Thursday, January 17, 2013

Breaking News | January 17, 2013 |

Sanjay-Gupta-and-Tom-Ridge-warn-about-psychiatric-drugs-in-mass-murders

(Lawrence Hunter) In 2000, New York legislators recognized the ubiquitous and unambiguous connection between violence, especially gun violence and mass murder, and the widespread prescribed use of psychiatric drugs.
Senate Bill 7035 was introduced in the New York State Senate that year requiring police agencies to report to the Department of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS) on certain crimes and suicides committed by a person who is using psychiatric drugs, including assault, homicide, sex offenses, robbery offenses, firearms and other dangerous weapons offenses, kidnapping and arson. The preamble to the bill read, in part:

There is a large body of scientific research establishing a connection between violence and suicide and the use of psychotropic drugs in some cases. This research, which has been published in peer reviewed publications such as the American Journal of Psychiatry, The Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, and The Journal of Forensic Science, has shown, among other things, that: certain drugs can induce mania (a psychosis which can produce bizarre, grandiose and highly elaborated destructive plans, including mass murder);. . .and certain drugs can produce an acute psychotic reaction in an individual not previously psychotic.

The bill died in committee. Since that time, there have been at least 12 additional high-profile mass murders linked to the use of psychiatric drugs, about one a year. And, in virtually every mass school shooting during the past 15 years, the shooter has been on or in withdrawal from psychiatric drugs.
Here is a partial list of 24 such horrific events that occurred since 1998, not including the Virginia Tech shootings and the recent Sandy Hook shootings where the authorities continue to suppress information about whether and to what extent the shooters were on or in withdrawal from a psychiatric drug.
These examples are not unique. According to the Citizens Commission On Human Rights International (CCHR), between 2004 and 2011, there were 12,755 reports to the U.S. FDA’s MedWatch system of psychiatric drugs causing violent side effects including: 1,231 cases of homicidal ideation/homicide, 2,795 cases of mania and 7,250 cases of aggression.
Since the FDA admits that only one to ten percent of all side effects are ever reported to it, the actual occurrence of violent side effects from psychiatric drugs is certainly nine or ten times higher than the official data suggest.
Yet, federal and state governments continue to ignore the connection between psychiatric drugs and murderous violence, preferring instead to exploit these tragedies in an oppressive and unconstitutional power grab to snatch guns away from innocent, law-abiding people who are guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution the right to own and bear arms to deter government tyranny and to use firearms in self defense against any miscreant who would do them harm.
Therefore, it is pharmaceutical makers, not law-abiding gun owners or gun manufacturers, who should be held to account for the series of “lone-wolf,” mass shootings that have occurred since the widespread use of psychiatric drugs began.
Although it is doubtful any single variable can explain what causes someone to commit such unspeakable acts as we saw recently at Sandy Hook, one common denominator surfaces time and time again, in hundreds and hundreds of cases where a “lone wolf” commits violence, murder and mayhem for apparently no reason: Prescribed psychiatric drugs, which are well documented to induce mania, psychosis, violence, suicide and murder, including mass murder for no apparent reason by otherwise non-psychotic people.
Given the mass of supporting data linking psychiatric drug use/withdrawal and violence, and given the fact it has been ignored studiously by the U.S. Congress and federal agencies, it is well past time that Congress and state legislatures and government agencies at all levels formally investigate the well established link between prescribed use of psychiatric drugs, school shootings and similar acts of senseless violence.
This video reveals the indisputable connection between psychiatric drugs and violence, especially young “lone-wolf” shooters in gun massacres.
As psychiatrist Peter Breggin observes in the video:

“One of the things in the past that we’ve known about depression is that it very, very rarely leads to violence. It’s only been since the advent of these new SSRI drugs that we’ve had murderers even mass murders taking these antidepressant drugs.”

Instead of intimidating the NRA into negotiating away Americans’ Second Amendment rights through its seat at the table in Washington, the government should be demanding answers and explanations from PhRMA and the pharmaceutical companies.
Instead of extorting NRA chairman Dave Keene and NRA president Wayne LaPierre into participating with the gun snatchers’ efforts to nullify the Second Amendment in the name of reducing gun violence, why aren’t the White House and Congress putting former Business Roundtable President and current head of PhRMA, John Castellani, along with the presidents of the pharmaceutical companies on the hot seat?
Why isn’t Castellani sitting in on White House and congressional meetings about the connection between his products and mass shootings instead of Keene and LaPierre of the NRA?
Why isn’t there a White House Task Force on the connection between psychiatric drugs and violence, suicide and murder, both gun related and otherwise?
Why aren’t there congressional hearings on the connection between violence and psychiatric drugs?
Why aren’t there bills being introduced in Congress and state legislatures to tighten down on the indiscriminate, unmonitored use of these killer drugs?
Why is the government still suppressing information about the shooters’ psychiatric drug use at Sandy Hook and Virginia Tech?
Why is the government turning America into a police state in the name of protecting us against nonexistent “reefer madness” while it turns a blind eye to the real, deadly med madness created by psychiatric drugs and the uncontrollable violent rages they produce in some people?
Could it be there is a quiet conspiracy afoot among pharmaceutical companies, the government and the gun grabbers to make Mr. and Mrs. Gun Owner of America the patsies for the violence and to blame lone-wolf violence on guns rather than psychiatric drugs?
Could it be that power-hungry politicians and gun snatchers are out to exploit rare tragedies such as Sandy Hook and use the blood of innocent children to scare America into giving up its constitutional rights to own and bear arms and use them as a deterrent against tyranny?
Could it be that big pharma is today’s big tobacco?
Could it be there is an intentional effort underway in the centers of power in Washington, DC to hide the truth from the American people about the strong connection between psychiatric drugs and violence and to protect the pharmaceutical companies from civil and criminal charges for their responsibility in these heinous crimes?
Could that be the explanation for why there continue to be lawsuits against gun manufacturers — not for defects in their products but rather for the misuse of their products by drug-addled individuals — and why there are few lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies for the obvious flaws in their products, which are producing violence and mayhem?
Could it be the Gun Control movement is simply a blind; just an effort by the triple alliance of left-fascists, big-government politicians and big-pharma prescription-drug dealers to dose and oppress the American people in the name of public safety, “officer safety” and social order?
The gun snatchers such as Sen. Dianne Feinstein, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo and New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg all shamefully exploit the bloody murder of children as a pretext to nullify the Second Amendment and short arm the American public with their so-called “assault-weapons” ban and ammunition/clip restrictions. The fact is, the kinds of guns used by mass shooters are far less relevant than the kinds of drugs they were prescribed.

How to Create a Fake “Online Girlfriend”

identity

Jan 17, 2013 12:40 PM

How to Create a Fake “Online Girlfriend”

Kyle Wagner

By now you've heard about Notre Dame star linebacker Mantai Te'o and his fabricated internet girlfriend. There are a lot of reasons and ways that this could have happened. Te'o claims that he was duped and not behind the accounts, but regardless of who is to blame, this was a deep, meticulously planned deception in many respects, and horribly slipshod in others.
So let's play a thought exercise. If you were going to fabricate a fake human on the internet, how would you do it?

