Subscribe To
Posts
All Comments
Sunday, August 18, 2013
How Google Chrome Lets Anybody See Your Passwords
Google’s Chrome browser and operating system may be revealing your secret passwords to everyone from coworkers to absolute strangers.
One
of the most popular features of Chrome is its ability to store
passwords. That way they pop up automatically when you go to a function like email or Facebook. Elliot Kember, a software developer, discovered that anybody who clicks on the Chrome settings icon can see all of the passwords on that computer if he or she goes to the show advanced settings and passwords and forms sections.The passwords are obscured, but clicking next to them causes them to appear in plain text. The text can be easily copied and emailed or seen by anybody that uses the computer. That means it would be easy for a hacker or malicious stranger that opened a computer with Chrome on it to see all of your passwords.
What’s really disturbing is that the head of Chrome development at Google, Justin Schuh, told The Guardian that he knows all about the flaw. Worse, Schuh said that there are no plans to correct it. In a piece he wrote on the website ‘Hacker News’, Schuh explained:
“…we don’t want to provide users with a false sense of security, and encourage risky behavior. We want to be very clear that when you grant someone access to your OS user account, that they can get at everything.”One has to wonder why this flaw has not been fixed. It would certainly make a hacker’s job easier, let alone the job of the NSA or spy agency. If the source computer used Chrome, all the hacker would have to do is go to the settings icon to get the user’s email passwords. One security expert told The Guardian:
“The fact you can view the passwords means they are stored in reversible form which means that the dark coders out there will be writing a Trojan to steal that password store as we speak.”It has been revealed that large Internet companies such as Google and Microsoft have worked closely with the National Security Agency. There is even evidence that Skype (now part of Microsoft) helped the NSA get easy access to customer data. Therefore we need to ask, is this flaw actually helping these companies access your data even easier than before?
The surveillance state might be making it easier than ever for hackers to steal our personal information. The quest for national security appears to be endangering the security of the private individual.
» Humanity Is Drowning In Washington’s Criminality — Paul Craig Roberts
Humanity Is Drowning In Washington’s Criminality
Paul Craig Roberts
Americans will soon be locked into an unaccountable police state unless US Representatives and Senators find the courage to ask questions and to sanction the executive branch officials who break the law, violate the Constitution, withhold information from Congress, and give false information about their crimes against law, the Constitution, the American people and those in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Somalia, Guantanamo, and elsewhere. Congress needs to use the impeachment power that the Constitution provides and cease being subservient to the lawless executive branch. The US faces no threat that justifies the lawlessness and abuse of police powers that characterize the executive branch in the 21st century.
Impeachment is the most important power of Congress. Impeachment is what protects the citizens, the Constitution, and the other branches of government from abuse by the executive branch. If the power to remove abusive executive branch officials is not used, the power ceases to exist. An unused power is like a dead letter law. Its authority disappears. By acquiescing to executive branch lawlessness, Congress has allowed the executive branch to place itself above law and to escape accountability for its violations of law and the Constitution.
National Intelligence Director James R. Clapper blatantly lied to Congress and remains in office. Keith B. Alexander, Director of the National Security Agency, has also misled Congress, and he remains in office. Attorney General Holder avoids telling Congress the truth on just about every subject, and he also remains in office. The same can be said for President Obama, one of the great deceivers of our time, who is so adverse to truth that truth seldom finds its way out of his mouth.
If an American citizen lies to a federal investigator, even if not under oath, the citizen can be arrested, prosecuted, and sent to prison. Yet, these same federal personnel can lie to Congress and to citizens with impunity. Whatever the American political system is, it has nothing whatsoever to do with accountable government. In Amerika no one is accountable but citizens, who are accountable not only to law but also to unaccountable charges for which no evidence is required.
Congress has the power to impeach any presidential appointee as well as the president. In the 1970s Congress was going to impeach President Richard Nixon simply because he lied about when he learned of the Watergate burglary. To avoid impeachment, Nixon resigned. In the 1990s, the House impeached President Bill Clinton for lying about his sexual affair with a White House intern. The Senate failed to convict, no doubt as many had sexual affairs of their own and didn’t want to be held accountable themselves.
In the 1970s when I was on the Senate staff, corporate lobbyists would send attractive women to seduce Senators so that the interest groups could blackmail the Senators to do their bidding. Don’t be surprised if the NSA has adopted this corporate practice.
The improprieties of Nixon and Clinton were minor, indeed of little consequence, when compared to the crimes of George W. Bush and Obama, their vice presidents, and the bulk of their presidential appointees. Yet, impeachment is “off the table,” as Nancy Pelosi infamously declared. http://www.nytimes.com/cq/2006/11/08/cq_1916.html Why do Californian voters send a person to Congress who refuses to protect them from an unaccountable executive branch? Who does Nancy Pelosi serve? Certainly not the people of California. Most certainly not the US Constitution. Pelosi is in total violation of her oath of office. Will Californians re-elect her yet again? Little wonder America is failing.
The question demanding to be asked is: What is the purpose of the domestic surveillance of all Americans? This is surveillance out of all proportion to the alleged terrorist threat. The US Constitution is being ignored and domestic law violated. Why? Does the US government have an undeclared agenda for which the “terrorist threat” is a cover?
What is this agenda? Whose agenda is more important than the US Constitution and the accountability of government to law? No citizen is secure unless government is accountable to the Constitution and to law. It is an absurd idea that any American is more threatened by terrorism than by unaccountable government that can execute them, torture them, and throw them in prison for life without due process or any accountability whatsoever. Under Bush/Obama, the US has returned to the unaccountable power of caesars, czars, and autocrats.
In the famous play, “A Man For All Seasons,” Sir Thomas More, Chancellor of England, asks: So, you would have me to cut down the law in order to chase after devils? And what will we do, with the law cut down, when the devil turns on us?
This is the most important legal question ever asked, and it is seldom asked today, not in our law schools, not by our bar associations, and most certainly not by the Justice (sic) Department or US Attorneys.
American conservatives regard civil liberties as mere excuses for liberal judges to coddle criminals and terrorists. Never expect a conservative Republican, or more than two or three of them, to defend your civil liberty. Republicans simply do not believe in civil liberty. Democrats cannot conceive that Obama--the first black president in office, a member of an oppressed minority--would not defend civil liberty. This combination of disinterest and denial is why the US has become a police state.
