EARTHQUAKES, ROTATION, AND HIGH OCTANE SPECULATION
A
few days ago I blogged about "data correlation experiments" and
""non-obvious correlated systems" and so on. Well, this week, when going
through all the emails and articles that people have sent me, I've
noticed that some people were focused on earthquakes, and a few people
sent along versions of this story, wondering what was going on:
Initially,
some versions of this story were reporting that this quake was felt in
Baltimore and regions of southeastern Pennsylvania. When I received
these articles about this quake (or quakes), I was curious, but wasn't
inclined to blog about it. To be sure, earthquakes in Delaware,
Maryland, or Pennsylvania are not a very common phenomenon. One does not
think of that region as being earthquake prone; if one asks "What
regions of the USA are most associated with earthquakes?" one won't get
"Baltimore" or "Trenton" or "Philadelphia" as the answer. Los Angeles,
San Franciso, or even Portland or Seattle, yes; Baltimore, Trenton,
Philadelphia, no.
If one thinks about it, however, there has been
an increase in earthquake activity in regions of the country not
normally associated with it, and even in regions where earthquakes are
known - the lower plains states for example - this activity has been
written off to the increased oil fracking. As a be-all and end-all
model, however, the fracking explanation wouldn't seem to hold for
Delaware!
Then, Mr. V.T. sent along this article, and things just became much more interesting:
Slowing rotation in the Earth caught my eye, as one might imagine! According to this Forbes article, this slowing rotation is part of a cycle:
Geophysicists are able to measure the rotational speed of Earth extremely precisely, calculating slight variations on the order of milliseconds. Now, scientists believe a slowdown of the Earth's rotation is the link to an observed cyclical increase in earthquakes.To start, the research team of geologists analyzed every earthquake to occur since 1900 at a magnitude above 7.0. They were looking for trends in the occurrence of large earthquakes. What they found is that roughly every 32 years there was an uptick in the number of significant earthquakes worldwide.The team was puzzled as to the root cause of this cyclicity in earthquake rate. They compared it with a number of global historical datasets and found only one that showed a strong correlation with the uptick in earthquakes. That correlation was to the slowing down of Earth's rotation. Specifically, the team noted that around every 25-30 years Earth's rotation began to slow down and that slowdown happened just before the uptick in earthquakes. The slowing rotation historically has lasted for 5 years, with the last year triggering an increase in earthquakes.
"OK...
that seems sound," I thought. After all, every physical system one can
think of has either a wave-form or a rotation as one of its components.
And cycles of speeding up and slowing down rotation combines features of
both, for a cycle is nothing but a wave form.
However, at this juncture, three important questions occur, and you've probably already thought of them: (1) is the amplitude of this rotational cycle itself declining over time, that is, is the Earth's rotation really
gradually slowing down? and (2) in either case, what accounts for this
slowing down-speeding up cycle, whether or not the amplitude is
declining over time? and finally (3) what role, if any, might phase play in all of this?
Needless to say, the Forbes
article asks these questions, or rather, conflates these questions into
one, and gives a typically closed-system and, quite frankly, fumbling
sort of answer:
What Is Causing Earth's Rotation To Slow Down?As with many new findings in science, this story began with the data that supports the cyclical slowdown then speed up of Earth's rotation. The research team is then tasked with the "why" to explain this phenomenon. While scientists aren't exactly sure the mechanisms that produce this variation, there are a few hypotheses.One hypothesis involves Earth's outer core, a liquid metal layer of the planet that circulates underneath the solid lower mantle. The thought is that the outer core can at times "stick" to the mantle, causing a disruption in its flow. This would alter Earth's magnetic field and produce a temporary hiccup in Earth's rotation.Currently, the data only notes a striking correlation, but no causation.
Molten
stuff "sticking" to the mantle and thus slowing down the rotation of
molten metal that creates the Earth's magnetic field? Note that while
this sounds like an explanation, it really isn't. "Sticking" implies
"cooling", and "cooling" implies slowed motion. So we're simply thrown
back on the fundamental question by a carefully-disguised bit of
circular reasoning: what is causing this rotational slowdown to begin
with? And why would it appear in historically correlated cycles (wave
forms) of about 32 years? What other waves have a phase of 32 years?
Well, for one thing, a 32 year phase is about three times the 11 year
phase of the sunspot cycle. And that, I suspect, is a clue: the cycle
one is looking at might be correlated to several other cycles
of a fundamentally electromagnetic nature. Is there a relationship? If
so, then it would show up as "modulated information" in that 32-year
rotational cycle. And if it does, that's another indicator of the
interrelated dynamics of open systems.
Which
leads to the high octane speculation and the real question. When Mr.
V.T. and others began sending this "slowdown" story to me, some people
asked whether this meant an overall slowdown over time, and a fewer
still asked if this "slowdown" was accelerating suddenly in the last few
years. Certainly some versions of the story made it sound that way
though there wasn't much in the various articles that I saw by way of
any data, and that gave me pause. And perhaps, I thought, if there was
such data, it may be being suppressed.
After
all, what could cause some of that molten magma - whirling around
beneath us in that gigantic electro-dynamo that is the rotation of
planet Earth - to "slow down" and "stick" to the mantle? I had to throw
out the "sticking-cooling-slowing" model implied by the Forbes article,
and get back to basics: for that electrically dynamic magna to "stick"
to the mantle means that the "sticking" isn't a general phenomenon but a
localized one that has generalized effects.
