THE COUP OF THE HYDRA AND THE ANGLO AMERICAN WORLD EMPIRE

• Posted on August 13, 2014
• by Wes
• in Articles

THE COUP OF THE HYDRA
AND THE ANGLO AMERICAN WORLD EMPIRE

People will tell you that the world “changed” on September 11th, 2001. However it seems that those who say this are unaware that they are only half right. The world did change on September 11th, a September 11th, where government had changed without firing a shot or without the trauma of flying planes into buildings. This September 11th was in the year 1990.
The senior Bush speaking on that day declared that the new World order would be established. A New World Order that would start with bloody wars and purging the earth of what could only be described as undesirable cannon fodder to bring about dread and to keep America in a mode of “mob psychosis.” You see human life was diminished on that day and common sense, morality, and compassion was thrown out for the guilty pleasures of prejudice. This was our new world Order and we would be the benefactors of such blood lust.
We need to remember that the New World Order is a buzz word for criticism because it is usually associated with crank conspiracy theory. However we must give credit where credit is due to the various government officials who have used this term as their edict to change the world through a series of traumatic wars and attacks. There has been a long standing attempt at a bloody Coup d’état that would certainly shock the world if it were revealed as such.
However since it is organized and highly supported by the shadow government and other world planners we give it the marketing title made famous by George Herbert Walker Bush.
The New World Order declaration set the backdrop for continued war and the need for changes in the laws that govern fair play in conducting war. The reason this had to be done was because war plans were constantly stifled by popular resistance. The plans had to change in order to persuade the population that these wars were required for “freedom.” The population had to be frightened to get them to back a war, to give up their lives for the cause. It’s traditional for rulers to create pretexts for war.
We have discussed the open air assassinations, the theories by John Shelby Downard of the King Kill 33 and we all know that the trauma based attack on the World Trade Center and the emotional investment that was made by the American people led to victimization and vengeance.
It was the impetus and pretext for a war that we will never stop fighting.
The Blood Cement has laid the foundation for the New World Order or the Anglo American World Empire.
The philosophy of the New World Order is not new. Historians are very much aware of what the term means and where it originates. The purpose is to turn people into a slave labor force for government.
Throughout history the elite have created and groomed charismatic leaders to lead people into following their whims. They also control these leaders, provide them with assistance and in some cases kill them off in order to bring about trauma based control of the people. There have been many instances of King killing rituals in history from Jesus Christ to John F. Kennedy.
After the trauma of the assassination on Kennedy we were hearing about the foundations of the New World Order. Johnson had “The New Deal” and “The Great Society.” They were just other names given to disguise the intent of the elite to create the Anglo American World Empire or the New World Order. This was just the beginning of NWO agents in power pushing the agenda of global empire.
Richard Nixon was a protégé of the powerful Father of the Bush dynasty. Prescott Bush unsuccessfully attempted to overthrow the administration of Franklin Roosevelt by using Wall Street and business men who were Nazi sympathizers to bankrupt the country and create a National Socialist Order. Nixon lost his bid for the Presidency against Kennedy in 1960. Nixon was elected president in 1972.
When Nixon resigned from his presidential post he was replaced by Gerald Ford. Ford, a member of the Warren Commission, the group that investigated the Kennedy assassination appointed George Herbert Walker Bush as CIA Director. This was at the crucial time the House Select Committee on Assassinations was investigating CIA-FBI links to the murders of John F Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther King. This was also the time that countless witnesses were murdered right before their scheduled appearances to testify under oath before the House Assassination Committee. There were two assassination attempts on President Ford in 1975.
The attempts were carried out by victims of mind control. Lynette Squeaky Fromme who was a follower of CIA mind controlled murderer Charles Manson attempted to shoot Ford and 17 days later a mind controlled FBI Informant Sarah Jane Moore attempted to kill the President. Moore was a childhood acquaintance of Manson when they grew up together in West Virginia.