Remove All EXIF Data from All Photos of Her

Every photo taken by a modern camera—and yes, that includes your cell phone—contains Exchangeable Image File Format, or EXIF, data. This is metadata that will provide information about when, where, and how the photo was taken. It will typically contain data and time, as well as camera settings, and occasionally copyright info that can be used to determine what type of camera was used. EXIF can also contain geotagged information, which will display where the photo was taken using your phone or camera's GPS data.
You can remove the EXIF data in photoshop by simply loading the photo in, selecting Save for Web, and setting Metadata to None. There you go, all done: Any photo of her will be untraceable. That said, for anyone bothering to dig up dirt, the total lack of EXIF data on all your photos will be a HUGE red flag. It's a problem, but at least you can fall back on "I value my privacy," or some story like that.

Do Not Give Her a Real Person's Identity

This should be obvious, since word will always reach back to the original person, but it can be tempting because a real identity will stand up to more advanced vetting. They'll exist in registrars and in hospital records and government records. And if you simply refer to vague background details, and distance the social media accounts enough, it seems like it can work. But it just adds one more variable to what's already going to be a volatile house of cards. Any thorough inspection into either a real person's stolen identity or a made up one will probably crack your scheme, so there's no need to introduce another variable.

Create as Much History as Possible

This is easier if family and friends are complicit in your fake identity, as you'll be able to create something resembling a real online history. Facebook's Timeline and photo backdating feature will help here, since you can edit any Timeline event or photo to appear as though it was posted at ANY TIME YOU CHOOSE. This is intended to be used for you to create a comprehensive life-long scrapbook, but it's just as easy (and more likely) to use it as a means to create a fake narrative—whether about being at some RAD concert, or being at a bar with some friends instead of cheating on your poor girlfriend who lives with you. Or if you're creating a person out of thin air.
You're on your own for Twitter and Instagram, though, so you'll probably want some lead time to flesh out those accounts. You'll need alibis to interact with them, and hopefully cross-post enough that it seems like your Canadian girlfriend actually has a life, and doesn't totally exist in a vacuum.

Images of Her CANNOT Be Searchable

The first and easiest way to get caught making someone up is to use a photo that's available on the web—anywhere on the web. No matter how deep you dig, Google's web crawlers dig deeper. Anyone can upload an image or drop a link into Google Image Search and Mountain View's electronic hoards will search for similar-looking photos. It was one of the key ways that Te'o got busted.
So you're either going to need to rely on a cache of photos of a human that you know for a fact that have never been on the internet, or have a partner in crime to pose for them.

Never Refer to Public Meetings. Certainly Don't Fake Them

The surest way to retain plausible deniability is to never, ever claim to have met up. There's just no upside, unless you're trying to convince your high school friends that you've actually had sex with a girl from the next town over, in which case you can't really get around that. But for basically literally absolutely any other reason you might have to fake the existence of a human being, just don't do it, it's not worth it. It's the difference between having a chance to bail out and claim a "hacker" deceived you and having zero buffer on your gigantic, absurd lie.

Make Her Public-Facing Online Name an Obvious Pseudonym

This is sort of a double-reverse, but you want to put as much distance between the online, public identity and any kind of legitimate background check. To use Te'o's case, "Lennay Kay" was a decent front for "Lennay Kekua," and a reasonable thing a person might go by online. People use all kinds of pseudonyms to make themselves harder to search for, so why not your imaginary girlfriend? It's a perfect cover for making your fake human a pain in the ass to find. http://gizmodo.com/5976624/how-to-create-a-fake-online-girlfriend

Guns, Gun Control, Abortion, Children

Obama the Children Savior Champion of Partial Birth Abortion

- Judi McLeod (Bio and Archives) Thursday, January 17, 2013

The White House spokesman Jay Carney-identified “little kids”, filling in as props at Barack Hussein Obama’s gun proposal presser today, have more respect for human life than the president does.

Young as they are, those with baby brothers and sisters at home, would be absolutely traumatized to know that as a senator Obama championed partial birth abortion, the brutal slaughter of babies who make it through abortion.
“President Obama voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act four times, horrifyingly voting against protecting babies who survived abortion and voting in favor of leaving them to die. (LifeNews).
While the children props of today would never have known, it was the same Obama standing among them, eliciting chuckles and laugher when reading out some of their letters in what must be the most hypocritical bid of all time to champion the lives of children.

The children, figuratively used as human shields in today’s White House photo op wouldn’t know that on his third day in office, President Obama repealed the pro-life “Mexico City Policy” and that by doing this he made groups that perform and promote abortion eligible for U.S. foreign aid funds from American taxpayers, including their parents.
How many of the children surrounding Obama today know that Planned Parenthood’s funding jumped from 33% to nearly 50%—over $487 million in taxpayer funding now goes to the abortion giant (under Obama and his administration)? This is almost half a billion dollars that American families are forced to pay in tax dollars—no matter how hard they struggle in the current economy—to the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.
The smiles of the children used by Obama today and the beaming with pride ones of their parents would fade if they contemplated what Obama did to the soldiers who risk their lives to protect citizens in foreign countries, putting them in further harms way to get more funding to Planned Parenthood. In fact, Obama refused to sign an emergency budget, putting military funding at risk—until Planned Parenthood funding was in the budget. This was following Live Action’s Sex Trafficking investigation, showing Planned Parenthood aiding and abetting the sex-traffickers of underage girls.
“The president has pushed for his “pet legislation,” The Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare), which would help fund “community health centers” (Planned Parenthood is their prime target). Additionally, the HHS mandate would force all Americans to fund abortion and contraception, with no exceptions for religious institutions or religious individuals who are vehemently against abortion and contraception.” [Live Action News]
The children props of today won’t know until they grow up that Mrs. Obama termed any attempts to stop partial birth abortions as a reprehensible crux of conservatism as seen in the first line of the fundraising letter she sent out on behalf of her husband:

“We have all been concerned lately with the rise of conservatism in this country, especially as it relates to women. You’ve read the alarming news about the Justice Department’s request for hospitals to turn over the private medical records of dozens of patients. This cynical ploy is designed to intimidate a group of physicians and force them to drop their lawsuit seeking to have the so-called partial birth abortion ban ruled unconstitutional.
“The fact remains, with no provision to protect the health of the mother, this ban on a legitimate medical procedure is clearly unconstitutional and must be overturned. [Emphasis added]”

Someone should be noting that the children who surrounded Obama today are the blessed ones; the ones whose lives were not snuffed by abortion.
Primary in Obama’s gun proposals today was his deputizing of family doctors who will be asked to rat on gun owners.
Do today’s children know that ratting on their parents is what’s coming next on school curriculum in Obama’s Marxist world?
In using little kids to introduce his gun proposal, the propaganda of Obama’s message is he’s “doing it for the children”. But stepping up to the plate as the ‘Patron Saint of Little Children’ is a rebuke because he has easily owned, ever since his Senator days, the title “Father of Partial Birth Abortion’.
Some day, perhaps not tomorrow or the next day, the parents of the school children used as props when Obama unveiled his gun proposal allowed their kids to star in the most horrible fairytale of all time.

