Thursday, August 27, 2015

THE HEART OF WAR

heartofwar

THE HEART OF WAR

It is always surprising that whenever a conspiracy theory about America being aggressive towards any country is spun in the rumor mill, there are plenty of arm chair strategists that believe that either the United States would “go big” in all of what they do, or that we only defend ourselves and that we never initiate attacks on any one.
The idea is that in war, the United States always plays fair.
History has shown us that when economies tend to get flimsy, the only reply that is provided by big government is the bomb-kill-degrade and destroy reply. War is a business that is either served hot or cold and during a huge bout of the chill, the heart that beats the war drum is the war of covert action.
Most Americans are unaware that small wars are always going on behind the scenes top send messages to other countries to either play ball in the global family or suffer the consequences.
When you are a country that holds the superpower brass ring, you have the ability to destabilize , infiltrate, and exploit with your power and the United States has always had the wonderful talent of finding itself in the middle of civil wars, cross border wars, insurgencies and uprising that tear apart many areas of the world and since the mainstream media evades the issue the American people do not realize that we have our band of mercenaries that cleverly move in to areas in order to perform covert operations.
a-night-vision-eyes
There has always been the mentality, that we must “kill them over there, before they kill us over here” and so whether it is in the name of toppling dictators, installing puppet governments that suit our needs, killing terrorist militants and so on, the United States certainly has the capability to do the dirty deed of killing with the military might and mindset that we expect as citizens of this country.
Sometimes, these covert wars are called “dirty wars.”
It still surprises me that most Americans do not realize that undeclared wars have been launched in countries across the globe and that the extent of the US military’s covert operations and the amount of “collateral damage” are shocking.
Our government tends to speak of radicalization of extremists as some sort of switch that turns on overnight. We hear of lone wolfs that are somehow mesmerized by websites provided by ISIS or some other radical leader and that it is some sort of “I hear and obey” scenario, when the true heart of the battle is covert operations or dirty wars that allow for bombs to be dropped, mass killings, to be made and other indiscriminate killings that would most certainly radicalize whole populations.
It is never ending and as we can see with the body count, it is unwinnable.
A few weeks ago, a cosmic cat was let out of the bag with regard to the Popular Science and Scientific American announcement that Russia, China and the United States were secretly preparing to go to war. The war however was not supposed to be conventional. The war they revealed was going to be fought using advanced space weaponry and that it would be only a matter of time where the first shot across the bow would take place.
To report something this big was a personal victory because many times in the past we have presented shows that would try and expose a secret or covert space program only to have hardliners say that the possibility lacks credibility.
Sometimes it all seems like the Greek myth of Sisyphus who was condemned to forever push a boulder up a hill in Hades, only to see it roll back down each time, and to have to start over from the bottom.
We work hard to get the information out and it is like pushing a rock up hill, and while many people say they do not trust the mainstream media, the often have the tendency to see if the conspiracy theorists are “dead wrong” and they use the mainstream as the litmus test for such outrageous reports.
For the record, we can acknowledge that guest like Captain “K” are outrageous, however beyond the fascinating stories he tells “crazy or not” we know that there is some sort of dirty war or covert operations going on above us.
It was an interesting coincidence that just days after we reported the confirmation of space weaponry from a mainstream source from Reuters to Huffington Post that a number of synchronistic events took place in China.
On August 11, China’s central bank devalued its tightly controlled currency, causing its biggest one-day loss in two decades. The Chinese claimed that the change would help drive the currency toward more market-driven movements. The move also signaled the government’s growing worry about slow growth.
china-stock-market-auto-sales-1024x683
The devaluation of the currency continued and the economic forecast looked grim as the plunge would hurt the United States economy as well.
What happened today with the stock market should be academic for Ground Zero listeners.
U.S. stocks nearly slid off the rails with the Dow Jones industrial average briefly plunging more than 1,000 points in a sell-off that sent a shock wave of fear from Wall Street to Main Street.
Before the market plunged the Drudge Report took a moment to frighten the stock exchange by revealing a holding point that coincidentally was a minus 666.
Stocks regained some of that ground as the day wore on, but the Dow finished with a loss of 588 points, the eighth-worst single-day point decline and the second straight fall of more than 500.
As we reported on the show “Kinetic Retaliation” China was rigging the system to watch it burn.
China’s actions were blamed for the slump because of a global wave of selling touched off by signs of the slowdown just days before. China has the world’s second-largest economy and the devaluation of the money triggered worries among Wall Street professionals and ordinary Americans who are saving for their retirement or a down payment on a house.
