A Roadmap to Repair Pro Cycling   ~ i love the tour ! ...but geez guys "we" gotta do fucking sum~thing 2 bring "it" into the ....now !!!   Huh ?  the best "race" on THIS Planet & "it"  IS  ..still  lag~in Wayyyyyyy fucking behind ?  STOP the petty SHIT & ...fuck~in                         fig~it~the~fuck~out :)r   ...fuck me ! "we" used 2 fight war's wit ..sticks & stones humm    ... France  !  u's lucky bast~erd's    ..i loveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee the tour !  hehe

 http://www.theouterline.com/
Many recommendations have been made over the past few years about how to fix pro cycling, but too many have been vague promises or empty platitudes, lacking substantive detail or goals.  Here, we present a new “roadmap” for the future – a comprehensive, specific, measurable and actionable four-point plan to truly repair the sport.  Written in the spirit of influencing true and lasting change, this report looks from the outside in, to bring fresh perspectives and illuminate new paths to the future.
This sport has declared a “new beginning” many times before. This time, cycling has to make it stick.  The stakeholders of pro cycling should evaluate and seriously consider the recommendations in this roadmap – in order to halt what has too often been a race to the bottom, and instead begin to create a race to the top.
Download the full Roadmap report, or a report summary below.

InfoWars article on Sandy Hook book ban scrubbed – even from Google cache 

by StMA • Guest Posts, News • Tags: alternative media, Amazon bans Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, censorship, InfoWars scrubs article on Sandy Hook book ban

From Fellowship of the Minds

InfoWars Article SCRUBBED (Sandy Hook Coverup)?

By “Barry Soetoro, Esq”
After 1 month of strong sales, Amazon suddenly banned the new book, Nobody Died At Sandy Hook. The book was pulled from Amazon.com, then deleted from customers’ Kindles.
After Amazon pulled the book, Alex Jones’ InfoWars noticed – and published this article exposing Amazon’s book ban. Here’s a screenshot of the article:


To draw attention to their article, InfoWars tweeted a link:

But within hours after that article was published, InfoWars suddenly deleted it from the Web. The InfoWars article simply vanished – without explanation.
This left onlookers wondering who removed the InfoWars article – and why.
Fortunately, some web services save copies of material. Thus, the deleted InfoWars article was recovered – in its entirety – from a copy stored by Google Cache:

As folks reacted to this curious censorship (by Amazon; then by InfoWars), the Google Cache copy of the InfoWars article was suddenly deleted as well – replaced with this “404 Error” message.
Here is a screenshot of the deleted InfoWars article, “Sandy Hook Truth Book Banned By Amazon,” at Google Cache prior to deletion (Meme text added):

So, we have:

1. Amazon banning Nobody Died at Sandy Hook while continuing to sell 19 other Sandy Hook books.
2. InfoWars writing and publishing an article about Amazon’s banning of that book.
3. InfoWars suddenly deleting their own article the same day it was published.
4. InfoWars (or some other party) asking Google Cache to remove all traces of the deleted InfoWars article by scrubbing the cached version from Google servers.

All that effort makes no sense – unless the government is hiding something. Why ban the book to begin with? Why delete the InfoWar’s article about the book ban? Further, why scrub the article from even the cache, so that there is no longer even a trace of the article on the Web?
The State Police Photo
Was InfoWars ordered to delete their article because it includes this picture credited to the Connecticut State Police – showing police preparations at Sandy Hook Elementary School BEFORE the alleged massacre happened?

