Friday, April 29, 2016

Selling ourselves for attention shit ?

fit US 2 a t ....Huh


Mother of transgender student urges SC school district to update bathroom policy

Because her child is a special snowflake or something like that…   ~hehe EVER notice because"they" don't know WTF "they"  ...R ???'s "our" fault Oops  &  it's "US"  who have 2 adjust 2 "them"  ya know WTF ..go selll fucking crazy some~where ELSE u's goffy kooky scatter brain compass offff fucking course fuck~ed UP    fucks  ( LOL but hey ! IF it geet's me in the "Lady's"   room wit out  geet~in  'arrested'  .... WTF  OK ) :o
Special snowflake
Via Fox News: The mother of a transgender student urged a South Carolina school district Tuesday to update its bathroom policy after her child was suspended for using the boys’ bathroom.
The mother, identified by WMBF-TV as Lynne, said her transgender son has been using the boys’ room at Socastee High School for just over three years until October when he was ordered to use the girls’ restroom or go to the nurse’s office.
Lynne pulled her son, identified as “R,” out of the school and enrolled him in online school. “R” won’t get to walk on stage at the end of his senior year to get his diploma. “That’s a huge thing for teenagers to take that walk and he’s not going to get to do that,” Lynne told WMBF-TV.
She said her son felt uncomfortable with using the girls’ room or the nurse’s room and was suspended in January for using the boys’ bathroom.
“Just let them use the bathroom and don’t bother them,” Lynne told the station. “Don’t harass them. Don’t single them out. Just let them do what they do every day so they can focus on what they’re in school for, which is to learn.”
The woman said she was worried about other transgender students in the school district and she wants to see the district pass a policy where students can use the bathroom of the gender they identify with.
The Transgender Law Center sent a letter to Horry County Schools Thursday, warning that the district would face a lawsuit if students were barred from using the restroom of the gender students identify with. The center said transgender students don’t need special accommodations – they need to be treated like all other students.
Horry County School Board Chaiman Joe DeFeo told WMBF-TV the district has handled all transgender cases appropriately. “The truth of the matter is there’s been very little conflict with it over the years,” DeFeo said. “We do have transgender students and I don’t see it as a major problem. But somebody else might.”
The Transgender Law Center said it will file a complaint Wednesday if it doesn’t receive confirmation that the school allows transgender students to use the bathroom of the gender they identify with. They could file a complaint with the Department of Education under Title IX.
“The District maintains the privacy of all of its students. The District seeks to accommodate the individual needs of its transgender students in compliance with the law, including Title IX,” the school district said in a statement. “We will continue our efforts to ensure a welcoming school environment for all students.”

Sandy Hook: The curious case of Adam Lanza’s ex-con funeral director

Adam Lanza
Adam Lanza
Adam Lanza was the 20-year-old alleged mass murderer of Sandy Hook who, on December 14, 2012, first killed his mother, Nancy, with four shots to her face in their family home, then drove a short distance to Sandy Hook Elementary School. There, in the space of 11 minutes, he shot to death 20 first-graders and 6 adults, before killing himself with a shot to the lower back of his head.
Among the many curiosities about Lanza, such as not leaving any online footprints despite being a computer wiz, is the fact that genealogy websites, e.g.,, initially had Lanza’s date of death, according to the Social Security Death Index, as a day before the massacre, on December 13, 2012. It was only after the curious date had been discovered by bloggers, did the websites revise it to the day of the massacre. (See “SSDI changed Adam Lanza’s date-of-death from Dec. 13 to Dec. 14, 2012 !!!” and “Sandy Hook: Adam Lanza’s strange Dec. 13 date-of-death just won’t go away”)
This post is about another Adam Lanza oddity: The funeral home and director who cremated his body.

Adam Lanza’s Death Certificate

On Dec. 23, 2012, the UK’s Mirror reported that Lanza was to be cremated in secret “to stop hater mobs targeting his remains”. On Dec. 31, 2012, ABCNews reported that Lanza’s “body” (presumably his ashes) had been claimed by his father, Peter, whose divorce from Nancy was finalized in 2010, and that the funeral home wanted to remain anonymous.
It turns out there is good reason for the funeral home to “remain anonymous”.
The alleged death certificate for Adam Lanza, published by the Sandy Hook skeptics-bashing, identifies two businesses that were involved in Lanza’s funeral arrangements:
  1. Linwood Crematory as the business in charge of “Disposition” of Lanza’s body (see Box #29 of death certificate).
  2. Hartford Trade Service as the “Funeral Facility” (Box #33), next to which is an illegible scribble as the “Signature of Funeral Director” (Box #34), whose license number is 2698 (Box #35).
⇓ Click image to enlarge ⇓
Adam Lanza death certificate
Linwood Cemetery and Crematory is at 41 John Ward Ave., Haverhill, MA 01830. Why Linwood was chosen is a mystery because it is located in Massachusetts — not Newtown, Connecticut, where Lanza killed himself; nor Stamford, Connecticut, where Peter Lanza resides; nor Kingston, New Hampshire, where Nancy Lanza was buried. (See Daily Mail)
To add to the confusion, a blogger has “A Statement of Death” for Adam Lanza by a funeral director at an entirely different funeral homeBrookside Chapel and Funeral Home in Plaistow, New Hampshire. (See my post, “Sandy Hook: Adam Lanza’s strange Dec. 13 date-of-death just won’t go away”.) Stranger still, that “Statement of Death” initially also had Lanza’s date of death as 12/13/2012 – a day before the alleged massacre. Nine days later, on 1/24/2013, Brookside made an amended “Statement of Death” with Lanza’s date of death changed to 12/14/2012. 