After China announced its devaluation process, two massive explosions in the port of Tianjin, northern China, killed more than a hundred people and left hundreds more injured and devastated large areas of the city. The explosions took place at a warehouse at the port which contained hazardous and flammable chemicals, including calcium carbide, sodium cyanide, potassium nitrate, ammonium nitrate and sodium nitrate.
Immediately, a conspiracy yarn was spun out of China that the explosion that took out six city blocks and left a huge crater was a message sent by the United States in the form of a Kinetic weapon dropped from space.
The conspiracy theory began to get some steam as I and several news outlets online reported that the Tianjin explosion was waged as an act of “kinetic retaliation” by the Pentagon in response to China’s currency war Yuan devaluation.
Eland Freeland appeared on Ground Zero to report that one of China’s supercomputers was the target and not the Chemical plan.
It was reported that said the Tianhe-1A supercomputer was forced to shut down for safety reasons. The location where it was housed was within miles of the chemical factory.
The dust had allegedly settled and any information about the investigation was gagged or blacked out.
On Saturday August 22nd 2015 another explosion at another Chemical factory rocked China.
China’s Xinhua state news agency reported that another blast at a chemical factory in the Shandong province. The agency reported that nine people were injured in the explosion. The newspaper “People’s Daily” reported that the explosion’s tremors could be felt within a 5-kilometer (3-mile) radius of the Runxing Chemical Technology Company. The blast shattered windows in the village where the factory is located.
Meanwhile, it was also reported that locals in Tianjin were shocked after thousands of dead fish washed up on shores within 6 kilometers of the Ruihai International Logistics Company warehouse, where the explosion occurred earlier this month.
Obviously, these were very powerful and deadly explosions.
Less than one day after the Shandong, China explosion, another blast ripped through a U.S. Army munitions storage facility near Tokyo, Japan, utterly destroying the facility.
CNGs1Z2UwAAIYun
Keep in mind that all three explosions have happened with 10 days of each other, and that the plunge of the economies is being blamed on what is being called “The Great Fall of China.”
You can start a checklist of all of these coincidences lining up. That is if you believe in these devastating coincidences.
It’s becoming increasingly obvious to everyone that these explosions are not mere coincidence. They are, in fact, part of a dirty war between China and the United States.
The idea of it being initiated by the United States from space only adds to the intrigue and may or may not be the case, however it is looking like it isn’t much of stretch any more.
Can we now assume that China is now retaliating with sabotage and currency warfare?
This latest explosion appears to be an act of retaliation waged by the Chinese against two of China’s greatest enemies: Japan and the United States.
It is also interesting that these explosions happened an hour after it was announced that the United States and Japan announced a revised security agreement in New York that would expand Japan’s role in our alliance with them.
The local police are speculating that the attack was carried out by “Japanese leftists” because two steel pipes were found planted in the ground with electric cables just a few kilometers from the site.
We may be witnessing a dangerously escalating example of covert warfare happening between China and the United States on three fronts.
Cyber warfare, where there have been numerous reports that there have been numerous cyber attacks and hacking of U.S. military personnel records, and seizing control over key infrastructure control systems.
Currency warfare which is already in full force and has been the sole reason why our stock market has plummeted and may still plummet. It is being reported that this is not the end as we can expect to see more currency manipulations from China that are designed to cause economic carnage across America.
And finally, the most speculative and intriguing covert actions, including sabotage and kinetic warfare.
The United States has already shown its superiority in the sky as drone strikes and other attacks have been successful in dealing with their enemies. A senior ISIS operative and second in the terror group’s chain of command, Fadhil Ahmad al-Hayali, was killed in a U.S. military air strike by a drone August 18th, 2015 the White House announced over the weekend.
Al-Hayali, also known as Hajji Mutazz, was traveling in a vehicle near Mosul, Iraq, along with another ISIS operative known as Abu Abdullah when they were hit by a missile fired from a U.S. military drone officials say.
Beyond the usage of drone capabilities and strategy, outer space dominance by the United States is the backbone for our 21st century war effort against new threats against the infrastructure.
The United States depends on space dominance for success, and US national security relies today on a limited number of heavily used satellites. These satellites are crucial for strategic deterrence, surveillance, intelligence gathering, and military communications. If strategic deterrence fails, the satellites become an integral part of offensive and defensive ballistic missile defense.
There have been speculative reports that space platforms, off earth garrisons, and even hyper velocity bundles of effective kinetic weapons exist in space. We also utilize satellites in our strategic defense.
Satellites are pivotal not only for American space superiority but also for information superiority—they are at the heart of the multichannel joint war-fighting machinery that has proven to be successful in recent conflicts.
We were told at the beginning of the year that a “black swan” event would take place and to be on your guard for acts that would change the way we think and alter our behavior.
Be ready, because it looks as if there is a covet war going on and we shall see wars fought on all battlefields and all fronts leaving us confused, frightened and broke.
China2

