Monday, July 8, 2013

Google Doodle: What happened at Roswell?

In the summer of 1947, something fell into a New Mexican ranch. What was it?

By Contributor / July 8, 2013
The July 8 Google doodle is pictured here.
Google screenshot
Enlarge Photos (1 of 2) PreviousNext

Sixty-six years ago, something fell from the sky into a ranch in Roswell, New Mexico. Today, that object has fallen into an interactive Google Doodle. What happened over six decades ago?



Sometime in early July 1947 (the exact date is unclear), witnesses reported flying saucers cruising over the red-brown desert, the latest reports in a spate of sightings that summer. The scene was set for Mac Brazel, the foreman of a New Mexican ranch near Roswell, to ride out on horseback on one of those July afternoons as he always did, herding his sheep. But this was an unusual ride. Strewn across the property was metallic debris. He told the sheriff’s office, which alerted Major Jesse Marcel from the Roswell Army Air Field, who then alerted the Eighth Air Field. Soon, much of America was aware of a problem on a remote New Mexican ranch.
On the morning of July 8th, Colonel William Blanchard, Commander of the 509th Bomb Group, issued a press release from the local military base that a “crashed disk” had been recovered from the ranch. But just hours later, General Roger Ramey, Commander of the Eighth Air Force at Fort Worth Army Air Field in Texas, some 400 miles from the ranch, issued a correction rescinding the earlier release. The debris was from a surveillance balloon, and the Roswell Military base had made a terrible error, it said.
It looked, no doubt, like a cover-up. And so the world set about picking up threads of what had happened from the fragments that people had seen or heard, sewing it all together into a collective narrative of the Roswell Incident.
Radio journalists in the region said that the FBI annulled their broadcasts of reports from the ground. A local funeral director, Glenn Brown, said he received unusual calls from an air field officer about how to preserve damaged bodies, as well as order for two small and sealable caskets. Residents said that the army had been seen tugging alien bodies – four of them, with bulbous heads and eyes – out of the rubble and alleged that the UFO and its alien cargo had been scooped up and ferried quietly into Area 51, the ultra-secretive military base in Nevada. Some had photos.

KELLER: Trying to figure out what was going on in Silva's head during the fight and how he'll react tomorrow when he wakes up without the belt

KELLER: Trying to figure out what was going on in Silva's head during the fight and how he'll react tomorrow when he wakes up without the belt
LYMAN: After playing with fire for far too long, Anderson Silva got burned at UFC 162
Jul 7, 2013 - 8:15:59 PM




SilvaAnderson_Wide_60.png

http://www.mmatorch.com/artman2/publish/Staff_Editorials_19/article_17557.shtml?utm_source=scribol.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=scribol.com#.UdscIW0yBdA
By: Cameron Lyman, MMATorch Columnist

"Does he always do this?" she said to me. "Yeah, he's a f***ing alien", I said. We were of course talking about Anderon Silva hanging his hands and leaning back, dodging a rushing Chris Weidman's shots like Neo in The Matrix. The next thing I knew, the greatest pound for pound fighter was unconscious and now the former UFC Middleweight Champion.

Leading up to this fight, in a room full of newcomers and casual observers, someone asked me to break down the fight. "You never know what he is going to do. Whatever it is, we will see something spectacular. He hasn't put on a bad performance in awhile and when he did, he just clowned someone for five rounds. But I guess if you want a prediction, Silva will keep his distance for the first minute and size Weidman up, figure out his timing. After a minute, minute and a half, he will land a big strike and watch for him to open up after about three minutes. Weidman though, won't give him the time and space to do that. Look for him to go for a takedown early and try to control Silva."

Going into this fight, this was the only thing I could be sure of. Anderson Silva is a truly puzzling character. While sometimes we watch Silva wondering "what the hell is he doing," we know without certainty that he is doing exactly what he wants to do. The question here was "What was he going to do this time?"

Like I had thought, Weidman had gone for an early takedown and was successful. Quickly he started landing some big shots and this began to look like Silva was facing Chael Sonnen, but with power. After controlling the champ for a while, Weidman switched to his submission game. At this point I was starting to get a little worried for the Champ. However, Silva defended and was able to get back to his feet. Right away, Silva started his game of showboating to get into Weidman's head. He hung his hands, and stuck his chin out. However, he was losing the round. There was nothing to be cocky about... yet.

He backed himself into the cage and Weidman went for another takedown but Silva easily shrugged it off. After another clinch, Silva was again able to avoid the takedown and the fighters made their way to the middle of the cage. With under two minutes left, Silva started opening up the striking. He changed between landing shots, taunting Weidman and countering. He had made Weidman fight his fight, backing up and firing back punishing leg kicks. Suddenly it looked like Weidman had just realized that he was fighting Anderson Silva.

"Look at Weidman. He's shook! I guarantee the adrenaline dump is going to kill him," I said as the first round closed out with Silva stalking and taunting a bewildered Chris Weidman. I remarked about how quickly the UFC made us forget that only two fights ago, Weidman was badly gassed in a fight with Demian Maia. Hear me now people: Right then and there, in his mind, Anderson Silva won the fight. He was able to take what Weidman had to offer and got Weidman to fight his fight. On top of that, he was able to rob Weidman of his confidence as he has done time and time again. For the former champ, this was all too familiar. He knew that if he wanted to, he could win the fight.

As the second round was about to start, Silva was begging Weidman to give him a challenge. Moving around the ring, Silva took one of Weidman's shots and pretended to be hurt, with wobbly limbs. I thought to myself, Dana White must be losing his mind right now. This is looking like the Silva-Maia. Floating like a butterfly, Silva moved around the cage and again shrugged off a Weidman takedown. Hanging his hands, Silva moved around and twice landed some big leg kicks and lazily went for his highlight reel front kick finish.

And then Weidman landed a left while Silva pretended to be hurt. He dropped his hands, bent his knees, and stuck his chin out directly in front of the challenger. Weidman lands a shot and Silva leans out of the way of two more. The third one caught the champ on the chin, his eyes rolled into the back of his head, and he fell to the canvas. Rushing in, Herb Dean stopped Weidman as he bounced Anderson Silva's unconscious head off the canvas with his fists.

Immediately I felt ill. That's not what was supposed to happen. Or was it? "He wanted to lose" I said in total disbelief. After digesting what happened last night, I have a slightly different viewpoint. Silva didn't want to lose, he wanted to be challenged. He had done to Weidman what he had done to all the others. Now all he had to do was go for the finish. Just don't pull an Abu Dhabi...

Going back to the Thales Laites fight, and even arguably the first Sonnen fight, Silva has decided what was going to happen in his fights with super human ability. If he wants to finish you, he will. At 38 years of age, with sixteen straight UFC wins over six years, again, here he is telling his opponent "Come on! Let's go. Finish me! Here is my chin on a platter." Unfortunately for him, Weidman was able to oblige the disinterested champ as he played limbo with the challenger's fists.

With every passing win, the questions have always been, "Who can beat Anderson Silva and how are they going to do it?" Silva has refused us the answer to that question (not to mention all of the bubbling superfight talks that have surrounded him for years) by burning himself on a pyre. While the fight world may be abuzz with questions, the only one I'm wondering about is this: "Will the Spider emerge a phoenix?"

