Saturday, April 21, 2018

False Flag Mass Shootings: Stages of Awakening

false flag mass shootings
False flag mass shootings occur with regularity, so they must be working to meet the aims of the NWO orchestrators. True solutions will only come once we pass through the stages of awakening.

False flag mass shootings

continue to be a favored strategy used by the New World Order (NWO) controllers to further their agenda of fear and domination. It seems that every time a gap of time opens up since the last one, the US public is again hit with another incident. This shows that these events must be working to achieve the intended objectives of their orchestrators. For those who wonder when false flag mass shootings will become an ineffective social engineering tool, the answer is simple: only once enough people awaken to the deception, bring consciousness to their reactions to these events, and intentionally respond in new ways. Having said that, there are various stages of awakening to pass through regarding these events. It is only from a broader perspective that we can truly hope to stop the effectiveness of these events, designed to play with and exploit the emotions of the average person.

False Flag Mass Shootings – Awakening Stage 1: It’s the Gun

The first stage is the knee-jerk reaction: “Something has to be done! Let’s get rid of all the guns!” However well-meaning these sentiments are, they lack the basic recognition that guns in and of themselves are a tool, which can be used constructively or destructively. Yes, guns are designed to shoot bullets to injure or kill, but nonetheless, they can be used as a deterrent or for other defensive purposes. For those who hunt, or simply defend their livestock from other predatory animals, guns serve a constructive purpose. To focus on the tool or instrument, rather than the intent and mindset of the person that uses them, is only approaching the issue from a very shallow perspective.
I am not a typical gun rights advocate; I don’t like guns. I recently read a bumper sticker that stated “If guns cause crime, pencils cause misspellings.” It’s humorous, yet at the same time, it’s undeniable that guns are a tool of violence. I understand that violence begets more violence. By owning and carrying a gun, you may be attracting or drawing in situations where gun use will be likely or required. However, I am a firm believer in gun rights, the 2nd Amendment and the decentralization of power in all its aspects. I trust that the overwhelming majority of gun owners are sensible, moral people who exercise extreme care in handling a gun, which is more than we can say for the US Government, whose agents are trained to kill foreigners (US military) or to kill its own citizens (trigger-happy US cops). US police killings account for far more annual American deaths than false flag mass shootings.
Here are 7 reasons that gun control is short-sighted, reactionary and fails to achieve the objectives that people want:
– gun control doesn’t guarantee that criminals won’t get guns. Criminals will break the law and find a way to acquire them illegally. It only limits gun ownership by law-abiding citizens;
– gun control punishes the respectful, decent majority of gun owners for the alleged actions of a tiny few crazies;
– gun control centralizes power. It puts exclusive rights of gun ownership in the hands of the government, which people already know to be extremely untrustworthy. Why is the corrupt, deceitful and violent government somehow more likely to protect you, or do you less harm, than your average fellow citizen?
– it plays into the broader scheme of citizen disarmament which was carried out by past tyrants (Hitler, Stalin, Mao). History shows that this mostly served to solidify their power, thus making people in those nations less safe;
– gun control emboldens burglars and other criminals, who knowing that guns will be illegal and obtaining some for themselves anyway, can carry out more attacks, since their victims are less able to defend themselves;
– it abandons a right that our forefathers had the wisdom to instate in the Bill of Rights. The real reason for the 2nd Amendment was not to protect those who wanted guns for hunting, but rather as a last recourse for citizens to overthrow an out-of-control government that no longer served them; and
– gun control is a key plank of the overarching NWO agenda known as Agenda 21 or Agenda 2030. The idea is force people into human habitats like smart cities where they will be monitored 24/7, dependent on government for everything and without the rights they currently have today.
Psychiatric Drugs
Psychiatric drugs are provably linked to violence and mass shootings. Image credit: David Dees.

False Flag Mass Shootings – Awakening Stage 2: Pharmaceutical, Psychiatric and Psychotropic Drugs

