Saturday, September 19, 2015

THE GMO SCRAPBOOK: RUSSIA AND CHINA IN $10 BILLION AGRIBUSINESS DEAL

In last Thursday's News and Views from the Nefarium I commented about the significant developments taking place between Saudi Arabia and the Russian Federation. Both countries, as I implied in my remarks, are embarking on aggressive and far-reaching diplomatic initiatives that - just by being broached - can fundamental alter the current diplomatic, geopoliical international order. As I've suggested in a few recent blogs, Saudi Arabia has been undergoing some internal shifts of power, succession struggles, and so on, for a number of years, and these overtures toward Russia are significant enough to suggest either that the kingdom has stabilized its internal affairs enough to undertake such overtures, or that it feels increasingly threatened by external developments, or both. One possible way to read it, from our amateurs' sidelines, is that Saudi Arabia is looking at the developments of China's "New Silk Road" project, and wants in on the game, and is not going to get in that game if it continues to be perceived (note the word) as a close ally of the West.
For Russia's part, as I also noted in Thursday's News and Views, it is playing an increasing role - and trying to position itself - as the stabilizing and sympathetic element in great power involvement in the Middle East after Washington's abysmal failures of the last decade. Drones and bombs and covert ops aren't working, and the results are there for all to see, as powerful US allies continue not only to question Washington's course, but to increase the frequency of their questions. Russia along with France and Germany was a major factor in helping to negotiate the recent nuclear deal with Iran, and no significant cooling of relations between Moscow and Tehran appear to be in the cards for the foreseeable future.
Which makes the recent Riyadh overtures to Moscow all the more interesting, since Tehran is not - to say the least - high on the kingdom's list of favorite countries. And one can only assume that the Saudis do not undertake such sweeping overtures to Moscow without quietly feeling out the opinions of Tel Aviv either.
All of this makes this bit of information, shared by "Mr. S", all the more intriguing:
Russia and China to Launch Huge $10 Billion Agribusiness Fund
This development has profound long term implications on any number of grounds, but let's consider just a few of them. Siberia, for one thing, has been consistently, throughout its long history of incorporation into the Russian empire since the days of "the collection of the Russian lands" and the collapse of Mongol influence in the country, the most under-developed region of the huge country, in no small part because of its harsh climate. But imagine the transformation of that great wilderness into a rich agricultural region through the application of technologies and capital investments. This, in short, is what we're looking at: Russian development of the region as an agricultural region aided by Chinese capital. The Chinese, in return, gain a measure of relief to one of their most consistent and persistent problems: how to feed such a large population?
One key issue here, and one to watch, is the GMO issue, which is why I've put this article in our "GMO scrapbook" file, for Russia, as we have pointed out on this site, has increasingly called into question both the wisdom of, and science behind, GMOs, while China, on the other hand, has been a major investor into the development of those technologies. Hence the question occurs: will Chinese money buy an influence over and moderation of the Russian government's policies, or conversely, will Russia continue to insist on increasing yield and production in the region through other technological means? For the moment, I suspect that Russia will have the upper hand in this decision(after all, it's their land that's being developed). This in turn could have a major effect on how the GMO issue increasingly becomes a major issue of international politics.
But there's another key issue that will inevitably be involved in these plans, and that, quite simply, is Japan. In the wake of the ongoing Fukushima disaster, the Japanese food supply, like its energy supplies, is increasingly dependent on foreign sources. Development of the Russian far east as a major agricultural zone would inevitably suck Japan into the picture, as the region would be a nearby and ready-to-hand supply of food imports for the country, which thus far has relied heavily on American, Canadian, and Australian  food imports. The nearness of the region would dramatically cut shipping costs. And for Russia, Japan holds the geopolitical key to preventing the undo growth of Chinese influence within the region.
In short, all this means that these developments are again, onces to watch, for they contain, quite literally, the seeds of long term fundamental alteration of the international gepolitical stage.

Big U.S. Banks Confirmed As... CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES




by Christopher Story
1 July 2010

from WorldReports Website

MISPRISION OF FELONY

U.S. CODE, TITLE 18, PART 1, CHAPTER 1, SECTION 4:
‘Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some Judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both’.



Note: Nothing should be construed from the fact that this report is about the criminal banks engaged in drug-money laundering, and not about the usual subject.

We haven't enough reliable material to elaborate further, yet, following the end of the abortive G-20 meeting in Toronto.


 


The following banks and currency exchanges are mentioned in this report:


  • American Express Bank International
  • Banco Santander SA
  • Bank of America
  • Casa de Cambio Puebla SA
  • Citigroup, Inc.
  • HSBC Holdings, London and Mexico
  • Mexican street currency-exchange firms [3,000]
  • Standard Chartered PLC, London
  • Wachovia, including London
  • Wells Fargo
  • Western Union


 

 

WACHOVIA, WELLS FARGO, BANK OF AMERICA ARE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES, LIKE WE SAID


Some time ago, we learned that Wachovia had consulted its lawyers to establish whether they could sue us for describing the bank, among others, as a criminal enterprise.

 

Their lawyers are believed to have advised them, in so many words, that, not least given investigative journalistic freedom of speech considerations, our observations represented 'fair comment'. Behind that advice lay the knowledge that since Wachovia was involved in money laundering drug money, we might well know this and be able to prove it. So the matter was dropped.

As the entire 'Black' Octopus criminal carousel unravels faster than the kleptocracy can keep up with events, other sources are now starting to do our exposure work for us. Late in the day, as usual: but better late than never.

 

We therefore take the opportunity to post, verbatim, the following article by Michael Smith for Bloomberg, which of course proves our point.

 

Wachovia, Wells Fargo and Bank of America, for starters, are egregious criminal enterprises. Money laundering of drug proceeds is an unspeakable crime and the most senior officials of these institutions should be arrested and forced to suffer SEVERE consequences.