[Anderson Silva art by Cory Gould (c) MMATorch.com]

NSA leaks raise concerns on background checks - U.S. - Stripes

NSA leaks raise concerns on background checks - U.S. - Stripes

You Can’t Hide From These Prying Eyes | The Moderate Voice

You Can’t Hide From These Prying Eyes | The Moderate Voice

Exclusive: Obama’s NSA Operates on Two Sets of Books. Who is Watching the Watchers?

Exclusive: Obama’s NSA Operates on Two Sets of Books. Who is Watching the Watchers?

They Can Kill You With the Push Of a Button: Gaping Holes In Your Electronic Health Records

They Can Kill You With the Push Of a Button: Gaping Holes In Your Electronic Health Records

Secret move keeps bin Laden records in the shadows

Source: LD
The top U.S. special operations commander, Adm. William McRaven, ordered military files about the Navy SEAL raid on Osama bin Laden’s hideout to be purged from Defense Department computers and sent to the CIA, where they could be more easily shielded from ever being made public.
The secret move, described briefly in a draft report by the Pentagon’s inspector general, set off no alarms within the Obama administration even though it appears to have sidestepped federal rules and perhaps also the U.S. Freedom of Information Act.
An acknowledgement by Adm. William McRaven of his actions was quietly removed from the final version of an inspector general’s report published weeks ago. A spokesman for the admiral declined to comment. The CIA, noting that the bin Laden mission was overseen by then-CIA Director Leon Panetta before he became defense secretary, said that the SEALs were effectively assigned to work temporarily for the CIA, which has presidential authority to conduct covert operations.
“Documents related to the raid were handled in a manner consistent with the fact that the operation was conducted under the direction of the CIA director,” agency spokesman Preston Golson said in an emailed statement. “Records of a CIA operation such as the (bin Laden) raid, which were created during the conduct of the operation by persons acting under the authority of the CIA Director, are CIA records.”
Golson said it is “absolutely false” that records
were moved to the CIA to avoid the legal requirements of the Freedom of Information Act.
The records transfer was part of an effort by McRaven to protect the names of the personnel involved in the raid, according to the inspector general’s draft report.
But secretly moving the records allowed the Pentagon to tell The Associated Press that it couldn’t find any documents inside the Defense Department that AP had requested more than two years ago, and would represent a new strategy for the U.S. government to shield even its most sensitive activities from public scrutiny.
“Welcome to the shell game in place of open government,” said Thomas Blanton, director of the National Security Archive, a private research institute at George Washington University. “Guess which shell the records are under. If you guess the right shell, we might show them to you. It’s ridiculous.”
McRaven’s directive sent the only copies of the military’s records about its daring raid to the CIA, which has special authority to prevent the release of “operational files” in ways that can’t effectively be challenged in federal court. The Defense Department can prevent the release of its own military files, citing risks to national security, but that can be contested in court and a judge can compel it to turn over non-sensitive portions of records.
Transferring government records from one executive agency to another must be approved in writing by the National Archives and Records Administration, under the Code of Federal Regulations. There are limited circumstances when prior approval is not required, such as when the records are moved between two components of the same executive department. The CIA and Special Operations Command are not part of the same department.
The Archives was not aware of any request from the U.S. Special Operations Command to transfer its records to the CIA, spokeswoman Miriam Kleiman said. She said it was the Archives’ understanding that the military records belonged to the CIA, so transferring them wouldn’t have required permission under U.S. rules.
Other rules from the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff dictate that records about military operations and planning are to be considered permanent and after 25 years, following a declassification review, transferred to the National Archives.
Also, the Federal Records Act would not permit agencies “to purge records just on a whim,” said Dan Metcalfe, who oversaw the U.S. government’s compliance with the Freedom of Information Act as former director of the Justice Department’s Office of Information and Privacy. “I don’t think there’s an exception allowing an agency to say, ‘Well, we didn’t destroy it. We just deleted it here after transmitting it over there.’ High-level officials ought to know better.”
It was not immediately clear exactly which Defense Department records were purged and transferred, when it happened or under what authority, if any, they were sent to the CIA. No government agencies the AP contacted would discuss details of the transfer.
The AP asked for files about the mission in more than 20 separate requests, mostly submitted in May 2011—several were sent a day after President Barack Obama announced that the world’s most wanted terrorist had been killed in a firefight. Obama has pledged to make his administration the most transparent in U.S. history.
McRaven’s unusual order would have remained secret had it not been mentioned in a single sentence on the final page in the inspector general’s draft report that examined whether the Obama administration gave special access to Hollywood executives planning a film, “Zero Dark Thirty,” about the raid. The draft report was obtained and posted online last month by the Project on Government Oversight, a nonprofit watchdog group in Washington.
McRaven described steps he took to protect the identities of the SEALs after the raid, directing that their names and photographs not be released.
“This effort included purging the combatant command’s systems of all records related to the operation and providing these records to another government agency,” according to the draft report. The sentence was dropped from the report’s final version.
Current and former Defense Department officials knowledgeable about McRaven’s directive and the inspector general’s report told AP the description of the order in the draft report is accurate. The reference to “another government agency” was code for the CIA, they said. These individuals spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the matter by name.
The Defense Department told the AP in March 2012 it could not locate any photographs or video taken during the raid or showing bin Laden’s body. It also said it could not find any images of bin Laden’s body on the USS Carl Vinson, the aircraft carrier from which he was buried at sea. The Pentagon also said it could not find any death certificate, autopsy report or results of DNA identification tests for bin Laden, or any pre-raid materials discussing how the government planned to dispose of bin Laden’s body if he were killed. It said it searched files at the Pentagon, Special Operations Command headquarters in Tampa, Fla., and the Navy command in San Diego that controls the Carl Vinson.
The Pentagon also refused to confirm or deny the existence of helicopter maintenance logs and reports about the performance of military gear used in the raid. One of the stealth helicopters that carried the SEALs in Pakistan crashed during the mission and its wreckage was left behind.

The Truth Behind Barack Obama’s Benghazi Body Of Lies : Freedom Outpost

The Truth Behind Barack Obama’s Benghazi Body Of Lies : Freedom Outpost

Were Law Offices Representing State Dept. Whistleblower Broke Into By Hillary Clinton’s Associates? : Freedom Outpost

Were Law Offices Representing State Dept. Whistleblower Broke Into By Hillary Clinton’s Associates? : Freedom Outpost

Does The CIA Director Have Barack Obama's Records That Prove He Is Ineligible To Be President? : Freedom Outpost

Does The CIA Director Have Barack Obama's Records That Prove He Is Ineligible To Be President? : Freedom Outpost

Why we should all switch back to ethernet cables: Wireless internet poses serious chronic health risks

Why we should all switch back to ethernet cables: Wireless internet poses serious chronic health risks

'Train wreck' Obamacare begins to unravel; massive government boondoggle set to self-destruct by 2015

naturalnews.com

Originally published July 8 2013
Obama

'Train wreck' Obamacare begins to unravel; massive government boondoggle set to self-destruct by 2015

by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor

(NaturalNews) Even before it is fully implemented, Obamacare is already starting to self-destruct. The White House announced last week it will simply invent its own interpretation of the law and "delay the enforcement" of the employer Obamacare mandate for another year, to 2015. This, we are told, is to allow businesses more time to "smooth" compliance with the law, but that's only the cover story. In reality, the entire private sector economy was preparing to fire tens of millions of workers, cut their hours and radically downsize companies in order to avoid going bankrupt under Obamacare mandates that no one can afford.

