Tuesday, July 22, 2014

The Hidden Life of the Kennedys : The Elite Dynasty That Got Decimated (Pt. II)              ~   it just truly amazing ..nobody wants 2  c the ....NAZI's  ....connection ???

Jul 21st, 2014 | http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/hidden-life-kennedys-elite-dynasty-got-decimated-pt-ii/



John F. Kennedy was an iconic President who defined an entire era. Although he was placed in office by his powerful father, it seems JFK attempted to cut the strings that turn U.S. presidents into puppets of the country’s shadow government. We will look at the hidden side of the John F. Kennedy presidency.

leadkennedy2a
In the first part of the series we looked at the rise to power of the Kennedys. You should read that first.

John F. Kennedy’s assassination was nothing less than a turning point in American history. The gunshot that hit Kennedy’s head brutally awakened an innocent American public who then entered a turbulent age of metamorphosis. Roused from the peaceful slumber that was the post-war, baby-boom era of the 50′s, the American public saw a drastic change after the trauma of JFK’s death. This new era was not-so-coincidentally linked with the rise of television and mass media in American homes, which became a powerful engine of change.
JFK was the perfect face of this new era. His natural charisma and charming manners were fully exploited by mass media to turn this politician into a celebrity beloved by the entire country. The feelings of hope and optimism engendered by JFK were not only merely an illusion, however. Records show that he actually tried to bring significant change to his country, by going head-on with the most powerful organizations controlling the country: the CIA, the Federal Reserve and big oil companies.
Let’s look at JFK’s presidency.

The President for a New Era of Mass Media

JFK was the ultimate prototype of a political figure evolving in the era of mass media. Even before he became President, JFK and his team fully embraced the power of television to gain widespread support. In 1960, Kennedy faced Richard Nixon in the first televised debate in U.S. history and its outcome is now legendary. While Nixon appeared pale, sickly, sweaty and nervous, JFK hired the services of a studio makeup artist to obtain a TV-friendly, healthy glow.
During the presidential debates of 1960, JFK had the presence of a television personality while Nixon kept wiping sweat off his face.
During the presidential debates of 1960, JFK had the calm presence of a seasoned television personality while Nixon kept wiping sweat off his face, making him appear as the stereotypical “bad guy” we’d see in a movie.
Polls after the debate were quite telling: A slight majority of radio listeners deemed Nixon to be the winner of the debate, while an overwhelming majority of television viewers considered JFK to be the winner. The debate provided a valuable lesson to all future politicians: In the era of television, politics are henceforth about appearances, visceral gut impressions. and sound bites. While watching candidates debate in their living rooms, people could now conclude: “I like this man” or “I don’t trust this man” without even listening to what was said. The outcome of the debate was an important factor leading to JFK’s victory. But that was only the beginning of the “Camelot era”, a King Arthur-inspired term to define the popularity of Kennedy’s era.
After taking office, JFK’s inauguration speech shook the nation. It is now widely considered to be the best speech in American history. It was fully adapted to this new era of mass media and contained the ultimate political soundbite, one that is echoed in mass media to this day.
‘And so, my fellow Americans – ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country.’
It was not long before the Kennedys became full-fledged celebrities, evolving in the same media arena as movie stars and pop singers. They appeared in magazine spreads and their fashion sense even contributed to new style trends.
While JFK was the most powerful man in the world, he also used the power of media to convey a casual and relatable side - one that is appreciated by the general public (especially women). Most politicians following him will attempt to exploit the "relaxed family man" side, with varying success.
While JFK was the most powerful man in the world, he also used the power of media to convey a casual and family-oriented side, which was relatable to the general public.
JFK was also the first President to have press conferences and public addresses broadcast live on television, marking a new way of conducting politics in the U.S. In short, Kennedy was the first President to be fully present in the arena of mass media, using his charm, charisma, and sex appeal to create a worldwide phenomenon, forever changing the world of politics.
While mass media great amplified every aspects of JFK’s life, it was his untimely death that caused one of the biggest mass media moments in history. The hours, days and months following his assassination were a turning point in journalism, as we witnessed a new era of live television news feeds.
The moment when a shaken Walter Cronkite removed his glasses and announced the death of JFK is probably one of the most intense moments in television history. It also marks the transition period between old-time written news and live television coverage.
Walter Cronkite announcing JFK’s death is a defining moment in U.S. history. Visibly shaken, Cronkite removed his glasses and addressed a nation that was in complete shock. This moment also marks the transition period between old-time written news and live television coverage.
Because JFK’s aura was so amplified by mass media, his death caused a shock-wave of trauma and dismay across America and the world. It was one of the first mega-rituals conducted by a shadow elite … but far from the last. After JFK, several personalities were literally built by mass media to then die and cause shock and trauma. The era of mass media also corresponds to a new era of control by the occult elite.

