Saturday, August 9, 2014

Disastrous Financial State of American Households. Result of Unemployment, Low Wages   ~ so what's the plan ,folks? just gonna wait UNTIL it's ALLLLL ...pissed away ,huh  that it !

Federal Reserve study


insolvency
A typical American household cannot raise $400 without borrowing money or selling possessions, according to the results of a survey published Friday by the Federal Reserve, the US central bank. The Fed’s Report on the Economic Well-Being of U.S. Households in 2013 points to the precarious state of the majority of US households, who risk poverty or bankruptcy in the event of job loss, accident or unforeseen medical expense.
According to the report, nearly two-thirds of those under 45 did not have funds set aside to cover their expenses for a three-month period.
The survey helps expose the fictitious character of the economic “recovery,” which has supposedly been going on for five years. Seventy percent of respondents said they were no better off than they were in 2008, during the depth of the worst downturn since the Great Depression. From this the report draws the extraordinarily understated conclusion that the recovery has been “uneven.”
When asked how they would pay for an “emergency expense” that cost $400, less than 40 percent said they could pay for it with funds currently available in a checking or savings account. Nineteen percent of respondents said they would be entirely unable to cover the expense; 9 percent said they would have to sell something; and 12 percent said they would have to get a loan from friends or family, while the rest would put it on a credit card.
One quarter of the population holds student loan debt, according to the survey, averaging $27,840. Eighteen percent of those who owe on student loans said they were either behind on their payments or had gone into collection. Another 34 percent indicated that “they had one or more loans in deferment or forbearance.” More than half of the respondents with student loans, in other words, had difficulty making payments on them, or were unable to.
Fifty-four percent of survey respondents who took out student loans for their own education were forced to cut back on spending to pay them, and a remarkable 56 percent said they “believe that the costs of the education outweighed any financial benefits they received from the education.”
Additionally, more than a third of survey respondents said they had put off medical care over the previous months because they were unable to afford it.
The report presents a picture of a society in which wide layers of the population have low incomes and, as a result, little access to credit. Of survey participants who had applied for credit in the previous year, one-third were turned down or given less credit than they requested. Twenty-six percent of survey participants said they had put off applying for some form of credit “because they thought they would be turned down.”
Renters, who make up about one-third of the households surveyed, were asked to give their reasons for renting rather than owning their home. The most common responses were that “they can’t afford a down payment to buy a home (45 percent), can’t qualify for a mortgage (29 percent), find it more convenient to rent (24 percent), or find it cheaper to rent than own (23 percent).” Young renters, those 18 to 29, were far more likely to indicate they couldn’t afford a down payment on a house.
The report found that Americans—through no fault of their own, of course—were largely unprepared for retirement. “Almost half of respondents had not planned financially for retirement, with 24 percent saying they had given only a little thought to financial planning for their retirement and another 25 percent saying they had done no planning at all,” the report concludes. Thirty-one percent reported they had no retirement savings or pension, “including 19 percent of those ages 55 to 64, and 25 percent didn’t know how they will pay their expenses in retirement.”
Of the two-thirds of households who had savings in 2008, a quarter reported using up “some” or “nearly all” of their savings “to pay for bills and expenses.”
The disastrous condition of household finances is an expression of the continued prevalence of mass unemployment and the expansion of low-wage labor. The share of the US population that is employed remains at 59 percent, down from nearly 65 percent at the beginning of 2000.
In April, the National Employment Law Project reported that since the financial crash of 2008, 1.9 million high- and average-paying jobs in the private sector have been eliminated and replaced with some 1.8 million low-wage jobs. Partly as a result, real median household income fell from $55,600 in 2007 to $51,017 in 2012—a decrease of nearly ten percent in just five years. All of this has taken place as the wealth of the super-rich has more than doubled since 2008.
The disastrous condition of US households is the result of the deliberate policies of the Obama administration, which has provided the banks and financial corporations with trillions of dollars in free cash, while encouraging companies to slash wages and offering no meaningful assistance to homeowners or student loan borrowers in distress.