Hartford Trade Service & the ex-con funeral director kevin riley

That leaves Hartford Trade Service as the “Funeral Facility” for Adam Lanza’s body, and its funeral director who had signed Lanza’s death certificate with an illegible scribble, and whose license number is 2698.
Hartford Trade Service
We did an Internet search for Hartford Trade Service and found several news reports on HTS’s crooked funeral director Kevin Riley.
Kevin Riley, director of Hartford Trade Service
Kevin Riley, director of Hartford Trade Service
According to Hartford Courant, on January 25, 2011, Kevin Riley, 54, funeral director and owner of Hartford Trade Service, was sentenced to eight months in prison for using “a body-removal contract with the state medical examiner’s office to gain access to the estates of people who had died and stole assets from some of them,” and for double-billing state agencies for body removal. 
Prosecutors said Riley had himself appointed administrator of the estates of people with no relatives, giving him access to money and property with little or no scrutiny. Riley and his co-conspirator, Yolande Faulkner, who also was charged with larceny, would then steal money, jewelry and paintings and sell some of them through an auction house where Faulkner also was the bookkeeper. All told, Riley, through Hartford Trade Service, billed the Department of Social Services and the Office of the Chief State Medical Examiner more than $25,000. In many of those cases, Riley also charged the state $1,800 in burial fees — while also charging the person’s estate that same amount.
Riley surrendered his funeral director and embalming licenses to the state Department of Public Health and agreed to repay the estates he stole from as well as two state agencies that he had double-billed. Additionally, he must perform 50 hours of community service during each of 3 years of probation once he is released from prison.
Below are the State of Connecticut Department of Public Health‘s notification of Riley’s voluntary surrender of his license, and the discipline citations against him and Hartford Trade Service:
State of Connecticut Dept of Public Health citation against Kevin RileyState of Connecticut discipline citation against HTS and Kevin Riley

The Phonecall

We looked up Hartford Trade Service (HTS) on and found its address and phone number:
Hartford Trade Service: 623 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108, (860) 282-4500
We called that number, and had an interesting and cordial conversation with HTS’s owner, Kevin.
After 4-5 rings, a man answered. We asked if Hartford Trade Service is a funeral home. He paused, then answered hesitantly, “Yes,” and explained that HTS is a “non-traditional” funeral service because it:
  • Only does cremation; and
  • Does not deal with the public but works “behind the scenes” as a subcontractor to (regular) funeral homes.
He said HTS does not have a website and that his name is “Kevin.” He said HTS is still in business, despite some accounts that it had closed in 2011. Kevin also confirmed that some employee at HTS was in legal trouble a few years ago. He said he’s been HTS’s owner since 2010.
From the phone conversation, in all likelihood “Kevin” is Kevin Riley, funeral director of Hartford Trade Service, who in 2011 was convicted and sentenced to 8-months in prison for overbilling the State of Connecticut (for which HTS must have served as a subcontractor); and for stealing from the homes of deceased, then selling the stolen goods to antiques dealers.

Hartford Trade Service on Google Map

Zillow says Hartford Trade Service’s address, 623 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108, is a single-family home (lot 5.6 acres), last sold in Jan. 2011 for $280,000. has HTS as “Open Now”, M-F 8am-5pm.
But when we searched for 623 Main St., East Hartford, CT on Google Map, the building is identified as River Bend Funeral Home Crematorium! Below is a screenshot from Google Map:
623 Main St., East Hartford, CT
Indeed, Funeral Home Resource and both say River Bend Funeral Home & Crematory is at 623 Main St., (860) 282-4500 — the same address and phone number as Hartford Trade Service’s.

The Visit: Who’s Kevin Davidson?

An in-person visit to 623 Main St. confirms that the building carries only a sign that says “River Bend Funeral Home”. No where is there any indication that the building also houses Hartford Trade Service.
Kevin wasn’t there, but a male assistant “Joe” was, who  said that River Bend Funeral Home’s owner is Kevin Davidson (not Kevin Riley)Here’s Kevin Davidson’s business card, identifying him as the owner of Hartford Trade Service:
Kevin's Business Card copy
The only problem is this: The website ConnecticutCorps: Company Profiles of Connecticut, has Kevin Riley as the owner of River Bend Funeral Home, 623 Main St., East Hartford, CT 06108 — which means the assistant lied. More disturbing still is what ConnecticutCorps says about River Bend’s “Company Overview”:
RIVER BEND FUNERAL HOME AND CREMATORIUM, LLC is a Domestic Limited Liability Company in Connecticut and its company number is 0901394. RIVER BEND FUNERAL HOME AND CREMATORIUM, LLC was registered on May 29, 2007. The company’s status is listed as Dissolved.
As proof, here’s a screenshot of ConnecticutCorps page on River Bend, with the time and date (4/27/2016) when the screenshot was taken:
 ⇓ Click image to enlarge ⇓
ConnecticutCorps on River Bend Funeral Home

The Search for Licenses

We then went on the State of Connecticut’s eLicensing website to search for the licenses of Hartford Trade Service, funeral director Kevin Riley, River Bend Funeral Home & Crematory, and funeral director Kevin Davidson. Alas, we came up empty-handed on all four:
  • We searched for Hartford Trade Service and got this: license expired 1/5/2011.
  • We searched for River Bend Funeral Home and got this: license expired 1/4/2011.
  • We searched for Kevin Riley, funeral director of HTS, and got this: No records found for the criteria entered.
  • We searched for Kevin Riley, funeral director of River Bend Funeral Home, and got this: No records found.
  • We searched for Kevin Davidson of River Bend Funeral Home, and got this: No records found.
Below are screenshots of the search results:
Hartford Trade Service inactive license1Kevin Riley on elicense.ct.govRiver Bend Funeral Home inactive license1
eLicensing search result for Riven Bend Kevin RileyeLicensing search result for River Bend Kevin Davidson
That the State of Connecticut’s eLicensing has no records for funeral home Hartford Trade Service is also confirmed by an anonymous tipster to Professor James Fetzer. In an email, the tipster wrote:
Hartford Trade Service’s business expired 1.5.2011! This is very big as Hartford Trade Service not in business when Sandy Hook occurred! Closed for almost 2 years!
Hartford Trade Service
License type: funeral home
Licence no: 467
Expiration date: 1/05/2011 Granted date: 6/1/1989 License status: Inactive