Someone with a motive for the new world order obviously programmed these assassins so that they could bring about change. Both were part of the CIA MK Ultra Program. Mind control techniques were mastered by the Nazis and their secrets were brought over to the U.S. during operation Paper Clip. All well funded by American politicians and business men that were secretly Nazi “New World Order” pundits. The well known Nazi sympathizers in America were The Bush’s, the Ford’s, the Harriman’s and even Joseph Kennedy Sr.
One of the shadow men behind the scenes at the Kennedy assassination was none other than George H.W. Bush. J Edgar Hoover wanted to speak with him about Castro terrorists and Cuban intelligence and possible connections to the assassination.
History does not place George H.W. Bush in Dallas during the assassination of Kennedy.
In fact when George H.W. Bush is asked where he was when Kennedy was killed he certainly does not recall either.
It is documented that Bush was in Dallas, Texas the morning of the assassination, took a flight to Tyler, Texas afterwards to announce to a group of Kiwanis club members that the President had died and then phoned the FBI to tell them that he had an idea who was responsible for the death of President Kennedy.
This way it could be said that he was in Tyler and not in Dallas that day and still he knew or had some idea who might have killed the President.
However, Bush will tell people that he doesn’t remember where he was on November 22nd, 1963.
When “Poppy” Bush was picked to be director of the CIA in 1976, he testified to Congress that he had never worked for the CIA before. Of course, it did not make much sense to appoint a director who had no such back- ground but Congress had approved him anyway. Now it would seem that Bush committed perjury in his congressional testimony.
George Bush was apparently high enough in the CIA to help plan the Bay of Pigs invasion. It would probably be safe to assume that he even named the operation and its two ships The “Barbra” and the “Houston.” Considering the hatred that the CIA felt toward Kennedy over their failed mission and Bush’s involvement in that same mission, it would be quite interesting to know what Bush’s feelings toward John F. Kennedy really were and what his full role in the assassination investigation was.
Bush became Vice President under Ronald Reagan still holding on to his ties to the CIA. Just 69 days later, there is an assassination attempt on Ronald Reagan by gunman John Hinckley Junior.
John Hinckley Jr. is the son of John Hinckley Sr., chairman of the oil company Vanderbilt Energy Corp., one of Vice President George H.W. Bush’s larger political and financial supporters in his 1980 presidential primary campaign against Ronald Reagan. Also, John Hinckley Jr.’s older brother, Vanderbilt vice president Scott Hinckley, and the Vice President’s son Neil Bush, had a dinner appointment scheduled for the day after the assassination attempt took place. Coincidence?
George Herbert Walker Bush eventually became President but was a one term president. He was defeated by Bill Clinton. It wasn’t a total loss, and the New World Order was well on its way to being established, because Clinton has also been involved with the establishment order and the continuity of corruption.
As a college student at Georgetown University, Bill Clinton worked as a driver. One day, he drove Senator Hale Boggs to the airport. Boggs was a member of the Warren Commission and an outspoken critic of the single-shooter magic bullet theory. Boggs tipped his driver, got on the plane, flew to Alaska, he and Nick Begich senior were never seen again. Clinton has had various unreported ties to the CIA and rumored drug scandals with the Bush Family. He also had his education funded through his status as student operative for the CIA. Since Kennedy our leaders seem to have been CIA appointed intelligence operatives.
What you don’t realize is that the Bush family and its power associates in this country have been involved with gaining control of our economic stability and our intelligence operations to profit from war, genocide, corruption and rape of the U.S. Constitution. What they could not do on their own they had highly paid henchmen doing the work for them. What the henchmen couldn’t do on their own was delegated to those who own the media. You see there is a network of thieves and murderers controlling your history and creating predictive programming to get you to become a slave.
Does anyone see the pattern? All the same people are involved with all of the same shadowy activities. They are now in places of leadership. THEY are easily revealed. THEY are hiding in plain sight and they want us to remain stupid in order to continue their thieving and murderous ways.
Who are the hopefuls for the 2016 election?
Jeb Bush for the republican Ticket and Hillary Clinton for the democratic ticket.
I am sure you can see that we seem to be used to the same controllers and are more than happy to tap them to be our leaders as they answer to the cryptocracy that has held on to its power hold in this country.