Links With the Darker Side of Hollywood

While JFK enjoyed the status of a Hollywood celebrity, he also partook in the darker aspects of it. During the 1960s, Hollywood decidedly steered towards sexual exploitation, mind control and dark occultism, and JFK was close friends with its main figures, namely : Frank Sinatra, Peter Lawford, and Sammy Davis, Jr., a.k.a “the rat pack”. According to Fritz Springmeier, these men were MK slave handlers, linked with Anton LaVey’s Church of Satan.
Many of the movies and shows use Monarch slaves as actors & performers. They also use lots of slave handlers such as Frank Sinatra, Peter Lawford, & Bob Hope. And occasionally the use programmers such as Anton LaVey, Jerry Lee Lewis. (…)
Frank Sinatra has been a slave handler. He has handled Bob Hope’s slaves, when Bob Hope has lent them to the Rat Pack (which consisted of Dean Martin, Frank, Sammy Davis, Jr. Peter Lawford & Joey Bishop). Frank Sinatra spends time with the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds.
- Fritz Springmeier, The Illuminati Formula to Create a Mind Control Slave
Recently released FBI files describes “sex parties” attended by the Kennedy brothers, Sammy Davis, Jr., Frank Sinatra (an MK slave handler) and Marilyn Monroe (a Beta Programming slave).
28tgvwy
An FBI file describing a party that included the Kennedys, members of the Rat Pack, and Marilyn Monroe.
Sammy Davis Jr. with Anton LaVey, the head of the Church of Satan - a powerful organization that put a "Hollywood" facade on hardcore Satanism.
Sammy Davis Jr. with Anton LaVey, the head of the Church of Satan – a powerful organization that put a “Hollywood” facade on hardcore Satanism.
JFK’s string of affairs with various partners during his Presidency is no secret today. The two most famous women associated with JFK are Marilyn Monroe and Jayne Mansfield, two blonde movie stars with strikingly similar personas. There is, however, another point they both have in common: They were both “partners” of Anton LaVey. In fact, Mansfield was a “High Priestess” of his Church of Satan.
In San Francisco for the 1966 Film Festival, Mansfield visited the Church of Satan with Sam Brody (her lawyer and boyfriend) to meet Anton LaVey, the church’s founder. LaVey awarded Mansfield a medallion and the title “High Priestess of San Francisco’s Church of Satan”. The Church of Satan proclaimed Jayne a pledged member, and she displayed a framed membership certification in her pink bedroom. The media enthusiastically covered the meeting and the events surrounding it, identifying her as a Satanist and romantically involved with LaVey. That meeting remained a much-publicized and oft-quoted event of her life, as well as the history of the Church of Satan
- Strait, Raymond (1974). Tragic Secret Life of Jayne Mansfield.

Pictures of Jaynes Mansfield with Anton LaVey
Pictures of Jayne Mansfield with Anton LaVey
The link between Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield, Anton LaVey and JFK is not simply the result of a coincidence. Behind his theatrical facade, Anton LaVey was a MKULTRA handler who programmed Monroe and Mansfield to be Beta Kittens.
“Anton LaVey has been the mind-control handler/programmer of a number of Hollywood actors & actresses, including Jayne Mansfield and Marilyn Monroe, who both serviced him as sexual slaves”.
- Anton Szandor LaVey, Whale.to
“Marilyn Monroe was an orphan, and during her infancy the Illuminati/CIA programmed her to be a Monarch slave. Before becoming an actress, while she was still a stripper, she spent time with the founder of the Church of Satan Anton LaVey. Victims of LaVey have pointed him out as a mind-control programmer.”
- Ibid.
Marilyn Monroe speaks with John F. Kennedy after famously singing him "Happy Birthday Mr. President". Wearing her iconic diamond-studded dress (diamonds are associated with Presidential Models in MK symbolism), the song was actually a Beta Kitten sensually singing to the man she is servicing.
Marilyn Monroe speaks with John F. Kennedy after famously singing him “Happy Birthday, Mr. President”. Wearing her iconic diamond-studded dress (diamonds are associated with Presidential Models in MK symbolism), the performance was actually a Beta Kitten sensually singing to the man she is servicing.
Like most MK slaves, Monroe and Mansfield died young (at age 36 and 34 respectively) and in odd circumstances (“overdose” and car accident).

A Bold President

Despite all of the partying and distractions, JFK was a busy and dedicated President. While he dealt with gigantic issues such as the rise of civil rights and the Cold War, he also dealt with lesser-known issues. Indeed, JFK quickly understood who was in charge in Washington and that it was not him, the supposed democratically-elected President. It was the shadowy elite who controlled the country from behind the scenes, through various powerful groups, who worked completely independently from the government. In what appears to be an attempt to bring power and influence back to democratically elected representatives, JFK clashed with the CIA, the Federal Reserve, big oil and even the military-industrial complex. Almost all of the policies adopted that went against these groups were quickly reversed after his death.

Against the Fed?

The Federal Reserve System was created in 1913 to become the central banking system of the United States. However, despite its “governmental name”, the Federal Reserve System is not federal. It is not even governmental. Although it was created by an act of Congress, the Federal Reserve is completely independent from the government. It is essentially a private organization owned by twelve credit monopolies, which are owned by the most powerful banking families in the world.
Black Law’s Dictionary defines the Fed as a:
“Network of twelve central banks to which most national banks belong and to which state chartered banks may belong. Membership rules require investment of stock and minimum reserves.”
The Federal Reserve is the entity that lends money to banks, who then lend money to citizens, with interest. More importantly, the Fed creates U.S. money, which it loans to the U.S. government, also while charging interest. The government must then collect income taxes to pay this interest. The sixteenth amendment, which gave Congress the power to collect income taxes, was passed the same year the Fed was created.
In 1934, Congressman Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania gave an astounding speech exposing who was behind the Fed. According to him, it was the same people who are behind important world events. Without naming them, McFadden described the elite bloodlines of the world.
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation’s debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed has cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over.
“This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.
“Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers; foreign and domestic speculators and swindlers; and rich and predatory money lender. In that dark crew of financial pirates there are those who would cut a man’s throat to get a dollar out of his pocket; there are those who send money into states to buy votes to control our legislatures; there are those who maintain International propaganda for the purpose of deceiving us into granting of new concessions which will permit them to cover up their past misdeeds and set again in motion their gigantic train of crime.
“These twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this Country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this Country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia, and thus drove a wedge between the allies in World War. They financed Trotsky’s passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian Revolution, and placed a large fund of American dollars at Trotsky’s disposal in one of their branch banks in Sweden so that through him Russian homes might be thoroughly broken up and Russian children flung far and wide from their natural protectors. They have since begun breaking up of American homes and the dispersal of American children. “Mr. Chairman, there should be no partisanship in matters concerning banking and currency affairs in this Country, and I do not speak with any.
“The Federal Reserve Bank destroyed our old and characteristic way of doing business. It discriminated against our 1-name commercial paper, the finest in the world, and it set up the antiquated 2-name paper, which is the present curse of this Country and which wrecked every country which has ever given it scope; it fastened down upon the Country the very tyranny from which the framers of the Constitution sough to save us.
In this speech of rare veracity, Congressman McFadden refers to “bankers who came here from Europe” and who use their immense wealth to influence world events who even pushed for a Russian revolution. His description of the “bankers” is perfectly applicable to an elite family like the Rothschilds, a dynasty of bankers from Europe who have been financing the war efforts of several countries for centuries.
That being said, was Kennedy actively working against the Fed or not? To this day, this question is still hotly debated. Some argue that JFK issued an executive order going against the Fed, others claim that he actually made the Fed stronger. There appears to be a great deal of contradictory information and disinformation floating around on the subject, a classic sign of being a “sensitive” issue.
In his 1990 book Crossfire, Jim Marrs states that, five months before his assassination, JFK signed Executive Order 11110, allowing the government to issue interest-free money by bypassing the entire Federal Reserve system.
Another overlooked aspect of Kennedy’s attempt to reform American society involves money. Kennedy apparently reasoned that by returning to the constitution, which states that only Congress shall coin and regulate money, the soaring national debt could be reduced by not paying interest to the bankers of the Federal Reserve System, who print paper money then loan it to the government at interest. He moved in this area on June 4, 1963, by signing Executive Order 11,110 which called for the issuance of $4,292,893,815 in United States Notes through the U.S. Treasury rather than the traditional Federal Reserve System. That same day, Kennedy signed a bill changing the backing of one and two dollar bills from silver to gold, adding strength to the weakened U.S. currency.
Kennedy’s comptroller of the currency, James J. Saxon, had been at odds with the powerful Federal Reserve Board for some time, encouraging broader investment and lending powers for banks that were not part of the Federal Reserve system. Saxon also had decided that non-Reserve banks could underwrite state and local general obligation bonds, again weakening the dominant Federal Reserve banks.
A number of “Kennedy bills” were indeed issued – the author has a five dollar bill in his possession with the heading “United States Note” – but were quickly withdrawn after Kennedy’s death. According to information from the Library of the Comptroller of the Currency, Executive Order 11,110 remains in effect today, although successive administrations beginning with that of President Lyndon Johnson apparently have simply ignored it and instead returned to the practice of paying interest on Federal Reserve notes. Today we continue to use Federal Reserve Notes, and the deficit is at an all-time high.”
- Jim Marrs, Crossfire