Copyright © Canada Free Press
RSS Feed for Judi McLeod
Judi McLeod is an award-winning journalist with 30 years’ experience in the print media. A former Toronto Sun columnist, she also worked for the Kingston Whig Standard. Her work has appeared on Rush Limbaugh, Newsmax.com, Drudge Report, Foxnews.com, and Glenn Beck. http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52445
Judi can be emailed at: judi@canadafreepress.com
Older articles by Judi McLeod

The mainstream media has failed us and we only hope the courts will not fail us

Obama Could Not Pass a Background Check

- Alan Caruba (Bio and Archives) Thursday, January 17, 2013

President Barack Obama could not pass a background check if he was applying for a gun permit or a job. Why has this man been allowed to remain in office or take the oath for a second time?

During the 2008 campaign, it was known that:

His official, long form birth records were SEALED.
His Occidental College records were SEALED.
His Columbia College records were SEALED.
His Harvard College records were SEALED.
His College thesis – SEALED.
His Harvard Law Review articles – SEALED.
His Indonesian adoption records – SEALED.
His passport file – SEALED.
His medical records – Unavailable
His baptism records – Unavailable
His papers from his service in the Illinois legislature – Unavailable
His Illinois State Bar Association records - Unavailable

The birth certificate that the White House released is reputed by document experts to be false.
The Social Security number he has used was issued to someone else. He could not pass an E-Verify test. The first three numbers of his Social Security ID are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049. The number was issued between 1977 and 1979. Obama’s earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins in Oahu, Hawaii.
Many of the “facts” he cited in his two memoirs have turned out to be questionable, if not outright lies; particularly as regards his birth father, a citizen of Kenya at the time of his birth.
A job applicant with Obama’s paper trail would not even pass the smell test, but this man was elected and reelected. The role of journalism is to vet the credentials of anyone running for public office, let alone the highest office in the land. Instead, he has been protected against all inquiries and those making them have been called “birthers” or simply ignored.
Obama so routinely lies that keeping track of them would require a team of full-time archivists.
In August 2009 he said, “I have not said I was a single-payer supporter”, but in June 2003, as an Illinois state senator, he said, “I happen to be a proponent of a single-payer universal health care system.”
In March 2006, he said “Leadership means the buck stops here…I therefore intend to oppose the effort to increase America’s debt limit.” He is now into his second political battle to raise the debt limit. In July 2011, he said “It is not acceptable for us not to raise the debt ceiling and to allow the U.S. government to default.”
In response to a 1996 questionnaire he said “I favor legalizing same-sex marriages and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages, but in November 2008 he said, “I believe that marriage is between a man and a woman. I am not in favor of gay marriage.”
He spent his first term blaming the nation’s economic ills on his predecessor, George W. Bush, saying in July 2008, that “he added $4 trillion by his lonesome, so that we now have over $9 trillion in debt that we are going to have to pay back. That’s irresponsible. It’s unpatriotic.” Today, the debt stands at more than $16 trillion because Obama added more to the debt than all previous presidents combined. For the first time in U.S. history, our credit rating was reduced and rating services are warning they will reduce it again.
He has a record of using executive orders to bypass the constitutional powers and duties of Congress. His most recent effort was 23 such orders regarding gun control at the same time Americans are buying guns as fast as they can, fearing the loss of the right to own and bear arms. This is the same President who just signed a law granting him and his family lifetime Secret Service protection.
He used “executive privilege” to cover-up the “Fast and Furious” scandal in which guns were allowed to be purchased and transported for use by Mexican drug cartel members.
He lied about the attack in Benghazi, Libya that killed a U.S. ambassador and encouraged members of his staff to spread the lie that it was “spontaneous” and the result of a video no one has seen.
He and the Democratic Party imposed “Obamacare” on the nation and its passage is already undermining the provision of healthcare services, driving up the cost of health insurance, and causing physicians and the providers of testing and other services to leave the profession and close their doors.
He no longer can blame President Bush, so now he blames the Republican Party that has offered solutions to the nation’s economic crisis that has worsened every day he has been in office. His foreign policy has consisted of apologizing for America and standing aside while one nation after another in the Middle East and northern Africa has fallen under the control of Islamist radicals. He is doing nothing to avoid the sequestration cuts that would harm national defense and a range of other government functions.
He has failed us. Congress has failed us.
It has taken four years for a case challenging his right to hold office and the Supreme Court has scheduled a “conference” in February that might decide to ignore a current case.
The mainstream media has failed us and we only hope the courts will not fail us.
He should not be administered the oath of office for a second time.
© Alan Caruba, 2013

Alan has a daily blog called Warning Signs.
Alan can be reached at acaruba@aol.com http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/52478
Older articles by Alan Caruba

25 Signs That The Nazification Of America Is Almost Complete

The United States of America is becoming more like Nazi Germany every single day. In fact, the Nazification of America is almost complete. The parallels between Nazi Germany and the United States of today are going to absolutely shock many of you. Most Americans simply have never learned what life was really like back in Nazi Germany. Under Adolf Hitler, Germany was a Big Brother totalitarian police state that ruthlessly repressed freedom and individual liberty. Under Adolf Hitler, Germany adopted socialism, dramatically increased government spending and raised taxes to astronomical levels. Under Adolf Hitler, abortion became legal in Germany, the government took over health care and Christianity was pushed out of the public schools and out of public life. To prove all of these points, I am going to use extensive quotes from two sources. Kitty Werthmann was a child living a peaceful life in Austria when Hitler took over her nation. Her eyewitness accounts about what life was like under Nazi Germany are invaluable. In addition, I will also be quoting extensively from author Bruce Walker. He is the author of a book entitled “The Swastika Against The Cross: The Nazi War On Christianity”, and during his years of research he has uncovered some absolutely jaw dropping stuff. After reading the information in the rest of this article, there should be no doubt that the United States is becoming just like Nazi Germany. Nazi Germany shows us what happens when the state becomes god. Adolf Hitler was certainly more racist than the leaders of America are today, but other than that there are very few differences between the road that Adolf Hitler led Germany down and the path that the United States is being led down.
The following are 25 signs that the Nazification of America is almost complete….
#1 Nazi Germany was a totalitarian Big Brother police state that constantly monitored everything that German citizens did.
Today, the bureaucrats that run things in the United States are also absolutely obsessed with constantly trying to monitor us. For example, there are now control freaks that inspect the lunches of preschool students in certain areas of the country in order to make sure that they contain the “right” foods….

A preschooler at West Hoke Elementary School ate three chicken nuggets for lunch Jan. 30 because the school told her the lunch her mother packed was not nutritious.
The girl’s turkey and cheese sandwich, banana, potato chips, and apple juice did not meet U.S. Department of Agriculture guidelines, according to the interpretation of the person who was inspecting all lunch boxes in the More at Four classroom that day.
The Division of Child Development and Early Education at the Department of Health and Human Services requires all lunches served in pre-kindergarten programs – including in-home day care centers – to meet USDA guidelines. That means lunches must consist of one serving of meat, one serving of milk, one serving of grain, and two servings of fruit or vegetables, even if the lunches are brought from home.

#2 Nazi officials often used their positions of power to force others to do dehumanizing things.
This is exactly what the TSA is doing today. It would be really easy to imagine some Nazi military officers forcing a young woman to walk back and forth in front of them several times so that they could admire her form. Well, that is what TSA agents are doing to American women today. The following comes from a recent Wired article….

