We bring to the consideration of our readers this incisive
and carefully formulated analysis by Canada’s renowned philosopher
Professor John McMurtry.
The complete text published by
the Journal of 9/11 Studies can be downloaded in pdf
* * *
I was sceptical of the 9-11 event from the first time I saw it on
television. It was on every major network within minutes. All the
guilty partieswere declared before any evidence was shown.The first
questions of any criminal investigation were erased. Who had the most
compelling motives for the event? Who had the means to turn two central
iconic buildings in New York into a pile of steel and a cloud of dust in
seconds?[i]
Other questions soon arose in the aftermath. Why was all the evidence at the crime scenes removed or confiscated?
Who was behind the continuous false information and non-stop
repetition of “foreign/Arab terrorists”when no proof of guilt existed?
Who was blocking all independent inquiry?
Even 11 years on these questions are still not answered.
But those immediately named guilty without any forensic proof
certainly fitted the need for a plausible Enemy now that the “threat of
the Soviet Union” and “communist world rule” were dead. How else could
the billion-dollar-a-day military be justified with no peace dividend
amidst a corporately hollowed-out U.S. economy entering its long-term
slide? While all the media and most of the people asserted the official
9-11 conspiracy theory as given fact, not all did.
A Bay Street broker with whom I was improbably discussing the event
in Cuba had no problem recognising the value meaning. When I asked what
he thought about the official conspiracy theory, he was frank:
“You can call it what you want, but America needs a war to pull the
people together and expand into new resource rich areas. That what it
has always done from Mexico on. And that is what it needs now”. When I
wondered why none in the know said so, he smirked: “It would be
impolite”, adding, “It affects the entire future prosperity of America
and the West”. And all the deaths? “It had to be done –far less than it
could have been”. The 19 Arabs with box-cutters reducing the World Trade
Center buildings to powder in a few seconds?He shrugged.
Thus everyone since 9-11 is prohibited nail-clippers on planes to
confirm the absurd – including 15 of the 19alleged hijackers being from
Saudi Arabia and several apparently still alive after crashing the
planes into the buildings.
[ii]As
for the diabolical mastermind Osama bin Laden, he is never linked by
credible evidence to the crime and never claims responsibility for the
strike since the videos of him are fakes. “Ground Zero” is a double
entendre. All doubts are erased apriori.
Decoding the U.S. Theater of Wars and the Moral Driver Behind
One already knew that suspension of belief is the first act of
fiction, and that instant culture rules the U.S. One already knew that
monster technical events are America’s stock in trade. And one already
knew the long history of false U.S. pretexts for war – so well
established that a young strategic thinker a decade after 9-11 advises
the right-wing Washington Policy Institute on how to create a crisis by
deadly planned incident to make war on Iran – “it is the traditional way
of getting into war for what is best in America’s interests”.
[iii]
One
further knew from past research that the U.S.’s strategic leadership
since 1945 had been Nazi-based in information and connections and the
dominant Central-European figures articulating it ever after across
Democrat and Republican lineshave a common cause. For over 40 years,
Henry Kissinger as Republican and Zbigniew Brzezinski as Democrat have
been protégés of David Rockefeller, selected as Trilateral Commission
and Bilderberg Group leaders, and capable of any mass-homicidal plan to
advance “U.S. interests”. The banker-and-oil imperial line through David
Rockefeller as paradigm case goes back to the Nazi period to John
Foster Dulles (an in-law) and his brother Allen Dulles (OSS and then CIA
Director), who Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg called “traitors”
for their support of the Nazi regime. The Rockefeller Foundation funded
and developed German eugenics programs in the pre-war years, Standard
Oil supplied oil in collaboration with I.G. Farben, and so on.
[iv]
The supreme moral goal and strategic methods governing U.S.
covert-state performance have not only have been very similar in moral
principle, but have deeply connected Rockefeller protégés Kissinger and
Brzezinski, and more deeply still the theoretical godfather of U.S.
covert state policy, Leo Strauss, who was funded out of Germany by David
Rockefeller from the start.
The inner logic of covert and not-so-covert U.S. corporate world rule
since 1945unified under Wall Street financial management and
transnational corporate treaties for unhindered control of commodities
and money capital flows across all borders is undeniable if seldom
tracked. This architecture of the grand plan for a New World Order is
evident in both strategic policy and global political and armed action
over decades that have seen the objectives increasingly fulfilled with
constructed deadly crises as pretexts for war the standard technique.
[v]Behind
them as first post-Nazi historical turn lies the 1947 National Security
Act (NSA) which created the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)and
explicitly licensesdestruction of life, truth and other societies as
institutional methods.
The CIA is charged with designing, planning and executing
“propaganda, economic war, direct preventive action, sabotage,
anti-sabotage, destruction, subversion against hostile States,
assistance to clandestine liberation movements, guerrilla murders,
assistance to indigenous groups opposed to the enemy countries of the
free world”. The linkage back to Nazi methods and world-rule goal as the
highest moral objective is not just one of corresponding ultimate
principles and strategic policy formation. It relied on Nazi SS
intelligence sources and means from the beginning of the covert terror
state.
[vi]
There is no heinous means that is not assumed as the highest morality
by this long-standing covert institutional formation linking to the
presidential office.It is an explicitly secret system involving at least
the Defense Department and the CIA, the former with many more
operatives and offices.
The Special Activities Division (SAD) to carry out NSA criminal
operations, for example, also confers the highest honors awarded in
recognition of distinguished valor and excellence – as did the earlier
SS prototype in Germany. What people find difficult to recognise is that
these actions, whether by the SAD or other system operations,are
conceived as the highest duty, however life-system destructive and mass
murderous they are. All participants are super patriots in their own
view, as were the Nazis. Contradiction between declared and actual
values, however, is a central mode of the covert system. For example,
what can be considered a high duty in the perpetual U.S.“war on drugs”,
the most morally obligatory commitment of the U.S. state,is at the same
time a war against and with other drug operations to transport illegal
hard drugs into the U.S. itself.
[vii]
We might see here a parallel between foreign mass murder and domestic
mass murder in 9-11, with both regarded as high patriotism in this
supreme morality. In the background of America’s Reichstag Fire and
likewise disclosing the unlimited geo-strategic action that can be
operationalized as necessary and good, the post-1945 U.S. control of
international sea-lanes made the covert U.S. state the world’s dominant
narcotics controller so as to fund secret criminal war actions from
South-East Asia to Latin America, entailing the addiction of its own
peoples.
[viii]This
woeful method has been long known by experts, but came to be public
knowledge in the Reagan-state funding of the death-squad Contras of
Nicaragua as “the moral equal of our Founding Fathers” (a tribute he is
said to have given later to the drug-running warlords and jihadists of
Afghanistan).
These moral contradictions seem insane, but this is so only if one
does not comprehend the underlying supreme morality of which they are
all expressions.
Even U.S.-sponsored death squads torturing and killing tens of
thousands of poor people across Latin America before 2000 and their
return as direct covert U.S.-state method from Iraq to Syria after 9-11 –
called “the Salvador option”
[ix]
– is regarded as necessary and obligatory to “defend the Free World and
our way of life”. They entail ever more total U.S. world rule and
self-maximizing position by strategic deduction from the supreme
morality’s first premises.