“The Banksters Did It”: The Central Banks Have Engineered This Financial Collapse

“The Banksters Did It”: The Central Banks Have Engineered This Financial Collapse             ~ could it B "they" R "shedding" the old sys~tum & replacing IT ...wit the "new"  ...1  ...folks where's the $$$ go~in/gone ...it just doesn't go fucking ...puff !    

Region: ,
central-banks-economy
Good news, everybody! The markets are rebounding! Yes, we just a hit a minor bump in the road there, but don’t worry, everything is back to normal now. Let’s forget about the tail end of last week and this week’s Black Monday, shall we? Pay no mind to the uncomfortable low lights of the global stock rout:
Nope, nothing to see here. And now that this dead cat bounce is underway, surely there will be no more commodity deflation or global economic slowdown or worldwide currency war orhistorically unprecedented bond bubbles to worry about, right?
deadcatbounce
OK, enough sarcasm. Readers of this column will know by now that the phony baloney stock markets, manipulated as they are from top to bottom and juiced as they are on the Fed’s QE heroin, are no longer reflective of economic reality. The only question is how far this particular dead cat market will bounce, and whether it will be helped along with more heroin from the Fed.
But there is already one vitally important take away from these events that the independent media must articulate now, before it’s too late. Namely: This crisis was engineered by the central banks. It is their fault.
Let me repeat that again in case you missed it: This crisis was engineered by the central banks.
stock-market-bubbleThis point is not even controversial. It has been the universal consensus of institutions ranging from the Bank for International Settlements to the Official Monetary and Financial Institutions Forum, and from OECD officials toformer Fed Governors and even Alan “Bubbles” Greenspan himself.
In fact, analyst after analyst and pundit after pundit–including the most mainstream of mainstream publications–have been sounding the alarm on the stock market bubble for much of the past year.
This tells us two things: the current market mayhem was perfectly predictable (and predicted), and the central banks not only stayed the course but actually doubled down with more and more QE injections.
It is the central banks that have created this mess, and what’s more they have created this mess in the full knowledge that their actions would lead to disaster. And now, one can be sure, the same central bankers and their political puppet mouthpieces will use this crisis to continue the construction of the “New World Order” that they called for in the wake of the 2008 collapse.
Anyone who can’t see the endgame now–global government by the bankers, of the bankers and for the bankers–is either blind or wilfully ignorant.
It is especially important to state these obvious truths now, because we can already see a false narrative underway. This narrative has two main thrusts: one is to paint China as the culprit for the global downturn and the other is to assume that only central banks can save the day (with even greater liquidity injections and even deeper rate cuts).
The China-as-economic-villain narrative ranges from the subdued (“China’s ‘Black Monday’ sends markets reeling across the globe“) to the blatant (“Chinese Economy Causes Markets to Fall“) to the silly (“Don Yuan Causes Heartbreak“), but they all convey the same message: China has brought this on the world all by itself. It’s not that China is reacting to a global monetary environment created by the Fed and fostered by other central banks, or a global economic slowdown that is biting into a heavily export-driven economy, or the conflicting pressures on the country as it tries to navigate its way toward global reserve currency status. Nope, it’s just a bull in a china shop (or is that a China in a bull market?) knocking things over and causing mayhem (Trump was right!).
central-bankers-28-2The only-central-banks-can-save-us narrative is even more infantile, but also more dangerous. We are told that the crash came because China’s central bank failed to act. We are told that it’s now up to Turkey’s central bank to bolster the flagging lira. We are told that the Lehman collapse occurred because of too little central bank intervention. We are told that only the European Central Bank is capable of “riding to the rescue” and preventing a market rout.
In other words the very same institutions that engineered this crisis are the only ones that can save us.
It is the height of insanity that anyone would believe this nonsense, but then again the world fell for it after Lehman, and they’re likely to fall for it again. Unless we spread the word.
The banksters did it. And unless we derail their agenda, they’re going to do it again.

