EXO-VATICANA
(Pt 21)
Petrus Romanus, PROJECT LUCIFER, and the Vatican's astonishing exo-theological plan for the arrival of an alien savior.
You only think you know what's coming...
Posted: April 9, 2013
8:00 am Eastern
[xvii]
http://www.redicecreations.com/specialreports/2006/04apr/jesuitbloodoath.html.
Petrus Romanus, PROJECT LUCIFER, and the Vatican's astonishing exo-theological plan for the arrival of an alien savior.
You only think you know what's coming...
Posted: April 9, 2013
8:00 am Eastern
PART
21: THE ALIENS
AND...
|
The Arrival of Petrus RomanusBy Tom Horn & Cris Putnam |
To
say some of our
sanctified
speculations have been
confirmed given the
election of Pope
Francis I is
an
understatement.
Pope
Benedict XVI’s
February 11, 2013
announcement—as
forecast in our book Petrus
Romanus—was
unprecedented because
the last pope to
resign was Gregory XII
in 1415, nearly six
hundred years ago. We
did not venture this
hypothesis uninformed.
In his book, Light
of the World: The
Pope, the Church, and
the Signs of the Times,
when asked if he
thought it appropriate
for a pope to retire,
Pope Benedict XVI
responded, “If a
pope clearly realizes
that he is no longer
physically,
psychologically and
spiritually capable of
handling the duties of
his office, then he
has a right and, under
some circumstances,
also an obligation to
resign.”[i]
Thus,
based on a conflation
of prophecy and
current events we went
out on a limb, taking
a risky position on
pages 57–58 of this
volume by asserting
that Benedict XVI
would step down for
reasons related to
health concerns.
Indeed, it came to
pass and many former
skeptics picked up Petrus
Romanus
in earnest.
As
the reader may be
aware, we correlated
Pope Benedict’s
predisposition to
retire with the work
of the Jesuit scholar,
René Thibaut, who
predicted over 60
years ago that the
door would be opened
for the arrival of the
final pope on
Malachy’s list in
2012. Of course, the
year 2012 came and
went with seemingly no
fulfillment.
Consequently, we were
a little disappointed
when it seemed like
Thibaut was mistaken.
All the same,
Thibaut’s
code-breaking work is
a relatively small
portion of our
book’s content, so
we never felt our work
was made irrelevant.
As it turns out,
however, Thiabut was
far more
correct—astoundingly
so—than anyone would
ever imagine until
February 2013!
According to the New
York Times:
That
the resignation [by
Benedict XVI] was long
in the planning was
confirmed by Giovanni
Maria Vian, the editor
of the Vatican
newspaper, L’Osservatore
Romano, who wrote
on Monday that the
pope’s decision
“was taken many
months ago,” after
his trip to Mexico and
Cuba in March 2012,
“and kept with a
reserve that no one
could violate.”[ii]
In
other words, Pope
Benedict officially
and secretly resigned
right when Thibaut—and
we—speculated he
would in 2012, and
then his February 11,
2013 public
affirmation was
quickly punctuated by
a dramatic lightning
bolt striking St.
Peter’s basilica.[iii]
Whether one agrees
with his theology or
not, credit must be
given where it is due.
Thibaut accurately
predicted this
changing of the guard
over sixty years
prior. Pope
Benedict’s South
American tour was
ongoing as the first
edition of our book
went to print and it
is now evident that he
decided to step down
simultaneous with its
release exactly when
the Belgian Jesuit
said he would—sixty
years prior. This is
also evidenced by the
fact that renovations
to a property hosting
Benedict’s
retirement home ensued
in 2012 as well.[iv]
Thus,
with two living Pontificus
Maximi, we have
entered into terra
incognita as far
as the modern papacy
is concerned. This
brings us to the new
pope.
According
to the prophecy of St.
Malachy, Peter the
Roman has arrived.
Pope Francis, formerly
known as Jorge Mario
Bergoglio the son of
Italian immigrants to
Argentina, has assumed
the 112th
position on
Malachy’s famous
list. While shallow
skeptics were quick to
point out that “his
name is not Peter,”
their complaint
betrays ignorance of
the way the Malachy
prophecy works.