A comparison of a "United States Note" as issued by Kennedy (top) and a regular "Federal Reserve Note". Notice that the banner at the very top says "United States Note" instead of Federal Reserve Note". Also, the "B" logo of the Federal Reserve does not appear on the United States Note.
A comparison of a “United States Note” (top) as issued by the U.S. government and a regular “Federal Reserve Note” (bottom) as issued by the Fed. Although the bills are esthetically similar, the United States Note is debt-free, interest-free and bypasses the entire parasitical Federal Reserve System.
According to Marrs, the Excecutive Order was an effort by Kennedy to transfer power from the Federal Reserve to the United States Department of the Treasury by replacing Federal Reserve Notes with Silver Certificates. Here is the Executive Order :
SECTION 1. Executive Order No. 10289 of September 9, 1951, as amended, is hereby further amended (a) By adding at the end of paragraph 1 thereof the following subparagraph (j):
‘(j) The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the Act of May 12, 1933, as amended (31 U.S.C. 821(b)), to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver, or standard silver dollars in the Treasury not then held for redemption of an outstanding silver certificates, to prescribe the denominations of such silver certificates, and to coin standard silver dollars and subsidiary silver currency for their redemption,’ and (b) By revoking subparagraphs (b) and (c) of paragraph 2 thereof.
SECTION 2. The amendments made by this Order shall not affect any act done, or any right accruing or accrued or any suit or proceeding had or commenced in any civil or criminal cause prior to the date of this Order but all such liabilities shall continue and may be enforced as if said amendments had not been made.
John F. Kennedy,
THE WHITE HOUSE,
June 4, 1963.
However, Marrs’ theory was challenged by observers who state that Executive Order 11110 does not mention the creation of four billion dollars worth of “United States Notes” and is merely an amendment of a 1951 Executive Order pertaining delegating powers to the Secretary of the Treasury in issues pertaining to silver certificates.

Against the CIA and war?

Kennedy’s Presidency took place in a time period where the United States and the USSR were playing a game of chess on a worldwide scale. Through a variety of covert operations, the CIA fermented revolutions, funded armed groups, and assassinated leaders to gain control of several parts of the globe. During Kennedy’s presidency, the Cold War caused conflicts in areas including as Vietnam, Laos, and Cuba.
In 1961, Kennedy authorized the Bay of Pigs Invasion, the long-planned invasion of Cuba using a CIA-sponsored paramilitary group named “Brigade 2506″. The ultimate goal was the overthrow (or assassination) of Fidel Castro. The operation ended up failing, causing JFK to publicly take the blame for it. Kennedy was then quoted as telling an official within his administration: “I want to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds.” A few months later, CIA director Allen Dulles, Deputy Director for Plans Richard M. Bissell, Jr., and Deputy Director Charles Cabell were all forced to resign. After Kennedy’s death, Allen Dulles was part of the Warren Commission that investigated JFK’s assassination – a nomination that still raises eyebrows to this day.
In 1963 Kennedy learned about the assassination of the president of South Vietnam, Ngo Dinh Diem, which was first disguised as a suicide by the CIA. The bloody coup reportedly shook JFK to the core.
“According to General Maxwell Taylor, “Kennedy leaped to his feet and rushed from the room with a look of shock and dismay on his face which I had never seen before.” Kennedy had planned that Ngô Đình Diệm would be safely exiled and Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. recalled that the U.S. president was “somber and shaken”. Kennedy later penned a memo, lamenting that the assassination was “particularly abhorrent” and blaming himself for approving Cable 243, which had authorised Lodge to explore coup options in the wake of Nhu’s attacks on the Buddhist pagodas. Forrestal said that “It shook him personally … bothered him as a moral and religious matter. It shook his confidence, I think, in the kind of advice he was getting about South Vietnam.”
- Halberstam, David Singal, Daniel J, “The Making of a Quagmire: America and Vietnam during the Kennedy Era”
In the last days of his administration, JFK took several steps in reducing the number US soldiers in Vietnam and planned to ultimately achieve a complete withdrawal. Recordings of Defense Secretary McNamara and Vice-President Lyndon Johnson both have accounts of JFK wanting to pull out of Vietnam after his reelection in 1964 (they were both against it).
Kennedy reinforced his stance for peace on June 10, 1963, when he delivered an important speech at American University:
To discuss a topic on which too often ignorance abounds and the truth is too rarely perceived—yet it is the most important topic on earth: world peace … I speak of peace because of the new face of war…in an age when a singular nuclear weapon contains ten times the explosive force delivered by all the allied forces in the Second World War … an age when the deadly poisons produced by a nuclear exchange would be carried by wind and air and soil and seed to the far corners of the globe and to generations yet unborn … I speak of peace, therefore, as the necessary rational end of rational men … world peace, like community peace, does not require that each man love his neighbor—it requires only that they live together in mutual tolerance … our problems are man-made—therefore they can be solved by man. And man can be as big as he wants.
About a month before his assassination, JFK signed the National Security Action Memorandum (NSAM) 263 ordering the withdrawal of 1,000 military personnel from Vietnam by the end of the year. However, on November 26, 1963, only four days after Kennedy’s death, Lyndon Johnson passed NSAM 273 which reversed the withdrawal and reinforced U.S. commitment in Vietnam.