To summarize, our investigations — online, by phone, in person — found that:
  • The funeral home for Adam Lanza was Hartford Trade Service, which has an expired license, but its owner said on the phone it is in business.
  • Though in business, the building that houses Hartford Trade Service does not identify itself as HTS, but as River Bend Funeral Home & Crematorium instead.
  • The funeral director of Hartford Trade Service, Kevin Riley, is a convicted felon, whom an employee claims to be Kevin Davidson.
  • But a website on company profiles in Connecticut identifies Kevin Riley, not Kevin Davidson, as the owner of River Bend Funeral Home.
  • The State of Connecticut eLicensing website has no records for funeral homes Hartford Trade Service or River Bend Funeral Home, or for funeral directors Kevin Riley or Kevin Davidson.
However, if the Sandy Hook massacre never took place, and Adam Lanza never died (or, as some say, never even existed), then an unlicensed funeral home with an unlicensed funeral director who’s an ex-convict would be the perfect candidate to pose as the “funeral facility” for a non-existent corpse.
~Eowyn and Cinderella’s Broom
For the links to all the posts Fellowship of the Minds has published on the Sandy Hook hoax, see our “Sandy Hook Massacre” page.
For a free copy of the book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook,  click here. To buy a hard copy of the book, sure to be a collector’s item, click here.

Update (April 29, 2016):

A reader, Kelley, of Prof. James Tracy’s Memory Hole Blog called River Bend Funeral Home and spoke to a man who identified himself as Kevin Davidson, the owner of River Bend. He denied that Kevin Riley and Kevin Davidson are the same person, and when Kelley read this post to him, he called my post “shoddy reporting”.
Alas, as I stated in my post, the website ConnecticutCorps: Company Profiles of Connecticut, has Kevin Riley as the owner of River Bend Funeral Home, and that the status of River Bend is “dissolved”. In other words, “Kevin Davidson” lied to Kelley.
Someone should really ask the State of Connecticut why:
  • River Bend, a “dissolved” funeral home whose license, according to the State of Connecticut’s own eLicensing website says has expired, is still in business.
  • Hartford Trade Service, also with an expired license, somehow managed to be the “funeral facility” for Adam Lanza’s corpse.