We tend to see the same groups and names appear in history when nefarious activities occur. Groups like Skull and bones and the CIA. People like Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, Henry Kissinger, George Herbert Walker Bush, David Rockefeller, Bill Clinton, and Zbigniew Brzezinski . Also we are always being told about secret meetings being held by the Bilderberg Group, CFR, and the Tri-lateral commission. This small group of people rule the world and their financial power is vast. They have their tentacles in many things and have their grip on many individuals including Barack Obama.
Obama has a pedigree that is connected to the CIA and various organizations that very well have groomed him for his position. Obama is an agent of “social engineering” and may have been trained since childhood to be a world leader with “Special Operative” ambitions. This is not some new allegation. These facts are too creepy for the mainstream to reveal. They also answer a lot of questions about how a nation became emotionally invested in an inexperienced senator from Chicago.
He had the opportunity to defy his controllers, however he is simply an agent for the controllers who felt that they needed a man with an American charisma. He had to be seen as one of the people and not just some old school agent from the so called “Old men network” of the cryptocracy. The Cryptocracy has always wanted an empire or an imperial cult like network in order to create a globalist market place.
The so called New World Order has been the agenda for many years. There have been many called to be the leaders of this order but few are able to appeal to the people and compel them to follow. There are some officials that are agents and always have been agents of a secret cabal that have wanted to see the New World Order succeed.
Even if they have to kill innocent people to do it.
History is changed by those Social engineers who work with murderers and thieves. Those with power and money have at their disposal all kinds of agents that can program you or that can hunt down and destroy you. They can wipe out all of your friends, family and anybody else who may get in the way of their rise to ultimate power. They can create trauma based terror and coerce you into accepting things you wouldn’t dream of tolerating. With power and money you can even control the story of what really happened and control what the history books say about you.
The killers make history. The dead are written about, and the surviving victims are exploited and are left fearful for the next time for those in power decide to kill again. We are all looking for someone to save us from our peril. You can’t be saved in ignorance. You have been programmed to be stupid.
Unfortunately people have learned that it is best to play stupid and criticize those who try to be inquisitive. “Stupid is as stupid does.” “Life is a box of chocolates” if you take a bite out of a couple you can eliminate the caramels form the nuts. That’s the way they want it and most Americans are obliged to follow through and grant it.
It is becoming painfully apparent that America has allowed itself to sleep through history. Rather than awakening to the corruption and literal journey into despotism. Americans need to have their eyes pried open to see reality and even then many people will be content with not getting involved with the process of real change. Many are under the false assumption that a lot of what is going on doesn’t apply to them. That it applies to people who are either poor, uneducated, or in a minority group.
Abraham Lincoln once said that “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.”
And now we make a Liar out of Lincoln, because we have all been fooled. We can once again go back to asking “what went wrong?” There was no real positive change for the future. Only “chump” change touted as deliverance from “evil.”
It was all part of predictive programming and mass mind control. The country was programmed to accept this without thinking outside of the parameters of their own prejudice and polarization. Ground Zero Lounge warned everyone to avoid participating in handing government a blank check under the hypnotic overtures of programming. However the consensus was led into a trap by the power elite. People thought they were all smarter than this. That they wouldn’t fall for this again. They did. While we can all point the finger at someone calling them stupid for not “voting” we can all see that we will be affected by programmed decisions by those who did. No one will stop it– because most people are programmed to think it is positive “change.” They chose it, they will live with it.
The Social engineers are now using whatever means necessary to convince you that it is useless to resist central, establishment control. For the moment it has posited a counter-cultural alternative to such control which is actually a counterfeit, covertly emanating from the establishment itself. Central establishment control will be the eventual outcome from this Psy-op experiment.
Those in power conclude that the destruction and re-organization of our way of life is as unavoidable as entropy. They use cataclysmic climate models to tell us that extinction of the species is inevitable. They seem to be looking at human reduction as a way for global sustainability.
Those in power will tell you that you are the threat to yourself.
What we truly are is a threat to them.