Look at that photo: that’s not how folks behave at a “school massacre” where 27 people lay dead in pools of blood. Why is CT Chief Medical Examiner Wayne Carver casually lounging outside the school, while 20 kids presumably lay inside, freshly murdered? Why is everyone relaxed like they’re enjoying a break on a movie set?
Indeed, some believe the CT State Police photograph was taken during preparations – before any windows were broken – the day before the hoax “went live.”
That same photo — and more — is in the banned book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook.
InfoWars nobly trumpets that “there’s a war on for our mind” but InfoWars is fighting that war on our behalf. So why, then, has InfoWars joined the nationwide blackout on Amazon’s banning of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook?
Even the FBI agrees that nobody died at Sandy Hook – since the FBI’s own crime report shows “ZERO” murders in Newtown CT during 2012:

Why Censor The Book?
If Nobody Died at Sandy Hook is “nonsense,” why doesn’t the Regime simply ignore it? Why get the book removed from Amazon (and Barnes & Noble); get an article about the censorship taken down from InfoWars; and then SCRUB the already-removed InfoWars article from Google cache?
The answer is clear: Nobody Died at Sandy Hook is “over the target,” and that’s why it must be taken down. Sandy Hook, the “biggest school shooting in US history,” was a carefully planned hoax to steal your guns, take your freedom, and terrorize your children.
Eric Holder even announced his plan to subvert the US Constitution on CSPAN (video) – by “Brainwashing people” against guns.
The Sandy Hook “shooting” hoax is that treason, foisted on unsuspecting Americans.
To overcome this Amazon/InfoWars censorship, the banned book has been made available as a free PDF: Nobody Died At Sandy Hook.
If you haven’t seen a documentary on the Sandy Hook hoax that repeatedly was taken down from YouTube, watch it now: We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook.
Also see these interviews with James Fetzer (co-editor of Nobody Died at Sandy Hook):
[VIDEO] James Fetzer Interview: Sandy Hook (AMAZON) book ban
[VIDEO] Amazon & Infowars Censor Sandy Hook BOOK!
Barry Soetoro, Esq is the pen-name of a syndicated columnist focused on Fake Shootings and State Terror. Recently, Barry explored the Newtown CT “massacre” and the background of “Barack Hussein Obama.”

∞

For all the posts FOTM has published on the Sandy Hook hoax, click here.
To read/download the banned book in PDF format, click here: NobodyDiedAtSandyHook.
If you want a hard copy (sure to be a collector’s item!), Fetzer found an alternative printer/distributor for Nobody Died at Sandy Hook — Moon Rock Books. Click here. Check it out and let others know. The pdf will remain available to the public for free.

THE ALCHEMY OF FUSION: GERMAN WENDELSTEIN-7 SLATED TO START THIS MONTH

Posted on December 9, 2015 by Joseph P. Farrell • http://gizadeathstar.com/2015/12/the-alchemy-of-fusion-german-wendelstein-7-slated-to-start-this-month/

Mr. R.B. shared this article, and it's one of those that's significant in so many ways it it hard to know where to begin:
German fusion machine to kick off in December
You'll note that this is a "hot fusion/containment" system, reliant upon microwaves:

The 425 tonne installation took 1.1 million construction hours spread over nine years, but it’s definitely worth it; one by one, all the individual systems have been tested and passed with flying colors – so it’s time to put this whole thing into motion.
...
The heating system includes 10 megawatts of microwaves, for up to 10 seconds, and can deliver 1 megawatt for 50 seconds during operational phase 1 (OP-1). The initial runs from December and January will only test the feasibility of the reactor type. If it is successful, then it can serve as a blueprint for a demo fusion plant – but that’s a pretty big if.

