THOSE EMERGING DOCTOR DEATHS: THE THEORY OF JIM MARRS, AND UNCOMFORTABLE PARALLELS WITH THE GMO ISSUE ~ hehe how's that
"old alchemical practice"... hows that work in fer ya Huh , them gmo's, cem trails, vac's & ??? hows that go'in ,i know i didn't fucking ASK 4 it ! ..did u ! but fucking guess, fucking what "we" r geet'in IT ! Huh ole, A
Read the excerpt: The story of four prominent doctors connected to the autism debate
I suspect, however, that there is more going on in the whole big pharma-big government effort to hide and suppress findings contradictory to their medical dogmas. My "high octane suspicions" are outlined by the following comments of Mr. Marrs on each of these four doctors:
1. Brian Hooker:
Brian Hooker holds a doctorate degree in biochemical engineering and has a teenage son with autism. Motivated by his son's condition and with the help of two congressmen, Hooker spent almost ten years submitting over one hundred Freedom of Information Acts requests to the CDC for data linking mercury-filled thimerosal in vaccines to various disorders. He received thousands of documents, but with many key components blacked out. These documents included five CDC studies on thimerosal and autism written prior to 2004 that rejected the connection between thimerosal and autism
But not only are there Mon(ster)santo-style blacked out areas of
documents (one can only assume that what's blacked out isn't too
flattering to big pharma and its claims for its vaccines, otherwise,
there would be nothing to hide, would there?), there are also
indications that this is precisely the case:
According to Hooker, a 2009 study hid data regarding the only valid part of the study (i.e., prenatal thimerosal exposure), which showed that children exposed to just sixteen micrograms of mercury in thimerosal in utero were up to eight times more likely to receive a diagnosis of regressive autism.
2. The Notorious Case of Dr. Andrew Wakefield:
One need only consider these two paragraphs to conclude that there is an ongoing Vaccine-gate with a huge cover-up:
Andrew Wakefield, a British former surgeon and medical researcher, supported Hooker in his effort to find the truth. Wakefield is a controversial figure who has been castigated by the medical establishment and the mainstream media. His Wikipedia page states that the doctor is "known for his fraudulent 1998 research paper in support of the now-discredited claim that there is a link between the administration of the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism and other ailments." And in 2010, a five-member tribunal of the British General Medical Council (GMC) found Wakefield guilty of dishonesty and twelve counts involving the abuse of developmentally challenged children. He was barred from practicing medicine and the British medical journal The Lancet retracted his 1998 paper.Yet Wakefield's claims are not nearly as outlandish as they have been made to seem by the media. In late 2011, the Strategic Autism Initiative (SAI), an autism research foundation, announced an investigation into Wakefield's claims headed by Dr. David Lewis, former senior-level research microbiologist for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and a member of the National Whistleblowers Center (NWC) board of directors. The SAI rejected the assertion that Wakefield's claim was fraudulent. Further research has continued to support the doctor. More than twenty-six studies in the U.S., Canada, Venezuela, and Italy replicated Wakefield's 1998 findings but have not been widely publicized.
3. Dr. Thomas Verstraeten and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr:
If all this isn't enough to convince you that something is rotten
in the realm of vaccine dogmas, consider the case of Dr. Verstraeten,
who could not make the "statistical link" between thimerisol and autism
go away, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s reportage:
Dr. Thomas Verstraeten is one such case. Verstraeten entered the vaccine fray when he authored a 2001 study whose initial phase seemed to indicate a potential link between thimerosal and autism. However, by 2003, Verstraeten said his study ultimately did not support such a link, and he became a supporter of the vaccines. He was accused of yielding to outside pressure to alter studies indicating a link between thimerosal and autism. One internal CDC document obtained after a FOIA request, showed Verstraeten sent an email that many have interpreted as referring to his difficulty in making the statistical association between thimerosal and autism disappear with the words, "It just won't go away."In June 2005, Rolling Stone published an article written by Robert F. Kennedy Jr. entitled "Deadly Immunity," which claimed that the federal government and the pharmaceutical industry colluded to withhold information concerning vaccine safety. Kennedy also accused Verstraeten of modifying his data to fit the CDC's claim that there is no link between thimerosal and autism, an accusation that Verstraeten has vehemently denied. Yet his personal career choices suggest something sinister: shortly after publishing his findings, Verstraeten left the CDC for a position with the pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline.
4. And finally, the pro-vaccine Dr. Paul Thorsen:
n 2014, Thorsen was indicted for fraud and stealing grant money while working for the CDC. The CDC had awarded him grant money for research in Denmark involving infant disabilities, autism, genetic disorders, and fetal alcohol syndrome. According to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' inspector general, Thorsen reportedly diverted more than $1 million of the CDC grant money to his own personal bank account and submitted fraudulent invoices on CDC letterhead to medical facilities assisting in the research for reimbursement of work allegedly covered by the grants.
Marrs comes to this conclusion, follwing the adage sequere pecunia:
However, I think there's an even deeper, "high octane" speculative possibility lurking in the background here. Granted, big pharma is to "medicine" what big agribusiness is to "GMO foods." You'll note that in both cases the mercantilist practices are almos identical: big corporations move their personnel in and out of government regulatory agencies with impunity, and money buys compliance with their pre-established dogmas, both in the form of pay-offs and in the form of the suppression of data. But that other "high octane speculative possibility" is even murkier, and my co-author in Transhumanism: A Grimoire of Alchemical Agendas, Dr. Scott DeHart, and I wrote about them there, and that is that the ingestion of heavy (and toxic) metals is an old alchemical practice, one indulged for the "transformation" of mankind itself. In other words, the possibility arises that beyond obscene profits from human suffering, there is another much more covert agenda altogether, and that is the alchemical transformation of mankind, by a vast "expansion" of human consciousness. And autistic people, we are told, are people who cannot filter anything out; they see, hear, and experience everything on an unimaginable cacophony of both "signal" and "noise", and do so with emotional depth we cannot imagine, for the normal "filtration" sytem is absent. In short, the terrible implication of this high octane speculation is not only does big pharma know about the connection, but also that certain individuals with their own covert and esoteric agendas want the outcomes that we see, for whatever reason. And if that be the case, then the whole industry stands indicted as practising the very worst form of pseudo-science in pursuit of some nebulous "alchemical" agenda. Thus, the parallels of methods being used to quash evidence and debate to the contrary between big pharma and their GMO counterparts is, on this view, anything but accidental. For these scantily disguised fascist monsters, humanity itself is both the playing field, and the lab rat, and toxis GMOs, vaccines, and mind manipulation technologies of a very different nature, are the ultimate means not only to control the population but to transform it, and, along the way, to make lots of money."In order to find out who is in the right in the vaccine debate, one need only follow the money. Mass inoculations bring more than $25 billion in revenues to the giant pharmaceutical firms and their hirelings while physicians and researchers who question mass vaccinations make nothing. In fact, many of them risk loss of income and ostracism from the conventional medical establishment. Meanwhile, those who trumpet the benefits of vaccines and downplay their risks can profit enormously."
No comments:
Post a Comment