 

But that isn't happening.
 

 

 


'MAINSTREAM' MEDIA CONTINUE TO IGNORE THE CENTRAL ISSUE: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY


We are sick and tired of the way the so-called 'mainstream' media are waffling about every nuance under the sun and OMITTING the central issue: RAMPANT CRIMINALITY and the banks' open-ended breaches of the law, and their arrogance based on fears that they might collapse.

Securitization is ILLEGAL in the United States and in all Common Law countries, as we have demonstrated and proved with the aid of impeccable outside academic research.

 

Yet there has been NO RESPONSE TO OUR EXPOSURE OF THIS FLOUTING OF THE RULE OF LAW, EITHER.

The following Bloomberg report indicates that, at long last, some 'mainstream' reporters have managed to lift themselves off their brains and to start exposing the truth. Separately, we have been exposing drug-trafficking operations in our title The Latin American Times, and continue to do so.

 

You may also be interested to know that before his 'switch', following the 'bait' during which he stole the Editor's $35,000 LOAN which should have been repaid at arms' length plus 7% per annum for two years, on 11th June 2007, Wanta told the Editor:

'If you expose the drug traffickers, they will kill you'.

We listed that threat among the 37 threats against the Editor so far received.

 

THE BLOOMBERG REPORT STARTS HERE:
[Note: With interpolations by the Editor]
 

 

 

 

 




U.S. BANKS FINANCING MEXICO DRUG GANGS

ADMITTED IN WELLS FARGO DEAL
by Michael Smith

June 29 2010



To contact the reporter on this story:
Michael Smith in Santiago, Chile
at mssmith@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: June 29, 2010 00:00 EDT



June 29 (Bloomberg) - Just before sunset on April 10, 2006, a DC-9 jet landed at the international airport in the port city of Ciudad del Carmen, 500 miles east of Mexico City. As soldiers on the ground approached the plane, the crew tried to shoo them away, saying there was a dangerous oil leak. So the troops grew suspicious and searched the jet.

They found 128 black suitcases, packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100 million. The stash was supposed to have been delivered from Caracas to drug traffickers in Toluca, near Mexico City, Mexican prosecutors later found. Law enforcement officials also discovered something else.

The smugglers had bought the DC-9 with laundered funds they transferred through two of the biggest banks in the U.S.: Wachovia Corp. and Bank of America Corp., Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its August 2010 issue.

This was no isolated incident. Wachovia, it turns out, had made a habit of helping move money for Mexican drug smugglers. Wells Fargo & Co., which bought Wachovia in 2008, has admitted in court that its unit failed to monitor and report suspected money laundering by narcotics traffickers - including the cash used to buy four planes that shipped a total of 22 tons of cocaine.

The admission came in an agreement that Charlotte, North Carolina-based Wachovia struck with federal prosecutors in March, and it sheds light on the largely undocumented role of U.S. banks in contributing to the violent drug trade that has convulsed Mexico for the past four years.


 





BLATANT DISREGARD FOR THE RULE OF LAW AND BASIC MORALITY


Wachovia admitted it didn't do enough to spot illicit funds in handling $378.4 billion for Mexican-currency-exchange houses from 2004 to 2007.



That's the largest violation of the Bank Secrecy Act, an anti-money-laundering law, in U.S. history - a sum equal to one-third of Mexico's current gross domestic product.

"Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations", says Jeffrey Sloman, the Federal Prosecutor who handled the case.

Since 2006, more than 22,000 people have been killed in drug-related battles that have raged mostly along the 2,000-mile (3,200-kilometer) border that Mexico shares with the U.S. In the Mexican city of Ciudad Juarez, just across the border from El Paso, Texas, 700 people had been murdered this year as of mid- June. Six Juarez police officers were slaughtered by automatic weapons fire in a midday ambush in April.

Rodolfo Torre, the leading candidate for governor in the Mexican border state of Tamaulipas, was gunned down yesterday, less than a week before elections in which violence related to drug trafficking was a central issue.
 






45000 MEXICAN TROOPS DEPLOYED AGAINST THE CARTELS


Mexican President Felipe Calderon vowed to crush the drug cartels when he took office in December 2006, and he's since deployed 45,000 troops to fight the cartels.

They've had little success.

Among the dead are police, soldiers, journalists and ordinary citizens. The United States has 'pledged' Mexico $1.1 billion in the past two years to aid in the fight against narcotics cartels.
 


[EDITOR'S INSERT: This is absurd. Under the standard double-mindedness, dialectical non-ethic that characterizes the criminalist behavior of elements of the US Government, law enforcement and the Drug Enforcement Administration battle valiantly against the proliferation of Mexican drug gangs, which now operate in every corner of the United States. Meanwhile, the drug offensive was organized and orchestrated by CIA operatives in Latin America in the 1970s and 1980s, aided by Israeli 'Black' intelligence headed by David Kimche (who died of brain cancer on 8th March 2010) and Michael Harari. Their involvement is proven by the Cutolo Affidavit dated 11th March 1980.

The military officer (Cutolo) was subsequently murdered, along with 'Bo' Baker and others because of their knowledge inter alia of this criminal activity. The barrels of precursor chemicals found in the forests of Colombia and elsewhere did not materialize from nowhere. The 'Anglo-Saxons' and their nefarious Israeli cutouts took over and organized the disparate competing Latin American gangs, establishing a self-perpetuating scourge run by peasant criminals: a perfect cut-out.