Shutterstock.com

Ben Johnson http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/transhumanist-author-government-should-use-microchips-to-deny-births-to-the

---

Contraception, Population ControlThu Aug 14, 2014 - 

Author: Gvmt should use microchips to deny births to the ‘unworthy’

population control , zoltan istvan

Although he admits it “sounds blatantly authoritarian” and “violates just about every core value we possess in a free society,” a noted transhumanist author has said a world government body should forcibly sterilize anyone “deemed unworthy” of parenthood by using implanted microchips.
Constitutional attorney and civil liberties expert John W. Whitehead, founder of The Rutherford Institute, warned LifeSiteNews.com earlier this year that political officials would long to use this seminal technology.
In an article for Wired.com today, philosopher Zoltan Istvan wrote that the notion first crossed his mind when he heard a blonde nurse say, “with 10,000 kids dying everyday around the world from starvation, you'd think we'd put birth control in the water.”
After careful thought, in an effort to “give hundreds of millions of future kids a better life, I cautiously endorse the idea of licensing parents,” Istvan wrote today.
The process, he said, “would be little different than getting a driver's license.” Parents must “pass a series of basic tests” in order to “get the green light to get pregnant and raise children.”
“Those applicants who are deemed unworthy” for a variety of reasons – he lists homelessness, criminal history, and poverty among his examples – “would not be allowed until they could demonstrate they were suitable parents.”
However, he questions how far governments would go to enforce its birth control mandate. “Would governments force abortion upon mothers if they were found to be pregnant without permission?” he asked, saying the idea seems “unimaginable in most societies around the world.”
Istvan writes that he finds “near-term hope” in a contraceptive technology funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, a remote-controlled injectable microchip that could effectively sterilize someone for up to 16 years.
“The implanted microchip lasts for up to 16 years -- three times current implantable devices, including IUDs -- and can deliver hormones into the body via an on-off switch on your mobile phone,” he wrote. “It's not a huge jump to imagine governments seeing opportunity in using this.”
However, due to the national government's spotty record on fiscal and other issues, he believes its control should be outsourced to a world government. “Perhaps a nonprofit entity like the World Health Organization might be able to step in,” he wrote, adding WHO's participation would inspire “more confidence.”
The concept of a birth licenses, even those run by the United Nations, is not new. Istvan noted the support of ethics professor Hugh LaFollette and Paul Ehrlich, author of The Population Bomb.
The Ehrlichs co-authored the 1977 book Ecoscience with current Obama Science Czar John Holdren. They endorsed a “comprehensive planetary regime” to control fertility, adding that “compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.” President Obama recently said he relies on Holdren to formulate his science policy.
The concept of government-regimented reproduction was also supported by Planned Parenthood founder Margaret Sanger some 80 years ago. Sanger wrote in a column for America Weekly in March 1934 that even then it may have “become necessary to establish a system of birth permits.”
Istvan believes new technology places their dream closer than ever to reality. Pre-clinical testing of the new microchip begins next year. A development team at the Massachusetts-based MicroCHIPS Inc. hopes to introduce the product by 2018, pending approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Scientists now admit many vaccines were made with cells from aborted babies

Posted on August 17, 2014 by Dr. Eowyn

This is a follow-up on a post I did in 2011, “Aborted Human Fetal Cells in Your Food, Vaccines & Cosmetics.”

After decades of ignoring the issue, scientists finally are acknowledging that many vaccines were made with cells from aborted fetuses babies.

