The Earth vs. The Nazi Flying Saucers – Moon Bases, Space Wars and the Moon Hoax

By Olav Phillips   http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2013/06/the-earth-vs-the-nazi-flying-saucers-moon-bases-space-wars-and-the-moon-hoax/
Many years ago I was introduced to the amazing videos of Ed Grimsley, who at the time was discussing the idea that UFOs were engaging in some level of extra-atmospheric combat.  At the time I dismissed the idea, thinking if a alien ship had come all this way that alien ship would posses enough destructive power to render our defensive apparatus null and void and simply blow anything we could throw at it out of the sky.
Now many years later, and especially given recent research into the Secret Space Program as well as the actual composition of battle platforms in space that maybe Grimsley was on to something.  He was on to something but I suspect it was not aliens dooking it out with earthmen but instead a space war between a breakaway civilization and its earthly brethren.
There are a couple of alternatives here.  It could be the United States vs. the Russians in a battle royal but I suspect not because a hot war in space should translate into a VERY hot war down here on earth.  Instead I have come to believe that the battle is between a Nazi derived breakaway civilization and the combined governments of NATO and the Russian Federation possibly even China as well.  So why do I believe this?  I know it sounds fairly far fetched but to answer that we need to take a small course in “Star Wars” both from a US perspective as well as a Russian perspective.  We also need to balance that against Gary McKinnon’s findings and the Nazi UFO research which has been of the forefront in my mind the last few years.
SPACE WEAPONS:  Glittering C-Beams off the Taunhauser Gate
Since the 1950’s both groups have embarked on a long range and costly journey to build weapons systems in space.  On the surface these programs were put in place to destroy or prevent destruction.  Billions of dollars have been spent on both sides to do some very interesting research, some of which will shock you.
 Project Thor – Project Thor or Thor’s Hammer is a space based defense system utilizing tungsten rods to create kinetic energy weapons.  On the surface of it Thor was designed to hit Soviet installations and military forces using a very lethal but non-nuclear system.  In reality as quick as Thor can be used to target the surface of the Earth it could also be rotated to fire these rods out into space at slow moving targets or with the proper trajectory it could be fired against larger bodies like the Moon or even Mars, theoretically.
Project SeeSaw – Project SeeSaw was initiated by the JASON group to build particle beam weapons.  The project started in the late 1960’s and later was publicly abandoned though it did find some success.  It falling out of public view may have been to deflect its true purpose.  Once implemented as part of the larger SDI program SeeSaw would have give us not only aircraft mounted particle beams but also orbiting defense platforms.tha
Project Sipapu – Originally an Army project to build land based particle beam weapons. This is the kind of weapons system which could be deployed to next generation fighting units on both a handheld basis or via modifying tanks to carry the weapon system. Its objective was to build space based weapons systems.
The “Chair Heritage” Program – Little is known about Chair Heritage outside of it being a Navy project to build particle beam weapons for ships.
Brilliant Pebbles  - Brilliant pebbles was a stroke of genius.  The essential theory behind Brilliant Pebbles was to build a delivery system which could fire a canister of high velocity pellets at a target.  These pellets or pebbles traveling at a high rate of speed would effectively shred the target in a cloud of kinetic energy weapons.  It is the same principle as Thor but on a smaller scale.
Solar Warden 1 – The information about this Solar Warden comes to us from a whistle blower who called into an interview I was a part of on the Ground Zero radio show.  He stated that in the 1970s he had worked, as an engineer, on a highly secret (protected by Federal Marshals) program to build a constellation of three satellites.  The first two satellites would be parked in an equatorial orbit and use a particle beam to hit targets (possibly the logical outcome of SeeSaw) while the third satellite was an autonomous hunter killer satellite which would patrol the skies. The whistle-blower went on to say that the system was deployed with the rest of the SDI system successfully in the 1980s.
Solar Warden 2 – This is the infamous program stumbled upon by hacker Gary McKinnon which described off-world ships, troops and crews which functioned as a space fleet.  He located manifests, logs and registers of the ships including some rather odd ship names.  McKinnon’s findings are controversial but I believe they past the sniff test for many reasons but one of which is the lengths the United States government went to in order to attempt to try him. They wanted him gone, and they worked hard at it.  The other reason I believe there may be some validity to the claims is around what he found.  Much of what he found appears to be logistical in nature and while secret probably carried a lower secrecy rating then say specifications of the ships.  It should all be highly highly classified but one would suspect that logistical data would be a little lower and probably was the cause of the breech.
MANNED BATTLE PLATFORMS:  Have Space Canon, uh I Mean Particle Canon, Will Travel
Ok so at this point we can see starting in the late 1950’s there was an aggressive line of research coming out of the military to build space based weapons.  At the same time the military, both Soviet and American, embarked on a manned battle platform strategy.
We’ll never know how successful the programs were, but conventionally we are told the plans were never completed or the carcass of the battle station was deorbited and burned up.  I can understand the logic of believing the conventional but I think in this case and given what we’ve seen over time I think there is a case which can be made that at some level these stations were built and are up there, or maybe they have been superseded by automated defense systems.  We do need to remember that DARPA is almost 50 years ahead of us here in the conventional world.
So what did they come up with?
The Manned Observation Laboratory (The MOL) – United States Air Force project to build and later deploy a manned battle station equipped with a laser.  The two man crew, both Air Force astronauts, and yes the USAF does have its own astronaut corp.  were designated to spend three to six months onboard.  Armed with a laser canon, or possibly a particle cannon, their mission ostensibly was  to be ready to attack then Soviet space based platforms or space planes (maybe even UFOs?).
The Almaz – The Almaz was the Soviet equivalent to the MOL.  It was indeed launched and crewed for sometime and was armed with a 23mm cannon.  The cannon was actually a massive engineering feet since the designers actually had to place rockets on the sides of the Almaz to counter act the force of the firing.  Cosmonauts who served on the Almaz report that it was quite an adventure to fire the canon and we know that it was indeed fired several times.
Personal conversations I’ve had with several people who worked on the Soviet space program indicate that there were possibly up to three Almaz stations in orbit and they were fully equipped to attack if ordered.  Were there MOL’s in orbit? Yes there was at least one, and the crew was carried up to it via a Gemini-B launch vehicle.
But what about SkyLab?  There are rumors that Skylab was armed as well but I have seen no concrete evidence of it, but that being said it stands to reason that it could have been.  It would make since especially considering the compositions of the crew, all military, and the proximity of the Skylab program and the ending of the MOL program.
Now the 2 billion dollar question, what is up there now?  We’ve heard over time from various researchers, including Bill Birnes who is definitely in the know, that there are stations in geosynchronous orbit over key sites.  Birnes has maintained for some time there is a station locked over Nellis AFB.  Which would make sense since there is a significant amount of research going on at Area 51 to this end and if the stations or to defend against an outside threat (i.e. Nazi’s) then it would make sense to park them in a stationary orbit over major defense facilities or population centers.  Given the technology today it also would not be beyond the pale to expect crew changes, a la Solar Warden, were being done via a next generation spacecraft.