Civil liberty has few friends in government, the political parties, law schools, bar associations, or the federal judiciary. Consequently, no citizen is secure. Recently, a housewife researched online for pressure cookers looking for the best deal. Her husband was searching for a backpack. The result was that a fully armed SWAT team appeared at the door demanding to search the premises and to have questions answered. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/08/government-knocking-doors-because-google-searches/67864/
I am always amazed when someone says: “I haven’t done anything wrong. I have nothing to fear.” If you have nothing to fear from the government, why did the Founding Fathers put the protections in the Constitution that Bush and Obama have stripped out? Unlike the Founding Fathers who designed our government to protect the citizens, the American sheeple trust the government to their own demise.
Glenn Greenwald recently explained how the mass of data that is being accumulated on every American is being mined for any signs of non-terrorist-related criminal behavior. As such warrantless searches are illegal evidence in a criminal trial, the authorities disguise the illegal way in which the evidence is obtained in order to secure conviction based on illegally obtained evidence. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article35773.htm
In other words, the use of the surveillance justified by the “war on terror” has already spread into prosecutions of ordinary criminals where it has corrupted legal safeguards and the integrity, if any, of the criminal court system, prosecutors and judges.
This is just one of the many ways in which you have much to fear, whether you think you are doing anything wrong or not. You can be framed for crimes based on inferences drawn from your Internet activity and jokes with friends on social media. Jurors made paranoid by the “terrorist threat” will convict you.
We should be very suspicious of the motive behind the universal spying on US citizens. The authorities are aware that the terrorist threat does not justify the unconstitutional and illegal spying. There have been hardly any real terrorist events in the US, which is why the FBI has to find clueless people around whom to organize an FBI orchestrated plot in order to keep the “terrorist threat” alive in the public’s mind. At last count, there have been 150 “sting operations” in which the FBI recruits people, who are out of touch with reality, to engage in a well-paid FBI designed plot. Once the dupes agree, they are arrested as terrorists and the plot revealed, always with the accompanying statement that the public was never in any danger as the FBI was in control.
When 99 percent of all terrorism is organized by the FBI, why do we need NSA spying on every communication of every American and people in the rest of the world?
Terrorism seldom comes from outside. The source almost always is the government in power. The Czarist secret police set off bombs in order to blame and arrest labor agitators. The Nazis burned down the Reichstag in order to decimate the communists and assume unaccountable power in the name of “public safety.” An alleged terrorist threat is a way of using fear to block popular objection to the exercise of arbitrary government power.
In order to be “safe from terrorists,” the US population, with few objections, has accepted the demise of their civil liberties, such as habeas corpus, which reaches back centuries to Magna Carta as a constraint on government power. How, then, are they safe from their government? Americans today are in the same position as the English prior to the Great Charter of 1215. Americans are no longer protected by law and the Constitution from government tyranny.
The reason the Founding Fathers wrote the Constitution was to make citizens safe from their government. If citizens allow the government to take away the Constitution, they might be safe from foreign terrorists, but they are no longer safe from their government.
Who do you think has more power over you, foreign terrorists or “your” government?
Washington defines all resistance to its imperialism and tyranny as “terrorism.” Thus, Americans who defend the environment, who defend wildlife, who defend civil liberties and human rights, who protest Washington’s wars and robbery of the people in behalf of special interests, all become “domestic extremists,” the term Homeland Security has substituted for “terrorist.” Those who are out of step with Washington and the powerful private interests that exploit us, other peoples, and the earth for their profits and power fall into the wrong side of Bush’s black and white division of the world: “you are for us or against us.”
In the United States independent thought is on the verge of being criminalized as are constitutionally guaranteed protests and the freedom of the press. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/aug/10/james-risen-prison-journalism-criminalised The constitutional principle of freedom of speech is being redefined as treason, as aiding an undefined enemy, and as seeking to overthrow the government by casting aspersions on its motives and revealing its secret misdeeds. The power-mad inhabitants of Washington have brought the US so close to Gestapo Germany and Stalinist Russia that it is no longer funny. Indeed, it is sometimes difficult to see the difference.
The neoconservatives have declared that Americans are the “exceptional” and “indispensable people.” Yet, the civil liberties of Americans have declined the more “exceptional” and “indispensable” that Americans become. We are now so exceptional and indispensable that we no longer have any rights.
And neither does the rest of the world. Neoconservatism has created a new dangerous American nationalism. Neoconservatives have given Washington a monopoly on right and endowed its military aggressions with a morality that supersedes the Geneva Conventions and human rights. Washington, justified by its “exceptionalism,” has the right to attack populations in countries with which Washington is not at war, such as Pakistan and Yemen. Washington is using the cover of its “exceptionalism” to murder people in many countries. http://news.antiwar.com/2013/08/11/us-drones-pound-yemen-but-targets-arent-all-militants/print/ Hitler tried to market the exceptionalism of the German people, but he lacked Washington’s Madison Avenue skills.
Washington is always morally right, whatever it does, and those who report its crimes are traitors who, stripped of their coddling by civil liberties, are locked away and abused until they confess to their crimes against the state. Anyone who tells the truth, such as Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, and Edward Snowden, are branded enemies of the state and are ruthlessly persecuted.
How does the “indispensable, exceptional nation” have a diplomatic policy? How can a neoconized State Department be based on anything except coercion? It can’t. That is why Washington produces nothing but war and threats of war.
Wherever a person looks, whatever a person hears, it is Washington’s threat--“we are going to bomb you into the stone age” if you don’t do what we want and agree to what we require. We are going to impose “sanctions,” Washington’s euphemism for embargoes, and starve your women and children to death, permit no medical supplies, ban you from the international payments system unless you relent and consent to being Washington’s puppet, and ban you from posting your news broadcasts on the Internet.
This is the face that Washington presents to the world: the hard, mean face of a tyrant.
Washington’s power will survive a bit longer, because there are still politicians in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, Latin America and in Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and the NGOs in Russia, who are paid off by the almighty dollar. In exchange for Washington’s money, they endorse Washington’s immorality and murderous destruction of law and life.