Incidentally, after David Kimche died, The Daily Telegraph boobed by publishing a photograph in which he was shown (engaged in negotiations with the Lebanese in 1972) but wrongly attributed. We have published a recent issue of Arab-Asian Affairs (which title we bought unknowingly from Kimche's brother, Jon Kimche, in 1975). Jon Kimche used to come to our office, as he continued for a time as Editor (until he doubled his price, whereupon we fired him). We are therefore familiar with the facial characteristics of the Kimche brothers. Investigations by this service revealed that ALL picture representations of David Kimche published in The Jerusalem Post, Haaretz, The Daily Telegraph, The Times and US newspapers have been FRAUDULENT all along.

They have all identified several individuals wrongly as David Kimche and continue to do so after his death. Why? To protect ongoing and past, highly incriminating and sensitive drug operations].

 


In May, President Barack Obama said he'd send 1,200 National Guard troops, adding to the 17,400 agents on the U.S. side of the border to help stem drug traffic and illegal immigration.

Behind the carnage in Mexico is an industry that supplies hundreds of tons of cocaine, heroin, marijuana and methamphetamines to Americans. The cartels have built a network of dealers in 231 U.S. cities, taking in about $39 billion in sales annually, according to the Justice Department.
 






ITS THE CRIMINAL BANKS THAT SHOULD BE PROSECUTED AND MADE TO SUFFER


Twenty million people in the U.S. regularly use illegal drugs, spurring street crime and wrecking families.



Narcotics cost the U.S. economy $215 billion a year - enough to cover health care for 30.9 million Americans - in overburdened courts, prisons and hospitals and lost productivity.

"It's the banks laundering money for the cartels that finances the tragedy", says Martin Woods, Director of Wachovia's anti-money-laundering unit in London from 2006 to 2009.

Woods says he quit the bank in disgust after executives ignored his documentation that drug dealers were funneling money through Wachovia's branch network.

"If you don't see the correlation between the money laundering by banks and the 22,000 people killed in Mexico, you're missing the point", Woods says.


 


WACHOVIA ONE OF MANY U.S. AND EUROPEAN BANKS HANDLING DRUG MONEY


Wachovia is just one of the U.S. and European banks that have been used for drug money laundering. For the past two decades, Latin American drug traffickers have gone to U.S. banks to cleanse their dirty cash, says Paul Campo, head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's financial crimes unit.

Miami-based American Express Bank International paid fines in both 1994 and 2007 after admitting that it had failed to spot and report drug dealers laundering money through its accounts. Drug traffickers used accounts at Bank of America in Oklahoma City to buy three planes that carried 10 tons of cocaine, according to Mexican court filings.

Federal agents caught people who work for Mexican cartels depositing illicit funds in Bank of America accounts in Atlanta, Chicago and Brownsville, Texas, from 2002 to 2009.



Mexican drug dealers used shell companies to open accounts at London-based HSBC Holdings Plc, Europe's biggest bank by assets, an investigation by the Mexican Finance Ministry found.
 






CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE BANKS HIDE BEHIND RHETORIC AND CLIENT CONFIDENTIALITY


Those two banks weren't accused of wrongdoing. Bank of America spokeswoman Shirley Norton and HSBC spokesman Roy Caple say laws bar them from discussing specific clients. They say their banks strictly follow the government rules.

"Bank of America takes its anti-money-laundering responsibilities very seriously" Norton says.
[EDITOR: Translation: This is a deliberately vacuous, meaningless and empty statement].

A Mexican judge on January 22 accused the owners of six centros cambiarios, or money changers, in Culiacan and Tijuana of laundering drug funds through their accounts at the Mexican units of Banco Santander SA, Citigroup Inc. and HSBC, according to court documents filed in the case.

The money changers are in jail while being tried. Citigroup, HSBC and Santander, which is the largest Spanish bank by assets, weren't accused of any wrongdoing.

The three banks say Mexican law bars them from commenting on the case, adding that they each carefully enforce anti-money-laundering programs.

HSBC has stopped accepting dollar deposits in Mexico, and Citigroup no longer allows non-customers to change dollars there. Citigroup detected suspicious activity in the Tijuana accounts, reported it to regulators and closed the accounts, spokesman Paulo Carreno says.

[EDITOR: Yeah, after the event and after the temperature got too hot].
 

 

 


FOCUS IS ON THE CARTELS - BUT THEY CAN'T OPERATE WITHOUT CRIMINAL BANKS


On June 15, the Mexican Finance Ministry announced it would set limits for banks on cash deposits in dollars. Mexico's drug cartels have become multinational criminal enterprises.

Some of the gangs have delved into other illegal activities such as gunrunning, kidnapping and smuggling people across the border, as well as into seemingly legitimate areas such as trucking, travel services and air cargo transport, according to the us Justice Department's National Drug Intelligence Center.

These criminal empires have no choice but to use the global banking system to finance their businesses, Mexican Senator Felipe Gonzalez says.

"With so much cash, the only way to move this money is through the banks", says Gonzalez, who represents a central Mexican state and chairs the senate public safety committee.

[EDITOR: In January 2009, Sr. Maria Antonio Costa, head of the Vienna-based UNDOC, told the Austrian journal Profil in an interview that the only liquidity in the interbank sector during the second half of 2008 was drug money. Actually, he meant from the discontinuity that took place on 10-12 September, after which the Editor received three gunshots on our voicemail: see passim].

Gonzalez, a member of Calderon's National Action Party, carries a .38 revolver for protection.

"I know this won't stop the narcos when they come through that door with machine guns". he says, pointing to the entrance to his office. "But at least I'll take one with me".

 


 

NO BANK MORE CLOSELY LINKED TO MEXICAN DRUG LAUNDERING THAN WACHOVIA


No bank has been more closely connected with Mexican money laundering than Wachovia. Founded in 1879, Wachovia became the largest bank by assets in the southeastern U.S. by 1900.



After the Great Depression, some savvy people in North Carolina called the bank "Walk-Over-Ya" because it had foreclosed on farms in the region.