The MOL and Almaz were very real projects with paper trails so we do indeed know both of these battle stations were placed in orbit so I think it is logical to assume others could have been built in orbit or on the Moon and ferried over. The will was there as was the funding.
 MOON BASES: No Really! There is a Moon Base.
The 1960’s was a turbulent time, unpopular wars, social unrest and apparently a vigorous space weapons program so it should not surprise us that even while the MOL was being operated both the Army and Air Force had also come up with plans to occupy the Moon. The Soviets had a program to!
 Project Horizon – A US Army project to build a Moon base by 1967.  The base would have offensive and defense capabilities as was to be staffed by a crew of over 200 specially trained Army soldier/astronauts by 1965.  Again as we have seen this project was publically killed off but that doesn’t mean it didn’t enter the special access projects realm where there is lots of money and no oversight.
 Project Lunex – Project Lunex was the Air Force equivalent to Horizon and called for a crew of 21 to live on this underground defense station at a cost of a mere $7.5 billion.  The interesting part of this project is that it pre-dated the Apollo program and if operational may explain why the Moon Hoax theories swirl around even to this day.
 Project Zvezda – Zvezda was a Soviet project similar to Horizon and included, at least at some level, conversations between the Soviet space program and our own to jointly operate and man the base.  Again I think its safe to assume, given the direction of weapons development, that this base too was almost certainly armed.
 THE MOON HOAX: Was there a Hoax and if so why?
When we look at the Moon theory one thing has always jumped out at me.  I don’t believe we fully faked the Moon landing.  I know that will draw the eire of some but I think there is penty of evidence we landed including the ability to use a telescope and see the junk left behind by the Apollo missions.  Its true you can use a telescope and see the junk we left behind.  Obviously these projects did not include the basic law of camping which is to leave it better then you found it.
So why the falsification?
I think, given what we know about Horizon and Lunex it is not beyond the realm to believe that Armstrong and Aldrin may have indeed seen something they were not supposed to so steps were taken to coverup what they saw.
Think of how defeating it would have been to Armstong to jump off the LEM and pronounce “This is one small step man and one giant leap for mankind, oh what why are those guys standing on the ridge staring at us? This is the plausible scenario.
Apollo 11 was off course and missed its landing zone, so Armstrong had to manually land the LEM so they landed in an unprepared location.  So by landing in a unprepared location they, the astronauts, may have been exposed to technology or people they were unprepared for.  What followed was a tour de ‘force of covering up.  Fake photos, brainwashing, maybe even the involvement of Stanley Kubrick its all there for the asking.  In fact as evidence of the level of cover-up perpetrated on the Apollo 11 program there is an interesting story  Buzz Aldrin relayed while being interviewed on C-SPAN which I think does lend a level of credence to this line of research.
During the interview Aldrin was asked what it was like on the Moon, and he responded by talking about seeing the tiny blue dot of the earth and speaking about “Magnificent Desolation,” but he also said when he originally came back to Earth he was at a dinner party and someone had asked him the same question.  Aldrin said he didn’t know how to answer and started to panic, effectively having a panic attack, and headed off to the bathroom where he threw up.  This is a classic mind control block, and is placed over a memory to stop that memory from surfacing.  Instead the victim feels physically ill to deflect the topic.
Something was obviously up because shortly after the fanfare had died away Armstrong went into seclusion and only rarely granted interview.  Why would a national hero hide?  Because he is just a shy guy who doesn’t like the attention? Possibly but more then likely he knew that he had participated in something amazing, amazingly dangerous because he had seen things.
SUMMARY
Its obvious something is happening, I think we can only continue to overstate the obvious on that.  We have independent confirmation from sources that both NATO and the Russian Federation have a significant investment in exotic and space based weapons.
We are told that investment was for a missile shield, we are told that was for World War III but the truth is World War III never came.  There was no attack nor would there ever be because of the MAD principle (Mutually Assured Destruction).  War planners on both sides could see no end state where a limited nuclear exchange took place, to initiate that kind of armed conflict would only end with the destruction of the entire planet.
So why all the weapons and weapons programs?  Why is Ed Grimsley getting some amazing footage, consistently, of a battle in space?  I would argue that it is because those weapons are not to protect us from the Russians or vice versa.  Instead I would argue there is a war in space, right now and Grimsley has found a way to capture it.  But who is that war against?  I know it sounds like the plot of a recent film but I would say those platforms and weapons systems are design to keep people way and I think the best candidate for that break away group is some derivative of the Nazi regime.  A regime in hiding on the Moon or more likely Mars.
Need some proof?  In the 1990’s there was a slate of triangular UFO sightings across Europe and a few in the United States as well.  These UFOs tended to follow motor ways and hang out near military or telecommunications facilities.  They also were shoot beams of light into select grave yards.
Now I know what you are thinking, aliens would do that?  The obvious question is why?  Are they monitoring our nuclear reactors as space brothers sent from Venus who want to make sure we protect our environment?  Probably not, more likely they are Nazi ships watching our capabilities.  That makes sense and passes the sniff test.
I will also give you one final element to ponder.  Back in the 1950’s there was a man named Valiant Thor.  Valiant Thor claimed to have been from Venus, and maybe he was, but he was taken to the Pentagon and along with his two companions had some sort of briefing inside the Pentagon.
So who was he really?  If you look at Valiant Thor, he, like many aliens seen at that time, were called Nordics because they possess a Nordic look, they were tall had blond hair (sometimes brown)  blue eyes and were known to converse in a strange language which may  have indeed been German. We also need to look at his name Valiant Thor which represents the brave god of thunder (Thor) in Nordic legend. So its not surprising to me at least his name is derived from Nordic mythos if he is derived from a Nazi base.
Nordics?  Nazi super soldiers?  Possibly, I think that is more likely then people from Venus unless of course there is a base there. It is also interesting to point out that many abductees from that era have claimed the aliens (Nordics) spoke in a funny language which sounded like German and in some cases had German accents.
I thinkits also fair to point out that many of the UFO’s seen during the contatee era largely match the designs of the Haunebu style or Vril style of Nazi UFO!
These facts with the space based weapons leads us to a conclusion that they, the SDI systems, might actually be defensive weapons against German based saucers and if what Grimsley is seeing is accurate (and I have personally witnessed it) then I think we need to start to understand who is fighting who for what objective and I think we need to take aliens out of the equation.  This is a fight for ideology and technology not an advanced guard from the alien mothership coming down to take over out planet.
SUGGESTED LINKS:
http://www.paranoiamagazine.com/2013/05/ground-zero-disclosure-olav-phillips-and-rob-daven-on-solar-warden/
http://conspiracyhq.com/lasers-ufos-and-sdi-new-evidence-of-the-war-in-space-space-warden-and-the-hidden-military-machine-in-orbit-or-is-it-another-secret-space-program/

