for quick-fix pharmaceuticals that cause more problems down the road.

Prescription drugs are now costing seniors an average of $56,350 per year

Broken down per category, the costs of prescription drugs make up 23 percent of the $245,000 figure, which means they cost the average senior $56,350 per year. This ridiculous cost to manage disease comes after seniors have been gutted through the "health insurance" industries. The amount of money spent per senior on deductibles and cost-sharing with an insurer is 43 percent of the $245,000 total, which equates to a whopping $105,350 per year. The other 34 percent of the total goes to fund the Medicare Part B and D premiums.

The saddest part about these costs and this system is that there is no focus on actual health. It is all a giant disease management system that pushes pharmacology before nutrition. The costs are also climbing because of life expectancy calculations. Fidelity Investments raised life expediencies to determine the cost of healthcare for 2015. A 65-year-old man is now projected to live until age 85, up from 82 a year before. A 65-year-old woman is expected to reach age 87, up from age 85 in 2014.

People are expected to live longer in terms of years, but people across the board are losing their quality of life in the process. This is mainly because of the fundamental problems that exist in the medical system.

What if the healthcare system emphasized the importance of clean water and encouraged patients to drink adequate amounts of water that is filtered and free of heavy metals, fluoride, pesticides, and other toxins?

What if doctor visits held patients accountable for getting daily Vitamin D from the sun to support immune system health? What if organic whole food vitamins were prescribed in place of synthetic quick-fix pills?

What if the healthcare system educated people on the environmental toxins in the home, including pesticides, artificial petroleum-derived fragrances, bisphenols and microwavable plastics that leech hormone-disrupting chemicals into the body?

What if hospitals led by example by tending to large organic gardens that prove exactly where health really comes from?

There are a million ways the healthcare system can change to reward healthy lifestyle decisions. Why is the government legitimizing the very problems within the broken American healthcare system? Is it all deliberate or out of ignorance?

Sources for this article include:
ZeroHedge.com