President Obama Demands Critics Tell Him What's Wrong With TPP; Of Course We Can't Do That Because He Won't Show Us The Agreement  ~ folks these ass~pipes & their "elites" controllers/handlers ... gotta fucking gooooooooo !!!    oh  ah  um & LEAVE OUR shit at the door ...u's ass pipe sucking parasitic degenerate  rat bastards  :o    Um gonna do my "Christian" "duty"  ob~li~ga~tion & "pray " fer my "leaders"  O Lord  ..please kill this scum ...as quickly  as POSSIBLE !  ... ah um amen :)r   .. fucking a folks does this shit never end  Lol  which is the God of Love/Honesty/Openness/Straight forward ~ness   & what's that fucks name who IS EVIL??? um ah oh  yea ? Sa~O~bam~ our ass's ~tan  or sum~thin like that  Hehe u know "who" the fuck i mean  Lol or

from the most-transparent-administration-in-history dept ~ Our fucking ass's   Oops

President Obama is apparently quite annoyed by the fact that his own party is basically pushing against his "big trade deals" (that are not really about trade). Senator Elizabeth Warren has been pretty aggressive in trashing the TPP agreement, highlighting the fact that the agreement is still secret (other than the bits leaked by Wikileaks). In response, President Obama came out swinging against the critics of TPP arguing that "they don't know what they're talking about."

He insists that it's unfair to compare TPP to NAFTA because they're different deals:

“You need to tell me what’s wrong with this trade agreement, not one that was passed 25 years ago.”

Well, Mr. President, I would love to do that, but I can't because you and your USTR haven't released the damn text. It takes an insane lack of self-awareness for the guy who once declared his administration "the most transparent in history" to demand people tell him what's wrong with his trade agreement, when that agreement is kept entirely secret.

Furthermore, multiple experts concerning things like the corporate sovereignty ISDS provisions and the intellectual property chapters have gone into great detail as to why the leaked versions have problems. They're not complaining about NAFTA. They're actually complaining about the latest drafts -- but the USTR won't acknowledge them because they're talking about leaked versions.

In fact, the only real complaints I've seen relating to NAFTA concern the fact that the government says one thing about these big agreements, but the reality is something different.

Of course, he attacks the fact that people are complaining about the secrecy as well, by arguing (misleadingly) that the deal is not at all secret:

“The one that gets on my nerves the most is the notion that this is a ‘secret’ deal,” Obama said. “Every single one of the critics who I hear saying, ‘this is a secret deal,’ or send out emails to their fundraising base saying they’re working to prevent this secret deal, can walk over today and read the text of the agreement. There’s nothing secret about it.”

I'm a critic. I can't walk over today and read the text of the agreement. Obviously, President Obama is only talking about elected members of Congress. But that's not what they're complaining about. They're complaining about the fact that the American public cannot see the text of the document or discuss the specifics of what's in there. And that's absolutely true.

And even the fact that members of Congress can actually see the document is tremendously misleading. Yes, members of Congress are allowed to walk over to the USTR and see a copy of the latest text. But they're not allowed to take any notes, make any copies or bring any of their staff members. In other words, they can only read the document and keep what they remember in their heads. And they can't have their staff members -- the folks who often really understand the details -- there to explain what's really going on.

And it all comes back to the point that Senator Warren has been making for a long time: that former USTR Ron Kirk has admitted that a big reason why they keep the document secret is that when they tried being more transparent in the past, the agreement failed. As Warren says, if being transparent with the American public means the agreement will fail, then the problem is with the agreement, not the public.

“When I keep on hearing people repeating this notion that it’s ‘secret,’ I gotta say, it’s dishonest,” Obama continued. “And it’s concerning when I see friends of mine resorting to these kinds of tactics.”

Here's a little test: can we see the current TPP documents today? No? Then it's secret. Claiming otherwise is what's dishonest.   ~  i gotta say it, somebody's gotta stand the fuck UP & say  IT ...ah um excuse me mr. prez ....your fucking pants R on fire   Oops Lol   ... yea no shit   , yer pants  um hum yep yer pants ....

We are on the "Fast Track" to world Fascism

Posted by George Freund on April 26, 2015

Obama and Monsanto lobbyists, and a handful of others have creatively passed the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) on a "Fast Track" to be ratified by the Senate soon, a destructive trade agreement that is "NAFTA on steroids."