The next stage of awakening around false flag mass shootings is to look more closely at the mindset of the alleged shooter. More and more people are starting to recognize the obvious connection between pharmaceuticals – often psychiatric and psychotropic drugs – and mass shootings. These drugs are designed to numb you out, detach you from reality and kill your ability to feel emotion – including empathy. With empathy gone, it’s anything goes.
There is much evidence of the psych drug-mass shooter connection. I wrote the following in a 2013 article Psychiatric Drugs and Mass Shootings: The Definitive Connection:
“The link between violence (especially gun murder) and pharmaceutical drugs has been well established. [The former website] contain [ed] a long list of documented instances where hundreds of people have been wounded or killed by gunshot at the hands of someone who was under the influence of SSRI antidepressant psychiatric medication – Prozac, Celexa, Paxil and Zoloft being the most common. The list (which is not exhaustive) shows that psychiatric drugs are not only connected to gun violence – they have also been implicated in numerous instances of knife attacks, bomb threats, bizarre behavior, assault and hitting victims with a car. According to CCHR, between 2004 and 2011, there have been more than 11,000 reports placed via the U.S. FDA’s MedWatch system of psychiatric drug side effects related to violence, including 300 cases of homicide, close to 3,000 cases of mania and more than 7,000 cases of aggression. There is evidence that psychiatric drugs were involved in the all of the mass shootings at Columbine (1999), Virginia (2007), Aurora (2012) and Sandy Hook (2012).”
Jon Rappoport quotes psychiatrist and author Dr. Peter Breggin:
“With Luvox there is some evidence of a four-percent rate for mania in adolescents. Mania, for certain individuals, could be a component in grandiose plans to destroy large numbers of other people. Mania can go over the hill to psychosis.”
“In his book, Toxic Psychiatry, Dr. Breggin discusses the subject of drug combinations: “Combining antidepressants [e.g., Prozac, Luvox, Paxil] and psychostimulants [e.g., Ritalin] increases the risk of cardiovascular catastrophe, seizures, sedation, euphoria, and psychosis. Withdrawal from the combination can cause a severe reaction that includes confusion, emotional instability, agitation, and aggression.” Children are frequently medicated with this combination, and when we highlight such effects as aggression, psychosis, and emotional instability, it is obvious that the result is pointing toward the very real possibility of violence.”
In true problem-reaction-solution style, some are now advocating more authority for mental health agencies.

False Flag Mass Shootings – Awakening Stage 3: Mental Health and the Culture of Violence

Moving beyond blaming just the weapon, or even just the shooter, some people now believe that the deepest cause for these false flag mass shootings is the culture of violence. We are inundated with violence, especially in the form of Hollywood movies and video games which are now becoming so realistic it is easy for the brain to confuse the two. We are the imagination of ourselves; we become what stories we tell to ourselves and our children. As long as our hall of heroes is full of men (and women) shooting others with guns, we will worship and emulate these “heroes.”
This culture of violence creates a mindset of “might is right”, “force is justified” and “peace through strength.” This last phrase was adopted by the US government/military (e.g. Ronald Reagan) but is very old. It was even used by leaders such as the Roman Emperor Hadrian in the first century AD. The idea is that you have to be strong, tough, macho and aggressive to deter anyone else from attacking you, and that this translates into peace. This is another shallow idea which fails to understand that genuine peace can only be created through a win/win scenario, not through a situation where others harbor feelings of fear, resentment and hate towards you, for that is powder keg waiting to blow.
This culture of violence also affects people’s mental health on an individual level, which is exacerbated by psych drugs as pointed out in #2 above. This leads on to the next stage of awakening around false flag mass shootings: mind control.
False Flag Mass Shootings Mind Control

False Flag Mass Shootings – Awakening Stage 4: Mind Control

Mind control is a massive topic which has a very direct relevance to false flag mass shootings, because so many of these patsy shooters show evidence of being mentally influenced and tampered with. Mind controlled assassins can be traced way back to the Cult of the Assassins in the Middle East during the Middle Ages. In more recent history, the CIA, using Nazi research and scientists under Project Paperclip, developed MK Ultra starting in 1953, which was so large it had 149 sub-projects. The fruits of this operation begun to pay off in the 1960s, when the CIA used their mind control techniques to cultivate assassins such as those used in the murders of JFK, RFK, MLK and John Lennon.
False flag mass shootings James Holmes
False flag mass shootings: James Holmes with all his links to mind control
These days the techniques have no doubt been perfected. James Holmes, the alleged gunman of the 2012 Aurora Colorado shootings, looked incredibly drugged up and mind controlled during his time in court. There are also links among James Holmes’ family, DARPA and mind control. Aaron Alexis, the Washington Navy Yard shooter of 2013, said a statement that “he heard voices in his head” which may well be a reference to the electronic and psychotronic weaponry deployed by the Intelligence Agencies to mind control the shooters. Alexis reported that “individuals were speaking to him through the floor and ceiling and using “some sort of microwave machine” to send vibrations through the ceiling, “penetrating his body so he could not fall asleep.”
When you understand the scale on which these events operate, a knee-jerk reaction of advocating gun control seems absurd. The evidence shows that the government is literally mind controlling people to commit heinous acts without being fully conscious of it! Why are we wasting our energy and attention on the type of weapon used when this type and scale of evil is being perpetrated?
It is worth revisiting the testimony of TIs (Targeted Individuals) such as Bryan Kofron, whose account I wrote about in Total Individual Control Technology: Insider Exposes How You & Your DNA are Being Targeted. However, this is not the end of the story. Next, we need to look at unpeel another layer of the deception of false flag mass shootings.