Described as a "train wreck" by one of its original authors (Sen. Baucus), and called a "fiasco for the ages" by the Wall Street Journal, Obamacare is a massive government boondoggle that's headed for complete disaster.

In a desperate effort to get out of the way of that oncoming train, insurance companies are scrambling to flee the market entirely. America's largest health insurer, UnitedHealth, has just announced it's closing shop in California and walking away from all health insurance customers there.

That's how bad Obamacare really is, even for the insurance companies: it's better to close up shop than even attempt to serve customers under the government's onerous rules.

U.S. businesses, meanwhile, are engaged in a new wave of job offshoring to India, Pakistan and the Philippines, where Obamacare doesn't exist and an entire workers' salary can be less than the cost of health insurance in the U.S. all by itself. The realization has hit everyone who owns or runs a business: Obamacare will bankrupt America's private sector unless businesses take proactive measures to minimize the hiring U.S. workers.

This is especially true in low-wage jobs -- such as the food service industry -- where an employee's contribution to a business simply isn't that valuable to begin with.

When will the Obamacare train wreck completely derail?

All these are yet more signs that Obamacare's socialist-inspired health care utopia is turning out to be a total nightmare. As we've predicted here on Natural News, much of the system will eventually have to be scrapped or sharply scaled back. Why? Because almost no one can afford the scheme.

Employers have already begun slashing workforce hours in order to avoid the employer mandates, and individuals who need health insurance are starting to freak out over the reality that their rates are going to double or triple once Obamacare fully kicks in.

Remember: This is a law that was advertised as providing either "free" or "affordable" care to everyone, including people with pre-existing conditions. What it actually turned out to be, however, was a monopoly handout to the sick-care industry and the health insurance giants. Instead of promoting health, it kept Americans trapped in a system that profits from chronic disease. Instead of being "affordable," it's making health insurance costs double or triple for many people.

Obamacare actually designed to destroy the private sector and make everyone dependent on government

There is one benefit to democrats in all this, however: the fact that employers are already firing workers and downsizing operations in anticipation of Obamacare mandates has results in millions of new people subsisting on welfare and food stamps... and that's the ultimate goal of the socialist progressive state.

The idea is to destroy the private sector economy and make everyone completely dependent on the government for their food, incomes, housing, education and health care. Only then will the collectivist utopia be fully realized, complete with a domineering spy state, tyrannical police, suffocating tax rates and selective persecution of political enemies by the IRS.

Since Obama took office, food stamp rolls have exploded. From 2007 to 2011, the number of Americans on food stamps grew by 70% to 45 million, and as of 2012, food stamp expenditures have reached $75 billion a year.

Over four million Americans are now on welfare, and another 5.6 million are living on unemployment insurance. In most U.S. states, welfare pays more than having an $8 / hour job! So as Obamacare kicks in, employers will start tossing people out of their jobs, forcing many of them onto precisely the spiral-of-dependence government programs the Obama administration has been desperately seeking to expand. As the number of Americans who depend on the government expands, so does voter support for whichever party happens to promise the biggest handouts... the democrats, of course.

This is how democrats believe you create a perfect society: destroy all private-sector businesses and put the government in charge of everything. This is being done by design, and Obamacare is the lynchpin that will make the hiring of employees all but unaffordable for many businesses.

Obamacare delay a strategy to protect the 2014 elections

The one-year delay of Obamacare is timed, no doubt, to make sure employers don't feel the full punishment of Obamacare mandates until after the 2014 election. The White House wants to make sure voters and employers don't fully realize just how tragic Obamacare really is when they go to the polls next year. After all, if democrats can achieve a majority in the House, they can ram through their full package of socialist, fascist policies without resistance. Right now, the House of Representatives is the only thing blocking a full-on socialist agenda that would criminalize the Second Amendment and legalize 11+ million illegal aliens so they can vote. (It's every Democrat's deepest fantasy!)

Because once Obamacare really kicks in, all bets are off. All over America, tens of millions of workers will be getting pink slips. While those workers probably voted for Obama in the hope that their employer would be forced to provide them full health care coverage, the sobering reality is that no political mandate can alter the laws of economics. If federal law makes hiring employees prohibitively expensive, employers have little choice but to cut jobs and fire workers.

No mandate from Washington can change the laws of economics

Democrats, of course, tend to think that money appears as if by magic and that businesses can be forced to pay for things they can't afford. But what they fail to recognize is that businesses always have the choice to simply go out of business or radically downsize, firing workers all the way down as they shrink below Obamacare mandate thresholds. Hence the term "49ers" which isn't a sports franchise. It's the nickname given to all the medium-sized businesses across America that are shedding workers to get below the 50-employee threshold where Obamacare mandates put you out of business. If you just happen to be employee number 50, 51 or 52, expect to be fired even though you've done nothing wrong. Thank Obama for forcing your employer to shrink to 49 employees.

So all those Americans who suddenly find themselves jobless can thank Obama, Pelosi and all the other nincompoops in Washington for yet more socialist incompetence. What they all fail to realize is that there's no such thing as a free lunch. Not even if it's mandated by the White House. The laws of economics do not bow down to any president.

Thanks to Obama's delay of Obamacare until 2015, however, you may get to hold on to your job for another year. But unless you're in a high-level position where your employer can't live without you, be prepared to hit the street in late 2014 as companies start slashing jobs in a desperate bid to meet the "49er" requirement. You'll be joined by a wave of other recently-jobless who were also let go because of Obamacare mandates. Good luck finding employment anywhere, since you'll have loads of competition at precisely the same time no company wants to cross the 50-employee threshold.

Thanks, Obama, for causing even more Americans to lose their jobs. It's one more score for the same President that has expanded Gitmo, kept marijuana criminalized, refused to label GMOs and scaled up a massive domestic surveillance infrastructure run by the NSA. Is there anything Obama promised that hasn't ended in complete betrayal?




All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing LLC takes sole responsibility for all content. Truth Publishing sells no hard products and earns no money from the recommendation of products. NaturalNews.com is presented for educational and commentary purposes only and should not be construed as professional advice from any licensed practitioner. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. For the full terms of usage of this material, visit www.NaturalNews.com/terms.shtml

Abortion activists caught on camera, possessed by spooky 'Hail Satan' chant at Texas State Capitol

Abortion activists caught on camera, possessed by spooky 'Hail Satan' chant at Texas State Capitol

Michael Hastings Cover-Up Confirmed – San Diego 6 – Investigative Report On Michael Hastings Crash

Sunday, July 7, 2013 20:08

San Diego 6 has done an investigative report into the death of Michael Hastings and, in the process, have confirmed that a cover-up of the ‘real’ cause of his death is underway. Both police and the fire department have been TOLD not to comment for this story and a police report was not made available. Why not? What do they have to hide if this was merely ‘a crash’? Silence often speaks louder than words…


Published on Jul 7, 2013        

Kimberly Dvorak joins us to talk about the controversial death of Michael Hastings, who died in a firey crash in L.A. All rights to this video belong to San Diego 6.