We must ask ourselves about the morality of vaccines — whether the end justifies the means.

When we treat human beings, albeit very small human beings, as things — as mere means to our ends — we’ll soon discover that all human life is cheapened and objectified, including our own.

The dark story of immortality

Michael Cook | MercatorNet

After decades of ignoring the issue, Nature, the world’s leading science journal, has finally acknowledged that creating life-saving vaccines from tissue from aborted foetuses is a deeply controversial ethical issue.

In 1964, an American researcher obtained cells from a Swedish foetus aborted because her mother already had enough children. He coaxed them into multiplying into a cell line which he called WI-38. Since they were normal and healthy, they were ideal for creating vaccines. Two years later, scientists in the UK obtained cells from a 14-week male fetus aborted for “psychiatric reasons” from a 27-year-old British woman. This cell line is called MRC-5.

It is undeniable that the vaccines made from WI-38 and MRC-5 cells have saved millions of lives. Scientists have made vaccines against rubella, rabies, adenovirus, polio, measles, chickenpox and shingles, as well as smallpox, chicken pox and hepatitis A.

But protests by opponents of abortion have been largely ignored by the scientific community. If you Google “vaccines” and “abortion”, only Catholic groups, right-to-life organisations and sites warning about the dangers of vaccinations mention the topic. The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention barely alludes to it even though it has abundant information on vaccines. A website called Vaccine Ethics at the University of Pennsylvania Center for Bioethics fails to mention it.

The reason is clear: vaccines save lives and the abortions happened a long time ago. Get over it. Who cares? “At the time [the fetus] was obtained there was no issue in using discarded material. Retrospective ethics is easy but presumptuous,” says Stanley Plotkin, the American scientist who developed the rubella vaccine. “I am fond of saying that rubella vaccine has prevented thousands more abortions than have ever been prevented by Catholic religionists.”

But now even Nature – which supports abortion rights and reproductive technology – has expressed its misgivings. “More than 50 years after the WI-38 cell line was derived from a fetus, science and society [have] still to get to grips with the ethical issues of using human tissue in research,” its editorial declared in June.

What has changed?

If you could single out a reason, it would be the intensely moving 2010 best-seller, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot. This book has nothing to do with abortion, but it highlights the deep respect, almost sacredness, that the body of a human person must command, even something as insignificant as discarded tissue.

Henrietta Lacks was an African-American woman who was 31 when she died of cervical cancer in 1951. Cells from her tumour became the first human cells cultured continuously for use in research. HeLa cells have helped to make possible some of the most important medical advances of the past 60 years, including modern vaccines, cancer treatments, and IVF techniques. They are the most widely used human cell lines in existence. More than 300 scientific papers are published every month using HeLa cells.

There is no question about their usefulness – but were they obtained ethically? Is it ethical to continue using them?

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks raises disturbing questions which transcend “usefulness”. Henrietta Lacks was poor and black. Her children, it seems, are even poorer. A doctor at Johns Hopkins removed her cells without asking her. He cultivated the cells without informing her. He distributed the cells without asking permission of her family. Companies became rich by using her cells without paying royalties.Her family only learned that their mother’s cells had been scattered around the world in 1973. Their complaints were ignored for many years – after all, they were only poor, uneducated black folks.

No one cared about the woman called Henrietta Lacks who was overdosed with radium, who died leaving five children behind, one of them an epileptic housed in a filthy, chaotic institution called The Hospital for the Negro Insane. Some people even thought that HeLa cells originated with a woman named Helen Lane. Her daughter wrote in a diary, “When that day came, and my mother died, she was Robbed of her cells and John Hopkins Hospital learned of those cells and kept it to themselfs, and gave them to who they wanted and even changed the name to HeLa cell and kept it from us for 20+ years. They say Donated. No No No Robbed Self.”