We have stated from
the beginning that the
title “Peter the
Roman” was symbolic.
All popes claim
apostolic succession
from Peter and, for
this reason, it is
called the Petrine
office. They claim to
sit on the chair of
St. Peter and in this
way all popes are
Peters. For instance,
in an interview with World
Net Daily prior to
the Pope Francis
election, Tom Horn was
quoted thus:
Regardless,
Horn said he’s
always maintained that
it doesn’t take
someone whose
Christian name is
Peter to fulfill the
prophecy. “In fact,
if any Italian is
elected, that would be
a fairly transparent
fulfillment,” he
said. Moreover, he
argued, “in a very
general sense, every
pope could be regarded
as ‘Peter the
Roman,’ and in that
sense, this could be
the last one.”[v]
Real
scholars who studied
the Malachy prophecy
down through time
unanimously came to a
similar
conclusion—that the
title Petrus
Romanus (“Peter
the Roman”) was
symbolic and not
indicative of a birth
name any more than Gloria
Olivae (the 111th
line in the prophecy
of the popes, the one
for Pope Benedict XVI)
was Cardinal
Ratzinger’s given
name before he became
Pope Benedict XVI,
naming himself after
the founder of the
Benedictine Order, of
which the Olivetans
are one branch in
order to fulfill his
place in the prophecy.
Over sixty years ago,
Thibaut similarly
rejected the
possibility of a pope
literally named Peter
and wrote that the
name symbolized the
totality of the
papacy:
We therefore
reject the Roman
appointed Peter as the
impossible Peter II.
There is only one
Peter, the first of
the Roman pontiffs,
and he is seen in his
many successors. He
still to serve is the
final as in the first
persecution. We
believe Petrus Romanus
represents all the
Roman Pontiffs from
St. Peter to the
recipient Gloria
Olivae.[vi]
In
Thibaut’s reckoning,
the meaning of "Petrus"
is that all the
ambitions and
pretensions of the
papal dynasty are now
encompassed in one
man, Pope Francis.
This was our position
as well, but we were
more than a little
astounded recently
when the
Archpriest of St.
Peter's Basilica,
Cardinal Angelo
Comastri acknowledged
how Petrus Romanus
is incarnate in Pope
Francis. In
discussing details of
the new Pope’s April
1, 2013 visit to St.
Peter’s tomb in the
necropolis under the
basilica, Comastri
said:
We then made a second stop before the funerary stele of a man called Istatilio. He was certainly Christian: on his grave is the monogram [chi-rho] of Christ. On the stele is inscribed: ‘He was at peace with everyone and never caused strife.’ The Pope, after reading the phrase, looked at us and said, ‘That is a beautiful program of life.’ Climbing back up the stairs and having reached the Clementine Chapel, Pope Francis became absorbed in prayer and repeated with a loud voice the three professions of Peter: “Lord, You are the Christ, Son of the Living God”; “Lord, to whom do we go? You have the words of eternal life”; “Lord, You know all things! You know that I love you!” At that moment, we had the distinct impression that the life of Peter rose out of centuries past and became present and living in the current Successor of the Apostle Peter. [http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=17490]
In
addition to this
incredible fulfillment
of the Malachy
prophecy, many
scholars of various
schools of thought see
Bible prophecy in
general near its
climax. In fact,
events in Israel also
fell in place just as
the first edition of
the book Petrus
Romanus forecast a
year prior. In chapter
16, “The Burdensome
Stone,” we wrote
about an obscure,
under-the-table deal
concerning the Hall of
the Last Supper on
Mount Zion, and it
seems that deal has
been consummated.
Reporter Shlomo Cesana
broke the story in the
Israel
Hayom newsletter
on January 30, 2013:
A
historical agreement
has been signed
between Israel and the
Vatican, ending a 20
year dispute. Israel
has granted the pope
an official seat in
the room where the
Last Supper is
believed to have taken
place, on Mount Zion
in Jerusalem.[vii]
Even
though it is being
ignored by the
mainstream media, this
is momentous because
end-time prophecy
plays out in Jerusalem
and now, for the first
time since the
reformation of Israel
in 1948, the
Roman Pontiff has an
official seat on Mount
Zion. Watch for
Pope Francis to visit
Israel more than once
and pay attention to
the details.