Government Spying Has Always Focused On Crushing Dissent … Not On Keeping Us Safe

Government Spying Has Always Focused On Crushing Dissent … Not On Keeping Us Safe

Everything You Wanted to Know about Spying … But Were Afraid to Ask

Everything You Wanted to Know about Spying … But Were Afraid to Ask

Excess Reserves at the Federal Reserve. One of The Biggest Financial Scams In History: A Whopping US$1.794 Trillion

Region:
fedreserve
Banks’ excess reserves at FED is one of the biggest scam by the FED and there is a conspiracy of silence as to its actual implications. Economists and financial analysts spewing nonsense to mislead and divert attention to non-issues so that the public is kept in the dark.
The issue of banks’ reserves at the FED and other central banks in the world is a complex subject with much technical jargons that confuses a lot of people. Besides, don’t be surprised that your bank branch manager on Main Street as well as lecturers in finance and economics are also ignorant on this issue. In the case of the latter, this subject is hardly taught in universities. And this is the reason why the scam has not been exposed till today.
But, for those who have a basic idea of bank reserves and how this huge amount of “excess reserves” have been created by the FED, have you asked yourself, “Why have I not spotted this scam earlier?”
Many have been taken in by the propaganda that “excess reserves” is the means to encourage banks to extend credit (give out loans) to desperate borrowers who needed urgent funds to survive and to jump-start their businesses. This propaganda is grounded on the assumption that there is insufficient liquidity in the market.
This assumption is misleading.
What are Excess Reserves
The latest figures obtained from the H.3 release from the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the FED) shows excess reserves of about $1.794 trillion (data as of April 17, 2013), This level of excess reserves is unprecedented and is the highest since reserves were legislated as a requirement.
Please read the below paragraph carefully, ponder deeply before proceeding further. Don’t rush. It is important that you understand this simple fact as otherwise you would not appreciate the audacity of this financial scam!
Excess reserves are the surplus of reserves against deposits and certain other liabilities that depository institutions (collectively referred to as “banks”) hold above the statutory amounts that the FED requires in accordance with the law. The general requirement is that banks maintain reserves at least equal to ten percent of liabilities payable on demand. There is now data to show that as much as 50% of these “excess reserves” are held for United States banking offices of foreign banks.
Let me elaborate. Banks receives deposits from their customers which are inter-alia placed in current accounts (checking accounts) or time deposits (fixed deposit accounts) and which the customer can at any time withdraw from the bank. But, banking practice shows that at any one time, only a small fraction of customers would withdraw their deposits in full. So, there was no need for banks to keep all the deposits in their vaults to meet such a demand for payment. Laws were enacted to allow banks to keep in reserve a small amount of monies to meet such demands.
That being the case – if only 10% reserves is all that is required according to banking regulations to meet repayment demands, why should there be such a huge amount of reserves, beyond the legal requirement of 10%?
Keep this question at the back of your mind to understand the huge scam by the FED.
A Slight Digression
In a previous article, I had exposed the fact that when a customer deposits monies in a bank, he is in law a “creditor” (he has loaned the monies to the bank) and the bank is a “debtor” (and he can use the money in any way at his absolute discretion, even to speculate).
This is because the ownership of the money has been transferred to the bank. The money is no longer the money of the customer. It now belongs to the bank. And as long as the bank is solvent, and there is a demand for repayment of the deposit, the law of contract stipulates that the bank must repay together with the agreed interest that has accrued.
However, if at the time when demand for repayment is made, the bank is bankrupt (i.e. in a liquidation) then the depositor/customer in law is deemed an “unsecured creditor” and must join the queue of all unsecured creditors to share the proceeds of any remaining assets after all secured creditors have been paid. If there are no remaining assets, the depositors get zilch! Ouch!!!!!!
That is why and as illustrated in the bank confiscation of deposits in Cyprus banks acting in concert with central banks can expropriate all customers’ deposits to pay their secured creditors.
I will elaborate on this issue later.
Let’s return to the issue of excess reserves.
How Did The Excess Reserves Balloon To A Massive US$1.794 Trillion? A Simple Summary
The Fed’s overall balance sheet has expanded from about $909 billion before the crisis (i.e. before 2008) to about $3.3 trillion in 2013. Of the $2.4 trillion increase, approximately $1.8 trillion is excess reserves.
Banks were up to their eyeballs in toxic assets (financial sewage) and they are drowning in this cesspool but for the rescue efforts of the FED and other central banks they would have sunk to the bottom of the cesspool.
First Stage of Excess Reserves Scam
From the diagram below, you will see that the FED created trillions of money out of thin air by a digital entry in its books to purchase the toxic assets (financial sewage) in batches from the banks. The objective of QEs is to save the banks and to save the US Treasury from bankruptcy and not Joe Six-Packs. However, in this article we are focusing on the banks.
So, let’s say that the banks HAVE OVER US$10 trillion of financial sewage AND WANT TO DISPOSE THEM WITHOUT AROUSING ANY ALARM.
From the diagram below, you will see the monies flowing from the FED to the banks to purchase the financial sewage. The financial sewage is sucked into the FED’s financial vacuum. However the monies are not channeled to the banks’ branches in Main Street to be loaned out to Joe Six-Packs. It is re-routed back to the FED as “reserves”. When the reserves exceed the minimum 10% requirement, the excess is classified as “excess reserves.”
This is merely a book entry! And adding insult and injury to Joe Six-Packs, interest of 0.25% is paid on the reserves (i.e. giving profits to the banks).
The banks are allowed to survive in spite of their massive frauds and other financial hanky-pankies. The banks are allowed to use digital technology (e.g. high-frequency trading) to corner the market and destroy Joe-Six-Packs. But, Joe-Six-Packs have to suffer the indignity of unemployment, foreclosures, reduced unemployment benefits, survive on food-stamps, and other austerity measures. Additionally, and to prevent any opposition to the financial and ruling elites, Joe-Six-Packs are now under intense surveillance by NSA’s Prism Program that tracks every move, phone calls, emails, etc.
Can you now see the audacity of this scam?
The money flows from the FED to the Too Big To Fail (TBTF) Banksters to Buy Toxic Assets, which is sucked in by the FED’s Financial Vacuum, thereby cleansing the TBTF banks’ balance sheets. The money is then re-routed back to the FED as “excess reserves”.
The FED create monies out of thin air to bail-out the Too Big To Fail banks (TBTF banks) by purchasing their financial sewage (valued at book value as opposed to mark-to-market i.e. instead of paying only 10 cents on the dollar or less, the FED pays dollar for dollar) thereby removing the financial sewage from the balance sheet of the TBTF banks to reflect a “healthier” balance sheet as there are now less financial sewage in the banking system.
And, because the TBTF banks are suffering losses, the FED pays 0.25% interest on the “excess reserves” created so as to generate easy profits for the TBTF banks for doing nothing at all. They are earning profits merely from a book-entry in the FED’s books!
The propaganda which I referred to earlier that such monies were meant to enable the TBTF banks to extend credit is therefore bullshit and a load of financial nonsense. So why are the so-called reputable economists at leading universities such as Harvard, Princeton, Cambridge, Oxford etc. touting this propaganda?
There is so much financial sewage in the banking system, that in law the banks cannot extend further credits to Joe Six-Packs unless and until the balance sheets of the TBTF banks are cleaned up, and the banks properly re-capitalised to continue with their banking business. (See Basel III Accords).
The so-called record profits declared by the TBTF banks and the huge bonuses given out to the bankers and their hire-lings are all window dressing as long as the toxic assets are not marked-to-market and not declared as junk. If such assets are properly declared, the fiat money banking system would be staring at a bottomless black-hole of toxic assets and indebtness!
This is the reason why QE has to continue. The QE programs are to drain the financial sewage from the banking system.
I had earlier stated that banks are required at have at least 10% of the deposits as reserves.
This has compounded the problem. After the Global Financial Tsunami, all the TBTF banks don’t have enough reserves to meet the withdrawal of deposits placed by customers before the crash. The TBTF banks don’t even have the requisite 10% reserves to meet these demand deposits (Old Deposits). That is why this scam was perpetrated by the FED as illustrated in the above diagram.
However, banks are continuing to receive deposits from customers of which 10% of these deposits must be transferred to the FED as reserves.
Under the fractional reserve banking system, the banks are allowed and can loan out the remaining 90% of the deposits as loan by a multiplier of ten – i.e. if new deposits total US$100 million, US$10 million will be transferred to reserves to meet withdrawals as explained above. By fractional reserve banking principles, the bank can loan out (based on a multiplier of ten) US$90 million x 10 = US$900 million. Data shows that customers’ deposits are at an all time high (since 2007), but bank lending is not keeping pace.
Banks are not lending out what they are entitled to do so for two reasons:
1) The banks are using a portion of the “New Deposits” to meet the liability of having to repay the “Old Deposits” in the system. This is because even the excess reserves (created under the QE) are insufficient to meet the demand for repayment of the Old Deposits. So, part of the current New Deposits would be utilised for that purpose. This is the Deposit Ponzi Scheme.
2) Banks are earning no risk profits from interests on “Excess Reserves” at the FED and are only willing to lend to credible borrowers. In the present economic climate, there are just too few credible customers. This is another reason why banks are not lending.
Therefore, and as stated earlier, the problem is not liquidity but rather, it is and always has been the insolvency of the TBTF banks and the financial sewage clogging the entire fiat money banking system.
Food For Thought
“Reserves don’t even factor into my model, that’s not what causes inflation and not how the Fed stimulates the economy. It’s a side effect.” – Former Fed Governor Laurence Meyer, co-founder of Macroeconomic Advisers
Second Stage of Excess Reserves Scam
If and when the economy recovers (maybe 2019??), the FED will repackage the toxic assets into new financial products to be sold to a new generation of stupid investors. Banks are not even required to pay, as the monies are still kept with the FED (book entry). In this final transaction, there will be a reverse-entry in the banks’ books.
Laurence Meyer is saying what many has deliberately ignored and or missed out completely. When QE stops, the FED would not be out on a limp because the monies used to purchase the financial sewage from the TBTF banks are still in the FED’s books.
The Fed need only to have a reverse entry in it’s books after re-packaging the financial sewage INTO SOME NEW FORM OF FINANCIAL PRODUCT OR WHATEVER (which the TBTF banks are adept at doing before the crash and are still continuing to do so) and dumping them back to the banks and another generation of stupid investors at such time when and if the banks have recovered – maybe 2019?
Further, with the bank’s unbridled right (sanctioned by law) to confiscate the customers’ deposits (now commonly referred as “Bail-In”) using the Cyprus template, banks have additional financial resources to continue with the plunder and financial rape of the public. Wake Up, I rest my case.