Washington Threatens The World


AMERICADEM
The consequence of Washington’s reckless and irresponsible political and military interventions in Iraq, Libya, and Syria has been to unleash evil. The various sects that lived in peace under the rule of Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi, and Assad are butchering one another, and a new group, ISIS, is in the process of creating a new state out of parts of Iraq and Syria. 
The turmoil brought into the Middle East by the  Bush and Obama regimes has meant death and displacement for millions and untold future deaths.  As I write 40,000 Iraqis are stranded on a mountain top without water awaiting death at the hands of ISIS, a creation of US meddling.
The reality in the Middle East stands in vast contradiction to the stage managed landing of George W. Bush on the US aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln where Bush declared “Mission Accomplished” on May 1, 2003.  The mission that Washington accomplished was to wreck the Middle East and the lives of millions of people and to destroy America’s reputation in the process. Thanks to the demonic neoconservative Bush regime, today America is regarded by the rest of the world as the greatest threat to world peace.
The Clinton regime’s attack on Serbia set the pattern.  Bush upped the ante with Washington’s naked aggression against Afghanistan, which Washington clothed in Orwellian language–”Operation Enduring Freedom.”
Washington brought ruin, not freedom, to Afghanistan. After 13 years of blowing up the country, Washington is now withdrawing, the “superpower” having been defeated by a few thousand lightly armed Taliban, but leaving a wasteland behind for which Washington will accept no responsibility.
Another source of endless Middle East turmoil is Israel whose theft of Palestine is Washington-enabled.  In the middle of Israel’s latest attack on civilians in Gaza, the US Congress passed resolutions in support of Israel’s war crimes and voted hundreds of millions of dollars to pay for Israel’s ammunition. Here we witness Great Moral America 100 percent in support of unambiguous  war crimes against essentially defenseless people.
When Israel murders women and children, Washington calls it “Israel’s right to defend their own country”–a country that Israel stole from Palestinians–but when Palestinians retaliate Washington calls it “terrorism.”  By supporting Israel, declared to be a terrorist state by a few moral governments that still exist, and accused of war crimes by the UN General Secretary, Washington is in violation of its own laws against supporting terrorist states.
Of course, Washington itself is the leading terrorist state. Therefore, it is illegal under US law for Washington to support itself.  Washington, however, does not accept law, neither domestic nor international, as a constraint on its actions. Washington is “exceptional, indispensable.”  No one else counts. No law, no Constitution, and no humane consideration has authority to constrain Washington’s will. In its claims Washington surpasses those of the Third Reich.
As horrific as Washington’s recklessness toward the Middle East is, Washington’s recklessness toward Russia is many orders of magnitude greater.  Washington has convinced nuclear armed Russia that Washington is planning a nuclear first strike.
In response Russia is beefing up its nuclear forces and testing US air defense. reactions.
It is difficult to imagine a more irresponsible act than to convince Russia that Washington intends to hit Russia with a preemptive first strike. One of Putin’s advisers has explained to the Russian media Washington’s first strike intentions, and a member of the Russian Duma has made a documented presentation of Washington’s first strike intentions. http://financearmageddon.blogspot.co.uk/2014/07/official-warning-u-s-to-hit-russia-with.html   By marshaling the evidence, I have pointed out in my columns that it is impossible for Russia to avoid this conclusion.
China is aware that China faces the same threat from Washington.
China’s response to Washington’s war plans against China was to demonstrate how China’s nuclear forces would be used in response to Washington’s attack on China to destroy the US.  China made this public, hoping to create opposition among Americans to Washington’s war plans against China.   Like Russia, China is a rising country that does not need war in order to succeed.
The only country on earth that needs war is Washington, and that is because Washington’s goal is the neoconservative one of exercising hegemony over the world.
Prior to the Bush and Obama regimes, every previous US president went to great efforts to avoid telegraphing any nuclear threat. US war doctrine was careful to keep
nuclear weapons limited to retaliation in the event the US suffered a nuclear attack.
The purpose of nuclear forces was to prevent the use of such weapons.  The reckless George W. Bush regime elevated nuclear weapons to preemptive first use, thus destroying the constraint placed on the use of nuclear weapons.
The overriding purpose of the Reagan administration was to end the cold war and, thereby, the threat of nuclear war.  The George W. Bush regime, together with the Obama regime’s demonization of Russia, have overturned President Reagan’s unique achievement and made nuclear war likely.
When the incompetent Obama regime decided to overthrow the democratically elected government in Ukraine and install a puppet government of Washington’s choosing, the Obama State Department, run by neoconservative ideologues,  forgot that the eastern and southern portions of Ukraine consist of former Russian provinces that were attached to the Ukraine Soviet Socialist Republic by Communist Party leaders when Ukraine and Russia were part of the same country–the Soviet Union.  When the Russophobic stooges that Washington installed in Kiev demonstrated in word and deed their hostility to Ukraine’s Russian population, the former Russian provinces declared their desire to return to mother Russia. This is not surprising, nor is it something that can be blamed on Russia.
Crimea succeeded in returning to Russia, where Crimea resided since the 1700s, but Putin, hoping to defuse the propaganda war that Washington was mounting against him did not accept the pleas from the other former Russian provinces. Consequently, Washington’s stooges in Kiev felt free to attack the protesting provinces and have been following the Israeli policy of attacking civilian populations, civilian residences, and civilian infrastructure.
The presstitute Western media ignored the facts and accused Russia of invading and annexing parts of Ukraine. This lie is comparable to the lies that US Secretary of State Colin Powell told the UN about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction in behalf of the criminal Bush regime, lies that Colin Powell later apologized for to no avail as Iraq had been destroyed by his lies.
When the Malaysian airliner was destroyed, before any facts were known Russia was blamed. The British media was especially primed to blame Russia almost the instant it was known the airliner was downed.  I heard the BBC’s gross misrepresentation and blatant lies on American National Public Radio, and only the Daily Mail’s propagandistic account was worse. The entire “news” event has the appearance of orchestration prior to the event, which, of course, suggests that Washington was behind it.
The airliner deaths became all important for Washington’s propaganda war. The 290 casualties are unfortunate, but they are a small fraction of the deaths that Israel was inflicting on Palestinians at the same moment without provoking any protests from Western governments, as distinct from Western peoples in the streets, people whose protests were conveniently suppressed for Israel by Western security forces.
Washington used the downing of the airliner, which probably was Washington’s responsibility,  as an excuse for another round of sanctions and to pressure its European puppets to join the sanctions with sanctions of their own, which Washington’s EU puppets did.
Washington relies on accusations and insinuations and refuses to release the evidence from the satellite photos, because the photos do not support Washington’s lies.  Facts
are not permitted to interfere with Washington’s demonization of Russia any more than facts interfered with Washington’s demonization of Iraq, Libya, Syria, and Iran.
Twenty-two reckless and irresponsible US senators have introduced the “Russian Aggression Prevention Act of 2014,”  US Senate bill 2277, sponsored by Senator Bob Corker, who well represents in his ignorance and stupidity what appears to be the majority of the American population or the majority of voters in the state of Tennessee.  Corker’s bill is a mindless piece of legislation designed to start a war that would be likely to leave no survivors.  Apparently, idiotic Americans will elect any fool to power.
The belief that Russia is responsible for the downed Malaysian airliner has become fact in Western capitals despite the total absence of even a tiny scrap of evidence in behalf of the claim. Moreover, even it the accusation were true, is one airliner worth a World War?
The UK Defense Committee has concluded that a broke and militarily impotent UK must “focus on the defense of Europe against Russia.”  The military spending drums, if not the war drums, are beating and the entire West has joined in. A militarily impotent Britain is going to defend Europe from a non-existent, although much proclaimed, attack from the Russian bear.
US and NATO military dignitaries and the Pentagon chief are issuing Russia Threat Warnings based on alleged but non-existent Russian troop-buildups on Ukraine’s border.  According to the the Western Ministry of Propaganda if Russia defends the Russian populations in Ukraine from military attack from Washington’s stooge government in Kiev, it is proof that Russia is the villain.
Washington’s propaganda campaign has succeeded in turning Russia into a threat. Polls show that 69 percent of Americans now regard Russia as a threat, and that the confidence of Russians in American leadership has vanished.
Russians and their government observe the identical demonization of their country and their leader as they observed of Iraq and Saddam Hussein, of Libya and Gaddafi, of Syria and Assad, and of Afghanistan and the Taliban just prior to military assaults on these countries by the West.  For a Russian, the safest conclusion from the evidence is that Washington intends war on Russia.
It is my opinion that the irresponsibility and recklessness of the Obama regime is without precedent.  Never before has the United States government or the government of any nuclear power gone to such great efforts to convince another nuclear power that that power was being set up for attack.  It is difficult to imagine a more provocative act that more endangers life on earth.  Indeed, the White House Fool has doubled up, convincing both Russia and China that Washington is planning a preemptive first strike on both.
Republicans want to sue or to impeach Obama over relatively inconsequential issues, such as ObamaCare.  Why don’t Republicans want to impeach Obama over such a critical issue as subjecting the world to the risk of nuclear armageddon?
The answer is that the Republicans are as crazed as the Democrats.  Their leaders, such as John McCain and Lindsay Graham, are determined that “we stand up to the Russians!”  Wherever one looks in American politics one sees crazed people, psychopaths and sociopaths who should not be in political office.
Washington long ago gave up diplomacy.  Washington relies on force and intimidation.  The US government is utterly devoid of judgment.  This is why polls show that the rest of the world regards the US government as the greatest threat to world peace.  Today
(August 8, 2014) Handelsblatt, Germany’s Wall Street Journal, wrote in a signed editorial by the publisher:
“The American tendency to move from verbal escalation to military escalation–the isolation, demonization, and attacking of enemies–has not proven effective. The last successful major military action the US conducted was the Normandy landing [in 1944]. Everything else – Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghanistan – was a clear failure. Moving NATO units towards the Polish border with Russia and thinking about arming Ukraine is a continuation of relying on military means in the absence of diplomacy.”
Washington’s puppet states–all of Europe, Japan, Canada, and Australia–enable Washington’s unrivaled danger to the world by their support of Washington’s agenda of exercising hegemony over the entire world.
The 100th anniversary of World War I is upon us.  And the folly that caused this war is being repeated.  WWI destroyed a civilized Western world, and it was the work of a mere handful of scheming people. The result was Lenin, the Soviet Union, Hitler, the rise of American Imperialism, Korea, Vietnam, the military interventions that created ISIS, and now resurrected conflict between Washington and Russia that President Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev had ended.
As Stephen Starr has pointed out on my website, if merely 10% of the nuclear weapons in the US and Russian arsenals are used, life on earth terminates.
Dear readers, ask yourselves, when has Washington told you anything that was not a lie?  Washington’s lies have caused millions of casualties.  Do you want to be a casualty of Washington’s lies?
Do you believe that Washington’s lies and propaganda about the Malaysian airliner and Ukraine are worth risking life on earth?  Who is so gullible that he cannot recognize that Washington’s lies about Ukraine are like Washington’s lies about Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction, Iranian nukes, and Assad’s use of chemical weapons? 
Do you think that the neoconservative influence that prevails in Washington, regardless of the political party in office, is too dangerous to be tolerated?

MH17: Conspiracy, Putin and World War 3

Stuart J. Hooper
21st Century Wire
PLANES
By all accounts, it appears that Malaysian Airlines flight MH17 was indeed shot down over Eastern Ukraine on July 17th.

With all 295 passengers and crew dead, this is an immense tragedy that has struck at the hearts of people across the world. This event has unfolded in a region that is already dealing with numerous issues, meaning for the very real possibility of extremely negative complications.
Audio presentation of this essay can be found here:

MH17 Conspiracy, Putin and World War 3



Eastern Ukraine has suffered intense fighting over the past few months as pro-Russian forces, primarily located in the East, have declared independent regions, as in Donetsk, while forces from Kiev look to regain control. Earlier in the day of Thursday 17th July, the same day as the attack on MH17, Ukraine’s government in Kiev accused Russia of shooting down a Ukrainian Su-25 fighter jet. The government stated, Military aircraft of the Russian Federation carried out a rocket attack on a Su-25 plane of the armed forces of Ukraine, which was on a mission in Ukraine”. Although, there is still ‘no proof of active engagement’ from Russian forces in Ukraine, meaning that this accusation cannot be proved (NY Times). These messages of animosity towards Russia continued on into the day after the MH17 disaster had occurred, as Kiev immediately laid blame upon the pro-Russian ‘separatist’ forces in the East. These accusations were immediately countered, as the rebel forces stated that they lacked the missile systems needed to shoot down an aircraft at the altitude MH17 was flying at; some 33,000 feet.
Such accusations have not been echoed by any other government at the time of writing, with the U.S and UK in particular offering only condolences and calls for an investigation. This is an exceptionally important detail of the post-crisis developments, because usually after such an incident governments, especially Western governments, will look to present the perpetrator to the public as soon as possible to stem rampant speculation. The fact that this hasn’t happened represents the true severity of what has occurred. This successful attack on a civilian aircraft, in such a volatile region, has the possibility to ignite a fuse of destruction that can only be started in very few areas of the world. This, quite literal, fuse extends to the thousands of nuclear missiles waiting to be launched on the Russian side of the Eastern Ukrainian border. The possibility for the use of tactical nuclear weapons has never been higher.
Putin pointed the finger at Kiev, albeit somewhat lightly, on Thursday evening, stating that if the government had not continued military operations in the East then the disaster would never have happened. Interestingly, it has been reported that Kiev deployed a Buk anti-aircraft missile system to Donetsk on Wednesday 16th July. Accusations that this system was used to shoot down MH17 have been voiced, so perhaps Putin is correct in suggesting that this continuation of the conflict is to blame for the tragedy. To further support the claim that a Buk system shot down MH17, the Russian Defence Ministry issued a statement on 18th July saying that “Russian equipment detected throughout July 17 the activity of a Kupol radar, deployed as part of a Buk-M1 battery near Styla [a village some 30km south of Donetsk]”.  This is in direct contradiction to statements from Kiev, which said that no Buk systems were deployed anywhere in the region. Could Ukrainian forces have accidently shot down MH17, thinking it was some kind of transport aircraft supporting anti-Kiev forces? If this official Russian statement on the Buk deployment is correct, then this could certainly be a very real possibility. But, on the other hand, we must remember that simply having capability does not prove guilt.
However, the idea that this was a case of mistaken identity has an incredibly frightening piece of supporting evidence. Russia Today posted an article, which almost immediately went viral, detailing a statement that suggested Putin’s presidential aircraft was the actual target of this attack. The anonymous source said, “I can say that Putin’s plane and the Malaysian Boeing intersected at the same point and the same echelon. That was close to Warsaw on 330-m echelon at the height of 10,100 meters. The presidential jet was there at 16:21 Moscow time and the Malaysian aircraft – 15:44 Moscow time”. Images of both the presidential IL-96 and Boeing-777 reveal that the two aircraft are astoundingly similar in both physical shape and aesthetic design. A source from the terminal in which Putin’s plane is based has suggested that the IL-96 has avoided Ukrainian airspace for some time, but no official word confirming or denying either of these stories has emerged. If it is confirmed, the world has just been witness to one of the most outrageous assassination attempts of all time.
The centre of the case against the pro-Russian rebels hinged upon the discovery of a tape that had ‘leaked’ online, allegedly detailing a conversation about the destruction of MH17. It has recently come to light that said tape is nothing more than a manufactured fraud. Analysis has revealed that the audio file is compiled of numerous clips spliced together, in an attempt to lay blame upon the rebels in the East. The report, which can be found below, states that the rebels are actually discussing an earlier plane crash and that whoever created this audio file had very little time to perfect it. We cannot allow such a fraud to be used as evidence in the push for a wider war.
Putin has been a thorn in the side of not only Ukraine, but the majority of the Western world, for the entirety of his time in office. Thwarting Western plans has been an almost daily calling for Russia’s president, as Putin prevented the West from attacking Syria, by organising a diplomatic solution to the chemical weapons problem, and halted plans to overthrow Ukraine and bring it under NATO by diplomatically annexing Crimea. Putin’s presidential jet was returning from Fortaleza, Brazil, where he and other leaders of the BRICS nations had agreed to the creation of a $100Billion development bank, which will offer a true counterweight to Western financial dominance that it has been exerting via the World Bank and IMF. This new force from the BRICS might be seen as the tipping point into a new level of hatred for Putin, as Western hegemonic, financial dominance can now finally be challenged. Thus, one need not look far to find a motive for any potential assassination of the Russian president.
The West has gone all-in on supporting Kiev under Poroshenko. The son of U.S. Vice President Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, was recently appointed to the board of directors of a major Ukrainian gas company, which happens to have prospects in the contested Eastern regions where MH17 was lost. Such a flagrant display of oligarchical tendencies caused such an outrage that the Whitehouse had to issue a statement suggesting that ‘“the vice-president does not endorse any particular company and has no involvement with this company”. This move, into Ukrainian natural resources, shows that the oligarchy, steering Western hegemonic power, is not going to easily back down when it comes to Ukraine. The loss of MH17 only strengthens the West’s position if it attempts to blame pro-Russian rebels in the East. While governments have not, at least yet, entirely agreed with Kiev’s accusations against Russia regarding MH17, the corporate media is doing its best to push that line of thought. The most outrageous, and truly unsubstantiated, headline was brought to us by British tabloid The Sun, which stated: ‘FLIGHT MH17 SHOT OUT OF SKY’, with the following directly below it: ‘PUTIN’S MISSILE’. When you put it all together you will read the slightly disjointed sentence, ‘flight MH17 shot out of sky Putin’s missile’, which cleverly, and legally, covers the tabloid. Had the front page included the word ‘by’, a strong, and undoubtedly winning, legal challenge from the Russian government would be coming The Sun’s way. This disingenuous and illusive front page will have undoubtedly mislead thousands, if not millions, of readers, as it attempted to lay the foundations required, in the minds of the general public, for the full-scale anti-Russian propaganda campaign that we are now bearing witness to in the West.
Unimaginable, is the only way to describe what might be occurring right now if Putin had have been on board that plane. The lack of any strong accusations from the U.S. and UK reflect this horrific, and potentially narrowly avoided, possibility. But what must be stressed is that 295 innocent people lost their lives today in an act of unthinkable barbarity. The world, but not necessarily governments, must send a hard, unified and immediate response that the targeting of civilian aircraft will never be tolerated. But, this incident must also not be allowed to trigger World War Three. Such a statement is not mere hyperbole, as the analysis above has examined, and should serve as a stark warning on the immense severity of this situation. Do not allow the media, politicians, or anyone else, to use this incident to justify actions that will have truly world altering consequences. Also, be sure to ignore disinformation (as some crackpot is already spreading regarding this incident and zombies, yes zombies) and inconsequential ‘information’, because numerology isn’t studied on any political science or international relations course in the world. Make use of social media to remind people that we do not know that it was ‘Putin’s Missile’ and take a stand against the propagandists. While an unthinkable tragedy, the loss of MH17 is not worth World War Three. So let’s not go there.
Stuart J. Hooper
Essential Sources:
ITAR-TASS
Kiev’s evidence of militia’s responsibility for airliner crash faked – experthttp://en.itar-tass.com/russia/741521
Ukraine’s anti-aircraft missile system dispatched to Donetsk Wednesdayhttp://en.itar-tass.com/world/741173
New York Times
Russia Today
BRICS establish $100bn bank and currency pool to cut out Western dominancehttp://rt.com/business/173008-brics-bank-currency-pool/
Reports that Putin flew similar route as MH17, presidential airport says ‘hasn’t overflown Ukraine for long time’http://rt.com/news/173672-malaysia-plane-crash-putin/
Son of US VP Joe Biden appointed to board of major Ukrainian gas companyhttp://rt.com/business/158660-biden-son-ukraine-company/
Ukrainian Buk battery radar was operational when Malaysian plane downed – Moscowhttp://rt.com/news/173784-ukraine-plane-malaysian-russia/
White House: No ethical issues with Veep’s son joining Ukraine gas gianthttp://rt.com/news/158800-us-biden-ukraine-gas/
The Sun
Friday, July 18, 2014Print Edition

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978) as Cryptocracy Allegory

Invasion of the "space flowers."
Invasion of the “space flowers.”
By: Jay  //https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkK2JJr1ia4
I was tempted to write this as a joke analysis under the name “VibrantCitizen,” but I’ll refrain, since the competition likes to “borrow” ideas without returning them.  Directed by Philip Kaufman, Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978) is a sci fi classic, but how many classics feature a beta-turned-alpha Donald Sutherland pulling his afro game on a brunette? Very few.  Some readers will balk at my attempt to take this film too seriously, but I intend to make a weighty case for it.  Gather round dear younglings, padawans and gelflings, and let me show you the deep arcana of my patented, cookie-cutter style of esoteric film analysis.
We are all familiar with They Live! as a classic of conspiriana, but as of yet, Invasion of the Body Snatchers has not had its deserved treatment.  An online search of Invasion reveals the standard wacko forum fare with little insight to be gained.  Undoubtedly, are some subtle ideas to explore here, as the successful 1978 remake has elements the original film does not.  As proposed at JaysAnalysis long ago, the usage of “aliens” in most significant esoteric films is symbolic of the cryptocracy, the occult, technocractic and financial elite that rule our present world order.  From the vantage of the highly functioning psychopath or radical eugenicist/bio-ethicist, the loss of emotion and free will, and its replacement with calculated, quantitatively-obsessed robot logic is the only rational and inevitable course for our technocracy-bound world.  The alien invaders in the film who desire fully brainwashed and standardized massed are therefore an accurate representation of these so-called elite.  The endgame of the aliens and the cryptocracy are thus strangely parallel.
In the storyline, San Fancisco Health Department worker Elizabeth Driscoll discovers that her normal, boring boyfriend suddenly loses his (very thin) personality, becoming some kind of puffy tie-wearing Republican drone.  Her boss, Matthew Bennell (played by Donald Sutherland), is eventually convinced that some strange phenomenon is causing people to lose all sense of emotion and rational, individual thought, as more and more acquaintances become overnight drones.  San Francisco rapidly and appropriately succumbs to the trendy collectivist takeover  by the alien biological attack, wherein the alien life-form grows into a pod, and somehow lulls unwary pod bystanders to sleep, replicating the sleeper into a new, hive-mind clone.  As Elizabeth puts the pieces together, she declares several times, “It’s a conspiracy.  It’s a conspiracy.”
Monsanto brand Hobos.
Monsanto brand Hobos.
For a film like Invasion, I think it’s sufficient to hit the highlights: One of the more ridiculous being a vagabond banjo player with a pet dog who passes out near a pod.  The result of the slumber produces a Monsanto brand genetically-modified hobo, cross-species engineered into a dog-man.  The relevance being not only are the “aliens” drugging the populace, placing them into an induced comatose state, mind controlling and cloning them, but the invaders are also creating genetic hybrids.  Meanwhile, the literary and intelligentsia society circles of Elizabeth and Matthew, a psychiatrist Dr. David Kibner (Leonard Nimoy) and author Jack Bellicec (Jeff Goldblum), are intent on fervently explaining away any notion of conspiracy as absurd.  Every possible theory is accepted as more rational than what is actually happening – an insight even more relevant in our own day, as the so-called intelligentsia and academia of our day in their self-willed cognitive dissonance cannot fathom the thesis that an analogue of Invasion of the Body Snatchers is actually happening!  How often have we heard from friends and family that the development of eugenics into bio-engineering and genetic manipulation is not a problem?  How often have we seen Monsanto and the promotion of GMO as “harmless”?  So-called intelligentsia member Neil deGrasse Tyson even recently defended GMOs as harmless, saying critics need to “chill,” just like Dr. Kibner in the film.
Velikovsky's "Worlds in Collision."
Velikovsky’s “Worlds in Collision.”
As the invasion’s bio-attack spreads, our lead characters oddly meet up in a mud bath, where they spot their first in-process, slime-coated clone.  Nancy Bellicec (Veronica Cartwright), Jack’s wife, who runs the mud bath, and has a crucial, brief dialogue with a soon-to-be cloned patron about two important books that are a key to understanding the esoteric underpinning of the film: Worlds in Collision, by Immanuel Velikovsky, and Star Maker, by Olaf Stapledon.  These two books are clues – while on the surface, this is a standard-fare sci fi/horror film, yet underlying the cheese is a profoundly occult message.  Jewish psychoanalyst Immanuel Velikovsky is famous for his alternative theory of cosmology and cosmogony, known as “catastrophism,” where ancient mythology and its representational assigning of the gods to specific planets actually plays a role in reconstructing primal history and human origins.