TSA agents in Dallas singled out female passengers to undergo screening in a body scanner, according to complaints filed by several women who said they felt the screeners intentionally targeted them to view their bodies.
One woman who flew out of Dallas-Ft. Worth International Airport several months ago said a female agent sent her through a body scanner three times after the agent commented on her “cute” body.

#3 In Nazi Germany, even women and children were treated like dehumanized cattle.
Well, today schoolchildren are being strip-searched all over the United States. Down in Georgia, one student was recently strip-searched by public school officials after another student falsely accused him of having marijuana.
Another student down in Albuquerque was recently forced to strip down to his underwear while five adults watched because he had $200 in his pocket. The student was never formally charged with doing anything wrong.
#4 In Nazi Germany, authorities could stop you and search you at any time and for any reason.
In America that is not supposed to happen, but it is happening. Last year, TSA “VIPR teams” conducted approximately 8,000 “unannounced security screenings” at subway stations, bus terminals, seaports and highway rest stops.
If you are not able to produce “your papers”, there is a good chance that you will get thrown into prison in America. For example, a 21-year-old college student named Samantha Zucker was recently arrested and put in a New York City jail for 36 hours just because she could not produce any identification for police.
#5 Under Adolf Hitler, there were massive increases in government spending.
According to eyewitness Kitty Werthmann, just about everyone was getting some sort of a handout from the German government….

Newlyweds immediately received a $1,000 loan from the government to establish a household. We had big programs for families. All day care and education were free. High schools were taken over by the government and college tuition was subsidized. Everyone was entitled to free handouts, such as food stamps, clothing, and housing.

Of course, as I have written about so many times before, this is the exact same thing that we are seeing in the United States today.
#6 Under Hitler, taxes were raised dramatically in order to pay for all of these social programs.
Kitty Werthmann says that “our tax rates went up to 80% of our income.”
In the United States our tax rates have not gotten that bad yet, but when you total up all federal taxes, all state taxes, all local taxes, all property taxes and all sales taxes, there are a significant number of Americans that do pay more than 50% of their incomes in taxes.
#7 The economy of Nazi Germany was very highly socialized.
As Ludwig Von Mises once correctly observed, the German economy under Hitler was not capitalist at all….

What Mises identified was that private ownership of the means of production existed in name only under the Nazis and that the actual substance of ownership of the means of production resided in the German government. For it was the German government and not the nominal private owners that exercised all of the substantive powers of ownership: it, not the nominal private owners, decided what was to be produced, in what quantity, by what methods, and to whom it was to be distributed, as well as what prices would be charged and what wages would be paid, and what dividends or other income the nominal private owners would be permitted to receive. The position of the alleged private owners, Mises showed, was reduced essentially to that of government pensioners.

The United States has not gotten to the level of Nazi Germany yet, but we do have a socialist president and back in 2009 the cover of Newsweek boldly proclaimed that “We Are All Socialists Now“.
#8 In Nazi Germany, if you conducted business outside of the socialist paradigm you were heavily punished.
Well, the same thing is happening in the United States today. For example, the FDA has been runningelaborate entrapment schemes that are designed to entrap producers of raw milk. Any “unauthorized commerce” is dealt with very strictly by the U.S. government these days.
#9 In Nazi Germany, government regulation of business got wildly out of control.
The following is eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

My brother-in-law owned a restaurant that had square tables. Government officials told him he had to replace them with round tables because people might bump themselves on the corners. Then they said he had to have additional bathroom facilities. It was just a small dairy business with a snack bar. He couldn’t meet all the demands. Soon, he went out of business.
If the government owned the large businesses and not many small ones existed, it could be in control.
We had consumer protection. We were told how to shop and what to buy. Free enterprise was essentially abolished. We had a planning agency specially designed for farmers. The agents would go to the farms, count the live-stock, then tell the farmers what to produce, and how to produce it.

Of course we all know about all of the ridiculous regulations that the U.S. government is burdening businesses with today. In every day and age control freaks love to stick it to business people that are just trying to make a living.
#10 Under Hitler, free market capitalism was absolutely hated.
National Socialist theologian Gregor Strasser once stated the following….

We National Socialists are enemies, deadly enemies, of the present capitalist system with its exploitation of the economically weak … and we are resolved under all circumstances to destroy this system.

And as I have written about previously, a lot of Barack Obama’s strongest supporters are socialists and communists, and an increasing number of Americans are showing disdain for capitalism. In fact, some recent polls show that young adults in America actually have a more favorable view of socialism than they do of capitalism.
#11 In Nazi Germany, the health care system was taken over by the government.
The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

Before Hitler, we had very good medical care. Many American doctors trained at the University of Vienna . After Hitler, health care was socialized, free for everyone. Doctors were salaried by the government. The problem was, since it was free, the people were going to the doctors for everything. When the good doctor arrived at his office at 8 a.m., 40 people were already waiting and, at the same time, the hospitals were full. If you needed elective surgery, you had to wait a year or two for your turn. There was no money for research as it was poured into socialized medicine. Research at the medical schools literally stopped, so the best doctors left Austria and emigrated to other countries.

Of course we all know what is going on in America today. The government spends nearly half of all health care dollars and Obamacare is going to mean more government control over the health care system than ever before.
#12 Under Adolf Hitler, abortion was made “safe and legal” in Germany.
It turns out that Hitler was a huge fan of the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger. And as I wrote about recently, it was Sanger that once said the following….

“The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

Hitler echoed this sentiment when he wrote the following in Mein Kampf….

“The demand that defective people be prevented from propagating equally defective offspring. . . represents the most humane act of mankind.”

After the Nazis came to power in 1933, abortion was very quickly legalized. By 1935 there were approximately 500,000 abortions being performed in Germany every single year.
Yes, Hitler very much encouraged Aryan women to have as many children as possible. But he also very much viewed abortion as a way to reduce “undesirable” populations.
Unfortunately, something very similar is happening today. Abortion clinics are often located in the “poor” part of town, and a staggering 72 percent of Planned Parenthood’s “customers” have incomes that are either equal to or beneath 150 percent of the federal poverty level.
#13 In Nazi Germany, killing the “defective”, the “weak” and the “disabled” was considered to be a good thing because it made the German people “stronger”.
Unfortunately, many in America today have fully embraced the eugenics principles which were so dominant in Nazi Germany.
A 3 year old girl named Amelia was recently denied a kidney transplant because she is considered to be “mentally retarded”, and we all remember what happened to Terri Schiavo.
Not only that, the editorial page editor of the Detroit News recently proposed putting contraceptives into the drinking water in Michigan because the state has become a “breeding ground for poverty“.
This kind of sick thinking is rapidly spreading in America, and that is a very frightening thing.
#14 In Nazi Germany, education was nationalized and God was kicked out of the schools.
The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

Our education was nationalized. I attended a very good public school. The population was predominantly Catholic, so we had religion in our schools. The day we elected Hitler (March 13, 1938), I walked into my schoolroom to find the crucifix replaced by Hitler’s picture hanging next to a Nazi flag. Our teacher, a very devout woman, stood up and told the class we wouldn’t pray or have religion anymore. Instead, we sang Deutschland, Deutschland, Uber Alles, and had physical education.

Unfortunately, the exact same thing is happening to U.S. public schools.
#15 Under Adolf Hitler, God was mocked and religion was pushed out of every corner of public life.
Just check out the following information uncovered by author Bruce Walker….