The Hidden (And Not So Hidden) Messages in Stanley Kubrick’s “Eyes Wide Shut” (pt. I)

Jul 8th, 2013 | http://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/the-hidden-and-not-so-hidden-messages-in-stanley-kubriks-eyes-wide-shut-pt-i/


“Eyes Wide Shut” was promoted as a steamy, suspenseful movie starring the “It” couple of the day: Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. While the actors were prominently featured in the movie, it is everything around them that told the true story of “Eyes Wide Shut”. Stanley Kubrick’s attention to detail and symbolism gave the movie an entire other dimension – one that cannot be seen by those who have their eyes wide shut. This multiple-part series will look at the hidden symbolism of Kubrick’s final film.

leadeyes1
I remember when I first watched Eyes Wide Shut, back in 1999. Boy, did I hate it. I hated how slow everything was, I hated how Nicole Kidman tried to sound drunk or high and I hated seeing Tom Cruise walk around New York looking concerned. I guess I reacted the same way critics did at the time the movie came out and thought: “This movie is boring and there is nothing hot about it.” More than a decade later, equipped with a little more knowledge and patience, I re-watched the movie … and it blew my mind. In fact, like most Stanley Kubrick films, an entire book could be written about the movie and the concepts it addresses. Eyes Wide Shut is indeed not simply about a relationship, it is about all of the outside forces and influences that define that relationship. It is about the eternal back-and-forth between the male and female principles in a confused and decadent modern world. Also, more importantly, it is about the group that rules this modern world – a secret elite that channels this struggle between the male and female principles in a specific and esoteric matter. The movie however does not spell out anything, like all great art, messages are communicated through subtle symbols and mysterious riddles.
Stanley Kubrick unexpectedly died only five days after submitting the final cut of the movie to Warner Bros, making Eyes Wide Shut his swan song. Considering that Eyes Wide Shut portrays an occult secret society that eliminates those who cross its path, some theories arose about Kubrick’s death and its suspicious nature. Did he reveal to the public too much, too soon? Maybe.
Let’s look at the main themes of Kubrick’s last creation.

The Modern Couple

The stars of Eyes Wide Shut were the “It” couple of 1999: Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman. Those who were expecting the movie to be a sort of voyeuristic experience showing hot scenes of the couple were probably very disappointed. The audience rather got a cold, egoistic and profoundly unsatisfied couple, one that seems to be tied together not by pure love, but by other factors, like convenience and appearances. While the couple is very “modern” and “upper-class”, the forces that keep it together are the result of basic, primal and almost animalistic behavior. If we look at the instinctive behavior of humans and animals, males primarily look for females that have good child-bearing qualities while females look for a strong provider. Remnants of this behavior still exist today as males tend to display wealth and power to attract females while females showcase their beauty to attract males. In Eyes Wide Shut, the couple perfectly follows that instinctive script.
Tom Cruise’s character is called Dr. Bill … as in dollar bill. Several times during the movie, Dr. Bill either waves his money or his “doctor badge” at people to get them to do what he wants. Bill is part of the upper class and his dealings with people of the lower class are often resolved with money.
In order to get this taxi driver to wait for him in front of the mention, Dr. Bill tears up a hundred dollar bill and promises him to give him the other half when he comes back. Dr. Bill's motto is probably "Everybody has a price".
In order to get this taxi driver to wait for him in front of the elite mansion, Dr. Bill tears up a hundred dollar bill and promises him to give him the other half when he comes back. Dr. Bill’s motto is probably “Everybody has a price”. Does his own wife have a price?
Played by Nicole Kidman, Alice lost her job in the art world and is now fully supported by her husband’s salary. While she lives very comfortably, Alice appears to be extremely bored with her life as a stay at home mother. The name Alice is most likely a reference to the main character of Alice in Wonderland – a fairy tale about a privileged girl who is bored with her life and who goes “through the looking glass” to end up in Wonderland. In Eyes Wide Shut, Alice is often shown staring at the looking glass – grooming herself or … maybe looking for something more to life.
Alice spends a lot of time in front of the mirror being pretty - maybe because it is the only "attribute" that keeps her in that social status. Her daughter, Helena (maybe named after Helena of Troy, the most beautiful woman in the world) follows in her footsteps.
Alice is often shown in front of the mirror and making herself pretty. At the beginning of the movie, almost everyone who talk to her mention her appearance. Her daughter Helena (maybe named after Helena of Troy, the most beautiful woman in the world) follows in her footsteps.
Promotional images for the movies feature Alice kissing Bill but looking at herself in the mirror, almost as if she was living in an alternate reality.
Promotional images for the movie feature Alice kissing Bill but looking at herself in the mirror, almost as if she was seeing an alternate reality.
While the couple shows signs of fatigue, Bill and Alice put on their “happy masks” when it is time to attend social events. Like the elite people they socialize with, there is a big difference between the facade they put on and reality.

