Egypt is Burning
For the past week, Israel’s news broadcasts have
focused on the situation in Egypt. Just over a week ago, millions of
Egyptian citizens took the streets in Cairo and all over the country,
calling for the resignation of President Mohamed Morsi. Morsi is the
head of the Muslim Brotherhood and in the aftermath of the Egyptian
revolution of 2011, was elected president of Egypt after his party won
the largest bloc of seats in the Egyptian parliament. His is an
Islamist party which calls for the adoption of Sharia law throughout the
Muslim world. His party is anti-Western, although Morsi has had to
make accommodations to enable the US to continue providing much-needed
financial aid to the country’s collapsing economy. Representatives of
the Sunni Muslim Brotherhood are behind forces of instability in many
countries throughout the Arab world, including among the rebel forces in
Syria. The Muslim Brotherhood is the parent organization of the Hamas
in Gaza.
From the beginning of the Arab unrest more than two years
ago, many in the west, and especially President Obama, identified the
unrest as a call for greater democracy and liberty. While there were
and continue to be Egyptians and others in the Arab world who truly
desire a freer society, democratic values are not well known nor
understood in the Middle East. Indeed, in many cases, it is the most
undemocratic forces in the area who study the principles of democracy
well in order to manipulate the weaknesses of democracy to obtain their
own undemocratic ends.
Egypt is a case in point. For decades, Mubarak governed
Egypt with an iron hand. There was no freedom of the press and the
political process was far from free. But Mubarak was determined to
restrain the Muslim Brotherhood, because he understood that their
particular brand of totalitarianism would create far more instability
than his. It was the Muslim Brotherhood who assassinated Sadat, who
supported terrorist groups in Gaza and in Egypt and who represented the
most extreme of Islamist ideology. They were Mubarak’s enemies and many
rotted in his jails.
When the Egyptians took to the streets two years ago, the
Muslim Brotherhood was the most organized of the political and social
groups in Egypt and they were the ones most ready to mount an election
campaign. As President Obama announced his betrayal of staunch US ally,
Mubarak, because of this corruptness and lack of democratic values, the
Muslim Brotherhood was taking advantage of one of the hallmarks of
democracy, free elections, to gain power. Little attention was paid in
the western media to the fact that while the Muslim Brotherhood favored
free elections, their political agenda was anything but democratic.
That did become clear as debates over the Egyptian
constitution reached a boiling point and the truly democratic minority
in Egypt withdrew from the constitutional committee because of the farce
it had become. Unrest built as Morsi tried to force his brand of Islam
down the throats of Egyptians and finally chaos erupted once more last
week. The army stepped in, another non-democratic institution (by
definition) and forced Morsi’s resignation. Today’s paper tells us that
the US is pressuring the army to continue holding dialogue with the
Muslim Brotherhood.
Once again, it seems as if the US confuses democratic
processes with democratic values. And pursuing the former in a society
that has not fully assimilated the latter is a recipe for disaster. It
reminds me of the rhetoric we heard several years ago in the US with
regard to Iran. Upon assuming office for the first time, Obama called
for frank discussions with Ahmedinejad, refusing to understand that the
western propensity for discussion is viewed by our totalitarian
neighbors as a vehicle for buying time.
Free elections carry no value if they produce a
non-democratic government. And in countries where democracy has not
been carefully adopted and absorbed by the people, chaos is often
mistakenly identified as democracy and freedom. Another example from
just last week in Egypt: As millions took to the streets, there is no
question that they expressed their desire for change in a direct and
unmistakable way. But democracy is based on representation – elections
for parliament or president which then conveys the power of the people
to the elected representatives who run the country. A country which
changes its leadership based on how many people take to the streets, is
an unstable country. Indeed, Morsi’s supporters also took to the
streets and today, a few days after Morsi was deposed, his supporters
are fighting with his opponents in the streets and only the army, a very
undemocratic force, is preventing further bloodshed. But the story
gets worse. Those in the streets demonstrating for freedom suffered
terribly at the hands of those who took advantage of the chaos. It is
said that dozens of woman were raped or sexually harassed while
protesting on the streets of Cairo. This is not a society ready for
democracy.
There is a huge problem in our area and western analysts
are just beginning to understand it. But as residents of this crazy
neighborhood for more than 65 years, Israelis are far more cynical about
the chances of our neighbors adopting democracy anytime soon. We live
in an area where religious fanaticism is growing, where violence is not
only condoned but applauded, where strength is measured by destruction
rather than by courage and the pursuit of a valued existence. Civil war
rages in Syria and may well be spilling over into Turkey and Jordan.
As the various countries in the Middle East take sides in the Syrian
conflict, it is shaping up as a Sunni / Shiite conflict, bringing to the
fore extremist religious passions with roots in the early days of
Islam. It is the past that shapes the passions of the region, not the
hope for a better tomorrow.
Israel is an island of sanity in an ocean of chaos. All
the more reason for us to guard against infiltrators from every side.
As US Secretary of State John Kerry prepares for yet another trip to
Israel, to try and jump-start talks between Israel and the Palestinians,
we would all do well to take a good look around us. The Palestinians
are no more democratic than their Egyptian, Syrian and Jordanian
neighbors and co-religionists. We dare not invite such chaos in our
midst. And all countries who value democracy would do well to take
caution. Democratic elections don’t necessarily usher in democracy,
peace talks don’t necessarily usher in peace. Without the values of
liberty, dignity and respect for your fellow man, without the profound
belief that every human being was created in the image of G-d and that
life is sacred, one side’s conversations will remain the other side’s
cynical manipulations.
No comments:
Post a Comment