Accordingly, Hal
Lindsey agrees with us
that exegesis of
Revelation 13:11–18
implies the final pope
is likely the false
prophet:
The
Apostle John in the
Book of the Revelation
describes very plainly
how the leader of the
world religious system
(based in Rome) will
pave the way for the
rise of the man who
will be the
Antichrist.
Unfortunately for that
churchman, the
Antichrist and the
False Prophet will
later turn on him and
destroy the religious
system and the city.[viii]
Another
interesting and
possibly noteworthy
aspect of the Final
Pope is the timing of
his arrival. While we
don’t normally put a
lot of stock in
numerology, mystics do
and the great biblical
scholar and Anglican
theologian, Ethelbert
W. Bullinger, wrote an
exhaustive treatise in
the nineteenth century
which has yielded some
interesting
connections to the new
pontiff. The numbers
surrounding Pope
Francis’ election
keep coming up thirteen.
White smoke at 7:06
p.m.: 7 + 6 = 13; he
is 76 years old: 7 + 6
= 13; he was elected
on the calendar date
3/13/13, which sports
two thirteens of its
own; 3/13/2013 also
yields 3 + 1 + 3 + 2 +
0 + 1 + 3 = 13; he was
announced at precisely
8:13 p.m. Vatican
time, or, in military
and European time
20:13, making for an
astounding 3/13/2013
at 20:13. According to
Bullinger:
As
to the significance of
thirteen, all
are aware that it has
come down to us as a
number of ill-omen.
Many superstitions
cluster around it, and
various explanations
are current concerning
them.
Unfortunately,
those who go backwards
to find a reason
seldom go back far
enough. The popular
explanations do not,
so far as we are
aware, go further back
than the Apostles. But
we must go back to the
first occurrence
of the number thirteen
in order to discover
the key to its
significance. It
occurs first in
Genesis 14:4, where we
read “Twelve
years they served
Chedorlaomer, and the thirteenth
year they REBELLED.”
Hence
every occurrence of
the number thirteen,
and likewise of every
multiple of it,
stamps that with which
it stands in
connection with rebellion,
apostasy,
defection,
corruption,
disintegration,
revolution,
or some kindred idea.[ix]
This
ill omen suggests the
apostasy prophesied by
Paul (2 Thessalonians
2:3) and the many
Revelation judgments
along with the “many
tribulations” and
destruction of Rome
predicted by the
Malachy prophecy.
Bullinger goes on to
cite these remarkably
suggestive numerical
concurrences:
θηρίον
(theerion),
beast = 247 (13x19)
“He
had two horns” =
1521 (132x9)
“And
he had two horns like
a lamb” = 2704 (132x16)
Revelation
13:11, The whole verse
= 6318 (13x486)[x]
“And
I beheld another beast
coming up out of the
earth; and he had two
horns like a lamb, and
he spake as a
dragon” (Revelation
13:11). Indeed this
second beast—the
false prophet—is
predicted to be viewed
“like a lamb” and
the accolades afforded
the new pontiff on
3/13/2013 at 20:13
support that notion.
As Protestants, we
feel well within our
rights to assert all
claimants to Pontifex
Maximus Vicar of
Christ as false
prophets.[xi]
Please
do not be fooled by
the media’s
unwitting accolades
concerning Pope
Francis’ feigned
humility, this man
believes he is
literally Christ on
Earth, or he would not
accept the title of
Vicar of Christ. All
the same, if the
predictions of St.
Malachy are truly at
their fruition, then
the second beast, the
one from the Earth
called the “false
prophet” (Revelation
16:13; 19:20; 20:10)
may well be
Pope Francis in the
role of Petrus Romanus who, unwittingly or not, will lead the world to
worship the dragon.
Interestingly, his
namesake St. Francis
of Assisi would agree.
The
Argentine Cardinal
Jorge Mario Bergoglio
has chosen Francis as
his papal name, a
first in tribute to
Francis of Assisi. It
is noteworthy that St.
Francis of Assisi’s
long Italian name is
Francesco di Pietro
di Bernardone, a title
that can accurately be
viewed as “Peter the
Roman” from the
final line in the
Prophecy of the Popes.
