Sunday, November 16, 2014

Nicki Minaj’s “Only” or How Rappers Give Tribute to Their Elite Overlords

Nov 13th, 2014 |http://vigilantcitizen.com/musicbusiness/nicki-minajs-video-rappers-giving-tribute-elite/
The lyric video of the song “Only” depicts Nicki Minaj as a dictator in a Nazi-like setting. Her acolytes Lil Wayne, Drake and Chris Brown represent various branches of the occult elite. Why would rappers want to glorify a regime that killed and oppressed millions – especially minorities? Because they are puppets of the elite – and the elite secretly loves oppressive dictatorships.
leadonly
Llyric videos are usually simple videos that display the lyrics of a song. Leave it to Nicki Minaj and her crew to turn a lyric video into an upsetting nod to violent dictatorships and a tribute to their elite overlords. After “channeling” the convicted child molester Roman Polanski with her “alter-ego” Roman Zolanski, Nicki Minaj now plays the role of literally Hitler. While some might say that the video is  “a way to tell yall that Young Money runs the rap game”‘, it is not. The only reason Young Money is getting major exposure is because its “artists” are actively pushing the elite’s Agenda (see my numerous articles on Nicki Minaj and Lil Wayne). It is also worth mentioning that the dictatorship emulated in that video sent millions of people to concentration camps and massacred most of them. And that only happened a few decades ago. Who would want to be associated with that? Nobody, except Illuminati pawns who are told what to do. The occult elite has always secretly approved of Nazi Germany’s ways (see how Operation Paperclip brought 1500 of Nazi workers to America). And, through the gradual denial of basic rights and freedoms combined with increased police state tactics, the elite is actively looking to steer America back into that direction. Nicki Minaj’s video is attempting to make that entire awfulness seem cool and sexy somehow.
Only is however not only World War II Germany. It is about today’s occult elite and its totalitarian tendencies. Each artist in the song portrays a “branch” of the elite – an “angle” from which they control the masses. Rap used to be about “fighting the power” – it is now about “serving the power”. For this reason, Nicki Minaj, Drake, Lil Wayne and Chris Brown are portrayed as heads of an oppressive, dictatorial and militaristic regime – which is where the elite wants to lead us.

Nicki Minaj : Charismatic Leader

All dictatorships need a charismatic leader that the ignorant masses will fear and idolize. This role is played by Minaj.
Minaj is standing in front a bunch of war planes and an antenna used to spread her propaganda.
Minaj is standing in front war planes about to wage war somewhere. Yes, apparently,war is now cool. An antenna used to spread her propaganda.
When Minaj says "Yo", the sound emits from the antenna and turns the world red. That's the role of propaganda from the political class to spread the agenda of the occult elite.
When Minaj says “Yo”, the sound emits from the antenna and turns the world red. This represents how politicians spread the propaganda of the elite that stays in the shadows.
This is a replica of the Brandenburg gate during Nazi Germany. Only difference, there's Minaj's big booty atop of it.
This is a replica of the Brandenburg gate during Nazi Germany. The only difference is that  we see the logo of Young Money on the banners instead of a swastika … and there’s Minaj’s surgically enlarged behind atop of it.
Nazi parade under Brandenburg Gate, 1930.
Nazi parade under Brandenburg Gate, 1930.
On each side of Minaj are dark cloaked figures. Who are they? Are they the shadowy elite secretly controlling the charismatic leader?
On each side of Minaj are dark cloaked figures. Are they the shadowy elite secretly controlling the charismatic leader?

Chris Brown – The Military

The elite relies on a high tech military might to invade countries and oppress its own people through a military police. Chris Brown plays the role of the General.
Chris Brown as a General standing in front of assault weapons.
Chris Brown as a General standing in front of assault weapons.
Notice that Chris Brown is wearing the uniform of an American general – hinting that the video is about a modern day dictatorship. It is about the occult elite looking to bring a New World Order. Other images point towards the same direction.
Images of modern missiles blasting off are shown while Chris Brown is singing. Why are we to bop our heads and dance while looking at images of military weaponry? That's some brainwashed propaganda material.
Images of modern missiles blasting off are shown while Chris Brown is singing. Are we that brainwashed that we’re expected to “groove” while watching missiles exploding?
We also see at several occasions images of CCTV cameras. High tech surveillance is an important part element of the NWO.
On several occasions, we see images of CCTV cameras filming you, the viewer. High tech surveillance is an important part element of the NWO.
There were no surveillance cameras during WWII. Showing CCTV cameras lets you know that it is all about the police state the elite is trying to bring about right now. In the past few years, there’s been a constant effort to show surveillance cameras in music videos to normalize their existence. They want you to stop noticing that Big Brother is watching you.