Against Big Oil?

Ever since the days of Rockefeller’s Standard Oil, big oil companies have enjoyed great privileges and influence in the United States. For example, since 1926, oil companies benefit from large tax concessions, including the oil depletion allowance, which allows them to keep 27.5 percent of their revenue tax-free.
In 1963, President Kennedy proposed removing the oil depletion allowance, the main tax incentive for oil companies. Estimates showed that it would have cost Texas oilmen $300 million in profits each year. He also passed the Kennedy Act, a piece of legislation that especially pinched oil companies, which would have caused them to give up 15 percent of their profits on foreign investments.
After Kennedy’s death, his successor Lyndon Johnson, who was extremely close with Texas oil companies, completely abandoned these plans.

In Conclusion

Although it is easy to either deify or vilify JFK, the truth is that he was merely a man who was a product of his environment – the occult elite. As a member of this rarefied group, he mixed with the dark side of Hollywood and got involved with the horrendous world of MK slaves and handlers.
However, on a professional level, Kennedy went against the best interests of the elite on several occasions by attempting to go against the CIA, the Federal Reserve, the military-industrial complex, and big oil companies. Indeed, Kennedy took bold steps towards limiting the powers of organizations who act in total secrecy and who give absolutely no accounts of their actions to the public. He went against the shadow government which works in the dark and, soon after, he was assassinated in broad daylight. Fifty years later, the official theory is that a lone gunman killed Kennedy. Is that plausible? In the decades that followed, the dreaded Kennedy curse continued, decimating the most prominent members of the family. Was the Kennedy dynasty shunned from the occult elite?
The last part of the series will look at JFK’s assassination, its occult meaning, and the fate of the rest of the Kennedy dynasty. Stay tuned.

The Malaysian Airlines MH17 Crash: Financial Warfare against Russia, Multibillion Dollar Bonanza for Wall Street


recession
While the mainstream media casually accuses Moscow without evidence of having orchestrated the shoot down of Malaysian Airlines MH17 in liaison with the Donesk rebels, the backlash of the crisis on international financial markets and on Russia’s financial system has passed virtually unnoticed.
Moreover, the political threats and insinuations directed against the Russian Federation in the wake of the July 17 disaster, have been coupled with a renewed wave of economic sanctions directed against major Russian corporations and financial institutions.
Inside Information and Foreknowledge
The conduct of speculative operations both prior and in the wake of the July 17 crash, is also a major consideration: In the functioning of World financial markets, terror events, natural disasters as well as major tragedies such as MH17 will invariably have an impact on the short term behavior of financial markets including major stock markets, the foreign exchange market as well the energy and commodities markets.
It should be noted that foreknowledge of a terror event such as the MH17 crash of July 17 over Eastern Ukraine’s warzone, offers an opportunity to the perpetrators as well as those who have advanced knowledge of the terror event to conduct profitable speculative transactions on various financial markets. Cui bono? Wall Street or Moscow’s Financial Establishment?
In other words, those who planned the attack on MH17 (including their political and economic sponsors) had in their possession valuable and confidential information which could be used in large scale speculative undertakings, including options trade on the DJIA, the Moscow Stock exchange (MICEX), foreign exchange markets, not to mention speculative trade (e.g. put options) on airline stocks.
What is described above is routine in the frequent conduct of “risk free” speculative trade by major financial institutions.
Major financial actors who had foreknowledge of the MH17 event of July 17 would have made billions of windfall gains in speculative transactions. With foreknowledge of the crash, institutional speculators would be in a position to accurately “predict” the short term decline of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and other major stock markets, commodity and forex indexes and act accordingly, placing speculative bets through the use of different financial instruments.
Moreover, there is also an overlap between Wall Street and the corporate financial media: Timely news releases by Bloomberg, the Wall Street Journal, the Financial Times, etc. in the wake of a major international event often exert a decisive influence on the actual movement of major financial indicators. At the same time, these powerful financial media –which influence investors’ perceptions regarding future market trends– overlap symbiotically with partner interests on Wall Street which are directly involved in undertaking major transactions. In fact, the corporate financial media are invariably major actors on Wall Street or the City of London. Who are the major shareholders of the WSJ, the Financial Times or the Economist? Is there a conflict of interest?
The New York Stock Exchange
In the wake of the July 17 crash of MH17, the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) declined from its 17150 peak and subsequently bounced back (see chart below). Foreknowledge of the MH17 would have allowed the reaping of financial gains on the short term movement of the Dow from one day to the next.
Table 1 Down Jones Industrial Average (DJIA)

