Wednesday, October 9, 2013

Obama Denies Mother of Fallen US Soldier Death Benefits

how long ,America!     ..are We The People gonna ALLOW  this trailer park fucking trash ...in the People's House ... no strike that ..the shit that is under the Trailer Park!  to debase this Country !!!    how fucking long America ?        this shit you's fucked in the head nit~wit freaking dummycocks... IS there  an lower form of life  ..than the crap you's vote for ???       is there ANY good People left in this 3rd rate nazi banana repub~ass~lick trailer park :o                          

Obama Denies Mother of Fallen US Soldier Death Benefits

truther October 9, 2013
Suzanne Hamner
Does anyone remember the dance game, the Limbo? It was a contest to see how low you could go under a pole, without falling, that steadily kept lowering each round. You could liken this game to the one Obama is playing with the American public. So, just how low can Obama go? Well, it seems pretty low. According to Today.com, “the shutdown of the federal government is now affecting some families when they are most vulnerable, denying them a $100,000 benefit to help with funeral expenses of loved ones killed while serving the country.”
Obama Denies Mother of Fallen US Soldier Death Benefits
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
If my grandmother were alive, she would say that was lower than a snake’s belly slithering across a hardwood floor.
Today.com reported:
The families of five U.S. service members who died over the weekend in Afghanistan have been notified that they won’t be receiving the “death gratuity” normally wired to relatives within 36 hours. The benefit is intended to help cover funeral costs and help with immediate living expenses until survivor benefits typically begin.

The money also helps cover costs to fly families to Dover Air Force Base in Delaware to witness the return of their loved ones in flag-draped coffins.

“The government is hurting the wrong people,” said Shannon Collins, who lost her son over the weekend in Afghanistan.

“Families shouldn’t have to worry about how they’re going to bury their child,” she told NBC News.

“Families shouldn’t have to worry about how they’re going to feed their family if they don’t go to work this week.”

Shannon Collins lost her son, 19 year old Marine Lance Corporal Jeremiah M. Collins, Jr., on Saturday when he was supporting combat operation in Afghanistan. Collins was one of five service members killed in Afghanistan over the weekend, “including four troop members who died Sunday in an IED attack.” Ms. Collins is unsure when her son’s body will be returned to the family for burial. Her son’s remains are at Dover.
Gayle Tzemach Lemmon of the Council on Foreign Relations said, “Washington may be shutdown, but it’s still asking people to go to war. When people realize they can serve and fight for their country, but that their family will get an IOU until the shutdown is over, I think they’re just shocked.”
While Collins has a job and supervisors who will allow her to take paid time off to attend to the care of her son’s return, others may not be as fortunate meaning the “death gratuity may be critical to their survival and sense of closure.”
“While that benefit may not be urgent for me, it’s urgent for somebody. There’s somebody who needs to fly their family home. There’s somebody who needs to have expenses covered, or be able to take off work to handle the affairs of their loved one,” Ms. Collins told Today.com. “And to know that the government shutting down will delay their ability to handle their business, some people just won’t be able to do it.”