Brushing With the Elite

Bill and Alice go to a classy party given by Victor Ziegler, one of Bill’s wealthy patients. Judging from Victor’s house, he is not simply rich, he is part of the ultra-elite. While his party is very elegant and is attended by highly cultured people, it doesn’t take long for the viewers to realize that this facade hides a disgusting dark side. Also, small details inserted by Kubrick hint to a link between the party and the occult ritual that occurs later in the movie.
When entering the party, the first thing  we see is this odd star-shaped Christmas decoration. This particular decoration is found throughout the house.
When entering the party, the first thing we see is this peculiar Christmas decoration. This eight-pointed star is found throughout the house.
The eight-pointed star is nearly identical to the star of Ishtar.
The star at Zeigler’s house is nearly identical to the ancient symbol of the star of Ishtar.
Knowing Kubrick’s attention to detail, the inclusion of the star of Ishtar in this party is not an accident. Ishtar is the Babylonian goddess of fertility, love, war and, mostly, sexuality. Her cult involved sacred prostitution and ritual acts – two elements we clearly see later in the movie.
“Babylonians gave Ishtar offerings of food and drink on Saturday. They then joined in ritual acts of lovemaking, which in turn invoked Ishtar’s favor on the region and its people to promote continued health and fruitfulness.”
- Goddess Ishtar, Anita Revel
Ishtar herself was considered to be the “courtesan of the gods” and had many lovers. While inspired in bed, she was also cruel to the men that got attached to her. These concept will constantly reappear in the movie, especially with Alice.
During the party, Bill and Alice go their separate ways and are both faced with temptation. Alice meets a man named Sandor Szavost who asks her about Ovid’s Art of Love. This book, written during the times of Ancient Rome, was essentially a “How to Cheat on Your Partner” guide, and was popular with the elite of the time. The first book opens with an invocation to Venus – the planet esoterically associated with lust. Interestingly enough, Ishtar (and her equivalents in other Semetic cultures) was considered to be the personification of Venus.
Sandor drinks from Alice's glass. This trick is taken right out of The Art of Love - maybe because its a subtle way of telling Alice that he wants to exchange fluids with her.
Sandor drinks from Alice’s glass. This trick is taken right out of The Art of Love and it sends Alice a message that is not very subliminal: “I want to exchange fluids with you”.
Sandor’s name might be a reference to the founder of the Church of Satan: Anton Szandor Lavey. Is this Kubrick’s way of saying that this man who urges Alice to cheat on her husband is a part of the occult elite and its decadent ways? The Hungarian man is apparently skilled in neuro-linguistic programming (NLP) as he keeps nearly hypnotizes Alice with well calculated phrases about the futility of married life and the necessity of pursuing pleasure in order to get her to cheat on her husband.
Meanwhile, Bill is discussing with two flirtatious models who tell him they want to take him to “where the rainbow ends”. While the meaning of this enigmatic phrase is never explicitly explained in the movie, symbols talk for themselves.

Rainbows Everywhere

Rainbows and multicolored lights appear throughout the movie, from the beginning to the end.
The name of the store where Bill rents his elite ritual costume: "Rainbow". The name of the store under it: "Under the Rainbow".
The name of the store where Bill rents his costume is called “Rainbow”. The name of the store under it: “Under the Rainbow”. Kubrick is trying to tell us something…Something involving rainbows.
As if to emphasize the theme of multicolored rainbows, almost every scene in the movie contains multicolored Christmas lights, giving most sets a hazy, dreamy glow.
Almost every time Bill enters a room, the first thing we see a multicolored Christmas decoration.
Almost every time Bill enters a room, the first thing we see are multicolored Christmas lights.
Sometimes Christmas lights are the often source of light on set.
Sometimes Christmas lights are the focal point of attention.
These lights tie together most scenes of the movie and makes them part of the same reality. There are however a few select scenes where there are absolutely no Christmas lights. The main one is Somerton palace – the palace where the secret society ritual takes place.
Sharply contrasting with the rest of the movie, the Sommerton palace is completely devoid of multicolored lights. Everything there looks sharp and crisp, contrarily to the hazy feel of the outside world.
Sharply contrasting with the rest of the movie, Sommerton  is completely devoid of multicolored lights. Everything about this place is in sharp opposition with the “outside world”.
In Eyes Wide Shut, there are therefore two worlds: The Christmas lights-filled “rainbow world”, where the masses wander around, trying to make ends meet and the other world… “where the rainbow ends”-  where the elite gathers and performs its rituals. Simply by seeing the contrast between the two worlds, we sense an almost insurmountable divide between them. Later, the movie will clearly show how those from the “rainbow world” cannot enter the other world.
So, when the models ask Bill the go “where the rainbow ends”, they probably refer to going “where the elite gathers and performs rituals”. It might also be about them being dissociated Beta Programming slaves. There are several references to Monarch mind control (read this article for more information) in the movie. Women who take part in elite rituals are often products of Illuminati mind control. In MK Ultra vocabulary, “going over the rainbow” means dissociating from reality and entering another persona (more on this later).
The models ask Bill to leave this fake facade of the "rainbow world" (there's a Christmas tree right behind them) and go to indulge in the debaucherous rituals of the occult elite.
The models ask Bill to leave the “rainbow world” (there’s a Christmas tree right behind them) to indulge in the debaucherous rituals of the occult elite.

Behind the Curtain

Bill’s flirting with the models is interrupted when Ziegler calls him to his bathroom. There, we get a first glance of “where the rainbow ends” – the dark truth about the elite.
Bill finds Ziegler in his gigantic bathroom dressing up and an almost unconscious woman.
Bill meets Ziegler in his gigantic bathroom. The man is dressing up and accompanied with a naked woman…who is not his wife. The woman is unconscious.
If we rewind a little, when Bill and Alice first entered the party, they were welcomed by Ziegler and his wife in a room filled with Christmas lights. We saw two respectable couples talking about respectable things. But when Bill goes “where the rainbow ends” (notice there are no Christmas lights in the bathroom) we see the ugly truth: Ziegler is not a respectable married man – he is found with a Beta programming slave who overdosed on goofballs. When the woman gains consciousness, Ziegler talks to her in an odd, paternal matter, highlighting the fact that he’s the master and she’s the slave. The luxurious setting of this scene is Kubrick’s way of saying that extreme wealth does not necessary equal high morals.
Ziegler then urges Bill to keep everything he just saw a secret. The world “where the rainbow ends” must never be revealed to the world. It operates in its own space, has its own rules and depends on the masses’ ignorance.

