Sunday, June 4, 2017

Leaked document reveals internet trolls are government agents


~ hehe gov. A~gents ...

Glenn Greenwald is a journalist, constitutional lawyer, political commentator and best-selling author. He’s perhaps best known for working with NSA document leaker Edward Snowden to expose the sneaky surveillance tactics used by governments and government agencies.
And while the issues surrounding privacy and the government’s invasion of it have grabbed a lot of the spotlight, Snowden’s NSA document leak revealed another intriguing government hobby and tactic – Internet trolling.
The Five Eyes Alliance consists of intelligence agencies belonging to the United States, Canada, Britain, Australia and New Zealand.
2000px-UKUSA_Map.svg
It was Britain’s GCHQ that drew up the documents proposing that Internet trolls be employed to “control, infiltrate, manipulate and warp online discourse,” as Greenwald writes in his article aptly titled “How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive and Destroy Reputations.”

In the article, Greenwald shares one of the documents – a manual, no less – revealing the exact tactics proposed by government agencies to hijack online discussions by trolling.
Greenwald explains:
Among the core self-identified purposes of JTRIG are two tactics: (1) to inject all sorts of false material onto the internet in order to destroy the reputation of its targets; and (2) to use social sciences and other techniques to manipulate online discourse and activism to generate outcomes it considers desirable. To see how extremist these programs are, just consider the tactics they boast of using to achieve those ends: “false flag operations” (posting material to the internet and falsely attributing it to someone else), fake victim blog posts (pretending to be a victim of the individual whose reputation they want to destroy), and posting “negative information” on various forums.

Forums and Facebook posts attempting to educate the public on the dangers of vaccines are what that government and Big Pharma-employed trolls target most.

shutterstock_337142630
Few topics are as polarizing and provocative as those surrounding vaccines and their potential dangers. The amount of skin government agencies (as well as Big Pharma) have in the vaccination industry makes it predictable that trolls would be employed to disrupt any attempt at civilly discussing vaccine policy. Consider that a new CDC-approved vaccine might be worth $30 billion a year to Big Pharma — $30 billion a year!
RELATED ARTICLE:
It’s especially unsurprising when you consider that the revolving door between the government and the pharmaceutical industry — where an individual like Dr. Julie Gerberding works for the CDC and then gives up her tenure to be hired to work at the pharmaceutical giant Merck.
Government legislation is consistently passed in favor of the vaccination industry. The Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) even redefined the term “biogenics” in an effort to get patients to agree to vaccinations as part of their treatment plan whenever they enter the hospital for any reason (if they have not already been vaccinated).
As one nurse puts it, you could go to the hospital for an injured toe and in the paperwork presented to you, you would be offered a whole variety of vaccines. If you declined, a flag would be placed on your file.
The following are instructions from pro-vaccine blog ORAC, also known as “Respectful Insolence” for dealing with anti-vaxxers by trolling:
“Use emotional warfare on anti-vax blogs. Tell emotional stories full of tears and sobbing and unbearable grief and terror, about people in your own family or people you read about, who were sick with or died of terrible diseases. Don’t hold back details about bodily fluids and suchlike: the more gross the better. This stuff has a way of infiltrating the minds of readers and subtly influencing their decisions, in a manner similar to advertising.
 … Go in there and “agree with them” and then say things that appear thoroughly delusional, overtly nuts, blatantly and obviously wrong even to nincompoops, etc. Occasional spelling and grammar errors are also useful but don’t over-do. The point of this exercise is to create an impression that drives away undecideds who may come in to check out these sites. It helps to do this as a group effort and begin gradually, so the sites appear to be “going downhill slowly.”
 … Really: listen up folks, the way to fight this crap is NOT by “patiently explaining” to people who are already way past being persuaded that the Earth isn’t flat. The way to fight it is by sabotaging the anti-vaxers with crazy stuff that drives away undecideds. The way to fight it is with emotional narratives that undermine the ones that the anti-vaxers are pushing.”

ORAC, run by surgeon David Gorski, is believed by many to be a troll employed by parties interested in the success of vaccines. His tactics certainly support that hypothesis.

Dr. David Gorski
Dr. David Gorski
Another shocking incident of trolling and the utilization of the Internet to subtly influence public opinion has been the recent case of the supposed 12-year old scientist, whose pro-vaxx video went viral on the Internet. To get an idea of what tactics are being used to influence your opinion on vaccines, please watch My Incredible Opinion’s breakdown of the 12-year old scientist hoax.

The “Free Speech” Accusation

One of the most popular arguments brought up by trolls when their comments are removed from a forum or discussion is “HEY! You’re stifling my free speech.”
Really?
Look at it this way. Would you expect a business to allow graffiti on their walls that undermined their efforts? No — because they control that building and they have a right to say what goes on it.
Similarly, when you’re an online content publisher, you control your content. By removing trolling comments that disrupt your efforts to maintain a civilized discussion, you’re not denying anyone free speech in the same way a business removing derogatory graffiti from their walls is not stifling anyone’s right to expression.
Censorship is one of the best ways to deal with Internet trolls. There’s no sense in trying to argue or acknowledge them. Trolls, especially those employed and following a manual as detailed as the one revealed by Snowden, have a clear agenda that they are trained to follow.

Do not feed the trolls!

*Article originally appeared at David Wolfe.

Has Pornified Nudity Really Become Normal?

What is going on with this public nudity craze?
What is going on with this public nudity craze? (Public Domain)
Paris Jackson poses topless on Instragram. Emily Ratajkowski appears in Sports Illustrated wearing only body paint. The 1980s hit television show Twin Peaks is resurrected—this time with the addition of W-rated scenes. Then there is Playboy—the nudes are back!
What is going on with this public nudity craze?
We have come a long way since Janet Jackson's (Paris's aunt) infamous Super Bowl halftime show wardrobe malfunction in 2004. When we look at our pop culture today, one thing becomes clear: Hypersexualized objectifying nudity is everywhere. It has saturated television, movies, gaming, advertising, magazines, news and nearly every aspect of the internet. Has this pornified nudity become normal?
A simple scrolling through the Instagram feeds of our favorite TV reality stars makes the point. We easily find a trove of photos that leave absolutely nothing to the imagination. Kim Kardashian makes a habit of posting nudes. She recently disseminated to millions of fans a naked selfie with the caption "liberated." Really Kim? Are you sure that is liberating? Many other stars post similar selfies. Chrissy Teigen, Katy Perry, Miley Cyrus and Chelsea Handler—just to name a few—make getting naked on social media part of their attention-grabbing, money-making routine. These aren't Playboy centerfold models. And they aren't adult performers in the porn industry. They are celebrities in mainstream media.
Hypersexualized nudity has become a routine thing to see. Super Bowl commercials are basically softcore porn. Carl's Jr. ads are but one more example. Celebs like to make a PR splash with wardrobe malfunctions. And billboards, magazines, advertisements, movies, music videos, television and social media are full of objectifying nudity.
How did this happen?
One reason is because companies like Hugh Hefner's Playboy emerged and grew in extreme popularity over the years. The internet subsequently opened the floodgates to an unrelenting river of porn. The media at large has adopted the same "sex sells" ideology as the porn industry. We've reached a point where if a woman wants to be visible, it's almost imperative that her sexuality be exploited and put on display for the world to consume. Our culture has become pornified.
Playboy's recent back-and-forth over nudity underscores the point. First the iconic adult magazine shockingly removed nude images from its pages, because the editors felt they couldn't compete with internet porn. However, after this short, failed experiment, the much younger Cooper Hefner has replaced his father at the helm of the company. He's setting out to re-brand Playboy for this generation.
The front cover of the May/April 2017 issue has, printed in bold type, the declaration "Naked is Normal." Actually, I agree, it is normal. In the context of a marriage relationship, of course naked is normal. But that is not what we are dealing with in Playboy. There is healthy and harmful sexuality just as there is healthy and harmful food. The objectifying nudity in Playboy is certainly the latter.
Our porn-saturated world has indeed made sexual exploitation and the commodification of the human body something we all have sadly grown accustomed to. We live in a porn culture.
What happens to a society in which the objectified naked female body has become normal?
First, we have to understand that viewing porn does something to the psyche. It isn't a static or stagnant phenomenon that is viewed without any kind of reaction from the mind and body of the viewer. For proof of the potency of visual media on thought and behavior, consider the companies that pay tens of millions of dollars for advertising slots during the Super Bowl alone. McDonald's consistently spends more than 900 million dollars each year on visual media advertising. Why? Because any marketing-savvy company knows that media powerfully affects behavior.
Media influence is a studied and researched force exerted by a media message, resulting in either a measurable change or reinforcement in beliefs and actions. This relationship has been described as the media effect. Immunity from the effects of media simply does not exist.
Professor of sociology and women's studies at Wheelock College, Gail Dines, powerfully said that when people view porn they don't just see a naked body and a sexual encounter.
Dines explained, "What they [people] don't realize is they come away with a lot more. They come away with a worldview, they come away with an ideology, they come away with an identity about who they are, with ideas about what relationships look like, what sex looks like. And the thing about the stories that porn tells is these are the most intimate stories that seep into the very core of who you are."
Dines is referring to stories in which females are merely objects to consume, use, and abuse and in which men are unfeeling, sexually obsessed predators and consumers.
Christians shouldn't be surprised by the fact that viewing pornography changes the way a person thinks and views themselves, others and the world around us. Scripture tells us that by beholding we are changed (see 2 Cor. 3:18). And the beholding principle holds true with pornographic images.
Although we live in a pornified world where, it is encouraging to know that fighting back is becoming normal too. Organizations and people around the world are beginning to take a stand. They are adopting a healthy sexuality and reclaiming the story of what it means to be a man and a woman. Even the infamous self-proclaimed former sex addict Russell Brand, who has admitted to sleeping with nearly 1,000 women, has made educating his followers on the harms of porn a personal mission.
Other celebrities such as Joseph Gordon Levitt, Terry Crews and Pamela Anderson have come out publicly with strong messages about the harms of porn. Anderson, the originator of the sex tape phenomenon and one of porn culture's biggest icons, now says that porn is "a public hazard of unprecedented seriousness" and that we are "a guinea-pig generation for an experiment in mass debasement that few of us would have ever consented to, and whose full nefarious impact may not be known for years."
We know the harms of porn, yet Playboy has transitioned back to nudes. Why? Cooper Hefner tweeted, "Nudity was never the problem because nudity isn't a problem. Today we're taking our identity back and reclaiming who we are."
Well Mr. Hefner, Playboy's nudity is not what should be normal. Today we are taking our identity back and reclaiming who we are, male and female alike. Men are so much more than mindless sexual consumers and predators. Women are so much more than sexual objects—a buffet of flesh to be bought and sold as currency in the market of pop culture acceptance. We are sons and daughters of a King, deserving of respect and dignity, and we are of great value, even with our clothes on.
 Laila Mickelwait is the director of Abolition at Exodus Cry.

WHY DID POPE BENEDICT XVI RESIGN?

That question has been hovering in the background of European geopolitics ever since he did it, and one Italian geopolitician and strategist, Germano Dottori, thinks he has an answer, according to this article shared this week by Mr. G.P.:
An article published recently by an Italian geo-strategist and university professor has again sparked questions concerning the reasons for Pope Benedict XVI’s surprising resignation in 2013. Professor Germano Dottori, a professor at the Institute for Strategic Studies at LUISS-Guido Carli University in … Continue reading Italian Geo-Strategist Fuels Debate Over Pope Benedict’s Resignation
The essence of Signor Dottori's argument is this:
The conflicts between the Church and the United States did not become less, even with the passing of John Paul II. They instead continued during the pontificate of Pope Ratzinger, in the course of which, what exacerbated them was not only the [policy and strategic] investment made by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the political Islam of the Muslim Brotherhood during the so-called Arab Spring, but also the firm desire of Benedict XVI to achieve an historic reconciliation with the Patriarchate of Moscow [under Patriarch Kirill], the true and proper religious coronation of a geopolitical project of Euro-Russian integration, which were in his intentions strongly supported by Germany and also by Silvio Berlusconi’s Italy – but not by that more American-friendly one [Italy], which is to be recognized in Giorgio Napolitano [Italian President, 2006-2015].
How it has come to an end is well-known to everyone. The Italian and papal governments were simultaneously hit by a scandalous, coordinated, and unusually violent and unprecedented campaign, even involving more or less opaque maneuvers in the financial field, with the final effect coming to a head in November 2011 with Berlusconi’s departure from the Palazzo Chigi and, on February 10 [sic – 11], 2013, the abdication of Ratzinger. At the height of the crisis, Italy progressively saw its access to international financial markets closed, while the Institute for Religious Works (IOR) [the Vatican Bank] was temporarily cut out of the Swift 4 circuit.
Note the implied claims:
(1) the Vatican, with Germany's blessing (Ratzinger was, after all, the first German pope in about six hundred years), was pursuing a closer relationship with Eastern Orthodoxy, principally through Patriarch Kiril III;
(2) This was apparently being done in conjunction to create a "Eurasian integration", which apparently was emphasizing the cultural basis of that integration in a common Catholic heritage;
(3) the Vatican and Italy were both hit by "a scandalous, coordinated, and unusually violent and unprecedented campaign," which we may assume is "code" for the pedophilia scandals rocking Ratzinger's pontificate. Dottori is clearly suggesting this emanated from the circles of western power. (At this juncture, one has to pause, and mention another possibility: with the pedophilia scandals erupting around western leaders, and the arrests in this country and others associated with it, that possibility emerges from the fact that, a few years ago, when one said "pedophilia rings" one thought of the Vatican, and, to a lesser extent, other churches. Now, however, there has been an interesting shift of perception, for when one says "pedophilia rings" one thinks of corrupt, and largely secular, western politicians. This may indicate a covert counter-operation emanating from the Vatican.)
(4) This campaign was also coordinated with a campaign to strip the Vatican of its access to international financial markets.
We can recall much corroboration of these suggestions, in that shortly after the beginning of his pontificate, Jorge Cardinal Bergolio (Francis I) began to attempt to clean up(yet again) the operations of the Vatican Bank, even going so far as to appoint the same auditor for it as for the Bank of International Settlements and, reportedly, Lloyd's of London. In short, Bergolio's efforts appear to cave to the pressures being exerted by the West and the USA.
It's that first point, however, that seems to have been much more important than meets the eye:
Here an Italian expert in geo-strategic studies thus claims that both the Italian government under Berlusconi and the papacy of Benedict XVI were toppled due to financial maneuvers that put both states in jeopardy. Alessandro Rico published, on 17 May, an article entitled “Ratzinger costretto ad abdicare dal ricatto di Obama” (“Ratzinger Forced to Abdicate Due to Obama’s Blackmail”) in the Italian newspaper La Verità – a publication which has no inclination toward traditional Catholicism at all, but, rather, sharply rebukes traditional and conservative Catholics in that same 17 May issue (as Giuseppe Nardi points out). Rico himself puts the Dottori statement in context with the 20 January 2017 Open Letter to President Trump, published by the traditional Catholic newspaper The Remnant, which called for an investigation into a possible U.S. intervention against Pope Benedict XVI. As Rico points out, Pope Benedict at the time stood in opposition to President Obama’s collaboration with the Muslim Brotherhood, especially with the pope’s Regensburg address in which he criticized Islamist fundamentalism. The U.S., as Rico along with Dottori explains, was not in favor of a papal rapprochement with the Patriarch of Moscow which could further support a European rapprochement with Russia. A partial basis for this desired rapprochement could also be a rejection of the moral relativism of the West.
When speaking about the financial pressure that was, in 2013, put on the Vatican by excluding the Papal State from the SWIFT system – which interrupted the credit card payments in the Vatican City, and thus in the Vatican museums – Rico also recalls: “Strangely, this [SWIFT] function was re-established immediately after the resignation of Benedict XVI.” (Bold-italics emphasis added)
In other words, American policy was deliberately attempting to forestall the formation of what can only be called a "Christian bloc." If this seems farfetched, one should recall that Russia, prior to the Soviet era, played precisely this role in European and world geopolitics, as the protector of Orthodox Christians. The Vatican exercised this role through proxy states, most recently through Austria-Hungary, Italy, and various other Catholic regional powers.
"OK, so what?" one might think. "Where's the high octane speculation?"
Well, brace yourselves, because it's a whopper: note that the actions taken against the Vatican were (1) a pedophilia scandal and (2) a severing of access to international financial clearing in response to Ratzinger's statements about fundamentalist Islam. (And at this juncture, please recall that Francis I has indicated that Christians do have the right of self-defense against Islamic terrorism, a point often lost in the shuffle). This suggests, as the Russians were similarly affected by threats of exclusion from SWIFT, to the point of developing their own domestic, and ultimately parallel system of international financial clearing, that the Vatican may have been attempting to do an end run around the Western Financial blackmail (denial of service, effectively, to SWIFT), and to gain access to the system(s) being built out by and in Russia. In short, this means the Vatican was attempting to gain access also to the space assets that make international clearing possible.
If this reading of the covert warfare taking place against the Vatican by Mr. Globaloney (and vice versa, if my reading of the pedophilia scandal having moved from the Vatican to western politicians is true), then what one is witnessing is a long-term strategy and goal of the Vatican, which, for the moment may be summarized in the following high octane speculation:
(1) Intermediate goal: Gain access to other systems of financial clearing that are independent of that of the West. For the moment, this means the systems being put into place by Russia and China and, to a lesser extent, existing Japanese capabilities in the Pacific (and for a historical note, do not forget that connection between Japan and the Vatican, via Emperor Hirohito who deposited some of the Golden Lily loot in the Vatican bank, according to Peggy and Sterling Seagraves in Gold Warriors);
(2) Longer term goal: use contacts thus gained to utilize (and perhaps finance) their space launch capacity to launch Vatican-owned communications satellites;
(3) Ultimate goal: build out an independent system of financial clearing by and for the Vatican and any allied churches.
If that high octane speculation is correct, then the USA and the Vatican are engaged in a covert war, just as are the USA and China and the rest of the BRICSA bloc, for those independent financial clearing systems, more than anything else, are a direct challenge to the US dollar reserve currency status.
(And as for the religious "rapprochement", Orthodoxy's position has always been clear, because conceptual/doctrinal content defines Orthodoxy, not institutional boundaries or adherence to supreme authorities claiming infallibility: if there is to be such an arrangement beyond mere ecumenical cooperation, then there must be a full return of Roman Catholicism to that conceptual content, and a jettisoning of all those doctrines added to Orthodoxy on the basis of papal authority alone. While this is not the place to elaborate on this, it is to be noted that the recent statements of Francis I and Kiril III focused, not on doctrinal differences and the departure of the Papacy from that tradition, but rather on areas of common cultural concern. This would seem to indicate that both churches perceive a very serious existential threat, perhaps exhibited by Benedict XVI's remarks about Islamic fundamentalism which led, according to Dottori, to his resignation.)
There's one more implication here: if indeed Ratzinger was forced to resign, i.e., resigned under duress, then a case might be made that the resignation is null and void... and that, of course, would be a scenario that would throw the papal church into a position it has not been in since the middle ages, and it may thus be the "high trump card" the plotters of the coup are holding over Bergolio.
Whatever one makes of these high octane speculations, this is definitely one to watch, because we have not heard the last of this story.                                        https://gizadeathstar.com/2017/06/pope-benedict-xvi-resign/

Jihadi terrorists shouting 'this is for Allah' kill seven in knife frenzy at 'FIVE' locations in the capital

Posted by Conspiracy Cafe on June 4, 2017     ~ hehe hey u's dumb ass's in ENGLAND  ....maybe if u's BAN   knifes ???...Related image


Five men reportedly mowed up to 20 pedestrians down on London Bridge. The knifeman then began stabbing people in the nearby Borough Market. There are unconfirmed reports of gunfire on Southwark Street

The men, described as being 'of Mediterranean origin', reportedly drove the van at 50mph across the bridge

One horrified woman said she saw three people with what appeared to be their throats cut at London Bridge

The gang had metal canisters strapped to their chests and two were reportedly shot dead by armed police

They also tried to storm into pub in nearby Borough Market, where a man was reportedly stabbed five times

Also unconfirmed reports of gunfire on Southwark Street amid the 'utter chaos' of attack on Saturday night

A bomb squad has attended and boats are searching the Thames amid reports people were pushed in water



The bridge is in lock down and the area around it is closed with bus routes being diverted, as armed police and a bomb squad attend the scene and boats search the Thames for bodies - amid reports that people were pushed into the water.

Five jihadi terrorists shouting 'this is for Allah' have reportedly killed seven people and left dozens more injured in a horrific rampage around two locations in central London.

The men, described as being 'of Mediterranean origin', mowed down up to 20 people with a white van at 50mph on London Bridge on Saturday night, then began 'randomly stabbing' revellers with 12-inch hunting knives.

One person has been killed at London Bridge - and one of the casualties is reportedly a police officer. At least 20 people have been taken to six hospitals across London.

The knifemen then smashed into busy pubs and restaurants in the nearby Borough Market and began randomly stabbing revellers. One man was reportedly stabbed five times in the chest.

The gang, with metal canisters strapped to their chests, smashed pub windows and cut the throats of drinkers. A 'dark-skinned' man in a red tracksuit 'calmly' stabbed a man three times, a witness said.

Two suspects were shot dead by a marksman outside the Wheatsheaf pub in Borough Market and one was gunned down and believed to be killed, as the remaining two suspects are on the run.

50 armed police entered Monument station with police dogs and bystanders were told to run. Bank and Monument tube stations have been closed. There are also unconfirmed reports of gunfire on Southwark Street.

LINK:



It's almost funny really. Stage an attack, get people to beg the government to suspend liberties and the election and blame Islam. Britain is the capital of false flag terror to be sure.

This is the funniest part run, hide tell.



When British Army activity on April 7, 1775 suggested the possibility of troop movements, Joseph Warren sent Paul Revere to warn the Massachusetts Provincial Congress, then sitting in Concord, the site of one of the larger caches of Patriot military supplies. After receiving the warning, Concord residents began moving the military supplies away from the town

TO ARMS, TO ARMS THE BRITISH ARE COMING

Imagine if he said run, hide, tell.

Imagine if they said we don't have any arms. 



Training for the one world government police state. Keep drinking. No thinking. 



A terrorist with canisters strapped to his chest was shot by police by Wheatsheaf restuarant in Borough Market (pictured in the foreground). A witness said he was still alive. A second man, believed to be a terrorist, was pictured lying on the ground in the background