The London Stock Market on July 17
While the NYSE was open on the 17th after the disaster over Ukraine, the London Market Stock opened up on Friday the 18th and experienced a short term slump in market values, rebounding at the end of trade on the 18th.
  London Stock Exchange FTSE  All Share Index

The Moscow Stock Exchange
The tragic event of July 17, coupled with immediate accusations directed against Russia, contributed to precipitating the tumble of the Moscow stock exchange (see chart below).
While European stock markets were also affected, the most dramatic decline was recorded on the Moscow Stock Exchange, with Moscow’s MICEX index falling by 2.3 per cent in one day and its dollar-traded related index, the RTS index, dropping by 3.8 per cent. (Reuters, July 18, 2014) (see chart below)
Those who had advanced knowledge of the MH17 crash and the likely accusations directed against Russia by president Obama would no doubt have placed their bets on a decline of both the MICEX and the Russian ruble.
Table 2 Moscow Stock Exchange MICEX Composite Index








Graphs: Source Financial Times, 2014
The Sanctions Regime
The economic sanctions regime initiated by the Obama administration had targeted the Russia’s arms industry, its major energy giants including state owned Gazprom and Rosneft as well as the privately owned gas conglomerate Novatek. Major Russian financial institutions were also the object of sanctions.
In a bitter irony, late Wednesday July 16th (ET), one day before the MH17 tragedy, the Obama administration announced a new set of sweeping sanctions directed against the Russian Federation:
[L]ate Wednesday [July 16, 2014] , President Barack Obama had announced fresh sanctions targeting Russia’s large-cap companies that included bellwether energy and banking companies.  …  “We have to see concrete actions, and not just words that Russia in fact is committed to trying to end this conflict along the Russia-Ukraine border,” Obama stated at the White House after announcing fresh sanctions on Russia’s large-caps. (MH17 Crash, Fresh US Sanctions: Beware of Funds with Russia Exposure, Zaks, July 18, 2014
It is worth noting that Rosneft has a gas deal with Exxon Mobil. The endgame of the sanctions regime is economic conquest, namely to weaken Russia’s energy giants with a view to ultimately modifying their ownership structure:
That the United States went for such a big company [i.e. sanctions] shows that it means business. Rosneft has outstanding debts of about $70 billion, close to its market capitalization, forcing it to seek persistent refinancing — and, leaving aside some Russian and Chinese financing, only the international dollar markets can provide sufficient financing.
Rosneft will have to reduce its capital expenditures because of the U.S. sanctions.” (Anders Aslund, U.S. responded to MH17 before airliner was shot down, Sanctions imposed after Russia delivered arms that brought down plane, Market Watch, July 18, 2014)
Following Obama’s timely announcement on the 16th of July, confirming a new wave of sanctions, the decline of stock values on Moscow’s Stock Exchange started at the opening of trade on July 17th prior to the crash of MH17.
Currency Markets: Decline of the Ruble
Currency markets were also affected. While the event did not precipitate a significant decline of the Malaysian ringgit, the Russian ruble fell by 1.8 per cent against the US dollar, its biggest one-day decline since June 2013. (Reuters, July 18, 2014). In the wake of the July 17 crash in Ukraine, the Russian ruble has continued to decline (see chart below).
Ongoing threats pertaining to Russia’s alleged role in the downing of MH17 not to mention the implementation of new sanctions against Russia announced on the 16 of July, have resulted in a significant decline of the Russian ruble. It should be understood the Russian central bank to prevent a further decline of the ruble, most probably used its forex reserves to counteract the speculative attack against the Russian ruble, leading to a significant capital outflow of  Russia’s dollar reserves.
Table 3  Russian Ruble (RUB) US Dollar Exchange Rate (June 21,  2014 – July 21, 2014) 
Decline in Airline Stocks

There was a significant decline in airline stock values quoted on NASDAQ on July 17th following the crash of MH17 (see chart below) characterized by a dip on the 17th and a recovery on the 18th. Those who had foreknowledge of the MH17 crash could have placed safe speculative bets reaping substantial profits.
As outlined at our introduction the issue of foreknowledge is of crucial significance. By definition the criminal perpetrators of the MH17 crash had foreknowledge which could have been used by partner financial  entities involved in speculative trade. This particular dimension of MH17 foreknowledge –reminiscent of the short selling of airline stock in the days preceding 9/11–requires further analysis and investigation. It should be a component of the criminal investigation into the July 17 crash itself.
NYSE Airline Index (XAL), July 15-21, 2014

The Fate of Malaysian Airlines
With the mysterious disappearance of MH370 in March, the number of MH passengers had dropped by 60 per cent. Malaysian Airline System’s (MAS) financial situation had become increasingly fragile.
Following the MH17 crash, Malaysian Airlines System is up for complete privatization. “MAS is almost 70 per cent owned by the government investment vehicle Kazanah Nasional, which earlier this year expressed interest in offloading part of its holding.” (ABC New Australia, July 21, 2014)
The annual decline in MAS stock is of the order of 25.8 (see chart below)
Table 4 Malaysian Airlines MAS Stock Values (July 2013- July 2014)

Source: Bloomberg, 2014

Malaysian Airlines MH17: Another “False Flag Operation” by the US-NATO-Israel War Cabal?