If you've been following the whole GMO-glyphosphate issue, you'll be readily aware that the whole scientific method and process has been corrupted by the GMO corporations - a global network of big agribusiness mercantilists that we not-so-lovingly refer to on this website as "I.G. Farbensanto", or Mon(ster)santo, or DuPontzanto, Syncrudda, and a variety of other accurate names to denote both the quality of their products, and the caliber of their morals and business ethics. To be blunt, and as most readers of this and other websites that are devoted to the subject of GMOs, the corporate-sponsored "science" proving the safety of their own products (big surprise, huh?) has been challenged by a number of independent scientists conducting their own studies (most especially in France, where these studies were legally challenged and vindicated).  Well, there may have been another setback for I.G. Farbensanto in, of all places, Brussels, the center of that bureaucratic-technocratic nightmare misnamed the European "Union", according to this article shared by Ms. M.W., and written by F. William Engdahl, one of our favorite researchers and commentators on the subject:
Dramatic Turn in Brussels Glyphosate Battle
First, you'll note the reference to those bothersome French studies that IG Farbensanto tried to kill (indeed, we wonder why it didn't simply assassinate Dr. Seralini, who conducted them):
The true secret of the toxic danger of GMO crops in the animal and human food chain is gradually coming to light. It is becoming clearer that perhaps as much or even more a toxic danger for human and animal consumption of GMO corn, soy products and other GMO varieties, are the chemicals the GMO seeds are by contract agreement necessarily mated with. No farmer anywhere in the world is allowed to buy Monsanto GMO “Roundup Ready” seeds without at the same time signing a binding contract to annually buy and use Monsanto glyphosate-based Roundup weed killer. In fact, the only trait that Monsanto Roundup Ready corn or soybeans are genetically modified for is to resist the toxic killing effect of Roundup while every living biological matter around not “glyphosate resistant” is killed.
Until a recent study by the courageous group of scientists under Professor Giles-Eric Seralini at France’s Caen University, few independent scientific long-term rat studies of Roundup or glyphosate were done. Monsanto and other GMO companies refused to disclose the adjuvant chemicals paired with Roundup or other herbicides claiming “business secrets.”
Since the WHO’s March 2015 IARC determination that glyphosate, alone and in combination with adjuvant toxic chemicals was a probable human carcinogen, the dam of secrecy around glyphosate has burst. To parody the line of then Presidential candidate Bill Clinton in a debate with opponent George H.W. Bush in the 1992 election race, “It’s the glyphosate, stupid!”
The problem now facing the Brussels bureaucrats is that growing opposition, which has now reached proportions that even a dumbed-down European commissioner can understand the implications:
As we described in a previous writing, the EU Commission had recommended approval of another 15-year license for the controversial glyphosate based on the suspicious determination by the EU’s corrupt EFSA that there was no reason to believe glyphosate is a carcinogen. That determination, not backed up by open disclosure of the relevant health and safety studies EFSA claimed to rely on, went totally against the 2015 determination by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) that glyphosate, the weed-killer used in most every GMO plant worldwide and most other crops and even home gardens as well, was a “probable carcinogen.”
EFSA, basing its view on a report by Germany’s Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), which in turn was given it by Monsanto and other agrochemical industry groups, said it is unlikely to pose a cancer risk. IARC used only data that was in the public domain, but the corrupt German BfR based its report on secret industry studies that it refused to release to IARC or to the public.
Currently the Monsanto and other agribusiness industry studies submitted to support regulatory authorizations of pesticides are kept secret under commercial confidentiality agreements with regulators. Now Andriukaitis, clearly feeling the pressure, has said that this needs to change. He stated, “We are ready to assess the legal environment,” as there are certain legal protections on industry data. But, he added, “It’s absolutely crystal clear, we need to change today’s situation. We see different options, but at the moment, yes, the idea is to change the rules, especially keeping in mind the overriding public interest.”
You'll note the typical bureaucratese being spoken here: "change the situation" and "different options" and "change the rules".  These are not the words of an individual enthusiastic about doing the right thing, but of someone, as Mr. Engdahl points out, under pressure from independent scientists and over a million and a half petitioners.
The problem, however, is that the modern "state" in the West is largely just for show; the peoples of the west are largely - and deliberately - disenfranchised from any real political influence by a variety of mechanisms, mostly leading back to large corporations and their mercentilist policies of obtaining special privileges and status from their respective governments. Consider, for example, the implications of the following quotations from Mr. Engdahl's article:
Under the right of access to documents in the EU treaties, as enshrined in Regulation 1049/2001 and in the Aarhus Regulation, I am requesting documents which contain the following information:
There is an alarming scientific controversy between the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer of the World Health Organization (IARC) with regard to the carcinogenicity of glyphosate. In March 2015, IARC concluded that glyphosate is a probable human carcinogen (category 2A) . However, later that same year, in November 2015, EFSA concluded that glyphosate is “unlikely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans and the evidence does not support classification with regard to its carcinogenic potential.”
Proper classification of glyphosate is crucial because it potentially affects public health and entails important regulatory consequences. It is therefore vital to investigate why there are contradictory results in the EFSA and IARC assessments. To date EFSA has explained that its “evaluation considered a large body of evidence, including a number of studies not assessed by the IARC which is one of the reasons for reaching different conclusions” (EFSA news story, 12 November 2015 –…). This means that the EFSA peer review is based on unpublished studies whose findings cannot yet be verified and subjected to independent scrutiny.
You'll notice that besides the reference to the lack of real and genuine independent scientific verification of the safety claims for GMOs and glyphosphate, that the whole quotation refers, not once, to any law or legislation, but to "treatises" and "regulations," and that, is, indeed, the central problem of the modern west, and the GMO issue has highlighted it for all to see: the people have no real voice, and the regulators and bureaucrats, whose presumptive duty is to guard the safety and health of the general public, are doing, and have done, anything but, since the institutions of government they ostensibly fill have been bought and paid for by the corporations they supposedly regulate! The result has been what Mr. Putin has pointed out: western governments are now forcing their populations in some places to get vaccines, for which there is a growing and disturbing body of evidence that some ingredients are linked to autism, while GMOs have ruined the soil, endangered the health of their populations, and while the corporations seek by any and all means to continue to do so.
In short, I contend that the GMO issue has given us a taste of Mr. Global's vision for "the global community" and "global government" by banks, corporations, and technocrats.
And they have utterly and completely failed. One cannot have genuine science, genuine health, and most importantly, genuine government and a civil society without transparency, and freedom to question and challenge, and without an absolute equality of law; there cannot be one set of "rules" for the corporations and the Mr. Rockefailures who want to rule everything, and another set for everyone else.
The experiment of Mr. Global is a failure, and that failure is revelaed by the GMO issue. If there is to be a "global order," then a new vision is required, one in which corporations are not the arbiters of opinion, policy, regulation, and law.
Or to put it "Donald Trump simple": Mr. Rockefailure, you're fired.

The Guess Who - Shakin' All Over

The Guess Who - Shakin' All Over   ~ hehe what ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL the ...Lady's  dooooooooooo 2 us ...guys   :)r