Questioning Marriage

While Alice ultimately rejected Sandor’s advances, she was nevertheless enticed by them. The next day, Alice tells Bill that she could have cheated on him at the party. When Bill tells his wife that he loves and trusts her, she completely loses it. She then proceeds to tells him a story about how she was once ready to cheat on him with a naval officer she met in a hotel. This cruel story highlights the “Ishtar” in Alice as she brings up in her husband feelings of jealousy, insecurity, betrayal and even humiliation. In short, Alice purposely summoned everything that is negative in relationships to pop Bill’s “love bubble”. This wake-up call prompts Bill to embark in a strange journey around New-York city, one that has multiple level of meanings and that leads him to the exact opposite of marriage: Anonymous, masked copulation with strangers in a ritual setting. Bill’s strange journey will be further analyzed in the second part of this series of articles.

Conclusion of Part One

The first part of this series of articles on Eyes Wide Shut took a broad look at Bill and Alice, a modern couple that has the “privilege” of brushing with the upper-echelon of New York. While everything appears great on the surface, Kubrick quickly tells the viewers to not be deceived by appearances and to not be impressed by exhibitions of wealth. Because, behind the “rainbow world”, exists a dark and disturbing reality, one that Kubrick exposes in many subtle ways throughout the movie.
While Bill and Alice are simply “guests” in the elite circle, they are nevertheless fascinated and attracted by it. They see in this lifestyle a way of fulfilling their dark and secret needs. In the next part of this series, we’ll look at the occult meaning of Bill’s journey – a story told by subtle symbols peppered across movie.
Stay tuned for part II of this series on “Eyes Wide Shut”.

Why Call it Intelligence?

By G. Murphy Donovan
The American Intelligence Community (IC) is starting to resemble a large cast of delinquents, a Faustian opera where bad behavior seeks constant rationalization and confirmation.  And like most bad behavior, the real remedy might not be that complicated.  Restraint is always an obvious solution; unfortunately, this is an obvious path seldom prescribed or taken by any branch of government these days, especially Intelligence agencies. 

Ironically, the 9/11 attack in New York, the worst warning failure since Pearl Harbor, produced a knee-jerk windfall for American Intelligence.  Like public school systems, failure became a kind of fiscal stimulus.  Subsequently, government agencies that could embed "terrorism" in their mission statements were showered with tax dollars. 

The logic behind such largess is bigness, the assumption that more is the key to effectiveness: more personnel, more toys, more facilities, and more deficit spending.  Unfortunately, these days, big Intelligence looks more like the problem than the solution.  And the performance deficit didn't begin with Benghazi or Boston. 

It took ten years for the American IC to find bin Laden.  Several of his thugs still serve today as propaganda martyrs at Gitmo, yet to be convicted of anything.  Nonetheless, all are hosted at American taxpayer expense, indefinitely, with three hots, a cot, and a Koran unsullied by the touch of infidels. 

The Israeli Mossad took out most of Black September, Palestinians responsible for the Munich massacre (1972), immediately after the atrocity.  The Russian FSB took less than two years to find and kill  Shamil Baysev, Chechen jihadist responsible for the children's massacre at Beslan (2004).  Rendition is seldom a measure of effectiveness for successful anti-terror doctrine.   

The Twin Towers failure in New York was not a one off either.  The slide may have begun with Vietnam era "systems analysis" where CIA and DOD cooked statistics to suggest there was "a light at the end of the tunnel. "  And then there was the surprise loss of Shia Iran (1979) to theocracy four years after the fall of Saigon.  Or maybe it was the surprise advent of nuclear weapons in North Korea and Pakistan.   

The Islam bomb was a watershed.  Surely the Shia in Iran could not let that Sunni advantage stand.  Alas, American intelligence fudged the call on the first bomb in Pakistan, and is still too timid to make a call on the coming Muslim bomb in Iran. 

The problem with truth is that it often makes action imperative.  Alter truth and the need to act can always be deferred. 

Or maybe it was the "shock and awe" of not finding any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq after being assured by national intelligence  estimates (see George Tenant and Colin Powell at the UN, 2003) that Saddam Hussein was so armed.  Were truths told:  Iraq 1 was about oil and Iraq 2 was about regime change. 

And let's be candid, since the invasion of Kuwait (1990), regime change has been the leitmotif of American and European foreign policy.  This sponsored change strategy is underwritten by an assertion that imperial Sunni Islam is a protected religion, not theocratic fascism or puerile imperial politics.

Regime change policies have two pillars.  First, Islam is said to be "one of the world's great religions," thus entitled to moral equivalence and related immunities.  A second axiom claims that the Sunni brand of irredentism is the "right side of history.  " See almost any public statement on these matters by John Brennan, James Clapper, or Barack Hussein Obama.    

Unfortunately, support to any Muslim faction in their millennial feuds is a little like, as Churchill might have said, "feeding crocodiles with the hope of being eaten last.  " Negotiating with the Taliban is just the first course in the coming South Asia buffet. 

The Arab (or Sunni) tilts in Intelligence and policy are expensive.  Playing defense is always more costly -- and often mistaken for appeasement.  And surrender, no matter the rhetoric, always has a political cost.  Such things are often managed with mendacity. 

All intelligence operatives lie; it's part of their job.  Heretofore, the mendacity was reserved for the enemy.  But now, if Jim Clapper can be believed, we need to lie to the folks who vote and pay the bills too.   Peace (talks) with the Taliban is the big lie du jour.  The only thing left to negotiate with south Asia Islamists is the terms of allied surrender and retreat. 

The Stuxnet and Prism disclosures are just symptoms of decay too, signs that American Intelligence has lost its original moorings.  All agencies begin with good ideas until the institution becomes the enemy of the original ideal.  Big Intelligence is an example of such excess and decay. 

And the failure of the IC to provide strategic warning is not the worst of it.   American Intelligence is frontloaded; omnivorous collection undone by inadequate processing and tainted analysis. 

Analysis is both the product and weakest link in the Intelligence chain.  The most expensive technical collection systems on earth feed the worst amateur estimates.  And this corrupt product sets the stage for all manner of national security folly. 

Just two examples suffice; John Brennan and Susan Rice.  Personalities, we might point out, promoted recently for being agenda merchants, accomplished liars, and not very modest about either skill.  Loyalty, not achievement or professional integrity, seems to be the only bullet on Obama staff resumes

Brennan is clearly the architect of the modern a priori paradigm, an analytic model which provides the "great religion" narrative for administration policy.  Brennan is the Intelligence Svengali if you will.   Decoupling Islamism from Islam at the White House is his great career achievement, even if has been a little like arguing that cheese and goats are unrelated. 

The Brennan ad vericundium analysis of Islam and Islamism is now fixed policy.  And with Brennan at CIA, any event or evidence that contradicts the "great religion" assertion is likely to be ignored, minimized, or spun.  There may be 16 Intelligence agencies in the IC, but CIA is still the big dog in the National Intelligence Estimates pound. 

The Susan Rice saga provides the lurid details of how these things are done, a sordid tale of how corrupt and malleable Intelligence analysis has become. 