Bill Clinton's NAFTA did in-fact create that "sucking sound" of jobs and further caused small business entrepreneurs (the middle class) to close their doors, which America appears to be a third world country as you drive through small towns. Boarded-up windows and weeds growing along the road, America was transformed into the North American Union....and YOU could not stop it !

The borders are wide open and the small time Mexican farmer has been forced out-of-business as a result of NAFTA's agricultural expansion that only benefits large agro.

Now we have the final nail in the coffin...the TPP cannot be debated in the senate and THEY cannot read the treaty, but must pass it first to understand what it actually means for America. However, Obama and his minions agreed to a maximum of 88 seconds for each opposing view, while the yes votes are encouraged to proceed without interruption.

If the TPP is ratified in the senate, we as the former United States, will enter a New World Order phase that (pretty much) destroys many aspects of the Constitution. The details are being hidden from public view....

However....one major and critical aspect of the TPP will give the GMO giant, Monsanto...free reign on the world with their dangerous and tainted seeds. Other food products laced with (Round-up pesticide) a.k.a. Genetically Modified Organisms will be forced-on several countries that currently ban GMO produce.

The pay-off to those countries is more job creation (on their soil) and mega giant corporations in America will benefit by cheap labor, here and there. Farmers that survived NAFTA in the U.S. and refuse to use Monsanto's poisonous seeds, will be pushed-out and finished.

This is nothing more than a corrupt government, controlled by the world globalist elites, selling America to mega corporations (owned by the globalist elites) and will further enslave every American and eventually every person on the planet. This is not only "Fast Track" for the TPP, but is also a "Fast Track" to FASCISM.

IT MUST BE STOPPED.....

DB

THE SPACE JUNK MEME JUST WILL NOT GO AWAY: NASA’S UFO SPACE JUNK, DARPA’S SPACE JUNK AND LASERS

Posted on April 28, 2015 by Joseph P. Farrell • http://gizadeathstar.com/2015/04/the-space-junk-meme-just-will-not-go-away-nasas-ufo-space-junk-darpas-space-junk-and-lasers/

Last week, you'll recall, I blogged about the article in RT complaining about spy satellites disguised as space junk that - in the unusual phrase of RT - was "space affiliated." It seems to be a meme that is being pushed. And that brings us to today's set of articles, shared by various readers, which, when considered together, and with my previous blogs on space junk, add up to a very strange and puzzling picture. Consider, first, this article shared by Mr. N.T:
What NASA Accidentally Caught On Film Outside Of The Space Station Is Chilling
Now, the important little bit of information, as the article itself implies, is that one explanation for the somewhat strange "thing" seen on the video is that it is "space junk":

"The logical explanation here is that the UFO in question is just a piece of space junk. It could also be one of two resupply vehicles that were servicing the ISS at the time. However, according to NASA, both of the resupply ships were docked at the space station when this video was taken. So maybe it really is a UFO, after all"

But calling something "space junk" in the aftermath of the RT article about spy satellites disguised as space junk is no longer quite the dismissive phrase that it used to be, especially since RT made it "clear" that the spy satellites-cum-space-junk were "state affiliated." Now, put that one on the shelf for a moment, and then consider this article, from 2013, shared by Ms. K.M.:
Researchers Want to Blast Space Junk Out of Orbit With a Laser From ISS
The headline says it all: some people want to put a laser weapon on the International Space station to blast such "space junk" from the skies. Now, as if that's not enough, Mr. M.D. shared these articles from 2011, articles reminiscent of the recent deal between the German space agency and an American company to go out and "grab and snab" that "space junk":
DARPA Wants to Recycle Space Junk Into New Satellites
How to Clean Up Space Junk: DARPA's Orbital Catcher's Mitt
As Mr. M.D. put it in his email, and as many of you have probably already guessed, if one suspected that some of this "space junk" was spy satellites with, as RT put it, a "state affiliation," then a perfect way to camouflage a "retrieval" operation of "grab and snab" would be to disguise it as a recovery and "environmentally friendly" recycling effort.
When one puts all this together with what we blogged about last week, an interesting scenario, one in line with our trademark high octane speculation, begins to emerge, having the following components:

1. There are spy satellites disguised as space junk in orbit around the Earth;
2. As was seen last week, these satellites have become a concern to Russia, the US, and Japan;
3. The origin of these satellites appears to be in question, since the Russians referred to them as "state affiliated," raising the following possibilities as to what the meaning of 'affiliation" might be:
   1. they might be corporate satellites with a corporation doing heavy business with a particular nation-state;
   2. they might be satellites of an organization heavily associated by ties of history, culture, or economy, with a nation-state;
   3. they might be satellites of some extraterrestrial origin having an "affiliation" with a particular nation-state (Black Knight satellite?);
4. The Japanese earlier suggested putting laser weapons on the space station to destroy "space junk";
5. recent EVAs on the space station (extra-vehicular activities) jave captured the presence of "something," either a UFO, or "space junk"(which suggests a spy satellite) monitoring those activities;
6. both DARPA and the German Space agency have proposed grab and snab technologies to "recover" and "recycle" space debris, which could be a convenient cover story for the recovery of technology, in order to determine the level of technology and possibly its real origin.