The covert nature of the mass-murderous operationalization is never
from moral embarrassment. It is solely to ensure effectiveness of
execution against “soft” and “uninformed” public opinion, to terrorize
people in situ from continued resistance, and to annihilate its
leadership and community agency all the way down. Throughout the
deciding moments of execution of the underlying supreme value program,
global corporate money demand multiplication is always the ultimate
value driver -as may be tested by seeking any covert U.S. action or
overt war which is not so regulated beneath saturating propaganda of
lawful intentions of peace and freedom.
These lines of underlying moral institution, policy, strategic plan,
and massive life destruction at every level are indisputable facts of
the covert and official faces of the U.S. state, but are typically not
connected to the September 11, 2001 attack. Since most people cannot
believe their own government or the “leader of the free world” could
execute such a sabotage action as “9-11” in which thousands of American
themselves died, these behavioral reminders forge the unifying meaning.
Worse still occurred in the last “war”before 9-11. In the background
providing graphic example of how the covert U.S. state apparatus is
structured to attack and murder U.S. citizens themselves to
strategically maximize implementation of its supreme value program of
transnational corporate money sequences over all barriers, there is the
now known Operation Northwoods. Very familiar to the 9-11 truth
movement, but unpublicized since its release under freedom of
information laws, this Department of Defense and Joint Chiefs of Staff
plan proposed that the CIA and other operatives covert operatives
“undertake a range of atrocities” to be blamed on Cuba to provide
pretext for invasion.
“Innocent civilians were to be shot on American streets;
boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba were to be sunk on the high seas; a
wave of violent terrorism was to be launched in Washington DC, Miami
and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did commit;
planes would be hijacked”.[x]
All would be blamed on Castro the Communist in place of bin Laden the
Islamicist, and invasion of desired resistant territory would be
achieved as a triumph of American freedom and interests over its
enemies.
Operation
Northwoods was not, however, okayed by President Kennedy – perhaps
another reason for his assassination and replacement by more pliant
presidents to represent “America’s interests” in accord with the supreme
morality. Underneath the stolen election of George Bush Jr.in contrast –
whose family made its money, in part, by serving the covert financial
requirements of the Nazi regime before and during the 1939-45 War – was a
domestic and foreign administration which would push further than any
in the past to advance “U.S. interests”to full-spectrum world rule. Its
project included reversing the Roosevelt New Deal and the social state
within the U.S. itself – “an anomaly” as Bush Jr. expressed the
historical perspective and ethic at work.
This
plan was more explicit in the published Project for the New American
Century formed from 1997 on. It even supplied the need for a 9-11 event
in its 2000 version, the year that Bush Jr. was elected and the year
before 9-11. To indicate the “non-partisan” nature of the planning,
Democrat National security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski had already
hinted at the usefulness of a 9-11-style domestic attack to move policy
forward in his 1998 book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its
Geostrategic Imperatives.
[xi]
The Moral Compass of 9-11
As a moral philosopher with
social value systems as my primary object of analysis,
my first thoughts in understanding “9-11” were of the system
motives,known methods, and objective interests driving the event which
could coherently
explain it. Whatever the immediate
hold of the official conspiracy theory on the public mind,a rational
explanation is required which is consistent with the suppressed facts
and the organising geo-strategic plan on both sides of the event.
For over a decade before 9-11, there were three U.S.-propelled global
trends that almost never come into the understanding of 9-11 itself.
9-11 truth seekers themselves have focused on the foreground technics
and the transparent motive for oil. But these are undergirded by deeper
sea-shifts of geopolitical and economic wars of seizure and destruction
by other name against which the world’s people were rising. To compel
books of analysis into one unifying frame, transnational
corporate-rights treaties from NAFTA to the Maastracht Treaty to the WTO
overrode all other rights across borders;the private
“financialization”stripping of social sectors and welfare states had
advanced across the world; and the totalizing movement of the system
across all former “cold war” and cultural borders was “the new world
order” in formation. Together these vast shifts towards transnational
money-sequence rule of all reversed centuries of democratic evolution.
And every step of the supreme value program was life blind at every step
of its global operationalization.
[xii]
Yet states and cultures were so sweepingly re-set into unaccountable
transnational corporate and bank rule that few recognised the absolutist
value program being imposed on the world. Fewer still recognised all
was unfolding according to plan.
What has been least appreciated about the long-term strategic plan
unfolding on both sides of what was immediately called “9-11” –
CallEmergency!–is that supreme banker and global money director David
Rockefeller had summarized “the plan” to fellow money-party elites
across borders at the Bildersberg meeting in Baden Baden Germany in June
1991 -exactly at the same time that the Soviet Union and its resistant
barriers fell.
[xiii]
Bear in mind that Rockefeller among other initiatives appointed both
Kissinger and Brzezinski for the lead in both the supranational
Bilderberg and Trilateral strategic bodies of which he was the lead
patron, not to mention financed the unemployed academic Leo Strauss out
of Germany to be the godfather “philosopher” of the “new world order”.
Rockefeller speaks very precisely to his fellow “elite of the elite” of
the Western world where only Americans and Europe are invited and
reportage excluded:
“A supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and bankers is
surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries”, Rockefeller said.
[xiv]
Observe the foundational new concepts in place of responsible
government and democratic accountability. They are now consigned to
“past centuries”. A “
supranational sovereignty”has replaced
them and is morally“preferable”. Rockefeller is not exaggerating. By
1991 a “supranational sovereignty” had already developed in the form of
transnational treaties conferring override rights of “profit
opportunity” on transnational corporations and private bank rule of
government finances across borders – procedurally trumping any elected
legislatures and their laws which are inconsistent with their thousands
of treaty articles, even when the system eventually leads to world
depression as now.
[xv] The source of the legitimacy of governments, ultimate
sovereignty,
has now passed as preferable to “an intellectual elite and bankers”:
more exactly, academic strategy servants and transnational money
sequences overriding all human and planetary life requirements a-priori
by the supreme moral goal.
Ask which function of the world’s people and means of life is not now
in debt to Wall Street and the private global banking system it leads.
Ask which means of life from food and water to autos and pension cheques
is not thus ultimately controlled, or which commodity is not under
oligopolist corporate sway. The “surely preferable” objective was
already achieved by 1991 or in advanced global institutional motion. Now
supreme over all else so that all else is now accountable to it, and it
is not accountable to anything above it, “the plan”seemed all but
accomplished by Rockefeller’s own considered words.
But
what if people resist the new world rule with no life coordinate or
constraint at any level of its execution? We may recall that during the
death-squad rule of the Argentina generals at this time in which
civilians were murdered and tortured in the thousands, National Security
Adviser Kissinger congratulated the junta on their “very good results –
- The quicker you succeed the better.”Kissinger also heartily approved
of the earlier massacres and torture in Chile.
The resistance was in this way pre-empted long before the Soviet
Union fell, and after 1990 had no block in the Middle East and Central
Asia either. “The plan” has been very long term. Kissinger the
geo-executer was originally appointed to high office by Rockefeller (to
lead the Council on Foreign Relations back in 1954), and – to give a
sense of the long-range trajectory of the plan design
–was,incredibly,the U.S. administration’s first choice for an
“independent 9-11 Commission”. The obviously not-independent Kissinger
was still not a problem for “the free press” and official discourse. But
when he was required to disclose his business connections, he withdrew
to stay covert in his ongoing backroom capacities and enrichment.
The 9-11 sacrifice is better understood within the deep-structural
context of the unfolding plan. Thus David Rockefeller gave special
thanks to media like “the
New York Times, Washington Post, Time Magazine and
other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and
respected their promises of discretion” in co-operating with the plan.
Rockefeller was again precise:
This plan for the world would have been impossible for us to
develop if we had been subjected to the light of publicity during those
years.