By 2008, Wachovia was the sixth-largest American lender, and it faced $26 billion in losses from subprime mortgage loans. That cost Wachovia Chief Executive Officer Kennedy Thompson his job in June 2008.

Six months later, San Francisco-based Wells Fargo, which dates from 1852, bought Wachovia for $12.7 billion, creating the largest network of bank branches in the U.S. Thompson, who now works for private-equity firm Aquiline Capital Partners LLC in New York, declined to comment.

As Wachovia's balance sheet was bleeding, its legal woes were mounting. In the three years leading up to Wachovia's agreement with the Justice Department, grand juries served the bank with 6,700 subpoenas requesting information.
 






WACHOVIA REACTED LETHARGICALLY TO THIS GRAND JURY ONSLAUGHT


The bank didn't react quickly enough to the prosecutors' requests and failed to hire enough investigators, the U.S. Treasury Department said in March. After a 22-month investigation, the Justice Department on March 12 charged Wachovia with violating the Bank Secrecy Act by failing to run an effective anti-money-laundering program.

Five days later, Wells Fargo promised in a Miami federal courtroom to revamp its detection systems. Wachovia's new owner paid $160 million in fines and penalties, less than 2 percent of its $12.3 billion profit in 2009.

If Wells Fargo keeps its pledge, the U.S. government will, according to the agreement, drop all charges against the bank in March 2011.
[EDITOR: WHAT A SCANDAL].

Wells Fargo regrets that some of Wachovia's former anti-money-laundering efforts fell short, spokeswoman Mary Eshet says.



Wells Fargo has invested $42 million in the past three years to improve its anti-money-laundering program and has been working with regulators, she says.
 






'AFTER THE HORSES HAVE BOLTED' WHINING

"We have substantially increased the caliber and number of staff in our international investigations group, and we also significantly upgraded the monitoring software", Eshet says.

The agreement bars the bank from contesting or contradicting the facts in its admission.

The bank declined to answer specific questions, including how much it made by handling $378.4 billion - including $4 billion of cash-from Mexican exchange companies.
[EDITOR: PROTECTED]

The 1970 Bank Secrecy Act requires banks to report all cash transactions above $10,000 to regulators and to tell the Government about other suspected money-laundering activity.

Big banks employ hundreds of investigators and spend millions of dollars on software programs to scour accounts.
[EDITOR: GREAT. BUT HASN'T ADDRESSED THE BANKS' CRIMINALITY]

No big U.S. bank - Wells Fargo included - has ever been indicted for violating the Bank Secrecy Act or any other Federal law.



Instead, the Justice Department settles criminal charges by using deferred-prosecution agreements, in which a bank pays a fine and promises do it again.
 






BANKS PROTECTED BY FEARS THAT A BANK COLLAPSE WOULD IMPLODE THE SYSTEM


Large banks are protected from indictments by a variant of the too-big-to-fail theory.

Indicting a big bank could trigger a mad dash by investors to dump shares and cause panic in financial markets, says Jack Blum, a U.S. Senate investigator for 14 years and a consultant to international banks and brokerage firms on money laundering.

The theory is like a get-out-of-jail-free card for big banks, Blum says.
[EDITOR: Jack Blum is a highly respected investigator, a man of the highest integrity and calibre].

"There's no capacity to regulate or punish them because they're too big to be threatened with failure", Blum says. "They seem to be willing to do anything that improves their bottom line, until they're caught".
[EDITOR: ACCURATE, ACCURATE, ACCURATE, ACCURATE]

Wachovia's run-in with Federal prosecutors hasn't troubled investors. Wells Fargo's stock traded at $30.86 on March 24, up 1 percent in the week after the March 17 agreement was announced.

Moving money is central to the drug trade - from the cash that people tape to their bodies as they cross the U.S.-Mexican border, to the $100,000 wire transfers they send from Mexican exchange houses to big U.S. banks.
 






BORDER FENCE DOESN'T STOP ANYONE - A HUGE WALL IS NECESSARY


In Tijuana, 15 miles south of San Diego, Gustavo Rojas has lived for a quarter of a century in a shack in the shadow of the 10-foot-high (3-meter-high) steel border fence that separates the U.S. and Mexico there.



He points to holes burrowed under the barrier.

"They go across with drugs and come back with cash," Rojas, 75, says.

"This fence doesn't stop anyone".

Drug money moves back and forth across the border in an endless cycle. In the U.S., couriers take the cash from drug sales to Mexico - as much as $29 billion a year, according to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. That would be about 319 tons of $100 bills. [EDITOR: NO. $45 BILLION]

They hide it in cars and trucks to smuggle into Mexico. There, cartels pay people to deposit some of the cash into Mexican banks and branches of international banks.



The narcos launder much of what's left through money changers.
 






DRUG MONEY LAUNDERED THROUGH STREET MONEY TRADERS


Anyone who has been to Mexico is familiar with these street-corner money changers; Mexican regulators say there are at least 3,000 of them from Tijuana to Cancun, usually displaying large signs advertising the day's dollar-peso exchange rate.

Mexican banks are regulated by the National Banking and Securities Commission, which has an anti-money-laundering unit; the money changers are supposedly policed by Mexico's Tax Service Administration, which has no such unit.

By law, the money changers have to demand identification from anyone exchanging more than $500. They also have to report transactions higher than $5,000 to regulators.

The cartels get around these requirements by employing legions of individuals - including relatives, maids and gardeners - to convert small amounts of dollars into pesos or to make deposits in local banks. After that, cartels wire the money to a multinational bank.
 






SMALL MONEY EXCHANGES ARE CALLED SMURFS


The people making the small money exchanges are known as Smurfs, after the cartoon characters.

