IDES WIDE SHUT
In the show, I presented the fact that throughout history, the month of March has always been the time when war campaigns and saber rattling happens between countries and usually like in the Shakespearean play Julius Caesar, we should take the advice of the old soothsayer and “Beware the Ides of March.”
Julius Caesar was assassinated by his own senators on March 14th 44 B.C, at a meeting in a hall next to Pompey’s Theatre. The conspiracy against Caesar encompassed as many as sixty noblemen, including Caesar’s own protégé, Marcus Brutus. Caesar should have been well aware that many of the senators hated him, but he dismissed his security force not long before his assassination.
It is peculiar synchronicity whereby the same sort of bread and circus theater is transpiring in the political arena in 2016. Of course, many call it political theater, while others are caught up in a form of hero worship and literally do not care the leadership is a replicate form of Caesarism. The people of this country have divided themselves over the political leader they want to the ballot. However, the chosen ones for the GOP are being called non-establishment. This has created a political schism that is similar to what was plaguing the senators of Caesar’s day, and a conspiracy to remove the problem fomented and there was a plot to eliminate the problem.
In a shocking article printed in Breitbart News on March 15th, Dilbert creator and political observer Scott Adams said that the national media was slyly encouraging violent attacks on Donald Trump, including possible murder attempts.
Car Drives Through Protesters Blocking Path to Trump Rally in Arizona As Officer Shrugs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YU3vcvGpALQ&ebc=ANyPxKpJ4cv8jFp3aUsBrtBYbkVlZWVpxvW46bwnugNENRCoAukxh6uNda2pOmGDdASfzAtkUfrVfmYlL3_Ybc8yGS4pLWT-2AIn 1997, Adams wrote, The Dilbert Future, and predicted that in the future, the media will kill famous people to generate news that people will care about.
Three months after that prediction, the media chased Princess Di into a tunnel and created a dangerous situation which killed her but was terrific for television news ratings. The media didn’t plot to kill anyone, but they created a situation that made it likely someone important would die because of the way their business model works. Adams told Breitbart that this was the basis for his prediction.
Over the weekend, I had a discussion with a friend of mine about how over the top the anger is against Trump and how organized liberal groups have become and how the media seems to be invited and actually encouraging the violence.
She told me that she felt he had brought this all upon himself. While I wanted to argue that it wasn’t the case – I backed off and waited until I could think of why the anger is boiling over and once again it is the media fanning the flames of civil unrest.
I agree with what Scott Adams had pointed out and that is we see the media priming the public to try to kill Trump, or at least create some photogenic mayhem at a public event.
He continues to say that no one is sitting in a room plotting Trump’s death, but at least half of the media believes Trump is the next Hitler, and a Hitler assassination would be morally justified.
Justin Raimondo of Antiwar.com pointed out that an attempt by a “protester” to assault, The Trump, resulted in an admiring interview for assaulter Tommy DiMassimo and a piece in the Washington Post justifying the interview.
The media seems to have opened an invitation to future Trump assailants to win their fifteen minutes of fame.
I saw a video this morning of the protesters blocking the roads in Arizona leading to the Trump rally. I saw a jeep that was trying to get through the roadblock and a protester climbed on top of the hood of the Jeep. The Jeep pushed slowly through the crowd and the protestor was thrown off of the hood of the vehicle. A young woman while texting yelled at a cop “That is attempted Murder, that is attempted murder, aren’t you going to arrest the driver for attempted murder?” The cop just shrugged.
This is all great for ratings I guess, the media would be able to have plausible deniability if they triggered a psychopath to act.
This is not an endorsement of Trump, but let’s be honest – the establishment has always wanted to find a way for the United States to go rogue in order to justify martial law and no one can see where this could lead to a civil war.
Still there seems to be a contingency that doesn’t believes a shadow government is going to thwart the election process creating a tension strategy sparking more violence.
We should wake up to the fact that a war campaign in the homeland is being encouraged by the shadow government and the establishment that is creating a hostile environment in politics.
The Boston Globe released a story that focused on “double government” where there is the government we think we are voting for and the real one that is pulling the strings behind the scenes. The story entitled “Vote all you want. The secret government won’t change” cites commentary by Tufts University’s, Michael Glennon.