Ms. Collins indicated she had the money to address her son’s return but could use help with the funeral expenses as she did not necessarily have the $10,000 to bury him. She is working with the funeral home to make arrangements but wonders if she’ll be on a payment plan the rest of her life.
While a law was passed last week to address the continuing payment of civilian military members during the shutdown, no provision was made to address the payout of the death benefit to families of soldiers who died during service to their country. According to Today.com, “Republican aides told NBC news they are currently drafting legislation to address the issue, and that it could be considered as early as Wednesday.”
One can bet the lamestream media will lay this at the feet of the Republicans while discounting the childish temper tantrum being displayed by Obama, Harry Reid and other Democrat cronies. Was it not the Republican House that passed a piece of legislation to fund the entire government, except Obamacare? Yes, I believe it was. Who rejected that? Why I do declare it was Harry Reid and Obama.
Was it not also the Republican House who passed a piece of legislation that funded the entire government with a stipulation to delay the individual mandate on Obamacare for one year? Again, the answer is yes. Who shot that in the foot? Again, Harry Reid and Obama.
Republicans passed funding for the NIH so children with cancer could get treatments. Harry Reid would not allow that to go through saying, “Why would I do that?” He went on to cite the thousands that were out of work in his home state of Nevada because of the shutdown.
Obama stated he would not even negotiate with Republicans but yet could call the Iranian President to negotiate on the nuclear capability of the Islamic country, could negotiate with Russian President Vladimir Putin on the Syria’s chemical weapons and negotiate providing arms to Islamic terrorist groups in Syria who are known enemies to the US.
This same Obama has spent money to shutdown open air memorials, throw individuals out of their homes on federal land due to park closures, and prevent Americans from seeing Mt. Rushmore by having cones placed alongside the road to prevent cars from stopping. Obama will shutdown the WWII open air memorial to the distinguished veterans who fought in that war to maintain our freedoms but will allow it to be open for an illegal immigrant rally. And to top it all off, Obama even ordered the cemetery in France closed where many American soldiers who stormed the beaches during WWII are laid to rest. I’ll just shake my head and do the face-palm maneuver on this.
You won’t hear the lamestream enemedia reporting these incidents that show Obama as an incorrigible child throwing a tantrum because he didn’t get his way. Nor will you see the same enemedia portraying Harry Reid as a sadistic child killer for denying NIH funding for children suffering from cancer to receive their treatment. That doesn’t play into their little liberal agenda. Everything has to be the Republican’s fault for not going against the American people who do not want Obamacare. In other words, the lamestream enemedia would rather help install a dictator than engage in responsible journalism by reporting the truth or even both sides of the issue.
My grandmother never put up with childish tantrums. Her response was to get the leather razor strap and show it: that usually stopped the tantrums. If it didn’t, all it took was one spanking with that 3 inch strap to set one right again. My grandfather had quite a different approach, but one that was equally effective. His deal was to take one to the spring. Trust me, you never wanted to have to go to the spring – my dad can attest to that fact.
So, I say to all Republicans, it’s time to take Obama and Reid to the spring!