But the dollar is being destroyed by Quantitative Easing, and the domestic US economy is being destroyed by jobs offshoring. http://www.manufacturingnews.com/news/TAA0731131.html
Rome was powerful until the Germans ceased to believe it. Then the rotten edifice collapsed. Washington faces sooner or later the same fate. An inhumane, illegal, unconstitutional regime based on violence alone, devoid of all morality and all human compassion, is not acceptable to China, Russia, India, Iran, and Brazil, or to readers of this column.
The evil that is Washington cannot last forever. The criminals might destroy the world in nuclear war, but the lawlessness and lack of humanity in Washington, which murders more people as I write, is no longer acceptable to the rest of the world, not even to its European puppet states, despite the leaders being on Washington’s payroll.
Gorbachev is correct. The collapse of the Soviet Union was a debacle for the entire world. It transformed the US from the “city upon the hill,” the “beacon for humanity,” into an aggressive militarist state. Consequently, Amerika has become despised by everyone who has a moral conscience and a sense of justice.
A little different Fuku topic today
The most important document ever produced by this web site is here: Nuclear Sabotage at Fukushima
To read the Fukushima report in German, Click here and for the original click hereI cannot find the super high res photos of reactors 1 and 2, I found good ones, but not the ones I remember. So until I find them (they are on backup somewhere) instead of proving the carbon was blown out of the reactor cores, I am going to today document and prove that the scenarios at reactors 1,2,and 3 were flatly impossible absent Israel remote administering Fukushima via the Stuxnet virus, and playing games with the control room readouts to baffle the Fuku engineers long enough to get away with destroying Fukushima entirely. Tomorrow's topic will likely be the cleanup of the fuel pellets expelled from reactor 3, and proof it threw it's fuel everywhere, thus vaporizing the hydrogen blast lie the rest of the way. Then it will be on to other things Fuku related, but today, take a look at this: This diagram shows the placement of the safety release valves at each of the reactor sites. Though only one valve is shown in this diagram, they are in fact redundant. This is the valve that is shown right where the pipe comes out of the side of the reactor, near the top. Reactors 1 and 2 had 11 of these valves each, according to the reactor engineer I interviewed, and reactor 3 had a ridiculously high safety margin with 17 of these valves installed.
The reactors were designed to run at 1150 PSI, and the valves release at 1160 PSI unless they get a command from the controller to stay shut, and if told to stay shut they never open. Since these valves function automatically unless they are told not to, I'd like to ask how 39 of them simultaneously failed at Fukushima.
The valve in the diagram is the first one out of the top of the reactor and is labeled "safety relief valve". These are redundant, there is more than one
In addition to these valves failing to open, which would have vented all
the pressure from the reactors out the large smokestacks you see in all
the Fukushima pictures in a spectacular fashion unlike anything ever
seen in industry before, (27 gigawatts of energy coming out of two pipes
with the reactors over 3,000 PSI if they had opened at that pressure,
which would have been more than obvious in the Fuku videos) the facility
operators were continuously fed control room readouts which indicated
the reactor pressures were below the level that would cause the valves
to automatically open.Here is the smoking gun
The engineers knew the pumps were not running, and that no steam was being diverted from the reactors through the passive backup systems. Despite this, the pressure readings remained normal. But they knew the reactors needed water despite what the control room said, and sent people to inject water into the reactors via a special pipe that allowed external pumps to be hooked up from outside the containment structures, so like the generators that arrived on time but were refused by the virus to connect, auxiliary pumps also arrived on time to force water into the reactors even with everything in the facility disabled by the virus. With the pressure readings in the control room being normal, the people sent to pump water into the reactors soon discovered they could not, because contrary to what the control room was saying, the pressures in the reactors were above the 3,000 psi the external pumps could deliver. This proves sabotage all by itself, because if the mechanical safety release valves were supposed to let go at 1160 PSI and did not, all the while the control room was receiving normal pressure readings, something was seriously amiss.Upon receiving word that the pressures in the reactors were approximately 3 times the normal operating pressure of 1150 PSI, the engineers gave the command to force all 39 safety release valves to open manually, rather than automatically, and at all 3 reactor sites this command was ignored by the virus infected controllers, which did the opposite and kept them shut. So with both automatic and manual release enabled, NONE of the 39 safety valves opened, and reactors 1 and 2 exploded. This was clearly outlined in the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission report (which to this day claims that hydrogen gas caused the explosions) but I am going to shred even that now -
SINCE THE ONLY WAY HYDROGEN COULD ENTER THE CONTAINMENT WOULD BE VIA A BROKEN PIPE HOOKED UP AFTER ONE OF THESE SAFETY VALVES, WHICH WERE THE FIRST THING OUT OF THE REACTOR, AND THESE SAFETY VALVES NEVER OPENED, THERE IS NO WAY IN HELL ANY HYDROGEN EVER GOT INTO ANY OF THE CONTAINMENT STRUCTURES AT ALL. It was physically impossible, hydrogen could only have been an issue if the safety valves had functioned, which they did not. AND ON TOP OF THAT, EVEN IF all the piping coming out of the reactors was broken, WHICH IT WAS NOT, nothing would have leaked into the containments to cause an explosion anyway because the valves were all forced shut. If there was any break in any pipe it would have dropped the reactor pressures to ZERO with none of the pumps running as the official story states, thus allowing easy injection of water from the external pumps that were never part of normal operation but available and working perfectly. The high pressures alone proved Fukushima got through the earthquake unscathed because it took perfectly intact systems to hold back such high pressures.
The fact that they could not get water into the reactors because the pressures were too high, all the while NO steam came out of those smoke stacks proves that ALL the reactors remained perfectly sealed until they exploded, and the only thing that could cause an explosion with the reactors sealed off, thus not allowing any hydrogen out, would be a reactor pressure vessel breach at pressures over 3,000 PSI, and THAT would be enough to do the damage we witnessed at reactors 1 and 2. So, to sum it up - The only way Hydrogen could have gotten out of any of the reactors is if one or more of the safety valves let it out, and if any one of those valves had opened enough to let it out there would not have been the extreme pressures inside the reactors, which prevented external water injection. This nails Israel's butt to the wall, the disaster at reactors 1 and 2 was STUXNET ALL THE WAY.Stuxnet is the only way all the control rooms would have given normal readouts while everything went kablooey. Such normal readouts that the engineers sent people to put water in the reactors with external pumps, only to discover that the pumps could not overcome the 3,000 plus PSI in the reactors when in no case it should have ever exceeded 1160 PSI. Stuxnet is the only way 39 separate hair trigger safety release valves which were designed to go off with only a fraction of a single percent over pressure could have failed while in fully mechanical automatic mode, and then totally failed (all 39 of them) in forced release mode as well. Reactor pressure vessel breaches are the only way the containment structures could have been destroyed with all the safety valves shut, therefore blocking any way for the hydrogen to enter the containment structures. You cannot have a hydrogen release from inside the reactors, while having reactor pressures be through the roof because all the valves are jammed shut, the two situations cannot coexist
Catch 22, CHECK MATE.