"They can use an army of people like Smurfs and go through $1 million before lunchtime", says Jerry Robinette, who oversees U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations along the border in east Texas.

The U.S. Treasury has been warning banks about big Mexican- currency-exchange firms laundering drug money since 1996. By 2004, many U.S. banks had closed their accounts with these companies, which are known as casas de cambio.

Wachovia ignored warnings by regulators and police, per the deferred-prosecution agreement.

"As early as 2004, Wachovia understood the risk", the bank admitted in court. "Despite these warnings, Wachovia remained in the business".

One customer that Wachovia took on in 2004 was Casa de Cambio Puebla SA, a Puebla, Mexico-based currency-exchange company.



Pedro Alatorre, who ran a Puebla branch in Mexico City, had created front companies for cartels, according to a pending Mexican criminal case against him.
 






FEDERAL INDICTMENT IN MIAMI


A Federal Grand Jury in Miami indicted Puebla, Alatorre and three other executives in February 2008 for drug trafficking and money laundering. In May 2008, the Justice Department sought extradition of the suspects, saying they used shell firms to launder $720 million through U.S. banks.

Alatorre has been in a Mexican jail for 2 1/2 years. He denies any wrongdoing, his lawyer Mauricio Moreno says. Alatorre has made no court-filed responses in the U.S.

During the period in which Wachovia admitted to moving money out of Mexico for Puebla, couriers carrying clear plastic bags stuffed with cash went to the branch Alatorre operated at the Mexico City airport, according to surveillance reports by Mexican police.

Alatorre opened accounts at HSBC on behalf of front companies, Mexican investigators found.

Puebla executives used the stolen identities of 74 people to launder money through Wachovia accounts, Mexican prosecutors say in court-filed reports.
 






WACHOVIA NEVER REPORTED ANY TRANSACTIONS AS SUSPICIOUS

"Wachovia handled all the transfers, and they never reported any as suspicious", says Jose Luis Marmolejo, former head of the Mexican Attorney General's financial crimes, now in private practice.

In November 2005 and January 2006, Wachovia transferred a total of $300,000 from Puebla to a Bank of America account in Oklahoma City, according to information in the Alatorre cases in the United States and Mexico.

Drug smugglers used the funds to buy the DC-9 through Oklahoma City aircraft broker U.S. Aircraft Titles Inc., according to financial records cited in the Mexican criminal case. U.S. Aircraft Titles President Sue White declined to comment.

On April 5, 2006, a pilot flew the plane from St. Petersburg, Florida, to Caracas to pick up the cocaine, according to the DEA. Five days later, troops seized the plane in Ciudad del Carmen and burned the drugs at a nearby army base.
 






WACHOVIA KNEW PERFECTLY WELL WHAT WAS GOING ON

"I am sure Wachovia knew what was going on", says jJose Marmolejo, who oversaw the criminal investigation into Wachovia's customers.

"It went on too long and they made too much money not to have known".

At Wachovia's anti-money-laundering unit in London, Woods and his colleague Jim DeFazio, in Charlotte, say they suspected that drug dealers were using the bank to move funds.

Woods, a former Scotland Yard investigator, spotted illegible signatures and other suspicious markings on traveler's checks from Mexican exchange companies, he said in a September 2008 letter to the U.K. Financial Services Authority. He sent copies of the letter to the DEA and Treasury Department in the United States.

Woods, 45, says his bosses instructed him to keep quiet and tried to have him fired, according to his letter to the FSA. In one meeting, a bank official insisted Woods shouldn't have filed suspicious activity reports to the Government, as both US and UK laws require.
 

 




LONDON WACHOVIA BOSSES TRIES TO SILENCE WHISTLEBLOWER WHO THEN LEFT BANK

"I was shocked by the content and outcome of the meeting, genuinely traumatized", Woods wrote.

In the U.S., DeFazio, a Federal Bureau of Investigation agent for 21 years, says he told bank executives in 2005 that the DEA was probing the transfers through Wachovia to buy the planes.

Bank executives spurned recommendations to close suspicious accounts, DeFazio, 63, says.

"I think they looked at the money and said, 'The hell with it. We're going to bring it in, and look at all the money we'll make'", DeFazio says.

"I didn't want anything from them", he says. "I just wanted to get out".

Woods, who resigned from Wachovia in May 2009, now advises banks on how to combat money laundering. He declined to discuss details of Wachovia's actions.

U.S. Comptroller of the Currency John Dugan told Woods in a March 19 2010 letter that his efforts had helped the United States build its case against Wachovia.



He wrote:

"You demonstrated great courage and integrity by speaking up when you saw problems".

It was the Puebla investigation that led U.S. authorities to the broader probe of Wachovia. On May 16, 2007, DEA agents conducted a raid of Wachovia's international banking offices in Miami. They had a court order to seize Puebla's accounts.

U.S. prosecutors and investigators then scrutinized the bank's dealings with Mexican-currency-exchange firms. That led to the March deferred-prosecution agreement.

With Puebla's Wachovia accounts seized, Alatorre and his partners shifted their laundering scheme to HSBC, according to financial documents cited in the Mexican criminal case against Alatorre.

In the three weeks after the DEA raided Wachovia, two of Alatorre's front companies, Grupo ETPB SA and Grupo Rahero SC, made 12 cash deposits totaling $1 million at an HSBC Mexican branch, Mexican investigators found.
 






DRUG MONEY NOW LAUNDERED THROUGH HSBC TO BUY ANOTHER PLANE


The funds financed a Beechcraft King Air 200 plane that police seized on December 29, 2007, in Cuernavaca, 50 miles south of Mexico City, according to information in the case against Alatorre.