Monday, April 25, 2016





When you become a researcher of the fringe and the person who searches in the darkest alleys for paranormal happenings, you find something sinister and very powerful is driving those around us into making decisions that really have no explanation.
It is always easy to develop fearful notions that a lot of what is happening behind the scenes is cleverly obscured and in some moments, the open conspiracy is obvious and that those who are the planners in control of the world are driven by the occult relationships with powers and principalities that defy explanation.
If we were to call it an alien intrusion of infiltration, there would be plenty of people that would ridicule and snicker at the prospect, but we cannot defy or even argue against the notion that what we are up against is a intergenerational, pathological governance by powerful individuals that certainly possess the “blood” rite and the ability to wield power at the expense of their fellow man.
We can argue that what we are seeing is an occult driven body of leadership who have an obligation to someone or something that can be seen as hauntingly identical to an alien synarchy.
Synarchism is a term which generally means “joint rule” or “harmonious rule.”
Beyond this general definition, both synarchism and synarchy have been used to denote different political processes in various contexts. Increasingly, the terms have been used to denote rule by a secret elite.
The Synarchy that may be in power now is part of an alien /human alliance run by an elite priesthood who some have claimed to be the Illuminati. Unfortunately the word Illuminati paints everything with a wide brush and so it is impossible to pinpoint just who may be responsible and who is pulling the strings.
If we wanted to be so bold as to identify an alien alliance with the rulers of the world we would not identify it as the Illuminati.
We would identify it by its ancient devotion to the God of Fortresses and the Cult of EL.
According the Biblical scholar, David Flynn, The God of Fortresses is a God from Mars. The war-like extra-terrestrial God. The Hebrew word for the God of Fortresses is Ala Mahozim. In Hebrew the root word for fortresses is mahoz (MARS) which means the “place of strength” or “stronghold”. According to biblical prophecy, the highly-feared Antichrist pays tribute to this “god” which is the Lord of the Sky and space, Baal.
Besides the already established connection with Baal, or his full name in this case, Baalhazor, “Lord of the Fortresses”, there is a curious parallel between this Ala Mahozim and the god Melkart, worshiped in the island kingdom of Tyre. This god was supposedly brought to the island by Astarte after he had fallen from the heavens. His name means, “King of the Fortresses.”
The ‘fallen one’ in the Christian pantheon is the Morning Star or Lucifer.
According to religious apocalyptic prophecy, the Antichrist figure will not only acknowledge the “aliens”, or the minions of the “alien god of fortresses”, but he will also control their activities. He will be their “emissary” and spokesman. He will grant them the ability to work in tandem with his new empire and divide up the areas of the earth so that they can have sanctuary and honor.
Another good King in the heavens that watch over the fortresses of the air was Saturn. His name anciently was known as EL.
The plural term, Elohim, appears over 2500 times in the Old Testament but is falsely translated in most versions. This fact of plurality explains why in Genesis ‘God’ said, ‘Let us make man in our image.’
As stated, Elohim refers to both ‘gods’ and ‘goddesses,’ and its singular form, EL, served as a prefix or suffix to names of gods, people and places, whence Emmanuel, Gabriel, Bethel.
It was EL, or Saturn who eventually was called, Satan.
It is believed that even ‘Satan’ was one of the Elohim.
The Saturni and the Nephilim were the “fallen ones” found in the Book of Genesis. Their mission was to create alien human hybrids that would work and live amongst us to create chaos.
It has been further maintained throughout ancient history that mankind’s myths, from the Bible to the Popul Vuh, were forged under the triple eye of Saturn, Venus and Mars, as viewed superimposed on one another from the Earth. It’s certainly true the Greeks and Romans identified Saturn (or Kronos) as an infanticidal monster, eating his children.
But the Lords of the air or the Fortresses, the Saturni and the Nephilim had minions that survived many of the catastrophic cycles because it was believed that they were engineered by them. The Saturni were allegedly the offspring of their forefathers coming in to the daughters of men as reported in Genesis, Chapter 6. These beings have been known to be the hoarders of earthly resources, territorial, mysterious and predatory.
They also seem to be very patient.
This “patience of the planners” aspect eventually becomes evident to any sincere researcher, and literally haunts and even taunts with its seductive treachery. It’s beyond us. And that’s the key – they’re not normal. Something very powerful and sinister is driving them.
It is evident that what they do and how they react is not human. In fact, their directives seem to be more alien, which makes for a compelling argument that aliens are among us, and they are directing the world leaders towards a more war-like footing because the agenda of these beings has always been the destruction of the common man and the raising the seed of what can be called, “The New Man of Heaven” or Homo Calaestis.
There are others that call the infiltration and incarnation of alien and human as Homo Illuminatus.
Fully developed conscious humans wouldn’t plot and scheme for generations to take over the world at any cost to its inhabitants. Most humans inherently trust and positively contribute in conscious, natural ways, endeavoring to pass on to their progeny loving wisdom and a better world.
In conspiracy circles, there are always dots that are connected leading to the great conspiracy of a dark order that has all of the secrets about just who is in charge of the planet. There are theories about ‘dark brotherhoods’ who receive their information by channeling the power of demons and there are other investigators that have shown for millennia, mankind has been directed by overlords that can only be compared to extra-terrestrials.
We are now at a point in time where we weigh impossibilities and inevitabilities. It seems to be a never-ending paradox. The world, at the moment, seems unreal as we now understand that uncertainty is a certainty and that change can cause great upheavals that can affect us for years or even lifetimes.
When H.G. Wells, a Fabian socialist, wrote his books he was revealing in the fictitious accounts what he saw for the future. Everything from wars fought between men, to speculating on the conquering of space to control the Earth from the air, and the final battle between extra-terrestrial beings setting out to colonize the Earth.
It is imperative to realize that Wells was very much part of the elite that knew of the structuring of the New World Order and how it would be accomplished. It would be done so using artillery and scientific marvels on land, sea and space.
He especially was forthcoming in his book “The New World Order” where all aspects of his fictions were seriously brought into reality in nonfiction where nothing was out of the question in bringing forth the totalitarian state, including the changing of religious belief in order to sustain beliefs in extra-terrestrials and a new form of collectivism or statism that will be used as way to create a new order for a new generation that will be ready to accept all things we see as outrageous and unbelievable.
Wells, in his book “The New World Order,” was quoted as saying “Countless people will hate the New World Order and will die protesting against it.” Wells said eventually, the Earth would be ruled by an oligarchy of enlightened elites that would be under the control of a shadow brotherhood who will carry out their affairs with an intercession between beings of an unknown origin.
These beings would be considered gods unknown from unknown realms, aliens who would utilize “minions” or disciples that have the bloodlines of the human-alien union which was created, anciently.
The Book of Daniel in the Bible gives us a glimpse of how the Antichrist will be a demonic hybrid of an alien and human union and that he will raise temples in honor of these lords of fortresses, the demons of the air like Baal.
“But in his place shall he honor the god of fortresses, Ala Mahozim, a god whom his fathers did not know; he shall honor it with gold and silver and precious stones and with things of great price.”