False Flag Mass Shootings – Awakening Stage 5: False Flags

At this stage of awakening, you begin to see that there is a large force directing events, which renders the whole gun control debate in a completely new light.
The official narratives of these mass shootings never add up. They are full of more holes than the proverbial Swiss cheese. As I covered in the article The False Flag Formula – 15 Ways to Detect a False Flag Operation, false flag mass shootings contain many elements that prove the events are orchestrated in advance by the government, such as drills at the same place at the same (or nearby) time, foreknowledge, conflicting eyewitness accounts, witnesses reporting multiple shooters when the official story is only 1 shooter, the rapid way in which the MSM names the alleged shooter or patsy, the supposed shot and kill rate of the patsy (who is often young, weak or overweight with no military training), the destruction of evidence and so on.
False flag mass shootings need to be seen in the context of false flag operations in general, which have been the instigators of countless wars, such as the 1898 Spanish-American War, World War 1, World War 2 (Pearl Harbor), the Vietnam War (Gulf of Tonkin), 9/11 and more. It’s always the same trick; someone wants war but doesn’t want to be seen as the aggressor, so they make it look they are being attacked and thus only acting in self-defense.
I could go on for a very long time but here is the point: the government is carrying out these operations. Why are we so focused on supposedly protecting our safety by advocating giving more control and weaponry to the very same government, which then has the effect of disempowers us further, thus doing the exact opposite of what we want?

False Flag Mass Shootings – Awakening Stage 6: False Flag Hoaxes

There are steps beyond just seeing mass shootings as false flags. We live a world of such immense fakery – Everything is Fake! – that we have to question everything, because unfortunately our eyes and senses are easy to deceive. This is only going to become even worse as technology develops. Face fakery/invention is easy; video fakery is easy; holograms are now so good that it’s hard to tell the difference between them and reality.
Sandy Hook was a watershed event in the history of mass shootings, because for the first time, awakened individuals had to ask whether there were actually real victims, i.e. in other words, whether it was a false flag (with real victims) or a false flag hoax (with no real victims). Fake blood, fake injuries and smiling & laughing crisis actors show that these events are at least partially (and perhaps fully) staged.
From the perspective of the controllers, having an entirely staged event with no real victims is “cleaner”, because you can control everything down to the last detail (exactly who gets shot, who “dies”, etc.) without worrying about a situation getting out of hand or possible lawsuits in the future. If there are no real victims or real dead kids, there are no parents to sue the government, right?
The NWO manipulators who orchestrate these events are very cunning. They have deliberately targeted schools as the object of many false flag mass shootings, so as to inspire the maximum amount of fear and chaos, which is their life force energy. Another benefit for them is that anyone who suggests these events are not merely false flags, but actually false flag hoaxes, is immediately ridiculed and/or censored in many ways, including being viciously attacked for being insensitive to the “dead” kids. This adds to the atmosphere of self-censorship where there are certain “no go” zones for researchers (and ultimately “no think”) zones which is the exact goal, of course, of political correctness.

The Bigger Picture

False flag mass shootings are all about fear, chaos and control. They are designed to usher in the New World Order. They induce an enormous amount of fear in people who worry that they or their children could be struck at any time; they create huge emotional upheaval and chaos to rip people out of their grounded, rational or sensible way of seeing the world to create a skewed perspective; and they aim to deceive people into giving up control.
False flag mass shootings will continue to be rolled out against a bamboozled and unsuspecting public as long as the deception remains profitable and effective in achieving its intended goals. However, as more and more people awaken to the game and begin to see the bigger picture, these events will become less effective. I see signs that people are beginning to question more, e.g. with the February 14th, 2018 Florida high school shooting earlier this year, people were asking questions about the psych drug-shooter connection in the immediate aftermath. Hopefully the awakening will quickly continue to the next stages en masse.