Drake – State Religion

Why is Drake, who is Jewish, taking part in a video that is greatly inspired by Nazi Germany? Is he aware that, if he lived in Germany during World War II, he’d be sent to a concentration camp to live in horrific conditions until his execution? Anyways, in the video, Drake is dressed as a Catholic priest but his “Church” is not about Christianity – it a State religion created by the dictatorship.

The logo of  YM is on the banner inside the Church (and on Drake's pope hat) indicating that this religion was created to serve the interests of the dictatorship.
The logo of YM is on the banner inside the Church (and on Drake’s pope hat) indicating that this religion was created to serve the interests of the dictatorship.
The book of Young Money. It is probably filled with terrible rap lyrics.
The book of Young Money. It is probably filled with terrible rap lyrics.

Lil Wayne – Mega-Corporations

Is there a more corporate looking person than Lil Wayne? The answer is : Yes, there is. Lil Wayne nevertheless represents mega-corporation who are owned by the world elite.
Lil Wayne in a power suit inside a boardroom about to make important business decisions.
Lil Wayne in a power suit inside a boardroom about to make important business decisions.
Mega-corporations are the “business branch” of the elite and have a say on international decisions (research corpoartion CEOs who attend Bilderberg and Trilateral Commission meetings). These corporations own the means of production of several industries and own nearly all media outlets.
YM logo on billboards - letting you know that the elite uses mass media to promote its dictatorship as if it was a product.
YM logo on billboards let you know that the elite uses mass media to promote its dictatorship as if it was a product.
Lil Wayne's face on TV lets you know that your TV shows and music videos are used to promote the dictatorship.
Lil Wayne’s face on TV : Movies, music videos and TV shows are used to promote the dictatorship.

In Conclusion

The lyric video of Only caused controversy due to its nod to Nazi Germany. But it goes further than that. It is about a modern day dictatorship, complete with high tech surveillance, advanced military weaponry and mass media propaganda. In short, it is about the various ways today’s elite is trying to bring about a totalitarian government to the world – the New World Order. Although the video makes the artists appear powerful and in control, they remain pawns, used to put an “attractive” face to the regime the elite is attempting to bring about.
Why would these artists accept to be associated with war, oppression, death, human suffering and militaristic madness? Because nobody asked for their political views, they do as they’re told. And that’s is what Young Money is truly about.


AGAINST ECONOMIC-FINANCIAL CHICKEN LITTLES    ~ until you 'factor' IN, the deep.Deep,DEEP ..beyond! the 'black' finance "system" ...the rest is ALL BS !!! READ !!!