ANOTHER EDUCATION RANT: THE LATEST BUFFOONERY IN AMAIRIKUN EDGYKAYSHUN: “MICROAGGRESSION”  ~ hehe boys & girls after yer done read~in  ...geet thum mittens & fucking HELMETS  ...back the fuck ...on   Oops https://www.google.com/search?q=funny+pic+of+wearing+mittens+%26+helmets&sa=X&biw=1920&bih=979&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&ved=0CB0QsARqFQoTCPKNrtuWyccCFUYbPgodDmoHRw#imgrc=ze8bhKN5HlJqQM%3A

Well, the wackiness and somersaulting idiocy of Amairikun edgykayshun continues to rocket the country into fourth world status(that's below third world, folks), as the latest trendy fad coming out of quackademia is "micro-aggression." Yes, you read that correctly: micro-aggression. Here's the article, shared by Mr. C.S:
The Coddling of the American Mind
I don't even know where to begin on this one, I'm so purple with outrage at what is happening. The article seems to want to blame this on Republithugs and Dummycrooks, and the increasing polarization of the country. And it seeks - in my opinion somewhat meretriciiously - to detach the current trend of "microaggression" from the previous "political correctness" movement of the 1970s and 1980s, as if the latter had somehow gone away.
It’s difficult to know exactly why vindictive protectiveness has burst forth so powerfully in the past few years. The phenomenon may be related to recent changes in the interpretation of federal antidiscrimination statutes (about which more later). But the answer probably involves generational shifts as well. Childhood itself has changed greatly during the past generation. Many Baby Boomers and Gen Xers can remember riding their bicycles around their hometowns, unchaperoned by adults, by the time they were 8 or 9 years old. In the hours after school, kids were expected to occupy themselves, getting into minor scrapes and learning from their experiences. But “free range” childhood became less common in the 1980s. The surge in crime from the ’60s through the early ’90s made Baby Boomer parents more protective than their own parents had been. Stories of abducted children appeared more frequently in the news, and in 1984, images of them began showing up on milk cartons. In response, many parents pulled in the reins and worked harder to keep their children safe.
...These same children grew up in a culture that was (and still is) becoming more politically polarized. Republicans and Democrats have never particularly liked each other, but survey data going back to the 1970s show that on average, their mutual dislike used to be surprisingly mild. Negative feelings have grown steadily stronger, however, particularly since the early 2000s. Political scientists call this process “affective partisan polarization,” and it is a very serious problem for any democracy. As each side increasingly demonizes the other, compromise becomes more difficult. A recent study shows that implicit or unconscious biases are now at least as strong across political parties as they are across races.
The article seems to imply that we need more psycholigization of education, with a healthy dollop - a big shiny amorphous glob - of more "behavioral therapy" to sort out our "issues":
It’s difficult to know exactly why vindictive protectiveness has burst forth so powerfully in the past few years. The phenomenon may be related to recent changes in the interpretation of federal antidiscrimination statutes (about which more later). But the answer probably involves generational shifts as well. Childhood itself has changed greatly during the past generation. Many Baby Boomers and Gen Xers can remember riding their bicycles around their hometowns, unchaperoned by adults, by the time they were 8 or 9 years old. In the hours after school, kids were expected to occupy themselves, getting into minor scrapes and learning from their experiences. But “free range” childhood became less common in the 1980s. The surge in crime from the ’60s through the early ’90s made Baby Boomer parents more protective than their own parents had been. Stories of abducted children appeared more frequently in the news, and in 1984, images of them began showing up on milk cartons. In response, many parents pulled in the reins and worked harder to keep their children safe.