Wednesday, April 11, 2018

A new move out of India requires all citizens to have their fingers printed, and their eyes scanned in order to use public services like schools, grocery stores, the bank, or anything that fits in that same category.
Things are getting quite hectic on planet Earth these days. It seems that any action taken by the government receives a harsh reaction from the citizenry. But who am I talking about when I say “government?” I’m talking about an international group of people who yield power and control over multiple global governments, and as a result, dictate their political/economic policy for their own selfish purposes.
If you’re thinking that this is a mere ‘conspiracy theory,’ join the line, you’re not alone. It’s unfortunate that people would view it in this manner but it’s also not surprising given we have been kept in the dark purposely.
But the truth is, numerous politicians have been telling us for decades about this shadow government. They have referenced it openly and publicly. I often draw from a quote given by Theodore Roosevelt that illustrates my point quite well, so I apologize if you’ve seen it from me before.
“Political parties exist to secure responsible government and to execute the will of the people. From these great tasks both of the old parties have turned aside. Instead of instruments to promote the general welfare, they have become the tools of corrupt interests which use them impartially to serve their selfish purposes. Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people… To destroy this invisible government, to dissolve the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of the day.”
The point is, when it comes to governments making decisions, it’s often not the result of a democracy or a gathering of minds who are concerned for the planet and the human race. Instead, it’s about political and economic dominance, and actions taken which really have ulterior motives behind them – with 9/11 being one of the the best examples.
Tracking the global citizenry is nothing new, especially since the Edward Snowden leaks came out showing that the monitoring of civilians is truly global. All of our actions are monitored, and everything is tracked, and when we ask why, we’re told that it’s for the sake of ‘national security.’ Every-time that word pops up in my writing, I feel deeply inclined to share this particular sentiment from John F. Kennedy:
“The dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts, far outweigh the dangers that are cited to justify it….There is  very grave danger than an announced need for increased security, will be ceased upon by those anxious to expand it’s meaning to the very limits of censorship and concealment. That I do not tend to permit, so long as it’s in my control.”
The justifications for their actions are not always as they’re told in press or media. This new move from India that requires all citizens to have their fingers printed and eyes scanned to use public services likely has ulterior motives. It’s similar to not being able to send your child to public school if they’re not vaccinated. Do as we say or don’t get basic public services.
As the New York Times points out:
“Technology has given governments around the world new tools to monitor their citizens. In China, the government is rolling out ways to use facial recognition and big data to track people, aiming to inject itself further into everyday life. Many countries, including Britain, deploy closed-circuit cameras to monitor their populations….But India’s program is in a league of its own, both in the mass collection of biometric data and in the attempt to link it to everything — traffic tickets, bank accounts, pensions, even meals for undernourished schoolchildren.”
Obviously, Indian citizens have already been criticizing the news, saying that the government will gain complete access into the lives of all citizens. This is a big problem, and something that has existed for a long time, I point you again to the Snowden links mentioned above, but whistle-blowers before Snowden exposed these types of things well before he did. William Binney is one of multiple examples.
What’s the justification for such action? According to Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Modi, it’s simply a universal, easy to use ID, that will “reduce this country’s endemic corruption and help bring even the most illiterate into the digital age.”
Nandan Nilekani, the billionaire who was contracted by the government to build the system nearly 10 years ago, told the New York Times that, “It’s the equivalent of building interstate highways… If the government invested in building a digital public utility and that is made available as platform, then you actually can create major innovations around that.”
This isn’t far too different than proposals that’ve been made, by some very prominent people, to actually chip the entire citizenry to make it convenient for one to access their license, bankcard or passport. Multiple corporations are pushing to microchip the human race. In fact, microchip implants in humans are already on the market.
For example, an American company called Applied Digital Solutions (ADS) has developed one approximately the size of a grain of rice, and has already had it approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for distribution and implementation.
Here’s a clip of Facebook executive and ex-DARPA Chief, Regina Dugan, promoting the idea of microchipping humans.

Have you ever heard of George Orwell’s 1984 ? It’s a cult classic book depicting a populace ruled by a political regime that persecutes individualism and independent critical thinking as “thoughtcrimes” that must be enforced by the “thought police.” This party seeks power above all and, through the propagandist Ministry of Truth, presents the people with their version of truth. Sound familiar?
Recently, reported that Amazon sold out of 1984, and within recent days it occupied the number one spot on Amazon’s best-selling books list. The rapid sell-out of the book were also reported by mainstream media outlets like CNN, only they tied it to Trump’s administration. The New York Times reported that this started when Kellyanne Conway, an adviser to Donald J. Trump, used a turn of phrase that struck some observers as reminiscent of the dystopian world of 1984.
The thing is, I believe it’s not really Donald Trump, but rather the “Deep State.”