You can forget talking about how hydrogen could never have destroyed the containments, when the real issue is the fact that with the safety release valves held shut by a virus, there is no way any hydrogen got out of the reactors anyway. The hydrogen explosion story is beyond laughable in more ways than one. You can thank Arnie Gundersen and the lying ziopress for the silence on this issue, it's no wonder why the press avoided interviewing real reactor engineers with regard to this topic, having only their little Arnie as the "expert". Why only Arnie? Is he the only one? Other than my interview of one of the engineers who designed unit 3, the press interviewed absolutely NO ONE ELSE. See anything fishy with that?Of course. But with Fukushima and the entire earthquake and tsunami being an act of war, and that war being waged by Israel, the first casualty is the truth and there is no way on earth the ziopress would ever let the big secret go. That would be like trying to get CNN to tell the truth about building 7 on 9/11.
Censorship has destroyed the original references, but I found a few new ones that prove what is above.
Since the safety release valves automatically let go at 1160 PSI, a fraction of a percent over operating pressure, WHY ON EARTH were they remaining shut at 1.5X operating pressure on March 12, when this nuclear engineer talked about what was going on out there? He points out that the safety release valve story was very strange: Surviving evidence 1Another piece of surviving evidence, though totally messed up now And I'd like to ask, why can't this be found easily anymore?
Here is a good one talking about the high pressure levels in the reactors, pressures NOT POSSIBLE if the safety systems were not disabled. high pressures in the reactors
Since practically everything regarding not being able to get water into the reactors due to ultra high presssures prior to the explosions has been censored, tomorrow's gem is going to be proof of reactor 3's core ejection, thus making the initial cleanup possible only with remote control and robots, all of which was documented but is totally expunged from the web except for one reference now. And what happened to the Fukushima 50? People died of radiation poisoning out there, WHERE ARE THEIR STORIES? I will post the remote control and robots link now, in case they kill it overnight. Read it while you still can, WHERE WAS THIS IN THE ZIOPRESS??!!??
_______________________________________________I am getting airtime deleted again, and am now using Starbucks. I don't know what triggered it this time, but I know how to get even.
I said from the beginning that I had a lot more info on Fukushima that I never released in the initial report, because that report was too long as it was. I am releasing that info and clarifying the Fukushima report NOW.
The "hydrogen explosions" at Fukushima were not possible.
A few scientific points that prove it
People have the misconception that hydrogen can explode all by itself, when in fact it needs oxygen to combust at all. And during the time period when the blasts occurred out at Fukushima, the containment structures were all completely purged of oxygen and had nothing but nitrogen in the reactor containments. It is not a requirement to be able to purge a nuclear containment structure of all oxygen leaving only nitrogen and therefore no explosion potential from any fuel that needs oxygen to combust, but at Fukushima that is exactly how the Japanese set it up.Many people are under the misconception that hydrogen and oxygen were produced inside the reactors at the same time
That is not how the reaction works. The entire proposed reason for hydrogen to have been present is the assumption that the reactors did not have enough water in them, which allowed the reactor cores to exceed 2000 degrees celsius. If that happens, the zircon cladding which covers the nuclear fuel in each pellet will rob the oxygen out of the water molecules in the saturated steam inside the reactor, and release only the hydrogen. So there is no oxygen buildup at the same time because it all gets captured by the zircon, and therefore no explosion potential due to free hydrogen because there is no oxygen released for the hydrogen to react with. In addition to this, hard vent stacks were present at Fukushima which were specifically designed to vent any hydrogen produced. When you add the vent stacks to the equation, it introduces yet another layer of impossibility to the hydrogen explosion hoax.1. There is never any oxygen produced inside ANY reactor of the type out at Fukushima even during the worst case scenario.
2. Hard vent stacks were in place to vent all hydrogen outside and release it 500 feet up in the air.
3. All the reactor containments had been nitrogen purged, thus eliminating entirely ANY hydrogen explosion possibility, even if it was being released in copious amounts directly into the reactor containments.
4. The reactor containments had solid concrete walls up to 12 feet thick in some places, which absolutely NO hydrogen explosion even at it's worst theoretical maximum could possibly do anything to AT ALL, yet they were mostly atomized to the finest dust at reactor 3, and whatever large pieces were left were blown to smithereens. To say a little loose gas could do that is the Hollywood equivalent of the Rambo arrow, where an ounce or two of explosive material can wipe out an entire enemy force.
Chemical reactions have their limits, and for anyone to have dreamed up hydrogen destroying ultra robust reactor structures is a foray into burn the witch ignorance. There is no doubt a Hollywood crew worked on this particular false flag, where events happened that were leaps of logic even Hollywood would seldom aspire to.
In reality, reactors 1 and 2 suffered pressure vessel breaches at 3000 PSI after being pushed to full thermal output with all the safety release valves closed by the Stuxnet virus, (a fact easily proven but I ignored because the Fuku report was getting too long anyway) and reactors 3 and 4 were destroyed by nuclear weapons because reactor 4 could not be destroyed with a virus while it was mothballed, and reactor 3 had too many additional safety systems in place to make it easy to kill, even with a virus. The pressure vessel breaches, and proof of virus sabotage will be tomorrow's topic. And there is absolute proof of pressure vessel breaches at ultra high pressure in droves at reactors 1 and 2, and that only a virus could have caused it, but I never discussed that because the real issue was reactors 3 and 4.
This is a portion of the additional information I said I had about Fukushima right from the beginning but did not discuss because the report was already too long for mass public consumption. Since my mailboxes are totally censored of all decent news tips, and the NSA has chosen to destroy the forums and comment sections everywhere on the web with that new supercomputer at that "data center" in Utah, the only thing remaining to convey truth is hard set web sites such as this one, where a comment cannot vanish into nowhere, and what else is there to talk about when damn near everything else is censored anyway?