Velikovsky was lambasted by both modern science and his contemporaries, but whatever his flaws, my suspicion is that he was rejected for three reasons: He utilized the Bible as a document that reported actual historical events, was critical of carbon dating, and held to an electromagnetic view of the universe, as opposed to Newtonian atomistic ideas.  The slightest hint of any of those three ideas is enough to be rejected wholesale by modern “science,” which makes Velikovsky all the more interesting and worth considering, in my estimation. The Velikovsky archive can be found here.  This is not a full endorsement on my part, but that the ideas are worth examination, due to the incoherence of modern dogmatic materialism.
Resistance is futile.
Resistance is futile.
The other book is Stapledon’s Star Maker, which scientistic illuminist Arthur C. Clarke considered one of the most important works of science fiction.  Star Maker was written in 1937 and actually utilizes the theme of genetic engineering far ahead of its time, while Stapledon’s works would go on to influence other top British technocrats, such as H.G. Wells and Bertrand Russell.  This confirms my thesis thesis that Invasion is specifically referencing genetic engineering and cross-species manipulation with the bizarre “dog-man” scene, as the books were obviously chosen as specific clues as to elucidate this point.  Like Star Maker, Velikovsky too was interested in the idea of other lifeforms seeding our planet, a close adaptation of the theory others have called “panspermia.”  While Invasion is not dealing with panspermia specifically, the allusions to it in the film and  in the authors suggest an emergent, time-bound deus ex machina “creation,” in the least.  In other words, all three are proffering the cryptocracy’s relatively recently-constructed mythology of man’s creation, manipulation and/or guidance by “space brothers.”
Like the space jockey of Ridley Scott’s Alien and Prometheus, the gnostic reconstruction of ancient mythology and science is a likely scenario for uniting the world under a global faux religion.  In fact, panspermia has been promoted by top scientific luminaries, such Stephen Hawking, Sir Fred Hoyle and  Francis Crick.  There have been numerous hints at just this scenario, but here I am only speculating.  Ironically, whether one accepts the existence of aliens or not, the actual outworking of the cryptocracy’s worldview, like the aliens in Invasion, looks strangely similar to the biblical description of the demonic.  In Scripture, the demons seek to enslave man through mind control (possession), and the inducement to idolatry and self-destruction. Deuteronomy 32:16-18 reads:
“They provoked him to jealousy with strange gods, with abominations provoked they him to anger. They sacrificed unto devils, not to God; to gods whom they knew not, to new gods that came newly up, whom your fathers feared not.  Of the Rock that begat thee thou art unmindful, and hast forgotten God that formed thee.”
And St. Paul writes in Ephesians 6:12:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
Spock becomes Dr. Benjamin Spock.
Spock becomes Dr. Benjamin Spock.
What are we seeing in our day with the rise of the technocracy?  The progress and utopia promised by the Fabians and Wells?  On the contrary, the rise of the mass surveillance mind control pharmaceutical state, wherein the mind can be erased with new vaccines and pills, and new memories implanted.  But it doesn’t stop there – there are now clones and genetically bred cross-species mutations, from spider goats, to pigs with human organs, to DARPA’s supersoldiers, cross-species engineering is now a reality.  Sold to the masses in the same way the aliens convince San Francisco of their benevolent intentions, these advances, as well as cloning, are all the product of militarized warfare applications from giant black budget funding, not for the purpose of truly aiding the masses.  The very fact they are developed through war research alone should be enough to demonstrate the usage of bio weapons, GMOs, etc., has nothing to do with kindly big brother growing you a replacement arm or downloading your mind into a thumb drive.  In fact, the whole purpose of MKULTRA, ultimately, was how to use the techniques on the entire population.  The endgame of all this is the destruction of humanity, and the mindset of the dark force behind the technocracy is total enslavement, death and destruction.  In this regard, Invasion of the Body Snatchers is more revealing of the cryptocracy’s actual plans than most films.  The shadow establishment really does want to snatch your body, harness your energy, and wipe your mind.
See also:

First Look: Prometheus II Paradise

Orange County CPS Is the Latest to Facilitate Molestation and “Disappearing” Children


child-sex-rings-the-child-890x395_c
Former attorney, practicing psychotherapist and researcher, Susan Knowles, brought the case of Lexi Dillon to my attention in which the child’s mother brought sexual allegations against the father involving the girl. The evidence in support of the sexual abuse was overwhelming. However, Orange County CPS decided to take the child from the mother give her to the alleged abuser of the child.
The judge, in the case refused to allow any testimony in his courtroom from the experts who had examined young Lexi with regard to the sexual abuse charges. In fact this judge threatened the professional licenses of the witnesses who appeared to testify in juvenile court on behalf of the child and the mother.
The local police have conducted two investigations into the matter and have concluded that there was sexual abuse committed against Lexi. However, the judge keeps returning the girl to the alleged abuser. Amazingly, Lexi Dillon has gone missing while under the jurisdiction of the Orange County CPS.
The police have asked the District Attorney’ office to file charges. The District Attorney has, to date, refused to deal with this travesty in a timely fashion. This is typical of children who disappear into the CPS system, nationwide. Yes, I mean disappear. Lexi is missing and there is a growing fear that the girl is being trafficked out of the country, although this fact remains unconfirmed because it was brought to my attention by a source who desired anonymity.
The worst part of this case is that nobody in an official capacity is doing anything about this. Here is the contact information for the District Attorney along with the statutes that local police want filed as criminal charges against the father.
The local police want these charges filed against the father.
The local police want these charges filed against the father, the same father who Orange County CPS is protecting. The Common Sense Show is requesting the public call or write the District Attorney and demand that these charges be filed and to also launch a criminal investigation into the conduct of the Orange County CPS.
For the complete story in the Lexi Dillon case refer to Susan Knowles article on this horrific case.
Something is wrong in this country, terribly wrong. Many children are going missing from Child Protective Custody supervision, all across this country, with no record of what has happened to the thousands of missing children.

Oklahoma Tolerates “Missing Children”

In Oklahoma, Seventy-eight children went completely missing, last fall, with no explanation. The most frightening aspect of this development is that these children went missing while in custody of the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (DHS).
Even the Oklahoma media is asking questions. Millie Carpenter, who holds the position of DHS’s permanency and well-being program administrator, and her cohort, Melissa Jones, a DHS program supervisor, insist that there is nothing wrong and their publicly funded agency has made absolutely no mistakes. No mistakes? There are 78 children, under their care, who are missing! Nothing wrong?

Carpenter and Jones insist there is DHS accountability and that all 78 missing children should be considered to be runaways and that they have not been abducted. How would they know since the children are missing? 

Please allow me to emphasize that these 78 children were under the custody and care of DHS at the time of their disappearance. If these children had disappeared while in the custody of their parents, wouldn’t there be hell to pay regarding parental accountability? Both the authorities and the media should be asking questions about supervision and agency accountability. When these children were not in their tax-supported bed at night, why was nothing done?
Presumably, many of these children were removed from their parents by Child Protective Services and placed in DHS custody because their parents were accused of neglect and/or abuse. Isn’t DHS responsible for room and board? Each child is required to be accounted for with regard to state allocations for food and housing!  Therefore, can some responsible person of authority, connected to DHS, please explain to me why 78 missing person reports have not been filed? Why weren’t the police notified? If these children were removed from the parents home, then a court would have to be involved. As such, the courts should have been immediately notified when the children went missing because a court order was not being complied with.
If the missing 78 children in Oklahoma was just a case of gross dereliction of duty by officials such DHS administrators Carpenter and Jones, then we could fire the incompetent personnel and hire better people who would protect the children. But the fact that these children were not even reported as missing is inexcusable.
How do I know that something is terribly wrong? Simple. I used to be a mental health counselor and these types of administrative procedures were part of my training. The facts connected to the handling of these missing children does not add up. If the three stooges are not running Oklahoma’s DHS, then there is something very criminal going on. And the fact that the authorities are not up in arms and conducting a criminal investigation is highly suspicious and suggests further complicity at some official level. There is very good reason to expect a much deeper level of criminal activity related to these children because it has happened before.