Author Richard Dolan puts it quite well:
“If you are concerned about fascism coming to America, don’t look for a fist pounding demagogue. Look instead at a government that can read every email you have ever written, GPS you at any time, know your internet habits better than you do, surveil you literally wherever you go in any major city, and use your information against you if they decide, however loosely, that you are an enemy of the state. That is fascism, and the U.S. has been living that bipartisan nightmare for 15 years.”

An Orwellian State?

The state described in George Orwell’s books has been speculated to be in the works in our world for a long time, and there is good reason to believe that moves like this from India, or the Deep State, are simply part of a trend that we’ve seen continue for decades.
Our rights and liberties are constantly taken away, yet it is we who agree to this type of existence. That being said, we are manipulated. The idea of having to do this as a basic requirement to access our everyday needs and wants is scary. What’s even scarier is thinking about the idea that those needs and wants are not even ours, and that they’ve been programmed into us by ‘the man.’ Another word for it is ‘mass marketing.’
The good news is that more and more people across the globe are starting to wake up to all of the misinformation being spread on a daily basis, and that includes the agenda of those behind it. Even a decade ago, the mass populace was not as aware that all is not as it seems, and as a result of this mass awakening, our perception, our thoughts, and our collective consciousness is beginning to shift. We no longer see the world the way it has been presented to us, and we are starting to realize that simply waking up to all of the propaganda that surrounds us is creating big problems for the global elite. The very first step to changing a problem is to first recognize that problem, and we are still in that process.
This mass surveillance, and actions such as, only seem to create more problems, despite the fact that they are constantly praised by those who wish to implement them into our everyday way of life.


A few weeks ago I blogged about the latest in a long line of disappearances and mysterious deaths of physicians who buck the "standard narrative". In this case it was about the disappearance of CDC physician Dr. Timothy Cunningham, who disappeared on February 12 this year. Sadly, Dr. Cunningham's body has now been found, according to these two stories shared by Ms. N.C. and Mr. H.B.:
There's much here that does not add up. First, consider the fact that his body was only just recently discovered in the river not too far from his home, but in an area which had been previously thoroughly searched:
The muddy river spot where the officer was found wasn't too far from his house, but there weren't any roads or running trails nearby, so it's not clear exactly how Cunningham got in there. Police say they'd conducted a "very thorough" search of the riverbanks in that area on February 23, but didn't find any signs of the missing commander.
"We may never be able to tell you how he got into the river," O'Connor said. Doctors who've examined his body say there's no evidence of trauma or foul play, and they believe the cause of death is drowning.
OK... let me get this straight: Dr. Cunningham, a US Navy officer - a commander - supposedly drowned at some point, in a river near his home, but in an area which had been previously searched. Did the police simply miss seeing him before, or did Dr. Cunningham drown himself somewhere else? If so, how did his body get to where it was eventually found? Who transported it there, and why? If there is no foul play involved, why bother to move the body at all?
In short, I'm not buying for a moment that there's no "foul play". The above two cited paragraphs are so self-evidently c0ntradictory that I cannot imagine any competent district attorney not suspecting foul play.
There are other additional details that raise serious questions:
The family of Timothy J. Cunningham, 35, grew concerned after the Harvard-trained epidemiologist and US Navy officer wouldn't answer texts or calls. Driving over 600 miles from Maryland to Atlanta, Cunningham's parents gained access to his house where they found their son's phone, wallet and driver's license.
Quoted by the NYT, his father said that Commander Cunningham had “a lot going on” personally and professionally, and his most recent conversation with his son had left him worried.
The tone, and the numerous exchanges gave us reason to be concerned about Tim,” said Terrell Cunningham. “And I don’t know if it’s an instinct you have because it’s your child, but it was not a normal conversation and I was not comfortable.”
Cunningham's car was parked in the garage, while his dog - Mr. Bojangles, aka Bo, was left all by himself.
Cunningham left work at the CDC on Feb 12, 2018, claiming he was feeling sick.  When he was discovered, he was wearing his favorite jogging shoes:
The Atlanta Police Department confirmed to Business Insider that Timothy Cunningham's body was recovered in the Chattahoochee River in northwest Atlanta. Cunningham was wearing his favorite jogging shoes when he was found by a group of fishermen, police said.
So apparently Dr. Cunningham left work, drove home, parked his car in his garage, put on his jogging clothes, and went for a jog(in spite of having left work feeling sick), leaving all his personal identification in his house, along with his dog, and phone. This is, again, a little incredible to me, for one would think that Dr. Cunningham would want at least some means of self-identification, or a means to summon help if he needed to; so why leave his phone and identification documents at home? Did Dr. Cunningham leave work that day - not because he was feeling sick - but rather, to take a meeting with someone? Was he instructed not to bring any identification or phone?
There's much here that disturbs and very little that consoles, and there's no doubt in my mind that Dr. Cunningham was the victim of foul play. Given his parents' concerns over their last phone conversations with their son, the whole thing suggests that Dr Cunningham may have learned, or suspected, something, but what that may have been, we do not presently know. A clue, however, is perhaps afforded by a glimpse at his brief CDC bio:
What I find intriguing about the biographical note are the following statements: "Dr. Cunningham trained with CDC as an Epidemic Intelligence Service officer. His research has been oriented towards understanding health differences related to race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, and geography. Dr. Cunningham has also deployed for numerous public health emergencies, including Superstorm Sandy, Ebola, and Zika." (Emphasis added)
In other words, Dr. Cunningham would have been in a unique position to notice emergent health care trends in various demographic groups, including anything suggestive of biological or genetic warfare.
I don't know about you, but I personally think the Cunningham family is entirely correct to be suspicious of the whole thing.     