Glennon gives a pessimistic view of our leadership by stating that though it’s a bedrock American principle that citizens can steer their own government by electing new officials, much of our government no longer works that way.
He says the defense and national security apparatus is effectively self-governing, with virtually no accountability, transparency, or checks and balances of any kind. He uses the term, “double government”: There’s the one we elect, and then there’s the one behind it, steering huge swaths of policy almost unchecked. Elected officials end up serving as mere cover for the real decisions made by the bureaucracy.
It has always been the charge of the conspiracy theorists that a shadow government is controlling the White House, no matter who is sitting on the presidential throne in the Oval Office.
History has also shown that war campaigns, terrorist attacks and many false flag appointments take place during this time of year. The Ides of March fall on the 15th, but the campaigns of war and turbulence begin 5 to 10 days after the date. I stated back in 2014 that war campaigns and bloodshed will trigger the rise of old ideologies that we thought were long dead; namely Communism and Nazism, which will find themselves in Cesar’s Court, which is a metaphor for the political arena.
“The US Congress adopted the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized President Lyndon Johnson to dispatch ground forces to Vietnam on March 8, 1965.” This was the granddaddy of false flags and marked the public beginning of the bloody war in Vietnam.
“On 8 March 1965, 3,500 U.S. Marines were dispatched to South Vietnam marking the beginning of “America’s ground war”, which was well underway by the Ides of March.
“NATO’s war on Yugoslavia was launched on March 24, 1999. The NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, code-named by the US Operation, “Noble Anvil”, started on March 24, 1999 and lasted until June 10, 1999. The media will neglect to throw into the political campaign mania that it was Hillary Clinton who pushed the bill to bomb Kosovo.
The US-NATO led invasion of Iraq started on 20 March 2003 on the pretext that Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD).
The US-NATO Covert War on Syria was initiated on March 15, 2011.
Libya was bombed relentlessly by NATO warplanes starting on March 19, 2011 for a period of approximately seven months. Once again, the blame falls on Hillary Clinton who created this disaster.
In March of 2013, the United States threatened war with Iran and then North Korea entered “state of war” with South Korea.
Now the new campaign is to create a climate of anger here in the United States that could trigger civil upheaval and a political dirty war.
By condoning violence, as a legitimate form of protest, the media has already ensured that the road to hell or in this case the November elections will be filled with mayhem and destruction, for the preservation of the double government’s establishment candidates.
There will be an organized protest that is being called “Democracy Spring” that is being organized for April 11th, through the 16th. Even though the site says that the protest will be non-violent the goal of the protest is to get as many people as they can to be arrested.
The site clearly states:
“We will demand that Congress listen to the People and take immediate action to save our democracy. And we won’t leave until they do — or until they send thousands of us to jail, along with the unmistakable message that our country needs a new Congress, one that that will end the legalized corruption of our democracy and ensure that every American has an equal voice in government.
With hundreds of patriotic Americans being sent to jail, day after day for at least a week simply for sitting in to save our democracy — the drama in Washington will rock the business-as-usual cycle of this election and catapult this critical issue onto center stage.”
If it is a peaceful protest, what will cause them to be arrested?
The site is also asking that people take a pledge to do the following:
“I pledge to be one among thousands who will risk arrest to save democracy in DC between April 11 – 18th.
I pledge to come to Washington DC to support the sit in through legal protest but cannot risk arrest.”
There will also be an organized Philadelphia to Washington DC, sometime between April 2 – 11.
They are claiming their objective is to spark a “fire that transforms the political climate in America.” This is similar to what Mao Tse-tung wrote “A Single Spark Can Start a Prairie Fire,” a well-known letter written about starting a revolutionary war.
The plan was to win over the masses first with protests and then hold a national armed insurrection to seize power transforming the political climate into one of chaos and revolution.
While you may have no intentions of attending a political rally or protest, the unrest that such rallies may unleash will eventually spread throughout our cities; protests and violence completely unrelated to campaign events, but fomented by them, can crop up anywhere.
I am sure while the intentions of nonviolent protest exist, violence accompanies a lot of these protests, many times the violence happens because of agent provocateurs.
I do not know how to convey it, I do not know how to convince anyone that the conspiracy is no longer hidden; it is open and the objective is to encourage a disgraceful and dangerous spectacle that is malicious and terrifying.