In-depth Report:

MH17: videos show missile launcher in vicinity of neighbouring towns
One would have thought that the Zionist Anglo-American war cabal would learn from their failures in propaganda warfare, especially now when their credibility is at rock bottom.
Post 9-11 and the Iraq wars, people the world over have got wiser to the devious propaganda ploys orchestrated by the global mass media.
Pointing an accusing finger within an hour of a false flag operation no longer carries any weight even if it is repeated hour on the hour by CNN, FOX, BBC etc. without an iota of evidence.
Obama and Hillary Clinton, war criminals and mass murderers, for all the bravado and rhetoric, sound hollow and come across as devious and opportunistic.
In trying to lay blame at Russia and the Donesk opposition forces that are fighting against the Kiev coup leaders installed by the Neocons, the propaganda stooges of the mainstream media have tripped themselves by making the most elementary mistakes.
The Daily Mail (UK) carried a report by Australian journalist, Demjin Doroschenko that there was looting at the site of the crash. He drew the conclusion purely on the fact that, he had found not one wallet that contained money while he was going through some of the passengers’ belongings to retrieve personal information on Australian victims.
In one brief statement, this pseudo journalist hopes to malign the resistance forces who have been battling the illegitimate Kiev regime installed by the Neocons and are now guarding the crash site.
In any country when a person unlawfully enters a crime scene, he would have been indicted. Doroschenko would like us to believe that he is not a looter but was merely retrieving personal information. He has also alleged that the site was not properly secured. But, he took upon himself to play the role of an investigator. He has no business to enter the site and to retrieve any information. He went specifically for the wallets. If his intent was genuine and sincere, he would look for passports. We also know that intelligence operators often posed as journalist.
Journalists have no right and or authority of any kind to enter a crime scene and examine evidence related to the crime.
Was any journalist allowed to enter ground zero immediately following the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9-11?
Was any journalist allowed to enter the Pentagon crash site and rummage through the wreckage to retrieve information on 9-11?
Then we have Michael Bociurkiw, an alleged observer from the OSCE who said, it basically looks like the biggest crime scene in the world right now, guarded by a bunch of guys in uniform with heavy firepower who are quite inhospitable.
Why is this propaganda stooge complaining that the site was being guarded by armed personnel? On the one hand, Doroschenko complains that the site was not guarded, but here we have an OSCE “observer” stating categorically that the site was guarded by heavily armed guards but, because he was not allowed into the crime scene, he vented his frustrations by making derogatory remarks about the guards. Putting tapes around a crime scene is S.O.P. and the purpose is to prevent any unlawful intrusion. And the crime scene is spread over a wide area – a few sq. kilometres. Security personnel are still combing the area for debris from the crash. It is therefore impossible to effectively secure the crash site entirely when it is spread over a few sq. kilometres!
He is but an “observer” and he should just observe but he has no authority whatsoever to enter the site as an investigator. Only duly qualified investigators are allowed.
Let us examine his words again, especially “looks like the biggest crime scene in the world right now.” What is the motive underlying such a statement?
Simple!
It is to divert attention from the war crimes committed by Zionist Israel in the biggest crime scene at the moment – GAZA where mass murder is taking place against innocent men, women and children.
The headlines of the Zionist-controlled mainstream media must now focus on MH 17 and away from Gaza so that Israel may continue their wanton massacres. But, this is not to say that the deliberate murder of the crew and passengers of MH 17 is not a heinous crime. It is! But, this false flag operation was committed to achieve bigger agendas, one of which is to divert attention from the heroic resistance by the Palestinians against Israel.
In my many articles on false flag operations, I have asserted categorically that it is the S.O.P. of Israel to piggy back on someone else’s false flag operations so as to deny any responsibility.
It is no coincidence that the shooting down of Malaysia’s MH 17 coincided with the ground invasion of Gaza.
Israel knows too well the intentions of the war party who have suffered setbacks after setbacks in trying to bait Russia to invade Ukraine thereby justifying a counter attack by the US and NATO forces. Sanctions to isolate Russia did not work and in fact have boomeranged! The latest round of sanctions proposed by US was not supported by the EU. This led to the unilateral sanctions by Obama.
A false flag operation was therefore needed to influence public opinion with a view to isolate and demonizing Russia, thereby setting the stage for a UN-declared sanctions regime against Russia coupled with further war provocations.
The global mass media was already primed to launch the propaganda campaign. Hillary Clinton was only too willing to beat the drums of war to strengthen her image as a “strong leader” committed to a war agenda to maintain the Zionist Anglo-American hegemony.
The day before the downing of MH 17, the Kiev regime deployed the Buk surface-to-air missiles to Eastern Ukraine for that said purpose. Such a deployment would make sense and deemed reasonable if the Opposition forces had aircrafts. They don’t even have tanks and or sophisticated military hardware. Their weapons were taken from Ukraine’s military bases.
The following facts cannot be denied or refuted by the Kiev regime:
Why did Ukrainian air traffic controllers allow the plane to deviate from the regular route to the north, towards “the anti-terrorist operation zone”?
Why was airspace over the warzone not closed for civilian flights, especially since the area was not entirely covered by radar navigation systems?
We need also to ask the Kiev regime, why target Malaysia’s MH 17?
Let me suggest an answer.
To follow the template of MH 370 investigations! To be precise, to have another country take control of the investigation as Australia has done in the case of MH 370 as the alleged crash site was “near” Australia. It would be impossible for Malaysia to be in control as the search for MH 370 had to be directed from Perth. Already, there are suggestions that a European country should head the investigation even though the plane is a Malaysian registered plane.
There will be another cover-up so that there will be no evidence linking the mass murder of the crew and passengers of MH 17 to their Western perpetrators.
Obama and the war party have made a fatal mistake. In assuming that they have total control of the global mass media, Obama and the war party immediately initiated a global propaganda war against Russia regardless of the evidence. It is unfortunate for the war party’s plans that the plane crashed into an area controlled by the Resistance forces which makes it that much more difficult to plant evidence as Doroschenko and others had attempted.
We have not forgotten that the US Navy shot down an Iranian civilian jet and mass murdered all the passengers. No apology was proffered by the US war criminals to Iran. They are now condoning the mass massacre of Palestinians in Gaza by Israel. Yet, these war criminals have the audacity to point a finger at Russia and the resistance forces against the illegitimate Kiev regime.
Russia is not Malaysia and has more resources at its disposal. It is a military power.
It is a matter of time when the truth about who fired the missile at MH 17 and from where will be established.
I am confident that when the truth is out, Obama, Hillary Clinton and the war party will be exposed as serial liars.
And not only would the US suffer a humiliating propaganda defeat, it would also have disastrous financial and economic consequences – the world would turn their backs on the US, the dollar and hasten the final phase of the global financial tsunami – the End Game.
I am disappointed with the Malaysian mass media which have uncritically reproduced the propaganda spun by the Zionist-controlled global mass media.
There was no attempt to present a balanced view as to the events leading to the downing of MH 17.
No views were sought from Russia. Why are Malaysian mass media quoting uncritically reports from US, UK and Australia but none from RT, and other Russian mass media? Why highlight Obama’s finger pointing when there was no evidence to support his allegations?
Why is the Kiev regime exempted from responsibility?
The airspace is under the control of the illegitimate Kiev regime. The emergency personnel at the site are from the Kiev regime and as such to allege uncritically that the Ukrainian Resistance was obstructing is without basis.
What is so wrong to put the bodies in refrigerated coaches to preserve the bodies for identification?
There are enough pictures showing even the observers from OSCE wearing face mask to shield them from the bodies.
Yet, when some bodies have not been removed to the refrigerated coaches (as not all bodies could be removed at once), the Western press levy criticisms that such bodies have been left to rot!
Yet, this standard operating procedure of preserving bodies under difficult circumstances have been ridiculed and criticised as an attempt to remove evidence. Where is the objectivity?
It is about time that we in Malaysia do not fall prey to Western propaganda.
On the issue of the black box – should it not be kept safe and secure rather than being left at the site pending the arrival of Malaysia’s delegation?
When Malaysia exercised the right of ownership to the MH 370 black box, if and when it is recovered, there were third countries challenging that right. Malaysia had to send a delegation to the UK to verify this inalienable right!
Malaysia should not let emotions get the better of sound judgment and not make hasty accusations.
Malaysia was severely criticised for MH 370. Russia and its leaders are being blamed for something for which they are not responsible.
Yet, having suffered such one-sided criticism for MH 370, one would have thought that we Malaysians should be more circumspect in pointing fingers at Russia and its leaders.
Stop this nonsense and wait for full investigations!
Shame on you Malaysian mass media! Why are you in cahoots with the Obama regime in spewing nonsense?
If the truth shows that the fascist Kiev regime was responsible for downing MH 17, is Malaysia willing to apologise to Russia for the false accusations?
Will our mass media pay compensation to the leaders of Russia for the defamatory articles they carried?
Malaysian mass media should not be the mouthpiece of Western propaganda!