THE TRANSHUMANIST SCRAPBOOK: REGENERATED RAT LIMB SUCCESSFULLY GROWN, GRAFTED, AND TESTED

Posted on June 18, 2015 by Joseph P. Farrell •http://gizadeathstar.com/2015/06/the-transhumanist-scrapbook-regenerated-rat-limb-successfully-grown-grafted-and-tested/

Here's another story for your transhumanism scrapbook (in this case, shared by Mr. M.N.); the U.K.'s Daily Mail is reporting in a very interesting article, that scientists have now successfully "reanimated" a dead rat limb, transplanted it onto a rat, which was then able to use the resuscitated limb in a limited way:
World's first BIOLIMB created: Dead arm 'brought back to life' in the lab could allow amputees to grow replacement limbs
Here's the crux of the story:

Hands, arms and even legs, can be transplanted, but the operations are complex and patients have to take powerful immunosuppressant drugs - which weaken the immune system to prevent the rejection of a transplant - for life.

In contrast, a lab-grown arm or leg should look and move more naturally.

And because it is made out of the person's own cells, no immunosuppression would be needed.

Dr Ott, who has previously made kidneys, livers, lungs and even beating hearts in the lab, began by taking a forearm from a dead rat.

He then washed it in detergent to stop its cells, leaving only a framework behind.

The frame was then placed in an incubator-type jar, injected with healthy blood vessel and muscle cells, and fed nutrients and oxygen.

In just two to three weeks, the blood vessels and muscles had rebuilt, this week's New Scientist reports.

When the limb was attached to a living rat, blood quickly flowed through it.

The creature was even able to flex its new paw.

The trouble here, as noted in the article, is that this technology still requires a "donor" limb which is apparently stripped to its bones, and the new limb "grown" around it:

A new limb would then be created using the framework of a donated limb and the patient's own cells.

We've covered other stories about the growing leaps and bounds in prosthetics in the latest medical, as well and robotic and mechanical science. Artificial retinas under development that could not only solve some problems of human blindness, but actually result in a kind of "bionic man" improvement of vision. Forget about new glasses. Just order up some new eyes (be sure to check the box for your preferred color of eyeball... designer pastels cost extra) with optional infrared, ultraviolet, night vision and zoom and wide angle lens capability.

Imagine now the integration of such bio-mechanical interfaces with the new regenerative and resuscitation techniques and technologies being developed: need new bones? They can be manufactured (or grown) from your own stored DNA samples: donors no longer needed. Just access your stored DNA and genetic database in the cloud, For a fee, of course, and hopefully they won't have "edited" it. And hopefully, they'll transplant a human limb, and not something else...

“Conspiracy Theories”: The Public Trust Skepticism Factor

By Dr. Katherine Smith

Global Research, June 17, 2015

thepeoplesvoice.org 20 October 2008

Region: USA

Theme: Culture, Society & History

“Conspiracy” is a real word for a real event that has existed in human societies in all cultures throughout human history. [Appendix A]
The assassination of the President of the United States on national television by a “lone” assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, who himself is assassinated the next day by another “lone” assassin—would cause even the most rational skeptic, or critical thinker, to question the institutional narrative of the events. [1]
In other words, the institutional narrative, or official explanation, of a lone assassin, who was in turn assassinated the very next day by another lone assassin, is as epistemically dubious, and as equally “silly and without merit,” as any of the conspiracy theories surrounding the JFK assassination.
The human species has evolved as pattern-seeking, cause-inferring animals. As such, our nature drives us to find meaningful relationships to understand the world. Conspiracy theories are offered as alternate explanation to an important social, political or economic event (henceforward, “The Event”) when the institutional narrative is confusing or unsatisfactory. Conspiracy, originally a neutral term, has acquired a somewhat derogatory meaning since the mid sixties, for it implies a paranoid tendency to see the influence of some malign covert agency in certain events. Conspiracy theorizing has become commonplace in the mass media and emerged as a cultural phenomenon in the United States following the public assassination of JFK.
Noam Chomsky, linguist and scholar, contrasts conspiracy theory as, more or less, the opposite of institutional analysis. The latter focuses mostly on explanations based on the information found in official records of publicly known institutions, whereas the former offers explanations based on information derived from coalitions of individuals.
Most academics, or the rational community, find the conspiracy theories of popular culture to be silly and without merit, and automatically dismiss such alternative explanations as ridiculous, misconceived, unfounded, outlandish and the result of irrational thinking by paranoid schizophrenics. Some academics even contend that conspiracy theories “undermine human social and civic decency in society.” [2]
However, on closer examination, academics can see, and are forced to admit, that there is no systemic flaw to the concept of the conspiracy theory per se, because 1) there have been at least 33 Conspiracy Theories That Turned Out To Be True and 2) it is in the nature of many conspiracy theories that they cannot be falsified; that is, proven to be false.