Today I depart from my usual practice of selecting an article and commenting on it, so today is something of a critique, and I mean in it to share some thoughts I’ve been entertaining for some time.
By titling this article-editorial “Against Economic-Financial Chicken Littles,” I mean to address that trend in financial analysis that sees the financial sky falling any day now, and the collapse of the dollar. I am not, of course, a financial expert (nor, really, any other kind of expert). But for years – decades really, if we get right down to it – we’ve been hearing the analysts predicting “collapse,” hyper-inflation. The talk began, in my memory, when President Nixon took the USA off the Bretton-Woods agreement. We heard more of it during the Reagan era, as even his own budget manager David Stockton weighed in. We’ve been hearing it since the bailouts of 2008 and the popping of the housing bubble. And, of course, we’ve been hearing it since the Fed’s various “quantitative easing” schemes. On some models and predictions, we should have already seen hyperinflation (or, on other models, hyper-deflation). We’ve yet to see either.
And this to my mind constitutes a fundamental problem: the models by which analysts have been making their predictions are broken, and their assumptions are in need of revision. Some analysts look at gold or other bullion prices, others focus on the peak oil problem, others on growing population, others on the amount of American debt owned by other nations, and so on.. Other operate from economic models owing much to their origin in the industrial revolution and the depression-era of the last century. One need only think of the Keynesian or Austrian (Mises and von Hayek) schools. Yet other analysts focus on the dangers of “central banking”. Each of these, to my mind, reflects too narrow a data set on which to make any such macro-economic prediction. Indeed, by focusing their model only on the USA, rather than on the global picture, a skewed framework results. Do the liabilities exceed the assets in the case of the USA? Yes. But on a global scale, especially with new technologies coming on line? In my opinion, probably not.
They all, however, share one fundamental flaw, in my opinion, and it’s high time that financial analysts begin to incorporate this into their thinking, for this flaw could potentially be the reason their predictions – many of which were supposed to have happened already – like predictions of “the Rapture”, have failed. That flaw is that none of them take into consideration these three things, and their interrelationships: (1) the black budget, (2) the international underground criminal economy, largely drug based, and its associated money laundering and various schemes of mortgage fraud, and finally (3) the hidden system of finance that I have attempted to detail in my more recent books and talks (most notably in Covert Wars and Breakaway Civilizations), a system that had three enormous consequences for standard financial analyses of the types I’ve outlined above.
The first of these consequences was that it put the national security apparatus into banking, and international banking, directly. The second consequence was that because of the necessity to keep secret the enormous amounts of liquidity in the system that this covert mechanism (relying in part of captured Axis loot after the Second World War), the system began to deliberately obfuscate in dramatic fashion the estimated amounts of various types of bullion actually in existence. (How this could not be a factor in the analysis of those who watch the bullion markets like hawks for the slightest quiver in prices or amounts purchased, escapes me. For example, I recently saw an article where the Chinese want to purchase 10,000 tons of gold, which exceeds some estimates of the total bullion reserves by about 2,000 tons, yet, there was absolutely no comment on this conundrum by the analyst in question! The arithmetic here is simple: what if those figures are off by an order of magnitude or some large percentage of an order of magnitude?) This second point – a covert system utilizing Axis loot – is a matter of historical record, but I have yet to see any financial analyst refer to it in their models, and hence their predictions, as Catherine Fitts has so often suggested, are subject to having committed a material omission. Thirdly and finally, most of these analyses similarly ignore the signs and signals not only of massive rehypothecation of those hidden funds, but also the size, scale, and influence of underground criminal money flows related to the international drug trade, and so on.
So this is a plea: we need the financial expertise of these analysts; we need those analysts to pull their head out of the sand, and to begin to look at these things, to question their models, and to begin to take into their models, analyses, and considerations, the two huge missing pieces that seem to dog their predictions, these pieces being a truly global picture (and the role of technologies in that picture), and the huge size of black budget and hidden systems, and how these impact the public financial sector. This means they will have to shelve their favored economic dogmas – Keynesianism, Austrianism, bullionism, or any of the other favored ideologies – and look at some things that do not normally enter into the picture. We need to remember that these economic models were (1) the products of an historical era that is now long past, and (2) that they did not account for the rise of enormous “hidden states” with their black projects and black budgets during the Second World War, both in Nazi Germany, and in the USA, where that black projects world not only continued, but continues to this day. Untill they do, their analyses and predictions are simply not to be taken seriously.

Malaysian Airlines MH17 Downed by Ukrainian Military Aircraft. Kiev Regime False Flag

Selected Articles


mh17pilot1
At the APEC Summit in Beijing,  Australia’s Prime Minister Tony Abbott who is hosting this week’s G20 meetings in Brisbane, intimated in no uncertain terms, during a 15 minute encounter with Russian President Vladimir Putin that Moscow was responsible for the downing of Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 over Ukraine. 
During the meeting, Mr Abbott is reported to have stated that “Russia had armed the rebels who shot down the aircraft and killed 38 Australians.”  Mr Abbott said that  “MH17 was destroyed by a missile from a launcher that had come out of Russia, was fired from inside Eastern Ukraine and then returned to Russia… and that this ”was a very serious matter.”
Prime Minister Tony Abbott meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Beijing. Pic: A
Prime Minister Tony Abbott meets with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Beijing. Pic: AFP
Global Research has from the outset provided extensive coverage of the downing of MH17. The evidence and analysis not only dispels Prime Minister Abott’s accusations, it points unequivocally to a false flag attack instigated by the US-NATO supported Kiev regime, as well as a coverup by the Australian and Dutch investigators.