The Penn State Case    ( me ....this is for ALL you's joe~pa fucking kooks )

The Oklahoma DHS scandal is nothing new. Agency or corporate controlled sex rings are hidden in plain sight. They often receive legitimacy from various government agencies and top corporate entities. Here is an example of how the child sex rings are hidden in the plain light of day.
Jerry Sandusky’s “The Second Mile Foundation”  was recognized as one of President Bush’s top “1000 Points of Light.” Interestingly, Marvin P. Bush was on the National Collegiate Athletic Association Board of Directors which helped make the selection. Former president, George H. W. “Pappy” Bush is no stranger to accusations of pedophilia as evidenced by the accompanying headline below this paragraph.
child-sex-rings-geo-bushCourt records show that former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky molested dozens, if not hundreds of children from at 1977 to 2011 when this animal was finally caught, convicted and sentenced.
Most Americans think that when Sandusky, received a 30 to 60 year prison term after being found guilty on 45 counts of the sexual exploitation of minors, that the case was closed.  And that is what the child sex trafficking industry and their allies in the corporate controlled media would have the public believe.
In actuality, the Sandusky case was quickly concluded in order to prevent any investigation from going forth which would reveal the extent to which pedophilia, for fun and profit, have ensnared the rich and famous powerful elite, both in this country and abroad.
Centre County Attorney, Ray Gricar, went missing while investigating the Sandusky child sex abuse ring.
Centre County Attorney, Ray Gricar, went missing while investigating the Sandusky child sex abuse ring.
Records show that Sandusky should have been convicted of child molestation in 1999 when allegations against him were first made. This particular incident was investigated by local police, referred to Centre County’s District Attorney, Ray Gricar, who refused to press charges despite the fact that the mother of the alleged victim had voicemail tapes and tape recordings of Sandusky and her son and their sexually explicit conversations. Friends of Gricar have said that he was frightened and was intimidated in not pursing charges despite overwhelming evidence. However, at a later time, Gricar developed some intestinal fortitude and reopened his investigation into Sandusky’s illicit conduct. Shortly thereafter, on his day off, Gricar went missing and his body has never been found. His laptop was found in a nearby creek, but none of the data could be retrieved according to the FBI investigative report. Gricar was declared legally dead in 2011, after the Sandusky scandal surfaced. The investigation of the apparent kidnapping and murder of Ray Gricar could politely be described as incomplete. Gricar’s fate is an all too common fate experienced by whistle blowers and investigators into the world-wide pedophile ring.
We now know that Sandusky obtained many of his victims from his precious Second Mile Foundation. How could the board members of The Second Mile Foundation expect a naive public to believe that from 1977 to 2011, that absolutely no Second Mile official, nobody at all, except for the abused children and Sandusky, had any knowledge of the abuse? Keep in mind that these young victims were pimped out in broad daylight as revealed in the court testimony. The Second Mile Foundation board members have associations which reach into the highest pinnacles of power in this country including Richard Struthers of Bank of America, Michael O’Donnell, Jake Corman (Pennsylvania State Senator), Vice President of Morgan Stanley and Matt Millen an ESPN football analyst. Additionally, many of the Penn State donors have intimate connections to both Second Mile and some of the top politicians in this country. And for 34 years, nobody at Second Mile knew? Well, District Attorney Ray Gricar knew and he’s dead.

Where Is Nancy Schaefer When We Need Her?

Georgia State Senator, Nancy Schaefer was 'suicided" while exposing CPS.
Georgia State Senator, Nancy Schaefer was ‘suicided” while exposing CPS.
Former Georgia State Senator, Nancy Schaefer was an outspoken opponent of Child Protective Services (CPS). Schaefer authored an investigation in which, among other findings, revealed the following:
“…the separation of families is growing as a business because local governments have grown accustomed to having taxpayer dollars to balance their ever-expanding budgets.
The Adoption and the Safe Families Act, set in motion by President Bill Clinton,  offered cash “bonuses” to the states for every child they adopted out of foster care. In order to receive the “adoption incentive bonuses” local child protective services need more children. They must have merchandise (children) that sell and you must have plenty of them so the buyer can choose. Some counties are known to give a $4,000 bonus for each child adopted and an additional $2,000 for a “special needs” child. And there is even more money when the child is returned to the estranged father. CPS mployees work to keep the federal dollars flowing.
The National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect in 1998 reported that six times as many children died in foster care than in the general public and that once removed to official “safety”, these children are far more likely to suffer abuse, including sexual molestation than in the general population.
That according to the California Little Hoover Commission Report in 2003, 30% to 70% of the children in California group homes do not belong there and should not have been removed from their homes.
…poor parents often times are targeted to lose their children because they do not have the where-with-all to hire lawyers and fight the system. Being poor does not mean you are not a good parent or that you do not love your child, or that your child should be removed and placed with strangers.”
In this document, Schaefer makes it clear that organizations, such as The Second Mile, procure their underage victims by making children wards of the State. CPS has unchecked legal authority to remove children, with or without cause. Subsequently, CPS and their partners, the corrupt juvenile court judges can place these children wherever they see fit (e.g. The Franklin House, Boys Town, Elm House, The Second Mile Foundation) where unimaginable horrors take place.
As most of us know, Nancy Schaefer and her husband Bruce were “suicided” in 2010, on the same day she was attempting to reach out to talk show host Alex Jones, because she knew she was in deep trouble.

Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney

And of course, there is the omnipresent DynCorp child sex trafficking scandal. On March 11th 2005, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney grilled Secretary Rumsfeld and General Myers on the DynCorp child sex trafficking case. “Mr. Secretary, I watched President Bush deliver a moving speech at the United Nations in September 2003, in which he mentioned the crisis of the sex trade. The President called for the punishment of those involved in this horrible business. But at the very moment of that speech, DynCorp was exposed for having been involved in the buying and selling of young women and children. While all of this was going on, DynCorp kept the Pentagon contract to administer the smallpox and anthrax vaccines, and is now working on a plague vaccine through the Joint Vaccine Acquisition Program. Mr. Secretary, is it the policy of the U.S. Government to reward companies that traffic in women and little girls?” Rumsfeld fumbled around and blamed a single employee of DynCorp for these transgressions and DynCorp, at that time, continued to receive government contracts.
McKinney was subsequently driven from office. Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich is one of very few government officials in high office aside from Cynthia McKinney to demand answers on this issue. And what may you ask happened to Blagojevich? He was framed for trying to sell Obama’s senatorial seat in a story that made no sense. Does this tell us how high up the corruption goes?

Conclusion

Whether it is Lexi Dillion or the missing 78 Oklahoma children provides, the American people have an opportunity, with the facts that have come to light, to blow the lid off of this nationwide conspiracy once and for all. How many of these missing children are dead? How many were forced into child sex-slavery rings as is believed by many to be the case with Lexi Dilion? Or, as Oklahoma’s DHS claims, are these children simply “run away” children? How many corrupt judges, district and county attorneys simply turn a blind eye to this holocaust despite being “officers of the court”?
America, we have an important decision to make. Are we going to press for answers? Will we demand that heads roll in places like Larimer County CO., Virginia, Orange County, CA., and in Oklahoma and subsequently demand an honest and thorough nationwide investigation headed by Congress, as Cynthia McKinney serves as the Child Sex Trafficking Czar in charge of the investigation.. Meanwhile, where’s Lexi? Where are the missing 78 children? Where is Ray Gricar?
If we will not rise up as a nation to protect our children, our most precious asset, then we do not deserve to survive as a nation.
Dave Hodges is the Editor and Host of The Common Sense Show.

FLIGHT CONTROL: Boeing’s ‘Uninterruptible’ Autopilot System, Drones & Remote Hijacking

Shawn Helton
21st Century Wire

Following the apparent ‘vanishing act’ of Malaysian Airlines flight MH370, many investigators and researchers began to question the likelihood of such an event happening in today’s high-tech world. Here at 21WIRE, we’ve also looked into the unprecedented disappearance of MH370 and the subsequent downing of MH17, as certain details have come to light regarding the history of the autopilot function within Boeing commercial airliners, seemingly opening the door to the events of 9/11…
The Boeing 777 along with other Boeing models, can in fact be flown remotely through the use of independent embedded software and satellite communication. Once this advanced system is engaged, it can disallow any pilot or potential hijacker from controlling a plane, as the rooted setup uses digital signals that communicate with air traffic control, satellite links, as well as other government entities for the remainder of a flight’s destination. This technology is known as the Boeing Honeywell ‘Uninterruptible’ autopilot system.

IMAGE: ‘A jet for the 21st century’ – An interior view of a Boeing 777-200 ER cockpit. In the case of MH370, the aircraft’s Rolls Royce Trent 892 Engines sent ‘automated pings’ independent of the plane’s transponder, to an Inmarsat satellite for several hours after subsequently losing contact with air traffic controllers. The automated information gave an up to date diagnosis as to the well being of the two engines, which according to data received, were fully operational and showed no signs of electrical damage. Rolls Royce has a partnership that requires the engine to transmit live data to its global engine health monitoring center in Derby, UK every 30 minutes. Investigators are said to have used the ACARS information uploaded to the engine maker (Photo becuo.com).Uninterruptible flight controlOn December 4th of 2006, it was announced that Boeing had won a patent on an uninterruptible autopilot system for use in commercial aircraft, this was the first public acknowledgment by Boeing about the existence of such an autopilot system. The new autopilot patent was reported by John Croft for Flight Global, the news piece was subsequently linked by a Homeland Security News Wire and other British publications around the same time. According to the DHS release, it was disclosed that “dedicated electrical circuits” within an onboard flight system could control a plane without the need of pilots, stating that the advanced avionics would fly the aircraft remotely, independently of those operating the plane:

The “uninterruptible” autopilot would be activated – either by pilots, by onboard sensors, or even remotely via radio or satellite links by government agencies like the Central Intelligence Agency, if terrorists attempt to gain control of a flight deck.”

The Flight Global news wire goes on to report that the uninterruptible autopilot system was designed for increased security in the event of a manual hijacking situation, as Boeing itself describes the feature as a preventative measure, keeping unauthorized persons out of a cockpit, setting the stage for an industry wide safety protocol:

There is a need in the industry for a technique that conclusively prevents unauthorised persons for gaining access to the controls of the vehicle and therefore threatening the safety of the passengers onboard the vehicle, and/or other people in the path of travel of the vehicle, thereby decreasing the amount of destruction individuals onboard the vehicle would be capable of causing.”
Additionally, in the article entitled, “Diagrams: Boeing patents anti-terrorism auto-land system for hijacked airliners,” Croft outlines the clandestine oversight that government has with respect to the uninterruptible autopilot, making note of the auto-land function of the system and stating that the technology has its own power supply self-sufficient of the the aircraft:

To make it fully independent, the system has its own power supply, independent of the aircraft’s circuit breakers. The aircraft remains in automatic mode until after landing, when mechanics or government security operatives are called in to disengage the system.”




IMAGE: The United States patent for the Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot dated November, 28th 2006. Boeing and Honeywell have been heavily involved in UAV technology for both civilian and military applications. Some researchers have suggested that both corporations could ‘recoup’ the cost of their applied science technology for military development from the commercial sector. It has also been said that Boeing and Honeywell developed existing patents for the Department of Defense for over 40 years including the BHAUP system (Photo flightglobal.com)

A pilotless pursuit with precision guided munitions

The idea of remote controlled avionics is nothing new, i
n actuality, ‘fly-by-wire‘ electronic signal technology has its roots in the early the 20th Century and if you go back even further the realization of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV’s) takes us back to 1849, where Austria was said to have launched 200 pilotless bomb filled balloons over the city of Venice, resulting in the Republic of San Marco being besieged by Austrian forces less than a week later. Additionally, in 1898, the well-known inventor and engineer Nikola Tesla, had successfully demonstrated remote control technology through the creation of two small radio powered boats.

The advancement of radio controlled unmanned aircraft was seen during WW1 with the pilotless biplane and aerial torpedo known as the Kettering Bug, a primitive UAV that, according to some estimates, was capable of hitting ground targets 40 miles away. The ‘Bug’ had a similar method to the Wright Brothers dolly track system powered flights of the early 1900′s but needed a better autopilot function, which prompted Kettering to enlist American engineer and inventor Elmer Sperry with his gyroscopic stabilizers that revolutionized the autopilot feature and with it the concept of remote control flight.


IMAGE: ‘Blood & Bones’ – Charles Kettering’s ‘Bug’ UAV, he was also known for his discovery and production of tetra-ethyl lead or TEL apparently left over 5 million toxic tons of the substance within the United States. It has been said there were vast implications of TEL genetically speaking, particularly in terms of the amount of lead exposure in humans, leading to blood, bone and cell toxicity (Photo commons.wikimedia.org).

Coincidentally, as Charles Kettering‘s ‘Bug’ biplane gained notoriety, Kettering’s research team discovered the high-octane booster called  tetra-ethyl lead (TEL) which prompted the interest of several manufacturer’s from around the globe, notably, the Rockefeller’s Standard Oil Company, GM, Ethyl Gasoline Corporation and the Nazi-linked chemical corporation IG Farben before the second world war. A consortium of American companies were openly engaged in fueling the development of many of the Nazi party’s military pursuits, as the occupying faction latched on to the pilotless Kettering Bug concept, creating a fleet of their own unmanned flying-projectiles known as Buzz Bombs, which tormented London during WW2.

Later under Operation Paper Clip, the Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (JIOA) employed many of the scientists and engineers affiliated with the applied military development for the Nazi party, including a division of scientists working on remote control technology. The former German occupation supporter’s were scrubbed and ‘bleached’ of their dark past, as they were allowed to work for the United States government unbeknownst to the vast majority of public at the time.


In the mid 1940′s, there was a strong push for remote controlled flying vehicles like the GB-1 Glide Bomb, along with several other UAV drone-types that had been developed for various military operations towards the end of the World War. The GB-4 could engage targets via a television camera located underneath its warhead but could only function properly in the best weather conditions.

Around this same time , the disastrous Operation Aphrodite was conducted using B-17′s and B-24′s with a gutted interior, they were fully loaded with Torpex explosives while manned crews operated the first part of the journey, later the crew would attempt to parachute out over the English Channel, giving control of the craft over to a manned mothership remotely, communicating with ground control units. In 1944, a B-17 ‘Flying Fortress’ manned by Lt Joseph Kennedy and co-pilot Lt Wilford John Willy failed, as the pair were unable to parachute out before the aircraft’s explosives detonated apparently due to an electrical malfunction, marking the demise of the military operation. Kennedy’s alleged target was the underground Nazi military complex, the Fortress of Mimoyecques. The operation is said to have had only one successful mission after a dozen or so failed flights.

In 1946, the Pilotless Aircraft Branch was created during the rise of the RAND corporation’s first classified projects, as it has been said that RAND research began looking into satellite controlled vehicles, noting that satellites could be applied to all types of military and civilian applications in the future.

The creation of combat UAV’s 

In March of 1996, the RQ-3 DarkStar drone manufactured by Lockeed Martin and Boeing, could make an entirely human free flight, with its operating ‘sensors’ acquiring targets and the transmission of flight path information in a ‘fully autonomous’ way. It is also important to note that the programming language used in a Boeing 777, is the same language used for Boeing’s DarkStar drone – Ada-95 programming.

The blend of old bomb-based UAV’s and surviellance drones took shape in the late 90′s with many advancements made to the electronic systems during the 80′s, including the addition of real-time spy capabilities. The creation of the war on terror, along with 9/11, ushered in a whole new realm of defense spending for armed drone technology, marking it the age of weaponized UAV’s, with the Global Hawk, Predator and Reaper drones used in the extrajudicial killing of targeted individuals and enemy combatants with or without a ‘hot’ battlefield, which has seemingly become a lucrative business model for defense contractors and the military industrial complex since the turn of the century. 


IMAGE: ‘Battle of the Atlantic’ –  The Royal Air Force Consolidated B-24 Liberator. The RAF operated most of the first production of the B-24′s when they were completed. During Operation Aphrodite some were converted to be used in manned/unmanned missions (Photo airspacemag.com).
Lightning BugIMAGE: ‘Combat Dawn’ The Ryan Aeronautical Lightning Bug, along with the Ryan Firebee drone missions consisted primarily of intelligence gathering, radio monitoring and reconnaissance. Both were controlled remotely to spy on China, North Korea and Vietnam, during the 60′s and 70′s. The Vietnam War spy drones were the basis for the use of modern drones (Photo understandingtheempire.com).

Remote control over commercial aircraft
The NASA Dryden Flight Research Center and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) joined efforts for a remote controlled flight experiment called the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID), the year was 1984. The test conducted included the use of a remote controlled Boeing 720 aircraft to study the ‘effectiveness’ of anti-misting kerosene or (AMK), during what was considered to be a survivable impact. The AMK was added to standard jet fuel to suppress the explosion upon the purposeful impact. This is the description of what happened during the flight experiment according to NASA’s own website:

On the morning of December 1, 1984, a remotely controlled Boeing 720 transport took off from Edwards Air Force Base (Edwards, California), made a left-hand departure and climbed to an altitude of 2300 feet. It then began a descent to-landing to a specially prepared runway on the east side of Rogers Dry Lake. Final approach was along the roughly 3.8 degree glide slope. The landing gear was left retracted. Passing the decision height of 150 feet above ground level (AGL), the aircraft was slightly to the right of the desired path. Just above that decision point at which the pilot was to execute a “go-around,” there appeared to be enough altitude to maneuver back to the centerline of the runway. Data acquisition systems had been activated, and the aircraft was committed to impact. It contacted the ground, left wing low. The fire and smoke took over an hour to extinguish.”


IMAGE: ‘ Remotely Downed’ – This was an interior picture of the Boeing 720 that was used in the Controlled Impact Demonstration in 1984 via remote control telemetry systems(Photo dfrc.nasa.gov).

The controlled impact operation was outlined as an innocuous flight study for safety but its important to keep in mind that this was one of the first pieces of evidence that a large commercial airliner could be flown by remote uplink and ‘pulse code modulated’ downlink telemetry systems17 years before 9/11 and 30 years before the apparent disappearance of MH370. Uplink signals were sent from a ground cockpit control to the aircraft’s omnidirectional antenna proving a large Boeing could be flown remotely nearly two decades before the September 11th tragedy:
“The aircraft was remotely flown by NASA research pilot Fitzhugh (Fitz) Fulton from the NASA Dryden Remotely Controlled Vehicle Facility. Previously, the Boeing 720 had been flown on 14 practice flights with safety pilots onboard. During the 14 flights, there were 16 hours and 22 minutes of remotely piloted vehicle control, including 10 remotely piloted takeoffs, 69 remotely piloted vehicle controlled approaches, and 13 remotely piloted vehicle landings on abort runway.”

IMAGE: ‘Drone Jet’ - NASA’s N833NA, was a remotely-piloted Boeing 720 airliner, here you see it making a practice approach over the impact zone on Rogers Dry Lake, California on December 1st, 1984, following 4 years of preparation. The crash test was widely regarded as a complete failure in terms of the flame-reducing fuel additive, but the real prize was remotely flying a huge airliner, which was a soaring success (Photo thisdayinaviation.com).
The YouTube video below has the original footage of the CID crash test conducted in 1984, showing that the Boeing 720 was remote controlled with ease before its intended impact…


Boeing 720 Crash in desert


In October of 2001, Raytheon designed and successfully developed a GPS ground station through an Air Force contract with the Joint Precision Approach and Landings System (JPALS) program. This system was said to be an anti-jam landing system for various weather conditions with “planned civil systems utilizing the same technology.”

Raytheon and JPALS conducted 6 automated landings with the JPALS feature configured on the Boeing 727:

The FedEx Express 727-200 aircraft at Holloman successfully conducted a total of sixteen Category I approaches. After completing a number of pilot flown approaches for reference the aircraft conducted six full autolands using the JPALS ground station. “The consistency of the approaches allowed us to proceed to actual autolandings with very little delay,” said Steve Kuhar, Senior Technical Advisor Flight Department for FedEx Express.”



9/11 & remote technologyAfter the 9/11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, President Bush called for the creation of remote control systems in commercial airliners in the event of an emergency, granting air traffic controllers along with other government agencies control over an aircraft – for its final intended destination. Based on history, we know that the Flight Management Systems within Boeing models are capable of assisting the entire flight through its remote autopilot functions at least since 1984, well before Bush’s politically charged ‘remote control’ flight claim in the aftermath of 9/11.

In the mid-80′s, the coded software on the plane would send data to ground control stations, accepting any return flight information or auto-land command. In addition to civilian aircraft being flown remotely before it was acknowledged, the U.S. Air Force apparently constructed an F-106 Delta Dart fighter to be controlled remotely on a combat mission in 1959 under the direction of the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD).

There is also a long held theory that the company Lufthansa, Germany’s state owned airline, had their onboard flight controls stripped from its fleet during the early 1990′s for fear that the American government could hack into the airline’s autopilot systems, this idea has been loosely associated with the interview of former German Defense Minister Andreas von Bülow conducted by Stephan Lebert for the German Daily discussing some of the major anomalies in the events surrounding 9/11:

There is also the theory of one British flight engineer: According to this, the steering of the planes was perhaps taken out of the pilots’ hands, from outside. The Americans had developed a method in the 1970s, whereby they could rescue hijacked planes by intervening into the computer piloting [automatic pilot system].”

Von Bülow continued by outlining the difficulty of pulling such a cataclysmic plot  without a massive support apparatus from state run operations:

 “I can state: the planning of the attacks was technically and organizationally a master achievement. To hijack four huge airplanes within a few minutes and within one hour, to drive them into their targets, with complicated flight maneuvers! This is unthinkable, without years-long support from secret apparatuses of the state and industry.”

It’s difficult to know if Von Bülow’s account of the alleged British flight engineer is completely true, but many researchers and investigators have cited a man by the name of Joe Vallis, as the apparent insider engineer, who according to other sources, was said to have spilled state secrets about the alleged remote control ‘Home Run’ technology supposedly involving two American multinational corporations and DARPA, during the 1970′s.

Critics have charged that Vallis was nothing more than an agent provocateur with ties to British intelligence, sending internet sleuths on a fruitless journey. Whether or not Vallis was a real whistleblower or a partially mythologized creation following 9/11, its important to remember that there are autopilot patents similar to the kind that were supposedly discussed by Vallis and when you couple that with the entire history remote control technology, a compelling case begins to emerge, as advanced uninterruptible autopilot avionics could have been in full use prior to 9/11.

Here’s a YouTube clip of the former German Member of Parliament and Government Defense Minister discussing the manufactured nature of 9/11 and the profitable War on Terror that followed…

Andreas Von Bülow On 9 11


There are so many questions when looking at 9/11 and one of the more important topics that keeps coming up over the years, is the unlikely act that inexperienced terror-pilots were able to precisely fly a Boeing 767, or 757 with almost zero room for error into the Pentagon and WTC buildings, as it has been said that flight UA 175 maintained a constant ‘angle of bank’ that stretched for apparently 1.2 miles, before it collided with WTC 2, prompting many investigators to hypothesize the possibility of remote control flight, including 9/11 researcher, Aidan Monaghan, in an article for Boiling Frogs Post:

The observed turn stability favors the use of autopilot operation, either functioning in a conventional course control mode or in Control Wheel Steering (CWS) mode. The probability that either of these two control systems were used is discussed. Flight deck images of United and American airlines 757s and 767s suggest that such CWS functions may have been disabled circa 2001. Constant radius turns utilizing plotted waypoints during commercial aviation operations are routinely supported by augmented GPS navigation service and related commercial Flight Management Systems (FMS) available circa 2001.”


The historical context of the Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Autopilot Patent
In 1914, the American multinational conglomerate known as Honeywell,
began acquiring and merging with various companies to create Honeywell Aerospace and was well on its way to becoming the largest manufacturer of aircraft engines and avionics.

Historically speaking, the Sperry Corporation held the very first autopilot patent in 1916 and in August of 1956, Honeywell had its first autopilot patent, ushering the race for future UAV technology in its multifaceted applications with the Automatic control apparatus for aircraft patent US 2953329 A. Through Honeywell’s acquisition of many aerospace and avionics based companies a number of patents for future use were consolidated under their ownership. From the 1950′s through the 1980′s Honeywell had many technological breakthroughs, whether it was the Ring Laser Gyroscope in 1958, a device that determined acceleration information for navigation and better flight control, or the Glass Cockpit digital displays of 1980, which was driven by the Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) software, both of these advances in avionics were vital to the creation of the uninterruptible autopilot, as its combined precursor.
Boeing filed for a patent called “Composite Aircraft” in 1954 that related to the ‘method and means’ to control an airliner.

In 1984 and 1986, Honeywell had two very important patents pertaining to the modernization of Flight Management System technology, both helping with the integration of automated flight digital data processing and in 1995, Boeing filed a patent for an “alternate destination planner,” to be used in conjunction with other Honeywell patents.
In 1995, Boeing and Honeywell participated in the Category III-b flight test conducted at NASA’s Wallops Island, Virginia, using a Boeing 757 completing a number of automated landings. The functionality of automated flight returns benefited greatly from the realization of global positioning systems (GPS) around that time.

There are many other patents between Boeing and Honeywell that also aided in the development of the BHAUP system. Airline manufacturers and avionics makers benefited greatly from the Technological Revinvestiment Project TRP) that was put in place by President Clinton in 1993, as the TRP was said to grant funds to certain companies of ‘merit’ for products that had both a civilian and military purpose.

In a YouTube report by James Corbett we see a how the questions of MH370, could lead us to the answers of 9/11…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Nt4Z1tUHgE




Revelations of a pilot
The idea of an uninterruptible remote controlled commercial airliner is shocking and during 21WIRE’s examination of missing flight MH370, we came across retired Delta pilot, Field McConnell, a 35-year flight veteran who cites that since 1995, Boeing Honeywell Uninterruptible Auto Pilots have been equipped in Boeing planes, including Airbus planes since 1989. At the start of this article, there were several publications that discussed the controversial autopilot feature a year prior to a subsequent lawsuit by McConnell in February of 2007, and according to his documents, the modification was reported to the FAA, NTSB and ALPA ( airline pilots association). Apparently due to McConnell’s lawsuit, Boeing was is said to have stated that by end of 2009 all Boeing planes would be fitted with the BHUAP - making them impossible to manually hijack within the plane but susceptible to remote control by the military, according the flight veteran. 
In addition to the advanced avionics avoiding manual hijack through its systems, the AFDS-770 Autopilot Flight Director System, according McConnell, is said to be a ‘slave’ of the Flight Management System making the ‘remote hijacking’ of anything other than entities linked to the FMS and its fellow operating systems unlikely – if not impossible. Boeing’s Areo Magazine described the FMS as “designing and implementing automated flight paths.”

Although the investigative site Able Danger has had many controversial claims over the years through the collaborative work of McConnell and Forensic Economist David Hawkins, it does seems as though the lid has come off in regards to the historical record of the Boeing Honeywell uninterruptible autopilot, as numerous references have surfaced online recently, including a brand new Wikipedia page created in July. While Wikipedia itself isn’t considered a noted reliable source, the page for BHAUP does have links to other major media outlets discussing the glass cockpit system, including Boeing’s own acknowledgement of the system. There was even an article that appeared 11 years ago in August of 2003, on the popular technology site for Wired magazine, linked to a Wall Street Journal report entitled, “Flying Safety Put on Auto-Pilot,” a feature that discussed the auto-pilot systems already in place:
Airbus and Honeywell are close to perfecting technology that takes control of airplanes to prevent them from crashing into obstacles, The Wall Street Journal reports. When audible warnings from crash-avoidance systems are ignored, the system overrides actions by the pilot and takes evasive maneuvers, the newspaper said.”
“The system would link crash-warning devices, already common on airliners, with cockpit computers that could automate flying to prevent collisions, executives from Honeywell (HON) said.