In Of Conspiracy Theories, Brian Keeley acknowledges this important point but then argues that it’s not the theory that is the problem, but rather the theorist. The theorists, we are told, display a “particular absence or deformities of critical thinking skills when they refuse to accept the institutional explanation of The Event.” He further wonders whether the problem lies in our teaching methods. [3]
Keeley refers to the numerous historically verified conspiracy theories as Warranted Conspiracy Theories (WCTs), as opposed to theories that have not, or cannot, be verified and are thus, according to Keeley, Unwarranted Conspiracy Theories, (UCTs). When all the academic terminology, doublespeak and jargon are stripped away, a UCT is simply an alternative explanation of The Event that hasn’t been verified by independent sources. [4]
Keeley admits that he and the academic community have no justification to systematically and unilaterally dismiss conspiracy theories as silly and without merit when he writes:

There is no criterion or set of criteria that provide a priori grounds for distinguishing WCTs from UCTs. One might perhaps like to insist here that UCTs ought to be false, and this is why we are not warranted in believing them, but it is in the nature of many conspiracy theories that they cannot be falsified. The best we may do is show why the warrant for believing them is so poor.

And the best he can show as to “why the warrant for believing them is so poor” is public trust skepticism.

It is this pervasive skepticism of people and public institutions entailed by some mature conspiracy theories which ultimately provides us with the grounds with which to identify them as unwarranted.
It is not their lack of falsifiability per se, but a belief in an increasingly massive conspiracy theory that undermines the grounds for believing in anything. Accepting the UCT explanation requires one to question too many of the various institutions that have been set up to generate reliable data and evidence in our world.

At some point, according to Keeley, we shall be forced to recognize the unwarranted nature of the conspiracy if we are to be left with any warranted explanations and beliefs at all.
And finally, as the theory grows to include more and more people and institutions and yet remains unverified, the less plausible the conspiracy becomes; because, it stands to reason that, at some point, someone would have come forward with the missing and necessary data.
Notice the words, “we shall be forced to recognize;” rather than, “we have proof” that the theory is false. Keeley admits that academics are entitled to dismiss a conspiracy theory if a belief in that alternative explanation undermines the grounds for believing in anything. Furthermore, we are entitled to dismiss a mature conspiracy if it involves too many people. Keeley’s take on the JFK assassination mature conspiracy might read as follows:

Even if the CIA, FBI, Secret Service, Police Departments and Coroners offices in two cities, were part of a large conspiracy to cover up their incompetence in the public assassination of JFK, “it is impossible to believe that not a single member of the any of the agencies involved would be moved by guilt, self interest, or some other motivation to reveal the agency’s role in the tragedy, if not to the press, then to a lover or family member. Governmental agencies, even those as regulate and controlled as the military and intelligence agencies, are plagued with leaks and rumors. To propose that an explosive secret could be closeted for any length of time simply reveals a lack of understanding of the nature of modern bureaucracies. Like the world itself, they are made up of too many people with too many different agendas to be easily controlled.”

Keeley asserts that, “we do live in an open world, but only because to think otherwise would lead to disastrous skepticism.” For Keeley, the theorists lack critical thinking skills because they don’t recognize that a belief in a UCT invalidates every other social belief they need to function in society.
In his attempt to prove the theorists are guilty of too much skepticism, Keeley overlooks the implications of the nature, logistics and institutional narrative of The Event. Everything that can be shown to be true about the mature conspiracy theory—unfalsiabiality, skepticism, epistemically dubious—applies to the narrative of The Event.
A close look at the JFK assassination mature conspiracy will illustrate my point.
The JFK Assassination: A mature conspiracy theory case study
Is the institutional narrative of the Oswald lone assassin theory, any more epistemically dubious, or any less “silly and without merit,” as the JFK tin-foil hat conspiracies?

The CIA killed JFK; the Mob killed JFK; the CIA and the Mob working together killed JFK; last but not least, Fidel Castro contracted with the KGB to have JFK killed.

Neither the institutional nor the conspiratorial explanation of the event is a warranted belief and should be dismissed on epistemic grounds. That is, there is sufficient reason to believe that the institutional view, just like the conspiratorial view, of the JFK assassination is false, yet neither view can be falsified.
A conspiratorial explanation of the nature and logistics of The Event is really no more or less rational and logical as the institutional narrative. Thus, Keeley should have written:

There is no criterion or set of criteria that provide a priori grounds for distinguishing warranted conspiracy theories (WCTs) from UCTs or the Institutional View.’ One might perhaps like to insist here that warranted conspiracy theories, UCTs and the Institutional View ought to be false, and this is why we are not warranted in believing in any of them, but it is in the nature of many historical events that they cannot be falsified. The best we may do is show why the warrant for believing in either the conspiracy or the institutional explanation is so poor.

Errant Data and The conspiracy Theory Paradox
No discussion of conspiracy theories would be complete without a discussion of errant data. Anomalies and discrepancies surface immediately upon the announcement of The Event and increase as the conspiracy matures. Errant data, or data that cannot be reconciled with the official explanation of the event, is the chief tool of the conspiracy theorist.
Again, the JFK Assassination illustrates my point. The rational community ignores the details of the rifle, the bullet and the witnesses who heard other shots from other directions (errant data) on the grounds that there is no reliable way to gather social data, as opposed to scientific, data about the human world. [5]
Furthermore, when pressed, people will be ready to admit that the anomalies and inconsistencies (errant data) in the institutional view could never be chance occurrences. They escape the obvious improbability question by correctly pointing out that the errant data, even if true, does not constitute proof of anything, especially that the event was a conspiracy.
Related to errant data is what we shall refer to as the Conspiracy Theory Paradox.
Why would the conspirators, with the ability to plan and manage a conspiracy involving the CIA, FBI, Secret Service, Police Departments and Coroners offices in two cities (e.g., the JFK assassination), come up with such a convoluted senseless plan riddled with so many mistakes, anomalies and discrepancies (errant data)?  And then, inexplicably, that same errant data is ubiquitously exposed in the media for everyone to question. [6]

• Neither the rational nor the conspiracy community have an explanation for why the conspirators would come up with such a convoluted senseless plan when a much simpler plan would accomplish the same goal. Why not have a rogue agent, in the CIA, FBI or Secret Service shoot the president in the middle of the night?