Soon, Drones May Be Able to Make Lethal Decisions on Their Own

Source: Natl Journal
Scientists, engineers and policymakers are all figuring out ways drones can be used better and more smartly, more precise and less damaging to civilians, with longer range and better staying power. One method under development is by increasing autonomy on the drone itself.
Eventually, drones may have the technical ability to make even lethal decisions autonomously: to respond to a programmed set of inputs, select a target and fire their weapons without a human reviewing or checking the result. Yet the idea of the U.S. military deploying a lethal autonomous robot, or LAR, is sparking controversy. Though autonomy might address some of the current downsides of how drones are used, they introduce new downsides policymakers are only just learning to grapple with.
The basic conceit behind a LAR is that it can outperform and outthink a human operator. “If a drone’s system is sophisticated enough, it could be less emotional, more selective and able to provide force in a way that achieves a tactical objective with the least harm,” said Purdue University Professor Samuel Liles. “A lethal autonomous robot can aim better, target better, select better, and in general be a better asset with the linked ISR [intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance] packages it can run.”
Though the pace for drone strikes has slowed down — only 21 have struck Pakistan in 2013, versus 122 in 2010 according to the New America Foundation — unmanned vehicles remain a staple of the American counterinsurgency toolkit. But drones have built-in vulnerabilities that military planners still have not yet grappled with. Last year, for example, an aerospace engineer told the House Homeland Security Committee that with some inexpensive equipment he could hack into a drone and hijack it to perform some rogue purpose.
Drones have been hackable for years. In 2009, defense officials told reporters that Iranian-backed militias used $26 of off-the-shelf software to intercept the video feeds of drones flying over Iraq. And in 2011, it was reported that a virus had infected some drone control systems at Creech Air Force Base in Nevada, leading to security concerns about the security of unmanned aircraft.
It may be that the only way to make a drone truly secure is to allow it to make its own decisions without a human controller: if it receives no outside commands, then it cannot be hacked (at least as easily). And that’s where LARs, might be the most attractive.
Though they do not yet exist, and are not possible with current technology, LARs are the subject of fierce debate in academia, the military and policy circles. Still, many treat their development as inevitability. But how practical would LARs be on the battlefield?
Heather Roff, a visiting professor at the University of Denver, said many conflicts, such as the civil war in Syria, are too complex for LARs. “It’s one thing to use them in a conventional conflict,” where large militaries fight away from cities, “but we tend to fight asymmetric battles. And interventions are only military campaigns — the civilian effects matter.”
Roff says that because LARs are not sophisticated enough to meaningfully distinguish between civilians and militants in a complex, urban environment, they probably would not be effective at achieving a constructive military end– if only because of how a civilian population would likely react to self-governing machines firing weapons at their city. “The idea that you could solve that crisis with a robotic weapon is naïve and dangerous,” she said.
Any autonomous weapons system is unlikely to be used by the military, except in extraordinary circumstances, argued Will McCants, a fellow at the Brookings Saban Center and director of its project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World. “You could imagine a scenario,” he says, “in which LAR planes hunted surface-to-air missiles as part of a campaign to destroy Syria’s air defenses.” It would remove the risk to U.S. pilots while exclusively targeting war equipment that has no civilian purpose.
But such a campaign is unlikely to ever happen. “Ultimately, the national security staff,” he said, referring to personnel that make up the officials and advisers of the National Security Council, “does not want to give up control of the conflict.” The politics of the decision to deploy any kind of autonomous weaponry matters as much as the capability of the technology itself. “With an autonomous system, the consequences of failure are worse in the public’s mind. There’s something about human error that makes people more comfortable with collateral damage if a person does it,” McCants said.
That’s not to say anyone is truly comfortable with collateral damage. “They’d rather own these kinds of decisions themselves and be able to chalk it up to human error,” McCants said. Political issues aside, B.J. Strawser, assistant professor at the Naval Postgraduate School, says that LARs simply could not be used effectively in a place like Syria. “You’d need exceedingly careful and restrictive ROEs [rules of engagement], and I worry that anyone could carry that out effective, autonomous weapon or not,” he said.
“I don’t think any actor, human or not, is capable of carrying out the refined, precise ROEs that would enable an armed intervention to be helpful in Syria.”

15 Year Old Student Commits Suicide One Week After Arrest For Streaking During Football Game

from the the-law-is-sometimes-wielded-by-the-most-frightening-bullies dept

We've seen the terrible results of various anti-bullying laws, most of them written in haste and named after the victim. The tragedies are real. The resulting laws are a mess. We've seen it with "Grace's Law," Maryland's anti-bullying law written after a teen was (as it is often stated) bullied into committing suicide by online aggressors. Thanks to the overreaction, Maryland now has a direct line to Facebook to escalate takedown actions aimed at posts deemed to be "without societal value" by school administrators.

What happens when a teen is "bullied to death" by school administrators?
Christian Adamek, 15, hanged himself Wednesday and died this morning from his injuries, Madison County Coroner Craig Whisenant said today. Adamek's death came less than a week after he was arrested for streaking across the Sparkman High football field during the Senators' Sept. 27 football game against Grissom High School.

Though Sparkman High Principal Michael Campbell declined to comment on Adamek's death today, he told AL.com/Huntsville's news partner, WHNT News 19, on Tuesday that the incident Adamek was accused of could bring the teen major repercussions.

Adamek had been disciplined by the school district, though details of that discipline were not made public, and he faced legal charges. Sparkman High administrators recommended that Adamek have a hearing in the Madison County court system to determine if formal charges would be filed, WHNT reported.
WHNT has memory-holed its coverage, possibly due to the fact that Sparkman High's principal openly discussed Adamek's case during a brief interview. He dodges specifics, but he does drop the names of a few possible charges. (Video available here - also saved from the memory hole.)
Campbell explains minor crime can be a major ordeal. While the principal was not at liberty to discuss the specific disciplinary actions taken by the school, he did confirm the student was not at school Tuesday.