The Nazi tract Gott und Volk was distributed in 1941, and it describes the life cycle of German youth in the future, who would: “With parties and gifts the youth will be led painlessly from one faith to the other and will grow up without ever having heard of the Sermon on the Mount or the Golden Rule, to say nothing of the Ten Commandments… The education of the youth is to be confined primarily by the teacher, the officer, and the leaders of the party. The priests will die out. They have estranged the youth from the Volk. Into their places will step the leaders. Not deputies of God. But anyway the best Germans. And how shall we train our children? Thus, as though they had never heard of Christianity!”

Once again, this parallels what we are seeing happen in America today. Last year, a high school student in Southern California was suspended for two days because he had private conversations with his classmates during which he discussed Christianity. He was also banned from bringing his Bible to school ever again.
For many more examples of this phenomenon, please see this article: “18 Examples Of How Christians Are Being Specifically Targeted By Big Brother“.
#16 Adolf Hitler fully embraced the theory of evolution, and Darwinism provided the intellectual foundation for much of Nazism.
At a Nazi Party rally in Nuremberg in 1933, Hitler declared that “higher race subjects to itself a lower race . . .a right which we see in nature and which can be regarded as the sole conceivable right“.
Hitler was obsessed with the “survival of the fittest” and he took this theory to its logical extremes. The following is how one author put it….

“Hitler was influenced above all by the theories of the nineteenth-century social Darwinist school, whose conception of man as biological material was bound up with impulses towards a planned society. He was convinced that the race was disintegrating, deteriorating through faulty breeding as a result of a liberally tinged promiscuity that was vitiating the nation’s blood. And this led to the establishment of a catalogue of ‘positive’ curative measures: racial hygiene, eugenic choice of marriage partners, the breeding of human beings by the methods of selection on the one hand and extirpation on the other”

But of course we have no problem with teaching this flawed theory to our children in the public schools of America today.
Haven’t we learned anything from history?
#17 Under Adolf Hitler, the state started taking over the job of child care.
The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

When the mothers had to go out into the work force, the government immediately established child care centers. You could take your children ages 4 weeks to school age and leave them there around-the-clock, 7 days a week, under the total care of the government. The state raised a whole generation of children. There were no motherly women to take care of the children, just people highly trained in child psychology.

Of course this is exactly what is happening in America today. Children are raised by day care centers and public schools, and most parents spend very little time with their own children.
#18 In Nazi Germany, it became fashionable to mock Christians and the Christian faith.
The following is more from author Bruce Walker….

By 1935, the virulently anti-Christian leader of the Hitler Youth, Baldur von Shirach issued a regulation that prohibited any child from belonging simultaneously to a church youth group and the Hitler Youth, and gradually membership in the Hitler Youth became almost obligatory – parents were told that their children would not get jobs in the civil service unless they belonged to the Hitler Youth and employers were told not to hire children who did not belong to the Hitler Youth. Christian schoolchildren who did not belong to the Hitler Youth or its female counterpart were routinely beaten up by young Nazi thugs.
Boys inducted into the Hitler Youth were required to explicitly reject Christianity by oaths like this: “German blood and Christian baptismal water are completely incompatible.” At Hitler Youth center at Halle, was the following prominent statement: “The Faith fanatics, who still to-day slide down on their knees with faces uplifted to heaven, waste their time in churchgoing and prayers, and have not yet understood that they are living on the earth and that therefore their task is of a thoroughly earthly kind. All we Hitler people can still only look with the greatest contempt on those young people who still run to their silly Evangelical or Catholic Churches in order to vent their quite superstitious religious feelings.”

Those that believe that the Nazis embraced Christianity are delusional. The following are direct quotes out of Hitler Youth training manuals….
“Christianity is a religion of slaves and fools.”
“How did Christ die? Whining at the Cross!”
“The Ten Commandments represent the lowest instincts of man.”
“Christianity is merely a cloak for Judaism.”
This is definitely where things are going in America today. Our television shows and our movies regularly mock Christians and they are always portrayed as the “bad guys”.
In addition, the name of Jesus is rapidly becoming a forbidden word. Some U.S. courts have even ruled that it is unconstitutional to use the name of “Jesus Christ” during any official government meeting. The following comes from a recent WorldNetDaily article….

But the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State are standing by their victory in a U.S. circuit court decision that states even “a solitary reference to Jesus Christ” in invocations before the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners’ meetings could do “violence to the pluralistic and inclusive values that are a defining feature of American public life.”

#19 Under Adolf Hitler, sexual promiscuity was actually encouraged.
The following is more eyewitness testimony from Kitty Werthmann….

My mother was very unhappy. When the next term started, she took me out of public school and put me in a convent. I told her she couldn’t do that and she told me that someday when I grew up, I would be grateful. There was a very good curriculum, but hardly any fun no sports, and no political indoctrination. I hated it at first but felt I could tolerate it. Every once in a while, on holidays, I went home. I would go back to my old friends and ask what was going on and what they were doing. Their loose lifestyle was very alarming to me. They lived without religion. By that time unwed mothers were glorified for having a baby for Hitler. It seemed strange to me that our society changed so suddenly. As time went along, I realized what a great deed my mother did so that I wasn’t exposed to that kind of humanistic philosophy.

Of course the exact same thing is happening in America today. If you doubt that your tax dollars are going to promote sexual promiscuity, then I have a video for you to watch. It is a video from the American Life League, and you can view it right here. DO NOT let any children watch this video. It is done by a pro-life organization but it is very graphic. I have posted a link to it because it is imperativethat parents understand what is really going on out there. But please be warned that it is very, very graphic.
#20 Once the Nazis too power, they rapidly implemented gun control legislation and later on they took all of the guns away from the populace.
Kitty Werthmann remembers very well what happened in Austria under the Nazis….

Next came gun registration. People were getting injured by guns. Hitler said that the real way to catch criminals (we still had a few) was by matching serial numbers on guns. Most citizens were law abiding and dutifully marched to the police station to register their firearms. Not long after-wards, the police said that it was best for everyone to turn in their guns. The authorities already knew who had them, so it was futile not to comply voluntarily.

Last year, more than 10 million guns were sold in the United States, but gun control legislation continues to become even more strict, and it is only a matter of time before the federal government tries to disarm the U.S. population completely.
#21 Under the Nazis, large numbers of children were taken away from good families.
The following is more from author Bruce Walker….

Parents who resisted Nazi anti-Christian indoctrination too strongly simply had their children taken away from them. The Nazis even forbade parents to give their children Christian names and ordered babies instead to be given names like Dietrich, Otto or Siegfried. The home teaching of Christianity by parents in the home was forbidden. Not content with simply driving Christianity out of public schools, Himmler banned all Confessing Church seminaries and instruction in 1937 and he closed all private religious schools two years later.

Doesn’t this sound exactly like where America is headed?
In many states, CPS (“child protective services”) has become one of the most feared government agencies. All over the nation, thousands upon thousands of children have been removed from good homes because the parents were not raising them “correctly”.
You can read about one particularly bad CPS horror story right here.
#22 Under Adolf Hitler, society became very highly militarized.
Of course we are seeing the same thing in the U.S. right now.
Sadly, this is even happening to our public schools. According to blogger Alexander Higgins, students in kindergarten and the 1st grade in the state of New Jersey are now required by law to participate “in monthly anti-terrorism drills”. The following is an excerpt from a letter that he recently received from the school where his child attends….