[xvi]
The
plan’s next decisive steps were in fact already in motion as
Rockefeller expressed gratitude for the media black-out. A new strategic
manifesto from the Pentagon was in preparation entitled “Defense
Planning Guidance on Post-Cold- War Strategy,” completed on February 18,
1992.
[xvii]Prepared under the supervision of
Paul Wolfowitz, then the Pentagon’s Undersecretary for Policy, it was disclosed in March of 1992 by the
New York Times.After
the first invasion of Iraq, it became known as the Project for the New
American Century, publicly released from 1997 to 2000 prior to 9-11.
Again we may note the long arc of planning control, crisis and war as
required. Item 6 of the strategic plan defined the agenda in general
terms: “In the Middle East and Southwest Asia, our overall objective is
to remain the predominant power in the region and preserve U.S. and
western access to the region’s oil.”
Oil-rich Iraq had in fact been invaded – not only to privatize its
peerlessly high-quality surface oilfields but to destroy its
region-leading socialist infrastructure.Iraq became accessible for
invasion as the arms-bankrupted Soviet Union was in collapse. We may
observe that the covertly genocidal destruction of Iraq bridged
Republican and Democrat administrations over three changes of government
– disclosing how the covert state operates as a moral constant across
party fronts.
The actions confirm and express the one supreme moral goal identified
above. They bridge from Saddam himself as CIA-payroll killer and war
proxy against Iran to recapture lost Iran oilfields dating from 1980 to
1988 to the fall of the USSR in 1991 as the axis of the long-term
strategic plan of global turnaround to “America’s century” still to come
before and after 9-11.But between 1990 and 2003 Saddam was transmuted
from former ally to aggressor against Kuwait in an invasion given an
official green light from the U.S. government, to “mushroom cloud”threat
with invented “weapons of mass destruction”.
In fact, National Security Adviser Wolfowitz explained after the
invasion found nothing of the kind: “[We had] virtually no economic
options with Iraq because the country floats on a sea of oil.”
Observe how the invasion is conceived as obligatory for a reason that
expresses the supreme value goal. Observe that it occurs less than two
years after 9-11, which gave the open-cheque justification for the
bombing and occupation which allowed the expropriation of Iraq’s
society’s oil resources.
The problem was not the evil Saddam or the “weapons of mass destruction”, the standard reverse projection.
[xviii]The problem was the Iraqi people themselves and their developed oil-funded social life infrastructure
between
the supreme oil-fields and their U.S. corporate control and
privatization. 9-11 was,thus, first the justification for invading
Afghanistan – to clear the way for pipelines into the former Soviet
republics from the Caspian Sea region– pipelines that prompted the U.S.
representative to predictively warn the Taliban:“Either you accept our
offer of a
carpet of gold, or we bury you under a
carpet of bombs.”[xix]9-11 was then the necessary basis of justification for the bombing of Baghdad for the unifying supreme objective.
In fact,seldom published in the corporate media keeping the glare of
publicity away from the supreme moral objective, the publicly owned and
managed oil revenues of Iraq had been invested since the 1950’s in
Iraq’s advanced social infrastructure, leading the Middle East with free
higher education, high health standards, and near universal livelihood
security. The world’s oldest civilisation was robust in organisational
capacities long before the CIA-asset Saddam was installed.
Despite his murdering his way to the top in this function, even
Saddam could not destroy the system because socialist government had
been achieved decades earlier by a powerful oil-workers’ union base and a
population glad to have all education free, an efficient low-cost foods
delivery system, and the most advanced public healthcare system in the
Middle East. So there was not only the “sea of oil” as a motive to
assert U.S. control in the new “supranational sovereignty” of the world.
Just as important in this ultimate moral cause, what the U.S. covert
state always seeks to destroy by any means, isa successful social
infrastructure without private big oil, bankers and transnational
corporations free to control it towards higher profit opportunities.
Unravelling the Supreme Moral Doctrine behind the U.S. Covert State
The genocide of Iraq, as the long-opposing “evil empire” was in
free-fall, is the most important strategic anchoring prior to “9-11”.
Covert strategic policy to forward the supreme goal is by now
self-evident, but the inner moral logic is assumed not penetrated. The
most influential of Rockefeller’s protégés in this regard is the
“philosopher king” of the U.S. covert state,
Leo Strauss.
While he never worked in a philosophy department or has any training in
logic, his concept of “natural right” fits exactly to the
“supranational sovereignty” of private money-sequence rule of the world –
what “the intellectual elite” Rockefeller refers to invoke as “moral
anchor”, “right” and “justice”.
The moral thought system is not unlike that of
Mein Kampf without the racist rant, camouflaged everywhere in practice by the method of big lies – “noble lies” as Strauss exalts them.
[xx]
The innermost value driver is a perpetual war of dispossession of the
weaker for the private transnational money-capital multiplication of the
rich.
Nothing in this doctrine is too mendacious, greed-crazed and
murderous if it fulfills the plan of this limitless private-capital rule
as ultimate moral ground and compass. In Strauss’s canonical
teaching of U.S. national security advisers and intellectual following,
the ruling moral absolute is expressed by the core master idea behind
the “supranational sovereignty” of an “intellectual elite and bankers”:
“limitless capital accumulation – — the highest right and moral duty”.[xxi]
This is the ethical absolute of the covert U.S. state and its strategic decision structure. And there is
no internal
limit within this moral universe to life means seizure from poorer
societies and resource looting for the supreme goal. It is the natural
and absolute Good.
To justify its meaning, the Straussian canon adopts a potted reading
of Western moral and political philosophy from Plato through Hobbes,
Hegel, Nietzsche, Marx and Weber. This impresses American political
operatives of the faith, but Strauss is a failed philosopher turned down
by Paul Tillich for his post-doctoral
Habilitation and only
saved from academic ruin in Germany by Rockefeller grant money. While
not taken seriously as philosophy anywhere else, it is worth decoding
its talmudic involution for the borrowed ideas that drive its covert
state disciples and neo-fascist public “intellectuals” in America.
The ultimately organising idea is to commend
all forms of conquering and limitlessly expanding private capital as “natural right and law”
with genocidal subjugations justified in glowing moral terms. For
example, “noble lies” is the moral category for limitless mendacity. One
may wonder how educated people can be so bent out of moral shape. So I
now concisely provide what cannot be found elsewhere: the inner logic of
the supreme doctrine as perversions of great thinkers.
Its framework of meaning and value helps us to understand why the
9-11 event could easily follow for the managers of the covert U.S. state
and its Straussian planners as not at all anomalous or evil within
their moral logic. 9-11 follows as a maximally rational and unique tool
to achieve the objectives in fact achieved by 9-11, and the
geo-strategic cabal behind it is servilely linked from the beginning to
the dominant private transnational corporate and banking interests
exemplified by David Rockefeller.
To understand this brutal moral universe and its connection to 9-11,
the 9-11 wars and a globalizing police state, we need to understand the
deformations of its basic organising ideas. Plato’s idea of “the noble
lie” means, in fact, a myth or parable to communicate an underlying
truth about the triadic human soul of reason, spirit and appetite which,
Plato argues, should be reflected in the construction of the ideal
state (in which the rulers are communist in their common property to
keep them uncorrupted and true).