For years, Federal authorities watched as the wife and daughter of Oscar Oropeza, a drug smuggler working for the Matamoros-based Gulf Cartel, deposited stacks of cash at a Bank of America branch on Boca Chica Boulevard in Brownsville, Texas, less than 3 miles from the border.

Investigator Robinette sits in his pickup truck across the street from that branch. It's a one-story, tan stucco building next to a Kentucky Fried Chicken outlet.



Robinette discusses the Oropeza case with Tom Salazar, an agent who investigated the family.

"Everybody in there knew who they were - the tellers, everyone", Salazar says.

"The bank never came to us, though".
[EDITOR: COURSE NOT. IT'S A CIA CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE]


 

 

MICRO-MONEY LAUNDERING TECHNIQUE


The Oropeza case gives a new, literal meaning to the term money laundering. Oropeza's wife, Tina Marie, and daughter Paulina Marie, deposited stashes of $20 bills several times a day into Bank of America accounts, Salazar says.



Bank employees knew the Oropezas by smelling their money.

"I asked the tellers what they were talking about, and they said the money had this sweet smell like Bounce, those sheets you throw into the dryer", Salazar says. "They told me that when they opened the vault, the smell of Bounce just poured out".

Oropeza, 48, was arrested 820 miles from Brownsville, Texas.



On May 31, 2007, police in Saraland, Alabama, stopped him on a traffic violation. Checking his record, they learned of the investigation in Texas. They searched the van and discovered 84 kilograms (185 pounds) of cocaine hidden under a false floor. That allowed Federal agents to freeze Oropeza's bank accounts and search his marble-floored home in Brownsville, Robinette says.

Inside, investigators found a supply of Bounce alongside the clothes dryer.

All three Oropezas pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court in Brownsville, TX, to drug and money-laundering charges in March and April 2008. Oscar Oropeza was sentenced to 15 years in prison; his wife was ordered to serve 10 months and his daughter got 6 months.

Bank of America's Norton says:

"We not only fulfilled our regulatory obligation, but we proactively worked with law enforcement on these matters".
[EDITOR: NEFARIOUS HUMBUG]

Prosecutors have tried to halt money laundering at American Express Bank International twice.



In 1994, the bank, then a subsidiary of New York-based American Express Co., pledged not to allow money laundering again after two employees were convicted in a criminal case involving drug trafficker Juan Garcia Abrego.

In 1994, the bank paid $14 million to settle. Five years later, drug money again flowed through American Express Bank. Between 1999 and 2004, the bank failed to stop clients from laundering $55 million of narcotics funds, the bank admitted in a deferred-prosecution accord in August 2007.

It paid $65 million to the United States and promised not to break the law again. The government dismissed the criminal charge a year later.



American Express sold the bank to the London-based Standard Chartered PLC in February 2008 for $823 million.
 



 


WESTERN UNION TURNED A BLIND EYE TO DRUG-MONEY LAUNDERING


Banks aren't the only financial institutions that have turned a blind eye to drug cartels in moving illicit funds. Western Union Co., the world's largest money transfer firm, agreed to pay $94 million in February 2010 to settle civil and criminal investigations by the Arizona Attorney General's office.

Undercover state police posing as drug dealers bribed Western Union employees to illegally transfer money, says Cameron Holmes, an assistant Attorney General.

"Their allegiance was to the smugglers", Holmes says. "What they thought about during work was 'How may I please my highest- spending customers the most?'"

Workers in more than 20 Western Union offices allowed the customers to use multiple names, pass fictitious identifications and smudge their fingerprints on documents, court records say.

"In all the time we did undercover operations, we never once had a bribe turned down", says Holmes, citing court affidavits.

Western Union has made significant improvements, it complies with anti-money-laundering laws and works closely with regulators and police, spokesman Tom Fitzgerald says.

For four years, Mexican authorities have been fighting a losing battle against the cartels. The police are often two steps behind the criminals. Near the southeastern corner of Texas, in Matamoros, more than 50 combat troops surround a police station.

US officers take two suspected drug traffickers inside for questioning. Nearby, two young men wearing white T-shirts and baggy pants watch and whisper into radios.



These are los halcones (the falcons), whose job is to let the cartel bosses know what the police are doing.
 






BILLIONS MOVED ACROSS BORDERS ROUTINELY - THERE IS NO CHANGE


While the police are outmaneuvered and outgunned, ordinary Mexicans live in fear. Rojas, the man who lives in the Tijuana slum near the border fence, recalls cowering in his home as smugglers shot it out with the police.

"The only way to survive is to stay out of the way and hope the violence, the bullets, don't come for you," Rojas says.

To make their criminal enterprises work, the drug cartels of Mexico need to move billions of dollars across borders. That's how they finance the purchase of drugs, planes, weapons and safe houses, Senator Gonzalez says.


"They are multinational businesses, after all", says Gonzalez, as he slowly loads his revolver at his desk in his Mexico City office. "And they cannot work without a bank."

MonsantoRare film clip shows George H. W. Bush plotting with Monsanto to use US government to spread GMO imperialism

by J. D. Heyes http://www.naturalnews.com/z051180_George_HW_Bush_GMOs_Monsanto.html

(NaturalNews) Supporters of genetically modified or engineered foods want you to believe that the concept is no big deal and that humans have been cross-breeding and "modifying" food for centuries.
In reality, however, GMO seeds and foods created in a lab are far different than the traditional hybrid crop. In fact, the latter has only been in existence for a few decades.

If it weren't for the intense lobbying of St. Louis-based biotech giant Monsanto, GMOs would likely never have been introduced at all in the United States.

AltHealthWorks reports that in 1986, four executives from Monsanto visited the White House to see then-Vice President George H. W. Bush with the objective of gaining a valuable ally in the most powerful government in the world. Although President Ronald Reagan still had two years left in his second term, it was already widely believed at that time that Bush the Elder would run for the presidency in 1988.