Since the phrase that
supplanted the birth
name Giovanni is
Francesco di Pietro,
and that by sainthood,
it is safe to say that
by choosing Francis of
Assisi’s name, he in
effect chose Francesco
di Pietro, and he is
unlikely to prefer
truncation of the
Pietro element since
Catholicism esteems
Peter (Petrus) as the
rock of the church and
spuriously maintains
he was the first pope.
Rome was an empire and
a city so
Bergoglio’s Italian
ancestry arguably
meets the Roman aspect
in a similar way.
Accordingly, many
argue that Bergoglio
has fulfilled the
Peter the Roman title
with his choice of
papal name.
As
the 2013 conclave
concluded, Bergoglio
said he chose the
original papal name
Francis after St.
Francis of Assisi when
Cardinal Claudio
Hummes exhorted him to
“remember the
poor.”[xii]
The
reader might recall
that our book Petrus
Romanus connected
the friar Assisi with
Petrus Romanus over a
year ago now, quoting
an apocalyptic
prediction he made
soon after St.
Malachy’s prophecy
concerning a Final
Pope:
At
the time of this
tribulation a man, not
canonically elected,
will be raised to the
Pontificate, who, by
his cunning, will
endeavor to draw many
into error and
death… Some
preachers will keep
silence about the
truth, and others will
trample it under foot
and deny it…for in
those days Jesus
Christ will send them not
a true Pastor, but a
destroyer.[xiii]
Was
there something
non-canonic about the
election of Pope
Francis? For starters,
Pope Benedict XVI’s
retirement makes for
an unprecedented
situation. When a pope
is elected, the Church
expects that he will
remain in office until
his death. Before now,
only five popes
unambiguously resigned
with historical
certainty, all between
the tenth and
fifteenth centuries.
Arguably, that makes
Bergoglio’s election
suspect but,
apparently, not a
violation of canon
law. In 1294,
Celestine V issued a
decree declaring it
permissible for a pope
to resign, and then
resigned himself after
only five months as
pope. He lived a few
more years as a hermit
and then as a prisoner
of his tyrannical
successor, Boniface
VIII. Because his
decree was never
repealed, canon law
experts allow that a
pope can resign,
albeit it is
discouraged. Others
have objected that the
fifteen-day rule
between the vacancy of
the office and the
start of the conclave
was circumvented in
order to speed up the
process. This was done
by Pope Benedict’s
final decree but the
urgency to seat his
successor seems
suspicious. While Pope
Francis represents
many firsts, overall,
the most interesting
aspect is his status
as the first ever Jesuit
pope.
The
sitting pontiff’s
background has great
prophetic significance
as the Jesuit order
was formed to
specifically combat
the Protestant
reformation and assert
papal supremacy over
the entire world.
According to a
historian, “The
Jesuits were the
soldiers of the pope:
they knew no law but
the will of their
general, no mode of
worship but the
pope’s dictate no
church but
themselves.”[xiv]
Because
of this, the Jesuit
order was suppressed
and disbanded for its
pernicious
skullduggery by Pope
Clement XIV in 1773,
and by the
mid-eighteenth
century, the Jesuits
had earned a bad
reputation in Europe
for political
maneuvering and
economic exploitation
bar-none. The order
was reinstated in the
early nineteenth
century with the
mission to conquer by
scholarship and
infiltration of the
education system.
Interestingly, Pope
Benedict XVI addressed
the Jesuit order in
2008, encouraging them
to reinvigorate the fourth
vow. He said,
“For this very
reason I have invited
you and also invite
you today to reflect
in order to rediscover
the fullest meaning of
your characteristic
‘fourth vow’ of
obedience to the
Successor of Peter.”[xv]
Church
historians record that
the fourth vow of
obedience is one of
“absolute
subservience to the
pope; to do whatever
he enjoined, and go on
any service he wished,
and into any quarter
of the globe.”[xvi]
A
few ex-Jesuit
whistle-blowers have
called this a blood
oath involving pagan
rites which were laid
bare in the suppressed
document, “Jesuit
Extreme Oath of
Induction,” which
was once recorded in
records of the US
Congress, but was
suspiciously expunged.