…MEANWHILE, CONGRESS INTRODUCES A BILL RECOGNIZING PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS…ON ASTEROIDS

While all the geopolitical-financial shenanigans have been going on “down below” here on planet Earth, Congress has its eye on the future of finance and outer space, for a bill has been introduced in Congress recognizing private property rights on asteroids:
Asteroid Mining Bill Introduced In Congress To Protect Private Property Rights
There’s a hugely significant statement with hugely significant implications in this short article:
“The crucial part of the short piece of legislation states that the resources mined from an asteroid would be the property of the entity undertaking the operation. This language gets around the provision of the Outer Space Treaty that says states are forbidden to establish national sovereignty over celestial bodies, which would be a prerequisite to the United States allowing a private entity to own an asteroid. It rather grants mineral rights to the asteroid, something the treaty does not mention. There is no enforcement mechanism in the event of a dispute with another country, however.”
For those who’ve been following my analysis, I’ve been arguing that (1) a secret system of finance was put into place after World War Two, utilizing Axis loot (and hence the cooperation of the post-war Axis elite), (2) this was directly managed by the intelligence-finance-military-industrial complex, or, to put it more bluntly, the intelligence community was put directly into the international finance business, and (3) this whole scheme was done for the purpose of a long-term secret research project designed to develop exotic space capabilities and emulate UFO performance.
Such a scheme, as I’ve been arguing, implied as a necessary component of such a secret financial architecture the following things: (1) the participation of some prime banks or at least key individuals within them in key management and accounting/investment positions, and (2) the ability to manipulate markets (eventually through penetrated technological means, high frequency trading being perhaps one manifestation of this requirement). As a result of these requirements, and particularly of the first, some “gain” had to be present for said financial institutions to participate, and this, I have argued, was the secretive “collateralization” of whatever might be found in space, either in terms of any resources or in terms of any recovered artifacts or technologies discovered. This, for those who have followed my analysis of the bearer bonds scandals, and in particular the first one, the “Japanese Bearer bond scandal”, was in my opinion the meaning of the scandals, and the message in particular of the first one, with its evidently hoaxed “Kennedy Billion Dollar bearer bond” with its suggestive allusion to space activities on the reverse side of the “bond.”
Within this context, it appears that Congress might be posed to make it “official,” and that carries with it some huge implications, for by “recognizing” mineral rights of private companies purchasing such things on, say, an asteroid or other planet such as the Moon or Mars, then this ipso facto extends – in a very imperial fashion – the standards of American jurisprudence and law to outer space. And as the article also avers, it creates the potentiality for conflicts over those resources. The model that we are watching emerge is the creation of all the fundamentals to create space-based versions of the “East Indies companies” that so dramatically drove European expansion and imperialism from the 1600s to the early 1900s. One may think in terms of the “American Asteroid Indies Company” or the “Franco-German Planetary Mining Consortium” and so on.
In short, what this bill is also really about is the eventual weaponization of space(which I personally believe has already been long underway).
It remains to be seen how the rest of the space-faring powers will deal with it, but if recent announcements are any indicator, they already know the nature of the imperial game that is now emerging in space.

Malaysian Airlines MH17: Weathering the Propaganda Firestorm


mentalimaging
The level of unsubstantiated propaganda being directed against Russia regarding the downing of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 has reached unprecedented lows. 
There is tangible desperation across Western media establishments, their political spheres, and within their corporate-financier funded policy think-tanks as they attempt to reassert their agenda and narrative not only upon the crisis in Ukraine, but upon the entire world as their weakening grip becomes apparent to all.
 
The dangerous desperation emanating from the West follows the latest in a series of growing failures – the previous and most comparable being the loss of its proxy war against Syria and the desperate criminal conspiracy they unleashed in a failed attempt to save it. 
Syria and the 2013 Damascus Sarin Gas Attack 
In mid-2013 Syrian government forces had already begun an irreversible push to restore security across the country. While the West attempted to maintain the facade that terrorists operating within Syrian territory were still a viable threat to Damascus, reports even from the Western media itself indicated otherwise. The Independent’s April 2013 article, “They may be fighting for Syria, not Assad. They may also be winning: Robert Fisk reports from inside Syria,” even went as far as quoting Syrian forces as saying:
“Why should we use chemical weapons when our Mig aircraft and their bombs cause infinitely more destruction?”
It came as a surprise then, to analysts who were closely following the conflict to see in August 2013, a sarin gas attack in Damascus, on the same day UN inspectors arrived in the capital for the very purpose of investigating claims of previous chemical weapons use. Why would Damascus risk using chemical weapons when it was already winning the war soundly with more effective conventional weapons, especially under the nose of UN chemical weapon inspectors?
Answering the question of “cui bono?” was simple – NATO, its regional partners, and their proxy terrorists – who would benefit immensely if they could convince the world that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had “gassed his own people.” The Western propaganda machine was thrown into decisive motion.
The UN immediately set out to investigate the attacks but were unable to draw any conclusions as to who the perpetrators were. Citing “evidence” Western intelligence agencies had “collected,” but would not divulge, the West attempted to convict the Syrian government entirely in the court of public opinion.
Image: It was later confirmed that NATO-member Turkey was helping supply Al Qaeda terrorists with sarin nerve agent, as well as training in how to use it.

Headlines read:
Obama: Syria changed when Assad gassed citizens,
Assad gassed Syria 15 times since 2012 – US weighing strike options,” and
The US and its partners failed categorically to produce any evidence linking the attacks to Damascus, and despite claims that the UN’s investigation “pointed to Assad,” the UN itself never determined the party responsible.
It wasn’t until a bombshell report by Pulitzer Prize-winning veteran journalist Seymour Hersh titled, “Whose Sarin?” that the truth behind the West’s lies were revealed – that NATO-member Turkey and close US ally Saudi Arabia gave Al Qaeda-Al Nusra terrorists training and equipment to carry out sarin attacks – and most likely carried out the August 2013 attack in an attempt to justify foreign intervention and save an otherwise lost battle against the Syrian government.
Russia and the 2014 MH17 Airliner Disaster
Russia for months has continuously confounded NATO’s attempts to overthrow and reorder the nation of Ukraine along its western border. While NATO managed to violently remove the elected government of Viktor Yanukovych, the proxies it chose to replace it with were immediately as incompetent as they were unpopular. In quick succession, Crimea peeled away from Kiev and became a federal district of Russia, while the provinces of Donetsk and Lugansk declared independence and sought closer ties with neighboring Russia.
Disorganized, underfunded, and ill-equipped, the Ukrainian army fought a brutal punitive campaign in eastern Ukraine that as of July began unraveling in spectacular disarray. Entire units were wiped out, others encircled, and others still on the brink of mutiny. Attempts to undermine Russia throughout Kiev’s rampage east failed as well. A second round of sanctions leveled at Russia by the United States and Europe were recognized globally as ineffective and impotent. NATO’s last card appeared to be out on the table, and it was a ‘joker.’
With Russia and the separatists in eastern Ukraine standing at the threshold of inevitable victory and standing high in global public opinion, Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was downed near the Ukrainian-Russian border in territory controlled by eastern Ukrainian separatists. Again, answering the question of “cui bono?” is simple. NATO – and the West made no secret of this.
Headlines followed in the same politically motivated, factually disfigured manner as they did in regards to Syria:
Jet downing a ‘game-changer’ in world relations with Russia,”
With Jet’s Fall, War in Ukraine Becomes Global,”
The “game changer” indeed – just like NATO’s false flag sarin gas attack in Damascus was supposed to be at a time Syria’s government would benefit the least from it, and when NATO would have benefited the most. Again, absolutely no evidence is being provided for public scrutiny – the public is simply being told that it “exists,” just as it “did” in Syria’s case. The hysterical accusations being made by Western politicians and the media echoing them in editorial after editorial is behavior unbecoming of a global order that passes itself off as guided by the “rule of law,” “democracy,” “justice,” or just plain human decency.
The “Evidence”
For now, all that is certain is that there’s a plane wreck in eastern Ukraine. That is all the evidence that exists. Clearly fabricated propaganda emanating from Kiev hints to criminal conspiracy aimed at framing Russia, but the particulars of how MH17 crashed and who may be responsible have yet to come to light.
Image: The only evidence – a field with MH17′s wreckage.

At best, commentators and analysts must search for what is most probable while calling for and awaiting the results of an independent investigation. Until then, no conclusions can be made, and certainly no measures taken based on such premature, baseless conclusions.
Next, the psychological and political inertia the West is attempting to build against Russia must be blunted. The irresponsible preying on emotions and skewing of reality by the West and its propaganda endangers the search for truth – constituting an international obstruction of justice.
Weathering the Propaganda Firestorm 
We should not expect the West to search for credible evidence or provide it. Whatever independent investigation does take place, will be manipulated and spun by the Western media, drawing conclusions that were never made by investigators, just as was done in Damascus in August of 2013. Already, the West is claiming the crash site is being “tampered with” – a convenient excuse to dismiss unfavorable developments that implicate either NATO or Kiev, or both.
As with the Damascus sarin gas attack in 2013, those seeking the truth must weather the propaganda firestorm, poking holes in the lies relentlessly until time has run out for those seeking to exploit this catastrophe. The West must not be allowed to reassert itself in Ukraine, a nation it destabilized with its engineered “Euromaidan” mobs and the subsequent, illegitimate regime that resulted in the first place.
Readers must finally ask themselves what sort of “world leader” would celebrate the downing of a commercial airliner as a “game changer” and immediately mobilize, not to seek the truth, but exploit fully baseless accusations and intentional distortions to score political points in the immediate aftermath? A “world leader” we can afford allowing to continue leading?