Betting on a deregulation president

Reagan's administration was known for many accomplishments: improving the economy, strengthening the military, and dealing decisively with a Soviet Union whose power and influence was waning. However, Reagan was also a deregulator; if there was red tape he could cut in Washington in order to benefit business, industry and the economy in general, he would gladly do it.

Enter Monsanto, a company that wanted to get in on the deregulation bandwagon of the era.

AltHealthWorks reported:

One year later, Bush took the bait and paid a visit to the company's headquarters for a media event that included personal time with company scientists and reps.

Monsanto's reps wanted Bush to help them get their dangerously untested GMOs to market, and pleaded with him...to help make it happen.

What Bush said in response gave rise to a culture of blissful ignorance and irresponsibility that allowed Monsanto's controversial "frankencrops" to spread virtually unopposed ever since.


The company had tens of millions of dollars at stake and a number of regulatory hurdles to overcome as the Department of Agriculture painstakingly went through its regulatory approval process.

In 1987, Monsanto found itself in a difficult position. The company desperately wanted to begin testing their GMO crops in a live environment – a farm in Illinois – but they needed USDA approval in order to move forward.

Initially, Monsanto executives were ready to introduce GMOs slowly. However, the company grew increasingly frustrated by the approval process and instead opted to pursue a more aggressive policy of "eliminating what White House hardliners called 'bureaucratic hurdles' like health and environmental safety testing, which were Monsanto's key problems," according to narrator and director Marie-Monique Robin in the film, The World According to Monsanto.

In a clip that appears in the film, Bush is seen meeting with Monsanto scientists and reps as cameras from the media flash and reporters scratch notes. One scientist proceeds to explain the basics of how GMO foods are created.

The seven words that changed it all

"...We take DNA, cut it apart, mix different pieces together and then rejoin them, splice them back together," he says. "This tube contains DNA that was made from a bacterium..."

That leads Bush to respond with a question: "This will lead you have a stronger plant or a plant that will lead you to...?"

"In this case it resists the herbicide," the Monsanto rep says. Another rep adds, "We have a fabulous herbicide."

They were talking about Roundup, the glyphosate-containing product whose main ingredient was recently declared a likely human carcinogen by the World Health Organization.

This is followed by seven words that will eventually change the game in favor of Monsanto. The clip shows Bush laughing and saying of Monsanto's pleas to hasten the regulatory process, "Call me...we're in the dereg business." Then he adds, "Maybe we can help."

With that, the rise of the GMO industry in the U.S. began, and as many have demonstrated, it is growing at the expense of the U.S. consumer.

Towards the end of the clip, Bush's vice president, Dan Quayle, makes an announcement that describes the real reason that GMOs were fast-tracked in the U.S. even though other countries are banning them.

See the film clip and view Bush's seven infamous words here.

Sources include:

AltHealthWorks.com

YouTube.com

NaturalNews.com

BLACK BOX SCIENCE: Monsanto shills insist science should not be subject to public scrutiny... total secrecy now demanded by science totalitariansscience

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews http://www.naturalnews.com/051183_black_box_science_Kevin_Folta_scientific_totalitarians.html

(NaturalNews) In the aftermath of the explosive revelations that university scientists across America have been secretly colluding with Monsanto while publicly proclaiming they are "independent" observers, the scientific community is now on the path of committing credibility suicide.

The Freedom of Information Act law invoked by the US Right to Know campaign to acquire the email records of publicly funded university professors is now being targeted by the Monsanto-funded science shills who decry public scrutiny as "harassment" of scientists.

Across the quack science blogs, websites and corrupt science journal news sites, these Monsanto shills are now claiming that science should not be subject to public scrutiny. Total secrecy is required for scientific integrity, we're now hilariously told.

Science, in other words, must be conducted in a secret black box in order for it to be "real" science. Incredibly, this is now the publicly stated position of this entire class of university prostitutes and Monsanto shills: Science conducted with transparency should not be allowed at all!

UCLA urges professors to destroy evidence before the taxpayers can find it

"Deeply troubled by calls by some in science to reign in FOIA. We need more, not less, disclosure. If industry ties innocent, why hide them?" tweeted Michael Eisen on this topic (Michael Eisen, PhD, professor of genetics, genomics and development at UC Berkeley). He went on to explain that "@UCLA encourages faculty to routinely delete emails and documents to avoid public records disclosures."

"If you do not need to keep communications, routinely dispose of those records," urges a UCLA records request guide for science staff.

The guide, written in a Clintonesque tone that calls for shredding evidence -- Clinton "server wipe" anyone? -- directs UCLA staff members to destroy sensitive emails before the public tries to get access to them under California's Public Records Act (CPRA).

UCLA, like nearly all universities, gladly accepts huge donations from wealthy corporations that have successfully overrun academia with their corporate agendas. Teaching university faculty how to destroy emails and other evidence before such evidence is ever requested by the public is an essential strategy for maintaining the secrecy of the corporate-funded black box science taking place at these corrupted institutions.

The very institutions funded by the taxpayers, in other words, do not believe those taxpayers have any right to know what sort of twisted "science" is taking place behind their closed doors. Scientific secrecy is now a pillar of the twisted institution of modern science which claims to be honest, open and accessible to anyone. In reality, much of it is a secret cabal of corporate-funded academic prostitutes who consider scrutiny to be a form of "harassment" or even "violence" against them.

They despise transparency and viciously attack anyone who calls for it. They hate the public, they hate open discussion of science, and they absolutely hate anyone reading their secret emails where they admit being total sellouts to Monsanto.

"I'm glad to sign on to whatever you like, or write whatever you like," Kevin Folta told Monsanto operatives in his once-secret emails.