Lest we forget, the downing of MH17 was used as a pretext by Washington to impose economic sanctions on the Russian Federation.
The Western media and governments have gone to arms length to suppress and distort the evidence which points to the downing of MH17 not by a Buk missile but by a Ukrainian military aircraft.

Spanish Air Traffic Controller’s Twitter Report [translated from Spanish]
One of the first reports (in real time) pointing to the presence of two Ukrainian military aircraft  was revealed by the Spanish air traffic controller’s twitter messages on the day of the attacks. (emphasis added)
11:48 – 17 de jul. de 2014
The B777 plane flew escorted by Ukraine jet fighter until 2 minutes before disappearing from the radar,
11:54 – 17 de jul. de 2014
“If kiev authorities want to tell the truth, It´s gathered, 2 jet fighters flew very close minutes before, wasn’t downed by a fighter”
12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014
“Malaysia Airlines B777 plane just disappeared and Kiev military authority informed us of the downing, How they knew?”
12:00 – 17 de jul. de 2014
“7:00 minutes after [plane disappeared], the downing was notified, later our tower was taken with foreigner staff, they still here ”
12:01 – 17 de jul. de 2014
“all this is gathered in radars, to the unbelieving, shot down by kiev, here we know it and military air traffic control also”
13:15 – 17 de jul. de 2014
“Here the military commanders are in control and admit that the military could be following other orders , but no, the pro-Russian”
13:29 – 17 de jul. de 2014
“Interior Minister knew what the fighters were doing in the area, the defense minister didn’t.”
13:31 – 17 de jul. de 2014
“Military confirm It was Ukraine, but still does not know where the order came from”
The Spanish air-controller’s Twitter account was closed down by Twitter. This report from Kiev’s air traffic control was  dismissed by the mainstream media as “a conspiracy theory”. The audio records of communication between air traffic control and the plane were not made public.
Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing MH#17 bBy Global Research News, July 18, 2014
The Report of German Pilot Peter Haisenko
German pilot Peter Haisenko in a path-breaking analysis pointed to bullet like holes which could not have been triggered by a buk missile:
The cockpit shows traces of shelling! You can see the entry and exit holes. The edge of a portion of the holes is bent inwards. These are the smaller holes, round and clean, showing the entry points most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile.
Revelations of German Pilot: Shocking Analysis of the “Shooting Down” of Malaysian MH17. “Aircraft Was Not Hit by a Missile” By Peter Haisenko, September 09, 2014
The Suppressed BBC Report on Eyewitness Reports

The BBC  in an early report from Eastern Ukraine provided testimonies that MH17 was shot down by a military aircraft.  The BBC has censored its own news reporting. That BBC report including the video was removed by the BBC:
The inhabitants of the nearby villages are certain that they saw military aircraft in the sky shortly prior to the catastrophe. According to them, it actually was the jet fighters that brought down the Boeing.
The Ukrainian government rejects this version of events. They believe that the Boeing was shot down using a missile from a “BUK” complex that came in from Russia.
BBC reporter Olga Ivshina and producer Oksana Vozhdayeva decided to find the place from which the missile was allegedly launched.
Eyewitness #2: … And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it. Everybody saw it.
Eyewitness #1: Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.  
Original BBC Video Report: Preserved by Google Web-cache

[the web cache BBC report on Google has also been suppressed]

See Deleted BBC Report. “Ukrainian Fighter Jet Shot Down MHI7″, Donetsk Eyewitnesses By Global Research News, September 10, 2014
The Report of OSCE Monitor Michael Bociurkiw

OCSE monitor mentions bullet holes in MH17

Michael Bociurkiw,  head of the OSCE group of monitors confirmed in late July in a CBC TV interview (which has not been suppressed) points to machine gun holes in fuselage (pointing to a military aircraft rather than a missile). The byline of the CBC report was  ”OSCE monitor Michael Bociurkiw mentions bullet holes in #MH17, not able to find any missile so far” 
Original source http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/malaysia… – OSCE monitor Michael Bociurkiw mentions bullet holes in #MH17, not able to find any missile so far.
The Kiev Regime’s Official Report on the downing of MH17 
It is worth noting that one week after Michael Bociukiw’s statement, the Kiev regime released its official report (August 7) on the downing of  MH17  drafted by Ukraine’s intelligence bureau, The Security Service of Ukraine (SBU). This report, which borders on the absurd, has barely been acknowledged by the mainstream media.
According to the SBU report entitled Terrorists and Militants planned cynical terrorist attack at Aeroflot civil aircraft , the Donetsk militia (with the support of Moscow) was aiming at a Russian Aeroflot passenger plane and shot down the Malaysian MH17 airliner by mistake. That’s the official Ukraine government story which has not been reported by the MSM, nor mentioned “officially” by Western governments.
According to the Kiev regime, the Donetsk militia did not intend to shoot down Malaysian airlines MH17. What the “pro-Russian rebels” were aiming at was a Russian Aeroflot passenger plane. The MH17 was shot down “by mistake” according to an official statement by the head of Ukraine’s Secret Service, Valentine Nalyvaichenko (Ukraine News Service, August 7, 2014)
According to SBU Chief Nalyvaichenko who casually accuses the Russian government of planning to shoot down a Russian Aeroflot flight:
“Ukraine’s law enforcement and intelligence agencies have established during the investigation into a terrorist attack on the Boeing… that on that day, July 17, and at that time military mercenaries and terrorists from the Russian Federation planned to carry out a terrorist attack against a passenger aircraft of Aeroflot en route from Moscow to Larnaca… as a pretext for the further invasion by Russia,”
This cynical terrorist attack was planned for the day when the [Malaysia Airlines] plane happened to fly by, planned by war criminals as a pretext for the further military invasion by the Russian Federation, that is, there would be a casus belli,” he added.
Thus, according Nalyvaichenko, the terrorists downed the Malaysian airliner by mistake.” (Ukraine Interfax News, August 8, 2014)
Nalyvaichenko said that the Kiev government reached this conclusion “in the course of its own investigation into the downing of MH17″.
According to Britain’s foremost news tabloid, The Mail on Sunday, quoting the head of Ukraine intelligence, the insidious design of the pro-Russian rebels (supported by Moscow) was to shoot down a Russian commercial airline plane, with a view to blaming the Ukrainian government. The objective of this alleged “false flag” covert op was to create a justifiable and credible pretext for Vladimir Putin to declare war on Ukraine.
Desperate MH17 “Intelligence” Spin. Ukraine Secret Service Contends that “Pro-Russian Rebels had Targeted a Russian Passenger Plane”. “But Shot Down Flight MH17 by Mistake”By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, November 06, 2014
SELECTED ARTICLES
Below is a selection of key articles which dispels the media lies and official government fabrications to the  effect that the Donbass militia supported by Moscow was behind the attack on Malaysian airlines MH17. 

At no juncture during the Ukrainian crisis could the downing of flight MH17 have been more convenient for NATO and its proxy regime in Kiev. Kiev’s forces in eastern Ukraine are being repealed. NATO’s attempts to bait Russia into moving into Ukrainian territory have failed.
Dutch MH17 Investigation Omits US “Intel”. Fabrications and Omissions Supportive of US-NATO Agenda Directed against Russia By Tony Cartalucci, September 19, 2014
MH17 Verdict: Real Evidence Points to US-Kiev Cover-up of Failed “False Flag” By 21st Century Wire, September 14, 201
Report by Dutch Investigators of MH17 Crash Dispels Notion about Missile Attack. Michel Chossudovsky By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, September 11, 2014
Spanish Air Controller @ Kiev Borispol Airport: Ukraine Military Shot Down Boeing MH#17 By Global Research News, July 18, 2014
Dutch Safety Board (DSB) Report: Malaysian MH17 was Brought Down by “A Large Number of High Energy Objects”, Contradicts US Claims that it Was Shot Down by a “Russian Missile” By Prof Michel Chossudovsky and Julie Lévesque, September 09, 2014
“Support MH17 Truth”: OSCE Monitors Identify “Shrapnel and Machine Gun-Like Holes” indicating Shelling. No Evidence of a Missile Attack. Shot Down by a Military Aircraft? By Prof Michel Chossudovsky, September 09, 2014
Camouflage and Coverup: The Dutch Commission Report on the Malaysian MH17 Crash is “Not Worth the Paper it’s Written On”By Peter Haisenko, September 11, 2014