The flight to safety also happened at school. Dangerous play structures were removed from playgrounds; peanut butter was banned from student lunches. After the 1999 Columbine massacre in Colorado, many schools cracked down on bullying, implementing “zero tolerance” policies. In a variety of ways, children born after 1980—the Millennials—got a consistent message from adults: life is dangerous, but adults will do everything in their power to protect you from harm, not just from strangers but from one another as well.These same children grew up in a culture that was (and still is) becoming more politically polarized. Republicans and Democrats have never particularly liked each other, but survey data going back to the 1970s show that on average, their mutual dislike used to be surprisingly mild. Negative feelings have grown steadily stronger, however, particularly since the early 2000s. Political scientists call this process “affective partisan polarization,” and it is a very serious problem for any democracy. As each side increasingly demonizes the other, compromise becomes more difficult. A recent study shows that implicit or unconscious biases are now at least as strong across political parties as they are across races.
I don't know about you, but I'm not buying. IN fact, I rather strongly suspect that this type of psychologization of "education" in the USA shares a major part of the responsibility for the disaster.The real problem is very simple: by and large, Americans - including the so-called American power elite - are stupid. Don't believe me? Just look at the idiots running for President in both political parties. With but a few exceptions, these are not terribly well-educated people. Clever, yes. Educated, no. To be sure, some of them have degrees, but one must ask, what, really, is a degree from an American insitution really worth(besides a lot of debt to obtain a lisence to pratice a job that probably won't be there anyway upon graduation)? We have been deliberately dumbed down by an education profession focused more upon "method and pedagogy" and all the psychologization that goes with it, than we have been on content of a discipline and the ability to argue positions. The shift from content profession to method-oriented instruction has resulted in a similar shift in what "argumentation" means in the American academic context, for content must be replaced with something, and in this case, it's emotions, i.e., the focus on the self and its emotional needs, desires, and psychology. In such a quackademic culture, it is easy to become offended, because there is no other content or preoccupation in focus. Indeed, in a real academic culture, "microaggressions" would diminish simply because people would be far too busy trying to learn literature, or calculus, or biology, and wouldn't have time for such nonsense, including the nonsense of "being offended" - when no offense was intended or implied - at every little remark.  It is a measure of how coddled the American "mind" is that, throughout the entire article, there is almost no mention of content, but a great deal of focus on psychology.  It's a world of make-believe in which the "cloud" and "ebooks" are tailor-made for "adjustment" to everyone's "sensistivities," and the danger, of course, is that history and human memory itself can be adjusted.
Increasingly I come to the sad realization that the system is irretrievably broken, and not fixable. More computers, more technology, more homework, more standardized tests, more teacher hours, more stringent "credentialing" requirements, more studies, more money, more classroom time, more method, are not going to fix it. They created the mess.
And this means, if you're a parent, that you have to teach your children, and hence educate yourself, on your own. And if you're a student at one of America's university indoctrination centers, this means that you will have to educate yourself.

Looking to future, more NCAA athletes seek own trademarks     ~ hehe um think~in 'bout it 2 ... hows  shit on a stick ...sound , yea SOS  ???  Oops
http://www.shutterstock.com/s/poop/search.html?page=1&inline=253044478