• Neither the rational nor the conspiracy community have an explanation for why the conspirators would allow the mistakes, anomalies, discrepancies and the holes in the “official story” (errant data) to find it’s way into the official institutional record and then allow that same data to be aired on national television for all to question. [7]

• Neither the rational nor the conspiracy community have an explanation for how trivial it would have been for the conspirators to change or falsify the alleged discrepancy or anomaly and avoid the stupid “mistakes.”  Consider how easy it would for the master criminals to just keep the Errant Data from being aired on national television compared to the magnitude of the criminal acts they are alleged to have committed.

Although the existence of a Paradox or Errant Data could never be offered as proof that the Event was a conspiracy, they are none the less consistent, though not proof, with a conspiracy to make you believe the event was a conspiracy. [8]
The Critical Thinking Trap
The Theorists, believing themselves to be truth seekers in assessing the nature, logistics and the institutional explanation of The Event classified as a UCT, are forced into a contradictory belief, or “critical thinking trap.”
Unwilling to abandon what they know to be the truth; that is, that the institutional view is false, [9] theorists are forced into a degenerative research program. A degenerative research program is one where the auxiliary hypotheses and initial conditions are continually modified in light of new evidence in order to protect the original theory from apparent disconfirmation. [10]
Why doesn’t everyone fall into the “critical thinking trap?”
The majority of people exposed to “The Event classified as a UCT,” are apathetic, indifferent and feel powerless because of a belief that the power elite control the world. [11]
The rational community, or anyone who is not a theorists or indifferent, consciously or unconsciously realizes the institutional view cannot be true; but at the same time, again consciously or unconsciously, realize that any alternate explanation or theory would require they question the very foundations of their beliefs about the society they live in. [12]
In “Of Conspiracy Theories” Keeley begins with the premise that the theorists are the problem but ends with the admission that until a third option is presented, the theorists are really only guilty of hyper-skepticism (inherent in supposing dissimulation on a truly massive scale) because the theorists are unable to see that distrusting the claims of our institutions leads to “the absurdism of an irrational and essentially meaningless world.” [13]
When the rational community resort to ad hominem attacks, i.e., conspiracy theories are “silly, without merit” or the result of irrational thinking by paranoid schizophrenics, they reveal how large a role trust—in both institutions and individuals, mechanisms and people —plays in their thinking and beliefs about UCTs.
What can we say about the institutional narrative, the Conspiracy Theory Paradox and the Errant Data? The Theorists are really only guilty of not recognizing the institutional narrative, the Conspiracy Theory Paradox and the Errant Data are consistent with, but not necessarily proof, of a Conspiracy to make you believe the event was a Conspiracy. [14]
Notes
[1] The assassination of the President of the United States on national television by a lone assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, who according to authorities used an obsolete bolt-action WWI rifle that was not capable of firing bullets fast enough to wound, let alone kill, John F. Kennedy, who himself is assassinated the next day by another lone assassin—would cause even the most rational skeptic, or critical thinker, to question the institutional narrative of the events.
Is there any justification for a belief that the Warren Commission properly investigated the assassination of JFK when they concluded Oswald acted alone when he used a heavily oiled cheap rifle with a distorted sight, hidden in a paper sack later discovered on the sixth floor without a trace of oil, to for his miraculous feat of marksmanship with extraordinary accuracy at a moving target in minimal time?
The Warren Commission when faced with the impossibility of the shooting came up with the single bullet theory:
The Warren Commission reported that a single bullet hit Kennedy in the back of the neck and exited from the throat just below the Adam’s apple, and that same bullet entered Connally’s back, exited from his chest, went completely through his right wrist, and lodged in his left thigh.
Or is there any justification for a belief the United States House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA) properly investigated the assassination of JFK when they concluded concluded in 1978 that “the original FBI investigation and the Warren Commission Report to be seriously flawed and that there were at least four shots fired and only three of which could be linked to Oswald. The report concluded that the “CIA, the Soviet Union, organized crime, and several other groups were not involved,” but “they could not rule out the involvement of individual members of those groups.”
[2] Stephen Jay Gould, the evolutionary Theorist at Harvard University considers conspiracy theorizing “garbage” and believes they must be “discredited [/debunked] in order for society to lead “a safe and sane life.” Gould believes we are vulnerable “thinking reeds,” as opposed to rational creatures, and that unless “we rigorously use human reason, we will lose out to frightening forces of irrationality, romanticism, uncompromising “true” belief which will result in the inevitability of mob action.
[3] An article, “Of Conspiracy Theories,” written by Brian Keeley and published in the Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 96, No. 3. (Mar., 1999) attempts to explain why so many people refuse to accept the institutional view he wonders if “our approach to teaching thinking/reason skills” is the problem that cause so many members of society (The Irrational Thinkers) to believe in them.”
Keeley writes:

“It is incumbent upon philosophers to provide analysis of the errors involved with common delusions, if that is indeed what they are. If a kind of academic snobbishness underlies our previous refusal to get involved here, there may be another reason. Conspiracy theorising, in political philosophy at least, has been identified with irrationality of the worst sort—here the locus classicus may be some dismissive remarks made by Karl Popper in The Open Society and its Enemies (Popper 1996, Vol.2: 94-9). Pigden (1993) shows convincingly that Popper’s remarks cannot be taken to support a rational presumption against conspiracy theories in history and politics. (summary: Keeley rejects Popper, and this causes a change.)

[4] Unwarranted Conspiracy Theories  (UCTs) and Warranted Conspiracy Theories (WCTs)
Characteristics of Unwarranted Conspiracy Theories (UCTs)

1. A UCT is an explanation that runs counter to some received, official, or “obvious” account’ (116-7). In many instances there exists the presence of a “cover story” that is perceived as the most damning piece of evidence for the given historical event under consideration.
2. UCTs typically seek to tie together seemingly unrelated events and because Conspiracy Theorists rarely if ever have a coherent beginning-to-end narrative of what they think happened, many of their theories wind up laying the blame on some other force; e.g., the Illuminati.
3. ‘The chief tool of the Conspiracy Theorist is errant data, or anomalies and discrepancies in information. Keeley defines errant data as data that cannot be reconciled with the official explanation of the event; or data, which true, would tend to contradict official explanations and support the cover story.