The famous arch from Palmyra, known as the Arch from the Temple of Baal, was finally recreated and erected in London. The replica was erected in defiance of ISIS as the original Temple of Baal was destroyed by the radicalized group.
The recreated Arch was renamed the Arch of Triumph because of protests provided by religious groups. Plans to erect a duplicate Temple Arch in New York were scrapped.
Coincidentally, the Arch was erected in front of the obelisk known as Cleopatra’s Needle.
Cleopatra’s Needle is the popular name of three Ancient Egyptian obelisks re-erected in London, Paris, and New York City during the nineteenth century. The obelisks in London and New York are a pair, and the one in Paris is also part of a pair originally from a different site in Luxor, where its twin remains.
Although all three needles are genuine Ancient Egyptian obelisks, their shared nickname is a misnomer, as they have no connection with Queen Cleopatra VII of Egypt, and were already over a thousand years old in her lifetime.
The London and New York “needles” were originally made during the reign of 18th Dynasty Thutmose III. The Paris “needle” dates to the reign of 19th Dynasty Ramesses II and was the first to be moved and re-erected. The New York “needle,” was the first to acquire the nickname, “L’aiguille de Cléopâtre” in French, where it stood in Alexandria.
The re-designing of the arches of Baal and alien God near the Obelisk, which is a phallic representation of the alien Egyptian God, Osirus. Coincidentally, Osirus married his sister Isis. In Egyptian mythology, Isis is considered Saturn’s eldest daughter:
“I am Isis, Queen of this country. I was instructed by Mercury. No one can destroy the laws which I have established. I am the eldest daughter of Saturn, most ancient of the Gods.”
The secret doctrines of Egypt, and the Secret schools allegedly were created to reveal the secrets that were given by alien gods to the Egyptians.
Ancient Hebrews represented Saturn with the six pointed star, which later became the Star of David, the hexagram also had many other esoteric meanings. The symbol is still found on Israel’s flag.
The advent of the monotheistic religions of Christianity, Judaism and Islam confined the worship of Saturn to occult circles. These occult circles and secret societies possess the knowledge about the affairs of man and their extra-terrestrial relationship.
Many of our founding fathers were part of those secret societies, like Freemasonry.
The signs and symbols of ancient and modern Freemasonry are rooted in Egypt and the evidence is overwhelmingly obvious that Freemasonry borrowed its allegorical myths and ideological metaphors from more ancient societies that were well advanced in the philosophical mysteries and secret doctrines of the entities from the air.
Many Christians in America believe that the establishment of the United States was based on Christian values and ideologies. This is only half true, because the rebellious nature of the insurrection was purely Luciferian, and in some cases bordering on Hermetic Arcanum, Kabala, Babylonian school dogma and Gnosticism.
From the very beginning of Christianity, the Gnostics, or those who called themselves of a “different opinion” than the Christians, began a systematic opposition to the Apostles, and adopted an “elitist view” against the general teaching of the Gospel.
They were of the opinion the dogmas of the Gospel were good for the common people, but the superior minds of the ruling oligarchy required a “secret doctrine” which was reserved for the elite.
This doctrine known as the forbidden doctrine was the doctrine provided by several known entities that allegedly existed during the time of Adam.
They were known as the Nachash an upright reptilian creature that did not speak but spoke to the mind or whispered to the mind secrets or knowledge of the Gods.
It is written in many biblical commentaries that the Nachash had the ability to possess the souls of man and force them into doing things against their will.
It is evident there has been an ongoing conspiracy of alien entities among us from the ancient texts to modern writers who have explored the ongoing controls of the patient alien planners.
From the first tales of men coming down from the heavens to UFO sightings, the underlying question is why are these beings here?
Encounters with Unidentified Flying Objects have been categorized into five groups as close encounters of the first, second, third, fourth and fifth kind.
When a person sees a UFO within 150 meters, it’s an encounter of the first kind. When an encounter with a UFO in the sky or on the ground leaves evidence behind such as scorch marks on the ground or indents, etc., it’s of the second kind. When an encounter is with visible occupants inside the UFO, it’s of the third kind. The fourth kind involves the person being taken and experimented on inside the alien craft. The fifth kind involves direct communication between aliens and humans.
Now there seems to be a CE-6 or Close encounter if the 6th kind: Infiltration and hybridization of both human and alien after an encounter.
Retired Temple professor David Jacobs, has been doing research on alien abductees and has also detailed the “Alien Agenda” in his book “The Threat.” Now he has researched and reported that it appears to be evident the alien human hybrids are now among us and that they are being supported by our leadership and world secret societies.
Jacobs has interviewed about 150 people who say they’ve been abducted by aliens, the forgotten details of their cosmic kidnappings resurfacing in relaxation sessions the self-taught hypnotist does in his home.
Citing public polls, he estimates that aliens have abducted more than a million Americans.
He readily admits that the evidence of extra-terrestrial life and body-snatching is “weak,” muddied by an abundance of blurry photos and phony or misinterpreted “memories.”
Yet, he insists evidence exists that now alien hybrids are among us and records from the ancients until now have a rich history of alien meddling on Earth.
His new book, Walking Among Us: The Alien Plan to Control Humanity, examines a disturbing phenomenon that Jacobs began noticing in 2003. The alien integration action plan has kicked into high gear. The incidents of alien abductions have declined as occurrences of alien involvement in everyday life have accelerated. A silent and insidious invasion has begun.
It is beginning to appear as if there is some sick cooperation between mankind and darker alien forces that create a cloud of death and chaos in order to control human beings on this planet.
With our egos in check, we must understand that while we believe we are well advanced and educated, the reality is pointing to the idea that the ancients before us had all kinds of relationships with beings that lived outside of the Earth and they often fought for their own safety as the beings from the skies often wanted women, children and blood offerings for sustenance.
It may be hard to believe but much of what has been covered up by religions and governments regarding our affairs with these entities are actually well-known by those who are members of so-called secret societies. We see these scenarios played out today just like they were anciently.
The core intelligence that accompanies aliens is they are actually harbingers of doomsday activity and when they are seen in greater numbers, we tend to see disaster later.
History and now researchers have indicated the creation of an alien-human hybrid has been one of the extra-terrestrial’s key projects here.
It appears they have been successful. We are now being aware of the possibility that hybrids walk among us. They look and sound and feel like us. The alien invasion’s intention is to have these hybrids become advisers to humans in positions of power.
It appears they have succeeded with that plan as well. This could be the reason why this planet seems to be nose-diving into a perilous spiral. It could explain the various claims of demonic possession and so-called reptilian encounters that have made the mainstream news.
If this infiltration is real, then we have to admit that our genetic sanctity is now at risk.
Living in isolation for so very long, your whole notion of yourself, your notion of Creation and the Divine, are very much associated with this one world alone. However, as we reach out to other worlds with our telescopes, space ships and nanoprobes, do we ever wonder if the aliens we seek have already reached out to us?
Perhaps we have already taken their hand and they are leading us to our own extinction.