But through the prism of U.S. global money-party rule a la Strauss
this idea becomes the principle of lying to the public to keep the
vulgar herd – the people themselves – ignorant and obedient. The
philosophies of Hobbes and Hegel are also grist for this mill. Hobbes
argues that “man is moved by a restless desire for power after power
that ceaseth only in death”, but this brute desire in the “State of
Nature” is tamed by “the covenant of peace” ordered by the internal
sovereign as absolute.
Via Strauss and the U.S. covert state this becomes right is might and
the ultimate “natural right” is limitless private capital power and
empire with no end of totalization across the peoples and lands of the
world. Hegel too suits a fascist-capitalist reading since he argues “the
State is the march of God through the world”, and war itself is
history’s test of which State is a higher realisation of “the absolute
Idea”. But Hegel still envisaged a “universal state”to supersede the
competitive private-property division of capitalism in the
“universalization of right and law on earth”.
Once again U.S. private money-capital power with no bound, the
supreme moral goal in the Rockefeller-Strauss doctrine, is opposite to
the classical philosophy it invokes. Once more dialectical development
of reason to more coherently inclusive conception and life is reversed
into one-way private money capital sequences maximized to rule the world
with the U.S. military as its instrument of force and terror.
However it conceals its meaning, all positions come down to this
underlying value code – as may be tested on whatever transnational
money-sequence demand, right or war is launched next. 9-11 construction
in such a moral world does not violate this value code. It expresses it
in self-maximizing strategic turn to achieve the ultimate goal.
Friedrich Nietzsche may provide the best fodder for the doctrine when
he advises that “life is essentially appropriation, injury,
overpowering of what is alien and weaker, imposing of one’s own forms,
and at its mildest exploitation” in his superman vision of “beyond good
and evil”. For philosophical Nietzscheans, this is code for the inner
meaning of the angst of artistic creation. But this meaning is
predictably lost on the U.S. covert-state school seeking the
“supranational sovereignty” of “limitless capital accumulation” as the
supreme good with the “intellectual elite” as servants to
it.
Karl Marx’s link of capitalism’s success to productive force development
is the ultimate equivocation upon which this ruling doctrine depends –
making no distinction between productive capital providing life goods
and unproductive money sequencing hollowing out the world by
money-capital multiplication. Marx, it must be acknowledged, did not
made the distinction himself since this mutation of capital came a
century after his death.
[xxii]
Finally Max Weber’s
Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism
does not ground this doctrine of “limitless capital accumulation as the
highest right and duty” with the state to serve it, as Strauss again
torturously suggests. In fact, Weber deplores any such perversion of
public authority. His capitalist model is a young Benjamin Franklin
speaking of money saved and invested as like having “a breeding sow”,
not a transnational money-sequence juggernaut of eco-genocidal
expansion. Revealingly, Benjamin Franklin and “the protestant ethic” in
general were most concerned about
non-waste, which Strauss
explicitly excludes from the meaning of “limitless capital
accumulation”. For Leo Strauss and his U.S. “national security”
disciples, the capitalist may waste as much as he wants by “natural
right”.
Further, in complete inversion of source, the greed worship of the
U.S. state, its patrons and its academy disciples reverses the model of
the “spirit of capitalism” exemplified by Benjamin Franklin in
proprietary claim on knowledge and inventions. He,in fact,refused to
patent his famous Franklin Stove because he believed that no innovation
or new knowledge from which other people could benefit should be denied
them – just as he himself had benefitted from the community of knowledge
and science as the distinguishing feature of being a civilised human
being.
In short, it is important to recognise how twisted the covertly
ruling doctrine is. No element of it is life coherent or true to the
classical thinkers in which it costumes itself. In the end, only the
transnational U.S. money party has any place in its rights and
obligations, and any sacrifice of other life to its supreme goal is
legitimate – linking back to the Nazi-U.S. corporate axis that nearly
destroyed the civilised world once before.
[xxiii]
Money-Capital Power UeberAlles: How Economic Rationality Leads the Plan
The U.S. culture of money-sequence “rationality” is the underlying
intellectual and moral disorder which leads to “limitless money capital
accumulation” as the supreme moral goal. In formal terms,
the equation of rationality to atomic self-maximization is assumed a-prioriacross
domains. With globalizing Wall-Street-led “financialization”, this
“rationality” becomes equated to private money-sequence multiplication
across all borders as the ultimate Good. This is the innermost mutation
of value logic and goal, the moral DNA, from which the cancerous world
system develops on both sides of 9-11.
[xxiv]
This first principle itself is,in fact,built into formal economics,
decision and game theory, and strategic science, as I explain step by
step in “Behind Global System Collapse: The Life-Blind Structure of
Economic Rationality.”
[xxv]
It is axiomatic but unexamined, life-blindly absolutist but not
recognised as morally problematic. To make a long story short,
competitive self-maximization in the market is assumed to produce “the
best of possible worlds” by mathematical proof. “Pareto efficiency” is
believed to demonstrate this by private money exchanges between
self-maximizing atoms apriori stripped of all life properties,
relations, society, conditions of choice, and all natural and civil life
support systems. Pareto himself recognised outside this formula what
has since been covered up.
Not only is the formula consistent with most having remaining
impoverished by the “optimum” of “no-one worse off”, what none who cite
“Pareto efficiency” as a standard academic mantra ever acknowledge or
even recognise. Pareto himself is in no doubt of the implication. As the
fascist party he belongs to rules Italy and Rockefeller creates the
Council of Foreign Relations, he asserts with approval: “Very moral
civilized people have destroyed and continue to destroy, without the
least scruple, savage or barbarian peoples”.
[xxvi]We glimpse here at the roots the supreme morality built into “economic science” itself.
Yet, as demonstrated in “Behind Global System Collapse”, even the most liberal canons of America, including John Rawls’ classic
A Theory of Justice, are grounded in the same meta principle.
[xxvii] Rationality and value are
equated to
self-maximizing gain with no limit within game-theoretic interactions
as the sole limiting framework of “limitless money capital acquisition”.
The generic equation defines, indeed, the dominant intellectual and
economic mind-set of America and the global system
in action
since 1980. The cabal internal to U.S. national security strategic
planning follows the moral logic to its most radical conclusions with no
constraints by life or law.
The one absolute moral meaning is the spread of U.S. economic,
military and political power as good for all, or, more exactly in
Straussian language,
limitless private transnational money-capital expansion as the highest right and moral duty. Only
what is consistent with or serves this supreme morality, it follows,
deserves to exist. This is the alpha and omega of the covert doctrine
and state, and careful reading can find no disconfirmation beneath the
rhetoric of “noble lies”.
The Iraq Paradigm: Genocide Strategy From 1990 On
The Iraq line of the geostrategic plan from 1990 to 2001 and after is
a paradigmatic articulation of the covertly ruling moral logic. It
launches into the theatre of war as direct war attack when U.S.
Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, is instructed to green-light Saddam’s
already known plan to invade Kuwait in 1990: “The US. has no opinion on
your Arab-Arab conflicts, such as your dispute with Kuwait”, she
advises. To formalize the lie as official and traditional, she reports:
“Secretary Baker has directed me to emphasize the instruction, first
given to Iraq in the 1960s, that the Kuwait issue is not associated with
America”.
[xxviii]
The
dispute was, in fact, over Kuwait’s drawing out oil from reserves
underlying Iraq as enabled by the colonial split of the oil-rich Kuwait
province from Iraq – the classic divide-and-rule policy holding also in
the division of oil-rich Kurdistan among four manufactured states.
Saddam had good reason to trust the U.S., not only by the long-term
official promise of neutrality but as blood-mix ally when he waged a
U.S.-supported war of aggression against Iran – which still remains the
target. Note the big lie to provoke the supreme crime of war has
remained without any glare of publicity that might derail the plan.