It was only earlier this year that the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) negotiated an agreement with the family. All researchers who use or generate full genomic data from HeLa cells must now include in their publications an acknowledgement and expression of gratitude to the Lacks family.

Incredibly, despite all the publicity, scientists continued to ignore the concerns of the Lacks family. Just a few months ago, German researchers published the first sequence of the full HeLa genome. This compromised not only Henrietta Lacks’s genetic privacy but also her family’s. (The researchers have removed the sequence from public view.)

The story of HeLa cells, in short, is twofold: a story of towering scientific achievement and a story of exploitation by ambitious and callous scientists.

Less famous, but even more important, says Nature, have been WI-38 cells [from an aborted Swedish fetus baby]. HeLa cells multiply prolifically, but they are cancerous. WI-38 cells are healthy and normal and have been used to develop vaccines against rubella, rabies, adenovirus, polio, measles, chickenpox and shingles. Their origin is even more controversial than the dark story of Henrietta Lacks.

In 1962 a Swedish woman who was four months pregnant had a legal abortion because she did not want another child. The lungs of the foetus were removed and sent to Philadelphia. At the Wistar Institute for Anatomy and Biology they were minced up, processed and cultured by Leonard Hayflick. He had been culturing cells from aborted foetuses for years, even though abortion was technically illegal in Pennsylvania at the time, except for medical emergencies.

Leonard Hayflick examines WI-38 cells which were derived from an aborted Swedish girl.

After he successfully multiplied the WI-38 cells, Hayflick created more than 800 batches and distributed them freely around the world to drug companies and researchers. He eventually quarrelled with Wistar authorities because he thought that his contribution was being ignored. Without permission, he took all the remaining batches to California and his new job at Stanford. This led to years of bitter legal battles over who owned the cells. No one worried about where they had come from.

The abortion connection is beyond dispute, although, as Nature points out, “until now, that story has failed to reach the broad audience it deserves.” As in the Henrietta Lacks case, no informed consent was given by the Swedish mother. Her identity is known but she refuses to talk about the case. The doctors involved are all dead. A Swedish medical historian told Nature that in Sweden, “research material like tissues from aborted fetuses were available and used for research without consent or the knowledge of patients for a long time”, both before and after consent rules were tightened later in the 1960s.

The drug companies and institutions which have used WI-38 deny that there are serious ethical concerns either with the use of cells from aborted foetuses or with the lack of consent.

The institution which has examined this issue most closely is the Vatican. In 2005 it released a meticulously researched study of the ethical issues involved in using vaccines which had been developed with tissue from aborted foetuses. Even though it contended that parents could have their children vaccinated with a clear conscience, it did not dismiss the question as irrelevant or absurd. On the contrary, it concluded that “there is a grave responsibility to use alternative vaccines and to make a conscientious objection with regard to those which have moral problems.”

And it said that the existing situation was completely unjust. “Parents… are forced to choose to act against their conscience or otherwise, to put the health of their children and of the population as a whole at risk. This is an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.”

What is the way forward?

I am writing from suburban Sydney which long ago lost its connection to the Aboriginal tribes who once lived here. Yet at every civic ceremony we acknowledge the memory of the Cammeraygal and Wallumedegal peoples. It is a form of reparation for the dispossession, disease and death which carried them away, leaving neither names nor descendants.

Doesn’t the story of Henrietta Lacks suggest that drug companies should do something similar with their vaccine products? From now on, the NIH says, scientists who use HeLa cells must include “an acknowledgment and expression of gratitude to the Lacks family for their contributions”.

Why shouldn’t drug companies and researchers who use the WI-38 (or the MRC-5 cells) do the same? “This vaccine was developed with the cells of a Swedish child who was aborted in 1964. We are grateful for her contribution and grieve at her absence.”

H/t California Catholic Daily

To find which vaccines are morally acceptable go to Children Of God For Life.