According to this
document, they are
indoctrinated into the
principle of Iustum,
Necar, Reges, Impious, meaning,
“It is just to
exterminate or
annihilate impious or
heretical Kings,
Governments, or
Rulers.”[xvii]
The
Jesuit modernists of
today prefer more
subtle methods like
infiltrating the
education system and
promoting biblical
higher criticism that
undermines biblical
authority.
Protestants and
Catholics have written
about a clandestine
war that has been
playing out for some
time behind the scenes
between the papacy and
the Jesuit order. We
will speculate in the
next entry what this
could mean between
Pope Francis Romanus .
. . and the coming
of an alien savior.
PART
2 - Sid
Roth Interviews
Tom Horn &
Cris Putnam On
"It's
Supernatural"
|
|
[i]
Benedict XVI, Light
of the World: The
Pope, the Church,
and the Signs of
the Times (San
Francisco:
Ignatius Press,
2010), 19.
[ii]
Rachel Donadio and
Nicholas Kulish,
“A Statement
Rocks Rome, Then
Sends Shockwaves
Around the
World,” New
York Times,
February 11, 2013,
last accessed
February 13, 2013,
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2013/02/12/lightning-
bolt-strikes-vatican-pope-benedict-resignation/1913095/.
bolt-strikes-vatican-pope-benedict-resignation/1913095/.
[iii]
“Lightning
Strikes St. Peters
Basilica,”
YouTube video,
0:10, posted by
congaspot, last
updated February
12, 2013, last
accessed March 25,
2013, http://youtu.be/Q6olT4ozDyk.
[iv]
Nicole Winfield,
“Pope’s
Retirement Plan
Revealed,” Reuters, last accessed March 25, 2013, http://www.3news.co.nz/Popes-retirement-plan-
revealed/tabid/417/articleID/286573/Default.aspx.
revealed/tabid/417/articleID/286573/Default.aspx.
[v]
“Holy Smoke! Is
This Final Pope
before Jesus?” World Net Daily, last accessed March 25, 2013,
http://www.wnd.com/2013/03/holy-smoke-is-this-final-
pope-before-jesus/#oImqawiZUvBPwORI.99.
pope-before-jesus/#oImqawiZUvBPwORI.99.
[vi]
René Thibaut, La
Mystérieuse Prophétie
des Papes
(Paris: J. Vrin,
1951), 25.
[vii]
Shlomo Cesana,
“Vatican, Israel
Reach Historic
Deal on Last
Supper Site,” Israel
Hayom, January
30, 2013, last
accessed March 25,
2013, http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_article.php?id=7230.
[viii]
Hal Lindsey,
“News from Hal
Lindsey
Ministries,”
email dated March
22, 2013 to author
Cris Putnam.
[ix]
Ethelbert W.
Bullinger, Number
in Scripture
(Pleasant Places
Press, 2004), 208.
[x]
Ethelbert W.
Bullinger, Number
in Scripture,
225 (bolding
added).
[xi]
This
authoritatively
explains why all
popes are false
prophets. See:
John MacArthur,
“The Pope and
the Papacy,” http://www.gty.org/resources/sermons/90-291/the-pope-and-the-papacy.
[xii]
“Why the pope
chose the name
Francis,”
YouTube video,
3:12, posted by
CatholicNewsService,
last updated March
16, 2013, last
accessed March 26,
2013, https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=t2XiT76tgCo.
[xiii]Works
of the Seraphic
Father St. Francis
of Assisi
(1182–1226),
Washbourne, 1882
AD, 248 (also as
quoted on page 389
of this book).
Also see http://www.realclearreligion.com/index_files/ac206ecae86856da08a615cb61987e74-643.php.
[xiv]
W. C. Brownlee, Secret Instructions of the Jesuits
(1857) 7. See: http://archive.org/stream/instructiosecret00browrich#page/7/.
[xv]
“Papal Address
to Members of
Jesuit General
Congregation,” Zenit, March 4, 2008, http://www.zenit.org/en/articles/papal-address-to-members-of-jesuit-general-congregation.
[xvi]
W. C. Brownlee, Secret Instructions of the Jesuits,
6. See: http://archive.org/stream/instructiosecret00browrich#page/6/.
No comments:
Post a Comment