The most hilarious gun control memes: How gun control advocates protect their yards with idiotic signs; why bombs are clocks, but Pop-Tarts are guns... and more

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews http://www.naturalnews.com/051452_gun_control_gun-free_zones_doublespeak.html

(NaturalNews) How do gun control advocates protect their yards? By surgically removing the teeth of their dogs and posting "Teeth-Free Zone" signs in their yards.
Or at least that's the proposition of a hilarious new infographic meme from Stupid.news (see below).

I've gathered a few of the most notable infographic memes on the topic of gun control. Why bother with this task? Because behind every mass shooting is a media LIE. Take this most recent Oregon shooting as an example. The mainstream media is reporting the shooter (Christopher Mercer) as a white guy who was a Republican and a white supremacist.

It's all a media lie. In reality, Mercer was mixed-race with an African-American mother (CNN photoshopped his picture to make him look white), and he was a vocal supporter of the Irish Republican Army militant group, not the Republican party of the USA. Mercer was an immigrant from the UK and he was also taking prescription medications while suffering from severe depression. You don't hear any of that in the P.C. mainstream media, do ya?

Just like the hilarious distortion of "facts" by the mainstream media, the arguments of anti-gun people are so ludicrous you just have to laugh at them. So here's the first hilarious gun control meme which takes aim at the idiotic concept of "Gun Free Zones":

The Politically Correct Guide to Leftist Doublespeak

From Twisted.news, check out the "Politically Correct Guide to Leftist Doublespeak," created as a hilarious commentary on the left's wildly shifting definitions of what things really are.

Somehow, a suitcase bomb-looking device is called a "clock," but when a Pop-Tart is shaped into a crude outline of a pistol, that's called a "gun" and gets a child suspended from school.

Note to P.C. bros and other P.C. dweebs: please demonstrate your P.C. idiocy by posting the most insanely rude, aggressive and bullying comments possible after viewing this satire meme, thereby demonstrating your total intolerance for satire and free speech. HINT: This is why comedians don't tour colleges anymore, because P.C. idiocy has turned college students into intolerant, humorless twits:

Now for a more serious tone... he's what happens when governments take the guns away from the citizens

And finally, in the category of human tragedy and genocide, here's an historical photo that's accurately annotated with the truth about gun control.

When governments take guns away from the citizens, it's usually not very long before those citizens are lined up over a ditch and executed by government officers who are "just following orders" (and using guns to commit genocide).



Right now, Obama and the gun control idiots (Michael Moore and Julianne Moore, to name two Moores) can't wait to recreate the above scene in America. In their minds, the people in the ditches should be Republicans, while the government agents committing the genocide should be obedient democrats carrying out Obama's executive orders "for the good of society."

Yep, there's nothing new under the sun, folks. Gun control and genocide has already been tried, and it didn't turn out too well for the Jews...

GUN CONTROL WORKS IN THE UK

Posted by George Freund on October 12, 2015          ~ yea fuck~in right ...Huh ! ... go head, give UP yer boom~stick ?

Pensioner has his face sewn back together 'from ear to ear' after being beaten by burglars in his own home

• Tommy Ward fighting for his life after being savagely beaten during raid
• He suffered a fractured skull, broken ribs, jaw and finger and a head injury
• 80-year-old was attacked during raid at home in which £30,000 was stolen

LINK:



77 year old widow beaten with iron bar

• Geraldine Winner was hit on the head with an iron bar during the burglary 
• She was forced to hand over jewellery gifted to her by her late husband
• The film director's widow was made to endure three hour ordeal as the unidentified burglars rifled through her possessions

LINK:

These people will never be poster children for the liberal left gun control agenda. President Obama will shed no tears, but this is the reality of being a crime victim. The British took the arms from the people and they made resisting intruders a crime. Mind control must work very well then that we accept the result.In the next case if guns were banned, how did the cop killer get the gun? Those nasty handguns don't exist in private hands. The fallacy of gun control should be obvious but the hue and cry is absent. This is how gun control works in the UK. It works the same everywhere. The fairy tale society promised does not and cannot exist. After the INQUISITION the right to bear arms was put in the British Bill of Rights. Some lessons have to be learned more than once.

Unarmed policeman shot dead by bailed IRA suspect in murder-suicide

• Tony Golden was shot dead by IRA suspect Adrian Crevan Mackin Sunday
• Mackin then killed himself as well after killing in Omeath, Co Louth
• Garda Golden, a father of three, was responding to a domestic row
• Concerns were for Mackin's girlfriend Siobhan Phillips, whom he shot too

LINK:

The Funding of the 2016 US Presidential Election: America’s 158 Billionaire “Families”   ~ hehe "U" still 'think' yer 'vote' counts , Huh ?only an dummycock  OR republipube  ..would 'think' ..that !    

By Nicholas Confessore, Sarah Cohen, and Karen Yourish

Global Research, October 12, 2015

Paul Craig Roberts 10 October 2015

Region: USA

In-depth Report: U.S. Elections

They are overwhelmingly white, rich, older and male, in a nation that is being remade by the young, by women, and by black and brown voters. Across a sprawling country, they reside in an archipelago of wealth, exclusive neighborhoods dotting a handful of cities and towns. And in an economy that has minted billionaires in a dizzying array of industries, most made their fortunes in just two: finance and energy.
Now they are deploying their vast wealth in the political arena, providing almost half of all the seed money raised to support Democratic and Republican presidential candidates. Just 158 families, along with companies they own or control, contributed $176 million in the first phase of the campaign, a New York Times investigation found. Not since before Watergate have so few people and businesses provided so much early money in a campaign, most of it through channels legalized by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision five years ago.
These donors’ fortunes reflect the shifting composition of the country’s economic elite. Relatively few work in the traditional ranks of corporate America, or hail from dynasties of inherited wealth. Most built their own businesses, parlaying talent and an appetite for risk into huge wealth: They founded hedge funds in New York, bought up undervalued oil leases in Texas, made blockbusters in Hollywood. More than a dozen of the elite donors were born outside the United States, immigrating from countries like Cuba, the old Soviet Union, Pakistan, India and Israel.
But regardless of industry, the families investing the most in presidential politics overwhelmingly lean right, contributing tens of millions of dollars to support Republican candidates who have pledged to pare regulations; cut taxes on income, capital gains and inheritances; and shrink entitlement programs. While such measures would help protect their own wealth, the donors describe their embrace of them more broadly, as the surest means of promoting economic growth and preserving a system that would allow others to prosper, too.
Mostly Backing Republicans

 

Republicans

138

Democrats

20

“It’s a lot of families around the country who are self-made who feel like over-regulation puts these burdens on smaller companies,” said Doug Deason, a Dallas investor whose family put $5 million behind Gov. Rick Perry of Texas and now, after Mr. Perry’s exit, is being courted by many of the remaining candidates. “They’ve done well. They want to see other people do well.”
In marshaling their financial resources chiefly behind Republican candidates, the donors are also serving as a kind of financial check on demographic forces that have been nudging the electorate toward support for the Democratic Party and its economic policies. Two-thirds of Americans support higher taxes on those earning $1 million or more a year, according to a June New York Times/CBS News poll, while six in 10 favor more government intervention to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor. According to the Pew Research Center, nearly seven in 10 favor preserving Social Security and Medicare benefits as they are.
Republican candidates have struggled to improve their standing with Hispanic voters, women and African-Americans. But as the campaign unfolds, Republicans are far outpacing Democrats in exploiting the world of “super PACs,” which, unlike candidates’ own campaigns, can raise unlimited sums from any donor, and which have so far amassed the bulk of the money in the election.
The 158 families each contributed $250,000 or more in the campaign through June 30, according to the most recent available Federal Election Commission filings and other data, while an additional 200 families gave more than $100,000. Together, the two groups contributed well over half the money in the presidential election — the vast majority of it supporting Republicans.
“The campaign finance system is now a countervailing force to the way the actual voters of the country are evolving and the policies they want,” said Ruy Teixeira, a political and demographic expert at the left-leaning Center for American Progress.
Like most of the ultrawealthy, the new donor elite is deeply private. Very few of those contacted were willing to speak about their contributions or their political views. Many donations were made from business addresses or post office boxes, or wound through limited liability corporations or trusts, exploiting the new avenues opened up by Citizens United, which gave corporate entities far more leeway to spend money on behalf of candidates. Some contributors, for reasons of privacy or tax planning, are not listed as the owners of the homes where they live, further obscuring the family and social ties that bind them.
But interviews and a review of hundreds of public documents — voter registrations, business records, F.E.C. data and more — reveal a class apart, distant from much of America while geographically, socially and economically intermingling among themselves. Nearly all the neighborhoods where they live would fit within the city limits of New Orleans. But minorities make up less than one-fifth of those neighborhoods’ collective population, and virtually no one is black. Their residents make four and a half times the salary of the average American, and are twice as likely to be college educated.
Most of the families are clustered around just nine cities. Many are neighbors, living near one another in neighborhoods like Bel Air and Brentwood in Los Angeles; River Oaks, a Houston community popular with energy executives; or Indian Creek Village, a private island near Miami that has a private security force and just 35 homes lining an 18-hole golf course.
Sometimes, across party lines, they are patrons of the same symphonies, art museums or at-risk youth programs. They are business partners, in-laws and, on occasion, even poker buddies.

Copyright © Nicholas Confessore, Sarah Cohen, and Karen Yourish, Paul Craig Roberts, 2015