See also:

• HPV vaccines have infertility side-effects
• China makes “medicinal” pills from aborted babies
• Made in China: Aborted babies soup
• Roe v. Wade Spawned New Industry
• Bill Gates funds contraceptive/abortion microchip that’s remote controlled

~Eowyn

Order Out Of Chaos: The Doctrine That Runs The World

truther  

“From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.”

- Winston Churchill, February 1920, in an article that appeared in the Illustrated Sunday Herald

The concept of conspiracy frightens some people, so much so that they are willing to overlook any and all evidence that world events are for the most part directed, rather than chaotic and coincidental. For those who are uneducated and unaware, explanations for the terrible tides of politics and war generally revolve around a false understanding of Occam’s razor. They argue that the theory states that the “simplest explanation” is usually the correct one for any particular problem or crisis. But Occam’s razor actually states that the simplest explanation according to the evidence at hand is usually the correct answer for any given problem. That is to say, the simplest explanation must conform to the evidence, or it is likely not correct.

Unfortunately, “skeptics” of directed conspiracy often turn a blind eye to evidence that is contrary to their simple explanations, while arguing that simplification is its own vindication. In other words, they don’t feel the need to defend their simplistic world view because, in their minds, simplicity stands on its own as self-evident. There was a time when men believed that the planets revolved around each other because they were tied together by long glass strings, and this was evident to them because it was the simplest explanation they could come up with. The thinking of skeptics of the New World Order and concerted globalization is much like this.

The most common argument they tend to exploit is that the world is far too “chaotic” and that if the elites are actually seeking a fully centralized one-world system, they are “failing miserably” because so many cultures are so clearly divided. For anyone who holds this argument as logical or practical, first I would suggest they look beyond the surface of the various conflicts at the similarities between these so called “enemies.”

For example, what about the United States versus Russia? These two nations have a long history of opposing ideologies and have come close to war time and time again. Certainly, average Americans see themselves as individualists and Russians as socialist or communist. Average Russians see Americans as capitalist imperialists and see themselves as humanists. But what about their respective governments? What about their respective financiers and oligarchs? Do they really see each other as enemies?

If that were so, then why did American Wall Street tycoons and the U.S. military aid the Bolshevik Revolution in 1917?

Wall Street Funded the Bolshevik Revolution - Professor Antony Sutton

A false paradigm was created when internationalists supported the Bolshevik Revolution and allowed Russia to become a communist-held country. The eventual Cold War that resulted created the rationale used by the military-industrial complex to build a massive standing army (which is not part of the U.S. Constitution), an army which could then be sent around the world to subdue various nations and even possibly be used to oppress the American people.

Even today, the false East/West paradigm continues, with America painted as the bumbling villain and Russia painted as the stalwart and reasonable objector. Yet Russia’s top government officials and our top government officials work closely with and answer to the same international financiers and elites, like the International Monetary Fund and the Bank of International Settlements, as I outlined in great detail in False East/West Paradigm Hides The Rise Of Global Currency and Russia Is Dominated By Global Banks, Too.

Even closer to current events, the U.S. has now entered into military operations against ISIS insurgents moving rapidly through Iraq’s northern regions toward Baghdad. However, if ISIS is the enemy, why did the U.S. and our ally, Saudi Arabia, support and train ISIS agents in Syria as well as Iraq?

Is it just irony that our government helped birth ISIS and now the White House is at war with the group? Or is it possible that maybe, just maybe, a greater plan is afoot?

As the sinister Rahm Emanuel famously said: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

If a crisis of opportunity does not present itself in the time frame you need, why not ENGINEER a crisis to fit your goals? This is a tactic that has been used by elites for generations, and it is called the Hegelian dialectic.

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel’s work was the very foundation of the collectivist/socialist ideology, and it inspired Karl Marx during his writing of The Communist Manifesto. Hegel was an avid statist who believed that the collective must be ruled and directed by centralized governance and that all individualism should be sacrificed for the greater good.