Each month a school must conduct one fire drill and one security drill which may be a lockdown, bomb threat, evacuation, active shooter, or shelter-in place drill. All schools are now required by law to implement this procedure.

This is the kind of thing that a sicko like Adolf Hitler would try to do, and it is not good for our children.
#23 In Nazi Germany, the prisons were absolutely packed.
Right now, the United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world by far and the largest total prison population on the entire globe by far.
Even children are being arrested in alarming numbers. In a previous article, I described how one 12-year-old girl down in Texas was recently arrested for spraying herself with perfume and how police were recently sent out to collect an overdue library book from a 5-year-old girl in Massachusetts.
#24 Under Adolf Hitler, there was basically no freedom of speech.
In the United States today we are told that we still have freedom of speech, but that freedom is being “chilled” in thousands of different ways.
For example, the FBI is now admittedly recording Internet talk radio programs all over the United States. The following comes from a recent article by Mark Weaver of WMAL.com….

If you call a radio talk show and get on the air, you might be recorded by the FBI.
The FBI has awarded a $524,927 contract to a Virginia company to record as much radio news and talk programming as it can find on the Internet.
The FBI says it is not playing big brother by policing the airwaves, but rather seeking access to what airs as potential evidence.

So please speak freely on talk radio. Just realize that the feds will be recording every single word.
#25 Under Adolf Hitler, paranoia was standard operating procedure.
In Nazi Germany, every citizen was a potential threat and everyone had to be constantly watched for suspicious activity.
Of course the exact same thing is happening in America today. Just about anything you do can get you labeled as a “potential terrorist” by the government.
According to a new DHS report, the following are some of the beliefs and ideologies of potential terrorists….
-”fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)”
-”anti-global”
-”suspicious of centralized federal authority”
-”reverent of individual liberty”
-”believe in conspiracy theories”
-”a belief that one’s personal and/or national “way of life” is under attack”
-”a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism”
-”impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)”
-”insert religion into the political sphere”
-”those who seek to politicize religion”
-”supported political movements for autonomy”
-”anti-abortion”
-”anti-Catholic”
-”anti-nuclear”
And the definition of “suspicious activity” has become so broad in America that it pretty much covers 100% of us. In 2012, the following activities are considered to be “suspicious” by the FBI….
-shielding your computer screen from others
-paying with cash
-acting “nervous”
-using multiple cell phones
-requesting a specific room at a hotel
-traveling with a large amount of luggage
-refusing maid service at a hotel
-staying in your room for too long
-changing your appearance
In addition, the U.S. government has decided that it would be a really good idea for all of us to spy on one another. The “If You See Something, Say Something” campaign looks like it could have been pulled right out of a Gestapo security handbook.
But America is not supposed to be about spying on one another and reporting each other to the secret police.
America is supposed to be about liberty and freedom.
Recently, Fox News made a really bad decision by cancelling Freedom Watch. Judge Andrew Napolitano was one of the few voices on television that was still standing up for individual liberty.
As we think about how the Nazification of America has progressed, let the things that Judge Napolitano said on his last show echo in our minds. Video from that show is posted below….

H.R. 226: Plan is “to reduce the number of privately owned weapons”

Posted on January 17, 2013 by willyloman

by Scott Creighton
Sometimes they inadvertently slip and tell you what the overall agenda really is and if you’re paying attention, if you might just be a conspiracy theorist or something, you catch ‘em.
This is not about keeping the “crazy” people from owning weapons or the “wrong” people. It’s not about getting these military style weapons off the streets either. It’s about reducing the number of privately owned weapons in this country by any means necessarily.
And then it’s also about adding another half trillion dollars to the deficit monster which will have to be paid by further cuts to social spending. You see, it’s a “win win“ (full text of the H.R. 226 after the break at the end of the article)

Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3] and bill co-sponsor Rep. Grijalva, Raul M. [D-AZ-3]* introduced House Bill 226 on 01/14/2013 which basically laid out a plan to have law abiding U.S. citizens “surrender” their legally owned firearms in exchange for a $2,000 tax credit spread out over 2 years ($1,000 per year)
The bill includes a list of the kinds of “assault rifles” they are going to offer the 2 grand for, which is interesting because it also includes things like various sniper rifles, a Spaz12 shotgun (tactical shotgun) and any semi-auto rifle with a detachable magazine and a threaded barrel which is pretty much any decent rifle these days. Surely the list of weapons included on this list will expand as this bill works it’s way through congress.
But what’s really interesting about this bill is the language included in Sec. 25E (a)(1)

``SEC. 25E. ASSAULT WEAPON TURN-IN CREDIT.

    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of an individual who 
        surrenders a specified assault weapon to the United States or a 
        State or local government (or political subdivision thereof) as 
        part of a Federal, State, or local public safety program to 
        reduce the number of privately owned weapons, on the election 
        of the taxpayer there shall be allowed as a credit against the 
        tax imposed by this chapter an amount equal to $2,000.

That’s pretty straight forward folks. It’s right there on the government website.
They don’t care about keeping guns out of the hands of the “crazy” conspiracy theorists or the criminals as this law won’t payout those tax credits for guns that aren’t legally registered to the person who surrenders them.
This bill is about paying citizens $1,000 a year for two years if they turn in their legally owned firearms.
It’s about reducing the number of weapons in private hands. Period.
Below is the bill in it’s entirety.
Also think about this: the one to two hundred million guns out there that might fall into this category would cost between 200 billion and half a trillion to collect by the government. Last I checked they are already looking to cut spending because of the dreaded deficit monster.
So where is that money going to come from?
They will float this out there and claim they have to pay for it somehow, and it will be used to demolish even more of the social safety net in the country. Social programs will have to be sacrificed on the alter of the “greater good”
While we are talking about it, let’s talk about this as well: what do you think is going to happen to all of these military grade weapons once the government which ran Operation Gun Runner and Fast and Furious? The government that is currently arming various terrorist groups in countries across the globe for their own interests?
Do you really think they are going to destroy these things or do you think there will be this built-in smoke screen to divert these weapons to places like those 35 countries in Africa where we just sent our military advisers?
What is going to happen to these 100 million or so military grade weapons that the poor and unfortunate Americans are ultimately going to end up paying for?
—–

H.R.226 – Support Assault Firearms Elimination and Reduction for our Streets Act113th Congress (2013-2014)

Overview: House Bill

Sponsor:	Rep. DeLauro, Rosa L. [D-CT-3] (Introduced 01/14/2013)
Cosponsors:	1
Latest Action:	01/14/2013 Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Major Recorded Votes:	There are no Roll Call votes for this bill

Status of Legislation:

This bill has the status {.Here are the steps for Status of Legislation:

Introduced
Passed House
Passed Senate
To President
Became Law

Text: H.R.226 [113th]

There is one version of the bill.

Bill text available as:

Shown Here:
Introduced in House (01/13/2013)

[Congressional Bills 113th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office]
[H.R. 226 Introduced in House (IH)]

113th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 226

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
      tax for surrendering to authorities certain assault weapons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2013

  Ms. DeLauro (for herself and Mr. Grijalva) introduced the following 
      bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against 
      tax for surrendering to authorities certain assault weapons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Support Assault Firearms Elimination 
and Reduction for our Streets Act''.