Characteristics of Unwarranted Conspiracy Theorists

1. The Fundamental Attribution Error. Conspiracy Theorists have a tendency to focus on errant data and are prone to making what Keeley refers to as the  “fundamental attribution error.” The “fundamental attribution error” is the idea that all UCTs can be reduced to a supposed discrepancy or anomaly in one official record or another.
2. The Degenerative Research Program. Conspiracy Theorists exhibit irrational behavior when their theories take on the appearance of forming the core of a degenerative research program.
3. Dispositional versus Situational. Conspiracy Theorists severely overestimate the importance of dispositional factors while underestimating the importance of situational factors when attempting to explain the Conspiracy event.

[5] Errant Data, [anomalies and inconsistencies] which are unaccounted for by official [Institutional] explanations, which if true, would tend to contradict official explanations,  cannot be relied upon, because while it is appropriate to place great stress on explaining errant data in the natural sciences, it is inappropriate in the social sciences. [citation]
Errant data is only errant in relation to an accepted theory, and to discount errant data on grounds that apply to both errant and non-errant data would be to prejudice oneself in favor of data simply because it happens to be explained by the received theory.
[6] At bottom what we face here is what we might term Goodenough’s Paradox of Conspiracies: the larger or more powerful an alleged conspiracy, the less need they have for conspiring. A sufficiently large collection of members of the American political, intelligence and military establishment—the kind of conspiracy being alleged by Oliver Stone et al.—wouldn’t need to engage in such nefarious activity since they would have the kind of organisation, influence, access to information, etc. that could enable them to achieve their goal efficiently and legally.
Note the existence of the paradox while it favors the Rational community is not proof the institutional view is correct.  The fact that Theorists have no rational explanation of why the conspirators would make so many stupid mistakes reminds me of one of the central arguments of why nature does not imply design. Evolutionists dismiss the design (Intelligent Design) argument for nature because they question the design of the human eye.
[7] ‘The chief tool of the Conspiracy Theorist is errant data, or anomalies and discrepancies in information. Keeley defines errant data as data that cannot be reconciled with the official explanation of the event; or data, which true, would tend to contradict official explanations and support the cover story.
For example the JFK Assassination.
The rational community will knowingly ignore the details of the rifle, the bullet and the witnesses who heard other shots from other directions [errant data] and point out that while a Conspiracy Theory has epistemic value and does provide a unifying explanation of the event and the errant data, there is no reliable way to gather social data, as opposed to scientific, data about the human world.

• Errant Data, [anomalies and inconsistencies] which are unaccounted for by official [Institutional] explanations, which if true, would tend to contradict official explanations,  cannot be relied upon, because while it is appropriate to place great stress on explaining errant data in the natural sciences, it is inappropriate in the social sciences. [citation]

Errant data is only errant in relation to an accepted theory, and to discount errant data on grounds that apply to both errant and non-errant data would be to prejudice oneself in favor of data simply because it happens to be explained by the received theory.
Furthermore, they will admit that the anomalies and inconsistencies [errant data] in the Institutional view could never be chance occurrences but at the same time they correctly point out the errant data does not constitute proof of anything, especially that the event was a conspiracy.
[8] Is there any doubt that “there is a conspiracy to make you believe in a conspiracy”?
The JFK Conspiracy Theory Paradox
[9] In 1978 the House Select Committee on Assassinations concluded in a preliminary report that Kennedy was “probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy” that may have involved multiple shooters and organized crime.
[10] A progressive research program is where “novel predictions and retrodictions are verified.
What I have demonstrated is that there is no justification for a belief in either the Institutional view or the Conspiratorial View of a UCT. Critical thinking skills on the part of the Theorists force them into a degenerative research program. Critical thinking skills on the part of the Rational Community are used to avoid a degenerative research program.
[11] Conspiracy and the Social Sciences
“There Are No Conspiracies” by G. William Domhoff in 2005 looks at Conspiracy Theories and the Power Elite from a social science perspective. [as opposed to the philosophical] G. William Domhoff, a Research Professor at the University of California, Santa Cruz first coined the non-conspiracy acronym TPTB. He received his Ph.D. at the University of Miami and has been teaching at the University of California, Santa Cruz, since 1965. Four of his books are among the top 50 best sellers in sociology on the Power Elite Theory for the years 1950 to 1995: Who Rules America? (1967); The Higher Circles (1970); Who Rules America Now? (1983); and the non-“conspiracy” critique and theory of the U.S. power structure, The Powers That Be (TPTB) in 1979.
The Power Elite theory, despite a superficial resemblance to some right-wing conspiracy theories, has key differences from them. The latter take, as the primary motive force of history, that “America is ruled from behind the scenes by a select conspiratorial group with secret desires united around some esoteric or gratuitously evil ideology.
And while the concentration of political and economic power [in the control of small, interlocking elites], is indeed likely to result in sporadic conspiracies; such a conspiracy is not necessary to the working of the system–it 1) simply occurs as a secondary phenomenon, and 2) occasionally speeds up or intensifies processes that happen for the most part automatically.
[12] The confidence in authorities would be so eroded that they are no longer warranted in holding any beliefs that are socially produced and puts one in the position of no longer being able to trust any of the institutions that we rely on in to function in the world. (Keeley 1999, 121). Such epistemic endpoints appear to embody a degree of skepticism that is too high to be acceptable by anyone.” Brian Keeley
[13] The rejection of conspiracy thinking is not simply based on the belief that conspiracy theories are false as a matter of fact. The source of the problem goes much deeper. The world as we understand it today is made up of an extremely large number of interacting agents, each with it’s own imperfect view of the world and it’s own set of goals. Such a system cannot be controlled because there are simply too many agents to be handled by any small controlling group. There are too many independent degrees of freedom.  This is true of the economy, of the political electorate, and of the social, fact-gathering institutions upon which conspiracy theorists cast doubt.”
[14] The Transparent Conspiracy is a collection of essays by Michael Morrisey. Morrisey, who holds a Ph.D. in linguistics from Cornell University, expands on the idea that the leaders (conspirators) “failed on purpose” and coined the phrase the “Mass Psychology of Partial Disclosure.” Morrisey makes a compelling argument that there exists a conspiracy that involves the controlled media disclosing a limited amount of information concerning the government’s culpability in atrocities such as the JFK, MLK and RFK assassinations.  Morrisey believes a shadow government orchestrates a well-managed conspiracy/cover-up in order to intimidate, demoralize and alienate the tuned-in segment of the population that fully comprehends the corrupt nature of our government institutions.
The government’s purpose, according to Morrisey, is keep the masses in a state of helplessness so they will be unable to upset the not-so-secret plans for what is referred to as for a New World Order. While his arguments are persuasive revisionist History contradicts any justification that the masses need to be kept in a state of helplessness. All of the Revolutions have shown to be the product of the elite and not the popular uprisings we were let to believe in our filtered history books.
Appendix A
A Short Course in “Conspiracy Science.”
“Conspiracy” is a REAL word for a REAL act that has existed in human societies in all cultures throughout human history. If conspiracies did not exist, we would not have a word for it. The problem that we face today is that the US Government has arrogated to itself a singular role as a political pontificate that believes that it and its agents in the Justice Department, alone, constitute the only “person” (corporate person) on this Earth who is allowed to use the word “conspiracy” as it employs the charge of “conspiracy” every week in trials to put both guilty and innocent people in jail while deriding and discrediting all others who employ the word as “conspiracy theorists.”
World-renowned author, investigator and philosopher, Paris Flammonde, has also completed a major work, “The Assassination of America,” a rebuttal to the lies and disinformation of the Warren Commission Report and the House Select Committee Investigation on Political Assassinations conducted during the Carter Administration