BOSTON (AP) -- Like their counterparts in the pros, more college football stars are starting to snatch up trademark rights to their names, nicknames and fan slogans.
The NCAA generally forbids its players from cashing in on their athletic success, but by gaining legal ownership of phrases tied to their personal brands, players can pave the way for lucrative licensing deals in the future and can prevent others from exploiting their names.
This month, Ohio State University running back Ezekiel Elliott applied for trademarks to use his nicknames ''Zeke'' and ''Eze'' on merchandise, according to records in a public database kept by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Elliott also filed for a trademark on the restaurant name ''Zeke's Crop Top Bar and Grill,'' a nod to the junior's preference to roll his jersey up like a crop top. Elliott was unavailable for comment, and his father declined to explain the trademarks.
At Mississippi State University, quarterback Dak Prescott applied for the trademark on his name last fall, along with ''Dak Attack'' and ''Who Dak,'' phrases that fans have waved aloft on game-day signs.
Others to pursue trademarks while in college include NFL quarterbacks Johnny Manziel and Jameis Winston, both Heisman Trophy winners. Before transferring to TCU, quarterback Kenny Hill's family sought a trademark on ''Kenny Trill'' but later abandoned the application.
In professional sports, athletes routinely snag trademarks for their nicknames and taglines, and then companies pay hefty sums to use their monikers on merchandise.
Marshawn Lynch of the Seattle Seahawks, for example, owns rights to ''Beast Mode.'' Charlotte Hornets point guard Jeremy Lin has ''Linsanity.'' The company that represents Tim Tebow of the Philadelphia Eagles owns the trademark to ''Tebowing.''
As the practice has become more common in the pros, some universities and lawyers are encouraging college athletes to follow suit.
''They're becoming these public personas at these universities, and why not capitalize on that?'' said Matthew Swyers, CEO of the Trademark Company, which helped Elliott submit his trademark applications.
With a trademark in hand, Swyers said, college athletes will be one step ahead when they start pursuing licensing deals after school.
Specifically, the athletes are asking for the legal right to sell a wide range of merchandise branded with their names, from jerseys and hats to toddler onesies.
Landing those rights can also be a defensive maneuver against so-called trademark poachers.
If athletes don't secure trademarks, anyone else can apply for ownership at a cost of about $200. To wrestle it back, athletes can face long and costly court battles.
''Filing a trademark application is a very simple process,'' said Ryan Hilbert, a Jacksonville attorney who specializes in intellectual property and sports law. ''People will jump in as quickly as they can to file for marks that are coined by athletes.''
Manziel famously claimed the trademark to ''Johnny Football'' in 2013 amid a legal battle with a company that had been selling T-shirts using his nickname.
At Mississippi State, Prescott faced a similar situation when a man started making T-shirts with his name.
''It was kind of cool at first, because it's sort of a dream to see T-shirts with your name on it, but then you realize it could be a problem,'' Prescott told the Associated Press.
Under the advice of lawyers, he applied for the trademarks and then sued the T-shirt maker last year, who agreed to stop.
''I'm not doing anything with them now,'' Prescott said of the trademarks, ''but when I get done playing in college, I have the option of using them.''
Although experts said the practice is growing, it's mostly limited to a small group of big-name athletes. Officials at the universities of Florida, Oregon and California said they hadn't heard of any students interested in pursuing trademarks.
''I think it's just something that a lot of student athletes aren't aware of,'' said Mit Winter, a Kansas City sports law lawyer who has represented the NCAA and the NFL.
Still, some experts see the trademark trend as one more blow to the notion of amateurism in the NCAA.
''Athletes are gaining more and more rights in connection with their performance on the field,'' said Hilbert, the Jacksonville attorney.
Recently, the NCAA lost a court ruling that found students are entitled to compensation when their likenesses are used commercially. It stemmed from a lawsuit filed by former UCLA basketball star Ed O'Bannon. The NCAA is appealing.
The judge in that case is now considering whether to grant class-action status to other current and former athletes who are suing the NCAA and aim to abolish the league's prohibition against competitively paying players.
Many universities, meanwhile, have stopped selling jerseys with the numbers of current players, in part because of legal concerns.
Hilbert predicts that, as universities shine the spotlight away from individual athletes, more players will step in to take ownership of their own brands.
''It's a gradual move toward commercializing the sport,'' Hilbert said. ''As the demarcation between amateurism and professionalism further erodes, you're going to see these guys get even more savvy about branding matters.''
---
AP Sports Writer David Brandt contributed to this report from Jackson, Mississippi.