Hegel wrote that the state “has supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the State… for the right of the world spirit is above all special privileges.”

In his dialectic theory, Hegel conjured a strategy by which the establishment elites could control the masses through deliberately created division. To define the Hegelian dialectic method simply, the ruling body must first trigger a problem or crisis that causes the citizenry to react with fear and demand a solution. The rulers then offer a solution, which they had already predetermined before they had started the crisis; this solution would usually entail more power for the elites and less freedom for the citizens.

The world appears divided and chaotic exactly because it has been MADE that way by a select few in the globalist establishment. In fact, if you were to name any war in the past 100 years, any competent alternative analyst would easily produce undeniable evidence of the involvement of international banks and think tanks pulling strings on both sides.

If you don’t understand the concept of “order out of chaos,” then you’ll never understand a thing.

Engineered chaos serves several purposes. It provides distraction and cover for the elites to implement other plans that they would rather not have noticed.

It also provides a scapegoat for the masses, who are now divided against each other. When violent changes are implemented that produce destructive consequences, the people must be placated with an easily identifiable villain. Certain changes globalists wish to make in the way the world functions require the careful exploitation of scapegoats.

For example, the globalists at the IMF have been discussing the establishment of a global basket currency for years to replace the U.S. dollar.

Russia and the East have also, conveniently, been calling for the IMF to replace the dollar with their Special Drawing Rights basket.

And finally, as well as conveniently, the elites in the U.S. government have launched a controlled coup in Ukraine and initiated direct economic confrontation with Russia, thereby giving the East the perfect excuse to dump the U.S. dollar as world reserve and replace it with a basket currency system under the IMF. Despite claims that Vladimir Putin is “anti-globalist,” the Russian is in fact an avid supporter of the IMF, and has stated his goal is to continue Russia’s IMF membership in a larger capacity:

“In the BRICS case we see a whole set of coinciding strategic interests. First of all, this is the common intention to reform the international monetary and financial system. In the present form it is unjust to the BRICS countries and to new economies in general. We should take a more active part in the IMF and the World Bank’s decision-making system. The international monetary system itself depends a lot on the US dollar, or, to be precise, on the monetary and financial policy of the US authorities. The BRICS countries want to change this.”

Yes, Vladimir, and so do the manipulative social engineers at the IMF…

Hopefully, you have the sense to see how this works: problem, reaction, solution. Economic or physical war is launched between East and West, while the dollar is killed in the process. The masses react by demanding a fair and balanced replacement for the dollar as world reserve so that economic stability can return. The Americans blame Russia and the East for their fiscal misfortune. The East blames the hubris of the West for its own downfall. Neither side blames the banksters, who started the whole calamity to begin with. And the elites swoop in as saviors with a new Bretton Woods-style agreement to appease all sides and cement their global currency system, the system they had always wanted. And with a global economic currency and authority in place, global governance is not far behind — order out of chaos.

This process is more psychological than political in its goals. One could argue that if the elites already have control of all central banks and governments, then why do they need a global government? The answer is that these men do not want secret global governance, they want open global governance. They want us to ACCEPT the idea as a fact of existence, for only when we agree to participate in the lie will they then have truly won.

The end result of World War I was the creation of the League of Nations and the argument that sovereignty leads to disunion and catastrophe. World War II led to the creation of the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund. I believe that a third world war is nearly upon us, one that may involve weapons of monetary destruction more so than weapons of mass destruction. Each supposed disintegration of global unity has eventually led to greater centralization, and this is something the skeptics seem to forget. The progression of crises suggests that the next war will lead to total globalization under the dominance of a minority of elitists posing as “wise men” who only wish to bring peace and harmony to the masses. In the meantime, the skeptics will continue to mindlessly debate in the face of all reason that the whole thing was a fluke, an act of random mathematical chance, leading coincidentally to the one thing the establishment rulers crave: total global totalitarian micromanagement.