And if multiple gigabytes of bandwidth are going to continue to be deleted from the cell modems, which I can't afford to repeatedly recharge, which prevents me from getting out onto the web anyway, I will work with the information I already have and clarify a few points regarding Fukushima and steal a few minutes here and there from open wifi connections to upload it. I don't need airtime AT ALL.
Tomorrow's topic: Carbon expulsion from the reactor cores at
units 1 and 2. Proof of ultra high PSI pressure vessel breaches, which
with the safety systems installed at those two reactors, would never
have been possible absent willful destruction no matter what the
scenario. Huge pressure vessel breaches where the pressure vessels
contain saturated steam at 3000+ PSI absolutely WILL blow through huge
thick concrete walls, to the extent we saw at reactors 1 and 2.
Reactors 1 and 2 had 11 automatic safety valves at each reactor, and
even one of those valves can totally depressurize a reactor. These
safety valves automatically go off at 1,160 PSI unless they are told by a
powered command to stay shut. These were hooked directly up to the
hard vent stacks, (the big white ones in all the photos) which would
have vented the reactors (absent willful sabotage) rather than allowing
them to explode and compared to having the reactors explode, they
release virtually no radiation.
IF the situation at Fuku happened as stated in the ziopress, ALL of the
hard vent stacks should have been blowing steam like the gates of hell
and beyond prior to anything happening to the reactors AT ALL.
Cumulatively we are talking about having to release enough steam at a
minimum (to match the ziopress scenario) to dissipate 12 gigawatts of
power, and realistically, considering what happened, enough steam to
dissipate 27 gigawatts. The fact no steam was released AT ALL when
Tepco workers could not push water into the reactors against a head
pressure in excess of 2600 PSI when the automatic safety release happens
at 1,160 proves the safety pressure releases were receiving a command
to stay shut from a SABOTAGED Siemens Scada controller, and the only way
that could have been accomplished is with the well documented Israeli
owned Stuxnet virus, delivered by Israeli "security firm" Magna BSP.
The fact that the control room operators even considered it possible to
inject water into the reactors proves they were getting normal pressure
readouts when the pressures were in fact off the charts which made
manual water injection impossible, a fact the engineers would have been
aware of absent control room readout sabotage. That is specifically
what Stuxnet is designed to do. That is tomorrows topic.
Go ahead. Censor all the forums and comment sections around the web,
delete all my incoming e-mails and kill the modems more. I have plenty
to write about and all the evidence is already here, on back up. I'll
just snipe open wifi connections for a few brief moments each day to
post what is typed offline.
Line itemed Fukushima report to be done
Since I have been banned from receiving meaningful whistleblowing mail, and the forums and blogs are now almost completely devoid of content since the new NSA data center went online, I am going to get even with their worst nightmare, the report that caused all the problems to begin with.Here is the first clarification of the Fukushima report
Many people were not able to read through the entire Fukushima report, let alone understand it. So many people do not know that even according to the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the generators were never submerged, and never failed.That's right, the generators were NEVER submerged, and NEVER failed
Here is what really happened - All of the backup generators located at units 1-4 were inside the turbine building, which flooded to a depth of 4 feet at it's lowest level in the basement which was not enough water to cause trouble for the generators, which were higher than that, and on top of it, were giant industrial generators with huge footings that kept them out of any water that did enter the turbine building.In addition to this, the fuel tanks were never compromised by the tsunami. After I clearly pointed out that the generators never got submerged, a lie was hatched that the tsunami washed the fuel tanks away. And that is a bold faced lie.
Here is what really happened
All of the backup generators for units 1-4 came online after the earthquake, and before the tsunami arrived, 7 out of 8 mysteriously shut off all by themselves. The only one that remained running was the final emergency reserve that was never hooked up to a Stuxnet infected Siemens Scada controller, so it never received a virus command to shut down. This one generator was enough to run all the cooling pumps at ALL 4 reactor sites at that section of Fukushima Diiachi. The big question is then, since it remained running throughout the entire disaster, why was it not able to run any cooling pumps? ANSWER: Because despite not being hooked up to the Scada system, the electrical switch gear (which was also inside and never got flooded) was hooked up to the SCADA system and with Israel's cute little Stuxnet virus in place that switch gear refused to transfer power to the plant from the outside feed lines to the one generator that was still running. Further examination revealed that outside power was never lost as well, and that all that happened was the virus also shut down the outside feed. So with 7 out of 8 generators shut down by the virus, on top of the outside feed being cut, and the one remaining generator not being allowed to provide power, a lie was hatched that the tsunami took out the generators, when in fact it did not.But wait, there's more!
There were six units out at Fukushima, not 4 as most people think. Reactors 5 and 6 had their own back up generators which never received ANY water of any sort. These generators, 7 in total, were perfectly able to be switched on to provide power to reactors 1-4, and functioned perfectly throughout the entire disaster, but were never allowed to divert their power to reactors 1-4 because the virus infected electrical switches were never allowed to divert power from reactors 5 and 6 to reactors 1-4.And now, here is where it really gets crazy.
Despite the lies told about ruined roads leading into Fuku, all were perfectly intact, and the International Nuclear Regulatory Commission made it a clear point in their own Fuku report that Tepco successfully brought in emergency backup diesel generators on flat bed semi trucks, hooked them up to the main power feed within 8 hours, (a full day before anything went kablooey) and for a "technical reason" they were denied the ability to feed back up power to the reactors because the electrical switch gear refused to connect the cooling pumps (the real technical reason being Magna BSP and the Stuxnet virus) even after the switch gear was replaced multiple times to clear the "failures".And the punch line, which will be covered more clearly later:
All of the affected reactors had completely non electrical backup systems which used steam from the reactors themselves to turn the cooling pumps, but because the entire system was infected with a virus, all of the valves, which automatically open to actuate the passive backup system absent a command from the controller to stay shut, stayed shut and this is what really caused the disaster. Since it is well documented that Stuxnet is specifically designed to interfere with the activation of valves and pumps, it's a no brainer what really caused the Fuku disaster. A little hint - Don't let Israeli security companies handle ANY security for you, most of them are branches of the IDF.If you want to know what is coming next, I suggest you try to read the Fukushima report in full, but I know it's a tedious and technical read. These little blurbs I am going to put up will be a lot easier to understand. And all the links to everything discussed in these little blurbs are in the Fuku report so don't look for them here.