When Saddam did exactly as planned by invading Kuwait, Bush Sr. raved
about the Nazi-like aggression against a weaker country in the reverse
projection that always defines the covert U.S. state before, through and
after 9-11. So in the same name of “preventing aggression” U.S.
“defense” forces invaded Iraq to destroy any life capacity it had to
defend itself – always the strategy since the defeat in Vietnam. The
genocide began by the massacre of many tens of thousands of fleeing
soldiers. Recall the weeping young woman, the Kuwait ambassador’s
daughter, planted next to baby incubators falsely claiming the monster
Saddam had murdered the babies. This reverse projection was soon to be
made real thousands of times over inside the victim society of Iraq.
Reverse projection of evil is the meta law of U.S. psy-ops propaganda
in the deadly conflicts and wars it covertly starts. This is the
supreme moral program in action as “noble lies”. In this case, the
air-bombing
after surrender continued from U.S. and “special
ally” Britain as “sanctions of Iraq” to “prevent aggression” – again the
reverse projection. In fact the bombs continually fell on the water and
electricity infrastructures of the defenceless people and against all
lines of repair to restore either – “the line in the sand against Iraq
aggression”. We might bear in mind that Wolfowitz was Undersecretary of
Defense under Secretary Cheney at this time, their positions not unlike
those at the time of 9-11.
Air-bombing, as Bertrand Russell long ago pointed out, is inherently
fascist in erasing the killed and maimed from sight while ensuring
impunity for the bombers of defenceless people. But all such mass
murder is only collateral damage to the supreme moral goal as “natural
right and law”. The air bombing of Iraq’s water and electricity
supplies dressed in one big lie after another continued in slow
mass-murderous destruction of the people and their social life
infrastructures years on end.
Denis
Halliday, United Nations Humanitarian Co-ordinator for the mission
finally called it “genocide” (Wikipedia calls it “the Persian Gulf War”)
when he resigned in 1998 to protest against “the crimes against
humanity”. But no-one knew until the U.S. Department of Defense
Intelligence got out that the first sweep of Iraq was planned down to
the mass killing of the infants and children. September 11 in 2001 is
better understood in this wider context of strategic planning by the
covert U.S. terror state. For years the non-stop bombing of the people’s
central life-water support system deliberately engineered mass dying
from diseases of children in the hundreds of thousands.
What was predicted by Harvard Medical School researchers from the
continuous civilian infrastructure bombing by the U.S. military – the
deaths of over 500,000 children- was verified by the counts
scientifically taken at the risk of researchers as the bombing continued
month after month with NATO support.
[xxix]
Full-spectrum corporate money-sequencing through Iraq under the
Comprehensive Privatization Program would only be enabled by “9-11”down
the road. But first the bases of advanced social life organization
needed to be destroyed. The later-leaked U.S. Defense Intelligence
document entitled “Iraq Water Treatment Vulnerabilities” expresses the
moral DNA at work. I cite the key lines of U.S. Defense Intelligence
Agency reports because they reveal the character of the supreme moral
goal and its strategic planning.“With no domestic sources of water
treatment replacement or chemicals like chlorine”and “laden with
biological pollutants and bacteria”, the leaked Defense Intelligence
Agency report says (italics added), “epidemics of such diseases as
cholera, hepatitis, and typhoid” will “probably take six months before
the [drinking and sewage water] system is fully degraded”.
The document continues,
Conditions are favorable for communicable disease outbreaks [by
the one-way air bombing] with the “most likely diseases during next
sixty-ninety days of diarrheal diseases (particularly children) acute
respiratory diseases (colds and influenza); typhoid; hepatitis
(particularly children); measles, diphtheria, and pertussis
(particularly children); meningitis including meningococcal
(particularly children), cholera”. “Medical Problems in Iraq”, dated
March 15, 1991, reports that the “water is less than 5 percent of the
original supply – - diarrhea is four times above normal levels – -
Conditions in Baghdad remain favorable for disease outbreaks”. The fifth
document in June reports “almost all medicines in critically short
supply” and “Gastroenteritis killing children – - in the south, 80
percent of the deaths are children”.
[xxx]
In short, no limit to covert U.S. planning of indiscriminate mass
murder for the supreme goal exists. The number who died in 9-11 suddenly
pales in comparison. In all cases, it lets “those inimical to U.S.
interests” know that there is no limit to how far the covert terror
state will go for the supreme moral code not yet decoded. Combined with
wars of aggression before and after 9-11, raining fire and explosions on
civilians from the air so that no defense or escape can be made,
saturating the fields of public meaning with big lies civilly dangerous
to unmask, and bringing vast enrichment and new powers to transnational
corporate conglomerates and their past and present CEO’s of the acting
U.S. state – all become clear in their ultimate meaning once decoded. As
the Democrat U.S. Secretary of State responded to the question of the
500,000 killed children, “we think the price was worth it”. No price is
too much to pay for fulfilment of the transcendent project of the global
U.S. state and its private capital rule as “the Free World”. “Those
inimical to our interests” are those who oppose or are in the way of it,
and thus “hate our freedom”.
The Strategic Logic of Value through 9-11
By 2000 it was very clear to the U.S. strategic planners that the
opening up of the Middle East and Central Asia after the fall of the
Soviet Union had to be further pursued before it was too late.The great
regret for the planning personnel of the coming Bush Jr. administration
such as Paul Wolfowitz was that Iraq had not been taken over on the
first invasion. The need for “full spectrum dominance” across the Middle
East and Central Asia was thus the essential argument of the Project
for the New American Century (PNAC), with the prescription that no other
“regional power”was able to contest this dominance.
The PNAC more explicitly recognised the strategic necessity for what Zbigniew Brzezinski had already called for in 1998 in
The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives
– namely,“the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived
direct external threat” to ensure public support for “the United States,
as the sole and, indeed, the first truly global power”. The now once
untouchable Central Asia, formerly of the USSR, was thus targeted as
essential not only for its vast oil reserves, but to complete rule of
the “first truly global power”.
The Project for the New American Century was more explicit than
Brzezinski in 2000, the year before 9-11. As former Defence Minister of
Canada, Paul Hellyer, lucidly puts it in a recent address (italics
added):
“The authors of this American ‘Mein Kampf’ [the
PNAC] for conquest recognized the difficulty of persuading sophisticated
Americans to accept such a gigantic change in policy. So they wrote the
following (subsequently removed from the record): ‘Further, the
process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary changes, is
likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event –
like a new Pearl Harbor.’”[xxxi]
Excepting the Vietnam War ending in military defeat – but vastly
enriched armaments and connected private bank and corporate interests –
the hitherto favoured strategic-plan mode had been local death squads
along with pervasive American media propaganda against the victims as
“communists” and “sponsored by the USSR”. But once there was no remotely
equal opponent in mass-kill capacities
and transnational trade
treaties now bound governments within corporate-rights law as
overriding domestic laws and policies, anything became permissible. The
plan for the “supranational sovereignty” of “limitless capital
accumulation” in “full-spectrum power”required only 9-11 to derail
world-wide peace, environmental and anti-corporate globalization
movements growing into uncontrollable civilian capacity across borders
and continents.
People were waking up to the one-way destruction of life systems at
all levels. Iraq was not alone in the genocidal clearance of
formersocialist infrastructures uniting peoples across ethnic lines. A
far more democratic Yugoslavia was set up and destroyed by financial
means in the same year by the 1991 U.S. Foreign Operations
Appropriations Law after the 1980’s multiplication of public interest
rates to over 20percent primedevoured social life support structures
across the world.