"It's a pleasure shilling with you," adds Camille D. Ryan, B.Comm., Ph.D., Independent Research Consultant and Public Speaker, Professional Affiliate, Department of Bioresource Policy, Business & Economics College of Agriculture University of Saskatchewan Canada.

Using his fraudulent cover story, Kevin Folta even managed to scam The Atlantic, which printed a hit piece on the Food Babe by quoting Kevin Folta as their primary source. What The Atlantic didn't seem to realize is that Folta was parroting Monsanto propaganda spoon-fed to him by Monsanto's P.R. firm (which specializes in character assassination hit pieces against clean food activists).

Maybe next, Bill Nye is going to change his name to "Bill Nye, the Black Box Science Guy" where nobody gets to see how science is actually conducted.

Monsanto shills like Kevin Folta and Jon Entine want to conduct science the same way sausage is made: behind closed doors, using mysterious ingredients that are probably full of crap and definitely not something you want to swallow.

And so SCIENCE truly becomes a dark religion after all: the Science Sith

What's so hilarious about all this is that, by insisting on absolute secrecy and black box operations, today's academic science excludes itself from the very definition of "science" in the first place.

Real science is always and forever open to publicly scrutiny. Real science welcomes questions, challenges and public discourse. Real science wants to involve everyone at every level and isn't afraid to reveal its process, its findings, or its discussions.

But FAKE science is afraid of the light. Fake science hates transparency and answers to no one. Fake science is conducted in darkness and secrecy, hiding its process and conclusions (and emails) from the public. Fake science is shouted at you by the arrogant high priests of science who, much like the high priests of some ancient religion, insist that they alone can interpret the cosmos (and you must obey their interpretations, see?).

So what is the Monsanto science now being conducted at universities across America by academic prostitutes like Kevin Folta? Well, it's FAKE science, of course. It's black box science, conducted in secrecy by academic liars and intellectual whores who adamantly deny financial ties to the very corporations that are funding them.

Monsanto science, it turns out, isn't science at all. It's a totalitarian regime that demands absolute secrecy, blind obedience and total protection from public scrutiny... all things that categorically disqualify it from being a legitimate science at all. If Kevin Folta is practicing "science," then the KKK teaches racial harmony and Kim Jong-un is the United Nations ambassador for liberty.

Watching "science" commit credibility suicide by the day

What we are really watching unfold here, dare I say, is the suicide of science and the wholesale, deliberate abandonment of anything resembling credibility among these academic scientists. They have now decided that they don't need integrity, trust, transparency or legitimacy. Why should they? After all, they have totalitarianism, demands for obedience, censorship and the intimidation of academics who refuse to conform and obey.

Modern academic science is now an exercise in totalitarian corporate malfeasance and douchebaggery. It makes a mockery of itself... like a cartoon character looking in the mirror and trying to imitate some other cartoon character. The loyalty and believability that "science" has long enjoyed when it actually welcomed public discourse and honest transparency is rapidly dwindling away.

Every hour that the scientific community doesn't denounce people like Kevin Folta of the University of Florida's financial ties to biotech herbicide giants, it loses a little more credibility among the well informed. Even long-time defenders of science now find themselves with jaws dropped to the floor, reading that Monsanto shills are demanding total scientific secrecy while accusing transparency advocates of being "terrorists."

Incredibly, many of America's university scientists exhibit striking intellectual parallels to religious extremists: They proclaim themselves to be exclusively correct on all matters, by God, and anyone who disagrees with them must be destroyed at all costs. Moreover, they don't have to explain anything to you, nor reveal their decision-making processes. They believe that they are divinely granted the exclusive authority of "correctness," and by faithfully worshipping their belief in their twisted corporate science, they actually expose themselves as scientific fundamentalists... not real scientists at all.

Scientific fundamentalism is a religion, not a science

That's the real term we need to recognize here. What you are witnessing today across America's universities, and the whoring out of academia, and the aggressive demands for total secrecy and blind obedience is nothing more than scientific fundamentalism.

It's a RELIGION, not a science, and even though it borrows words and concepts from the realm of science, it behaves like the kind of fundamentalist religion you might see practiced in Turkey. This religion demands unquestioning obedience and, even more importantly, it answers to no one.

The religion of scientism cannot be questioned, audited or subjected to public scrutiny. It is carried out in secret, using secret funding sources, secret indoctrination sessions, secret emails and secret agendas. Any who refuse to surrender to scientific fundamentalism are branded "anti-science" or, as Kevin Folta likes to say, "terrorists."

This scientific fundamentalism even demands that consumers be kept in the dark about what they're eating. The honest labeling of GMOs for food products is viciously opposed by these science fundamentalists on the grounds that consumers should not know about all this incredible science that went into the food they're eating. Yep, the genetic engineers are making all our food more nutritious and abundant, we're told, but all this incredibly "good news" should be hidden from the public for some reason, because the public shouldn't have the right to know.

That's the new "science" of Monsanto and its academic whores like Kevin Folta: absolute secrecy, mandatory consumer ignorance and a brand of intellectual protectionism that smacks of the Third Reich's IG Farben saga of "scientific" chemical experiments on Jewish prisoners of war.

Scientific secrecy leads to abuse of power and crimes against people

From scientific secrecy comes scientific totalitarianism. And from scientific totalitarianism come crimes against humanity such as the U.S. govt.-funded NIH medical experiments on Guatemalan prisoners or Tuskegee experiments on blacks. Angry, arrogant science whores like Kevin Folta would have felt right at home being part of these heinous "scientific" crimes against humanity, I'd imagine. The University of Florida should be proud to have such a person representing them in the public arena of secretive sellout science.

My advice in all this? When the instigators of so-called science begin to demand absolute secrecy while aggressively attacking transparency and open discussion, it's time to shut down their bogus science and redirect that public money into something more honest.