I'd like to throw in here that it was really cool to censor everything being sent to this web site through the mail, because now the only rational response to get news is to line item the Fuku report, which could go on ad nauseum because it is such a huge topic. And with all of it perfectly documented, I'd like to see what kind of a boost this gives to the zionist image. And if you manage to kill this web site off worse than you have, I won't shut up anyway. I find it curious that the Israelis can nuke at will and none of it makes news, but proven mushroom clouds and whited out sensors from miles away will be the downfall of the lying ziopress, you can't stop every Iphone, and if you do, what about Motorola? The fact that you manage to keep the truth about this out of your ziopress only lends creedence to the Fukushima report, if you can sit straight faced and mute with a mushroom cloud on the horizon, WHAT ELSE can you bury under a lie of silence? http://jimstonefreelance.com/index.htmlYou Won’t BELIEVE What’s Going On with Government Spying on Americans
New Revelations Are Breaking Every Day
Revelations about the breathtaking scope of government spying are coming so fast that it’s time for an updated roundup:- Just weeks after NSA boss Alexander said that a review of NSA spying found not even one violation, the Washington Post published an internal NSA audit showing that the agency has broken its own rules thousands of times each year
- Each violation could have resulted in many Americans being spied upon. The ACLU notes, “some of these incidents seem to have implicated the privacy of thousands or millions of innocent people”
- EFF points out: “The thousands of violations only include the NSA’s main office in Maryland—not the other—potentially hundreds—of other NSA offices across the country. And even more importantly, the documents published by the Post reveal violations increasing every year”
- 2 Senators on the intelligence committee said the violations revealed in the Post article were just the “tip of the iceberg”
- Glenn Greenwald notes: “One key to the WashPost story: the reports are internal, NSA audits, which means high likelihood of both under-counting & white-washing”.(Even so, the White House tried to do damage control by retroactively changing on-the-record quotes)
- The government is spying on essentially everything we do. It is not just “metadata” … although that is enough to destroy your privacy
- The government has adopted a secret interpretation of the Patriot Act which allows it to pretend that “everything” is relevant … so it spies on everyone
- NSA whistleblowers say that the NSA collects all of our conversations word-for-word
- It’s not just the NSA … Many other agencies, like the FBI and IRS – concerned only with domestic issues – spy on Americans as well
- The information gained through spying is shared with federal, state and local agencies, and they are using that information to prosecute petty crimes such as drugs and taxes. The agencies are instructed to intentionally “launder” the information gained through spying, i.e. to pretend that they got the information in a more legitimate way … and to hide that from defense attorneys and judges
- Indeed, they say that mass spying actually hurts U.S. counter-terror efforts.
- They say we can, instead, keep everyone safe without violating the Constitution … more cheaply and efficiently than the current system
- There is no real oversight by Congress, the courts, or the executive branch of government. And see this and this.
- Indeed, most Congress members have no idea what the NSA is doing. Even staunch defenders of the NSA now say they’ve been kept in the dark
- A Federal judge who was on the secret spying court for 3 years says that it’s a kangaroo court
- Even the current judges on the secret spying court now admit that they’re out of the loop and powerless to exercise real oversight
- A former U.S. president says that the spying program shows that we no longer have a functioning democracy
- The chairs of the 9/11 Commission say that NSA spying has gone way too far
- Top constitutional experts say that Obama and Bush are worse than Nixon … and the Stasi East Germans
-
While the government initially claimed that mass surveillance on Americans prevented more than 50 terror attacks, the NSA’s deputy director John Inglis walked that position back all the way to saying that – at the most – one (1) plot might have been disrupted by the bulk phone records collection alone. In other words, the NSA can’t prove that stopped any terror attacks. The government greatly exaggerated an alleged recent terror plot for political purposes (and promoted the fearmongering of serial liars). The argument that recent terror warnings show that NSA spying is necessary is so weak that American counter-terrorism experts have slammed it as “crazy pants”
- Even President Obama admits that you’re much less likely to be killed by terrorists than a car accident. So the government has resorted to lamer and lamer excuses to try to justify mass surveillance
- Experts say that the spying program is illegal, and is exactly the kind of thing which King George imposed on the American colonists … which led to the Revolutionary War
- The top counter-terrorism Czar under Clinton and Bush says that revealing NSA spying programs does not harm national security
- The feds are considering prosecuting the owner of a private email company – who shut down his business rather than turning over records to the NSA – for refusing to fork over the information and keep quiet. This is a little like trying to throw someone in jail because he’s died and is no longer paying taxes
- Whistleblowers on illegal spying have no “legal” way to get the information out
- There are indications that the government isn’t just passively gathering the information … but is actively using it for mischievous purposes
- Governments and big corporations are doing everything they can to destroy anonymity
- Mass spying creates an easy mark for hackers. Indeed, the Pentagon now sees the collection of “big data” as a “national security threat” … but the NSA is the biggest data collector on the planet, and thus provides a tempting mother lode of information for foreign hackers
- Mass surveillance by the NSA directly harms internet companies, Silicon Valley, California … and the entire U.S. economy. And see these reports from Boingboing and the Guardian
- Some people make a lot of money off of mass spying. But the government isn’t using the spying program to stop the worst types of lawlessness
- Polls show that the public doesn’t believe the NSA … and thinks that the government has gone way too far in the name of terrorism
- While leaker Edward Snowden is treated as a traitor by the fatcats and elites, he is considered a hero by the American public
- Congress members are getting an earful from their constituents about mass surveillance
- The heads of the intelligence services have repeatedly been caught lying about spying. And even liberal publications are starting to say that Obama has been intentionally lying about spying
- Only 11% of Americans trust Obama to actually do anything to rein in spying
- A huge majority of Americans wants the director of intelligence – Clapper – prosecuted for perjury
- While the Obama administration is spying on everyone in the country – it is at the same time the most secretive administration ever (background). That’s despite Obama saying he’s running the most transparent administration ever
- A Congressman noted that – even if a mass surveillance program is started for good purposes – it will inevitably turn into a witch hunt
- Surveillance can be used to frame you if someone in government happens to take a dislike to you
- Government spying has always focused on crushing dissent … not on keeping us safe
- An NSA whistleblower says that the NSA is spying on – and blackmailing – top government officials and military officers (and see this)
- High-level US government officials have warned for 40 years that mass surveillance would lead to tyranny in America
- A top NSA whistleblower says that the only way to fix things is to fire all of the corrupt government officials who let it happen. As the polls above show, the American public is starting to wake up to that fact
Retail Expert Davidowitz: Wal-Mart's Woes Stem From Economy in 'State of Collapse'
Thursday, 15 Aug 2013,
"Wal-Mart is a terrific operator," Davidowitz tells Yahoo. "They didn't suddenly become stupid. ... The economy is in a state of collapse. That's what's going on."