This was the unseen financialization base of a global war against
public and worker economic and political powers that was reaping a
cumulative global civilian reaction of opposition to “the plan”. 9-11
ensured against the fightback of financially dispossessed peoples with
the signature reverse operation – diversion to an external “terrorist
threat” that stood in the way of
more sweeping transnational
corporate wars on more peoples being dispossessed. Civil war in
Yugoslavia long targeted by Reagan’s secret National Security Directive
133 as early as 1984 was predicted and occurred after the underlying
employment and welfare structure of multi-ethnic Yugoslavia collapsed
under deliberate financial destabilization. (The villain of the piece,
Slobodan Milosevic, was himself a major banker).
In
oil-rich Somalia, two-thirds of its territory had been leased out to
four transnational oil companies by 1993 – a condition of lost grounds
of life for Somalians behind the primeval civil war ever since. These
are merely expressions of the underlying logic of value and the plan for
its supranational rule beneath the lights of publicity as “discretion”.
The examples are myriad from Latin America to South-East Asia to
sub-Sahara Africa and the Middle East to Israel and Canada today. But a
descriptive law of the supreme moral goal holds across all diverse
instances of its expression.
Strategic planning for the destruction of social life
infrastructures of peoples for private money capital gain without limit
is the ultimate value program throughout from the U.S. to China.
The people of the U.S. are not exempt from their own system of covert
state rule, although democratic heroism here joins with the larger
world against it. This is the ultimate moral struggle on earth today.
The moral politics of the disorder are the enforcement of the
descriptive law. This is the ruling meta program, and it is
carcinogenic by its nature. The supreme motive force it multiplies by is
privately self-maximizing money possession (individual and
corporate)seeking to be limitlessly more.More = Better. Less = Militant
Demand for More.
The “9-11” event is the epicentre of the supreme moral objective
seated in Wall Street. Itis best understood as an ultimate strategic
maximizer of the italicized formula. Exactly expressed, its ultimately
regulating axiology is private money inputs through all life to
maximally more private money outputs in ad infinitum progression: Money Ã
Life as Means à More Money or, formally, $à LasMà $
1,2,3,4— N.
At the highest level of anchoring moral meaning, this private
money-demand rule seeks to be absolute and total across borders with no
quarter. “Full spectrum dominance” is its military method. Yet what
distinguishes it from the Nazi rule it connects with as prior
transnational corporate partner in war making is that in the U.S.
private money demand multiplication at the top is the
only organising
value meaning. 97% of its money command is produced by private bank
notes of others’ debt to the private bank system centred in Wall Street.
Yet despite this very narrow centre of control,almost no global
territory or field of life is outside its rule and strategic plan.
The “Trans-Pacific Partnership” is but its latest expression –
focusing on private knowledge-patent money sequencing to rule out
generic pharmaceuticals and other life-and-death knowledge commons from
which higher profits cannot be made. The one underlying common principle
throughout all phases is transnational corporate and bank money
sequencing to more. Its converse is to overrideall life requirements at
all levels, and strategically planned crises and wars are the advancing
lines of control and enforcement.
What is not recognized through all the genocidal wars,ecocidal
results, collapsing social life support systems and falling wages,
however,is that this
ruling value sequence rationally leads to“
9-11” as maximal strategic payoff progression.“Absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event”, the Project for the New American Century declared before 9-11,
“ – - the U.S risks the loss of a global security order that is uniquely friendly to American principles and prosperity”.
Decoded, this meant in theory and practice more transnational private
money sequence progression to ever more control over all
still-uncontrolled assets for more and richer returns without limit of
take or life destruction. But these are unspeakable lines of value
meaning, and that is likely why, for example, Wikipedia keeps altering
the entry of my name with conspiracy theory attributions and smears to
ensure that such deep-structural diagnosis does not gain currency. That
is how this system works, and analysis will provide more variations of
this gagging method on 9-11 ahead.
The
strategic necessity of the 9-11 event for “global security order”can
even be asserted by the principal architects of the administration under
which it happened, and those who observe this can be dismissed as
“conspiracy theorists”. Reverse projection is, as always, the essential
psychological operation. The documented but shouted-down logistics
included V-P Cheney having control of the air-defence of NORAD six
months before the event to manage the relocation of the stand-by fighter
jets to Alaska and Canada on September 11, 2001, and more broadly, no
jet intervention for almost two hours until the full operation was
completed.
The tell-tale signs that it was not the “foreign act of war” which
was trumpeted were that President Bush Jr. continued exposed in set-up
photo ops with school children during the “attack on the U.S.” Not a
wheel turned in U.S. jet intervention or homeland protection. No evident
defensive action or response whatever occurred.Until strategic security
from public uprising and awareness was established, the blame on
foreign terrorists was repeated non-stop around the clock with no-one
raising a question.
Weeks thus passed in inaction. As the future director of the 9-11
Commission said years before 9-11: “The effort and resources we devote
to averting or containing this threat now, in the ‘before’ period, will
seem woeful, even pathetic, when compared to what will happen ‘after’.”
[xxxii]And
so one war of invasion after another was made upon entirely unproven
sources of the “attack” who were, in fact,states and peoples standing in
the way of vast publicly owned oil-fields. These had to be taken for
control by U.S. and allied state armies for the private transnational
corporations employing their leaders in and out of office.
Money-sequence oil to quadruple-plus more has been the story ever since.
[xxxiii]If
80% of the 19 claimed suicide agents were from oil-ally Saudi Arabia,
if none of their identity paperscould have survived the destroyed
buildings, and if several of these “hijackers” were apparently still
alive, why did none of the vaunted “free press” ever investigate 9-11?
The “noble lie” is built into every step.
The total demolition of the buildings on 9-11 was professionally
executed – impossible to manage except by a technologically
sophisticated state with intelligence support, as former State Secretary
for Defense of Germany, Andreas von Bülow,has concisely observed at the
first-order level: “To hijack four big airliners within a few minutes
and fly them into targets within a single hour and doing so on
complicated flight routes! That is unthinkable, without backing from the
secret apparatuses of state and industry”.
[xxxiv]Turning
huge fireproofed steel-girded buildings in the centre of New York into
fuming debris in a few seconds and melting car bodies nearby extends the
problem of physical impossibility by jet fires. That is why the firemen
were killed by being “falsely told it was a fire, not military
ordnance”.The fire-squad commander who told me this asked me not to name
him because of the harm that might come to him “from the media” – the
9-11 gag again. Yet the core and deciding issue is strangely avoided by
all:
Whatever the technics, every step before and after 9-11 took
place in accordance with the supreme moral objective and covert-state
strategic methods to execute it.The smoking gun is incinerated
buildings. Every step “before” and “after” goes back to the motive, the
crime syndicate, the plan, the payoffs, the seizures and dispossessions.
Reducing the Auto-Determination of Nations Requires the Plan
To reduce the “auto-determination of nations practised in past
centuries” for the “supranational sovereigntyof an intellectual and
banker elite”could only be made possible through “full spectrum
dominance” on the groundas the Project for the New American Century had
independently explained, and“the catastrophic and catalyzing event”
required was “9-11”, however it was accomplished.
Nicholas Rockefeller was already speaking of “the plan”eleven months
before the “9-11” call for emergency help when he said to his close
friend, Aaron Russo:
“There’s going to be an event Aaron…We are going to go
into Afghanistan so we can put a gas pipeline to the Caspian Sea…We are
going to go into Iraq to take the oil and to establish a base in the
Middle East and we’re going to go into Venezuela and try and get rid of
Chávez – - -Through it, you fight the War on Terror and then you go into
Iraq – - the media can convince everybody that it’s real – -”[xxxv]
Lest the reader doubt this witness, it has nowhere been disavowed any
more than the patriarch’s disclosure of “the plan” itself which is also
available on the right-wingCato Institute website. All express the
underlying but observable moral law of motion of this ruling value
system -
to acquire maximally more money demand for private use and
control with no public or other barrier across internal and external
borders by war, trade treaty or any other means whatever the sacrifice
of others’ lives.They do not count in the calculus. All life is an
“externality”. There is no step of the covert U.S. state that does not
obey the formula.
The legality of international treaty was and remains the
transnational legal method already established in the decade before 9-11
to provide the supranational framework of private transnational
money-sequence rule as the moral absolute to which all conformed. Coded
as “the global free market”, it is neither free nor a market, but
oligopolist corporate control of supply, demand, and inert-state policy.
In fact, the supreme morality as defined
overrides all
economic interests themselves by absolute protection of private
transnational “profit opportunity” alone -with thousands of regulations
across borders governed by this moral absolute. This too is testable by
examination of the articles of any transnational trade treaty in the
NATO control zone.
Policy structures follow in line. Tax, financial, natural resource
and investment policies are structured by law and right to ignore all
destruction of social and natural life and life capital bases to grow
transnational private money sequences to limitlessly more.This is why
the self-multiplying money sequencing with no committed life function
has expanded in accordance with this moral absolute through and after
“9-11”. Observe how the ultimately regulating principles of value
prescription and description
all conform to one axiological syntax
across controllable theoretical, economic, political, and other levels
of the global system.[xxxvi]
Thus whatever the world uprisings against it and however destructive
of the planet’s social and ecological life bases, this law of motion
remains the ruling constant. Not even the life impoverishment of the
growing majority and the collapsing of the biosphere itself are allowed
to modify its supranational ruling form. Even a tenth of one percent tax
on its ruinous money-sequence tides or fraction of legal tender to back
them is off-limits.
Not only 9-11 itself, but global policy locks of every kind are the
expressions of this ruling moral absolute as inviolable and supreme,
however much they destroy people’s lives without any committed life
function – the normalization of private-bank compound-interest debts
bleeding peoples dry, destabilizing speculations in sovereign currencies
and bonds, asset-stripping buyouts and disemploying mergers, predatory
repossessions of homes and loan-shark rates on poor debtors including
college students with no limit, endless takeovers of productive firms by
foreign multinationals with only banknotes, ecologically devastating
mega-projects and loot-mining with no environmental or social criteria,
lethal armaments manufacture led by bribery for sales to despots, Wall
Street intermediations in every project with no life commitment, huge
hauls of financial lifeblood from public privatizations to equity
capital multiplying outside of securities regulations, stock-market
derivatives exploiting fabricated money-sequence tides and futures at
the cost of hundreds of millions more hungry people, and- in general –
limitless corporate predation of societies’ domestic resources, home
markets, worker pay and benefits, and public tax revenues.
With all regulating life standards thus erased and repelled,a direct
question arises: Why would the sacrifice of a few thousand mixed-nation
people and two iconic buildings count against this covert value calculus
if it reaped the world in payoff to the under one percent and could
always be blamed on the Enemy to achieve even more full-spectrum
dominance of the ultimate objective over all life and life systems that
limit its growth and universalization?
Conversely, and in particular at the geostrategic armed force level,
if any society does not yet fit into the world system as function of it,
armed invasion can now follow as “defense against the terrorists” who
have “attacked America” in 9-11. As U.S
. General Wesley Clark
has also reported for the public record,this strategic line of war has
been explicit in “U.S. defense” strategic planning for Iraq, Libya,
Sudan, Somalia, Iran, and Syria since 9-11.
The second part of this essay is forthcoming on Global Research.
The complete text published by the Journal of 9/11 Studies can be downloaded in pdf
Professor John McMurtry is a moral philosopher
specializing in social value systems and life-value analysis. His many
articles and books have been internationally published and translated,
and include multi-volume work for UNESCO’s Encyclopedia of Life Support
Systems (EOLSS). He is University Professor Emeritus at the University
of Guelph, and an elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada.
Notes
[i]Understandably,
the improbable physics of the official account of the destruction of
the WTC buildings by jet-plane impact and office fires has drawn
increasing interest. The ejection outwards of steel columns and
assemblies, the severing of fireproofed steel columns, the evidence of
molten metal in the building remains, the acceleration rates of the
descending buildings, the presence of nanothermite in the dust and the
statements of numerous eyewitnesses are some of the obvious signs of
controlled demolition. Detailed discussion of these and other
difficulties with the official account can be found in the Journal of 9/11 Studies and on the website of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth.
[iv] See Charles Higham, Trading with the Enemy: An Expose of the Nazi-American Money Plot 1933-1949 ( New
York: Dell Publishing Co , 1983), the classic documentation and
historical account. Transnational corporations involved after war was
declared in 1942 included IBM (concentration camp identification
system), Dupont (chemical gases), General Motors, Ford (armoured
vehicles) and Union Banking (in which George Bush Jr.’s grandfather was a
Director, making the family’s fortune). All ended up not only with
their property intact or returned, but most with reparations for damages
caused to it.
[v]
An anonymous reviewer of this journal has kindly pointed out that the
concept of “New World Order,” was known in Nazi-occupied Europe as
“l’ordre nouveau,” (France and Belgium), “nieuweorde” (Dutch), and
“nyordre” (Norwegian) in collaborationist discourses during the early
1940’s.
[vi]
After the massive defeat of the German armed forces in the Battle of
Stalingrad in January 1943, Martin Bormann, the Deputy Fuhrer and the
main linkage of the Nazi party with the industrial and financial cartels
that ran the German economy, conceived a plan for post-War organization
of German Nazis in Latin America, South Africa, Egypt and Indonesia
called the “Organization of Veterans of the S.S.,” or Odessa by acronym.
A main element of the Odessa was led by General ReinhardGehlen who was
head of the Foreign Armies East in German Army Headquarters. He was
responsible for all intelligence operations through East Europe and the
Soviet Union, and in the remaining months of the war deposited the
extensive files in a hiding place in the Bavarian Alps. After the war
was over, he negotiated a secret treaty to work “jointly with the
Americans” on the basis of the detailed files and the services of some
4000 agents. “By one estimate, some 70 per cent of the total
intelligence flowing into NATO’s military committee and Allied
headquarters (SHAPE) on the Soviet Union, the countries of East Europe,
the rest of Europe and indeed the rest of the world was generated [from
this source].” (Carl Oglesby, “The Secret Treaty of Fort Hunt”. Covert Action Bulletin,
35, Fall 1990, pp. 8–16.) Corroborating this heavily researched
account, Lake Sagaris reports in her detailed study of Pinochet’s Chile
(Sagaris, op. cit.) that Nazi activity and influence in Chile
was particularly widespread during Pinochet’s military dictatorship from
1973–90 (cited in Graeme Mount, “The Long Shadow of Chile’s Fascism”, Literary Review of Canada, October 1996, pp. 8–10). Pinochet’s coup occurred on September 11, 1973.
[vii]See
note 8, and for ongoing exposure of the moving nexus of
narco-terrorist-covert-U.S.-state operations across continents, see
continual reports by globalresearch.ca.
[x]US
Joint Chiefs of Staff, “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in
Cuba (Top Secret), US Department of Defense, 13 March 1962, published
online in a more comprehensive form by the national Security Archive on
30 April 2001, months before 9-11. (I am indebted to James Bamford, Body of Secrets.
New York: Doubleday from which the text quotation comes, and to Jeremy
Keenan, “How the U.S. Has been sponsoring terrorism in the Sahara”, New
Internationalist, December 12, 2013, p. 35). Lest one wonder why this
mass-murderous plot to terrorize and kill American and other citizens
was not kept secret by the covert U.S. state, and indeed released just
before 9-11, one needs to bear in mind that Rockefeller and the Right do
not object to elite knowledge of “the plan” to liquidate national
sovereignty and self-determination for private banker world rule with
the collaboration of the U.S. corporate media in not reporting it.
Supreme arrogance and helplessness of opponents to do anything about it
are part of the supreme morality, and freedom of information at the top
long after the action of seems internal to the design of U.S. supreme
power. It validates it as de facto reality.
[xi]Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1998 :“Moreover,
as America becomes an increasingly multi-cultural society, it may find
it more difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except
in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct
external threat.” (p. 211). On the international front, Democrat
national security adviser Brzezinski advised : “The defeat and collapse
of the Soviet Union was the final step in the rapid ascendance of a
Western Hemisphere power, the United States, as the sole and, indeed,
the first truly global power.” (p. xiii) and“To put it in a
terminology that harkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires,
the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent
collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep
tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming
together.”(p.40). The 9-11 event managed to fulfil all these objectives at once.
[xii] I document and diagnose these world trends and their economic value doctrine and its bases in depth in Unequal Freedoms: The Global Market as an Ethical System, Toronto: Garamond/ University of Toronto Press, 1998.
[xiii]
While this analysis does track the David Rockefeller thread of “the
plan”, it by no means restricts explanation to this dominant thread of
moral meaning. Many other dominant money-sequence interests are in
interlocked involvement with the supreme value purpose and its system
enactment. In this interlock, for example, Bank of America, JP Morgan
Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo own Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell,
BP and Chevron Texaco along with Deutsche Bank, BNP, and Barclays,
these corporations in turn having heavy involvement in supranational
armaments and media systems. We may observe the wider interlocking
system of transnational money-sequence control of global industry across
domains in the Rockefeller portfolio of Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP
Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United,
Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing,
Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer,
Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods. (See concise
summary at http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-federal-reserve-cartel-the-eight-families/2508). Wherever the U.S. state goes in demand, crime and war it is to enforce this private transnational money sequence system.
[xiv]
Cited by <http://freedom Cited by
<http://freedomlaw.com/coffee.html> which lists among its sponsors
the Cato Institute, the Heritage, and the Mackinac Centre for Public
Policy.
[xv] This complex point is spelled out in the second edition of The Cancer Stage of Capitalism/ From Crisis to Cure. London: Pluto and Palgrave-Macmillan, 2013.
[xvi]
The most developed account of this and the above citation and their
context is by Daniel Estulin, The True Story of the Bilderberg Group.
Walterville:Trine Day. 2007 (also translated in Spanish). Estulin’s
grandfather was a senior KGB agent and his father was expelled from the
Soviet Union for his activities on behalf of free speech.
[xvii] I am indebted to Paul Hellyer, former Minister of Defence of Canada, for this fact and its disclosure.
[xviii] I define reverse projection as attributing to others what you are doing yourself as the reason for attacking them. U.S. foreign policy is defined by this generic reversal operation. The reversals have five standard operations: i. claiming humanitarian assistance to victims of a regime when in fact bombing or attacking them; ii. standing up to terrorism when by far the greater terrorism is perpetrated by doing so; iii. covertly supporting the very terrorist organisations as a justification for these dominant terrorist activities; iv. imposing the extremest form of terror, torture, to “stop the terrorists”; v.
planning, organising and waging the supreme crime of humanity, a war of
aggression, to compel the other society to “comply with the laws and
norms of the community of nations”.
[xix] Cited in archive.democrats.com/view.cfm?id=5166 – United States.
[xx] Social science report of the Leo Strauss school of thought and its national security disciples is provided by Shadia Drury, Leo Strauss and the American Right. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1999.
[xxi] Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953, p. 60.
[xxii]Cancer Stage, ibid, spells out this great aporia in Marx’s theory at both life capital and money capital ends.
[xxiv] This historical pathogenesis is tracked in depth in McMurtry, The Cancer Stage of Capitalism: From Crisis to Cure. Ibid, in both first and second editions, 1999/2013.
[xxv] I spell this meaning out in formal depth in “Behind Global System Collapse: The Life-Blind Structure of Economic Rationality”, Journal of Business Ethics (2012), 108:1, 49-61.
[xxvi] Pareto, Vilfredo, (1971 [1906]), Manual of Political Economy, New York: A.M. Kelley, p. 12.
[xxvii] John Rawls assumes the self-maximizing principle as the ultimately regulating principle of rationality in A Theory of Justice when he says: “From the standpoint of the original position, it is rational for parties to suppose that they do want a larger share – - The concept of rationality invoked here – - is the standard one familiar in social theory” – - ” (A Theory of Justice
. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971, p 143). As to how this
first premise shared by “social theory” as “standard” leads to
entailments that are not tracked is spelled out step by step in John
McMurtry, “Human Rights v. Corporate Rights: Understanding Life-Value,
the Civil Commons, and Social Justice,” Studies in Social Justice, 5(1) (Summer, 2011), 11-61.
[xxix]
The fuller description and documentation of the war crimes and crimes
against humanity by the U.S. in Iraq from 1990 on can be found in Value Wars: The Global Market versus the Life Economy . London: Pluto, 2002, pp. 30-36.
[xxxi]
“Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a
New Century. A report of the Project for the New American Century,
September 2000.” The description of this “new Mein Kampf” is
from Hon. Paul Hellyer, “The G20 Fiddles While The Planet Burns”, Global
Breakthrough Energy Conference, Sunday, November 11, 2012.
[xxxii] See note 47 and page context for the bright idea from the Executive Director of the “9/11 Commission” long before 9-11.
[xxxiii] The average price of oil was $24.08 per barrel in August 2001, $28.27 in 2000, and $10.20 in 1998.
[xxxiv]Tagesspiegel, 13.
Jan. 2002. Andreas von Bulow is an especially relevant analyst on this
score as almost uniquely a renowned scholar in covert-state activities
and a former minister of defence.
[xxxv]<http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MGF6DDd8Uto>. I am indebted to software engineer Kip Warner for this reference.
[xxxvi] This framework of diagnosis of the system 9-11 expresses is spelled out in systematic depth in The Cancer Stage of Capitalism / From Crisis to Cure forthcoming April 2013, the second edition of the original 1999 study.
Posts
Except
us. We are the first large retailer to carry this chlorella, which we
call "Clean Chlorella SL" where "SL" stands for sunlight. This is the
cleanest chlorella we could find that's grown in pools where it receives
natural sunlight. This sunlight helps boost production of chlorophyll
and CGF (Chlorella Growth Factor), a unique complex of peptides and
phytonutrients that's unique to chlorella.
AVERAGE ALUMINUM CONTAMINATION OF CHLORELLA BY COUNTRY OF ORIGIN:
By Michael, on February 18th, 2013 