THE TRANSHUMANISM SCRAPBOOK: THE GENOME IN THE CLOUD?

Posted on June 17, 2015 by Joseph P. Farrell

As most regular readers of this site are aware, I am highly skeptical of all the moves to digitize information and have records entirely in digital form. For me, the dangers for corporate and government mischeif here are all too palpable. It would be a Stalinist disinformation expert's deepest aspirations: editing the Soviet Encylopedia with the flick of a switch, so to speak. That troublesome picture of Yezhov and Stalin bothering the official narrative? Photoshop it out and digitally alter all digital copies. Forget about having to round up all the pre-purge physical copies of the encyclopedia embarassing to comrade Stalin. Just push the button and all those ebooks are automatically altered. You saved a screen copy of the old version? Try printing it out... oh, wait, the carbon tax on your paper printer are too high for you to afford, so you can't print out the evidence. Forget about sharing it online, because the data filtration algorithms will flag your screen copy, and automatically delete it before it has time to spread.
Now, imagine that power, coupled with the human genome, in this article shared by Mr. T.L.:
Google goes up against Amazon in billion dollar race to get your DNA into the cloud
Of course, this is all being promoted as yet another wonderful advance of technology (which, of course, it is):

That growth is being propelled by, among other forces, the push for personalized medicine, which aims to base treatments on a patient's DNA profile.

Making that a reality will require enormous quantities of data to reveal how particular genetic profiles respond to different treatments.

Already, universities and drug manufacturers are embarking on projects to sequence the genomes of hundreds of thousands of people.

The human genome is the full complement of DNA, or genetic material, a copy of which is found in nearly every cell of the body.

Clients view Google and Amazon as doing a better job storing genomics data than they can do using their own computers, keeping it secure, controlling costs and allowing it to be easily shared.(Emphasis added)

It's that "allowing it to be easily shared" part that bothers me, for the question is "easily shared with whom? and for what price? and how will this cata be protected? More importantly, with the recent advent of high tech genetic editing technologies, what will prevent "editing" being done to one's DNA secretly, under the guise of "personalized treatment" or, worse, to any genetic samples of one's DNA?

Follow my high octane speculation here and assume, for a moment, that cloning technology had been perfected, and that you had somehow upset the powers that be, who clone a version of you while you are removed to undergo "attitude adjustment" and "behavior modification" and "values clarification", and then are returned (hopefully!) to public life.

Worse yet, why store your DNA "in the cloud" at all? The action has the quality of that "heirloom seed bank" in Norway, a kind of "Noah's Ark" quality... or, perhaps even worse, the quality of a tribute being paid or some type of long range plan involving space, perhaps.

To put it "country simple," I have the impression, and it's nothing more than an intuition, that this is yet another "meme" being deliberately pushed, along with space mining and commercialization, alternative energy, "decarbonization" and a whole host of other memes. What it all adds up to is anyone's guess, but with the above speculations, you have some of mine...

Jupiter Ascending – Feminist Gnostic Liberation

jay008 / http://jaysanalysis.com/2015/06/18/jupiter-ascending-feminist-gnostic-liberation/

Queen of Earth and Lysol.

By: Jay Dyer Jupiter Ascending was not a particularly memorable film. Full of CGI vomit, the last installment from the Wachowskis presented a sci fi opera that recalls Star Wars and their own Matrix series, blended with 70s Battlestar Galactica space glam. This time, however, the space opera revolves around the reversal of the classic mythological identification of Jupiter or Jove with a rational, male deity, into Russo babe Mila Kunis. This gender flip, as well as Lana Wachowki’s flip is a signifier of the esoteric aspect of the film: GMOs.
GMO is not what you think I mean: In Jupiter Ascending, the “G” is a gnostic modified organism. Like all other aspects of life, I have highlighted the technocratic plan to alter the biosphere, and quite amazingly, the entire plot of Jupiter Ascending reveals this strategy. Not only does the film reveal this overall plan, it also demonstrates the occultic background for the ideas of cloning, genetic modification and transmutation, astrotheology/exotheology, as well as elite bloodlines and their parasitical “harvesting” relationship to the masses.
Stranded on earth as a reincarnate version of a semi-immortal, Jupiter (Mila Kunis) is an unassuming house maid who discovers her inner girl power goddess when a GMO “Lycant” named Caine (Channing Tatum) swoops in from outer space in to make her life interesting. Jupiter had been roped into donating her eggs to a fertility clininc which turns out to be run by a race of greys, chipmunk chattering aliens that control earth for the Abrasax Dynasty (more on this in a bit). Worth noting here is the hint of what really is true – that the elites do manage and run facilities like Cold Springs Harbor, the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute and other fronts and shells organization that exist to utilize eggs for experimentation and modification.
Hailed as the queen of earth, Jupiter is embroiled in an intergalactic War of the Roses to control vials of glowing blue juice that restores youth. Earth, being an inheritance of the gods (and her own inheritance), is ripe for magical DNA harvest which we predictably learn creates the Kool-Aid juice of life. It is worth noting that Caine, in gnostic mythology, is actually the hero, while Abel, his brother is fingered as the villain. As with Cloud Atlas and The Matrix, the Wachowski style of such inversions are standard fare.  Indeed, the creation of the homonuli as well as the golem are old fascinations of esotericists, and even still alchemical process to transmute and transcend nature charges eerily towards the kind of world envisioned in Jupiter Ascending.  Commenting on this notion, theosophist Gary Lachman explains, citing Paracelsus:

“The question arises then: What is the homunculus and what is the golem? Franz Hartmann’s 1896 Life of Paracelsus defines homunculi as “artificially made human beings, generated from the sperm without the assistance of the female organism (black magic.)” The Swiss alchemist Theophrastus Bombast von Hohenheim, otherwise known as Paracelsus (1493–1541), is recognized by many as an early master of holistic medicine and natural healing. It was from Paracelsus that Goethe, a great reader of alchemical and occult literature, got the idea of the homunculus which he used in the second part of Faust. Paracelsus offered a complete recipe for creating a homunculus:

‘If the sperma, enclosed in a hermetically sealed glass, is buried in horse manure for forty days, and properly magnetized, it begins to live and move. After such a time it bears the form and resemblance of a human being, but it will be transparent and without a body. If it is now artificially fed with the Arcanum sanguinis hominis until it is about forty weeks old, and if allowed to remain during that time in horse manure in a continually equal temperature, it will grow into a human child, with all its members developed like any other child, such as could be born by a woman; only it will be much smaller. We call such a being a homunculus, and it may be raised and educated like any other child, until it grows older and obtains reason and intellect, and is able to take care of itself.'”

Blue Kool-Aid DNA juice.

Spirited away to a bee farm, Jupiter is shocked to discover the detruciton of large metropolitan towers after an alien battle can be easily done and forgotten by the populace. The “aliens” have the ability to erase and implement memories, stultifying Jupiter into realizing that “large buildings can be detroyed and no one remembers.” In other words, the technocratic attack on neurology is such that massive false flags and terror events can be engineered and within a small amount of time, the public has forgetten or failed to grasp the signifiance of events like 9/11. The “Abrasax” Dynasty is an anagram for the gnostic deity Abraxas, which I’ve detailed before. In the analysis of Edge of Tomorrow I wrote:

“One of the chief archontic deities who relates to time is Abraxas, mentioned by St. Irenaeus of Lyon as a deity invoked by the gnostic Baslidians.  Wikipedia explains of Abraxas:

Abrasax, Abraxas.

In a great majority of instances the name Abrasax is associated with a singular composite figure, having a Chimera-like appearance somewhat resembling a basilisk or the Greek primordial god Chronos (not to be confused with the Greek titan Cronos). According to E. A. Wallis Budge, “as a Pantheus, i.e. All-God, he appears on the amulets with the head of a cock (Phoebus) or of a lion (Ra or Mithras), the body of a man, and his legs are serpents which terminate in scorpions, types of the Agathodaimon. In his right hand he grasps a club, or a flail, and in his left is a round or oval shield.” This form was also referred to as the Anguipede. Budge surmised that Abrasax was “a form of the Adam Kadmon of the Kabbalists and the Primal Man whom God made in His own image….

Scholar Hans Leisgang comments on these mysteries:

“According to mythical or mystery thinking, the gods and cosmic forces represented here are not conceived as merely existing successively or side by side: they act upon one another and within one another.  All are manifestations of a single god and of one and the same cosmos, which is the god himself with all the powers which he discharges but still encompasses; and these forces are the whole world with all its creatures and forms.” (“The Mysteries of the Serpent,” Papers From the Eranos Yearbook, pg. 211)”

Abraxas is also the IAO of the gnostics and Crowleyans, as I explained in “Egyptian Mysteries of God and Energy”:

“One of the best examples of this is the mythology of Isis, Apophis and Osiris, whose mythology includes the principles of life and energy itself.  Isis is the feminine principle of nature/energy extended in space and time.  Apophis represents the principle of destruction and entropy, and Osiris represents the reemergence of energetic loss towards eternity to a higher state of eternality and immortality.   The ancient Near Eastern symbol of IAO was representative of this formula, and when considered in comparison to the Pythagorean monad, dyad and triad, the same imagery is found to encode the same formulae.  The point or monad extends to the dyad, with the two points connected forming a line.  The line either has a circumference drawn around it and/or extends to a third point.  It can also form a vesica piscis, or an eye.”

Bees like Baebes.

Jupiter thus represents the rise of the feminine principle to become a new semi-immortal conqueror with the line of Caine, whose superior genetics are “recognized by even the bees.”  Bees are a classic esoteric symbol of both Masonry and their hierarchy as well as matriarchal royalty (the Queen bee).  Thus, it is not accidental the symbolic stand in here is that the “immortals” represent the royal bloodlines that have mastered the occult science of human manipulation and social engineering, while secreting away the real advanced technology – a similar theme in the film Elysium.  Cloning, life extension, artificial intelligence, etc., are withheld in their positive use, and for the public, turned to black op use. Within these glimmers of truth, the inverted gnostic mythos centers around panspermia – the ultimate “alien” myth promoted now by our so-called scientific pop stars like Dawkins.  The rest of the film is quite predictable, as Jupiter and Caine beat the bad guys, and she returns to her dingy day job, yet still remains queen of the earth.  In essence, the film constitutes the sci-fantasy of a disgruntled, feminist hausfrau: I give it three bags of popcorn and two tampons. Stupider Ascending.