Sunday, April 8, 2018

Dan Cromer: OPERATION HOGGWASH: No Death Records for the 17 Parkland Victims

OPERATION HOGGWASH: No Death Records for the 17 Parkland Victims

by Dan Cromer
[Editor's note: We reach a point where the evidence of fraud is so massive that only those who are involved in the scam or incapable of reason remain in a state of denial. As Dan asks in conclusion, Why did Nikolas Cruz confess to the Broward County Sheriff's? What death records did the Broward County Sheriff's Office use to charge Nikolas Cruz with 17 counts of premeditated murder and 17 counts of attempted murder? How can so many officials be so committed to deceiving the public and depriving Americans of their rights under the Constitution? When are these staged attacks going to end?]

According to the official narrative, on February 14, 2018, a mass shooting occurred at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida. Seventeen people were killed and seventeen more were wounded, making it one of the world's deadliest school massacres. The perpetrator, 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz, was identified by witnesses and arrested shortly afterward. He confessed, according to the Broward County Sheriff's Office. He was charged with 17 counts of premeditated murder and 17 counts of attempted murder.

Curiously,, the world's largest online history resource does not show death records for any of the seventeen victims. This database is a compilation of obituaries published in U.S. newspapers, collected from various online sources. For researchers, obituaries are genealogical goldmines, including information such as names, dates, places of birth and death, marriage information, and family relationships. Ancestry's U.S., Cemetery and Funeral Home Collection (1847-2018) provided the following search results:

1. Alyssa Alhadeff, 14

2. Scott Beigel, 35

3. Martin Duque, 14


4. Nicholas Dworet, 17

5. Aaron Feis, 37

6. Jaime Guttenberg, 14

7. Chris Hixon, 49

8. Luke Hoyer, 15

9. Cara Loughran, 14

10. Gina Montalto, 14

11. Joaquin Oliver, 17

12. Alaina Petty, 14

13. Meadow Pollack, 18

14. Helena Ramsay, 17

15. Alex Schachter, 14

16. Carmen Schentrup, 16

17. Peter Wang, 15

So, based on these results, one can ask: Why did Nikolas Cruz confess to the Broward County Sheriff's? What death records did the Broward County Sheriff's Office use to charge Nikolas Cruz with 17 counts of premeditated murder and 17 counts of attempted murder? Like so many of these "mass shooting events", we are left with more questions than answers.

UPDATE (8 April 2018):

In their haste to add these records, now shows two death records for Aaron Feis indicating that he died on February 14 and on February 15:

Of course, Aaron Feis is the "heroic" coach that selflessly shielded bullets to protect his students and subsequently died (twice).  Just days later, he was photographed attending a Parkland student's "funeral".

I am in the process of requesting the Death Certificates from the Florida Department of Health, Broward County Vital Statistics Office.

Dan Cromer, an IT expert, was the first to discern that the audio from the Las Vegas concert was too high quality and had been prerecorded with sound effects of machine guns and military weapons, which were being complemented by special visual effects and an audience seeded with crisis actors. His research is based upon pubic records. Please contact the editor regarding any possible discrepancies.

Do Americans Live in a False Reality Created by Orchestrated Events?