The immediate IC assessment of the Benghazi slaughter was revised 12 times after passing through some unknown number of layers of bureaucratic review in the IC, at the NSC, and  over at the State Department.  In the process, facts and conclusions about terror and Islamism were altered.  All of which makes the collection of evidence, and any objective analysis of those facts, irrelevant. 

After the Benghazi talking point memo was 'scrubbed,' it was released to Ms.  Rice, then UN ambassador, as blessed Intelligence.  Rice was subsequently launched at the Sunday chat shows to sell a blatant lie, a sanitized edition of yet another national humiliation. 

The Sunni tilt or bias colors recent reportss and analysis of Egypt too.  The IC and CIA didn't predict another military coup in Cairo because such speculation would contradict the "Arab Spring" charade. 

If ground truth is bureaucratic revision or political spin, why call it an assessment or analysis, no less Intelligence? If national security analysis can be suborned by political hacks, the IC might be just another cabal of pricy beltway whores. 

James Clapper is one of the most impressive chaps working in Washington.  He began his military career as an enlisted Marine and rose to become an Air Force general.  Eventually, he became the Director of National Intelligence.  His technical achievements in Intelligence collection are impressive.  Prism, speaks for itself.   Somewhere along the way, however, Clapper also sold his soul. 

American national security has devolved into a very expensive game of liar's poker where the voting public needs to be kept in the dark too.  Jim Clapper admits as much in Congressional testimony.  In doing so, General Clapper tells us that truth and administration politics are mutually exclusive.  Deception in the name of national security might be justified, but lying in the name of venal politics makes American Intelligence a very frivolous extravagance. 

Alas, democracy usually dies behind closed doors. 

G.  Murphy Donovan is a former USAF Intelligence officer.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/07/why_call_it_intelligence.html#ixzz2YTssWoQN

Deals with foreign cable owners, secret court rulings broaden NSA spying potential

Leaked documents and other sources show some of the structure behind surveillance.

Undersea cables have been a communications fixture for a long time.
New information this weekend gave a glimpse into the efforts made by the US to establish a broad network of surveillance around the world. Some of the efforts involve using a proxy telecommunications company to manage the information gathered by local telecom companies in foreign countries, creating internal corporate cells with access to foreign-owned fiber optic cables, and using unchallenged rulings from Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Courts (FISC) to broaden the NSA's powers.
Brazilian newspaper O Globo and UK paper The Guardian published articles on Saturday alleging that the NSA was collecting and storing the e-mail and telephone records of millions of Brazilians through a program called FAIRVIEW. According to The Guardian, that program allows the US to partner with “a large US telecommunications company, the identity of which is currently unknown, and that US company then partners with telecoms in the foreign countries. Those partnerships allow the US company access to those countries' telecommunications systems, and that access is then exploited to direct traffic to the NSA's repositories.”
The Guardian article referenced an earlier post from Der Spiegel, which reported similarly broad surveillance of Germany's citizens. According to Spiegel, “the NSA systematically monitors and stores a large share of the country's telephone and Internet connection data,” which grabs “up to 20 million telephone calls and 10 million Internet data exchanges” on normal days.

Going to the source with “Team Telecom”

Another Saturday article in The Washington Post put some of the US' international spying into perspective as well.
While the details that the Post reported did not pertain to the FAIRVIEW program, they showed that the US has put pressure on foreign buyers of undersea fiber optic cable systems to allow the US to maintain access to the communications that pass through the cables.
Specifically, the Post used fiber optic network provider called Global Crossing as an example. The paper reports that a decade ago, the originally American firm prepared to be sold to an Asian firm, but the US worried about losing the potential to tap into the network when necessary. This concern stalled the sale of the company for months while a team of lawyers from the FBI and the departments of Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security negotiated a deal with the new owners.
These lawyers drew up an agreement in September 2003 called the “Network Security Agreement.” This publicly available document “became a model for other deals over the past decade as foreign investors increasingly acquired pieces of the world’s telecommunications infrastructure,” writes The Post. Today, the FCC is the enforcer of these security requirements during a network sale, using its own mob of lawyers, dubbed “Team Telecom,” to draw up lengthy agreements that allow the US to retain access to the information that flows over the cables.
Global Crossing's agreement, for example, stipulates that surveillance requests had to be handled by US citizens with the appropriate clearance and “sworn to secrecy” and that the firm had to have a “Network Operations Center” on US soil that could be accessed by government officials “with 30 minutes of warning.”
The Post continues:
The agreements, whose main purpose is to secure the US telecommunications networks against foreign spying and other actions that could harm national security, do not authorize surveillance. But they ensure that when US government agencies seek access to the massive amounts of data flowing through their networks, the companies have systems in place to provide it securely, say people familiar with the deals.
The article points out that cutting deals like this, between the US government and foreign firms, is made possible by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), which was set up by Gerald Ford in 1975 to review business deals with the interests of national security in mind. While this information is not necessarily new, it still gives some context as to how US surveillance works when it comes to foreign-owned infrastructure.

The secret supreme court

The New York Times meanwhile, detailed “more than a dozen classified rulings” from the court created by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) that broadened the power of the NSA to target suspects whose activities fall outside of terrorism and into the realms of “nuclear proliferation, espionage, and cyberattacks.” The article details a situation in which investigators would normally have had to get a warrant to view an e-mail attachment sent by an American citizen—but the NSA was allowed to collect it without that extra step because it thought the attachment contained a diagram pertaining to Iran's nuclear program.
While the Times did not publish any of the rulings, it says that they are over 100 pages long and show that FISA court judges are redefining their roles by “regularly assessing broad constitutional questions and establishing important judicial precedents, with almost no public scrutiny, according to current and former officials familiar with the court’s classified decisions.”
The paper attributes this power in part to a decision made six years ago, which gave the FISA court judicial oversight of the US' surveillance activities. The New York Times continues:
In one of the court’s most important decisions, the judges have expanded the use in terrorism cases of a legal principle known as the “special needs” doctrine and carved out an exception to the Fourth Amendment’s requirement of a warrant for searches and seizures, the officials said.
The special needs doctrine was originally established in 1989 by the Supreme Court in a ruling allowing the drug testing of railway workers, finding that a minimal intrusion on privacy was justified by the government’s need to combat an overriding public danger. Applying that concept more broadly, the FISA judges have ruled that the NSA’s collection and examination of Americans’ communications data to track possible terrorists does not run afoul of the Fourth Amendment, the officials said.
That legal interpretation is significant, several outside legal experts said, because it uses a relatively narrow area of the law—used to justify airport screenings, for instance, or drunken-driving checkpoints—and applies it much more broadly, in secret, to the wholesale collection of communications in pursuit of terrorism suspects. “It seems like a legal stretch,” William C. Banks, a national security law expert at Syracuse University, said in response to a description of the decision. “It’s another way of tilting the scales toward the government in its access to all this data.”
The secrecy of the FISA court is quite strict, and Ars documented a Supreme Court case in February 2013 in which American activists with foreign clients claimed that their communications were likely being scooped up in what they suspected was a dragnet surveillance operation authorized by the FISA court.
Back then, Justice Samuel Alito called the fears “speculative” and said the activists didn't have a right to sue at all without proof that they were being spied upon.