Trying To Find Time Travelers

A few days ago I was interviewed on a Canadian morning radio show about my research into so-called “cryptids.” We’re talking about the Chupacabra, lake-monsters, Mothman, and so on. During the course of the interview the host – in a very lighthearted fashion – asked me if I thought it was possible that what people are seeing might be animals extinct in our world today, but which are time-traveling back and forth from the periods when they were alive. Because that’s the kind of question daytime radio asks, right?
I told the host I’m actually quite open to the idea that at least some of our cryptids may originate in other realms, or dimensions, of existence. Which had him momentarily stuck for words, I’m pleased to say. But, I added, that’s very different to imagining Bigfoot has a Delorean-style time-machine to traverse countless millennia. Even I have limits on what’s feasible and what isn’t. Well, most of the time I do. Okay, some of the time. So, I said it was pretty unlikely. Even though, admittedly, I have to say I have heard a few stories broadly along those lines.
It was, however, the host’s words that led to an interesting question from one of the listeners, when the lines were opened up. She wanted to talk not about cryptids, but about that time travel issue. Not, as I was expecting or anticipating, from the perspective of whether it’s feasible. Rather, from the perspective of how we might actually go about finding time-travelers, if they really are among us.
Of course, to accept that time-travelers are with us – right here, on 21st century Earth – requires that we acknowledge time-travel is a reality. And by time-travel, I mean from the perspective of the caller, of me, and of most people: the ability to travel back and forth throughout the centuries and to witness world-changing, historic events. You know, sci-fi stuff: Back to the Future, The Philadelphia Experiment, 12 Monkeys.
Without solid proof of their reality, time-travel concepts remain things to ponder upon, to consider, and to be entertained by. But, let’s go back to that question put to me: if time-travelers are here, where are they and how do we find them? I have to concede that on more than a few occasions I have wondered if the Men in Black might be time-surfing entities, doing their best – but spectacularly failing – to blend in.
Let’s face it, their clothing – 1950s-era Mafia suits and your great-granddad’s fedora hats – is out of time. Their mode of transport – old-time Cadillac cars – is out of time, even though there is still a cool air about it. They have even asked witnesses, on more than a few occasions: “What time is it?” Maybe they’re actually asking what year they’re in. Or even what century. After all, constantly jumping back and forth has got to rattle a few brain cells, which may explain their often-reported clumsiness and odd actions. That or the beer is much stronger now than the stuff they serve in the 27th century. If so, thank God I’m a product of the 20th century.
Convertible Cruising
If time-travelers are here, right now, I would suggest that tracking down a Man in Black or several might be a good place to start. Granted, there are numerous theories for what the MIB might be, but that doesn’t mean we should avoid the more controversial angles.
I would also recommend that we take a long and deep look at all those supposed alien entities that people have met over the decades: the Greys, the Space-Brothers, and all the rest that hover hazily somewhere in between. The appearances may differ, but one thing unites so many of them: they are very often extremely keen to tell us they originate on some faraway planet in an equally faraway star-system.
That all strikes me as a bit suspicious, a bit too keen. It’s almost as if – from the very first moment of interaction – they want to ensure we believe they’re extraterrestrials. Maybe they’re being honest and that’s exactly what they are. On the other hand, ensuring we accept their ET origins would actually work very well for them if they are really…something else. Like us, from a future so distant it’s near-incomprehensible.
There’s another matter, too, when it comes to trying to find time travelers. When they’re in our time, they may well be forced to exist on the fringes of society and to tread very, very carefully. Mixing with people – other than when there is absolutely no choice – may be a definitive no-no. We’re talking about screwing up the time-lines. Killing your parents before you’re even born. Giving next weekend’s lottery numbers to a random stranger. Hooking me up with Angelina before she met Brad. Things like that.
The biggest problem we face when it comes to finding time travelers is that they most likely have very good reasons for not wanting to be found – ever. That’s if time travel is real, of course, and I’m not just rambling on and on…and on.

Sunday, April 24, 2016

Why Is The Federal Government Installing Mysterious Boxes On Utility Poles?   ~Oops

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives has claimed ownership of a mysterious box that was removed from a utility pole in Phoenix, Arizona.
Phoenix resident Brian Clegg was concerned about a box he witnessed being installed on a power pole. Clegg said the box was facing his house and he believed it may have had cameras inside. The pole was owned by Arizona’s largest power provider, SRP, who claimed no one had permission to put the box on their pole. Brian Clegg says shortly afterwards SRP sent a crew to remove the box.
Shortly after ABC15 investigated the matter, the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms and Explosives (ATF), a branch of the U.S. Department of Justice, acknowledged installing the box as part of an ongoing investigation. Officials with the ATF would not provide details about their alleged investigation and would not confirm if they were conducting surveillance in the area.
“I don’t feel safer,” said Brian Clegg. “I feel that my privacy has been violated.”
SRP told ABC15 they were unaware the box had been installed and that the ATF has to notify them if they are going install something on their property. The ATF told ABC15 they can put security measures in place without asking for permission. Obviously the federal government feels comfortable doing whatever it wants to do, whenever it wants to, law be damned.
One other interesting aspect of Clegg’s story is the fact that he claims the crew who installed the box came in a truck marked “Field Pros.” The thought of undercover government agents installing surveillance equipment while masquerading as utility workers is highly disturbing and sounds like a scene right out of a Hollywood film. Unfortunately, Phoenix is not the only city to have surveillance equipment installed by an agency of the federal government.