SEC. 2. ASSAULT WEAPON TURN-IN CREDIT.

    (a) In General.--Subpart A of part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting before 
section 26 the following new section:

``SEC. 25E. ASSAULT WEAPON TURN-IN CREDIT.

    ``(a) Allowance of Credit.--
            ``(1) In general.--In the case of an individual who 
        surrenders a specified assault weapon to the United States or a 
        State or local government (or political subdivision thereof) as 
        part of a Federal, State, or local public safety program to 
        reduce the number of privately owned weapons, on the election 
        of the taxpayer there shall be allowed as a credit against the 
        tax imposed by this chapter an amount equal to $2,000.
            ``(2) Year credit allowed.--The amount of the credit under 
        paragraph (1) shall be allowed \1/2\ for the taxable year 
        during which the assault weapon was so surrendered and \1/2\ in 
        the next taxable year.
    ``(b) Special Rules.--
            ``(1) Weapon must be lawfully possessed.--No credit shall 
        be allowed under subsection (a) with respect to any specified 
        assault weapon not lawfully possessed by the taxpayer at the 
        time the weapon is surrendered.
            ``(2) Substantiation requirement.--No credit shall be 
        allowed under subsection (a) for the surrender of any specified 
        assault weapon unless the taxpayer substantiates the surrender 
        by a contemporaneous written acknowledgment of the surrender by 
        the Federal, State, or local governmental entity to which the 
        weapon is surrendered.
            ``(3) Denial of double benefit.--The taxpayer may elect the 
        application of this section with respect to only 1 weapon, and 
        if such election is made for any taxable year, no deduction 
        shall be allowed under any other provision of this chapter with 
        respect to the surrender or contribution of the specified 
        assault weapon.
    ``(c) Assault Weapon.--For purposes of this section--
            ``(1) In general.--The term `specified assault weapon' 
        means any of the following:
                    ``(A) The following rifles or copies or duplicates 
                thereof:
                            ``(i) AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, 
                        MAK90, Misr, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, 
                        VEPR,
                            ``(ii) AR-10,
                            ``(iii) AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite 
                        M15, or Olympic Arms PCR,
                            ``(iv) AR70,
                            ``(v) Calico Liberty,
                            ``(vi) Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or 
                        Dragunov SVU,
                            ``(vii) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, 
                        or FNC,
                            ``(viii) Hi-Point Carbine,
                            ``(ix) HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, or HK-PSG-1,
                            ``(x) Kel-Tec Sub Rifle,
                            ``(xi) M1 Carbine,
                            ``(xii) Saiga,
                            ``(xiii) SAR-8, SAR-4800,
                            ``(xiv) SKS with detachable magazine,
                            ``(xv) SLG 95,
                            ``(xvi) SLR 95 or 96,
                            ``(xvii) Steyr AUG,
                            ``(xviii) Sturm, Ruger Mini-14,
                            ``(xix) Tavor,
                            ``(xx) Thompson 1927, Thompson M1, or 
                        Thompson 1927 Commando, or
                            ``(xxi) Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil 
                        Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz).
                    ``(B) The following pistols or copies or duplicates 
                thereof:
                            ``(i) Calico M-110,
                            ``(ii) MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3,
                            ``(iii) Olympic Arms OA,
                            ``(iv) TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22 Scorpion, or 
                        AB-10, or
                            ``(v) Uzi.
                    ``(C) The following shotguns or copies or 
                duplicates thereof:
                            ``(i) Armscor 30 BG,
                            ``(ii) SPAS 12 or LAW 12,
                            ``(iii) Striker 12, or
                            ``(iv) Streetsweeper.
                    ``(D) A semiautomatic rifle that has an ability to 
                accept a detachable magazine, and that has--
                            ``(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
                            ``(ii) a threaded barrel,
                            ``(iii) a pistol grip,
                            ``(iv) a forward grip, or
                            ``(v) a barrel shroud.
                    ``(E)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), a 
                semiautomatic rifle that has a fixed magazine with the 
                capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
                    ``(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to an attached 
                tubular device designed to accept, and capable of 
                operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.
                    ``(F) A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability 
                to accept a detachable magazine, and has--
                            ``(i) a second pistol grip,
                            ``(ii) a threaded barrel,
                            ``(iii) a barrel shroud, or
                            ``(iv) the capacity to accept a detachable 
                        magazine at a location outside of the pistol 
                        grip.
                    ``(G) A semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine 
                that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds.
                    ``(H) A semiautomatic shotgun that has--
                            ``(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
                            ``(ii) a pistol grip,
                            ``(iii) the ability to accept a detachable 
                        magazine, or
                            ``(iv) a fixed magazine capacity of more 
                        than 5 rounds.
                    ``(I) A shotgun with a revolving cylinder.
                    ``(J) A frame or receiver that is identical to, or 
                based substantially on the frame or receiver of, a 
                firearm described in any of subparagraphs (A) through 
                (I) or (L).
                    ``(K) A conversion kit.
                    ``(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally 
                designed for military or law enforcement use, or a 
                firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is 
                not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as 
                determined by the Attorney General. In making the 
                determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption 
                that a firearm procured for use by the United States 
                military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not 
                particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a 
                firearm shall not be determined to be particularly 
                suitable for sporting purposes solely because the 
                firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.
            ``(2) Related definitions.--
                    ``(A) Barrel shroud.--The term `barrel shroud' 
                means a shroud that is attached to, or partially or 
                completely encircles, the barrel of a firearm so that 
                the shroud protects the user of the firearm from heat 
                generated by the barrel, but does not include a slide 
                that encloses the barrel, and does not include an 
                extension of the stock along the bottom of the barrel 
                which does not encircle or substantially encircle the 
                barrel.
                    ``(B) Conversion kit.--The term `conversion kit' 
                means any part or combination of parts designed and 
                intended for use in converting a firearm into a 
                semiautomatic assault weapon, and any combination of 
                parts from which a semiautomatic assault weapon can be 
                assembled if the parts are in the possession or under 
                the control of a person.
                    ``(C) Detachable magazine.--The term `detachable 
                magazine' means an ammunition feeding device that can 
                readily be inserted into a firearm.
                    ``(D) Fixed magazine.--The term `fixed magazine' 
                means an ammunition feeding device contained in, or 
                permanently attached to, a firearm.
                    ``(E) Folding or telescoping stock.--The term 
                `folding or telescoping stock' means a stock that 
                folds, telescopes, or otherwise operates to reduce the 
                length, size, or any other dimension, or otherwise 
                enhances the concealability, of a firearm.
                    ``(F) Forward grip.--The term `forward grip' means 
                a grip located forward of the trigger that functions as 
                a pistol grip.
                    ``(G) Pistol grip.--The term `pistol grip' means a 
                grip, a thumbhole stock, or any other characteristic 
                that can function as a grip.
                    ``(H) Threaded barrel.--The term `threaded barrel' 
                means a feature or characteristic that is designed in 
                such a manner to allow for the attachment of a firearm 
                as defined in section 5845(a) of the National Firearms 
                Act (26 U.S.C. 5845(a)).
    ``(d) Termination.--This section shall not apply with respect to 
any weapon surrendered during a taxable year beginning more than 2 
years after the date of the enactment of the Support Assault Firearms 
Elimination and Reduction for our Streets Act.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for subpart A of 
part IV of subchapter A of chapter 1 is amended by inserting before the 
item relating to section 26 the following new item:

``Sec. 25E. Assault weapon turn-in credit.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply to 
taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Alex Jones Proves Again That He Is A Creation Of The Corporate Media

Posted on January 17, 2013 by willyloman

by Lee Rogers, Black Listed News
By now many people have probably heard about or have seen the on air confrontation between CNN talk show host Piers Morgan and radio host Alex Jones. The discussion between Morgan and Jones if you even want to call it that largely consisted of Jones behaving like a loud mouthed monkey as they debated the different sides of the gun control issue. This bizarre incident like other media spectacles that Jones has been involved in seems to be nothing more than another staged event to further the personality cult of Alex “Jim” Jones and to boost Morgan’s pitiful television ratings. Unfortunately, there are many people who still believe that Jones is an honest man promoting freedom and fighting corruption when past history clearly shows us that this is not the case.