“There’s the legal complications,” says Campbell, “public lewdness and court consequences outside of school with the legal system as well as school consequences that the school system has set up.”

While he was not at liberty to divulge details that lead to the indecent display, Campbell says the incident was much more than a mere prank.

“This situation was totally different, something not related to that at all.”
Now, Principal Campbell's words are unclear. but he hints that there's something more to this than just the streaking event. Or, given the fact that he really shouldn't be talking about a case that covered both by school privacy policies and the shelter of juvenile crime laws, he may just be trying to muddy the water a bit.

Other details have emerged. Adamek was facing expulsion according to his sister. He was arrested and was potentially facing charges for public lewdness and indecent exposure, the latter of which is tied to Alabama's sex offender laws. Long story short, Adamek could have found himself registered as a sex offender as a result of his streaking.

We don't know what other factors played into Adamek's decision to take his own life, but being faced with a future as a "sex offender" couldn't have been pleasant, even if the odds of that happening were extremely slim.

Scott Greenfield asks the obvious question: how will legislators honor Adamek?
When a teenager commits suicide because he felt bullied by others who said mean things about him, there is invariably a law passed to make sure it never happens again. In the pursuit of a perfect world, no child should ever feel so badly as to do himself harm. What law will they pass for Christian Adamek?

There are many things that can be said about the streak, that it was immature and stupid. No doubt someone will cry that it created a sexually hostile environment, as seems to be the cry with all things involving nudity. In response to those who call this a juvenile prank, someone will passionately explain the grave harm this does to the moral fabric of society...

And so the Sparkman High School powers of saving grace decided to drop every bomb they had on Christian Adamek. They’ll show him. He’ll never do anything like that again. And indeed, he won’t.
His fellow students called him a "legend" on Twitter. His school ensured he would greatly regret his childish act. In between, there are many, many unanswered questions, but given the general inability of most school administrators to see immature behavior as anything more than punishable violations, it's completely conceivable that Adamek had the book thrown at him. That he was arrested is indication enough that the school wished to reestablish its power through a show of force.

Did this lead directly to Adamek's suicide? There's no way to know for sure, but it probably was a factor. It's never as simple as it appears. Any suicide tied to social media bullying is more complex than the ultra-thin media coverage that often accompanies it. Suicide is usually related to a culmination of events, not one single incident, but a sudden sense of hopelessness can greatly contribute to the unfortunate decision.

And for those who might point out that Adamek had only a slim chance of being charged with two misdemeanors and placed on Alabama's sex offender registry, let me just point out that the reality of the situation isn't immediately apparent to those trapped inside, not while the machinery is still in motion.

Was Aaron Schwartz really going to go to jail for dozens of years? The odds are that his sentence would have been much lighter than what was being presented by the government's prosecutors. Any amount of prison time is hell to face for most people, but staring into a chasm that has suddenly opened up under your feet and seeing nothing but blackness staring back is seriously debilitating, even for otherwise healthy, happy people.

Adamek was likely being presented with the worst case scenario this early in the process. He would have expected some repercussions, but it's unlikely he considered that he'd be arrested, much less facing a possible sex offender status. During that week following his arrest, the worst case scenario would have replayed repeatedly in his mind.

How will the school spin this one? Will Sparkman's administration feel justified that it stood up to one teen and his childish action and saved the school from an unimaginable fate?
So did you show him, Principal Campbell? Are you pleased that your rules served their purpose? When you decided that the “legend,” the laughter, the applause would destroy the decorum of your school, did you consider that the price would be one young man’s life?
Chances are it won't spend much time defending itself. Why should it? It has school policy and criminal law on its side. It did the "right" thing. And either directly or indirectly as a result of the principal's decision to make one student "aware of the consequences," a 15-year-old student is no longer alive.

The DHS Has Been Using A Fake Mexican Constitution Article To Deport US Citizens For 35 Years

The DHS Has Been Using A Fake Mexican Constitution Article To Deport US Citizens For 35 Years