In November 2013, Seattle residents pushed back against the installation of several mesh network nodes attached to utility poles around the downtown area. The nodes were purchased by the Seattle Police Department via a $2.7 million grant from the Department of Homeland Security. The American Civil Liberties Union of Washington and privacy advocates were immediately concerned about the ability of the nodes to gather user information via the Wi-Fi connection.
“How accurately can it geo-locate and track the movements of your phone, laptop, or any other wireless device by its MAC address? Can the network send that information to a database, allowing the SPD to reconstruct who was where at any given time, on any given day, without a warrant? Can the network see you now?” asked Seattle newspaper The Stranger.
Initially the Seattle PD was reluctant to speak about the network. However, the police ultimately yielded to public opinion and decided, “the wireless mesh network will be deactivated until city council approves a draft policy and until there’s an opportunity for vigorous public debate.”
Although the situation in Seattle played out in favor of the people, we must recognize that there is a growing partnership between the surveillance agencies of the federal government and the increasingly militarized local police forces in the United States. As Activist Post previously reported, a new policy from the Obama administration will make it easier for the NSA to share information between law enforcement agencies with very little oversight.
According to the New York Times:
The Obama administration is on the verge of permitting the National Security Agency to share more of the private communications it intercepts with other American intelligence agencies without first applying any privacy protections to them, according to officials familiar with the deliberations.
The new rule changes would allow federal agencies such as the FBI to access streams of information gathered by the spy agency, “including emails, phone calls and location data.” These federal agencies would then have the ability to pass the data to state and local law enforcement. As theTimes points out, “all of this can happen without any congressional or judicial oversight under a Reagan era executive order known as EO 12333.”
The rule change by the Obama administration is only one of several tools that both local police and federal agencies have at their disposal. From drones to stingrays, gunshot detectors and automatic license plate readers – the State has an arsenal of spy equipment. How can the free hearts and minds of the world live free, happy, and abundant lives with the ever-present eyes and ears of Big Brother? We must educate ourselves about the tools used for surveillance and oppression and begin working to redirect the technology at the tyrants. We must persevere, be courageous, and shine a light on the darkness.
Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter and the founder of the Follow him on Twitter.
Derrick is available for interviews.
Courtesy of Activist Post

Massive food deception: Genetically engineered crops soon to be marketed as 'Non-GMO'Cibus

by Isabelle Z.
(NaturalNews) Food companies continue to find ways to deceive their customers – the food-buying public – as they aim to maximize their profits. In the latest example, one company has found a way to pass off genetically engineered crops as "non-GMO."
How can they get away with such deception? It all comes down to semantics. A San Diego company called Cibus is marketing a genome-edited, herbicide-resistant oilseed rape as non-genetically modified, on the grounds that only a few nucleotides in the existing genes of the plant were changed. They argue that because genes have not been inserted from other plants or other types of organisms, the classification is appropriate.

American regulators have allowed this to happen, designating the oilseed rape from Cibus as mutagenesis rather than genetic modification. This eliminates the need for the tremendous costs in time and money that the company would need to invest in order to get regulatory approval if it actually were to be labeled a GM organism. It can take more than five years and tens of millions of dollars to gain GM organism approval in the U.S.

The European Commission, meanwhile, has not yet taken an official stance on genome-edited crops, but a number of political groups in Europe are pushing for a hard line. Right now, an organism is usually considered to be GM in Europe if its genes have been changed in ways that could not have occurred naturally. By this definition, edited crops could fall under the GM classification.

Rothamsted Research scientist Huw Jones said: "If Europe regulates genome-edited organisms in the same way it does GM organisms, it will kill the technology here for all except the biotech companies working with profitable traits in the major crops."

Cibus uses a process known as RTDS

The gene-editing technology Cibus uses is known as Rapid Trait Development System (RTDS), which is a type of mutagenesis technology.

Cibus claims that RTDS is an "all natural" method that does not pose any of the environmental or health risks that are associated with transgenic breeding. Nevertheless, RTDS alters a genome in a way that simply wouldn't occur naturally in the course of breeding or genetic recombination. Studies are still needed to show the extent and frequency of any off-target effects that the process could have.

Genome editing enables scientists to quickly and precisely change or delete certain genes and bring in useful traits. Predictably, however, in the case of Cibus, it's all about the bottom line. While they could have made edits that make the plant's oil more nutritious, for example, they have instead opted for edits that enable farmers to spray more weedkiller over the crops.

Jones said: "I don't think it's too extreme to say that the way that the technology will be used for plant breeding in the future will hinge on how is regulated."

Another benefit of escaping the GM classification is avoiding the stigma that is rightfully attached to GM foods. Consumer backlash is growing, as the dangers of GM food are gaining publicity, and many areas are starting to institute labeling requirements so that consumers know which products to avoid.

Food deception is a common practice

This is far from the only example of companies using misleading practices when it comes to the content of their foods. Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, has written an entire book about the topic after testing a number of common foods, spices and supplements in his cutting-edge lab for the presence of heavy metals and other toxins. The book, Food Forensics, is a must-read for health-conscious consumers. In addition, the Food Revolution Summit provides information and research about food and pesticides.

We simply cannot trust what companies want us to believe about the contents of their food. Growing your own food is one way to know for sure what you are eating, and taking the time to research the foods you buy from independent sources can help give you that extra peace of mind that you're not ingesting any harmful substances.

Sources include: