Saturday, December 8, 2012

IBM Reveals the Biggest Artificial Brain of All Time

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/extreme-machines/4337190       


IBM Reveals the Biggest Artificial Brain of All Time

IBM has revealed the biggest artificial brain of all time, a simulation run by a 147,456-processor supercomputer that requires millions of watts of electricity and over 150,000 gigabytes of memory. The brain simulation is a feat for neuroscience and computer processing—but it's still one-eighty-third the speed of a human brain and is only as large as a cat's. Will we ever get to truly capable artificial intelligence? PM reports from IBM's Almaden research center to find out.

By Douglas Fox
San Jose, Calif.--Scientists at IBM's Almaden research center have built the biggest artificial brain ever--a cell-by-cell simulation of the human visual cortex: 1.6 billion virtual neurons connected by 9 trillion synapses. This computer simulation, as large as a cat's brain, blows away the previous record--a simulated rat's brain with 55 million neurons--built by the same team two years ago.

"This is a Hubble Telescope of the mind, a linear accelerator of the brain," says Dharmendra Modha, the Almaden computer scientist who will announce the feat at the Supercomputing 2009 conference in Portland, Ore. In other words, in the realm of computer science, the team's undertaking is grand.

The cortex, the wrinkly outer layer of the brain, performs most of the higher functions that make humans human, from recognizing faces and speech to choreographing the dozens of muscle contractions involved in a perfect tennis serve. It does this using a universal neural circuit called a microcolumn, repeated over and over. Modha hopes the simulation, assembled using neuroscience data from rats, cats, monkeys and humans, will help scientists better understand how the brain works--and, in particular, how the cortical microcolumn manages to perform such a wide range of tasks.

But deciphering the microcolumn can also help build better computers, Mars rovers and robots that are truly intelligent. By reverse engineering this cortical structure, Modha says, researchers could give machines the ability to interpret biological senses such as sight, hearing and touch. And artificial machine brains could process, intelligently, senses that don't currently exist in the natural world, such as radar and laser range-finding.

"Imagine peppering the entire surface of the ocean with pressure, temperature, humidity, wave height and turbidity sensors," Modha says. "Imagine streaming this data to a reverse-engineered cortex." In short, he envisions wiring the entire planet--transforming it into a virtual organism with the capacity to understand its own evolving patterns of weather, climate and ocean currents.

The simulation that Modha will unveil today is just a starting point. It lacks the neural patterning that develops as real brains mature. Neuroscientists believe that this complexity can only evolve through "embodied learning"--stumbling around in a physical body, in which every action has instant consequences that are experienced through senses such as touch and sight. As Anil Seth, a neuroscientist at the University of Sussex in Britain, puts it, "The brain wires itself."

Seth demonstrated this principle while at the Neurosciences Institute in San Diego using a brain simulation called Darwin. He embodied Darwin's 50,000 virtual neurons (about equal to the brain of a pond snail, or one-quarter of a fruit fly) in a wheeled robot. As Darwin wandered around, its virtual neurons rewired their connections to produce so-called hippocampal "place cells"--similar to neurons found in mammals--which helped it navigate. Scientists don't know how to program these place cells, but with embodied learning the cells emerge on their own.

Paul Maglio, a cognitive scientist at Almaden, has similar plans for Modha's cortical simulation. He's building a virtual world for it to inhabit using software from the video shootout game "Unreal Tournament" and data from Mars. Besides topographic maps and aerial photos, Maglio plans to use rover-level imagery to create terrain with lifelike boulders and craters.

The video-game software provides a pallet of several dozen robotic bodies for Modha's virtual cortex. Initially, it will use a simple wheeled robot to explore its world, driven by fundamental desires such as sustenance and survival. "It's got to like some things and not like other things," Maglio says. "Ultimately, it's going to want not to roll off the edges of cliffs."

Modha's billion-neuron virtual cortex is so massive that running it required one of the fastest supercomputers in the world--Dawn, a Blue Gene/P supercomputer at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) in California.

Dawn hums and breathes inside an acre-size room on the second floor of the lab's Terascale Simulation Facility. Its 147,456 processors and 147,000 gigabytes of memory fill 10 rows of computer racks, woven together by miles of cable. Dawn devours a million watts of electricity through power cords as thick as a bouncer's wrists--racking up an annual power bill of $1 million. The roar of refrigeration fans fills the air: 6675 tons of air-conditioning hardware labor to dissipate Dawn's body heat, blowing 2.7 million cubic feet of chilled air through the room every minute.

Dawn was installed earlier this year by the Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), which conducts massive computer simulations to ensure the readiness of the nation's nuclear weapons arsenal. Modha's team worked with Dawn for a week before it was transitioned to NNSA's classified nuclear work. For all of its legendary computing power, Dawn still ran Modha's 1.6 billion neurons at only one-six-hundredth the speed of a living brain. A second simulation, with 1 billion neurons, ran a little faster--but still only at one-eighty-third of normal brain speed.

These massive simulations are merely steps toward Modha's ultimate goal: simulating the entire human cortex, about 25 billion neurons, at full speed. To do that, he'll need to find 1000 times more computing power. At the rate that supercomputers have expanded over the last 20 years, that super-super computer could exist by 2019. "This is not just possible, it's inevitable," Modha says. "This will happen."

But it won't be easy. "Business as usual won't get us there," says Mike McCoy, head of advanced simulation and computing at LLNL. Development of supercomputers in recent decades has ridden the wave of Moore's law: transistors shrank and the computing power of processor chips doubled every 18 months. But that wild ride is coming to an end. Transistors are now packed so densely on chips that the heat they generate can no longer be dissipated. To reduce heat, Dawn uses older, larger, 180-nanometer transistors that were developed 10 years ago--rather than the 45-nanometer transistors that are used in desktop computers today. And for the same reason, Dawn runs these transistors at a sluggish 850 megahertz--three times slower than today's desktop computers.

The supercomputer that Modha needs to simulate a whole cortex would also consume prohibitive amounts of power. "If you scale up current technology, this system might require between 100 megawatts and a gigawatt of power," says Horst Simon, a mathematician at nearby Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, who collaborated with Modha on the simulation. One gigawatt (a billion watts) is the amount of power that the mad scientist Emmett "Doc" Brown needed to operate his DeLorean time machine in the 1985 movie "Back to the Future." But Simon puts it more bluntly: "It would be a nuclear power plant," he says. The electricity alone would cost $1 billion per year.

The human brain, by comparison, survives on just 20 watts. Although supercomputer simulations are power-hungry, Modha hopes that the insights they provide will eventually pave the way to more elegant technology. With funding from DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), he's working with a far-flung team at five universities and four IBM labs to create a new computer chip that can mimic the cortex using far less power than a computer. "I'll have it ready for you within the next decade," he says.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/engineering/extreme-machines/4337190

MPAA Lobbying for Home Theater Regulations

http://www.bbspot.com/News/2006/11/home-theater-regulations.html       
Monday, November 27 12:00 AM ET

MPAA Lobbying for Home Theater Regulations

By Scott Small
Los Angeles , CA - The MPAA is lobbying congress to push through a new bill that would make unauthorized home theaters illegal. The group feels that all theaters should be sanctioned, whether they be commercial settings or at home.
MPAA head Dan Glickman says this needs to be regulated before things start getting too far out of control, "We didn't act early enough with the online sharing of our copyrighted content. This time we're not making the same mistake. We have a right to know what's showing in a theater."
The bill would require that any hardware manufactured in the future contain technology that tells the MPAA directly of what is being shown and specific details on the audience. The data would be gathered using various motion sensors and biometric technology.
The MPAA defines a home theater as any home with a television larger than 29" with stereo sound and at least two comfortable chairs, couch, or futon. Anyone with a home theater would need to pay a $50 registration fee with the MPAA or face fines up to $500,000 per movie shown.
Related News
MPAA to Thwart Pirates by Making All Movies Suck
Sony Unveils New Self-Destructive DVD Player
MPAA and DVD Manufacturers Agree on HD-DVD Format
"Just because you buy a DVD to watch at home doesn't give you the right to invite friends over to watch it too. That's a violation of copyright and denies us the revenue that would be generated from DVD sales to your friends," said Glickman. "Ideally we expect each viewer to have their own copy of the DVD, but we realize that isn't always feasible. The registration fee is a fair compromise.
The bill also stipulates that any existing home theaters be retrofitted with the technology or else the owner is responsible for directly informing the MPAA and receiving approval before each viewing.

PDF: The CIA and the Banks

'Something may come through' dimensional 'doors' at LHC

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/11/06/lhc_dimensional_portals/print.html           

'Something may come through' dimensional 'doors' at LHC

Attack of the Hyperdimensional Juggernaut-Men
A top boffin at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) says that the titanic machine may possibly create or discover previously unimagined scientific phenomena, or "unknown unknowns" - for instance "an extra dimension".
"Out of this door might come something, or we might send something through it," said Sergio Bertolucci, who is Director for Research and Scientific Computing at CERN, briefing reporters including the Reg at CERN HQ earlier this week.
The LHC, built inside a 27-km circular subterranean tunnel deep beneath the Franco-Swiss border outside Geneva, functions like a sort of orbital motorway for extremely high-speed hadrons - typically either protons or lead ions.
The differences are, firstly, that the streams of particles are moving at velocities within a whisker of light speed - such that each stream has as much energy in it as a normal car going at 1000mph [1]. Secondly, the beams are arranged in such fashion that the two streams swerve through one another occasionally, which naturally results in huge numbers of incredibly violent head-on collisions.
These collisions are sufficiently violent that they are expected to briefly create conditions similar to those obtaining countless aeons ago, not long after the Big Bang, when the entire universe was still inconceivably small - it was smaller than a proton for quite some time, seemingly, still with all the stuff that nowadays makes up all the supra-enormity of space and galaxies and so forth packed in somehow.
Naturally, some extremely strange phenomena are to be expected when one mangles the very fabric of space-time itself in this fashion. Various eccentric nutballs have claimed [2] that this would doom humanity in one fashion or another; perhaps converting the entire Earth, everything on it and possibly the rest of the universe too into "strangelet soup", monopole mulligatawny or some other sort of frightful sub-particulate blancmange or custard.
It has also been suggested that cack-handed boffins at the LHC might inadvertently call into being a miniature black hole and carelessly drop this into the centre of the Earth, rather irritatingly causing the planet to implode. It's certainly to be hoped that the button marked "Call Black Hole Into Being" on the control board has some kind of flip-down cover over it.
Obviously all that's utter rubbish. But some boffins have speculated that black holes might alternatively act as spacewarp wormhole portals into alternate universes, or something. This would seem to chime with Bertolucci's remarks this week on hyperdimensional "doors" out of which might come unspecified "somethings".

So what have we got? Dinosaurs? Demonic soul-reapers? Parallel globo-Nazis? Hyperspherical juggernaut-beings? Come on

Anyone who has watched a TV, read any sci-fi or seen any movies will be well aware that hyperdimensional spacewarp wormhole portals don't normally lead to anything boring like empty space, parallel civilisations where humanity lives in peace and harmony or anything like that.
Rather, it seems a racing cert that we're looking here at an imminent visit from a race of carnivorous dinosaur-men, the superhuman clone hive-legions of some evil genetic queen-empress, infinite polypantheons of dark nega-deities imprisoned for aeons and hungering to feast upon human souls, a parallel-history victorious Nazi globo-Reich or something of that type.
We took the matter up with Dr Mike Lamont, a control-room boffin at the LHC.
"We're hoping to see supersymmetry and extra dimensions," he confirmed.
Pressed on the matter of doors through which something might come, as hinted at by Bertolucci, Lamont rather elliptically said "well, he's a theorist", before recommending the book Warped Passages [3] by physicist Lisa Randall. This explores ways in which extra-dimensional space and entities might interact with our own. It uses among others the example of how a sphere moving in 3D space would appear to someone living on a single 2D plane-space - that is as a mysterious circle suddenly blossoming into existence, growing, perhaps moving about and then shrinking down and vanishing again.
"There's no maths in it," added Lamont encouragingly, having assessed the intellectual level of the Reg news team with disconcerting percipience.
Summarising, then, it appears that we might be in for some kind of invasion by spontaneously swelling and shrinking spherical or wheel-shaped creatures - something on the order of the huge rumbling stone ball from Indiana Jones - able to move in and out of our plane at will. Soon the cities of humanity will lie in smoking ruins, shattered by the Attack of the Teleporting Juggernaut-tyrants from the Nth Dimension.
Dr Bertolucci later got in touch to confirm that yes indeed, there would be an "open door", but that even with the power of the LHC at his disposal he would only be able to hold it open "a very tiny lapse of time, 10-26 seconds, [but] during that infinitesimal amount of time we would be able to peer into this open door, either by getting something out of it or sending something into it.
"Of course," adds Bertolucci, "after this tiny moment the door would again shut, bringing us back to our 'normal' four dimensional world ... It would be a major leap in our vision of Nature, although of no practcal use (for the time being, at least). And of course [there would be] no risk to the stability of our world."
We say: Excellent. Who said the LHC was a waste of money? ®

When Worlds Collide: The Cern Stargate

http://www.redicecreations.com/article.php?id=3620                 When Worlds Collide: The Cern Stargate 2008 05 03
By: Neil Kramer | thecleaver.blogspot.com
If you really want to conceal something - hide it in plain sight. This technique is a hallmark of Illuminist groups who are compelled to constantly and robustly protect their hidden knowledge. For over a century, film has been a primary means of deploying the 'hide in plain sight' deception on a mass scale. From the early sci-fi and horror films of European silent cinema to the multi-million dollar Hollywood blockbusters, film has reliably served as a mainline into the belief systems of the populace. A complex alchemy of synchronicity, cultural programming and mind control is used to concurrently deliver both a wash of sensual distraction and a download of unreality tutoring. The data from the screen prescribes social tolerances, establishes acceptable behavioural parameters and encodes pre-determined archetypes into the consciousness of the viewer.


For most people, informed solely by the aforementioned fictional matrix curriculum, the word Stargate conjures images of the cliché ridden 1994 film of the same name, starring Kurt Russell. Or perhaps the Stargate SG-1 spinoff series, the longest-running US science fiction series of all time (of which I have seen none). The whole stargate imagery, language and feel is already there, pre-packaged and ready to go. We sort of know what a stargate is and what it looks like. They move people from one point in space and time to another. Wormholes. Star travel. Stuff like that. As to their actual existence however, as real world devices, their authenticity has remained entirely unbroadcast.

Not for much longer. A stargate based in the heart of Europe is coming online in May 2008.

Fellowship Of The Ring

CERN is the Earth’s largest particle physics lab, situated in northwest Geneva on the border of France and Switzerland. Essentially it is a huge particle accelerator complex, using electric fields to propel particles to super high speeds and contain them. CERN operates a cluster of 6 particle accelerators, 1 decelerator and multiple particle detectors.

CERN is a European super-project with 20 core European signatory countries (including UK, France, Germany, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Sweden, The Netherlands) and a group of international countries (America, Israel, Japan, Russia, India etc) participating with so called ‘observer’ status. Over 7900 scientists and engineers (about half the global particle physics community) work on experiments conducted at CERN.

Most recent activities have been directed towards the new Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The LHC is located in a circular tunnel 100 metres underground, between Geneva Airport and the nearby Jura mountains. A 17 mile circumference ring houses two pipes enclosed within superconducting magnets cooled by liquid helium. Each pipe contains a separate proton beam, each travelling in opposite directions around the ring. Additional magnets are used to direct the beams to four intersection points where interactions between them will take place. In total, over 1600 superconducting magnets are installed, with most weighing over 27 tonnes. It is a 21st century ouroboros; the mystical symbol of infinity, the alchemical symbol of purification.


The officially stated function of CERN is to provide infrastructure for high-energy physics research. One goal of the LHC is to establish the existence of the "Higgs Boson" particle. It is thought that the Higgs Boson is what gives matter "mass". To observe it, the LHC will be colliding Hadrons (specifically Protons) together at unimaginably high speeds. Six principle experiments at the LHC (named ALICE, ATLAS, TOTEM, CMS, LHCb, and LHCf) aim to explore fundamental elements of existence areas such as gravity, mass, matter, antimatter, the origins of the universe and extra dimensions of spacetime. We don’t typically hear much about that in the news.

I am still waiting for the evening news to mention that “The CERN Stargate, designed to send matter from this universe into another dimension, comes online next week.” As sci-fi as that sounds, that is precisely what CERN will do and everyone should be aware of it.

To quote CERN’s own published documentation: "Some theories suggest that, beyond the three spatial dimensions we experience, our Universe has some extra dimensions. These have finite size, so they are curved onto themselves, for instance in the shape of a circle (although, for more than one extra dimension, more complicated geometries are possible)."

“To really detect the extra dimension one needs to probe it with particles with a very high energy. In quantum mechanics, the larger the energy of the particle, the smaller its effective size is. So to detect a small dimension, one needs particles of very high energy. The extra dimensions are actually so small that even our largest particle accelerators have not produced particles of enough energy to see them. However, in some theories, the sizes of the extra dimensions are ... just large enough for particles in the LHC at CERN to be able to detect them.”

“There are theories that suggest that the matter particles we are made of cannot propagate on the extra dimensions. In these theories, the only way to detect the extra dimensions is by using gravitational interactions. The strength of gravity in the 5-dimensional (or higher-dimensional) description is much more intense than in four dimensions, hence we predict the possibility of creating black holes in collisions in the LHC. These events would be spectacular, with the black hole decaying almost immediately into a shower of many particles, and would allow us to test the properties of quantum gravity in accelerators. In any of these two possible scenarios, the detection of the existence of extra dimensions would be an unprecedented discovery, and an astonishing insight into the nature of the Universe!”

In my cosmology, it would not be unprecedented. It would be a rediscovery of ancient knowledge that has been on Earth many times before.

Secrets In The Fields

At the 2007 Glastonbury Symposium, I attended lectures by leading lights in the crop circle phenomenon Dr. Horace Drew and Bert Janssen (amongst others) who explained in detail how the advanced physics and geometry embedded in many crop formations was known only to a handful of people at the time of their creation. In some cases, what the circles were depicting was astonishing cutting-edge quantum physics. Their apparent 2D format actually describing 3D and often 4D constructs in their advanced use of three, seven and nine-fold geometry.

I visited multiple crop circles, each of them representing complex mathematical constructs and geometries. The level of detail and precision I encountered was mind blowing. Fellow researchers, from first timers to old time ‘croppies’, were equally in awe of their enigmatic beauty. One quickly concludes that the genuine circles are not the work of human hands. It also becomes clear that the value of the circles is, for me at least, not in who makes them, or even how, but rather in what they are telling us.

The sophisticated geometry in the circles resonates with multi-dimensional physics, string theory and m-theory. Recall, the CERN spokesman suggested that “more complicated geometries” are required to describe multi-dimensional reality. It is feasible that this is exactly what the circles are doing. They are teachings in how the universe is constructed. As Janssen states, “Crop circles are far less straightforward than you would think at first sight. They cannot be done away with as just a simple joke. Their geometry shows that there is far more to it. The different aspects of geometry even suggest that it is impossible for humans to reproduce [the shown] crop circles in an actual field.” For examples, see his excellent site http://www.bertjanssen.nl/cropcircles.html

The Uncertainty Of A Dead Cat

Werner Heisenberg proposed that by measuring the position of a particle, we unavoidably alter its predictable momentum. Thus it is impossible to know both the exact position and the exact velocity of an object at the same time. Furthermore, the uncertainty of the particle’s movement is a manifestation of the observer observing it; the consciousness of the observer changes the observed object. Hot stuff, especially in the 1920’s.

According to American physicist and leading string field theorist, Professor Michio Kaku, the best Nobel Laureates cannot agree on the outcome of the Schrödinger’s cat thought experiment. They just don’t get it. Kaku suggests that it remains the single most important quandary in the history of modern man.

The Schrödinger’s cat paradox poses a philosophical question about the nature of reality, particularly pertinent to those interested in Quantum Physics. It goes like this. A cat is put inside a sealed box with a device that may or may not release a poison gas, dependent on a totally random 50/50 chance. After one hour, the device will have either released the deadly gas or not. According to quantum theory, after an hour, the cat is actually in a quantum superposition of being both alive and dead at the same time, until someone opens the box that is. When the observer opens the box, the cat then manifests as being either alive or dead.

There are two main possibilities to explain the quantum paradox.

The Copenhagen interpretation. A system stops being a superposition of states and becomes either one or the other when an observation takes place; i.e. when consciousness intervenes. When the observer looks, the superposition state collapses into a single state.

Hugh Everett's many-worlds interpretation (MWI). Both alive and dead states of the cat occur, but are separate (or decoherent) from each other. When the box is opened, that part of the universe containing the observer and cat is split into two separate universes, one containing an observer looking at a box with a dead cat, one containing an observer looking at a box with a live cat. This infers multiple, perhaps infinite, parallel universes.

CERN and the LHC will shed light on MWI. MWI denies the objective reality of wavefunction collapse. The subjective appearance of wavefunction collapse is actually quantum decoherence. MWI resolves all the paradoxes of quantum theory since every possible outcome to every event defines or exists in its own "history" or "world". In layman's terms, this means that there are an infinite number of universes and that everything that could possibly happen in our universe (but doesn't) happens somewhere else, in another universe. Hence the growing recognition of the term multiverse.

A Super Massive Hot Lump Of Strange Matter

Some are more nervous than others about the experiments conducted at the Large Hadron Collider. The concerned voices focus on the possibility that the LHC could create mini black holes that may last long enough to get out of control and start eating things up. The formation of black hole analogs on Earth (in particle accelerators) has been reported. They act like black holes because of the correspondence between the theory of the strong nuclear force and the quantum theory of gravity. It is presently unknown whether the much more energetic LHC would be capable of producing the speculative large extra dimension micro black hole, as many theorists have suggested. In theory, Hawking Radiation means that any arising black holes will evaporate in Femtoseconds (not long at all), not enough to accrete mass or cause problems. Though this comforting thought has never been proven.

If that wasn’t enough, there’s also the theoretical possibility that quarks could recombine into “strangelets". According to the strange matter hypothesis, when a strangelet comes into contact with a lump of ordinary matter such as Earth, it could convert the ordinary matter to strange matter. This "ice-nine" disaster scenario is as follows: one strangelet hits a nucleus, catalyzing its immediate conversion to strange matter. This liberates energy, producing a larger, more stable strangelet, which in turn hits another nucleus, catalyzing its conversion to strange matter. In the end, all the nuclei of all the atoms of Earth are converted (assimilated by the Borg strangelets) - and Earth is reduced to a super massive hot lump of strange matter. That would be a hell of a day.

Former nuclear safety officer Walter L. Wagner has been raising safety questions for years. In March 2008, Wagner and another critic of the LHC's safety measures, Luis Sancho, filed a lawsuit in Hawaii's U.S. District Court. The suit calls on the U.S. Department of Energy, Fermilab, the National Science Foundation and CERN to ease up on their LHC preparations for several months while the collider's safety is reassessed. However, similar law suits have failed in the past and are unlikely to prevent the LHC from proceeding. CERN project managers and leading physicists are dismissive of any significant risks. They claim particle collisions “cannot create dangerous things.”

I guess we’ll know soon enough.


Footnotes

(1) It was during a visit to CERN in 1985 that Stephen Hawking contracted pneumonia (life-threatening in his weakened condition) which resulted in acute breathing difficulties. It could only be overcome through a tracheotomy by which Stephen Hawking permanently lost his natural speech ability.

(2) CERN is a central plot element in Dan Brown’s book 'Angels And Demons'. A scientist is found dead at CERN. His murderers appear to have acquired a canister containing a quarter gram of antimatter — an extremely deadly substance with destructive potential comparable to the most powerful nuclear weapons in existence, a potential unleashed upon contact with any form of normal matter. And so a race against time ensues.

(3) The CERN logo is said by some alternative researchers to contain the Antichrist 666 emblem.

(4) The World Wide Web began as a CERN project called ENQUIRE, initiated by Tim Berners-Lee and Robert Cailliau in 1989. Based on the concept of hypertext, the project was aimed at facilitating sharing information among researchers. The first website went on-line in 1991. On 30 April 1993, CERN announced that the World Wide Web would be free to anyone. A copy of the original first webpage, created by Berners-Lee, is kept here.

Article from: http://thecleaver.blogspot.com/2008/04/when-worlds-collide-cern-stargate.html