The world's biggest retailer cut its full-year profit forecast after second-quarter profit came in below analysts' expectations.
The employment situation illustrates the weakness of the U.S. economy. Of the new jobs generated this year, 75 percent are low-wage, part-time, Davidowitz explains.
Real unemployment, including those who have stopped looking for work and are working fewer hours than they want, is 14 percent, he adds.
"Business is bad in America," Davidowitz notes. "Look at our GDP [gross domestic product] growth. We're growing at 1.5 percent. That means we can't produce jobs."
The economy expanded at an average rate of 1.4 percent in the first and second quarters.
"I don't think we're in a recession right now, but I think there's a 50 percent chance we'll be in a recession next year," Davidowitz predicts.
Meanwhile, government debt has exploded to $17 trillion, he notes. "We've spent all the money, we've borrowed all the money and we're in the tank."
To be sure, some experts say Wal-Mart is responsible for its own difficulties. Brian Sozzi, chief equities strategist at Belus Capital Advisors puts the blame on Wal-Mart's activity overseas and in e-commerce.
"Investments to address international, from uncompetitive prices and poorly laid out stores, continue with no visible sign they are driving improved results, while the company is pouring large sums of money into e-commerce to compete with Amazon," he writes in a report obtained by Business Insider.
Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.moneynews.com/newswidget/Wal-Mart-Davidowitz-economy-jobs/2013/08/15/id/520624?promo_code=10E2C-1&utm_source=10E2Canadafreepress&utm_medium=nmwidget&utm_campaign=widgetphase1#ixzz2cKylbjLS
NEW DELHI, India — Five Indian soldiers and one Pakistani civilian lie dead, victims of skirmishes on the disputed Kashmir border.
But the real target of the violence may well be Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif, as Pakistan’s military and intelligence services try to thwart the newly elected leader’s aspirations for peace with India.
“The intention here is to sabotage the peace process,” said Michael Kugelman, an expert on South Asia affiliated with the Woodrow Wilson Center.
“This is a sad reality of India-Pakistan relations — whenever things are looking up, a saboteur tries to send all progress up in smoke.”
The region has been on the boil since five Indian soldiers were killed in an ambush in the Poonch sector of India-administered Kashmir last week. India said Pakistani soldiers were to blame, and Pakistan disavowed the attack.
The incident has sparked a series of cross-border skirmishes that each country has accused the other of starting. It has all-but scuttled hopes that Sharif and his Indian counterpart, Manmohan Singh, will anytime soon be able to resume peace negotiations.
The so-called composite dialogue dates back to January 2004. It was called off following the November 2008 Mumbai terrorist attack, which India believes were perpetrated with the aid of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency. Until this week, the formal talks had been set to resume this month. Now even an informal meeting between Singh and Sharif on the sidelines of the September UN General Assembly is at risk.
The situation is scary, experts say. Kashmir – a divided territory that both India and Pakistan claim as their own – was the cause of two of the three wars the two countries have fought since they attained independence from Britain in 1947. Now both New Delhi and Islamabad control numerous nukes; Pakistan has the world’s fastest growing arsenal.
As the tit-for-tat bombardment continues, the shelling already marks the heaviest exchangesince the ceasefire began in 2003, raising fears that the repeated violations will result in a complete breakdown of the truce. Signaling their concern about further escalation, both Washington and the UN have appealed for calm.
But which side is responsible for starting the fire? What is the endgame? And how far will the flames spread before cooler heads prevail?
Indian analysts remain convinced that Pakistan uses such shelling to provide cover for jihadi militants crossing the border to attack installations in India-administered Kashmir. By India’s tally, there have already been 42 such ceasefire violations in 2013, compared with 28 in 2012,according to India Today. Meanwhile, this year 40 members of India’s security forces in the area have been killed, compared with 17 the year before.
For Indians looking to explain who broke the truce this time, that’s a smoking gun.
“If you just take the common sensical point of view, India has no interest [in breaking the ceasefire], because we are not sending in infiltrators under cover of fire,” said former Indian foreign secretary Kanwal Sibal. “We have no reason to fire unilaterally because what do we then hope to achieve? We don’t score any points either bilaterally or internationally.”
Pakistan-watchers, however, argue that its army no longer provides such support for jihadi groups, and hint that the ambush story may have been a ploy by India, or a local Indian commander, to trigger hostilities.
Admitting that Pakistani generals “may have” helped jihadis cross into India in the past, for instance, Pakistan-born Shuja Nawaz, director of the South Asia Center at the Atlantic Council, said that policy was ended under former president General Pervez Musharraf, and it would be “surprising if it is being activated again.”
Nawaz also questioned why India first called the alleged ambush an attack by “persons dressed in Pakistani uniforms” – only later referring to it as an army assault – and why top military officials allowed tempers to flare for two days before activating a hotline intended to defuse these situations.
“What is surprising is that the Director General Military Operations did not activate the hotline till two days [after the alleged ambush]. Why?” said Nawaz.
Experts agree it’s not likely that Sharif’s civilian government officially sanctioned the alleged ambush of Indian soldiers. But it may well have had the active or tacit support of the military-intelligence combine, or “deep state,” that holds the real power in Pakistan. Moreover, though the ceasefire is expected to hold, the ambush and subsequent saber rattling in Pakistan certainly establishes that its new prime minister — for all his talk of peace — must overcome enormous obstacles in his own country before he can think of negotiating with India.