So
what could cause it to "stick" and thus slow down, and in slowing down,
to cause a weakening in the magnetic field that it both produces and
which, to some extent, contains it? If the sticking is localized, then
it requires - here it comes - a very strong localized magnetic field
somewhere above that rotating magma, either in the mantle...
...or on the crust.
Something
like the hadron collider, with its big magnetic fields. And if that's
the case, it might be changing the phase of that 32 cycle of rotational
slowdowns, a cycle that might be correlated and couple to that sunspot
cycle.
And of course, when one plays
with rotations and cycles, one is playing with the very things that
denote systems state changes, or time... and if one wants to
play with time, it's best to do so - if one wants to observe results in
the macrocosm - with a large open system...
Kardashev
scale. "Farrell corollaries: the ability to engineer systems of a
certain scale precedes the need for energy on that very same scale."
Rotational cycles... rolling up the heavens like a curtain...
Class one: planets.
Class two: stars... https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/12/earthquakes-rotation-high-octane-speculation/






Enter
researcher Miles Mathis, to take the whole field of “conspiracy”
research to a new level, exposing even most alternative theories as
misdirection, and outing seemingly every mainstream cultural icon as an
agent, accomplice or dupe of the Intelligence services, at the behest of
the ruling elite. Mathis’ most radical vision is that even most
alternative “conspiracy” theories (including those of McGowan) play into
the larger deception or are a form of controlled opposition, hiding the
bigger picture of events from public scrutiny, and reinforcing the
illusion that controversial personalities, assassinations, and terror
events were real at all.
I
emerge from my binge reading of Mathis—artist, physics bad boy,
cultural critic, and constant exposer of spooks—with every surety of my
youth dispelled by his X-ray vision. Using extensive genealogy from
mainstream sources, expert deconstruction of faked news photos, and
persuasive logic bolstered by straight-up honesty of method and intent,
with a charming way of presenting strong opinions as nothing other than
personal speculation, Mathis has caused the
We already know from official testimony that the CIA has controlled major media such as the New York Times, Washington Post, and Los Angeles Times. From Mathis we see that also such supposedly independent outlets such as Salon, the Paris Review, and the Atlantic are similarly compromised.
I
confess to a certain generational bias here, for like Mathis (in his
fifties), I am most disturbed by having the idols of my youth, and the
truths I took to be self-evident facts of a delivered history in the
making, turned into so much puppet theatre. Meanwhile, our personal
angst of disillusionment aside, that manufactured history has marched
on. The traditional battle lines between rich and poor, left and right,
have been redrawn as neoliberals and neoconservatives have joined forces
in launching the New World Order, leaving us peons outside the golden
gates of the industrial/financial elite.
In
this context the hidden agenda of the sixties documented by Mathis (and
admitted by the CIA, in the form of their program MK-ULTRA, among
others) makes sense: the promotion of a hedonistic culture of sex, drugs
and rock ‘n roll. At the time, we who lived through that
“revolutionary” era felt it as a genuine alternative to the previously
promoted culture of the fifties, which celebrated the pursuit of
happiness with makeup, a new car, and better living through chemistry,
along with those same perennial addictions—sex appeal; booze, pills and
cigarettes; the birth of rock ‘n roll.
In
the music culture since the early days of the century the jazz edge of
music was allied with pot smoking. With CIA plants like Huxley and Leary
pushing the psychedelics, that cultural wave was amped up and turned in
the opposite direction of the concurrent wave of political protest. The
progressive movement of the thirties had already got railroaded out of
the picture by World War Two, but it became more threatening in the
Civil Rights and Disarmament/Antiwar movements of the sixties and
beyond. So, following Mathis’s logic, even those movements were coopted
or turned or touted to fail, or deemed useful in demonizing those very
advocates—militant Blacks, airy peaceniks, dirty hippies—thus creating
false enemies within the society: the Left vs. the Right, liberals vs.
conservatives, straight vs. stoned. Both the putative state—the visible,
pre-elected government—and its decadent dissidents (or in popular
terms, the “Silent Majority” and the “Radical Fringe”) were set to
arguing on the playground, while the real business of Global
Corporatocracy proceeded apace.
What
has happened in politics has happened in art, and by design, says
Mathis. I admit this grudgingly because like everyone else I was
brainwashed to hold in high esteem every icon of the mass education and
entertainment industry, even those painted or pumped as rebels (my
personal demigod Jimi Hendrix included, according to other researchers).
Mathis gives a pass to Thoreau, and few other iconoclasts, but most of
the rest of our cultural heroes prove, by instructive genealogy and
demonstrably faked bios, darlings if not blood relatives of the
Intelligence and Military wings of the Deep State
When
I digest such truths, it’s hard for me to believe anymore in my former
indulgence with stream of consciousness writing or formless music. Now
that I’m hooked back into content by Mathis and his ilk, I see
the virtue of realism and formalism in art with new respect. The
critique carries even into New Age spirituality, played so often to the
classic Timothy Leary mantra, “Turn on, tune in, drop out”—negating
engagement with the nasty real world of the ongoing despoliation of our
fragile planet.