Simply put, Jones is a creation of the corporate controlled media. The reach of his Austin Texas media platform has only been made possible due to the fact that over the past decade he has been promoted by the likes of big name media outlets such as Fox News, CNN, ABC and countless other radio and television platforms. Without the support of these big media platforms, there is no way this man would be in the position that he enjoys today.
For the past few years his web sites have been regularly linked to by Matt Drudge’s web site the Drudge Report which reaches millions of people on a daily basis. Drudge’s connections to the media establishment are well documented which is not surprising considering Drudge is Jewish just like the people who run the vast majority of these big media enterprises. Jones has even been a regular guest on Coast to Coast AM a nightly syndicated radio broadcast for over the past decade.
With this type of support, it is obvious that Jones is just as phony as all the other dirt bag shills we see on the big television news channels. Over the years there has been an increasing number of people getting news and information from the Internet who are no longer believing the propaganda rubbish on the big media outlets. As a result, it became necessary to fund and support an operation that appears to be outside of the mainstream but in reality exists as a controlled opposition front. The Jones media operation is exactly this and it is becoming increasingly obvious that this is the case based off of this latest stunt on Morgan’s show and previous stunts like the insanely ridiculous Charlie Sheen interview a short while ago. Although many people have probably forgotten, the Sheen event literally put Jones in the center of what was at the time, the biggest tabloid news story in the United States. It resulted in his media operation receiving promotion from all of the biggest news and entertainment shows including an invite on ABC’s talk show “The View” which is watched by millions of people.
There are countless other reasons why this man and his operation are completely untrustworthy but let’s look at one that is most applicable to what happened on the Morgan show. In 2010 Jones completely disrupted a pro-gun rights rally in Austin Texas by using a megaphone to shout over people who were speaking to an audience of second amendment advocates. The only reason why someone would do something like this is if they are completely insane, a paid operative, a jealous egotistical freak or all of the above. His actions at this rally also bring into question his integrity in supporting the second amendment as he alone managed to ruin what looked to be a successful event promoting gun rights.
What really sucks about this recent fiasco is the fact that if we take what Jones says at face value, he is correct on many points about firearms and the second amendment. Several people including a fairly large number of Jewish Congressional figures and Jewish media whores are calling for bans on assault weapons and other ridiculous restrictions on firearms. It is painfully obvious that if law abiding citizens do not have the means to defend themselves than the only people who will have weapons will be criminals and uniformed goons representing the government. This means that crime will increase and the government would be able to exercise authoritarian rule over its disarmed citizens which is probably exactly what these crazy individuals really want. Look at how the media humanizes the recent alleged shooting events that have occurred in the United States but how they gloss over innocent people who have been killed by overseas drone strikes per the order of the Obama administration. It proves that the media only humanizes a story not because they have empathy for injured people or the loss of life but only because they have an agenda. The current agenda at play is clearly designed to generate public support for any number of gun control measures. The media seems particularly interested in promoting a draconian piece of anti-gun legislation that is being primarily pushed in the U.S. Senate by the disgusting freedom hating Jewess Dianne Feinstein.
Unfortunately with Jones acting like a rabid foaming at the mouth gorilla on the Morgan show it has given these pussy gun control advocates all sorts of propaganda fodder. All they need to do is show people the footage of the interview and there will be many who will likely agree that if an irresponsible man like Jones is advocating the second amendment, than perhaps gun control measures should be reconsidered.
The bottom line though is that the whole thing just reeks of a stunt from start to finish. Never mind the crazy nature of the interview, but even weeks ago you can see how this was being built up with Jones endorsing a petition to deport Morgan from the United States. On top of that Jones would claim that after the interview paid goons working for New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg were making veiled threats to him and that his life was in danger. This is comical considering he’s previously made similar claims with supposed guys in high and tight haircuts from the U.S. Army following him around. According to his own statements, his life has been in danger countless times yet nothing has ever happened to him so why should we believe him this time around? His websites would even make a big deal out of his alleged encounter with the TSA during his travels to New York City for the interview. Even more ridiculous is the fact that Jones stated that his appearance on the Morgan show made a Jewish CNN producer cry right after the interview ended. Clearly the Jones media operation has been attempting to squeeze every last bit of attention they can get from this by promoting these absurd stories.
As much as Jones should be loathed, Morgan as a media figure should be equally as despised. Why the hell is there some jackass Brit on a primetime CNN slot telling Americans what policies he thinks should be implemented here?   The last thing Americans want or need is another media propagandist on television, let alone a propagandist who isn’t even an American. Morgan’s links to the much publicized British phone hacking scandal have been well documented and widely reported raising serious questions about his ethics. In fact the ethics of both Morgan and Jones are deeply in question making it even more likely that they would collude to engage in some form of chicanery.
To reiterate, this appears to have been nothing more than a staged media stunt that benefitted the establishment in every way possible. Jones made second amendment advocates look insane, it drew massive social media attention to Morgan’s horrific news show and now more people know who Jones is with his website being plastered all over the media.   In fact the stunt was so successful that Alex Jones became the number one trending topic worldwide on Twitter for over a day. If Jones was really against the establishment do you really believe they would be giving him this much free press coverage, let alone allow him to spend several minutes ranting about the second amendment on a prime time cable news broadcast?
Please do not support Alex Jones or anything related to his operation in any way. He is a creation of the corporate controlled media and is only pretending that he has no associations with them. He is nothing more than an actor just like Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity and other stooges who wear fancy suits that talk in front of a camera.
This is a man who once claimed that the Arabs run Hollywood despite the fact that Jewish interests dating back to the early part of the 20^th century have always run Hollywood. This man is nothing more than a Judas goat leading everyone to slaughter. It is truly unfortunate that we will likely see many more of these media spectacles involving the likes of Mr. Jones as he takes his place as the new Rush Limbaugh.      http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2013/01/17/alex-jones-proves-again-that-he-is-a-creation-of-the-corporate-media/

the gipster

Thursday, January 17, 2013

Forbes Deletes Popular Pro Gun Story, Linking Psychiatric Drugs To Murders

Forbes Deletes Popular Pro Gun Story, Linking Psychiatric Drugs To Murders

How to Create a Fake “Online Girlfriend”

How to Create a Fake “Online Girlfriend”