These considerations, plus the possibility that vast amounts of money in the form of "electronic liquidity" are going off planet, suggest that something huge is taking place right about our heads, one affecting the policy decisions of major powers regarding space, and one perhaps having huge financial implications.

74 NASA Scientists Been killed In The Last Two Years. What's Going On?...& Bankers ???

Unusually high number of scientist deaths in recent years

Posted by: Neon Nettle  |@NeonNettle

 on 9th April 2015 http://www.neonnettle.com/sphere/279-74-nasa-scientists-been-killed-in-the-last-two-years-what-s-going-on-

© press

NASA Scientist Alberto Behar died in a plane crash in January (2015) in Los Angeles – making a total of 74 Scientist dead in 2 years. Alberto Behar

NASA Scientist Alberto Behar died in a plane crash in January (2015) in Los Angeles – making a total of 74 Scientist dead in 2 years.
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO
Alberto Behar had helped to prove that there had once been water on Mars, having worked on two missions to Mars. He was also a robotics expert who researched how robots function in harsh environments (such as under water or inside volcanoes).
The unusually high number of scientist deaths in recent years has made people question whether this death was suspicious or not.
Behar was an expert pilot; he was a flight instructor for both planes and helicopters – the weather conditions were clear and for some reason his plane just started to lose altitude. The Van Nuys Airport pilot Kashif Khursheed said “I can’t see what would be the cause of something like this. He was very knowledgeable, competent and thorough.”
This is just one of the most recent cases of a prominent scientists suspicious death, over the past two years 74 leading medical and NASA scientists havedied, almost all are officially labelled suicide or an accident. Glenn Thomas was a World Health Organisation spokesperson; he was reportedly an expert onEbola and AIDS, he was aboard MH17 when it was shot down with approximately 100 other researchers.
Joep Lange, a leading AIDS researcher and former president of the International AIDS Society (IAS) was also aboard MH17. They were all on their way to an international AIDS conference. With one fell swoop a large portion of the leading AIDS experts were killed before they could attend a global conference.

© press

Shane Truman Toddwas an electrical engineer. He was working on a top-secret “one of a kind” machine for the Chinese when he turned up dead.

Another Dead NASA Scientist "What Do They Know"?

Melissa Ketunuti, 35, was a paediatrician who specialised in cancer; she also worked on an AIDS fellowship in Botswana. She was hogtied and set on fire in the basement of her home in Philadelphia. Dr Anne Szarewski, 53, was a cervical cancer expert; she pioneered the cervical cancer vaccine.
Ketunuti was found dead in her London home in December 2013. Her husband spent hours drilling through the front door that she had locked from the inside, when he found her she was dead, to this day no one knows what killed her. An inquiry into her death was launched but nothing conclusive was ever found.
Perhaps one of the most controversial scientist deaths in the last few years was that of Shane Truman Todd, 31. In June 2012 he was found dead, his body was in morgue in Singapore, he was an electrical engineer.
He was working on a top-secret “one of a kind” machine for the Chinese that was believed to be a defence weapon. Shane told his family that he was not happy with what he was doing and he feared for his life, he was allegedly being asked to compromise U.S security.
He quit his job and was due to leave China and fly home but died a week before his flight after his last day at work building this unknown machine. Foul play was suspected and his family began campaigning for the truth, Chinese official said they would look into the matter and try and determine if it was murder or suicide but as of yet there are no answers. 
These are just a tiny fraction of the scientist that have died under suspicious circumstances, you can read about mysterious scientist deaths by clicking here. All of these people are either leading medical experts or leading engineers, you have to ask what could they have known that would have led to their deaths? Or could it all simply be coincidence?
In a time where conspiracy is commonplace it is increasingly difficult to differentiate between what could be a conspiracy and what is simply an unfortunate event. It is incredibly suspect why so many of these deaths are so odd, the people who were killed would have access to sensitive informationthat government officials may not want disclosed.