Most people who are aware and capable of thought have given up on what is called the “mainstream media.”

by Dr. Paul Craig Roberts

The presstitutes have destroyed their credibility by helping Washington to lie —“Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction,” “Iranian nukes,” “Assad’s use of chemical weapons,” “Russian invasion of Ukraine,” and so forth.

The “mainstream media” has also destroyed its credibility by its complete acceptance of whatever government authorities say about alleged “terrorist events,” such as 9/11 and Boston Marathon Bombing, or alleged mass shootings such as Sandy Hook and San Bernardino.

Despite glaring inconsistencies, contradictions, and security failures that seem too unlikely to be believable, the “mainstream media” never asks questions or investigates. It merely reports as fact whatever authorities say.

The sign of a totalitarian or authoritarian state is a media that feels no responsibility to investigate and to find the truth, accepting the role of propagandist instead. The entire Western media has been in the propaganda mode for a long time.

In the US the transformation of journalists into propagandists was completed with the concentration of a diverse and independent media in six mega-corporations that are no longer run by journalists.

As a consequence, thoughtful and aware people increasingly rely on alternative media that does question, marshall facts, and offers analysis in place of an unbelievable official story line.

The prime example is 9/11. Large numbers of experts have destroyed the official story that has no factual evidence in its behalf.

However, even without the hard evidence that 9/11 truthers have provided, the official story gives itself away.

We are supposed to believe that a few Saudi Arabians with no technology beyond box cutters and no support from any government’s intelligence service were able to outwit the massive surveillance technology created by DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and NSA (National Security Agency) and deal the most humiliating blow to a superpower ever delivered in human history.

Moreover, they were able to do this without the President of the United States, the US Congress, and the “mainstream media” demanding accountability for such a total failure of the high-tech national security state.

Instead of a White House led investigation of such a massive security failure, the White House resisted for more than one year any investigation whatsoever until finally giving in to demands from 9/11 families that could not be bought off and agreeing to a 9/11 Commission.

The Commission did not investigate but merely sat and wrote down the story told to it by the government.

Afterwards, the Commission’s chairman, co-chairman, and legal counsel wrote books in which they said that information was withheld from the Commission, that the Commission was lied to by officials of the government, and that the Commission “was set up to fail.”

Despite all of this, the presstitutes still repeat the official propaganda, and there remain enough gullible Americans to prevent accountability.

Competent historians know that false flag events are used to bring to fruition agendas that cannot otherwise be achieved.

9/11 gave the neoconservatives, who controlled the George W. Bush administration, the New Pearl Harbor that they said was necessary in order to launch their hegemonic military invasions of Muslim countries.

The Boston Marathon Bombing permitted a trial run of the American Police State, complete with shutting down a large American city, putting 10,000 armed troops and SWAT teams on the streets where the troops conducted house to house searches forcing the residents out of their homes at gunpoint.

This unprecedented operation was justified as necessary in order to locate one wounded 19 year old man, who clearly was a patsy.

There are so many anomalies in the Sandy Hook story that it has generated a cottage industry of skeptics. I agree that there are anomalies, but I don’t have the time to study the issue and come to my own conclusion. What I have noticed is that we are not given many good explanations of the anomalies.

For example, in this video made from the TV news coverage:

The video’s creator makes a case that the person who is the grieving father who lost his son is the same person outfitted in SWAT clothes at Sandy Hook following the shooting. The person is identified as a known actor.

Now, it seems to me that this is easy to test. The grieving father is known, the actor is known, and the authorities have to know who the SWAT team member is.

If these three people, who can pass for one another, can be assembled in one room at the same time, we can dismiss the expose claimed in this one video.

However, if three separate people cannot be produced together, then we must ask why this deception, which raises questions about the entire story. You can watch the entire video or just skip to the 9:30 mark and observe what appears to be the same person in two different roles.

The “mainstream media” has the ability to make these simple investigations, but does not. Instead, the “mainstream media” calls skeptics “conspiracy theorists.”

There is a book by Professor Jim Fetzer and Mike Palecek that says Sandy Hook was a FEMA drill to promote gun control and that no one died at Sandy Hook. The book was available on but was suddenly banned. Why ban a book?

Here is a free download of the book: I have not read the book and have no opinion.

Shocking FBI Report: No Deaths at Sandy Hook

I do know, however, that the police state that America is becoming certainly has a powerful interest in disarming the public. I also heard today a news report that people said to be parents of the dead children are bringing a lawsuit against the gun manufacturer, which is consistent with Fetzer’s claim.

Here is a Buzzsaw interview with Jim Fetzer. If the information Fetzer provides is correct, clearly the US government has an authoritarian agenda and is using orchestrated events to create a false reality for Americans in order to achieve the agenda.

It seems to me that Fetzer’s facts can be easily checked. If his facts check out, then a real investigation is required. If his facts do not check out, the official story gains credibility as Fetzer is one of the most energetic skeptics.

Fetzer cannot be dismissed as a kook. He graduated magna cum laude from Princeton University, has a Ph.D. from Indiana University and was Distinguished McKnight University Professor at the University of Minnesota until his retirement in 2006.

He has had a National Science Foundation fellowship, and he has published more than 100 articles and 20 books on philosophy of science and philosophy of cognitive science.

He is an expert in artificial intelligence and computer science and founded the international journal Minds and Machines. In the late 1990s, Fetzer was asked to organize a symposium on philosophy of mind.

For an intelligent person, the official stories of President Kennedy’s assassination and 9/11 are simply not believable, because the official stories are not consistent with the evidence and what we know.

Fetzer’s frustration with less capable and less observant people increasingly shows, and this works to his disadvantage.

It seems to me that if the authorities behind the official Sandy Hook story are secure with the official story, they would jump on the opportunity to confront and disprove Fetzer’s facts.

Moreover, somewhere there must be photographs of the dead children, but, like the alleged large number of recordings by security cameras of an airliner hitting the Pentagon, no one has ever seen them. At least not that I know of.

What disturbs me is that no one in authority or in the mainstream media has any interest in checking the facts. Instead, those who raise awkward matters are dismissed as conspiracy theorists.

Why this is damning is puzzling. The government’s story of 9/11 is a story of a conspiracy as is the government’s story of the Boston Marathon Bombing. These things happen because of conspiracies.

What is at issue is: whose conspiracy?

We know from Operation Gladio and Operation Northwoods that governments do engage in murderous conspiracies against their own citizens. Therefore, it is a mistake to conclude that governments do not engage in conspiracies.

One often hears the objection that if 9/11 was a false flag attack, someone would have talked.
Why would they have talked? Only those who organized the conspiracy would know. Why would they undermine their own conspiracy?

Recall William Binney. He developed the surveillance system used by NSA. When he saw that it was being used against the American people, he talked. But he had taken no documents with which to prove his claims, which saved him from successful prosecution but gave him no evidence for his claims.

This is why Edward Snowden took the documents and released them. Nevertheless, many see Snowden as a spy who stole national security secrets, not as a whistleblower warning us that the Constitution that protects us is being overthrown.

High level government officials have contradicted parts of the 9/11 official story and the official story that links the invasion of Iraq to 9/11 and to weapons of mass destruction. Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta contradicted Vice President Cheney and the official 9/11 story timeline.

Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill has said that overthrowing Saddam Hussein was the subject of the first cabinet meeting in the George W. Bush administration long before 9/11. He wrote it in a book and told it on CBS News’ 60 Minutes. CNN and other news stations reported it. But it had no effect.

Whistleblowers pay a high price. Many of them are in prison. Obama has prosecuted and imprisoned a record number. Once they are thrown in prison, the question becomes: “Who would believe a criminal?”

As for 9/11 all sorts of people have talked. Over 100 police, firemen and first responders have
reported hearing and experiencing a large number of explosions in the Twin Towers.

Maintenance personnel report experiencing massive explosions in the sub-basements prior to the building being hit by an airplane. None of this testimony has had any effect on the authorities behind the official story or on the presstitutes.

There are 2,300 architects and engineers who have written to Congress requesting a real investigation. Instead of the request being treated with the respect that 2,300 professionals deserve, the professionals are dismissed as “conspiracy theorists.”

An international panel of scientists have reported the presence of reacted and unreacted nanothermite in the dust of the World Trade Centers. They have offered their samples to government agencies and to scientists for confirmation. No one will touch it. The reason is clear.

Today science funding is heavily dependent on the federal government and on private companies that have federal contracts. Scientists understand that speaking out about 9/11 means the termination of their career.

The government has us where it wants us — powerless and disinformed. Most Americans are too uneducated to be able to tell the difference between a building falling down from asymetrical damage and one blowing up.

Mainstream journalists cannot question and investigate and keep their jobs. Scientists cannot speak out and continue to be funded.

Truth telling has been shoved off into the alternative Internet media where I would wager the government runs sites that proclaim wild conspiracies, the purpose of which is to discredit all skeptics.

About the author: Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide following.