Another development that helped with flight navigation of airliners was the Future Air Navigation System (FANS) with Boeing and Honeywell once again at the precipice of  avionics advancement, as FANS used GPS to navigate through remote areas or oceans of  the world. The feature was also said to have given an airline operator the ability to upload alternate flight paths.In November of 2013, there was a federal register for 777-200 ER Boeing’s, stating that there were modifications done to the electrical based systems to prevent unauthorized internal access in the aircraft.

Other documented evidence of communication development within a Boeing 777, comes from Philip Birtles, in his book, “Boeing 777 – Jetliner for a New Century:”
Honeywell’s massive effort on the 777 involved over 550 software developers. The company built the AIMS computer as a custom platform based on the AMD 29050 processor. It was unique among aviation systems for integrating the other computers’ functions; in other systems, each function resides in a different box [the central maintenance had its own box with its own input/output (I/O), its own central processing unit (CPU), etc.]. AIMS combines all these functions and shares the CPU and I/O among them: it uses the same signals for flight management and for displays, so that the data comes in only once instead of twice; one input circuit provides data to all of the functions.”

In McConnell’s message about the airline industry, he has claimed that are other examples of aircraft being downed remotely, including Air France’s flight 447, Adam Air 574Kenya Airways 507. McConnell also mentions the ‘autoland’ and ‘autobrake’ feature for Boeing 777 plane, as it was referenced in the above NASA portion of this article. Additionally, the Malaysian Airlines Boeing 777′s are outfitted the ACARS communication systems as well as satellite links through SATCOM according to Honeywell. The satellite/GPS based autopilot features of today owe quite a bit the Quartz Rate Sensor used primarily in drone UAV’s.

Some of McConnell’s latest findings along with his partner Hawkins, have connected MH370′s disappearance to British multinational Serco, as many of the UK’s defense functions were granted to Serco throughout the years, including “Skynet satellite military communications necessary for a remotely-controlled hijack.” Over the years, Serco has been outsourced to provide support for various enterprises by governments all over the world, heading up air traffic control services throughout many parts of the globe, maritime security, outfitting operations for modes of transportation such as buses and metro systems, running security operations for private prisons, all while overseeing Britain’s military ballistic munitions and nuclear arsenal since 1964 – as a complex project management provider. 

Here’s a YouTube video looking at McConnell’s case information as it relates to BHUAP…

Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot



Boeing, Inmarsat & Serco business arrangements in the wake of tragedy 

There is an established relationship between Serco, “the global support services company,” and the British satellite telecommunications company Inmarsat, a company who was responsible for the satellite data used to track down MH370 through its ‘handshake’ links, data which has subsequently turned up empty, prompting many to question the various business arrangements involving the support services company Serco and Inmarsat.

Other connections between Serco and Inmarsat bring us to Former Royal Air Force Electronics Engineer, Gordon McMillan, who 1995, was the Operations Director for Serco Aerospace as he later moved on to Inmarsat’s Director of Government services from 2006-2011 and is now the director of Inmarsat’s GX Programme which is partnered up with Boeing to finish the development of the three remaining broadband Inmarsat-5 satellites. In 2013, Serco was scrutinized as they were under investigation for fraud.

Mass media distortion

On March 28th, 20 days after the apparent disappearance of MH370, the Boeing uninterruptible autopilot system was openly discussed on air during CNN’s ‘The Situation Room’ with Wolf Blizter. Here is the link to the CNN transcript posted below. What the show failed to disclose with those familiar with Boeing’s integrated avionics, is that the pilots themselves do not have to trigger anything manually in order to have this system engaged, as it is fully independent of an airliner’s power supply. Boeing like Rolls Royce, has been virtually silent on the issue of MH370, aside from some misleading information as to the whereabouts of MH370. See how the mainstream media tiptoes around the BHUAP:

BRIAN TODD, CNN CORRESPONDENT: “Wolf, it’s called the uninterruptible Autopilot System. This was reported on about seven years ago by the Homeland Security Newswire and by The Daily Mail. According to these reports, Boeing got a patent for some technology that would enable the plane to be flown by remote control from the ground in the event of an emergency. Now, in a situation of distress in this scenario, the pilot could flick a switch or maybe some kind of a sensor could trigger the autopilot. The autopilot could then be activated by radio or satellite. And our aviation analyst, Mark Weiss, explains what would happen next.”

MARK WEISS, CNN AVIATION ANALYST: “Everything now that the pilots would try to do would be inconsequential because the ground controller would be handling its flight path, its landing gear, its flap system, configuring the aircraft for a landing to a safe place and really taking away the hostile threat.”

TODD: “Now, Mark Weiss says that if that technology was in place now, if this was in all planes and this had widespread capability now, there’s a chance — a chance, Wolf, that this could have saved Malaysia Air Flight 370, but also it may not have. Again, we don’t know a lot of detail about what happened in that cockpit. But if this had been in place then, that’s why we’re raising this now, that it may have played a factor in possibly saving that plane in a certain scenario.”

“We have to say, Boeing is giving us absolutely no comment on this. We’ve come back to them repeatedly, tell us about this patent, tell us about this technology, are you still pursuing it. Nothing. They want nothing to say — they have nothing to say about it right now.”

Hacking, propaganda & security contracts in the aftermath of a disaster

IMAGE: ‘Hack in the Box Origami’ – Hugo Teso works as a security consultant in Berlin, Germany at n.runs AG. He became a media sensation in April of 2013, when he claimed that he could hack into a plane’s Flight Management Systems via his smartphone (Photo niunpeloderubia.wordpress.com).
In April of 2013, Hugo Teso, an apparent former commercial pilot turned IT security-hack-guru, made waves when he told a crowd gathered at the Hack in the Box computer security and hacker conference held in Amsterdam, that he could hack into a plane’s ACARS flight system. According to the applied science used in flight management this would be unprecedented.

Below is a YouTube video of Teso at the Hack in the Box conference located in Amsterdam, discussing his controversial his apparent plane hack…

#HITB2013AMS D1T1 Hugo Teso - Aircraft Hacking: Practical Aero Series



In an article for Avionics Today, the FAA denied the hacker’s ability to change the flight’s hardware system. This could be because the coded BHAUP software is built into the FMS and has other systems acting as a slave to its command functions using the same technology seen in the DarkStar drone:

The FAA is aware that a German information technology consultant has alleged he has detected a security issue with the Honeywell NZ-2000 Flight Management System (FMS) using only a desktop computer. The FAA has determined the the hacking technique described during a recent computer security conference does not pose a flight safety concern because it does not work on certified flight hardware.”It was recently announced in late July that the FAA was looking to launch its next generation GPSsatellite-based air traffic control system.” Again the timing here is incredible, as the roll-out for autonomous flight control has been an arduously slow process, taking full advantage of aviation disasters along the way:

The FAA has been gradually implementing elements of the new, so-called NextGen system to replace a radar-based system used since the end of World War II. NextGen incorporates global positioning technology similar to systems on smart phones and car dashboards, allowing air traffic controllers to track aircraft more precisely. The system’s enhanced precision, say proponents, reduces the space and time between planes taking off or landing.”
It appears as though the FAA has opened the door for the eventual full disclosure of the BHUAP, communications with satellite GPS systems, planes and air traffic control that have already been in use. This could have been a premeditated slow roll-out to get the public to accept the reality of this technology.

IMAGE: ‘Sky Shield’ – C-Music counter defense laser system will be used against MANPADS. The pod is located under the plane’s fuselage.The Israeli defense electronics company Elbit Systems, has managed to have some timely new developments in the wake of MH17′s apparent downing this past July. Elbit has been able to create a wide range of avionics for dual use in military and civilian aircraft use. Below as an excerpt from Royal Aeronautical Society:
Given then these lethal threats – can anything be done for civil airliners? Modern military aircraft carry a wide range of defensive aids, from electronic jamming pods, to chaff and flare dispensers to spoof incoming missiles. Larger aircraft such as tankers, transports and VIP assets also can be equipped with DIRCM (directed infra-red countermeasures) a laser in a turret able to burn an IR missile seeker out. However, against radar-guided missiles, HVA (high value assets) such as transport aircraft, would in the first instance, be kept well away from these threats.”

The Royal Aeronautical Society goes on to discuss other more determined and lethal options in the throes of conflict following the highly controversial downing of MH17:

There is one other related point that the loss of MH17 and military aircraft to SAMs over Ukraine highlights – that is the need for stealth aircraft, EW and SEAD to effectively counter these ground-based threats in modern conflicts.”

Despite mainstream media’s revisionist claims that MH17 had to fly over a known warzone, we know that the Kiev-based Ukrainian Air Traffic Control (ATC) ordered MH17 off of its original flight path along the international air route, known as L980. The media has stated that MH17 was flying its intended route, even though there is evidence of the contrary.

The anomalies surrounding MH370, MH17, along with the hijacked airliners on 9/11, are closer to being understood as more information continues to be pieced together from exploratory investigation. Below is an interview with flight veteran Field McConnell on 21WIRE’s The Sunday Wire radio show uncovering more details about the Boeing Uninterruptible Autopilot and how it works.