As the article notes, if this method of hot-fusion and containment is successful, then the German device effectively becomes a prototype proof-of-concept reactor for the application to energy needs. Not surprisingly, Germany is in the thick of this development, for as a major world economy, Germany's energy resources are, to say the least, lacking. It must import its petroleum and natural gas needs.
Consider the geopolitical implications of successful tests of that one fact alone: one of the world's top five economies(or top six, depending on which list one consults), would instantly have a gateway technology able to provide - at least theoretically - most of its industrial energy needs, and over time, perhaps energy even for transportation. At that juncture, it's reliance upon foreign energy sources - Russian or otherwise - is diminished over the long term.
But such a technology will not long stay confined to Germany; it will spread - like wildfire, to other nations, most quickly to Europe, which, faced as it is with a refugee crisis, with growing Muslim terrorist threats, and reliant upon Middle Eastern energy supplies, will evaporate.
The bottom high-octane-speculation line here is that virtually all the terrorist threat that the world faces from radical Islam, whether state-sponsored or not, will be subject to increasing financiall stress, because the financial basis of power that supports it will be instantly rendered obsolescent. And with this, one will also see a transformation of the financial system, for obviously, the petro-dollar financial system will evoraporate, perhaps not instantly, but quickly. One might speak of "Fusion-finance", of "fusion florins" or "deuterium-ducats" rather than petrodollars.
Germany, of course, knows all of this, and it does raise the question: if these tests are successful, what's the long-term plan for the financial world? For consider, there is the ITAR fusion project in France(little noticed and discussed), yet another multi-national effort in alternative energy, there is Dr. Andrea Rossi and his E-CAT cold fusion reactor, which recently won patents in the USA, and now, this different type of hot fusion reactor in Germany. The bottom line here, is that an epochal change in the world's energy supply, and hence, the entire financial system, is coming. Germany and Europe know this... Hopefully, those nations will show discretion on whom they allow into such projects and which nations - if they are successful - with whom they share it.

Eyewitness to San Bernardino Terror Attack Still Says ‘three tall white men did it’

By Counter Current News

Global Research, December 08, 2015

Counter Current News 7 December 2015

Region: USA

Theme: Law and Justice, Police State & Civil Rights

The controversy over what really happened in San Bernardino last week is just beginning to heat up. Right after the lawyers for the alleged attacker’s family said that they do not believe the suspects did it, yet another eyewitness to the attacks maintained that the real attackers were three, tall, athletic Caucasian men in tactical gear.
“It looked like their skin color was white […] they appeared to be tall”, the eyewitness said.
Investigators with the ATF recovered police issued firearms from the alleged shooters.
This detail was accidentally mentioned by 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate Carly Fiorina during a press interview. After this was stated, the mainstream media never mentioned it again.
There were also widely-reported active shooter drills that had been taking place near the crime scene. Early reports claimed these were taking place hours before the attack. Later the narrative changed to the day before.
One eyewitness to the attacks, Sally Abdelmageed, was an employee at Inland Medical Center where the attack occurred.
How could she have interpreted two shooters, a man and a petite woman who weighed less than 100 lbs, as three Caucasian, athletic-built military men?

Witness describes the San Bernardino shooting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwTYja7GXcY

Abdelmageed explained to CBS News that “I heard shots fired and it was from you know an automatic weapon.”
She added that it was all “very unusual. Why would we hear shots?”

“As we looked out the window a second set of shots goes off […] and we saw a man fall to the floor. Then we just looked and we saw three men dressed in all black, military attire, with vests on they were holding assault rifles,”

she continued.
“As soon as they opened up the doors to building three […] one of them […] started to shoot into the room.”
She explained that while she

“couldn’t see a face, he had a black hat on […] black cargo pants, the kind with the big puffy pockets on the side […] long sleeve shirt […] gloves […]huge assault riffle […] six magazines […] I just saw three dressed exactly the same.”

The reporter then asked again, to be sure, “You are certain you saw three men?”
“Yes,” Abdelmageed reaffirmed.
“It looked like their skin color was white. They look like they were athletic build and they appeared to be tall.”
The CBS reporter then shot down her eyewitness account, reminding views that the FBI just told them that one of the shooters was a woman, and that the third shooter didn’t exist.
“And of course we just learned that one suspect was a woman,” they dismissed.
Watch the video report below…(US only)
Can anyone explain why eyewitness sources are being dismissed in favor of one of the most bizarre narratives in the history of law enforcement and counter-terrorism?
(Article by M. David and Jackson Marciana)

The original source of this article is Counter Current News

Copyright © Counter Current News, Counter Current News, 2015