“Overarching all this is the fact that during the election campaign, [Sharif] spoke about his desire to improve relations with India, and there was an exchange of special envoys pretty quickly,” said India’s Sibal.
“There was hope that he might be able to begin turning a new page. But under his watch all the wrong things are happening…. Jihadi organizations [and] what they call the ‘deep state’ in Pakistan [i.e. the army and intelligence apparatus] seem to be at work.”
While Sharif has continued to preach peace since his June election, his army and spy agency don’t seem to be listening. That’s because both have vested interests in stoking fears of an Indian attack — lest they face a sustained drive to curtail their powers, or, worse, a deep cut to the defense budget.
On August 3, terrorists whom India claims have links to Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence agency (ISI) attacked the Indian consulate in Jalalabad, Afghanistan.
Meanwhile, Islamabad allowed alleged terrorist Hafiz Saeed to lead Eid prayers before a massive throng at the Gaddafi stadium in Lahore on August 9. India and the US accuse him of leading of Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Indians accuse of masterminding the 2008 attacks on Mumbai; Washington DC has a $10 million bounty on his head. The Eid prayers were not a one-off. Saeed also led several thousand supporters in a Lahore parade on August 14, to mark Pakistan’s independence day.
And amidst the shelling this week, Pakistan’s finance minister announced that a plan to grant India “most favored nation” status – once viewed an easily attained step that would be good for both countries – is now off the table.
“Neither side wants war nor does either profit from a conflict escalating beyond [Kashmir’s Line of Control]. Local commanders, especially newly posted ones to the region, flex their muscles. But this is a dangerous game,” said the Atlantic Council’s Nawaz.
Worse still, the game is set to grow more perilous with the approach of 2014 – when the rules will change, according to the Woodrow Wilson Center’s Kugelman. The US withdrawal from Afghanistan will leave India and Pakistan contending for influence there, while the exit of US troops will again make India and Kashmir the number one target for Pakistan-based terrorist groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba.
Meanwhile, in the face of continued provocations since the 2008 attacks on Mumbai, India’s capacity for restraint may have reached its limits, Kugelman worries. And the election slated for May 2014 will put added pressure on Singh’s government to take a hard line.
“As India’s election grows closer, any consequent LoC hostilities could conceivably lead to escalation,” Kugelman said. “And that’s a scary thought.”
Working in top secret over a period of 17 years, Russian and
American scientists collaborated to remove hundreds of pounds of
plutonium and highly enriched uranium — enough to construct at least a
dozen
The report sheds light on a mysterious $150
million cleanup operation paid for in large part by the United States,
whose specialists feared that terrorists would discover the fissile
material and use it to build a dirty bomb.
Over the years, hints emerged that something
extraordinarily dangerous had been left behind in a warren of
underground tunnels — like the American aerial drones that circled over the site, looking for intruders, or the steel-reinforced concrete that was poured into tunnels and over stretches of earth.
Among the report’s new revelations is that the
Soviet testers left behind components, including high-purity plutonium,
that could have been used to build not just a dirty bomb but a
“relatively sophisticated nuclear device,” an American official told the
report’s authors.
American scientists spent years trying to coax information about Soviet-era testing from their counterparts in Russia.
It was a white-knuckled effort at times, since
local scavengers in search of scrap metal were regularly digging
“within yards” of the fissile material.
Siegfried S. Hecker, a former director of the
Los Alamos National Laboratory, described his astonishment when he first
visited the site in 1998, cruising past unattended gates.
“When I went out there, I was expecting to see
guys on camels, pulling on copper cables,” Mr. Hecker told the authors.
Instead, he saw miles of trenches that had been dug by teams with
excavating machines — evidence of what he called “a major industrial
enterprise,” which dug up miles of irradiated copper cable and sold it
to Chinese dealers.
Mr. Hecker concluded that the site contained
nuclear material “in reasonably concentrated form, easily picked up,
completely open to whoever wants to come.”
The report describes a project driven forward
almost entirely by Russian and American scientists, without the
“elaborate, negotiated state-to-state agreements of the kind used for
arms control during the cold war.”
Mr. Hecker said he understood his
counterparts’ reluctance; the mixture of plutonium isotopes used in
Russian nuclear bombs was a closely guarded secret that Americans might
discover if they gained access to the tunnels.
Mr. Hecker recalled going to a small city in
Russia for an informal meeting with Radi Ikayev, director of the first
Soviet nuclear-weapons laboratory, and showing him photographs of the
excavating that was going on at the site, in Semipalatinsk.
“Radi was just silent,” Mr. Hecker recalled.
“He just looked at me, and looked at the photos. And he said, ‘I’ll have
someone talk to you in the morning.’ ”
From that point onward, a handful of Russian
scientists began sharing information about the site. Underneath a
formation called Degelen Mountain, 209 nuclear tests had been carried
out in 181 tunnels, coating the earthen walls with plutonium residue;
but not all the devices had detonated. Pure plutonium and highly
enriched uranium remained, in chunks or inside the duds.
The Russians also knew about explosions that
had been set off inside large metal containers called Kolbas, some of
which had been left deep within the maze of tunnels.
Mr. Hecker then showed the same photographs to
high-level American officials, warning them that scavengers could
recover as much as 440 pounds of plutonium at the site.
In 1999, on the margins of an international
nonproliferation conference, the United States agreed to finance the
cleanup effort; Russia agreed to provide information and scientists; and
Kazakhstan to do the fieldwork. The signers celebrated their agreement
with vodka toasts, beginning a project that would stretch on for more
than 10 years, as scavengers penetrated closer to fissile material. Step
by step, the team began encasing the fissile material in cement,
rendering it virtually unusable in a bomb.
When a New York Times reporter visited the site in 2011, the effort was shrouded by a heavy veil of secrecy.
“People ask me, are we doing the right thing,
closing access to the tunnels?” said the official overseeing the test
site, Kairat K. Kadyrzhanov, general director of the National Nuclear
Center, at the time. “And I say I do not know what is there, and I do
not have the right to know.”
The effort had a year and a half to go at that
point. In October 2012, Mr. Kadyrzhanov was one of a small group of
scientists — American, Russian and Kazakh — who gathered for a picnic to
mark the completion of the cleanup. A monument now stands at the site,
with the inscription: “1996-2012. The world has become safer.”
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)